TH-cam Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm Tell us, where you’re watching from? Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah! *SUPPORT DAWAHWISE* ❤www.patreon.com/dawahwise ❤gofund.me/dba0c96f ❤www.paypal.me/dawahwise ❤Join DawahWise Membership: th-cam.com/users/DawahWisejoin
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.” The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Brother Hashim without his trademark cap if I can call it that looks like a totally different person. May Allah the Almighty bless him and his family members, ameen.
بارك الله الأخ هاشم أحب طريقته في الدعوة شخص متمكن ودارس جيد لكتاب النصارى وملم به و بنصوصه المحرفة وتفسيرات العلماء النصارى و يحاجهم بكتابهم وتفسيرات علمائهم بطريقة سهلة وواضحة وبثبات وثقة زاده الله تمكناً وجعله الله سبباً أن يهدي الله على يديه الضلال من العباد آمين
👉 *2 Samuel **7:22* *How great You are, O Lord GOD! For there is none like You, and there is no God but You,* according to everything we have heard with our own ears. 👉 *Exodus 9:14* Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.* 👉 *Isaiah 40:18* To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.” The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time? EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor. And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel. And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God? EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father. These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make. So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate. GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time? EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel. Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind. And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
A prophet is someone SENT by God, God is not a prophet by definition, they are mutually exclusive. If this man was GOD, he would never have claimed to be a prophet or called a prophet by those who saw him. Matthew 21:11 And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.”
Luke 7:16 Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” John 4:19 The woman *said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. Matthew 21:46 When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet. John 6:14 Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.” John 7:40 Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.” John 9:17 So they *said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.” Luke 24:19 And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people, Mark 6:15 But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” Mark 8:28 They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.” Luke 9:8 and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again. OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms it😇 Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem. Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”. In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet. Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his deaff and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,
Christians! Please avoid Hashim, and do not challenge to debate the Bible. His good knowledge will show no mercy and you will probably get angry and start shouting and insulting.
💥 The original term in the Torah and Injeel is "Rabb, which means Lord/Master/Sustainer" not "Abb, which means Father". Surat Al-Fatiha in The Noble Qur'an starts with "Alhamdolellahy Rab Al'aalameen" not "Abb Al'aalameen". 👉 *Chapter 1 The Opening سورة الفاتحة - Al-Fatiha: Verse 2* الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;
Quran 4:109 Here you are - those who argue on their behalf in [this] worldly life - but who will argue with Allah for them on the Day of Resurrection, or who will [then] be their representative?
Make a dawah towards al aqsa masjid and also need to know what we learn about the blessed people of Palestinians may Allah reward them the highest jannah insha Allah
He has an extensive amount of information, ranges a lot. I remember him actually is (not was but is) someone who is proficient in bible studies. Or I mixed up with another brother... But he has so many facts to backed it up. He never want to be right. he was correcting what was wrong. The reason you kept seeing him win is only because the opponent couldn't refute anymore when they were trapped in the corner by their own book
The term father is not exclusive to Jesus. John 20:17 the Lord Jesus after His resurrection tells Mary Magdalene to go to His brethren and say to them, “I ascend unto My Father, and your Father; and to My God, and your God.” The majesty of these words is almost beyond our understanding.
as a somali i could see where the greeks or hebrews maybe got confused with the word " father ". we have arabic words , hebrew words, aramic words , heck even ancient egyptian words in our language. we have this words that we use for god sometimes. its " ebbe " and never " abba " becouse abba means littery father. but ebbe is reserved for allah only. we use many words for god. wr say ilah, ilahey ' allah" , and also " ebbe ( spelled eebeh sometimes ) " .. am sure this same words propaply used to exists in atamic aswell. becouse just like hebrews we also sat abba or abbo to mean father. i would not be suprised that aramic also had abba and aswll ebbe.. ebbe meaning god and abba meaning father. am sure the greeks just messed it up. we somalis have many words from othrr languages around the world. if yoy want ancient words then undetstand somali words. it comes in handy especialy with ancient egyptian words. bisad means cat for example in ancient egyotians. somali is the only language that uses the same word and many words of ancient civilizations. aramic the same. am pretty sure the word ebbe ( god ) entered the somalia language through the aramaic language aswell the word abba (father ) its ebbe/ebbee (god ) and not abba (father ) , the hebrews and greeks messed it up 😂😂😂. the difference between ancient egyptians and the aramic is the ancient egyptians left many words behind on walls. and it has many words in common with somali language, dont ask me how. if we could find only all the words that aramics used for god through the years would have been great. am sure ebbe ( or eebeh) or spelled different will be there
