Actually Padmavati existed. I have been to the rooms where she took bath in Chittorgarh Fort and have also seen the room where Padmavati stood and looked at the mirror and Khilji saw her reflection.
Rani Padmini was real. She was as real as allahuddin. She lived in the 13th century and died in the jauhar just like Maharana Ratan rawal sa on the battlefield. Jauhar happened many times and its been proven.
This happened in real. As per Archeological survey of India has a designated place in the fort where this Johar ceremony was performed. Many Indian historian has also proven Padmavati existence.
@@priyak7384 the fort has a johar sthal with remains of johar....and also a padmavati mahal I don't think we need more of evidence.....also our oral tradition is very strong and saving our history....do you think muslim rulers would ever document the rajput act of valour......the chittor has these stories in its heart
@@priyak7384 Problem with the people like you, Romila Thabar and other Librandus is that; even though we have so many Hero Stones spread all over the India, their history written by Bardai or Barot community; which you can trace it with the locations and could match many of these with the archaeological evidences - still you are not ready acknowledging that. Khilji dynasty has ruled India for 30 years, starting from around 1400 AD. And his evidences of destruction, massacre, forced conversions spread all over Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana and Gujarat. Even the Archaeological Survey Of India is putting big Notice Boards at every historical places in India; but you don't even educate yourself by reading them.
You may not Believe in Rani Padmini but it wasn't only Jauhar of Indian History. There were several. It used to be accompanied with the Saka where men go out of the fort to fight till their last breath.
@@priyak7384 1st of all, Sati and Jauhar are different things. 2nd, Who says we are proud of that. It was a travesty. Not an accomplishment. We only salute to the fact that they held their respect utmost. 3rd, Would've you liked it if someone would make you or your loved ones a slave. How slavery is better than death. 4th, and before you react on the 3rd...you should know that you can't study history in present context. It's like instead of a bike, you buy a horse for your first day of college. 5th, You should've read my comment. It says all. Let me dumb it down for you. My only intention was to make sure they don't think our (Even you're included) history fake just because of some debate over some event in history. My comment shows their struggle. However, I always be proud of the fact that they chose death over slavery. It's because of them, both men and women, that you and I can debate over internet... P. S. No hard feelings 🤘
@@priyak7384 its quite easy to jude the earlier times by 21st century morality. If it was forced, then absolutely it was bad. And see, we don't practice sati now bcs we recognized its bad. But johar was only done in times of war. The men did saka, or fought till their death amd the women did johar, so both of the parties end their lives rather than live in slavery and dishonour.
Padmavati really existed known as Rani Padmini historians will give answers based on books but my great grand father shown me the sword used by my great grand fathers grandfather. So he know the ground reality. He tought me the story of course there are few changes in movie but johor happened
@@nithinsingh8264 it's awesome to hear this. I visited Chittorgarh fort last week.. I was moved to tears.. The Padmavati palace and the place where she stood at the window. It's all so real.. it does shivers down your spine.. I always am enamored by history. . And the beauty of Chittorgarh was beyond beautiful.. you can't describe it. ..
The cinematography of this film is on the different level... Makes you feel that you have stepped into a different world....one of the special scenes was when they showed the soldiers and women running in turns.... It's not because the women know the short cut.... Actually, when the women through coals and set fire in front of the soldiers... They shut the doors again, so ranveer singh or allaudin took a different long route but the soldiers destroyed the doors and came rushing in.... And the specialty of showing them run in turns is that both the soldiers and the rajput women are symbolised as warriors... The soldiers are running because they are rushing into the fort in order to claim the defeated territory and the women.... While the women are warriors who are running because( mind you, they are not running away), they are running towards the fire to sacrifice themselves and they are the true warriors there because they are defeating the soldiers in their own way.... The are not fighting and winning physically but symbolically.... Respect!!!!!
Correction here - your observation regarding the 'long route' and the 'short route' was spot-on. The architecture of these forts always contained 'trick routes' - the long routes - situated in the outermost perimeter. A devilishly clever strategy to ensure that anyone trying to breach them would, figuratively, take 'forever' to reach the 'inside'... A delaying tactic... While the residents of the fortress could use the 'shortest route', which only they knew, to 'escape tunnels' or in this case, the site of 'Johar kund'
No no, in the scenes people got confused between Aditi rao hydari and Deepika Padukone since they kinda look similar and the clip was very short too in the teaser! That's the reason Rajasthanis revolted that way and padmavati is not a fictional character! The palace she stayed, the place where she commited jauhar all exists even today in Rajasthan!
@@sunilpia yes it was a misconception, but yes again bollywood is knows for twisting up facts and glorifying anti Hindu elements, so that's pretty much it 😁
Nope, Sanjay Leele Bansali distorted the history in Bajorio Mastani movie. Rajputs predicted he will do the same for this movie too. That's why they didn't wanted this movie by Bollywood in the first place.
Yes, why don't you visit Chittorgarh fort in Rajasthan. Have a look at Padmavati palace,,or Padmini palace. Have a look at the steps she ran down and did Johar. If you go there, you will get shivers down your spine. Please don't insult the Rajput or the history of India.
@@mrkslva4231 that's a common misconception she is from present day sirohi which was called sinholi/sinhala back then and people/european historian confused it with sinhalese people of Ceylon in reality she wasn't a Sri Lankan but a rajasthani rajput of Bhati Royal House.
@@vladtheimpaler4476 ok but don't know what's the misconception because nowhere on the internet mentions her being indian. But informational books websites( even indian ones ) mention her as being sri lankan. I'm not saying you are wrong. But the only places I've seen people saying she's indian is from TH-cam comments sections only.
Also she was the grand mother of Maharana pratap ji. Uh can read more abt this on int. The jauhar performed by padmavati ranisa was the first ever jauhar performed in the whole mewar/mewad region. I'm actually from mewad (chittod) so i know this .
Excuse me, my friends (Sunil & pia) actually you don't know the real history. It's not your mistake. Maa Padmavati existed . We Respect our माँ Padmavati as a goddess, it's not just a story, it's the greatest valour and sacrifice for the country. माँ Padmavati lives in our hearts. Thanks. वंदेमातरम् ॥जय जगदम्बे ॥🐅🔱🙏🌹
She was also a princess from Sri Lanka before she married to Indian King. So Sri Lankans claim her as well (as they should). Also Jauhars are a historical fact so regardless of your take on Rani Padmavati it's still a depiction true to history.
