The City and its Uncertain Walls by Haruki Murakami - Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @CrescentandJasmine
    @CrescentandJasmine วันที่ผ่านมา

    Really enjoyed your review. It seems we had a lot of the same takes. Just finding your channel. Great stuff! Cheers

  • @eha440
    @eha440 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    With each book he writes, he becomes more and more Murakami Haruki

  • @angussinclair1344
    @angussinclair1344 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review - can't wait to pick this one up! Would be super cool to see you put a top-ten reads of the year or something at the end of the year!

    • @rororeads
      @rororeads  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I normally do :)

  • @bookmark_kl
    @bookmark_kl หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It felt a rehashed version/extended version of "wonderland". But yeah as usual, very readable.

  • @BookishTexan
    @BookishTexan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How thematically different do you think the book is than The Wind Up Bird Chronicle? Structurally there seem to be a number of similarities.

    • @rororeads
      @rororeads  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Both novels grapple with inner and outer worlds…I’d say The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle is more grounded in personal and historical trauma, whereas The City and Its Uncertain Walls explores the metaphysical boundaries between isolation and connection. City is much more abstract I reckon.

    • @BookishTexan
      @BookishTexan หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ Thank you!

  • @takecarealwaysforever3379
    @takecarealwaysforever3379 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    same sentiments

  • @Paromita_M
    @Paromita_M หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hmm feels a bit samey doesn't it. I'm a bit wary of Murakami - I liked Norwegian Wood and didn't like Kafka on the Shore. 1Q84 was an early DNF, but that could have been a mood thing.
    Very nice and helpful review.

  • @tyghe_bright
    @tyghe_bright หลายเดือนก่อน

    What? A Murakami novel where the female character was a bit thin?

  • @IvanWebster-w8j
    @IvanWebster-w8j หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please bear with a curious non-Brit. What does "naff" mean? Nutty? Nonsensical?

    • @rororeads
      @rororeads  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IvanWebster-w8j poor quality

    • @IvanWebster-w8j
      @IvanWebster-w8j หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rororeads Thanks. I continue to enjoy your reviews. You won't thank me for adding a provocative question: What do you make of the "Orbital" Booker win? Sorry.

  • @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd
    @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve been trying to get into 19Q4 or 1Q84 for some time now but have had to put it aside for now. I heard Norwegian Wood was a lot easier and more conventional so may give it a shot before trying anything else plus I’ve always liked that Beatles song. Since you say this one is heavy on exposition and fantasy I have to say no. The only fantasy stuff I can stand is Lord of the Rings which I read as a kid and The Golden Compass (Northern Lights to you). And as for exposition one thing I can’t stand at my age is someone who can’t get to the point. But I like KD too though wouldn’t go so far as to call him my lord and master haha. ⚛❤

  • @sauravsikdar9649
    @sauravsikdar9649 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will Murakami ever get a Nobel?

    • @rororeads
      @rororeads  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sauravsikdar9649 I don’t think he will.

    • @SeanBroussard-dz5zg
      @SeanBroussard-dz5zg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Incredibly unlikely. The Nobel has nothing to do with popularity. Look back over previous winners and you'll see that winners tend to be overlooked writers.

    • @sauravsikdar9649
      @sauravsikdar9649 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SeanBroussard-dz5zg except perhaps Kazuo Ishiguro

    • @thisisveryannoying
      @thisisveryannoying หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is it a sequel or recycling of Hardboiled Wonderland?

    • @sophie201201
      @sophie201201 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I definitely hope not. Most of his books are the same story rewritten over and over again and the way he writes women is atrocious. There are many wonderful authors out there who get very little recognition.