May The Lord Jesus Christ God Almighty guide these brothers to open their eyes. The Bible says ye do error not knowing scripture. I pray they come to the truth
He can't even help himself, his prayer literally got rejected, he doesn't even know the hour nor what on the fig from far away, let alone answer your prayer. Bible is no more than a compilation of sheets paper authored by an anonymous author and where it also contains tons of contradictions, this is where you got your information regarding jesus from. Rubbish. You like it or not, nowhere Jesus ever EXPLICITLY testified himself as a God and teach about God manifest as three person and you can go on bring as many AMBIGUOUS verse as you want, the truth will remain explicit and clear, not ambiguous and mystery. Al Quran Al Maidah 109-120. 109 "˹Consider˺ the Day Allah will gather the messengers and say, “What response did you receive?” They will reply, “We have no knowledge ˹compared to You˺! You ˹alone˺ are indeed the Knower of all unseen.” 110 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember My favour upon you and your mother: how I supported you with the holy spirit so you spoke to people in ˹your˺ infancy and adulthood. How I taught you writing, wisdom, the Torah, and the Gospel. How you moulded a bird from clay-by My Will-and breathed into it and it became a ˹real˺ bird-by My Will. How you healed the blind and the lepers-by My Will. How you brought the dead to life-by My Will. How I prevented the Children of Israel from harming you when you came to them with clear proofs and the disbelievers among them said, “This is nothing but pure magic.” 111 And how I inspired the disciples, “Believe in Me and My messenger!” They declared, “We believe and bear witness that we fully submit ˹to Allah˺.” 112 ˹Remember˺ when the disciples asked, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Would your Lord be willing to send down to us a table spread with food from heaven?” Jesus answered, “Fear Allah if you are ˹truly˺ believers.” 113 They said, “We ˹only˺ wish to eat from it to reassure our hearts, to verify you are indeed truthful to us, and to become its witnesses.” 114 Jesus, son of Mary, prayed, “O Allah, our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread with food as a feast for us-the first and last of us-and as a sign from You. Provide for us! You are indeed the Best Provider.” 115 Allah answered, “I am sending it down to you. But whoever among you denies afterwards will be subjected to a torment I have never inflicted on anyone of My creation.” 116 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you ever ask the people to worship you and your mother as gods besides Allah?” He will answer, “Glory be to You! How could I ever say what I had no right to say? If I had said such a thing, you would have certainly known it. You know what is ˹hidden˺ within me, but I do not know what is within You. Indeed, You ˹alone˺ are the Knower of all unseen. 117 I never told them anything except what You ordered me to say: “Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord!” And I was witness over them as long as I remained among them. But when You took me, You were the Witness over them-and You are a Witness over all things. 118 If You punish them, they belong to You after all. But if You forgive them, You are surely the Almighty, All-Wise.” 119 Allah will declare, “This is the Day when ˹only˺ the faithful will benefit from their faithfulness. Theirs are Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. That is the ultimate triumph.” 120 To Allah ˹alone˺ belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and everything within. And He is Most Capable of everything."
GOD appeared to Abraham at the Oaks of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance of his tent. It was the hottest part of the day. He looked up and saw three men standing. He ran from his tent to greet them and bowed before them. He said, “Master, if it please you, stop for a while with your servant. I’ll get some water so you can wash your feet. Rest under this tree. I’ll get some food to refresh you on your way, since your travels have brought you across my path.” They said, “Certainly. Go ahead.” Abraham hurried into the tent to Sarah. He said, “Hurry. Get three cups of our best flour; knead it and make bread.” Then Abraham ran to the cattle pen and picked out a nice plump calf and gave it to the servant who lost no time getting it ready. Then he got curds and milk, brought them with the calf that had been roasted, set the meal before the men, and stood there under the tree while they ate.
It's impossible that Hazrat Isa Alaihessalam ever called Allah "Father". It's impossible for a prophet to make such a mistake, and it's certainly impossible that Allah would ever allow a prophet to make such a ginormous mistake. To acknowledge that he ever did so is pure evil. Any book, including any bible, that states he referred to Allah as "Father" shows the extent to which those books have been perverted, corrupted, manipulated. The Muslim man here needs to wise up to this fact. Any book or historical record that refers to, or implies, Allah as being "Father" is the work of the devil and evil people.
Back in the time of Isa a.s. it is quite possible. They took the term Father to be literally a Father of Isa a.s., just the way they take so many things out of context. Therefore the Quran was revealed, to correct the mistakes.
