A clip from the series 'The Elegent Universe' regarding some aspects of General Relativity and gravity. More info- archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduc...
@orderedntropy so by changing is frequency like in the redshift of hubble, light don´t change momentum? or the compton effect also dosen´t change ligth momentum. light changes momentum by changing frequency ,not speed.
This exactly the kind of garbaldy-gook speak that turns people off of science and hating lawyers. I’ll just leave it at that. I won’t waste my time with anything further, because people like this are unlikely to understand.
Question: If Earth has curved space and space is pushing us towards earth, then how do density contrast in earth have stronger gravitational fields? I have a hard time understanding how space-time would respond to density contrast as we observe gravity doing so in Gravity exploration/measurements around the earth. Please explain if you understand this, thanks
i have a lot of questions...all the sun is is a huge chunk of fire and burn...it has no gravitational pull does it? and whats with there all the sudden being gravity and force in space? Sorry if these r out of line im ignorant.
who exactly is the geometry of this space-time fabric, because with those animation from the video it seems like there is an up and down, and therefor all gravity orbits, orbit in the same direction.... hope you understand what i mean, im norwegian :)
Thanks, the free-falling example helped me imagine the graph! But how does this translate into the orbits of celestial bodies? Since the speed of Earth orbiting the Sun is constant, where is the curved space trajectory there?
Re: "Exact Wall Soln."/ For example, null `z`-geodesics (ie, x=const.,y=const.) are geodesics on which the element of length is given by: ds2=c2(A)dt2 - (A)^(2n2/1-n)dz2. With A := 1 + a|z|/c2 => dz/dt=c2(A)^B. With B := (2n2 + n -1)/(n-1). Where we MUST have A>0. Note that the light ray undergoes a sharp turn at the `corner` located at z=0. What physical phenomenon would you attribute this effect to ??
thanks but i still have one question. If there is gravitational force between the sun and the earth becuz of the difference in their mass how come humans are not pulled to big buildings by gravity? Or other small objects?
mathematics or physics I want to jump in, is there not a limit to "physics" when it comes to math? For example is there physically an infinite space between two whole numbers? Or is the universe capable of reflecting a googelplex in real terms? You can fit the world into numbers, but can you fit the numbers into the real world? where not there to many mathematical possibilities in String Theory, to know which one my reflect the laws of the universe? Is the universe open or closed?
i have two questions that i hope someone can explain without sarcasm. i am just trying to learn. the first is'what keeps the earth from spiralling closer and closer to the sun and in time be merged with it as it goes round and round?',the second question is whether the space time fabric as diagrammed functioning like a flat surface. thanks.
This is a very clear presentation of the theory of gravity, but I wonder how many see this and think that the flat representation of space is a concrete model of space. I think it can mislead people who don't understand that this flat representation is only one of an infinite number stacked together to form three dimensional space, and that each flat layer is warped by gravity. I know it complicates the image and the motion of the planet through the flat layers, but it would be a more accurate image.
its up to people's capacity of imagination relative to their memory bank. if they can see a full model of this without the help or use of visual aids, then it wouldnt be misleading at all.
+SMgirlsarah I agree. I understand it more better now. But I cannot imagine in which dimension will mass push the space time curvature. I guess this a complete abstract idea and beyond human senses...
Just because you seem to know what you are talking about, I wanted to ask: If gravity is just the curvature of space time, then why should the speed of incoming objects matter in terms of them getting caught in the gravitational well of a nearby planet? I see it kind of like a train track - space bends along many tracks depending on one's distance from the gravitational well. Does the speed of incoming objects affect space-time too? If its too complicated its ok..maybe i should go to university
@jqs1943 I'm not referencing to your outlook on the superstring frequencies of matter, I'm simply stating that the logic in saying "if light and heat came from the sun, would it not be logical to assume that space would be lit up and extremely hot?" is wrong.
It's worth noting that the equation for angular momentum is J=vmr where J is angular momentum, v is tangential velocity, m is mass and r is radius. In the case of an orbiting object, the equation can be arranged as v=J/mr where J and m are constants and v and r are variables. If you calculate J for Earth orbiting the Sun using the semi-major axis then punch in the aphelion and perihelion apsis, you'll see how v (tangential velocity) changes and the effects on centripetal acceleration.
The ultimate unification and understanding of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY manifest as F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Here's the proof. This also explains why objects (including WHAT IS THE FALLING MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS clearly and necessarily F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. ON THE CLEAR, EXTENSIVE, SENSIBLE, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND UNIVERSAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly PROVEN TO BE F=MA ON BALANCE: Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. I have explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! By Frank DiMeglio
While gravity is considered the bending of spacetime in General Relativity, a quantum theory of gravity is still in the works (the graviton being a candidate along with Loop Quantum Gravity and string theory). For more info I recommend visiting 'physics forums' and typing graviton in search.
WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY F=MA (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity AS SPACE ON BALANCE: TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Hence, the Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. (The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE.) A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=mC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Again, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. By Frank DiMeglio
Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio
ok i really have a weird question here what are the dimension of spacetime? and here they are talking about two dimension of space and a single dimension of time what is that actually means ? and i've heard so many people talks about 5th dimensions etc..what are the dimension of spacetime i really need an explanation !
Though the electron is a lot smaller than the proton, the principle remains the same- You might want to check out the CERN videos regarding the LEP (Large Electron Positron collider) 'LEP Stars Underground' which looks at how speeds close to that of light are achieved in accelerators.
if General Theory of Relativity explains the Orbits of Planets around heavy objects , how Polar Satelites are orbiting around Earth ? if we Picture up a Fabric of spaceTime as a Flat then how would we explain orbit of Polar satelites ? . i am Confused a lot
what stops the earth moving in beside the sun..if u put a ball(sun) in the middle of a trampoline and put a smaller ball(earth) on the trampoline the smaller ball will move into the centre beside the bigger ball...but if you throw the smaller ball in a straight line the smaller ball follows the curves and move around in a circle around the larger ball(orbit)...how did the earth get in a position that it is in orbit rather than being pulled in beside the sun due to the curves in the space fabric?
Here are my thoughts. How can you say that there is a fabric bent around an object influencing gravity on at, while also stating if that object were to go away it would then send a ripple that we would feel act on our planet when after our planet leaves in whatever direction it will be traveling through this fabric which also too is warping around earth but offers no resistance to act against us now to stop us. We keep going that way forever then right? So how is it this ripple of the fabric can affect us but not to slow us down as we travel whilst bending through it also? This fabric effects force on us or doesn't? If it does then why would earth keep going into space at a steady speed without any type of friction from this force that has friction when It feels like it?