@@Priya-cm3tr No priya ji , you are completely wrong. History is a subject which is based on facts, proofs. Historical facts means-- शिलालेख , ancient scripture, coins , etc.( first history , not Romila Thapar history) From 6 century to 12 century, it's the period of Gurjar( गुर्जर) dynasty. We Gurjar and Rajpoot have some issues on History. But Historians are very clear, that period was Gurjar dynasty. I Request you, please read some great Historians, like , **k.m.munshi ji ( Glory that was Gurjar desa ) Baij nath puri ji's --- (The History of Gurjara - pratiharas ) And must read Baij nath puri's research on Gurjar dynasty in the University of Oxford. Have you any proof of Gurjar history in sri lanka . Please mention me any ancient scripture. There is big lobby of left wing Historians, who distorted our indian history. They glorified mugal History, because they are hungry for chicken beryani . Because they dislike our Indian values, culture. Thanks🙏🙏⚘️🌻🌿🍁🍇
@@priyak7384 Don't worry, she is our mother , we will manage. History demands facts, not abusive language. You know nothing about history, no problem, go to a ice-cream cafe and enjoy **Black Diamond. 🍧🍨🤗💞
Thats the problem with most of the people who questions history of indans but believe everything about mughals, britishers etc There are several stories which are true that people haven’t heard of “thanks to our education system “for teaching us history of everything but not about own heroes 🇮🇳
This actually was real story.. I myself I'm Rajput..There are more than enough proofs of jauhar & rani padmavati..there were many jauhar similar to this & it's really painful that it happened
@@priyak7384 bhai tere ko koi Kam nahin hai kya why you are commenting on every single comment that she didn't existed get a job you call other people jobless but I think you yourself is jobless ... Tere kahane se that Rani padmawati didn't existed jhooth sach nahin ho jaega because she did existed and it is a fact which can't be changed by self proclaimed archaeologist and historians like you 😂🤣 Know get lost Clown 🤡
@@priyak7384 lol shut your mouth . Need to read about the Chittor mission of khilji and it is clearly mentioned that jauhar done in that mission not only single jauhar many jauhar done by Rajput queens
No, this is totally true story...There are even her museums and the fort with the bundles of proof of her existence...Pia was totally ignorant and fell for the theories on internet instead of doing some research.
People say it is a reality but the historians say that it is not true...... In the palace there is literally a "Jauhar Sthal" that means the place where jauhar happened so if it didn't happened so why that place exist and also they found ashes evidence in that pool of Jauhar but now that pool has been covered by the heritage people and historians didn't found any evidence for that jauhar
In history, there was a siege of Chittaurgarh, led by Alauddin Khilji in 1303. There was a battle between Alauddin Khilji and Raja Ratnasimha. However, the motive for the siege is contested between historians. The Sufi Poet Malik Mohammed Jayasi wrote the poem "Padmaavat" where he wrote a fictional story about the lust of king Alauddin to capture Rani Padmini. But the real history chroniclers of Alauddin Khilji, namely Amir Khusrau, Ziauddin Barani, and Abdul Malik Isami do not mention Rani Padmini, and say that this siege was motivated by the expansionist nature of Alauddin Khilji (They were the court historians of Alauddin Khilji, so they would know). Anyways, Alauddin besieged the fort for 8 months, when he repeatedly attempted to scale the hill, but was repulsed back. In the end, he brought out big siege machines (probably inspired by Mongol siege engines or maybe those were all the rage at that time) and pelted the fort walls, weakening them and making is easy to enter. Either way, Alauddin entered the fort on 26 August 1303, and livid at the stubborn resistance of the king, ordered the inhabitants massacred. As per Amir Khusrau (Alauddin's official Historian), around 30,000 people were put to death. Coming to the Jauhar part, the historians at that time (Khusrau, Barani) did not chronicle the jauhar happen, nor did they chronicle what had happened to the queen. So some historians believe that jauhar may have happened there, and the queen and her entourage committed jauhar, except it was not documented by the official historians (Amir Khusrau and Ziauddin Barani). That lack of documentation (of Jauhar) would make sense if Alauddin's siege was motivated by a desire to conquer the kingdom. In that case, the historians would record the capture of the kingdom and would not bother to record the events of jauhar, as the queen was not the primary objective of the battle.
@@prabhatsourya3883 I understand what you are saying and I also know that you are really intelligent (really I am not joking) but one thing that I remember from the movie was Alauddin buring the pages of history....... I personally think that if a author is writing for a King, so he may not write against the king or about the lust that he had and in the end he didn't even got what he wanted. That's why I think we should focus on some poet who were not the court members of the King because they would have wrote about King fearlessly (that's just my opinion)
@@yugampandey4600 I wholeheartedly agree with that point. But the thing is, even the later rajput historians have dismissed the theory of Alauddin Khilji's lust for Rani Padmini. They too believe Padmaavat as a fictional piece, and the real motive for besieging Chittorgarh was an expansionist policy. But the rajput historians are unambiguous about the jauhar, and say that it indeed happened. P. S. The reason why many historians believed the siege to be an expansionist policy was that Alauddin Khilji was running multiple campaigns across the Mewar region of Rajasthan, having conquered Ranthambhore the year before. Chittaurgarh was sheltering the rebels who fled from Ranthambhore and other conquered regions. Also, Alauddin Khilji might have asked for Rani Padmini to humiliate the Rajput king, but many historians (including Rajput historians) still claim that Rani Padmini was not the actual motive for the siege.
And this was the first jauhar ever done in mewar region Futher after 3 more big jauhars took place in mewar And last last jauhar was done by the 6th queen of maharana pratap after he died and Akbar was after her.
I’ve waited for another reaction to this scene by anybody……. Thank you for doing this, great reaction and attention to detail and background and great reaction…..
I don't know from What type of historians you have gathered your knowledge that Rani Padmavati didn't existed she did existed those historians who paint her as non existent are mostly Western historians because they try to paint every Indian historical event as myth and there are also some Indian historians who walk on the same path as these western historians But it's a fact that she existed there are evidences of the Johar as well as of the palace and many more and I think that much is enough to prove her existence ....
