The Ethics of Utilitarianism. Christians REACT to Absurd Trolley Problems

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2023
  • Christians react to absurd trolley problems. Glen Scrivener is joined by Speak Life Year Out student Joe Levy to explore utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics in the context of absurd moral dilemmas presented by the trolley problem.
    Try the absurd trolley problems game: neal.fun/absurd-trolley-probl...
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @speaklifemedia
    LINKS//
    Subscribe to this channel for videos that see all of life with Jesus at the centre:
    th-cam.com/users/SpeakLifeMedi...
    Subscribe to our other TH-cam channel, Reformed Mythologist, to explore how the stories we love point to the greatest story of all:
    www.youtube.com/@ReformedMyth...
    The Speak Life Podcast is available wherever you get your podcasts:
    iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/6RTY21m...
    Amazon: music.amazon.com/podcasts/e03...
    Speak Life is a UK based charity that resources the church to reach the world.
    Learn more about us here: speaklife.org.uk/
    CONNECT//
    Are you a creative Christian? Would you like to join us for a day, a week or 10 months? Find out more here:
    speaklife.org.uk/foundry
    Discord is an online platform where you can interact with the Speak Life team and other Speak Life supporters. There’s bonus content and creative/theological discussion. You can join our Discord here:
    speaklife.org.uk/give/
    Social Media:
    speakLifeuk/
    speaklifeuk/
    speaklifeuk
    tiktok.com/@speaklifeuk

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @GnomeFan21
    @GnomeFan21 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    glen, please bring back joe, he is so funny, ahhaaha

  • @mcmilge
    @mcmilge 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great fun😂 (for more exploration see the Good Place!

  • @stjudeschurchmapperley1167
    @stjudeschurchmapperley1167 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved that - so fascinating! Did you notice that on level 10 (where you could speed up the trolley) the title of the level was "mercy"? Implying that it would be an act of mercy to kill the people more quickly. Maybe that's part of the reason so many people said they'd pull the lever in that case.

  • @LeoChaseTheMythMaster
    @LeoChaseTheMythMaster 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love this kind of video and the channel in general. (And I would never choose lobsters lives over a cat's life.)

  • @peterthomas6151
    @peterthomas6151 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was both hilarious and insightful. Fantastic idea

  • @JenE3377
    @JenE3377 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So many cats so few recipes whereas lobsters.....it's a no brainer.

  • @thefioretta100
    @thefioretta100 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting!

  • @user-tc8yj7zd7k
    @user-tc8yj7zd7k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In the first one, I divert the trolley and splat the one. I think not doing something can also be a conscious choice (not washing bacteria off your hands before cooking for friends and giving them food poisoning is a conscious choice not to do something). Sometimes not (so in the case of end of life care I would say withdrawing treatment and actively injecting poison are different things). I totally get the point though and don't disagree with your choice to stay on the path though.
    However if it was my child on one track, and thousands of people on the other, I'd choose my child. Not even a question. And that puts God's love for me in context, that he was willing to send his son to die for me.

    • @user-tc8yj7zd7k
      @user-tc8yj7zd7k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Choose my child to live, for clarity!

  • @Ryan_possibly
    @Ryan_possibly 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember the Bible also saying something about a season to kill

  • @enkhyy
    @enkhyy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    stop or derail the trolley. Do what you know is right. Doing nothing is not an alternative.

    • @justaguy328
      @justaguy328 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cowards way out of the problem

  • @GnomeFan21
    @GnomeFan21 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Haha

  • @GnomeFan21
    @GnomeFan21 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Get joe back on

  • @Ryan_possibly
    @Ryan_possibly 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a right answer to the first problem, pull the lever

  • @lage3127
    @lage3127 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You first argue that pulling the lever would be actively killing someone, not pulling the lever won't be - later on in the money example you say "40% would kill 5 people for their life savings" - wait a minute! Why NOW it's killing people instead of just "letting it happen and pray"? You probably should check a little bit on consistency xD
    Great video idea nonetheless, enjoyed watching it!

    • @jpstahl2939
      @jpstahl2939 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the first scenario it is letting 5 people die or killing 1 person to save 5. In the other scenario it is letting 5 people die or lose all your money. The hierarchy of their values are: Do not kill and help who you can help even at the cost of your own life. They seemed pretty consistent in their choices.

    • @Arvak777
      @Arvak777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People aren't products or things. You can choose how to treat your things. But when it comes to people that's not up to you.