Jesus is worshiped after he ascended to heaven by the apostles Luke 24:50-53 The Ascension of Jesus 50 When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. 52 THEN THEY WORSHIPED HIM AND RETURNED TO JERUSALEM WITH GREAT JOY AND THEY STAYED CONTINUALLY AT THE TEMPLE , PRAISING GOD.
The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words than the one translated `worship' in the New Testament. The Greek word translated `worship' in the New Testament seems to emphasize the bodily position of prostration involved in worship. As such it differs from the general usage of the Greek word, which implies giving honor by kissing or bowing to kiss the hand or even foot. This kind of worship in Greek generally was not for God or gods, but for people in high position from whom petitions are made. The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words. Most of the texts in the New Testament either refer clearly to worship of God or are somewhat ambiguous acts of homage. Some texts show clearly that the word does not imply divinity. Such an example is in Matthew 9:18. `While he speaks these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead...' This abject homage of the ruler was certainly not the worship of Jesus as God. Dictionaries of New Testament Greek made even by Trinitarian scholars recognize this variety in the usage of the word. Even Matthew 2:2,8,11; 20:20; Luke 4:7; 24:52 are considered by Harper and Row's Analytical Greek Lexicon to be examples of the word in which it does not imply divinity. The line between the two meanings will therefore often be determined by the faith of the reader, and as such cannot be construed as proof of the deity of Jesus.
Hamzah, Muslims must also believe and follow the Bible as long as it does not contradict the Quran. And, believe and follow the Bible that its followers believe and follow the Bible. That is the essence of the command to believe in those books.
👉 *Isaiah 45:14,18* 14 *This is what the Lord says:* “The products of Egypt and the merchandise of Cush, and those tall Sabeans- they will come over to you and will be yours; they will trudge behind you, coming over to you in chains. They will bow down before you and plead with you, saying, *‘Surely God is with you, and there is no other;* *there is no other god.’”* 18 For this is what the Lord says- he who created the heavens, he is God; he who fashioned and made the earth, he founded it; he did not create it to be empty, but formed it to be inhabited- he says: *“I am the Lord,* *and there is no other.* 👉 *Isaiah 45:20-21* 20 “Gather together and come; assemble, you fugitives from the nations. *Ignorant are those who carry about idols of wood,* *who pray to gods that cannot save.* 21 Declare what is to be, present it- let them take counsel together. Who foretold this long ago, who declared it from the distant past? *Was it not I, the Lord?* *And there is no God apart from me,* *a righteous God and a Savior;* *there is none but me.*
👉 *Isaiah 45:5* *I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God.* I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, 👉 *Exodus 9:14* Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.* 👉 *Deuteronomy 4:35* You were shown these things *so that you would know that the LORD is God; there is no other besides Him.* 👉 *Deuteronomy 32:39* *See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me.* I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, *and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.* 👉 *Psalm 18:31* *For who is God besides the LORD?* And who is the Rock except our God? 👉 *Isaiah 43:10* "You are My witnesses," declares the LORD, "and My servant whom I have chosen, *so that you may consider and believe Me and understand that I am He. Before Me no god was formed, and after Me none will come.* 👉 *Isaiah 44:8* Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. *Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.* 👉 *Isaiah 46:9* Remember the former things of old: *for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,*
When God said to Moses pbuh I am who I am now go forth and do what I told you to do the Pagans start jumping up and down clapping and shouting we’ve cracked it his name is I AM 🤦🏽 Poor Christians always get CORNERED in speakers CORNER 😂
Masterclass Alhamdulillah, Paul seems misguided but a nice man. May Allah SWT guide those who are sincere to the true and correct path. Hope Paul will sit and ponder on this conversation.
lol If I ask a Christian about John 17:3 & they respond with a question is Allah a father? . Simple are you going to ask a Unitarian or a johova witness is Allah a father if they brought up the same verse
Gospel of john clearly do not teach about allah. The whole gospel teach Father Son and holy spirit as God. I mean same gospel of John jesus said everything father does he do the same. John start his gospel by pointing jesus as creator of everything.
@@abutalsafuba2179 Just a translation. In Swedish Bible it says Gud. Its just a title. In Aramaic, Greek, Hebrew it says Father. Jesus said Father 165 times in Bible so its very clear is not allah.
👉 *Jeremiah 8:8* 8 *“‘How can you say, “We are wise,* *for we have the law of the LORD,”* *when actually the lying pen of the scribes* *has handled it falsely?* 👉 *Jeremiah 23:36* 36 But you must not mention ‘a message from the LORD’ again, because each one’s word becomes their own message. *So you distort the words of the living God,* the LORD Almighty, our God.