@ScienceIsKnowledge There isn't enough room here to explain it fully, but an alternative to spacetime curvature is electromagnetic polarization. Oppositely charged subatomic particles are pushed and pulled by gravity fields, so that while some particles are pushed into a weaker part of the field, others are pulled into a stronger part of the field. This accounts for both the attractive nature and the extreme weakness of gravity.
I have a question . since not all object that has mass cause a curvature in spacetime but just the objects with a gravitational field ,how does smaller object's gravity cause any effect and in what form do they exist ? Or are they ignored because the forces are so tiny ?
***** actually I didn't know that . we didn't learn anything like that in school all I know about relativity came from other places and thank you for pointing out that to me :))
@@viadeng WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY: Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!! The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio
WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY: Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!! The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio
@LeconsdAnalyse aha, it still puzzles me. Something must keep them from crashing into each other even if they don't form a singularity. More strange are comet's orbits.
ON THE ESSENTIAL AND NECESSARY RELATION OF E=MC2 AS F=MA (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is clearly gravity AS WHAT IS NECESSARILY POSSIBLE/POTENTIAL AND ACTUAL IN BALANCE: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. ACCORDINGLY, the Moon AND THE PLANETS move AWAY very, very, very slightly in comparison to WHAT IS THE SUN !! SO, carefully consider what is THE EYE !! Finally, think about what is the speed of light (c). E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Magnificent. It ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense ON BALANCE !!! This does explain the fourth dimension, including the term c4 therewith !!! "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. So, notice that what is THE MOON is basically dead or inert ON BALANCE !!! GREAT. INDEED, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!! The sky is BLUE, AND what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !! (Notice what is THE EYE !!) ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE, AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! Great. Carefully consider what is the Sun. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Consider what is BALANCED observer dependent/related experience ! Carefully consider the man (INCLUDING what is THE EYE) who actually IS in outer "space". NOW, think about TIME; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. INSTANTANEITY is therefore FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. So, here we have established what can basically and sensibly be understood as constituting a one dimensional relation. A white dwarf star is about the size of the Earth, AND it is ALSO (ON BALANCE) the PROJECTED form or fate (IN TIME) of the Sun !!! Great !!! Stellar clustering ALSO proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Against what is outer "space", why would the Sun maintain what is its "preferential" existence ? The answer is THE EYE/the observer. INDEED, notice that THE EYE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ! Now, ON BALANCE, consider what is the speed of light (c). A galaxy is basically FLAT. SO, think about a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) as well. HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma !! Carefully consider what is THE EYE !! TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM energy. Excellent !!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand !!! GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider WHAT IS THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about TIME !!! NOW, the stars AND PLANETS do REMAIN AS what are POINTS in the night sky. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. This explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The fact that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution is not a meaningless coincidence, AS the fact that both the Sun AND the Moon are the SAME SIZE in the sky is not some sort of a meaningless coincidence. Notice the match with the size of what is THE EYE. Magnificent !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Carefully consider what are the POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!! Think about the necessity (or essential nature) of TIME, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma ON BALANCE !!! Great. It is proven. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 IS F=ma.) Consider what is THE SUN AND what is THE EARTH/ground in DIRECT comparison, AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! GREAT !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
ok regarding what you said about quantum mechanic and general relativity this is not the issue because if we wanna discuss that it would take days , my main question was the univese itself composed of matter so the universe contain mass , why is the the acceleration of the universe is faster than light speed although the special relativity says NO OBJECT WITH MASS CAN ACCELERATE TO THE SPEED OF LIGHT ?
So earth moves due to this curvature in the spacial fabric .How does it explain the earth attract all objects towards it as if there was a force acting from the centre pulling everything towards(radially)My doubt here is that if earth has its own curvature in the spacial fabric and if indeed all objects simply follow the curvature then why does the all objects appear to fall towards its centre.
If you have 2 torches a kilometre apart shining their beams towards each other and someone travels back and forth between those torches at one third the speed of light, how can it be explained that the light from both torches is travelling at the speed of light relative to the person travelling back and forth between the torches?
@VarvaraBell Are you talking about amplifying lasers around the solar system's asteroid belt? Also, apparently gravity waves are still swirling around space-time since the beginning of the universe, and are thought to be exploitable for big bang research. Apparently a satellite is being put up for that purpose.
@DeviousBetrayer i believe that space exists only when someone occupies that area of space/time.therefore space as we know has a finite size yet could expand to an indefinite size. and the universe as we know it has a minimum size of 190(ish with uncertainty) light years.
Hint: Investigate the physical significance of Einstein`s field equation, G=8(pi)T , here in units s.t. "G"=c=1. Where "G" is the gravitational constant, not to be confused with the tensor G. And, divT=0.
I'm still not quite sure I understand what you're saying, so let me know if this doesn't explain anything. An observer always observes his own time to pass at the same rate (everything always seems normal to him.) Now, if you have observer 1 watch observer 2 go by at a high speed, obs1 will see obs2's clock moving more slowly; and the difference depends on what velocity obs1 sees obs2 going at. Perhaps you can explain where a "progression effect" would come into this? There is none.
Basically the Earth's centripetal acceleration (a=v^2/r) approx. equals the gravitational pull of the Sun at Earth's orbit (a=Gm/r^2), conservation of angular momentum (J=vmr) keeps Earth in orbit around the Sun (I've put this in more detail elsewhere in the comments).
Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio
@mucalinda there were already several hints and evidence of it, there was the Michelson Morley Ether experiment and the Maxwell equations for electromagnetism that predicted that an electromagnetic field would travel at a constant speed in space (I think it was calculated closed to the speed of light or it is the same I don´t remember right now).The genius of Einstein was recognizing that Ether was not necessary if the speed of light was the limit, & light was actually an electromagnetic field
a question. why isnt earth moving closer to the sun? its gravity is keeping us from floating out into space but why do we stay in the same spot. shouldnt we be slowly drifting closer to the sun.
@VarvaraBell Think of it like the ball in roulette, as long as it keeps a high enough speed, it will stay in "orbit", it only rolls in when friction makes its speed too slow. Earth is not subject to friction, and its orbit is (at least fairly) stable.
As the Earth moves away from the Sun, its tangential velocity begins to drop (due to conservation of angular momentum) which means it's centripetal acceleration drops also and it's now overcome by the Suns gravity and begins to fall back towards the Sun where the process begins again, hence a relatively stable, very slightly elliptical, orbit. I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your second question but I would suggest you take a look at Schwarzschild metric.
THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: The BALANCE of being AND experience is essential. Consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. (SO, think about what is THE EYE.) The orange Sun is lava ON BALANCE !! THINK. Think about what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Think about TIME. NOW, think about the man who IS in what is outer "space". (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Think about what is THE SUN. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Carefully consider what now follows, as E=MC2 is CLEARLY and NECESSARILY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are THE EARTH/ground AND THE SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! Great !!! NOW, think about WHAT IS THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; as E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, objects (AND WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); as E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE !!!!! It also makes perfect sense that the PLANETS move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) Great. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!!!! Carefully consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Magnificent !!! E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE !!! By Frank DiMeglio
Generally relativity is political in accordance with maximum money making agenda “physics”. Galaxies disprove Einstein. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Here is the proof. WHY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEPARATE inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, gravity, AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=MA IN BALANCE: Gravity is not fully and accurately described or accounted for by the idea of “curved” “space”. Consider the man who IS actually in what is outer “space”. Think about TIME. Consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) what is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, as E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. Think about TIME. Consider what is the speed of light (c). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=MA ON BALANCE: The balance of being and experience is essential. THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. GREAT !!! Think. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as E=mc2 is F=ma. Accordingly, the rotation of what is the Moon matches it's revolution. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as E=mc2 is F=ma ON BALANCE. Carefully consider what is the speed of light (c). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the PLANETS will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun. THE EARTH/ground AND what is the Sun are CLEARLY linked AND BALANCED opposites, as E=mc2 is F=ma !!! “Mass”/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE EARTH is blue, AND the sky is ALSO BLUE ON BALANCE. Gravity is CLEARLY proven to be ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy on balance. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 is F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as E=mc2 is F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AND BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio
If objects within our universe bends the space fabric in our universe to create gravity, then objects travelling outside our universe towards our objects would be repelled, like anti-gravity. Is that correct?
one question: why doesn't the earth's orbit around the sun change because of it's gravity. If you don't have enough speed to escape it's gravity, my logic says that you eventually will be pulled in, and not maintain a certain orbit around it ?
they put the graphical model of the time-space for better understanding. but the 4D looks like a plain 2d, how do I better understand how massive objects curve the space???
I believe gravitational force is another kind of energy that we can't detect directly yet, we can only feel its presence. It is a kind of energy generated weakly from each atom, able to weakly grasp hold of other atom(s), that is why why more atoms are together, the piled up gravity is much higher.
I'm probably understanding this wrong.....Can someone please explain why does the Earth not fall into (or towards) the Sun in this spacetime curvature (esp. if the mass of the Sun is more at creating a 'deeper' curvature)? I'm missing a piece to this puzzle!?!?!
@rhcp4565 According to the theory, the reason orbiting bodies don't get sucked down the gravitational drain is because there is no friction in space. The centrifugal force of circular motion balances the gravitational force of attraction, and without any friction, this goes on essentially forever.
12 ปีที่แล้ว
So .. space-time is stretchable. And, if cause of deformation disappears, it reverts to the original state , them .. wouldn't it make the warping of space-time act like "Ideal Spring" ?
@jqs1943 I'm only 13 and don't completely understand most of the concepts behind advanced physics, I am simply stating what I think is wrong. If I've got my knowledge right, a photon is the virtual particle that is part of the wave-particle duality of light. Also, all objects reflect a certain degree of light, but they also absorb a large quantity. Because light travels so fast, it is absorbed and reflected so fast that we can not visibly trap it. The frequency reflected defines the colour.
Mr. Paresh Dave has given the following writing the thumbs up. Great. WHY EINSTEIN'S EQUATIONS PREDICT THAT SPACE IS EXPANDING OR CONTRACTING IN AND WITH TIME: Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. ACCORDINGLY, the known mathematical unification of Einstein's equations AND Maxwell's equations (given the addition of A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION) is proven and explained. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. (Notice the term c4 from Einstein's equations.) It is CLEARLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This is the ultimate unification of physics/physical experience. It ALL makes perfect sense. I have truly unified physics. Consider THE MAN who IS standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. (Notice that THE DOME of a person's eye is ALSO VISIBLE.) OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND DESCRIPTION) is improved in the truly superior mind. Indeed, the ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. It is ALL CLEARLY proven. In fact, I have also clarified, clearly identified, and corrected the limited notion of curved "SPACE". MY UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS SURPASSES ALL OTHERS. E=mc2 IS F=ma. A galaxy is basically FLAT. Think !!! GREAT. Notice the black space of what is THE EYE as well. It ALL makes perfect sense. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The Sun AND the Earth are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! LOOK at what is the BLUE SKY. The EARTH is ALSO blue. NOW, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Beautiful !!! Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of what is THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. It is fully, CLEARLY, and consistently proven. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. By Frank DiMeglio
@lukequixotesanjose i think is the same as saying that potential energy as a equivalence with cinetic energy but we both know that in nature they are very diferente.
@8:14...Shows the most accurate picture of space-time that i`ve seen (in these clips) thus far! Note, however, that each 2D plane depicted is really a 3D space.
@jqs1943 I understand somewhat what you are talking about. I'd love you to publish a book of this theory of Sunotics that explains things in laymans terms, and if you can't do that, then link me to some articles or books I could read. Thanks.
i've heard this from one of the american topest physicist and i can send the video to your email if you want about how much energy would it take an atom to accelerate to light speed , my other question is how can they make the subatomic particle accelerate to light speed although they are massive!
@am101171 ah! and there were also the Lorentz equations that are exactly the same Einstein used for the special theory of relativity, Einstein just put all these together, which might seem little when looked from outside, but it was a big leap that nobody did in 300 years. And this is only for the special theory of relativity.
so in the same principle that you mentioned about matter inside the universe so basically the universe is a vast amount of matter or "energy" but that matter has been accelerating since the big bang . i think this question rises consern to me along with the contradiction between quantum mechanic and general relativity
@b0gdanB Think of a marble rolling around a funnel. Sure, it will eventually fall into the center, but only because friction between the surfaces took away the energy. If it weren't for that, it would roll around the funnel forever.
@lukequixotesanjose everyting u say is correct, is the actual understanding, or best possible that we have today, as newton and galileo here on the past. of course theres a relation of energy and mass, thats wy the universe works all togheter but saying that things are the same is to much. we need to know the diferences. the fabric of space time is an abstraction, something is happening but assuming a diferente "eter" and some excelente matematics is not anouf.sorry my spelling.
So our solar system is basically a bunch of balls on a flat trampoline type fabric? Every diagram or model I see of this looks like things would always fall in to the heavy middle object (assuming it didn't initially have the speed to quickly leave the warped fabric)
@mooseythejuiceman of course but i would not really call it " gravity waves " i will simply call that waves emitted by the destruction of the sun if it happens cause it has to do with the space time sorry for the english I'm french :)
That surely was helpfull...bt i think the video is too short to explain thr general relativity.... because i understood this video but i want to understand that which only einstein, eddington and chandrashekhar understood....can i get any help plz....???