The pallu/veil you spoke about.. It is usually worn to cover the top of the head by married women or in some places women after a certain age to show respect in front of men or elders present around them.. If you noticed it was not just deepika who wore it but every other lady there had a veil on their head.. It is a common practice in some parts of India.. Also.. I've heard this is a true story as that place still exists.. Stories say that the cries of those thousands of women can still be felt nd it haunts people.. Not sure how much of that is true but I've heard about it..
Rani padmavati really existed. The story is real. You can also google about it... She was so beautiful that everyone wanted to have her in their life. Her father married her to a powerful king. The jauhar story is also real.
Veiling for was a custom for ALL, not for royalty alone. ( Every woman is veiled in the video) . The veil falls off because she intends to 'wear the veil of fire', not for her hair to 'fly'😂. Recall the first scene in the sequence where her husband is pronounced dead, and she says 'the time has come to wear the veil of fire '
Today I am soo happy pia and sunil my second year result had came I got 963 for 1000 marks and this is my favourite movie and favourite sceane Thanks for doing
The answer to your question regarding the 'pallu' is in your video, at 3.37 - it's time to Don the veil of fire 'pallu' is a veil... It had to slide off not for aesthetic reasons, but because that veil had to come off so that the 'last veil' - the fire of Johar - could take its place. P. S. In Hinduism, fire is mostly associated with sacrifices that are required to obtain purity of heart and mind. Resulting in attainment of 'enlightenment' 😊
Yes Queen Padmavati existed. I don't understand which historians or book you had gone through. There are many more incidents in Indian history related to Johar. And Director of the movie was slapped because he was portraying the story for gaining Commercial benefits which leads people like you to miss understand our culture and traditions on the name of freedom to expression. He was trying to film a dream Seen of Allaudin Khilgi with Queen Padmavati which is intolerable for the respect of the lady who sacrifice her self so that she will be not even touched by some other guy. We really respect our culture and our history. Yes a Poem book (kavya) named Padmavat has the only written proof of that. FYI Every incident was recorded after its happening. And the first thing any invader do is to burn the all historical records. So singing song or poems was the only way in that time of recording the events. Since that time there was no youtube or email technology to make a records. I request you to please visit india specially Rajasthan where you can find all the archeological & historian proofs. Related to Johar, Padmavati or Alludin Khiljee. Dont be Judgmental and put any view without knowing everything specially related to History. Goggle is not History.
I don't believe all this was a just imaginery stories. This was a folklore passed on for centuries . There r many many dastardly acts that happened and r passed on in songs and tales of that particular region. Atrocities by Islamic as well as by Christian massioneries in India. But historians r not always fully right abt their facts.
The seige of chitorgarh by Akbar resulted in Jauhar. Please look up the historical fact. padmavati represents all those women who died so they wouldnt have a fate that led to rape and enslavement. They burnt their bodies because the savages were known to rape and descrate the dead too. It's an issue of bodily autonomy. They knew the savages would not differentiate between young or old, dead or alove. Hence, agni kund. Brave women!
what is the reality of Islam? Islam is not this. Islam is about Peace and serving and surrending to Allah and not go and murder others or rape women. Research about Islam & then talk. Just bc one man or a couple did something atrocious doesn‘t mean Islam is at fault.
I dont think they show it in the movie, but in some parts ( im not sure if it was in rashput society, sorry not know how to write it). Women could learn to figth, and they would be figthing with the men. Also i think i read they realize jauhar with their weddings outfits, thats because all are wearing red.
As an Indian woman I feel more pained that these women felt they had no choice but to kill themselves because our traditions have ingrained in us that being raped makes us lesser than who we used to be and that we're too weak to fight against men. You could see they had a small army of women inside the fort but instead of picking up the trishuls and anything else that could've served as a weapon, they just gave up. This scene always gives me goosebumps and it takes exceptional courage to walk into a blazing fire but it still pains me to see so many women just give up and not die fighting.
You'd rather be raped and enslaved till you die ?? Or convert to another religion? So weird This is reality. No matter they'd have lost. It's better to die with dignity. "Also the raped makes us lesser is such a weird lens of seeing this scene". You've no idea about the horrors of rape and enslavement. You're disgusting
@sittingduck I think it is just the different perspective of seeing the history or this particular event because you can't judge past incidents on the basis of today's morality it was not like they have not fought Rani Padmavati as well as the other woman fought in their own way.... And I don't think so in our history anywhere it is taught that women are weak because when it comes to Queen bravery then in Indian history there have also been queens like Rani Lakshmi Bai and many more Queen warriors who are not taught in our school textbooks that's why you don't know about them ...
@sittingduck and also there could be one more reason why they perform the Johar and not did one to one battle because the Mughals were also known for raping the dead bodies
Total there happen 3 johar , one padmavati, another karnavati and last maharana prataap wife too...... The first johar in India happen during Alexander invasion, 2nd during mohammad qasim and 3rd by padmavati queen... And one during the time of akbar too... And last johar was done due to aurangjeb.
This is a real story. In actual story, after jahur the remaining men would smear the ash on their bodies and go on a last stand off to kill as many invaders as possible. So as to weaken them for next Hindu kingdom that would face them. It is said that the burning bodies could be smelled for miles letting the other kingdoms know of the sacrifice brave Rajputs women have made.
I find this debate of whether it really happened or not . Was it true ? very stupid. My student asked me if Ramayana really took place. How does it matter? The main thing is the lessons we learn from it. Rama, at a time when multiple marriages were common, especially for men, showed that having one wife is the ideal. Hey his own father had three wives. So let us not get into the rabbit hole of fact and fiction. Let us learn from all this and feel proud about our culture.
Why they did jauhar nd not just killed themselves? Becoz these malekshas ( the M inva.. rs ) used to practice necrophilia. These brave women don't wanted even their dead bodies to be touched by them . Jauhar happened atleast 3 times( as far as I remember) in Indian history . Jauhar never happened when there was fight between hindu kings or with anyone except with M ... becoz hindus/ Rajputs never used to take other's women. This was kinda unwritten rule ( cultural effect) that nobody will touch / disrespect other's women. But in case of M..... it was different becoz we all know what they used to do ....
Your research is wrong. Because of padmavati's juhar . Still now she is worshipped as goddess in rajasthan. Rajput's juhar culture is real. Padmavati did juhar with all women to protect their dignity in reality. That is why Padmavati is goddess for Rajput.
