One of my most popular videos covers this. The short answer is in philosophy there is no difference, but other disciplines make a distinction. th-cam.com/video/fAkqh9pfVkc/w-d-xo.html
What would you call a similar emotional affiliation to law. Namely if someone experiences pride, happiness and "chauvinism" in having an affiliation to legal norms, legal institutions and legal procedures, for example a person who is a "judge" to his bone? Would you call such a person a judicialist, judiot or something else?
The only sense in which patriotism is justified is the sense in which one owes greater obligations to those who are more dependent upon one than to those who are less dependent. So, inasmuch as your nation (the people of which you are a part) depends on you more than another nation does, it takes higher priority in the satisfaction of your moral obligations. But, even then, there are not special moral obligations just regarding your nation. You have only the same obligations to your nation -- or rather, directly to its constituent people -- that you do to anyone else, but it is more important to fulfill those obligations to your nation (inasmuch as it depends on you more than others) than the same obligations to others. Likewise your city, your neighborhood, your family, and yourself. But your obligations to yourself do not completely obviate your obligations to your family, and neither do your obligations to your nation obviate your obligations to the rest of the world.
Interesting view. It sounds like you would define patria as your fellow citizens, and that patriotism then is the obligations that you have to those fellow citizens above and beyond your general obligations to the rest of the world. This view sounds close to what we will call "liberal patriotism," though isn't an exact match.
Please subsitiute "love" for "honor". Also, it is important to understand that individuals are free to choose which idealisms they wish to uphold it is not an obligation and where idealism do not follow moral or ethical guidelines but only experience choice... consequences. It is only a matter of experiential meaning to care when you are ready to undertake.
i would love it if you had a podcast or spotify to listen to these videos when traveling
Love this channel
Thanks! Thanks for watching!
It would be awesome if you could make a video on Evidentialism
I just like how
Can you make video about omipotent god paradox
just a random question, is there any difference between the word morals and ethics?
One of my most popular videos covers this. The short answer is in philosophy there is no difference, but other disciplines make a distinction. th-cam.com/video/fAkqh9pfVkc/w-d-xo.html
What would you call a similar emotional affiliation to law. Namely if someone experiences pride, happiness and "chauvinism" in having an affiliation to legal norms, legal institutions and legal procedures, for example a person who is a "judge" to his bone? Would you call such a person a judicialist, judiot or something else?
The only sense in which patriotism is justified is the sense in which one owes greater obligations to those who are more dependent upon one than to those who are less dependent. So, inasmuch as your nation (the people of which you are a part) depends on you more than another nation does, it takes higher priority in the satisfaction of your moral obligations. But, even then, there are not special moral obligations just regarding your nation. You have only the same obligations to your nation -- or rather, directly to its constituent people -- that you do to anyone else, but it is more important to fulfill those obligations to your nation (inasmuch as it depends on you more than others) than the same obligations to others. Likewise your city, your neighborhood, your family, and yourself. But your obligations to yourself do not completely obviate your obligations to your family, and neither do your obligations to your nation obviate your obligations to the rest of the world.
Interesting view. It sounds like you would define patria as your fellow citizens, and that patriotism then is the obligations that you have to those fellow citizens above and beyond your general obligations to the rest of the world. This view sounds close to what we will call "liberal patriotism," though isn't an exact match.
Please subsitiute "love" for "honor".
Also, it is important to understand that individuals are free to choose which idealisms they wish to uphold it is not an obligation and where idealism do not follow moral or ethical guidelines but only experience choice... consequences.
It is only a matter of experiential meaning to care when you are ready to undertake.
he didn't critique any viewpoints just state high school information BORING !!!
Example A:
th-cam.com/video/qvUdepG8Uiw/w-d-xo.html
I hope you the best success!!! You may be interested in P R O M O S M!