Well... atoms still move at 0 Kelvin due to the uncertainty principle thought. but without pressure, can, say... 4 atoms in a large space become "solid" if they aren't connected to each other?
@jqs1943 No, because heat diminishes very quickly over the space of a vacumn, because there is very little to carry it. Light simply doesn't react very much to this because it has independent particles, and it's speed never changes. The only reason it may flicker is because it is interferred by air in the last milliseconds from the beginning of our atmosphere into our retinas.The little heat that makes it to earth is majority transferred by IR and UV rays, which are a components of light.
According to the current model of gravity, Einstein's general theory of relativity, gravity is in fact the distortion of space-time (space-time being the mathematical model that unifies the 3 dimensions of space with the one dimension of time). This theory is heavily supported by numerous lines of evidence, including observations of gravitational lensing, gravitational time dilation, gravitational waves, and the perihelion precession of Mercury.
@VarvaraBell In addition, we had initial momentum, and were flung into the Sun's gravity. it's like rolling in a curve around the gravity of the Sun. While we are not subject to friction, we are subject to other sources of gravity and are so losing spin and momentum. Gravity does never completely diminish, as the strength of gravity is the square of it's distance, and so can not be completely eliminated.
What do you mean by "time is linear?" Time isn't absolute, but does share a relationship with space. In standard geometry the spatial distance between two points was invariant. r²=x²+y²+z². In relativity, this is not the case. With special relativity, a new invariant is defined: s²=t²-r² One way to look at this is that all observers travel at a constant speed through space-time, such that the faster you travel through space, the slower you travel through time. continued...
Forgive me, I was not saying you didn't understand, only that it has been difficult for me to understand what you're trying to say. I do believe I understand you now (correct me if I'm wrong). If you have two clocks (initially synchronized) running at different rates, then over a long period of time the difference of time measured on the clocks will become very great. This is correct, and is not a problem for relativity; it is at the heart of time dilation and relativity embraces it.
That`s correct. But the speed of light (in vacuum) is an issue that has been decided in special relativity, this clip is about general relativity. Also, don`t forget about the other three spatial variables.
Even in the "empty" space between Galaxies there is some matter. Maybe only an atom for every 100 cc's of the empty vacuum, but if you measure the vast area of the "emptiness" of inter-galactic space these scattered atoms actually may have more volume (scattered mass?) than MANY Galaxies. I guess it matters how we define the "empty vacuum" of space...
"10^-26 what meters?" I mean a relative fraction. So the distortion on one meter would be 10^-26 meters. And for the wavelengths of the stars (let's say 500 nanometers), the distortion would be 10^-26 x 500 nm. Extremely small! Yes, energy and angular momentum is being converted to gravity waves. It has something to do with the quadrupole moment of the stress-energy tensor, but don't ask me the details :-)
to Mohammed Safiuddin (as the reply button was disabled) 1. Why does Earth itself pulls smaller objects? Because Earth also has mass which distorts space, and thus pulls. If you look tentative enough you'll see in the film that while rotating Earth itself bends space. (Perhaps you have seen this, as you have answered alike by yourself, then the answer to your second question comes) 2. Why the Sun can't drag planets close and destroy them? Because of centrifugal force. (hey! they are rotating, have you forgotten? :D) but eventually yes that's theoretically true if to ignore other celestial fates. Just in Case: Don't be disillusioned by the animation, it describes 3-dimensial curvatures, but implies 4-dimensial. So, it is not that type curvature that we are able to see.
There is also the concentration of hydrogen in the universe which can be lower bigger or equal to the critical density, Hubble number. If it is bigger, the universe is closed and will contract, if it is equal it will slow down to equilibrium, if it is lower, it will expand. It is currently lower but close to critical density, it does not expand as fast as it used to. It makes sense since gravity goes against it expansion.
@VineFynn All natural energies exist as the harmonics of families of frequencies that are components of the weaves of the intrinsic lattices of matter which may containtain magnetism, electricity, and other forms of sensitively reactive energies. Day light is earth's atmospheres reactive abillity of radiating its spectral field when excited by the extremely hyper frequencies of black energy.
@ajpmathwiz No, according to the theory of wave-particle duality, waves and particles are the same thing. It's fairly clear you have not studied the topic, or if you have, you have not studied its history. Quantum tunneling was discovered independently and tacked onto the framework. Wave-particle duality is one of the premises of the framework. The framework is counterintuitive mostly because it houses a set of fallacies and contradictions, which you might easily discover upon your own research
no the distance doesn't shrink but the dimenssion of the moving subject does which is a quite diffrente matter and if you are talking from a special relativity aspect . as for the v+c model indeed it has a mathematical background but physicaly it doesn't make sense as the V doesn't have the same physical model as the a normal velocity we know off it doesn't have the same physical dimenssion of the C the speed of light to my knowledge.
I believe there is such a thing as spacetime..it is a good way to expalain alot of things..but very hard to visualize and i do think that blackholes do bend spacetime
okay.. so if the universe is greater than 13.7 billion light years across, that suggests space can expand and change faster than C. so how does the effect of gravity (which is the warping of space and time) still take the speed of light to take effect? they're both antithesis'
I see all kinds of comments., its admirable how the scientists of old took the time to know what they are talking about before publishing.
@orderedntropy so by changing is frequency like in the redshift of hubble, light don´t change momentum? or the compton effect also dosen´t change ligth momentum. light changes momentum by changing frequency ,not speed.
thanks sqee27 for your response. How do you perceive the propagation of gravity? do you think one school of thought out weighs the other?
Now after watching few videos this is the one that best explained the general theory of relativity connection to gravity.
exactly ✌
Not really... this one is “out dated” and only a 2D analogy representing 3D actuality. There are better, newer 3D representations now.
@@scottdenham1795 Thanks for the info.
This exactly the kind of garbaldy-gook speak that turns people off of science and hating lawyers. I’ll just leave it at that. I won’t waste my time with anything further, because people like this are unlikely to understand.
yep... Total waste of time. Beware of the ones who put too much effort in trying to sound smart.... it never works out that way.
@UniverseIsAwesome so diamond is clear as it has a regular atomic structure so makes light zig zag regularly?
Question: If Earth has curved space and space is pushing us towards earth, then how do density contrast in earth have stronger gravitational fields? I have a hard time understanding how space-time would respond to density contrast as we observe gravity doing so in Gravity exploration/measurements around the earth. Please explain if you understand this, thanks
@LeconsdAnalyse does dark energy/matter have any influence on this ?
i have a lot of questions...all the sun is is a huge chunk of fire and burn...it has no gravitational pull does it? and whats with there all the sudden being gravity and force in space? Sorry if these r out of line im ignorant.
who exactly is the geometry of this space-time fabric, because with those animation from the video it seems like there is an up and down, and therefor all gravity orbits, orbit in the same direction....
hope you understand what i mean, im norwegian :)
Thanks, the free-falling example helped me imagine the graph! But how does this translate into the orbits of celestial bodies? Since the speed of Earth orbiting the Sun is constant, where is the curved space trajectory there?