Moon God? Quran 41:37. And from among His signs are the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. Prostrate yourselves not to the sun nor to the moon, but prostrate yourselves to Allah who created them, if you (really) worship Him.
💥 *What relationship do these false, pagan, gods have with one another?* El (a pagan god) is the father of many pagan gods including Baal- Hadad, Mot (god of death), Anat (daughter of El), Yam (god of the sea) and Yahweh. Under the Canaanite pantheon, El had 70 sons and a wife named Athirat (Asherah). Next to El in the pantheon hierarchy is Baal, who was also referred to as Adon which means lord/husband. Adonai used sometimes to refer to God of the Bible is derived from Adon. Baal was also known as god of fertility and storm, rain and drought, at times depicted as a BULL. EL and Baal were the traditional Canaanite father and son gods and were widely worshipped in Canaan dating back possibly to around 2000 BCE. The worship of El and Baal was prevalent in Canaan and the Phoenician cities, temples of worship were built for El and Baal all over the Levant.
💥 Dear Christians! Do you know that Baal is the brother of Yahweh? And do you know that the Core Essence of Baal worship is a pagan Human Sacrifice? *Early Iron Age (1200-1000 BCE)* - For example, the Israelite religion consisted of Canaanite gods such as El, the ruler of the pantheon, Asherah, his consort, and Baal. Yahweh is described as one of the sons of El in Deuteronomy 32:8-9, but this was removed by a later emendation to the text. 👉 *Deuteronomy 32:8-9* 8 When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when he divided all mankind, he set up boundaries for the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel. 9 For the Lord’s portion is his people, Jacob his allotted inheritance.
TH-cam Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm
Tell us, where you’re watching from?
Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah!
*SUPPORT DAWAHWISE*
❤www.patreon.com/dawahwise
❤gofund.me/dba0c96f
❤www.paypal.me/dawahwise
❤Join DawahWise Membership:
th-cam.com/users/DawahWisejoin
Dorset, England.
Lahore, Pakistan
Watching from Philippines 🇵🇭 mindanao Alhamdulillah
Canada. TH-cam is hitting me as well. Will defenetly take revenge
@@DawahWise
Currently, in Malaysia
Brother Hashim back ☝🏽🇵🇸💪
He's an Indian
ماشاءاللہ
I give salam from the people of Bangladesh 🇧🇩❤️
His eye is not blind but his heart
Hashim does not even need to disturb the Quran; just the bible is enough to refute this christian
Thanks ALLAH for Islam
I don't have any words to express how blessed I am. Alhamdullilah
Masha' Allah. Hashim & Mansur - the unbeatable duo.
Great confidence by hashim, brother.
The definition of crashing a party and taking over the festivities!
The debate ended with the christian leaving utterly devastated; all his trinitarian beliefs wrapped up and ready for disposal...
everythin they depend on was made up
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Masha Allah Hashim, you completely ripped the guy to pieces!
Allhumdullah for the Grace of Islam
Brother Hashim without his trademark cap if I can call it that looks like a totally different person.
May Allah the Almighty bless him and his family members, ameen.
Brother Hashim,
Mashallah may Allah protect him!!
Bro Hashim Terbaikkkk... Penjelasan yg mantap....
بارك الله الأخ هاشم أحب طريقته في الدعوة شخص متمكن ودارس جيد لكتاب النصارى وملم به و بنصوصه المحرفة وتفسيرات العلماء النصارى و يحاجهم بكتابهم وتفسيرات علمائهم بطريقة سهلة وواضحة وبثبات وثقة زاده الله تمكناً وجعله الله سبباً أن يهدي الله على يديه الضلال من العباد آمين
Alhamdulillah for Islam! Amazing Brother Hashim! May Allah continue to bless and help you. JazakAllah Khairan!
جزاكم الله خيرا 🇲🇦المغرب
Brother hashim hit the nail on the head
Alhamdulillahi blessings of Islam
Superbly debated by Brother Hashim!
God bless you bro hashim.
People ask what series do i watch on my free time, i said i watch dawahwise. May Allah bless Hashim and Mansur for their dawah
Good to see how the Unitarians are respectfully listening to the conversation.
12:46 " Join the queue you're next" 😂😂😂
He said I am not joining the queu
😂😂😂😂 hashim is their destroyer of happiness and belief.
@@abzinho10karim25 and their god hhh
At the end the penny dropped...
Thank God it actually does at times, as the denial is deep and the brainwashing scary!
God forbid I ever fall for Christianity.
Islam is the one and only true relligion anyone who denies that is lost
This Christian man tries to run away the truth!!
How easy christian pagan gets triggered...
