Aman's Fianchetto Speedrun Part 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- FOLLOW THE CHANNEL
▶ WATCH LIVE / chessbrah
▶ SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MAIN CHANNEL / chessbrah
▶ PLAY CHESS go.chess.com/c...
▶ / chessbrahtv
▶ / chessbrahtv
FOLLOW THE BRAHS:
/ amanhambleton
/ eric.hansen
/ hansenchess
/ amanhambleton
Check out our clothing store! ▶ chessbrahstore...
Our Music Producers ► MARTIN K4RMA and Jack Ryan (JR)
fanlink.to/MAR...
/ martink4rma
/ official.jr.music
spoti.fi/3zaJVMZ (Jack Ryan Spotify)
#amanhambleton #chessopening #fianchetto ▶ Play Chess go.chess.com/c...
▶ Join our Club chess.com/l/ch...
▶ WATCH LIVE / chessbrah
#chessbrah #amanhambleton #erichansen
I've watched 3 hours of this Fianchetto speedrun and Aman is now one of my favourite chess players/personalities now. I enjoy his screen presence. Easy and fun to listen to. Chill guy. Thanks for the Fianchetto lesson.
Sorry 4 hours watched of Aman's fianchetto run
46:15 "I might checkmate him by accident" i lol'd, love the powerhouse energy here 🤣
1:10:30 is definitely the funniest moment of this video
1:44:48 LMAO. Man, this speedrun is so much fun.
20:13 about a huge knight fork “we’re getting grandparents in here on this one”😆
Really enjoying how GM Hambleton explains the thought process along the way - both what he’s seeing and what the opponents (my level) are not seeing.
I don’t really like the bishop checkmate rule, though. I found myself forwarding through some of those “academic” endgames.
He does it for content, it's not like you have to follow it
Arbitrary rules like that really accentuate the spirit of chess in my opinion.
They force you to plan, strategize, and get creative, rather than memorize and recognize patterns. For example, watching Eric attempt the smother mate challenge was one of the most entertaining chess videos I’ve seen in a long time, but to each their own.
1:30:36 -- with the benefit of time and no pressure I found a (non-bishop) mate
Ne8+. Kg8 is forced because of double check. Qg7# with the knight now covering this square.
I’ve tried it at 600 Elo. Confirmed it works
33:38 is so savage in every way. Like he’s 20 moves ahead with bait
Been playing the 1 .. b6 incorrectly for ages .. this is huge!!
Can't wait for a new BUILDING HABITS episode guys
The previous episode was the last episode unfortunately.
it’s over
next up is BUILDING PLANS
Terrific fun *and* educational. Thanks!😁
Great fun to watch but Aman is scary good! Amazing.
36:50 very useful advice thanks aman :>
After watching Neiman, Magnus and Aman, I've discovered that the secret to really good chess is a really bad haircut. I have to find another barber and my elo should shoot right up.
43:56- 44:10 lmao what a double sac
31:38 lmao laughed so hard at this game.
I call this the "invisible bishop" open. Always put it back into the "hole of invisibility" Thank you; this is a ton of fun.
1:13:40 the thing is, there will be cheaters or other really high level plays that they will encounter. If they quit now, that means they were likely going to quit anyways. You're not going to be their only good opponent.
47:35 is so brutal man hahaha
This is absolutely top flight stuff, thank you sooooooo much :) You're my favourite player to watch on TH-cam :)
obviously watching all parts
OMG the game at 1:11:00 is hilarious. The guy is like ahh fuggit. Send it anyways. LOLOLOL
I'm new to chess. Can someone tell me why 13:17 (Nc6) is a good move? Shouldn't black just take the knight with the pawn? Why would that be a bad move? Any help is appreciated thank you.
people also forget that bishops can go backwards, had that a lot where they blundered straight another piece on the king side
Oponent: *makes random pawn moves*
Aman in 1:17:15 : 🎵What are those🎵
I learned something ! Thanks Aman !!! I’m a bully now lol
x doubt
Top 5 stone league right now all fianchetto haha
1:08:03 my bro chessbruh missed beautiful nxh3 gxh3 qh1# or nxh3 kh1 nxf2 kg1 qxg2# or m8 in 8 if rfxf2
so technically it's mate in 10 when the opponent played bh3
LETS FUCKING GOOOOO FIANCHETTOBRAHS WHERE YA AT
This has been a Great idea
ko potential is a new metric in chess
just finished watching 1st part. NNnnnnice
Those big bishops going in and out hard!
"You don't need two girls for one cup." I wonder how many people get that reference. (Don't google that if you're at work.)
Don't google that EVER is better advice.