Re: "Exact Wall Soln."/ For example, null `z`-geodesics (ie, x=const.,y=const.) are geodesics on which the element of length is given by: ds2=c2(A)dt2 - (A)^(2n2/1-n)dz2. With A := 1 + a|z|/c2 => dz/dt=c2(A)^B. With B := (2n2 + n -1)/(n-1). Where we MUST have A>0. Note that the light ray undergoes a sharp turn at the `corner` located at z=0. What physical phenomenon would you attribute this effect to ??
Can you recommend one?
thanks but i still have one question. If there is gravitational force between the sun and the earth becuz of the difference in their mass how come humans are not pulled to big buildings by gravity? Or other small objects?
mathematics or physics
I want to jump in, is there not a limit to "physics" when it comes to math? For example is there physically an infinite space between two whole numbers? Or is the universe capable of reflecting a googelplex in real terms? You can fit the world into numbers, but can you fit the numbers into the real world? where not there to many mathematical possibilities in String Theory, to know which one my reflect the laws of the universe? Is the universe open or closed?
This is the only helpful presentation that I can understand so far. So enlightening.
Kevin Fernando Horas I agree. I watched this, and I feel like I had a better picture of what einstein sees.
would we feel the "gravity wave" on earth as a jolt similar to being in a boat experiencing and ocean wave?
i have two questions that i hope someone can explain without sarcasm. i am just trying to learn. the first is'what keeps the earth from spiralling closer and closer to the sun and in time be merged with it as it goes round and round?',the second question is whether the space time fabric as diagrammed functioning like a flat surface. thanks.
This is a very clear presentation of the theory of gravity, but I wonder how many see this and think that the flat representation of space is a concrete model of space. I think it can mislead people who don't understand that this flat representation is only one of an infinite number stacked together to form three dimensional space, and that each flat layer is warped by gravity. I know it complicates the image and the motion of the planet through the flat layers, but it would be a more accurate image.
its up to people's capacity of imagination relative to their memory bank. if they can see a full model of this without the help or use of visual aids, then it wouldnt be misleading at all.
+SMgirlsarah I agree. I understand it more better now. But I cannot imagine in which dimension will mass push the space time curvature. I guess this a complete abstract idea and beyond human senses...
FrankCoffman It is mentioned that the huge mass of objects cause the space-time curve as spacetime is basically a fabric, not an imagination.
Just because you seem to know what you are talking about, I wanted to ask: If gravity is just the curvature of space time, then why should the speed of incoming objects matter in terms of them getting caught in the gravitational well of a nearby planet? I see it kind of like a train track - space bends along many tracks depending on one's distance from the gravitational well. Does the speed of incoming objects affect space-time too? If its too complicated its ok..maybe i should go to university
@gchelem
so one side of sky is red
and one side of sky is blue
is that what you saying?
it should be right that if it is expanding
@jqs1943 I'm not referencing to your outlook on the superstring frequencies of matter, I'm simply stating that the logic in saying "if light and heat came from the sun, would it not be logical to assume that space would be lit up and extremely hot?" is wrong.
It's worth noting that the equation for angular momentum is J=vmr where J is angular momentum, v is tangential velocity, m is mass and r is radius. In the case of an orbiting object, the equation can be arranged as v=J/mr where J and m are constants and v and r are variables. If you calculate J for Earth orbiting the Sun using the semi-major axis then punch in the aphelion and perihelion apsis, you'll see how v (tangential velocity) changes and the effects on centripetal acceleration.
The ultimate unification and understanding of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY manifest as F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Here's the proof. This also explains why objects (including WHAT IS THE FALLING MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS clearly and necessarily F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE.
ON THE CLEAR, EXTENSIVE, SENSIBLE, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND UNIVERSAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly PROVEN TO BE F=MA ON BALANCE:
Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. I have explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
SO if the fabric picture thing is correct that means we are moving closer to the sun each second..?? right ??
I'm honestly not sure what you mean by "Progression effect." Could you elaborate?
While gravity is considered the bending of spacetime in General Relativity, a quantum theory of gravity is still in the works (the graviton being a candidate along with Loop Quantum Gravity and string theory). For more info I recommend visiting 'physics forums' and typing graviton in search.
WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY F=MA (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity AS SPACE ON BALANCE:
TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Hence, the Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. (The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE.) A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=mC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Again, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense.
By Frank DiMeglio
Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
He was, in fact, a total weasel.
c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following:
UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma:
The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!
TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
ok i really have a weird question here what are the dimension of spacetime? and here they are talking about two dimension of space and a single dimension of time what is that actually means ? and i've heard so many people talks about 5th dimensions etc..what are the dimension of spacetime i really need an explanation !
Though the electron is a lot smaller than the proton, the principle remains the same- You might want to check out the CERN videos regarding the LEP (Large Electron Positron collider) 'LEP Stars Underground' which looks at how speeds close to that of light are achieved in accelerators.
if General Theory of Relativity explains the Orbits of Planets around heavy objects , how Polar Satelites are orbiting around Earth ?
if we Picture up a Fabric of spaceTime as a Flat then how would we explain orbit of Polar satelites ?
.
i am Confused a lot
what stops the earth moving in beside the sun..if u put a ball(sun) in the middle of a trampoline and put a smaller ball(earth) on the trampoline the smaller ball will move into the centre beside the bigger ball...but if you throw the smaller ball in a straight line the smaller ball follows the curves and move around in a circle around the larger ball(orbit)...how did the earth get in a position that it is in orbit rather than being pulled in beside the sun due to the curves in the space fabric?
Here are my thoughts. How can you say that there is a fabric bent around an object influencing gravity on at, while also stating if that object were to go away it would then send a ripple that we would feel act on our planet when after our planet leaves in whatever direction it will be traveling through this fabric which also too is warping around earth but offers no resistance to act against us now to stop us. We keep going that way forever then right? So how is it this ripple of the fabric can affect us but not to slow us down as we travel whilst bending through it also? This fabric effects force on us or doesn't? If it does then why would earth keep going into space at a steady speed without any type of friction from this force that has friction when It feels like it?
@ScienceIsKnowledge
There isn't enough room here to explain it fully, but an alternative to spacetime curvature is electromagnetic polarization. Oppositely charged subatomic particles are pushed and pulled by gravity fields, so that while some particles are pushed into a weaker part of the field, others are pulled into a stronger part of the field. This accounts for both the attractive nature and the extreme weakness of gravity.