Hashim you washed and rinsed the poor guy 😅
Islam ☪️ = professor
Christine= patient please learn about the truth
Alhumdulilah
👉 *2 Samuel **7:22*
*How great You are, O Lord GOD! For there is none like You, and there is no God but You,* according to everything we have heard with our own ears.
👉 *Exodus 9:14*
Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.*
👉 *Isaiah 40:18*
To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
Allahou Akbar thanks to brother Hashim
My Christian brother from Sowerby bridge, Halifax
May Allah SWT bless the DawahWise team Ameen ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Hashim our hero. MashaAllah
brother hashim nailed it!
Subhanallah,first time seeing Hashim without hat :)
Masha'Allah
Hashim is really a slayer. Mashallah
That was a decent conversation and well done brother hashim.
Thank you
Brother Hashim... I love how you expose these Christians. I wonder which country are you coming from
Jesus didn't ask you to call God father, Greeks who translated the bible ask you to do so. Jesus spoke Aramiac, and thus he used the word Allah
Excellent
Allahhumma barik
Belief in God is the pillar of any religion. Whatever religion we are the main pillar is belief in God.
May Allah guide this Humble Giant ❤ to the true Path of Islam . Ameen
Well done 👏
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time?
EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor.
And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel.
And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being
So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God?
EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father.
These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make.
So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate.
GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time?
EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel.
Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind.
And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
A prophet is someone SENT by God, God is not a prophet by definition, they are mutually exclusive.
If this man was GOD, he would never have claimed to be a prophet or called a prophet by those who saw him.
Matthew 21:11
And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.”
Luke 7:16
Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!”
John 4:19
The woman *said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet.
Matthew 21:46
When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet.
John 6:14
Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.”
John 7:40
Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.”
John 9:17
So they *said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.”
Luke 24:19
And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people,
Mark 6:15
But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.”
Mark 8:28
They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.”
Luke 9:8
and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again.
OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms it😇
Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem.
Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”.
In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet.
Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his deaff and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,
☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽❤️❤️❤️
Christians! Please avoid Hashim, and do not challenge to debate the Bible. His good knowledge will show no mercy and you will probably get angry and start shouting and insulting.
Allah is the greatest 🤲🏼🇵🇸❤️
W Bro Hashim 🗿🔥
Mashallah
💥 The original term in the Torah and Injeel is "Rabb, which means Lord/Master/Sustainer" not "Abb, which means Father". Surat Al-Fatiha in The Noble Qur'an starts with "Alhamdolellahy Rab Al'aalameen" not "Abb Al'aalameen".
👉 *Chapter 1 The Opening سورة الفاتحة - Al-Fatiha: Verse 2*
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;
From 🇧🇩
Ask them to read Ezekiel.First 6 pages.
Hebrew is very easy to learn.
Just 900 words.
Quran 4:109 Here you are - those who argue on their behalf in [this] worldly life - but who will argue with Allah for them on the Day of Resurrection, or who will [then] be their representative?
WOW, Hashim exposed and destroyed this preacher, . To Hashim👍👍👍👍🤣
Assalamualaikum hashim brothers iconic cap is missing here
My favourite bro
Make a dawah towards al aqsa masjid and also need to know what we learn about the blessed people of Palestinians may Allah reward them the highest jannah insha Allah
Muslim wins hands down 😅
Bro hashim direct..and spot on..tdk bertele 2
There is the King's James version and the New Kings one.
unitarians watching hashim be like: WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!
We love you brother Hashim! MashAllah! May Allah swt increase you and your family ameeen. 💪🏽✌🏽
Sharp
Watched several of hashims videos this guy always wants to be right
Wants to be right with facts and
NOT wants to be right without facts
He has an extensive amount of information, ranges a lot. I remember him actually is (not was but is) someone who is proficient in bible studies. Or I mixed up with another brother... But he has so many facts to backed it up. He never want to be right. he was correcting what was wrong. The reason you kept seeing him win is only because the opponent couldn't refute anymore when they were trapped in the corner by their own book
Which guy, the trinitarian or Hashim?
When you have no idea or fact you claimed to be victim.Use your brain and analyse. Dont be ignorant
WOW, Hashim exposed and destroyed this preacher, and when cornered and have no answers, it’s time to Run Run Run 🏃♂️🏃♂️🏃♂️. To Hashim👍👍👍👍🤣
Muslim's point of view is crystal clear ☝️
The term father is not exclusive to Jesus.
John 20:17 the Lord Jesus after His resurrection tells Mary Magdalene to go to His brethren and say to them, “I ascend unto My Father, and your Father; and to My God, and your God.” The majesty of these words is almost beyond our understanding.
