CURTISS P-40 WARHAWK | Training Film | Upscaled And Restored WW2 Color Film
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024
- Curtiss P-40 Warhawk. An original upscaled color training film from WW2.
The Curtiss P-40 Warhawk is an American single-engined, single-seat, all-metal fighter-bomber that first flew in 1938. The P-40 design was a modification of the previous Curtiss P-36 Hawk which reduced development time and enabled a rapid entry into production and operational service. The Warhawk was used by most Allied powers during World War II and remained in frontline service until the end of the war. It was the third most-produced American fighter of World War II, after the P-51 and P-47; by November 1944, when production of the P-40 ceased, 13,738 had been built, all at Curtiss-Wright Corporation's main production facilities in Buffalo, New York.
P-40 Warhawk was the name the United States Army Air Corps gave the plane, and after June 1941, the USAAF adopted the name for all models, making it the official name in the U.S. for all P-40s. The British Commonwealth and Soviet air forces used the name Tomahawk for models equivalent to the original P-40, P-40B, and P-40C, and the name Kittyhawk for models equivalent to the P-40D and all later variants. P-40s first saw combat with the British Commonwealth squadrons of the Desert Air Force in the Middle East and North African campaigns, in June 1941. No. 112 Squadron Royal Air Force, was among the first to operate Tomahawks in North Africa and the unit was the first Allied military aviation unit to feature the "shark mouth" logo, copying similar markings on some Luftwaffe Messerschmitt Bf 110 twin-engine fighters.
The P-40's liquid-cooled, supercharged Allison V-1710 V-12 engine's lack of a two-speed supercharger made it inferior to Luftwaffe fighters such as the Messerschmitt Bf 109 or the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 in high-altitude combat and it was rarely used in operations in Northwest Europe. However, between 1941 and 1944, the P-40 played a critical role with Allied air forces in three major theaters: North Africa, the Southwest Pacific, and China. It also had a significant role in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, Alaska, and Italy. The P-40's performance at high altitudes was not as important in those theaters, where it served as an air superiority fighter, bomber escort and fighter bomber.
Although it gained a postwar reputation as a mediocre design, suitable only for close air support, more recent research including scrutiny of the records of Allied squadrons indicates that this was not the case; the P-40 performed surprisingly well as an air superiority fighter, at times suffering severe losses, but also inflicting a very heavy toll on enemy aircraft. Based on war-time victory claims, over 200 Allied fighter pilots - from the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa, the US, and the Soviet Union - became aces flying the P-40.
On 14 October 1938, Curtiss test pilot Edward Elliott flew the prototype XP-40 on its first flight in Buffalo. The XP-40 was the 10th production Curtiss P-36 Hawk, with its Pratt & Whitney R-1830 Twin Wasp 14-cylinder air-cooled radial engine replaced at the direction of Chief Engineer Don R. Berlin by a liquid-cooled, supercharged Allison V-1710 V-12 engine. The first prototype placed the glycol coolant radiator in an underbelly position on the fighter, just aft of the wing's trailing edge. USAAC Fighter Projects Officer Lieutenant Benjamin S. Kelsey flew this prototype some 300 miles in 57 minutes, approximately 315 miles per hour (507 km/h).
General characteristics
Crew: One
Length: 31 ft 8.5 in (9.665 m)
Wingspan: 37 ft 3.5 in (11.367 m)
Height: 10 ft 8 in (3.25 m)
Wing area: 236 sq ft (21.9 m2)
Airfoil: root: NACA2215; tip :NACA2209
Empty weight: 5,922 lb (2,686 kg)
Gross weight: 8,515 lb (3,862 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Allison V-1710-39 V-12 liquid-cooled piston engine, 1,240 hp (920 kW)
Propellers: 3-bladed Curtiss-Wright electric constant-speed propeller
Performance
Maximum speed: 334 mph (538 km/h, 290 kn) at 15,000 ft (4,600 m)
Cruise speed: 308 mph (496 km/h, 268 kn)
Range: 716 mi (1,152 km, 622 nmi) at 70% power
Service ceiling: 29,100 ft (8,900 m)
Time to altitude: 15,000 ft (4,600 m) in 6 minutes 15 seconds
Wing loading: 35.1 lb/sq ft (171 kg/m2)
Power/mass: 0.14 hp/lb (0.23 kW/kg)
Armament
Guns: 6 × 0.5 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns in the wings
Bombs: 250 to 1,000 lb (110 to 450 kg) bombs to a total of 2,000 lb (910 kg) on hardpoints under the fuselage and two underwing
➤➤ Watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: / @dronescapes
➤➤ Join the channel: www.youtube.co...