One biggest question in Einstein's theory: Wtf happened to his hair?
I have a question . since not all object that has mass cause a curvature in spacetime but just the objects with a gravitational field ,how does smaller object's gravity cause any effect and in what form do they exist ? Or are they ignored because the forces are so tiny ?
***** actually I didn't know that . we didn't learn anything like that in school all I know about relativity came from other places and thank you for pointing out that to me :))
@@viadeng WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY:
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.)
Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!!
The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!!
The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
By Frank DiMeglio
Brian Greene is not a genius.
WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY:
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.)
Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!!
The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!!
The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
By Frank DiMeglio
@LeconsdAnalyse aha, it still puzzles me. Something must keep them from crashing into each other even if they don't form a singularity. More strange are comet's orbits.
Does SOUND have mass?
You might also want to take a look at the Vis-viva equation (or the orbital energy conservation equation).
ON THE ESSENTIAL AND NECESSARY RELATION OF E=MC2 AS F=MA (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is clearly gravity AS WHAT IS NECESSARILY POSSIBLE/POTENTIAL AND ACTUAL IN BALANCE:
Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. ACCORDINGLY, the Moon AND THE PLANETS move AWAY very, very, very slightly in comparison to WHAT IS THE SUN !! SO, carefully consider what is THE EYE !! Finally, think about what is the speed of light (c). E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !
Magnificent. It ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense ON BALANCE !!! This does explain the fourth dimension, including the term c4 therewith !!! "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. So, notice that what is THE MOON is basically dead or inert ON BALANCE !!! GREAT. INDEED, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!! The sky is BLUE, AND what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !! (Notice what is THE EYE !!) ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE, AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! Great.
Carefully consider what is the Sun. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Consider what is BALANCED observer dependent/related experience ! Carefully consider the man (INCLUDING what is THE EYE) who actually IS in outer "space". NOW, think about TIME; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. INSTANTANEITY is therefore FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. So, here we have established what can basically and sensibly be understood as constituting a one dimensional relation. A white dwarf star is about the size of the Earth, AND it is ALSO (ON BALANCE) the PROJECTED form or fate (IN TIME) of the Sun !!! Great !!! Stellar clustering ALSO proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Against what is outer "space", why would the Sun maintain what is its "preferential" existence ? The answer is THE EYE/the observer. INDEED, notice that THE EYE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ! Now, ON BALANCE, consider what is the speed of light (c). A galaxy is basically FLAT. SO, think about a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) as well. HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma !! Carefully consider what is THE EYE !!
TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great.
E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM energy.
Excellent !!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand !!!
GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider WHAT IS THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about TIME !!! NOW, the stars AND PLANETS do REMAIN AS what are POINTS in the night sky. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. This explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The fact that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution is not a meaningless coincidence, AS the fact that both the Sun AND the Moon are the SAME SIZE in the sky is not some sort of a meaningless coincidence. Notice the match with the size of what is THE EYE. Magnificent !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Carefully consider what are the POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!! Think about the necessity (or essential nature) of TIME, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma ON BALANCE !!! Great. It is proven.
("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 IS F=ma.) Consider what is THE SUN AND what is THE EARTH/ground in DIRECT comparison, AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!!
GREAT !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio
How can you postulate that there is objects outside of our universe?
ok regarding what you said about quantum mechanic and general relativity this is not the issue because if we wanna discuss that it would take days , my main question was the univese itself composed of matter so the universe contain mass , why is the the acceleration of the universe is faster than light speed although the special relativity says NO OBJECT WITH MASS CAN ACCELERATE TO THE SPEED OF LIGHT ?
Addendum: Place `+/-` in front of the right side of dz/dt. Where +/- refers to an outgoing/incoming light ray, respectively.
So earth moves due to this curvature in the spacial fabric .How does it explain the earth attract all objects towards it as if there was a force acting from the centre pulling everything towards(radially)My doubt here is that if earth has its own curvature in the spacial fabric and if indeed all objects simply follow the curvature then why does the all objects appear to fall towards its centre.
If you have 2 torches a kilometre apart shining their beams towards each other and someone travels back and forth between those torches at one third the speed of light, how can it be explained that the light from both torches is travelling at the speed of light relative to the person travelling back and forth between the torches?
@gchelem
what they are saying is that
all the object's distance is universally expanding
but there were no direction or center
there were no big bang
@VarvaraBell Are you talking about amplifying lasers around the solar system's asteroid belt? Also, apparently gravity waves are still swirling around space-time since the beginning of the universe, and are thought to be exploitable for big bang research. Apparently a satellite is being put up for that purpose.
@DeviousBetrayer i believe that space exists only when someone occupies that area of space/time.therefore space as we know has a finite size yet could expand to an indefinite size. and the universe as we know it has a minimum size of 190(ish with uncertainty) light years.
Thanks, those electric universe vids were really interesting
Interesting.. If there's no such thing as a black hole, then what do you propose?
Hint: Investigate the physical significance of Einstein`s field equation, G=8(pi)T , here in units s.t. "G"=c=1. Where "G" is the gravitational constant, not to be confused with the tensor G. And, divT=0.
I'm still not quite sure I understand what you're saying, so let me know if this doesn't explain anything. An observer always observes his own time to pass at the same rate (everything always seems normal to him.) Now, if you have observer 1 watch observer 2 go by at a high speed, obs1 will see obs2's clock moving more slowly; and the difference depends on what velocity obs1 sees obs2 going at. Perhaps you can explain where a "progression effect" would come into this? There is none.
Basically the Earth's centripetal acceleration (a=v^2/r) approx. equals the gravitational pull of the Sun at Earth's orbit (a=Gm/r^2), conservation of angular momentum (J=vmr) keeps Earth in orbit around the Sun (I've put this in more detail elsewhere in the comments).
Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
He was, in fact, a total weasel.
c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following:
UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma:
The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!
TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
@mucalinda there were already several hints and evidence of it, there was the Michelson Morley Ether experiment and the Maxwell equations for electromagnetism that predicted that an electromagnetic field would travel at a constant speed in space (I think it was calculated closed to the speed of light or it is the same I don´t remember right now).The genius of Einstein was recognizing that Ether was not necessary if the speed of light was the limit, & light was actually an electromagnetic field
travelling at the speed of light reduces length to zero and time to a total stand still, is this not the key to invisibility?
a question. why isnt earth moving closer to the sun? its gravity is keeping us from floating out into space but why do we stay in the same spot. shouldnt we be slowly drifting closer to the sun.
@VarvaraBell Think of it like the ball in roulette, as long as it keeps a high enough speed, it will stay in "orbit", it only rolls in when friction makes its speed too slow. Earth is not subject to friction, and its orbit is (at least fairly) stable.