Its very fast paced,,,l pity the trinitarian,,,hashim made him breathless 🤣
Those same lot mansur also defeated they didn't realise its double defeat
as a somali i could see where the greeks or hebrews maybe got confused with the word " father ". we have arabic words , hebrew words, aramic words , heck even ancient egyptian words in our language. we have this words that we use for god sometimes. its " ebbe " and never " abba " becouse abba means littery father. but ebbe is reserved for allah only. we use many words for god. wr say ilah, ilahey ' allah" , and also " ebbe ( spelled eebeh sometimes ) " .. am sure this same words propaply used to exists in atamic aswell. becouse just like hebrews we also sat abba or abbo to mean father. i would not be suprised that aramic also had abba and aswll ebbe.. ebbe meaning god and abba meaning father. am sure the greeks just messed it up. we somalis have many words from othrr languages around the world. if yoy want ancient words then undetstand somali words. it comes in handy especialy with ancient egyptian words. bisad means cat for example in ancient egyotians. somali is the only language that uses the same word and many words of ancient civilizations. aramic the same. am pretty sure the word ebbe ( god ) entered the somalia language through the aramaic language aswell the word abba (father ) its ebbe/ebbee (god ) and not abba (father ) , the hebrews and greeks messed it up 😂😂😂.
the difference between ancient egyptians and the aramic is the ancient egyptians left many words behind on walls. and it has many words in common with somali language, dont ask me how. if we could find only all the words that aramics used for god through the years would have been great. am sure ebbe ( or eebeh) or spelled different will be there
May The Lord Jesus Christ God Almighty guide these brothers to open their eyes. The Bible says ye do error not knowing scripture. I pray they come to the truth
He can't even help himself, his prayer literally got rejected, he doesn't even know the hour nor what on the fig from far away, let alone answer your prayer. Bible is no more than a compilation of sheets paper authored by an anonymous author and where it also contains tons of contradictions, this is where you got your information regarding jesus from. Rubbish. You like it or not, nowhere Jesus ever EXPLICITLY testified himself as a God and teach about God manifest as three person and you can go on bring as many AMBIGUOUS verse as you want, the truth will remain explicit and clear, not ambiguous and mystery. Al Quran Al Maidah 109-120. 109 "˹Consider˺ the Day Allah will gather the messengers and say, “What response did you receive?” They will reply, “We have no knowledge ˹compared to You˺! You ˹alone˺ are indeed the Knower of all unseen.” 110 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember My favour upon you and your mother: how I supported you with the holy spirit so you spoke to people in ˹your˺ infancy and adulthood. How I taught you writing, wisdom, the Torah, and the Gospel. How you moulded a bird from clay-by My Will-and breathed into it and it became a ˹real˺ bird-by My Will. How you healed the blind and the lepers-by My Will. How you brought the dead to life-by My Will. How I prevented the Children of Israel from harming you when you came to them with clear proofs and the disbelievers among them said, “This is nothing but pure magic.” 111 And how I inspired the disciples, “Believe in Me and My messenger!” They declared, “We believe and bear witness that we fully submit ˹to Allah˺.” 112 ˹Remember˺ when the disciples asked, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Would your Lord be willing to send down to us a table spread with food from heaven?” Jesus answered, “Fear Allah if you are ˹truly˺ believers.” 113 They said, “We ˹only˺ wish to eat from it to reassure our hearts, to verify you are indeed truthful to us, and to become its witnesses.” 114 Jesus, son of Mary, prayed, “O Allah, our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread with food as a feast for us-the first and last of us-and as a sign from You. Provide for us! You are indeed the Best Provider.” 115 Allah answered, “I am sending it down to you. But whoever among you denies afterwards will be subjected to a torment I have never inflicted on anyone of My creation.” 116 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you ever ask the people to worship you and your mother as gods besides Allah?” He will answer, “Glory be to You! How could I ever say what I had no right to say? If I had said such a thing, you would have certainly known it. You know what is ˹hidden˺ within me, but I do not know what is within You. Indeed, You ˹alone˺ are the Knower of all unseen. 117 I never told them anything except what You ordered me to say: “Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord!” And I was witness over them as long as I remained among them. But when You took me, You were the Witness over them-and You are a Witness over all things. 118 If You punish them, they belong to You after all. But if You forgive them, You are surely the Almighty, All-Wise.” 119 Allah will declare, “This is the Day when ˹only˺ the faithful will benefit from their faithfulness. Theirs are Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. That is the ultimate triumph.” 120 To Allah ˹alone˺ belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and everything within. And He is Most Capable of everything."