U cant even google it its removed from google
I asked this in Part 1 video, but since this is more recent I may get a response... I like the look of this opening and would like to try it out, but I'm not sure how compatible it is with the "lessons" of the Building Habits series, which has taken me from 400 to 780 or so (so far). Would more experienced chess players (or Aman, maybe) recommend that I stick with the Building Habits approach, or can I try and combine this opening with those lessons?
You can play an opening and after that go back to following the habits.
I wouldn’t worry about the opening you’re playing too much, just play what openings you enjoy playing. I think the most important thing as you go through those rating ranges is just to improve your feel for the game tactically. As long as you’re not getting totally lost/really difficult to play positions out of the opening I think you can make any opening work. In my experience, when I play against the Owens defence I tend to get more closed positions, which I don’t think is great super helpful for getting position with more tactics. Closed positions aren’t in the spirit of habits series.
I personally would recommend playing something more traditional in the center as you learn. But of course, you can make it work. From the rating of around 700-1200 I played the London with white, and then I switch to e4 to just learn something different and experience some different positions. I think London was great for me at that level because it kind of reduces the amount of different openings I had to worry about. When I started playing E4 suddenly I needed to find a weapon against the Sicilian, the French, e4 e5 etc.
I’m not an expert by any means, just a 1600 rated hobbyist but they are my two cents. Best of luck!
@@aaaabb1666 I think your recommendation is good advice, I will stick to the very basic opening moves used in the Building Habits series... for now. Despite the fact that Aman started playing this fianchetto opening as a "level 400", I strongly suspect that he pulls it off entirely because his knowledge and understanding of the middlegame positions is faaaaar stronger than that of any actual 400-1400 range player. I really do believe that I would just be too lost and confused to really handle it. I will revisit the idea of trying this opening once I get to maybe 1100...
Stick to d4 or E4 openings
You learn the most from those IMO
Stick to the traditional stuff,
1B3
Or
B6 is for fun IMO
@@keithgoddard4192 I'd say both have their pros and cons for learning. 1.b3/...b6 is unusual, so not much theory, specially at lower elo. Also it allows you to use some tactical and positional themes like the long diagonal, how to make your bishop and your pawns work together, pressuring the center, pins. Some important habits from Aman's serie are not relevant with early fianchetto, such as "occupying the center with pawns".
Almost all IM and above chess teachers recommend starting out with 1.e4 and open positions because it allows most tactics and is more pedagogical. Cashing in easy wins because your opponents repeatedly forget your fianchettoed bishop sure is fun, but at the end of the day it is not very confrontational and you risk becoming a "one trick only" player which is not very good for progressing.
But still, I firmly believe any opening can be fun and a source of inspiration. If you want to have a clear cut path to get better at chess, go with Aman's 1.e4 repertoire of building habits, if you want hypermodern fun try out those fianchetto system. I firmly believe both can be really good for your chess and can provide a lot of fun. For example, I sometimes hear something along the lines of "the Gruenfeld shouldn't be played by players under 2300 elo, too much theory, too complicated to grasp etc". But at my level ( around 1400 fide ) I've always found the Gruenfeld indeed complicated but very rich with a very dynamic game which is a joy ( or a headache ) to play. You can also split between the two every few months to avoid routine. All the way to 2000 elo, getting better at tactics and getting the basics of endgames is much more important than focusing on opening theory.
I'm neither a master but that's my passionate third rate club player piece of advice.
The guy in the first game gave up a bishop for nothing lol
Well, good start and then bad habits kicks in... again. Thanks for the content.
LOL. Those four seconds from 1:38:10 - 1:38:14 need to be a giphy or something.
yessss ive been waiting for this
WHAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DEMANDING!
Is there gonna be building habits for 1900-2000 elo
Nope
The game at the 41:00 minute mark is pretty funny. LOL
I was laughing super hard at the "Yoink"😂
best series ever
1:07:20 Nh3)
i need the techno man :(
He makes it looks so easy 😅
Messi or neymar???
your mother
@@wasp7969 you're right, his mother is a football GOD!
U R fantastic
Is there any honor in smashing such lower rated players
It’s meant to teach the low rated viewers, not gain honor
yes
Imho (being a beginner myself) GM Hambleton is teaching me a methodical way of thinking in between all of the humor… for free!
I can look at it from the POV of learning how this opening works - the reasoning behind the pins, keeping the key diagonal open and the center closed, etc.
I can look at it from learning how the opponents aren’t seeing what’s going on, and gain understanding that generalizes to any opening.
That’s why videos like this are so valuable to me.
Alright fair enough guys. I use this technique too. And I'm just around 850 in bullet.