In this scene I don't really like how we never see what happens to the ladies who were throwing the coals, we don't know for sure if they somehow killed the guys with the fire attack & got away to join the others or were possibly massacred by the men if they made it through the fire
i think it is important to understand that a *LOT* of the history of the indian subcontinent has been destroyed by the invading forces. especially considering the inclusion of urdu in devnagri languages.
Sis, I am a rajput from bloodline of Maharana Pratap's vansh or you can say vansh so as pure Indian rajput I know that symbols exist because they existed in this untamed world and who the hell are these historians who told you or you have see their interview that they are myth. This is good of everyone in this world saying that hindu Gods and Goddesses are myth and now Indian history is also myth if it is then you all who think in this way are myth enough to leave this untamed world. Sis please tell me the link of those interviews or name of those fucking historians.
@@sunilpia of course sis, but as an Indian I would suggest you to research properly before making videos especially on history and mythology of every country but for Indian history and mythology be careful. We are way too emotional for this. BTW it's OK.
It was a real story.....and our rajput's pride and only this.....there are several story like this...so you are wrong.....it's a true story of our nation 💪💪💪
Indeed, when the Marathas-who were famous for violating and selling Rajput women-attacked and conquered the cities of Jaipur and Dhundhar, many Rajput women chose to end their lives by committing jauhar rather than submit to the outrages that were sure to be inflicted upon them by the Marathas.
Are you out of your mind what type of marathas are you talking about from where did you get your history knowledge ..... Even when the marathas won any war then they never made slaves the woman of the defeated one's ..... Get your history right WhatsApp University
You are wrong...Queen Padmini belonged to the family of Maharana Pratap and the lake palace in Udaipur belongs to her descendants..You didnt do a proper research..if you had then you would have known that she is not a legend and which family she belonged to..her desdendants that is the royal family of Udaipur even confirmed her existence int their interviews on this movie..now obviously the family itself would certainly know about their anscestry..and Rani Padmini's jauhar is not the onky one..Thst family of Queen Padmavati has a histpry of Jauhar committed by the royal woman of their family..you need to research into that particular family Queen Padmavati was married into..you will be able to see their whole anscestry
Dude, you guys got the whole thing wrong. Please acknowledge this. You are saying things with so much confidence and it’s all wrong. Ashes with unmelted gems have been found all over India. This was happening around India in that time. It’s a huge part of the history. You guys are yuck for not amending this or putting out a redacted comment. Gross
Actually some historians think she existed...I would like you to comment your sources on this video...when u say historians those are English officers who used to rule India...they have made many claims that have been proven wrong in the long run...
its a false information that she never existed , she existed for sure, these islamic muslim rulers destroyed majority of historic doucuments written about shit they did to women to small hindu empires ......but as its said history is not just written in documents............its a real story she existed for sure just go and see chittorgarh fort
Actually Padmavati existed. I have been to the rooms where she took bath in Chittorgarh Fort and have also seen the room where Padmavati stood and looked at the mirror and Khilji saw her reflection.
👍🏽👍🏽
Queen Padmavati. pls pay respects during mentioning her.
@@bonnythelion abey haad
Khilji sawed reflection of servant/Dassi. Rajputs women never remove their veil/odhni infront of stranger males.
@himana vattikonda Ya that place is still there.
You will see it once you visit remains of Chittorgarh Fort
Rani Padmini was real. She was as real as allahuddin.
She lived in the 13th century and died in the jauhar just like Maharana Ratan rawal sa on the battlefield.
Jauhar happened many times and its been proven.
This happened in real. As per Archeological survey of India has a designated place in the fort where this Johar ceremony was performed. Many Indian historian has also proven Padmavati existence.
👍🏽👍🏽
It's only your wishful thinking. Not reality
@@priyak7384 the fort has a johar sthal with remains of johar....and also a padmavati mahal I don't think we need more of evidence.....also our oral tradition is very strong and saving our history....do you think muslim rulers would ever document the rajput act of valour......the chittor has these stories in its heart
@@priyak7384 get lost
@@priyak7384 Problem with the people like you, Romila Thabar and other Librandus is that; even though we have so many Hero Stones spread all over the India, their history written by Bardai or Barot community; which you can trace it with the locations and could match many of these with the archaeological evidences - still you are not ready acknowledging that. Khilji dynasty has ruled India for 30 years, starting from around 1400 AD. And his evidences of destruction, massacre, forced conversions spread all over Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana and Gujarat. Even the Archaeological Survey Of India is putting big Notice Boards at every historical places in India; but you don't even educate yourself by reading them.
You may not Believe in Rani Padmini but it wasn't only Jauhar of Indian History. There were several. It used to be accompanied with the Saka where men go out of the fort to fight till their last breath.
👍🏽👍🏽🥺
Murdering women in the name of sati or jauhaar is something to be ashamed of. Not something to be proud of..
@@priyak7384 1st of all, Sati and Jauhar are different things.
2nd, Who says we are proud of that. It was a travesty. Not an accomplishment. We only salute to the fact that they held their respect utmost.
3rd, Would've you liked it if someone would make you or your loved ones a slave. How slavery is better than death.
4th, and before you react on the 3rd...you should know that you can't study history in present context. It's like instead of a bike, you buy a horse for your first day of college.
5th, You should've read my comment. It says all. Let me dumb it down for you. My only intention was to make sure they don't think our (Even you're included) history fake just because of some debate over some event in history. My comment shows their struggle.
However, I always be proud of the fact that they chose death over slavery. It's because of them, both men and women, that you and I can debate over internet...
P. S. No hard feelings 🤘
@@priyak7384 it's not murdering of women. She did it to Protect her pride and dignity
@@priyak7384 its quite easy to jude the earlier times by 21st century morality. If it was forced, then absolutely it was bad. And see, we don't practice sati now bcs we recognized its bad. But johar was only done in times of war. The men did saka, or fought till their death amd the women did johar, so both of the parties end their lives rather than live in slavery and dishonour.
Padmavati really existed known as Rani Padmini historians will give answers based on books but my great grand father shown me the sword used by my great grand fathers grandfather. So he know the ground reality. He tought me the story of course there are few changes in movie but johor happened
@@nithinsingh8264 it's awesome to hear this. I visited Chittorgarh fort last week.. I was moved to tears..
