To support this work, please consider providing a one-time tip through the "Super ThankYou" option above. You can also be an ongoing supporter as a Patreon member where you can obtain transcripts and unedited materials.
Thank you for the care you put into these videos. It's a pleasure to learn these texts alongside you. I always look forward to your videos, and I learn even more from rewatching them
Thank you for this lesson. Is the noesis and noema in someway related to Husserl's Parts and Wholes? Maybe the noesis and noema are moments of the transcendental Ego.
Hi Bruce. My inclination is that Parts and Wholes are concerned with the noematic side of the correlation because they deal with matters of relation concerning the intended object rather than the mental acts directed toward it (noesis). And yes, I do believe that the noesis and noema are moments of the transcendental ego, which I think is why Husserl (as opposed to Descartes) defines the ego as a cogito directed toward a cogitatum rather than merely a cogito.
@@SingularityasSublimity Yes, This Makes a Great deal of Sense to me, if I think back to Heidegger‘s discussion of the how of the noema in the History of the Concept Time. So the how of the object or noema is experienced as adumbrated and a whole together. Or I Could be missing the Point Again. I thank you very much For Your Response.
@@brucecmoore2881 I think there is a difference between this notion of whole--Parts and the act of synthesis whereby an object is constituted as a whole. The Whole-Parts, I believe, concerns a descriptive analysis of already constituted objects in terms of their logical/formal relations with one another and how those relations give rise to higher order objects, etc. So I think the act of passive synthesis is a precondition of conducting a Whole-Part analysis which concerns the noematic side of intentionality. Not sure if that makes sense, feel free to add any follow up questions!
To support this work, please consider providing a one-time tip through the "Super ThankYou" option above. You can also be an ongoing supporter as a Patreon member where you can obtain transcripts and unedited materials.
Really good material!!! 👍
Thank you for the care you put into these videos. It's a pleasure to learn these texts alongside you. I always look forward to your videos, and I learn even more from rewatching them
Thank you. That is wonderful to hear!
Thank you so much for these! these concepts are very difficult for me and this has helped me comprehend the text that much more
thank u so much , as a philosophy student i am studying phenomenology and husserl is hard to understand , but your video is giving me a relief
Thanks!
Thank you for doing this
Takk!
værsågod. Og takk for støtten!
(I hope that is stated correctly)
Thank you for this lesson. Is the noesis and noema in someway related to Husserl's Parts and Wholes? Maybe the noesis and noema are moments of the transcendental Ego.
Hi Bruce. My inclination is that Parts and Wholes are concerned with the noematic side of the correlation because they deal with matters of relation concerning the intended object rather than the mental acts directed toward it (noesis). And yes, I do believe that the noesis and noema are moments of the transcendental ego, which I think is why Husserl (as opposed to Descartes) defines the ego as a cogito directed toward a cogitatum rather than merely a cogito.
@@SingularityasSublimity Yes, This Makes a Great deal of Sense to me, if I think back to Heidegger‘s discussion of the how of the noema in the History of the Concept Time. So the how of the object or noema is experienced as adumbrated and a whole together. Or I Could be missing the Point Again. I thank you very much For Your Response.
@@brucecmoore2881 I think there is a difference between this notion of whole--Parts and the act of synthesis whereby an object is constituted as a whole. The Whole-Parts, I believe, concerns a descriptive analysis of already constituted objects in terms of their logical/formal relations with one another and how those relations give rise to higher order objects, etc. So I think the act of passive synthesis is a precondition of conducting a Whole-Part analysis which concerns the noematic side of intentionality. Not sure if that makes sense, feel free to add any follow up questions!
@@SingularityasSublimity I thank you for this great answere
Thanks!