Razavi Electronics2 Lec21: Computation of Freq. Resp., Freq. Resp. of Common-Emitter/Source Stages

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @ggmb1032
    @ggmb1032 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you so much sir for your generosity of your knowledge and explaining everything so well and in detail. You are blessing and treasure to this world. God bless you and your family.

  • @coolwinder
    @coolwinder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    01:25 - Intro and Review of Lecture 20
    04:28 - General Procedure for Frequency Response Computation
    10:58 - Preview of Analysis Circuits
    13:12 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response
    24:00 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Finding Poles by Inspection
    32:20 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Bode's Plot
    34:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Exact Analysis
    44:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Observations and Dominant Pole Approximation

  • @artemisiasoumpasakou4547
    @artemisiasoumpasakou4547 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I feel that you are more important than Sedra Smith.

    • @alexandrosanastasiou1964
      @alexandrosanastasiou1964 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Και μόνο που ανέβασε τις διαλέξεις αυτές τον καθιστά σκάλες ανώτερο

    • @Gatos77
      @Gatos77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@alexandrosanastasiou1964 Τον έχω συναντήσει από κοντά, θα ανεβάσει κι άλλα στο μέλλον.

    • @zinhaboussi
      @zinhaboussi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      don't say that, sedra and smith are very old than Prof Razavi, smith alone was in his 90 before he died in the end of 2023, it's true that Razavi he initiate good initiatives to help students, but sedra and smith book still have one of the most creative learning approach to simplify microelectronics curriculm to the aspiring students

    • @nikoszervo
      @nikoszervo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is harder to understand the Sedra Smith's book, but it has some more deep explanations. In my opinion, combining Mr's Razavi lectures with Sedra Smith's book is the BEST WAY to learn as of 2024!!! Once you completely master Sedra Smith's book, you move to Arts Of Electronics (which the E-book is free by the way) and you master hundreds of actual circuit applications.

  • @skshrest
    @skshrest 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I humble gratitude to you sir. You are up there withe the best teachers there has ever been.

  • @fadiharb2023
    @fadiharb2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You are the king of analog design world Professor .. thx you a lot

  • @wagsman9999
    @wagsman9999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best instructor on the internet.

  • @GodLeclerc
    @GodLeclerc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    이 형은 진짜다 시벌ㅋㅋㅋ전세계 회로계의 대부님ㄹㅇ 이해가 쏙속 가네

  • @umapatikumarsinha2077
    @umapatikumarsinha2077 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you are amazing

  • @anafivp7897
    @anafivp7897 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    nice lecture

  • @mnada72
    @mnada72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Waiting eagerly for circuit theory I & II and the rest of the series.

    • @felixqi6659
      @felixqi6659 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here I see you again, XDD

    • @mnada72
      @mnada72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@felixqi6659 I have gone through the whole 90 episode , I wish there is more , this guy is a genius

    • @felixqi6659
      @felixqi6659 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mnada72 Of course u r right, he is "the God of Electronics."

  • @muratt6894
    @muratt6894 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank You

  • @amitgalkin1215
    @amitgalkin1215 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you so much!

  • @alex_hiller
    @alex_hiller ปีที่แล้ว

    I think Prof Razavi's denominator in the transfer function at 43:00 might be wrong.
    I put the KCL equations through a symbolic solver and got the following for the transfer function :
    R_D*(g_m - C_GS*s)/R_D*R_G*s^2*(C_DB*C_GD + C_DB*C_GS + C_GS^2) + s*(C_DB*R_D + C_GD*R_D*R_G*g_m + C_GD*R_G + C_GS*R_D + C_GS*R_G) + 1.
    The difference being with the square term on the denominator, where instead of C_GS*C_GB, I got C_GS^2. Not super important, but caused me some confusion.

    • @GautamGarg_0
      @GautamGarg_0 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I carried out the calculations myself, his function is correct. You must have made some mistake in between

  • @fabianporras8585
    @fabianporras8585 ปีที่แล้ว

    muchas gracias!

  • @mrpossible5696
    @mrpossible5696 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ty

  • @alexandrosanastasiou1964
    @alexandrosanastasiou1964 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    One question, at ~ 31:50 why is the transistor Current Source = g_m * V_1 considered an independent current source? This source should not be set to zero.

    • @jovandrum21
      @jovandrum21 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yes, but because the input voltage goes to zero, V1 also is zero, and hence gmV1 is zero

  • @inquisitortr7930
    @inquisitortr7930 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How we write transfer function directly.Can someone explain?

    • @anaseshmawi568
      @anaseshmawi568 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      you need to use algebra and etc

    • @harithagb5514
      @harithagb5514 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's a separate video on that, I think it's lecture 18

  • @zinhaboussi
    @zinhaboussi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    who tried to find the transfer function but stopped and didn't finish it xD

  • @vancart47
    @vancart47 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    until this video there was no ads but in this one there is like ads for every 5 minute. is that same with you guys or only me ?