➤ IG ➤ / dronescapesvideos
➤ FB ➤ / dronescapesvideos
➤ X/Twitter ➤ dronescapes.vi...
➤ THREADS ➤ www.threads.ne...
#Warhawk #trainingvideo #aviation
➤➤ Watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes
➤➤ Join the channel: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes/join
➤ IG ➤ instagram.com/dronescapesvideos
➤ FB ➤ facebook.com/Dronescapesvideos
➤ X/Twitter ➤ dronescapes.video/2p89vedj
➤ THREADS ➤ www.threads.net/@dronescapesvideos
Read of ww2 in alaska; the captured zero a few days earlier had been shooting pilots in parchutes.
More curtis P-40 Tiger f . War ll.. Exellent súper ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ México city 👌♥♥♥♥♥
Was that crash scene at the end real combat footage? Doesn’t look like a model setup to me.
Wasn’t the P-40 the precursor to the P-51? Just wondering as at first glance they look similar.
P-40 is a bit older design (1938) than the P-51 (1940). Most notable difference on the P-51 is its more modern laminar-flow wing (less drag at high speed) and the radiators aft of the wing with intake and exhaust below the fuselage, further reducing drag and even adding a bit of thrust. Both fighters only had single-speed superchargers which made them unsuitable/uncompetitive for fighting at higher altitudes. This high alt. performance improved a lot with later P-51s when it changed to the Rolls-Royce (licensed to Packard) Merlin engine with a two-stage supercharger. The P-40 never got a similar game-changing engine upgrade. The Allison engine's loss of power at high alt. would always limit it to lower altitudes.
@@sixpackpilot thank ya kindly friend. My apologies for not wording my question properly, what I was trying to ask, and again it’s completely my fault for not being more clear, was the P-40 the predecessor of the P-51 or though the P-51 came out later were they in development at the same time?
I’m trying to figure out if first the P-40 was created and the positives of its design were rolled into the P-51 or if they were developed at the same time but for one reason or another the P-51 wasn’t ready until 1940. I was aware of the P-51 not reaching its peak until paired with the British engines but I did not know said engine was duel supercharged. Thank you again for taking the time friend, I wish you and yours well.
Actually, the P-40 was already in production and the British, in need of airplanes, sent their Lend/Lease commission to the U.S. to see if North American would build the P-40 under license. North American sold the British on a new airplane that they could design and produce in 180 days. It was actually done sooner than that. The U.S. Army Air Forces designated it the P-51 Apache. There was really nothing borrowed from the P-40. It was an all new design. It may have been a precursor inasmuch as it was just an earlier design. Though you couldn't say anything was the precursor to the P-38. Sometimes designs are just new.
@@OlNeb-k2b the P-40 is a full generation older. in 1940 the British found Curtiss was at max output and could not meet their demand. They (the British) approached North American Aviation and asked them to build P-40's under license.
North American said how about we design a better plane for you? and they did, in about 120 days. the P-51.
they certainly brought evolutionary and revolutionary ideas to the concept of pursuit aircraft. the P-40 was more an example what not to do than a "precursor".
BTW, the aircraft in this video is a P-40F, which was equipped with a Packard built V-1650 "Merlin". albeit with a less sophisticated super-charger than eventually equipped the P-51.
@@BaikalTii thank you friend, I certainly appreciate you taking the time to answer, I wish you and yours well friend.