As the Earth moves away from the Sun, its tangential velocity begins to drop (due to conservation of angular momentum) which means it's centripetal acceleration drops also and it's now overcome by the Suns gravity and begins to fall back towards the Sun where the process begins again, hence a relatively stable, very slightly elliptical, orbit.
I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your second question but I would suggest you take a look at Schwarzschild metric.
THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
The BALANCE of being AND experience is essential. Consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. (SO, think about what is THE EYE.) The orange Sun is lava ON BALANCE !! THINK.
Think about what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Think about TIME. NOW, think about the man who IS in what is outer "space". (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Think about what is THE SUN. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Carefully consider what now follows, as E=MC2 is CLEARLY and NECESSARILY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE.
Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are THE EARTH/ground AND THE SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! Great !!! NOW, think about WHAT IS THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!!
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; as E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, objects (AND WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); as E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE !!!!! It also makes perfect sense that the PLANETS move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) Great. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!!!! Carefully consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Magnificent !!! E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
Generally relativity is political in accordance with maximum money making agenda “physics”. Galaxies disprove Einstein. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Here is the proof.
WHY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEPARATE inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, gravity, AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=MA IN BALANCE:
Gravity is not fully and accurately described or accounted for by the idea of “curved” “space”. Consider the man who IS actually in what is outer “space”. Think about TIME. Consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) what is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, as E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. Think about TIME. Consider what is the speed of light (c). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE.
By Frank DiMeglio
ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=MA ON BALANCE:
The balance of being and experience is essential. THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. GREAT !!! Think. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as E=mc2 is F=ma. Accordingly, the rotation of what is the Moon matches it's revolution. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as E=mc2 is F=ma ON BALANCE. Carefully consider what is the speed of light (c). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the PLANETS will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun. THE EARTH/ground AND what is the Sun are CLEARLY linked AND BALANCED opposites, as E=mc2 is F=ma !!! “Mass”/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE EARTH is blue, AND the sky is ALSO BLUE ON BALANCE. Gravity is CLEARLY proven to be ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy on balance. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 is F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as E=mc2 is F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AND BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
If objects within our universe bends the space fabric in our universe to create gravity, then objects travelling outside our universe towards our objects would be repelled, like anti-gravity. Is that correct?
this helped me a lot thank you!
one question: why doesn't the earth's orbit around the sun change because of it's gravity. If you don't have enough speed to escape it's gravity, my logic says that you eventually will be pulled in, and not maintain a certain orbit around it ?
they put the graphical model of the time-space for better understanding. but the 4D looks like a plain 2d, how do I better understand how massive objects curve the space???
I believe gravitational force is another kind of energy that we can't detect directly yet, we can only feel its presence. It is a kind of energy generated weakly from each atom, able to weakly grasp hold of other atom(s), that is why why more atoms are together, the piled up gravity is much higher.
I'm probably understanding this wrong.....Can someone please explain why does the Earth not fall into (or towards) the Sun in this spacetime curvature (esp. if the mass of the Sun is more at creating a 'deeper' curvature)? I'm missing a piece to this puzzle!?!?!
@rhcp4565 According to the theory, the reason orbiting bodies don't get sucked down the gravitational drain is because there is no friction in space. The centrifugal force of circular motion balances the gravitational force of attraction, and without any friction, this goes on essentially forever.
So .. space-time is stretchable. And, if cause of deformation disappears, it reverts to the original state , them .. wouldn't it make the warping of space-time act like "Ideal Spring" ?
Is everything in the form of solid at absolute zero?
Not fair! If there comes a massive body infront of the violet spaceship, will he still see the velocity of light to b c m/s?
@jqs1943 I'm only 13 and don't completely understand most of the concepts behind advanced physics, I am simply stating what I think is wrong. If I've got my knowledge right, a photon is the virtual particle that is part of the wave-particle duality of light. Also, all objects reflect a certain degree of light, but they also absorb a large quantity. Because light travels so fast, it is absorbed and reflected so fast that we can not visibly trap it. The frequency reflected defines the colour.
WOW! That was really really helpful in understanding General theory of relativity and Newtonian gravitational catastrophe..Thanks for uploading.
Ali Farooq Shaikh damn your comment says 5 yrs ago are you still alive?
Mr. Paresh Dave has given the following writing the thumbs up. Great.
WHY EINSTEIN'S EQUATIONS PREDICT THAT SPACE IS EXPANDING OR CONTRACTING IN AND WITH TIME:
Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. ACCORDINGLY, the known mathematical unification of Einstein's equations AND Maxwell's equations (given the addition of A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION) is proven and explained. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. (Notice the term c4 from Einstein's equations.) It is CLEARLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This is the ultimate unification of physics/physical experience. It ALL makes perfect sense. I have truly unified physics.
Consider THE MAN who IS standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. (Notice that THE DOME of a person's eye is ALSO VISIBLE.) OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND DESCRIPTION) is improved in the truly superior mind. Indeed, the ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. It is ALL CLEARLY proven. In fact, I have also clarified, clearly identified, and corrected the limited notion of curved "SPACE". MY UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS SURPASSES ALL OTHERS. E=mc2 IS F=ma. A galaxy is basically FLAT. Think !!! GREAT. Notice the black space of what is THE EYE as well. It ALL makes perfect sense. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The Sun AND the Earth are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! LOOK at what is the BLUE SKY. The EARTH is ALSO blue. NOW, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.
Beautiful !!!
Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of what is THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. It is fully, CLEARLY, and consistently proven. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY.
By Frank DiMeglio
mind blowing explanation sir
@lukequixotesanjose i think is the same as saying that potential energy as a equivalence with cinetic energy but we both know that in nature they are very diferente.
@8:14...Shows the most accurate picture of space-time that i`ve seen (in these clips) thus far! Note, however, that each 2D plane depicted is really a 3D space.
@jqs1943 I understand somewhat what you are talking about. I'd love you to publish a book of this theory of Sunotics that explains things in laymans terms, and if you can't do that, then link me to some articles or books I could read. Thanks.
This is very excellent explanation of enstiens generel relativity.
i've heard this from one of the american topest physicist and i can send the video to your email if you want about how much energy would it take an atom to accelerate to light speed , my other question is how can they make the subatomic particle accelerate to light speed although they are massive!
They alter the direction of light cones, angling them more towards the time-axis in 4-dim. space-time.
