Every PROTESTANT should WATCH this VIDEO on EUCHARIST ! ( Bishop BARRON )
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- #catholic #catholichurch #catholicism
JD Catholic Engage is a Catholic channel that seeks to foster a deeper understanding of our Catholic faith by engaging with atheists, Protestants, non-Christians, and our fellow Catholics.
00:01 Intro
01:21 The only Command Human beings have followed
03:53 Three point Summary
05:07 Christianity is not a Self Help Group
07:47 Three Point Summary
Original Video: • Bishop Robert Barron's...
Support - / jdcatholicengage
Get in touch - jdonhigh@gmail.com
Instagram - / jdcatholicengage
Tiktok- / jdsongonfirecatholic
Facebook - / songonfire16
Bishop Barron did an outstanding video series on Catholicism. I highly suggest it.
This is My Body. This is My Blood - words that can never be changed nor altered!
I also include you don’t get eternal life from eating an ordinary piece of bread
@@simonslater9024You're right, but only if you believe it is just an ordinary piece of bread? No faithful Christians believed that until the 17th century. If you're seeking what is correct, why go to the 17th century, why not to the first or second century? What did the early Christians believe?
@@ivanmijatovic3564i was attacking protestant’s and especially evil Evangelical’s/fundamentalist’s who believe it’s only symbolic that’s why i said you DO NOT get eternal life from an ordinary piece of bread. I as a Marian Catholic must receive Jesus LITERALLY in holy communion in a state of grace to receive eternal life. Protestant’s are NOT Christian and protestant”baptism” IS INVALID. God bless. And it’s what the holy Catholic Church has infallibly taught for two thousand year’s it’s the deceived protestant’s who’ve believed lies for the last 500 year’s.
This is beautiful! Keep posting!
Lovely video! Thank you!
God bless🕯🕯🕯
God bless you JD.
Thank you for this video
Wow just wow I’m in awe so beautifully said by beloved bishop baron
a very good point Bishop Barron added to the Vatican II teaching
Amen
communion is the body and blood of the Lord Jesus
Yes, the Eucharist is the Body, Blood , Soul and Divinity all in one.
It has been set up as a New covenant. The clauses of the covenant is, this is my body, take it; this is my blood drink it. The clauses of the covenant has to be faithfully observed then only one will get the rights emanating therefrom. But the Protestants misinterpret it. St.Paul clearly states in 1 Corinthians it is not idolatry. But the Protestants misinterpret the very same verse. St. Paul further says you get diseased because you eat the ' body' without discernment. John Chapter 6 is very clear. Jesus stick to his statement in spite of many left Jesus because of his statement. Peter on behalf of the Apostles believed. The Catholics are are followers of Christ through Peter.
..the repentance of sins over and over again,the insistence of an Alter Christus to give you your last rites ( what happens after he leaves the room?),the works based reliance on your works in fulfilling the law is all unbiblical. Does the Roman Catholic have peace with God? I think not. Martin Luther had the same problem and realised on by complete Faith in Christ can a person be truly saved.
@@chrismachin2166 You (Protestants) say works are useless. You believe faith alone is needed for salvation. Nobody is justified by Law. Hence you reject the Law. More over, the Law is all about works. If it is so, why are you accusing the Catholics of idolatry, referring to the 2nd commandment? Are the ten commandments part of the Law? What legitimacy the Protestants have to accuse Catholics when they themselves say man is not justfied by Law? Are you not kicking against your own tenets?
@@chrismachin2166 Jesus has said a sinner is a slave of sin. What connection light has with darkness? If you mix 99 bottles of pure water with one bottle of impure water, can you drink it?. The body is God's temple. Can God dwell in an unholy temple, God being the most holy? What is the wages of sin? Will this eternal truth ever change? Once Saved Always Saved, is a treachery similar to the one used by satan in the Eden. Hearing his tutorial, the fruit appeared to Eve beautiful, tasteful to eat and desirable to give knowledge. Thus satan uses this OSAS to cheat the simpletons.
@@chrismachin2166 A comment I uploaded is missing. You (Protestants) profess faith alone is needed for salvation. Nobody is justfied by the observance of Law. Works are not needed for jusfication. Thus you reject the Law. Are the 10 commandments part of Law? Is not the Law about works?. When you thus reject the Law as not neccessary for salvation, what right or legitimacy you have to ask the Catholics to observe or not to violate the 2nd commendment? Are you not kicking against the basement of yor tenet?
@@sebinantony6983 Do you believe in the imputation of the active obedience of Christ by faith alone ,in Christ alone? Or are you reliant on a works based righteousness,that in some /most (?)cases requires the unbiblical “purgatory “ to cleanse a person - which is totally anti Gospel.
Confessional lutherans believe that Holy Eucharist is Christ for you, for the forgiveness of your sins.
The sacrament of confession Jn 20:23 frees us from our sins so that we can receive His grace via the Eucharist
Lutherans do not believe in the real presance fully & properly & do not have a real priesthood.
Only Catholics do.
I believe they do ..Luther , as far as I know was a believer in a real presence .
@@tomgreene1843 not 100% & not fully properly as Catholics...hence heretic.
@@SparkyBobcat-el8hf I would be slow to attach a % to his belief system , but it was not a catholic expression of the faith . Some Anglicans would probably accord with his belief . Much of his disagreement was in the realm of change as expressed in Catholic tradition and also remaining change. Again, the reformed traditions were not and are not in agreement among themselves as far as I know.
