Dr. Scott Hahn | The Bible and the Sacrifice of the Mass | Franciscan University of Steubenville
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Dr. Scott Hahn, Professor of Theology at Franciscan University of Steubenville, speaks about "The Bible and the Sacrifice of the Mass" at the 2012 Defending the Faith Conference here on campus in Steubenville, Ohio. Dr. Scott Hahn is the Fr. Michael Scanlan, TOR, Chair of Biblical Theology and the New Evangelization at Franciscan University of Steubenville.
Watch the whole talk → • Dr. Scott Hahn: "The E...
LIKE the video and SUBSCRIBE to our channel for more videos!
weare.francisc...
FOLLOW Franciscan on social media!
Instagram → / franciscanuniversity
Facebook → / franciscanuniversity
Twitter → / franciscanu
LEARN more about Franciscan University at franciscan.edu.
From your talks about the Eucharist and Mary... and other topics... I understand one thing... Many of the misunderstandings of the Protestants and Evangelicals is... They look at it from a Modern Post Christian perspective... They never go back to the Old Testament references...
Roman Catholicism has resurrected the Levitical priesthood with sacrifices when Jesus by his work on the cross eliminated both as believers entered the New Covenant.
@@suzannemcmaken4648actually what the Catholic Church teaches is what the earliest Christian’s believed. If you study church history you will see this.
Protestantism is forced to relegate history to history. Christ and His sacrifice are well into the past. The early Church existed for the primary purpose of slowly writing and assembling the bible so that moderns could "divine" the truth from it. Our debt paid long ago, we have been cut loose to enjoy life with no fear or preoccupation with sin. And, from this comes the prosperity gospel and so many other errors.
@@HAL9000-su1mz
The early, authentic Church is not Catholicism, or Roman Catholicism.
The true Church founded on the prophets and apostles with Jesus Christ as the Chief Cornerstone brought the freeing message of liberty in Christ as believers were no longer under the law, or commandments.
The cross brought the free gift of forgiveness of sins.
Belief in Christ brought the free gift of salvation.
this why we need to evangelize more and more
Beautiful explanation of the Resurrection! Thank you.
The New Testament is a sacrament before it becomes a document-how beautiful! The New Testament is the Eucharist! It is the sacrifice of the Mass. We don’t need to prove where it says that in the New Testament. 24:09
Thank you very much Scott Hahn for deepening my faith in the Holy Eucharist.
@@epcd7021
You have faith in a water and flour wafer?!?
Really interesting
Dr. Hahn, when did Jesus say "It is finished"? During the Passover meal, or at the cross?
Dr. Hahn, u have absolutely no Scriptural basis for the idea that the Eucharist is what
transformed jesus' suffering from being an execution into a true and holy sacrifice.
Peter doesn't mention the Passover meal during his famous discurse in Acts 2
Thank you, Dr Hahn. This is what we Catholics should listen to, to broaden our faith in the Holy Eucharist. God bless you and the work that you do...Evangelizing.
@@jimtamanisokula1925
There is no mass or “holy eucharist” in scripture.
The Holy Ghost really flows through Scott Hahn here.
@@stefkadank-derpjr1453
Satan flows through Hahn with reducing the glorious, magnificent Christ the King to a wafer. The stupidity!
Hello, Dr. Hahn, i have to differ with you in the idea of the Passover meal being a sacrificial meal. I think it was just the opposite, it was a CELEBRATORY meal! Year after year, the Jews celebrated the end of the slavery period in Egypt.
The SACRIFICE had happened previously at the temple, when the family lamb had been slaughtered. The meal was NOT a sacrifice.
Also, you say that the crucifixion would not have been considered a sacrifice bc it didnt happen at the temple. Well, neither the passiver meal, which happened at a home!
I also think you are completely forgetting Acts 2, when Peter explained his JEW listeners that the execution of Jesus had been in their behalf.
You also mention the sacrifice of the Mass, but are you forgetting the book of Hebrews, where we read several times that Jesus was offered "once and for all"? (Hebrews 10, 12, f.e)
U also say that the Eucharist is what transformed the cross from execution to sacrifice. Well, Peter didn't mention any of that in Acts 2. Peter didn't have one word about the last supper, which his listeners didn't even know about.