@am101171 ah! and there were also the Lorentz equations that are exactly the same Einstein used for the special theory of relativity, Einstein just put all these together, which might seem little when looked from outside, but it was a big leap that nobody did in 300 years. And this is only for the special theory of relativity.
so in the same principle that you mentioned about matter inside the universe so basically the universe is a vast amount of matter or "energy" but that matter has been accelerating since the big bang . i think this question rises consern to me along with the contradiction between quantum mechanic and general relativity
@b0gdanB Think of a marble rolling around a funnel. Sure, it will eventually fall into the center, but only because friction between the surfaces took away the energy. If it weren't for that, it would roll around the funnel forever.
@mucalinda It's a consiquence of Maxwell's equasions.
@kirox777 The word buss in English means literally "kiss".
@lukequixotesanjose everyting u say is correct, is the actual understanding, or best possible that we have today, as newton and galileo here on the past. of course theres a relation of energy and mass, thats wy the universe works all togheter but saying that things are the same is to much. we need to know the diferences. the fabric of space time is an abstraction, something is happening but assuming a diferente "eter" and some excelente matematics is not anouf.sorry my spelling.
So our solar system is basically a bunch of balls on a flat trampoline type fabric?
Every diagram or model I see of this looks like things would always fall in to the heavy middle object (assuming it didn't initially have the speed to quickly leave the warped fabric)
@mooseythejuiceman of course but i would not really call it " gravity waves "
i will simply call that waves emitted by the destruction of the sun if it happens cause it has to do with the space time
sorry for the english I'm french :)
That surely was helpfull...bt i think the video is too short to explain thr general relativity.... because i understood this video but i want to understand that which only einstein, eddington and chandrashekhar understood....can i get any help plz....???
Well... atoms still move at 0 Kelvin due to the uncertainty principle thought. but without pressure, can, say... 4 atoms in a large space become "solid" if they aren't connected to each other?
@jqs1943 No, because heat diminishes very quickly over the space of a vacumn, because there is very little to carry it. Light simply doesn't react very much to this because it has independent particles, and it's speed never changes. The only reason it may flicker is because it is interferred by air in the last milliseconds from the beginning of our atmosphere into our retinas.The little heat that makes it to earth is majority transferred by IR and UV rays, which are a components of light.
According to the current model of gravity, Einstein's general theory of relativity, gravity is in fact the distortion of space-time (space-time being the mathematical model that unifies the 3 dimensions of space with the one dimension of time). This theory is heavily supported by numerous lines of evidence, including observations of gravitational lensing, gravitational time dilation, gravitational waves, and the perihelion precession of Mercury.
@VarvaraBell In addition, we had initial momentum, and were flung into the Sun's gravity. it's like rolling in a curve around the gravity of the Sun. While we are not subject to friction, we are subject to other sources of gravity and are so losing spin and momentum. Gravity does never completely diminish, as the strength of gravity is the square of it's distance, and so can not be completely eliminated.
What do you mean by "time is linear?" Time isn't absolute, but does share a relationship with space.
In standard geometry the spatial distance between two points was invariant. r²=x²+y²+z². In relativity, this is not the case. With special relativity, a new invariant is defined: s²=t²-r² One way to look at this is that all observers travel at a constant speed through space-time, such that the faster you travel through space, the slower you travel through time.
continued...
Forgive me, I was not saying you didn't understand, only that it has been difficult for me to understand what you're trying to say.
I do believe I understand you now (correct me if I'm wrong). If you have two clocks (initially synchronized) running at different rates, then over a long period of time the difference of time measured on the clocks will become very great. This is correct, and is not a problem for relativity; it is at the heart of time dilation and relativity embraces it.
That`s correct. But the speed of light (in vacuum) is an issue that has been decided in special relativity, this clip is about general relativity. Also, don`t forget about the other three spatial variables.
Even in the "empty" space between Galaxies there is some matter. Maybe only an atom for every 100 cc's of the empty vacuum, but if you measure the vast area of the "emptiness" of inter-galactic space these scattered atoms actually may have more volume (scattered mass?) than MANY Galaxies. I guess it matters how we define the "empty vacuum" of space...
"10^-26 what meters?"
I mean a relative fraction. So the distortion on one meter would be 10^-26 meters. And for the wavelengths of the stars (let's say 500 nanometers), the distortion would be 10^-26 x 500 nm. Extremely small!
Yes, energy and angular momentum is being converted to gravity waves. It has something to do with the quadrupole moment of the stress-energy tensor, but don't ask me the details :-)
to Mohammed Safiuddin (as the reply button was disabled)
1. Why does Earth itself pulls smaller objects? Because Earth also has mass which distorts space, and thus pulls. If you look tentative enough you'll see in the film that while rotating Earth itself bends space. (Perhaps you have seen this, as you have answered alike by yourself, then the answer to your second question comes)
2. Why the Sun can't drag planets close and destroy them? Because of centrifugal force. (hey! they are rotating, have you forgotten? :D) but eventually yes that's theoretically true if to ignore other celestial fates.
Just in Case: Don't be disillusioned by the animation, it describes 3-dimensial curvatures, but implies 4-dimensial. So, it is not that type curvature that we are able to see.
There is also the concentration of hydrogen in the universe which can be lower bigger or equal to the critical density, Hubble number. If it is bigger, the universe is closed and will contract, if it is equal it will slow down to equilibrium, if it is lower, it will expand. It is currently lower but close to critical density, it does not expand as fast as it used to. It makes sense since gravity goes against it expansion.
He has revolutionized the basic concept of gravity.
Thanks! My coursework is all in now so I find out in a few days... Here's hoping ;)
@VineFynn All natural energies exist as the harmonics of families of frequencies that are components of the weaves of the intrinsic lattices of matter which may containtain magnetism, electricity, and other forms of sensitively reactive energies. Day light is earth's atmospheres reactive abillity of radiating its spectral field when excited by the extremely hyper frequencies of black energy.
@ajpmathwiz No, according to the theory of wave-particle duality, waves and particles are the same thing.
It's fairly clear you have not studied the topic, or if you have, you have not studied its history. Quantum tunneling was discovered independently and tacked onto the framework. Wave-particle duality is one of the premises of the framework. The framework is counterintuitive mostly because it houses a set of fallacies and contradictions, which you might easily discover upon your own research
no the distance doesn't shrink but the dimenssion of the moving subject does which is a quite diffrente matter and if you are talking from a special relativity aspect .
as for the v+c model indeed it has a mathematical background but physicaly it doesn't make sense as the V doesn't have the same physical model as the a normal velocity we know off it doesn't have the same physical dimenssion of the C the speed of light to my knowledge.
I believe there is such a thing as spacetime..it is a good way to expalain alot of things..but very hard to visualize and i do think that blackholes do bend spacetime
okay.. so if the universe is greater than 13.7 billion light years across, that suggests space can expand and change faster than C. so how does the effect of gravity (which is the warping of space and time) still take the speed of light to take effect? they're both antithesis'