Thank you so much sir for your generosity of your knowledge and explaining everything so well and in detail. You are blessing and treasure to this world. God bless you and your family.
01:25 - Intro and Review of Lecture 20 04:28 - General Procedure for Frequency Response Computation 10:58 - Preview of Analysis Circuits 13:12 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response 24:00 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Finding Poles by Inspection 32:20 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Bode's Plot 34:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Exact Analysis 44:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Observations and Dominant Pole Approximation
don't say that, sedra and smith are very old than Prof Razavi, smith alone was in his 90 before he died in the end of 2023, it's true that Razavi he initiate good initiatives to help students, but sedra and smith book still have one of the most creative learning approach to simplify microelectronics curriculm to the aspiring students
It is harder to understand the Sedra Smith's book, but it has some more deep explanations. In my opinion, combining Mr's Razavi lectures with Sedra Smith's book is the BEST WAY to learn as of 2024!!! Once you completely master Sedra Smith's book, you move to Arts Of Electronics (which the E-book is free by the way) and you master hundreds of actual circuit applications.
I think Prof Razavi's denominator in the transfer function at 43:00 might be wrong. I put the KCL equations through a symbolic solver and got the following for the transfer function : R_D*(g_m - C_GS*s)/R_D*R_G*s^2*(C_DB*C_GD + C_DB*C_GS + C_GS^2) + s*(C_DB*R_D + C_GD*R_D*R_G*g_m + C_GD*R_G + C_GS*R_D + C_GS*R_G) + 1. The difference being with the square term on the denominator, where instead of C_GS*C_GB, I got C_GS^2. Not super important, but caused me some confusion.
One question, at ~ 31:50 why is the transistor Current Source = g_m * V_1 considered an independent current source? This source should not be set to zero.
Thank you so much sir for your generosity of your knowledge and explaining everything so well and in detail. You are blessing and treasure to this world. God bless you and your family.
01:25 - Intro and Review of Lecture 20
04:28 - General Procedure for Frequency Response Computation
10:58 - Preview of Analysis Circuits
13:12 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response
24:00 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Finding Poles by Inspection
32:20 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Bode's Plot
34:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Exact Analysis
44:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Observations and Dominant Pole Approximation
I feel that you are more important than Sedra Smith.
Και μόνο που ανέβασε τις διαλέξεις αυτές τον καθιστά σκάλες ανώτερο
@@alexandrosanastasiou1964 Τον έχω συναντήσει από κοντά, θα ανεβάσει κι άλλα στο μέλλον.
don't say that, sedra and smith are very old than Prof Razavi, smith alone was in his 90 before he died in the end of 2023, it's true that Razavi he initiate good initiatives to help students, but sedra and smith book still have one of the most creative learning approach to simplify microelectronics curriculm to the aspiring students
It is harder to understand the Sedra Smith's book, but it has some more deep explanations. In my opinion, combining Mr's Razavi lectures with Sedra Smith's book is the BEST WAY to learn as of 2024!!! Once you completely master Sedra Smith's book, you move to Arts Of Electronics (which the E-book is free by the way) and you master hundreds of actual circuit applications.
I humble gratitude to you sir. You are up there withe the best teachers there has ever been.
You are the king of analog design world Professor .. thx you a lot
Best instructor on the internet.
이 형은 진짜다 시벌ㅋㅋㅋ전세계 회로계의 대부님ㄹㅇ 이해가 쏙속 가네
you are amazing
nice lecture
Waiting eagerly for circuit theory I & II and the rest of the series.
Here I see you again, XDD
@@felixqi6659 I have gone through the whole 90 episode , I wish there is more , this guy is a genius
@@mnada72 Of course u r right, he is "the God of Electronics."
Thank You
thank you so much!
I think Prof Razavi's denominator in the transfer function at 43:00 might be wrong.
I put the KCL equations through a symbolic solver and got the following for the transfer function :
R_D*(g_m - C_GS*s)/R_D*R_G*s^2*(C_DB*C_GD + C_DB*C_GS + C_GS^2) + s*(C_DB*R_D + C_GD*R_D*R_G*g_m + C_GD*R_G + C_GS*R_D + C_GS*R_G) + 1.
The difference being with the square term on the denominator, where instead of C_GS*C_GB, I got C_GS^2. Not super important, but caused me some confusion.
I carried out the calculations myself, his function is correct. You must have made some mistake in between
muchas gracias!
Ty
One question, at ~ 31:50 why is the transistor Current Source = g_m * V_1 considered an independent current source? This source should not be set to zero.
Yes, but because the input voltage goes to zero, V1 also is zero, and hence gmV1 is zero
How we write transfer function directly.Can someone explain?
you need to use algebra and etc
There's a separate video on that, I think it's lecture 18
who tried to find the transfer function but stopped and didn't finish it xD
until this video there was no ads but in this one there is like ads for every 5 minute. is that same with you guys or only me ?
No
Same