The totality of, or most of the NT books were probably written before 70 aD, since such an important event as the destruction of the temple is notbmentioned in any of the books.
Also, Jesus had already offered ORALLY the bulk of the NT.
@@carolinajackson7621
Hahn doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
You are correct. There was no sacrifice at the Last Super, which was really the Jewish Passover meal.
Jesus simply told the apostles to take bread and wine and remember HIM and His sacrifice. “DO THIS IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME.”
The eucharist and mass are lies out of the pit of hell.
The old testament passover sacrifice of a lamb was also the meal. You had to eat the lamb after it was sacrificed. So in the NT passover, we need a way to eat the lamb.
Jesus does this thru the Last Supper when he holds bread and wine saying this IS my body which is poured out for the remission of sins. He gives us the Eucharist to be truly himself
Paul is not talking about Passover or the Lord's Supper in 1 Cor. 5. He's talking about fornication (sexual immorality) in the church.
1 Cor. 5:6-9 - Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: 8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: He's not talking about Passover but he's using it to illustrate a point. His point has nothing to do with Passover or with the Lord's Supper. He's talking about booting that fornicator out of the church to make the lump (the church) unleavened.
What if he said this? Fornication is a bacterial infection (yeast is bacteria). Let's keep the whole lump bacteria free because Jesus is clean and bacteria free!
Would anyone mistake that for the Lord's Supper? No. He's talking about a form of medicine that didn't come until centuries later. They didn't know about bacterial infections back then but they understood that yeast is an impurity. "Beware the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees", Jesus warned.
So, the guy is grasping at straws. This guy is a deceiver like all Jesuits.
A covenant is a contract. God's covenant was in place at the resurrection of Jesus. You're playing with words by limiting the New Testament to a document.
"Do this in memory of me" is referring to the Lord's Supper, which the disciples of Christ continue to do (unaided by a magic clergyman). It's not referring to "doing the New Testament", whatever that's supposed to mean.
Reading and understanding the Book of Hebrews shows where this deceiver is going off the rails. He gets away with it because nobody reads it and those who do, by-and-large, don't understand it.
Catholics are distinct from Christians, aren't they? I mean, if you depart from the doctrine of Christ, can you still qualify as a real Christian?
2 John 9 - Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God.
The Apostle John says, "No. a Catholic is not a Christian."
Okay, the speaker understands Passover. Nobody ever said that the Passover was anything other than what he said in his speech. But then he conflates it with a sacrifice, which is a connection that no writer of any of the books of the bible makes. In other words, he's performing a magic trick.
Is the Lord's Supper a sacrifice? Show me in scripture where it says that and I'll believe it. But nothing in this or any other document I've read or heard has ever shown that connection. In other words, you have to read that into the word of God.
That's called eisegesis, which is a fake way to interpret any contract.
Amen 🙏
Does anyone know where to find a similar video that includes the story of Dr Hahn’s journey of study of the book of Revelation (and conversion). It might be the next part of this talk but it ends abruptly. Thanks for any leads!
Not sure if this is what you were looking for but here’s the original conversion story “the conversion tape”. It doesn’t have video but it’s the recording of his talk on his conversion.
m.th-cam.com/video/P-bz4kRtCQI/w-d-xo.html
Look up “Scott Hahn: what made him a Catholic (conversion story)” also has a great podcast on “pints with aquinas”
Gorgeous speaker. You Scott is the modern apostle.
Amazing
Dont give up on the faith
If we were living at Calvary, we would be experiencing an execution.
But, if we understand God, He doesn't see time as linear like we do. He see all time as ONE TIME. So, the Catholic Church, in a way, understanding Him, celebrates the Mass, which is the re-enactment of Calvary, as God sees Calvary as happening NOW.
God is the ETERNAL NOW
@@3685killer
Father God doesn’t see Calvary. It’s over. “IT IS FINISHED.”
“For by ONE sacrifice He has made PERFECT forever those who are being sanctified.” HEBREWS 10:14.
Calvary gave the believer the forgiveness of all his/her sins, past present and future.
Belief in Jesus Christ gave us salvation. No false 7 sacraments needed.