The Padmavati palace and the place where she stood at the window. It's all so real.. it does shivers down your spine..
I always am enamored by history. . And the beauty of Chittorgarh was beyond beautiful.. you can't describe it. ..
I'm crying for this.... Scene😭😭😭😭... Most fav......this movie real story
Awww love the film!
Ss me too😔
The cinematography of this film is on the different level... Makes you feel that you have stepped into a different world....one of the special scenes was when they showed the soldiers and women running in turns.... It's not because the women know the short cut.... Actually, when the women through coals and set fire in front of the soldiers... They shut the doors again, so ranveer singh or allaudin took a different long route but the soldiers destroyed the doors and came rushing in.... And the specialty of showing them run in turns is that both the soldiers and the rajput women are symbolised as warriors... The soldiers are running because they are rushing into the fort in order to claim the defeated territory and the women.... While the women are warriors who are running because( mind you, they are not running away), they are running towards the fire to sacrifice themselves and they are the true warriors there because they are defeating the soldiers in their own way.... The are not fighting and winning physically but symbolically.... Respect!!!!!
Very insightful!
Correction here - your observation regarding the 'long route' and the 'short route' was spot-on. The architecture of these forts always contained 'trick routes' - the long routes - situated in the outermost perimeter. A devilishly clever strategy to ensure that anyone trying to breach them would, figuratively, take 'forever' to reach the 'inside'... A delaying tactic... While the residents of the fortress could use the 'shortest route', which only they knew, to 'escape tunnels' or in this case, the site of 'Johar kund'
They didn't killed khilji becoz they wanted to make him realise that they had defeated him.
That’s true 👍🏽
No no, in the scenes people got confused between Aditi rao hydari and Deepika Padukone since they kinda look similar and the clip was very short too in the teaser! That's the reason Rajasthanis revolted that way and padmavati is not a fictional character! The palace she stayed, the place where she commited jauhar all exists even today in Rajasthan!
Ohhh that explains it! Cuz nobody will put a romance scene between them. Poor Sanjay took a slap for no reason.
@@sunilpia yes it was a misconception, but yes again bollywood is knows for twisting up facts and glorifying anti Hindu elements, so that's pretty much it 😁
Nope, Sanjay Leele Bansali distorted the history in Bajorio Mastani movie. Rajputs predicted he will do the same for this movie too. That's why they didn't wanted this movie by Bollywood in the first place.
It is funny that you are saying that she never existed... And that too with such confidence!
We must have looked into the wrong source, no offence 🙂
Yes, why don't you visit Chittorgarh fort in Rajasthan. Have a look at Padmavati palace,,or Padmini palace. Have a look at the steps she ran down and did Johar.
If you go there, you will get shivers down your spine.
Please don't insult the Rajput or the history of India.
This is a real story....!
Padmavati is from the family tree of maharana pratap.
they dont now shit man its about 1303 AD they should google it
Padmavati is Sri lankan
@@mrkslva4231 that's a common misconception she is from present day sirohi which was called sinholi/sinhala back then and people/european historian confused it with sinhalese people of Ceylon in reality she wasn't a Sri Lankan but a rajasthani rajput of Bhati Royal House.
@@vladtheimpaler4476 ok but don't know what's the misconception because nowhere on the internet mentions her being indian. But informational books websites( even indian ones ) mention her as being sri lankan. I'm not saying you are wrong. But the only places I've seen people saying she's indian is from TH-cam comments sections only.
Also she was the grand mother of Maharana pratap ji. Uh can read more abt this on int. The jauhar performed by padmavati ranisa was the first ever jauhar performed in the whole mewar/mewad region.
I'm actually from mewad (chittod) so i know this .
Excuse me, my friends (Sunil & pia) actually you don't know the real history. It's not your mistake.
Maa Padmavati existed . We Respect our माँ Padmavati as a goddess, it's not just a story, it's the greatest valour and sacrifice for the country. माँ Padmavati lives in our hearts. Thanks.
वंदेमातरम् ॥जय जगदम्बे ॥🐅🔱🙏🌹
Thank you so much for letting us know 😊
She was also a princess from Sri Lanka before she married to Indian King. So Sri Lankans claim her as well (as they should). Also Jauhars are a historical fact so regardless of your take on Rani Padmavati it's still a depiction true to history.
@@Priya-cm3tr No priya ji , you are completely wrong. History is a subject which is based on facts, proofs.
Historical facts means-- शिलालेख , ancient scripture, coins , etc.( first history , not Romila Thapar history)
From 6 century to 12 century, it's the period of Gurjar( गुर्जर) dynasty.
We Gurjar and Rajpoot have some issues on History. But Historians are very clear, that period was Gurjar dynasty.
I Request you, please read some great Historians, like , **k.m.munshi ji
( Glory that was Gurjar desa )
Baij nath puri ji's ---
(The History of Gurjara - pratiharas )
And must read Baij nath puri's research on Gurjar dynasty in the University of Oxford.
Have you any proof of Gurjar history in sri lanka .
Please mention me any ancient scripture.
There is big lobby of left wing Historians, who distorted our indian history.
They glorified mugal History, because they are hungry for chicken beryani .
Because they dislike our Indian values, culture. Thanks🙏🙏⚘️🌻🌿🍁🍇
Lol. Ma padmini .. cringing so hard.
@@priyak7384 Don't worry, she is our mother , we will manage.
History demands facts, not abusive language.
You know nothing about history, no problem, go to a ice-cream cafe and enjoy **Black Diamond. 🍧🍨🤗💞
Thats the problem with most of the people who questions history of indans but believe everything about mughals, britishers etc There are several stories which are true that people haven’t heard of “thanks to our education system “for teaching us history of everything but not about own heroes 🇮🇳
👍🙏🌺
This is our History
This is sacrifice for dignity
This is our MOTHER Padmini🙏
Jay Bhawani.
This actually was real story.. I myself I'm Rajput..There are more than enough proofs of jauhar & rani padmavati..there were many jauhar similar to this & it's really painful that it happened
Even historians don't claim about her existance with the confidence you do . Lol. Desparate fools.