❤
He should learn the medieval English language.
GOD appeared to Abraham at the Oaks of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance of his tent. It was the hottest part of the day. He looked up and saw three men standing. He ran from his tent to greet them and bowed before them. He said, “Master, if it please you, stop for a while with your servant. I’ll get some water so you can wash your feet. Rest under this tree. I’ll get some food to refresh you on your way, since your travels have brought you across my path.” They said, “Certainly. Go ahead.” Abraham hurried into the tent to Sarah. He said, “Hurry. Get three cups of our best flour; knead it and make bread.” Then Abraham ran to the cattle pen and picked out a nice plump calf and gave it to the servant who lost no time getting it ready. Then he got curds and milk, brought them with the calf that had been roasted, set the meal before the men, and stood there under the tree while they ate.
It's impossible that Hazrat Isa Alaihessalam ever called Allah "Father". It's impossible for a prophet to make such a mistake, and it's certainly impossible that Allah would ever allow a prophet to make such a ginormous mistake. To acknowledge that he ever did so is pure evil. Any book, including any bible, that states he referred to Allah as "Father" shows the extent to which those books have been perverted, corrupted, manipulated. The Muslim man here needs to wise up to this fact. Any book or historical record that refers to, or implies, Allah as being "Father" is the work of the devil and evil people.
Back in the time of Isa a.s. it is quite possible.
They took the term Father to be literally a Father of Isa a.s., just the way they take so many things out of context.
Therefore the Quran was revealed, to correct the mistakes.
Jesus is worshiped after he ascended to heaven by the apostles
Luke 24:50-53 The Ascension of Jesus
50 When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. 52 THEN THEY WORSHIPED HIM AND RETURNED TO JERUSALEM WITH GREAT JOY AND THEY STAYED CONTINUALLY AT THE TEMPLE , PRAISING GOD.
The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words than the one translated `worship' in the New Testament. The Greek word translated `worship' in the New Testament seems to emphasize the bodily position of prostration involved in worship. As such it differs from the general usage of the Greek word, which implies giving honor by kissing or bowing to kiss the hand or even foot. This kind of worship in Greek generally was not for God or gods, but for people in high position from whom petitions are made. The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words. Most of the texts in the New Testament either refer clearly to worship of God or are somewhat ambiguous acts of homage. Some texts show clearly that the word does not imply divinity. Such an example is in Matthew 9:18. `While he speaks these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead...' This abject homage of the ruler was certainly not the worship of Jesus as God. Dictionaries of New Testament Greek made even by Trinitarian scholars recognize this variety in the usage of the word. Even Matthew 2:2,8,11; 20:20; Luke 4:7; 24:52 are considered by Harper and Row's Analytical Greek Lexicon to be examples of the word in which it does not imply divinity. The line between the two meanings will therefore often be determined by the faith of the reader, and as such cannot be construed as proof of the deity of Jesus.
christians need to talk to hashim before taking their beliefs any further !
Hamzah, Muslims must also believe and follow the Bible as long as it does not contradict the Quran. And, believe and follow the Bible that its followers believe and follow the Bible. That is the essence of the command to believe in those books.
👉 *Isaiah 45:14,18*
14 *This is what the Lord says:*
“The products of Egypt and the merchandise of Cush,
and those tall Sabeans-
they will come over to you
and will be yours;
they will trudge behind you,
coming over to you in chains.
They will bow down before you
and plead with you, saying,
*‘Surely God is with you, and there is no other;*
*there is no other god.’”*
18 For this is what the Lord says-
he who created the heavens,
he is God;
he who fashioned and made the earth,
he founded it;
he did not create it to be empty,
but formed it to be inhabited-
he says:
*“I am the Lord,*
*and there is no other.*
👉 *Isaiah 45:20-21*
20 “Gather together and come;
assemble, you fugitives from the nations.
*Ignorant are those who carry about idols of wood,*
*who pray to gods that cannot save.*
21 Declare what is to be, present it-
let them take counsel together.
Who foretold this long ago,
who declared it from the distant past?
*Was it not I, the Lord?*
*And there is no God apart from me,*
*a righteous God and a Savior;*
*there is none but me.*
First of all, jesus wasn't hes name.
End of discussion.
Cooked him like kebab 😭😅
Jesus is not all knowing. Not God then. Period.
👉 *Isaiah 45:5*
*I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God.* I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me,
👉 *Exodus 9:14*
Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.*
👉 *Deuteronomy 4:35*
You were shown these things *so that you would know that the LORD is God; there is no other besides Him.*
👉 *Deuteronomy 32:39*
*See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me.* I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, *and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.*
👉 *Psalm 18:31*
*For who is God besides the LORD?* And who is the Rock except our God?