@@priyak7384 bhai tere ko koi Kam nahin hai kya why you are commenting on every single comment that she didn't existed get a job you call other people jobless but I think you yourself is jobless ... Tere kahane se that Rani padmawati didn't existed jhooth sach nahin ho jaega because she did existed and it is a fact which can't be changed by self proclaimed archaeologist and historians like you 😂🤣
Know get lost Clown 🤡
@@priyak7384and I don't think so he is a desperate fool but you are 🤡
who is so desperate to prove a historical characters non existence
Fool 🤣😂
@@priyak7384 lol shut your mouth . Need to read about the Chittor mission of khilji and it is clearly mentioned that jauhar done in that mission not only single jauhar many jauhar done by Rajput queens
No, this is totally true story...There are even her museums and the fort with the bundles of proof of her existence...Pia was totally ignorant and fell for the theories on internet instead of doing some research.
People say it is a reality but the historians say that it is not true...... In the palace there is literally a "Jauhar Sthal" that means the place where jauhar happened so if it didn't happened so why that place exist and also they found ashes evidence in that pool of Jauhar but now that pool has been covered by the heritage people and historians didn't found any evidence for that jauhar
In history, there was a siege of Chittaurgarh, led by Alauddin Khilji in 1303. There was a battle between Alauddin Khilji and Raja Ratnasimha. However, the motive for the siege is contested between historians. The Sufi Poet Malik Mohammed Jayasi wrote the poem "Padmaavat" where he wrote a fictional story about the lust of king Alauddin to capture Rani Padmini.
But the real history chroniclers of Alauddin Khilji, namely Amir Khusrau, Ziauddin Barani, and Abdul Malik Isami do not mention Rani Padmini, and say that this siege was motivated by the expansionist nature of Alauddin Khilji (They were the court historians of Alauddin Khilji, so they would know).
Anyways, Alauddin besieged the fort for 8 months, when he repeatedly attempted to scale the hill, but was repulsed back. In the end, he brought out big siege machines (probably inspired by Mongol siege engines or maybe those were all the rage at that time) and pelted the fort walls, weakening them and making is easy to enter.
Either way, Alauddin entered the fort on 26 August 1303, and livid at the stubborn resistance of the king, ordered the inhabitants massacred. As per Amir Khusrau (Alauddin's official Historian), around 30,000 people were put to death.
Coming to the Jauhar part, the historians at that time (Khusrau, Barani) did not chronicle the jauhar happen, nor did they chronicle what had happened to the queen. So some historians believe that jauhar may have happened there, and the queen and her entourage committed jauhar, except it was not documented by the official historians (Amir Khusrau and Ziauddin Barani).
That lack of documentation (of Jauhar) would make sense if Alauddin's siege was motivated by a desire to conquer the kingdom. In that case, the historians would record the capture of the kingdom and would not bother to record the events of jauhar, as the queen was not the primary objective of the battle.
@@prabhatsourya3883 I understand what you are saying and I also know that you are really intelligent (really I am not joking) but one thing that I remember from the movie was Alauddin buring the pages of history....... I personally think that if a author is writing for a King, so he may not write against the king or about the lust that he had and in the end he didn't even got what he wanted. That's why I think we should focus on some poet who were not the court members of the King because they would have wrote about King fearlessly (that's just my opinion)
@@yugampandey4600 I wholeheartedly agree with that point. But the thing is, even the later rajput historians have dismissed the theory of Alauddin Khilji's lust for Rani Padmini. They too believe Padmaavat as a fictional piece, and the real motive for besieging Chittorgarh was an expansionist policy. But the rajput historians are unambiguous about the jauhar, and say that it indeed happened.
P. S. The reason why many historians believed the siege to be an expansionist policy was that Alauddin Khilji was running multiple campaigns across the Mewar region of Rajasthan, having conquered Ranthambhore the year before. Chittaurgarh was sheltering the rebels who fled from Ranthambhore and other conquered regions.
Also, Alauddin Khilji might have asked for Rani Padmini to humiliate the Rajput king, but many historians (including Rajput historians) still claim that Rani Padmini was not the actual motive for the siege.
@@prabhatsourya3883 bhai agar sachme Rani Padmini kay baare mein jaanna hain toh ooski research Sri Lanka mein bhi honi chhahiye kyuki woh wahiki thi.
@@amitbhople1864 really she was from Sri Lanka ?
Devi padmavati actually existed, historians have been hiding this, and now it is on record
I legitly cried for this scene.. Amazing
And this was the first jauhar ever done in mewar region
Futher after 3 more big jauhars took place in mewar
And last last jauhar was done by the 6th queen of maharana pratap after he died and Akbar was after her.
I’ve waited for another reaction to this scene by anybody…….
Thank you for doing this, great reaction and attention to detail and background and great reaction…..
Thank you heaps! Glad you enjoyed 😊
There were 3 Jauhars in Rajasthan across different timeline. This was not the only one.
3??!! So sad 😢
I don't know from What type of historians you have gathered your knowledge that Rani Padmavati didn't existed she did existed
those historians who paint her as non existent are mostly Western historians because they try to paint every Indian historical event as myth and there are also some Indian historians who walk on the same path as these western historians
But it's a fact that she existed there are evidences of the Johar as well as of the palace and many more and I think that much is enough to prove her existence ....
It is not Mythology 🔥
It is Indian History 🙏
Hindustani history is full of such great queens 🙏
Padmaavati may or may not have existed, but there were many other queens who DID commit jauhar due to the same reasons as depicted in the movie.
👍🏽👍🏽
Maa padmini ham rajputon ki aan baan or shan hai
💯
The pallu/veil you spoke about.. It is usually worn to cover the top of the head by married women or in some places women after a certain age to show respect in front of men or elders present around them.. If you noticed it was not just deepika who wore it but every other lady there had a veil on their head.. It is a common practice in some parts of India..
Also.. I've heard this is a true story as that place still exists.. Stories say that the cries of those thousands of women can still be felt nd it haunts people.. Not sure how much of that is true but I've heard about it..
Very insightful 😊👍🏽
I love how the men of war react without thought. The women have deliberative intent and move calmly towards their destiny. The calm wins.
This is a true incident from India in which 16000 women of India committed Jauhar 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳😭😭😢😢🙏🏻🙏🏻
16000. of them committed to jauhar, won't forget them!!!!!