👉 *Isaiah 43:10*
"You are My witnesses," declares the LORD, "and My servant whom I have chosen, *so that you may consider and believe Me and understand that I am He. Before Me no god was formed, and after Me none will come.*
👉 *Isaiah 44:8*
Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. *Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.*
👉 *Isaiah 46:9*
Remember the former things of old: *for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,*
The God is the God of Jesus Christ here
When God said to Moses pbuh I am who I am now go forth and do what I told you to do the Pagans start jumping up and down clapping and shouting we’ve cracked it his name is I AM 🤦🏽
Poor Christians always get CORNERED in speakers CORNER 😂
I am is just a english translation YHWH but the name is a title. God of bible name is a title.
@@enockt6218 I am translated is Asher Aygo Amee not YHWY!!!!
@@enockt6218 Why do you lie????
@@enockt6218 Is this what your god told you to do? Waffle with Bs???? Smh
@@enockt6218 There is NO Yhwy in your New Pagan Covenant Testament and waffling with Bs acting as if you have a clue will not help you!!!!
Masterclass Alhamdulillah, Paul seems misguided but a nice man. May Allah SWT guide those who are sincere to the true and correct path. Hope Paul will sit and ponder on this conversation.
lol If I ask a Christian about John 17:3 & they respond with a question is Allah a father? .
Simple are you going to ask a Unitarian or a johova witness is Allah a father if they brought up the same verse
Gospel of john clearly do not teach about allah.
The whole gospel teach Father Son and holy spirit as God.
I mean same gospel of John jesus said everything father does he do the same. John start his gospel by pointing jesus as creator of everything.
@enockt6218 Actually in the Arabic bible john 17.3 does say Allah. But it doesnt say Father, son and the holy spirit in any language.
@@abutalsafuba2179
Just a translation. In Swedish Bible it says Gud. Its just a title.
In Aramaic, Greek, Hebrew it says Father.
Jesus said Father 165 times in Bible so its very clear is not allah.
👉 *Jeremiah 8:8*
8 *“‘How can you say, “We are wise,*
*for we have the law of the LORD,”*
*when actually the lying pen of the scribes*
*has handled it falsely?*
👉 *Jeremiah 23:36*
36 But you must not mention ‘a message from the LORD’ again, because each one’s word becomes their own message. *So you distort the words of the living God,* the LORD Almighty, our God.
Christian dont know what contradiction means and a book who have contradiction even one cant called a holly books
nope you never study it thats all and clueless about it
Hashim is a student of the school of the legendary Deedat, and so no wonder he is a bulldoser ...
Allah is moon god of muhamad
Moon God? Quran 41:37. And from among His signs are the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. Prostrate yourselves not to the sun nor to the moon, but prostrate yourselves to Allah who created them, if you (really) worship Him.
You can't mess with brother hashim.
Alhumdulillah
That man is a fruitcake tryna be smart
But hashim ain't letting you fly so easily
💥 *What relationship do these false, pagan, gods have with one another?*
El (a pagan god) is the father of many pagan gods including Baal- Hadad, Mot (god of death), Anat (daughter of El), Yam (god of the sea) and Yahweh. Under the Canaanite pantheon, El had 70 sons and a wife named Athirat (Asherah).
Next to El in the pantheon hierarchy is Baal, who was also referred to as Adon which means lord/husband. Adonai used sometimes to refer to God of the Bible is derived from Adon. Baal was also known as god of fertility and storm, rain and drought, at times depicted as a BULL.
EL and Baal were the traditional Canaanite father and son gods and were widely worshipped in Canaan dating back possibly to around 2000 BCE. The worship of El and Baal was prevalent in Canaan and the Phoenician cities, temples of worship were built for El and Baal all over the Levant.
Algo trading
HOW MANY FATHERS DO THE CHRISTIANS HAVE ............. LOL
💥 Dear Christians! Do you know that Baal is the brother of Yahweh? And do you know that the Core Essence of Baal worship is a pagan Human Sacrifice? *Early Iron Age (1200-1000 BCE)* - For example, the Israelite religion consisted of Canaanite gods such as El, the ruler of the pantheon, Asherah, his consort, and Baal. Yahweh is described as one of the sons of El in Deuteronomy 32:8-9, but this was removed by a later emendation to the text.
👉 *Deuteronomy 32:8-9*
8 When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance,
when he divided all mankind,
he set up boundaries for the peoples
according to the number of the sons of Israel.
9 For the Lord’s portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted inheritance.