This is our history and oride and we have been taught and told in our school
Padmavati existed she is our pride
Rani padmavati really existed. The story is real. You can also google about it... She was so beautiful that everyone wanted to have her in their life. Her father married her to a powerful king. The jauhar story is also real.
Veiling for was a custom for ALL, not for royalty alone. ( Every woman is veiled in the video) . The veil falls off because she intends to 'wear the veil of fire', not for her hair to 'fly'😂. Recall the first scene in the sequence where her husband is pronounced dead, and she says 'the time has come to wear the veil of fire '
Today I am soo happy pia and sunil my second year result had came I got 963 for 1000 marks and this is my favourite movie and favourite sceane Thanks for doing
Congratulations 🥳👏🏽❤️
The answer to your question regarding the 'pallu' is in your video, at 3.37 - it's time to Don the veil of fire
'pallu' is a veil... It had to slide off not for aesthetic reasons, but because that veil had to come off so that the 'last veil' - the fire of Johar - could take its place.
P. S. In Hinduism, fire is mostly associated with sacrifices that are required to obtain purity of heart and mind. Resulting in attainment of 'enlightenment'
😊
Yes Queen Padmavati existed.
I don't understand which historians or book you had gone through.
There are many more incidents in Indian history related to Johar.
And Director of the movie was slapped because he was portraying the story for gaining Commercial benefits which leads people like you to miss understand our culture and traditions on the name of freedom to expression. He was trying to film a dream Seen of Allaudin Khilgi with Queen Padmavati which is intolerable for the respect of the lady who sacrifice her self so that she will be not even touched by some other guy. We really respect our culture and our history.
Yes a Poem book (kavya) named Padmavat has the only written proof of that. FYI Every incident was recorded after its happening. And the first thing any invader do is to burn the all historical records. So singing song or poems was the only way in that time of recording the events. Since that time there was no youtube or email technology to make a records.
I request you to please visit india specially Rajasthan where you can find all the archeological & historian proofs. Related to Johar, Padmavati or Alludin Khiljee.
Dont be Judgmental and put any view without knowing everything specially related to History.
Goggle is not History.
👍🏽👍🏽
16:20 its weared in north india (mostly western Indian states , rajasthan , gujarath, maharastra some part of their neighbouring states)
Interesting!
She really existed
My hometown is the same place where there current family the royal family of mewar lives.
I don't believe all this was a just imaginery stories. This was a folklore passed on for centuries . There r many many dastardly acts that happened and r passed on in songs and tales of that particular region. Atrocities by Islamic as well as by Christian massioneries in India. But historians r not always fully right abt their facts.
True.. history is written by rulers or oppressors so it’s always from their perspective.
Yups distorians like Habib ,Guha ,thabar and Majumdar
i think it is based on true story.....not the whole movie...but JOHAR Is there happen in every war....👍
Every war!! That’s insane!
Sunil and pia your reaction is really great and I am big fan . One thing Sunil face cut like Indian🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thank you so much 😊😊❤️❤️
🤩🤩🤩
The seige of chitorgarh by Akbar resulted in Jauhar. Please look up the historical fact. padmavati represents all those women who died so they wouldnt have a fate that led to rape and enslavement. They burnt their bodies because the savages were known to rape and descrate the dead too.
It's an issue of bodily autonomy.
They knew the savages would not differentiate between young or old, dead or alove. Hence, agni kund. Brave women!
This is reality
👍🏽👍🏽
It's a step well most hunted place in India. The place were climax scene filmed.
This is reality of Islam
what is the reality of Islam? Islam is not this. Islam is about Peace and serving and surrending to Allah and not go and murder others or rape women. Research about Islam & then talk. Just bc one man or a couple did something atrocious doesn‘t mean Islam is at fault.
We r proud of our great History 🙏
So proud rani padmavat born in my country Lanka ❤
(23.07.21)Happy Birthday Surya(Actor Sivakumar Son)Greetings, Best Wishes
I dont think they show it in the movie, but in some parts ( im not sure if it was in rashput society, sorry not know how to write it).
Women could learn to figth, and they would be figthing with the men.
Also i think i read they realize jauhar with their weddings outfits, thats because all are wearing red.
Interesting! Thank you for letting us know 😊
its a real story , their ancestors still live in Udaipur
She existed who the heck told you 😅😅 so many kings have talked about her valour in their records 😑😑
As an Indian woman I feel more pained that these women felt they had no choice but to kill themselves because our traditions have ingrained in us that being raped makes us lesser than who we used to be and that we're too weak to fight against men. You could see they had a small army of women inside the fort but instead of picking up the trishuls and anything else that could've served as a weapon, they just gave up. This scene always gives me goosebumps and it takes exceptional courage to walk into a blazing fire but it still pains me to see so many women just give up and not die fighting.
You are absolutely right...
You'd rather be raped and enslaved till you die ?? Or convert to another religion? So weird
This is reality. No matter they'd have lost. It's better to die with dignity.
"Also the raped makes us lesser is such a weird lens of seeing this scene". You've no idea about the horrors of rape and enslavement. You're disgusting
@sittingduck I think it is just the different perspective of seeing the history or this particular event because you can't judge past incidents on the basis of today's morality it was not like they have not fought Rani Padmavati as well as the other woman fought in their own way....
And I don't think so in our history anywhere it is taught that women are weak because when it comes to Queen bravery then in Indian history there have also been queens like Rani Lakshmi Bai and many more Queen warriors who are not taught in our school textbooks that's why you don't know about them ...
@sittingduck and also there could be one more reason why they perform the Johar and not did one to one battle because the Mughals were also known for raping the dead bodies
So you want 10000 women to fight with an army of 60000 womenless men which has a history of rpes and even full of necrophiles
Can you do it today?
You shouldn't insult them by saying it was tragic. They were brave warriors even though they were women.😊
there is a place where jauhar was done and that fort is still hunted
Total there happen 3 johar , one padmavati, another karnavati and last maharana prataap wife too...... The first johar in India happen during Alexander invasion, 2nd during mohammad qasim and 3rd by padmavati queen... And one during the time of akbar too... And last johar was done due to aurangjeb.
This is not a film this is a true story of great hindu rajput rani padmini
Jai sanatan dharam
Jai bhawani
Proud to be Indian and Hindu 🕉️🕉️🕉️🙏🙏🙏
I really like ur intro music guys😝😝
Cinema chupista mama😁
Thank you 😄
Thanks dears for considering my request🙏 Love you ❤
Anytime 😊
Ranveer singh acting 👌
This is a real story.
In actual story, after jahur the remaining men would smear the ash on their bodies and go on a last stand off to kill as many invaders as possible. So as to weaken them for next Hindu kingdom that would face them.
It is said that the burning bodies could be smelled for miles letting the other kingdoms know of the sacrifice brave Rajputs women have made.
Red color is the symbol of sacrifice
Rani Padmavati🔥
Surprising fact.... Both the villain and the Deepika married in real life.
I find this debate of whether it really happened or not . Was it true ? very stupid. My student asked me if Ramayana really took place. How does it matter? The main thing is the lessons we learn from it. Rama, at a time when multiple marriages were common, especially for men, showed that having one wife is the ideal. Hey his own father had three wives. So let us not get into the rabbit hole of fact and fiction. Let us learn from all this and feel proud about our culture.
👍🏽👍🏽
That's what it is
Queen padmavati was died in the year 1303 and Alauddin khilji was died in the year 1316 So long ago 😱😱 OMG
Why they did jauhar nd not just killed themselves? Becoz these malekshas ( the M inva.. rs ) used to practice necrophilia. These brave women don't wanted even their dead bodies to be touched by them .
Jauhar happened atleast 3 times( as far as I remember) in Indian history .
Jauhar never happened when there was fight between hindu kings or with anyone except with M ... becoz hindus/ Rajputs never used to take other's women. This was kinda unwritten rule ( cultural effect) that nobody will touch / disrespect other's women.
But in case of M..... it was different becoz we all know what they used to do ....
Proud to be a rajput
Your research is wrong. Because of padmavati's juhar . Still now she is worshipped as goddess in rajasthan.
Rajput's juhar culture is real. Padmavati did juhar with all women to protect their dignity in reality. That is why Padmavati is goddess for Rajput.
Aahh we Kshatriyas R now waiting for Kalki
Dude it's real story
👍🏽👍🏽
Plase reaction top 10 most popoulr bgm in india
In this scene I don't really like how we never see what happens to the ladies who were throwing the coals, we don't know for sure if they somehow killed the guys with the fire attack & got away to join the others or were possibly massacred by the men if they made it through the fire
Only in your imagination, she didnt existed. Padmavati was a real character and story of alauddin trying to abduct her is real.
i think it is important to understand that a *LOT* of the history of the indian subcontinent has been destroyed by the invading forces. especially considering the inclusion of urdu in devnagri languages.
React shivaay song bolo har har. Lord shiva song
Sis, I am a rajput from bloodline of Maharana Pratap's vansh or you can say vansh so as pure Indian rajput I know that symbols exist because they existed in this untamed world and who the hell are these historians who told you or you have see their interview that they are myth. This is good of everyone in this world saying that hindu Gods and Goddesses are myth and now Indian history is also myth if it is then you all who think in this way are myth enough to leave this untamed world. Sis please tell me the link of those interviews or name of those fucking historians.
Didn’t mean any offence buddy, we must have had a bad source. Checkout our analysis of other scenes too 😊
@@sunilpia of course sis, but as an Indian I would suggest you to research properly before making videos especially on history and mythology of every country but for Indian history and mythology be careful. We are way too emotional for this.
BTW it's OK.
It was a real story.....and our rajput's pride and only this.....there are several story like this...so you are wrong.....it's a true story of our nation 💪💪💪
😭😭😭😭😭😭 Rajmata ko Naman
You guys should learn about India queen's and Women army defeting the British army and punishing them.
How disgusting ....
How can u deny our great History
It is not fake stories
It is our history
N we proud of it 🙏
Didn’t mean to offend. We must have referred to a bad source 😊
Stfu. It's fake. Don't force others to entertain your bulshit.
React to manikarnika climax scene
👍🏽👍🏽
wearing the pallu over head is part of rajput culture
👍🏽👍🏽
Indeed, when the Marathas-who were famous for violating and selling Rajput women-attacked and conquered the cities of Jaipur and Dhundhar, many Rajput women chose to end their lives by committing jauhar rather than submit to the outrages that were sure to be inflicted upon them by the Marathas.
Are you out of your mind what type of marathas are you talking about from where did you get your history knowledge ..... Even when the marathas won any war then they never made slaves the woman of the defeated one's ..... Get your history right WhatsApp University
Padmavati existed her real name was Padmini.
Miss Queen Padmavati really excited
You research is wrong
Please react on syeraa full title video song 👍
👍🏽👍🏽
Please watch Young Yama song from yamadonga movie
You should visit Chittorgarh Fort in Rajasthan. This is history not a made up story.
You are wrong...Queen Padmini belonged to the family of Maharana Pratap and the lake palace in Udaipur belongs to her descendants..You didnt do a proper research..if you had then you would have known that she is not a legend and which family she belonged to..her desdendants that is the royal family of Udaipur even confirmed her existence int their interviews on this movie..now obviously the family itself would certainly know about their anscestry..and Rani Padmini's jauhar is not the onky one..Thst family of Queen Padmavati has a histpry of Jauhar committed by the royal woman of their family..you need to research into that particular family Queen Padmavati was married into..you will be able to see their whole anscestry
Dude, you guys got the whole thing wrong. Please acknowledge this. You are saying things with so much confidence and it’s all wrong. Ashes with unmelted gems have been found all over India. This was happening around India in that time. It’s a huge part of the history.
You guys are yuck for not amending this or putting out a redacted comment.
Gross
Hi which country you are
We live in Australia 😊
On what basis are you saying that Rani Padmini does not exist at all?
And Allauddin Khilji existed. He started the Khilji dynasty in Indian history
Actually some historians think she existed...I would like you to comment your sources on this video...when u say historians those are English officers who used to rule India...they have made many claims that have been proven wrong in the long run...
It's real, it's Proud Indian History not a myth please get the facts straight
Please do Chandramukhi climex reaction ❣️
Soon 😊
Bro yuganiki okkaduu also
its a false information that she never existed , she existed for sure, these islamic muslim rulers destroyed majority of historic doucuments written about shit they did to women to small hindu empires ......but as its said history is not just written in documents............its a real story she existed for sure just go and see chittorgarh fort
True, we were mistaken 👍🏽