I have to ask, why is Jenifer Anniston in the thumbnail? The only thing I’ve heard from her remotely close to theology is that dating is hell for her now that she’s past 50. Why is she in it?
Yes, I wondered as well.
"Take, eat," not "Take, understand."
Excellent comment. If Protestants belief, they will understand but not vice versa!
Perhaps, you should read Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 11. "Discern" means understand!
If you're not Catholic nor in a state of grace, don't take.
@@danielobrien189 I love religious battles. It just proves that you are worshiping your own fairytales.
@@Videx19always be prepared to make a defense for the faith in your heart.
What's woth the photo of jennifer aniston? Is she catholic? Was she at the congres
Very good
br
Romans 1:16
For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.
1 Corinthians 1:18
For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
(1 Corinthians 15:1-4). THE GOSPEL OF YOUR SALVATION THAT SAVES YOU BY BELIEVING, PAUL SPEAKING
This is the only Gospel that can save your soul today there is no other
Moreover, brethren, I declared unto you the Gospel which I preached unto you,
which also you have received, and wherein you stand, by which also you are saved
if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain.
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received,
how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures,
And that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Romans 2:16 paul speaking
16 in the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.
2 Corinthians 5:21
21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace, you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
The gospel is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes (Romans 1:16).
2 thes 2:13-15 CHOSEN TO SALVATION
13 But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
14 whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
SALVATION It is not based on human traditions, rituals, or works, but on the finished work of Christ on the cross.
He died for our sins, was buried, and rose again on the third day, according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).
Romans 8:28-30 Called
28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
NO HUMAN WORKS is allowed in salvation.
No Confessing JESUS AS LORD TO BE SAVED, NO WATER BAPTISM that is not the gospel
NO ASKING JESUS INTO YOUR HEART TO BE SAVED THATS NOT THE GOSPEL
WE ARE NOT SAVED BY FOLLOWING THE LEVITICAL LAW OF THE OLD TESTAMENT! TO BE SAVED
Its Not Turning From Our SINS And Then Believe The Gospel thats adding a work to the gospel
NOR ARE WE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE LAW AFTER WE ARE SAVED! TO STAY SAVED
SALVATION IS OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR ALL WHO "BELIEVE" THE GOSPEL 1 COR 15:1- 4 KJV
BASED ON THE DEATH, BURIAL, & PHYSICAL RESURRECTION OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST.
Ephesians 1:13-14
13 In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,
14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it, to the praise of his glory.
Romans 8:2 ESV
For the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death.
Romans 5:9 amplified
Therefore, since we are now justified (acquitted, made righteous, and brought into right relationship with God) by Christ's blood, how much more [certain is it that] we shall be saved by Him from the indignation and wrath of God.
Colossians 1:20 The Blood Of Jesus
20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.
Revelation 1:5 THE BLOOD OF JESUS CHRIST
5 and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood,
Ephesians 1:7 The Blood Of Jesus
7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace
1 Corinthians 1:18-24
18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
Pauls strong message to those that preach another gospel
If any religion or church or person teaches or adds anything to the gospel of our lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to be saved, they and all who believe in them and trust in them according to Paul they are accursed. (damned).
What happens if we or an Angel From Heaven Preach a different Gospel then Paul preached. Paul preached the Gospel by revelation of Christ.
(Galatians 1:1-12) Paul Was Taught The Gospel By Jesus Himself
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ
unto another Gospel: Which is not another, but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
As we said before, so I say now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you then that ye have received, let him be accursed.
But I certify you, brethren that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it
but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Well done sir, can you throw some light on the C C C. I mean some important teachings.
If somebody spilled blood on you, would you wash yourself in water or would you say you're clean? Blood stains. Cheerio.
Wait till you read what the Jews had to do to in the temple to repent, before Jesus came to be the all sufficient sacrificial lamb.
Don't like a lay person giving communion
Yes, the sacred body & blood should only be distributed by consecrated hands.
There are people who are homebound and or live in assisted living that need someone to bring the Eucharist. There are not enough Priest or deacons to offer communion service to the multitudes of homes and facilities.
The practice has been around from the earliest records. Read up on Tarcisius, a boy of about 10 years, who was martyred by Romans soldiers while attempting to deliver the consecrated Eucharist to condemned prisoners persecuted for their faith.
Piety demands wholehearted reverence to God. A pair of clean hands comes first from God, then our own hearts. When we speak of 'ex opere operato', we speak of God doing His work through mortal sinful men. When we receive the Body of Christ, our own worthiness is what counts.
@chommie5350 - "Don't like a lay person giving communion" - then why aren't YOU a priest ??
Not a layman or a nun... While there are priests, I only receive communion with the priest. Lay people, especially those who are sinful and a nun, cannot give Holy Communion. The priest at the altar utters the words and washes his hands and the gentleman cleans him as a consecrated person. Although the church approved it, to me it is the Protestant part as well as the little girl ministers. And when there are priests, individual priests give to the laity or honorable to distribute Holy Communion. I recently read from our priest that it is also a sin for those priests because this rule is used only in exceptional situations, and not every day as a normal rule. No lay man can touch the holy Hosts with his hands and still give communion. Who guarantees that this person lives virtuously, contritely, humbly, that he does not gossip and who knows what other sins may be. I personally would never take it if the priest himself told me or offered it. Why.? Because I am not worthy to touch and share the Holy Body of Jesus in the Holy Host with my dirty hands and my sinfulness. I think that even a layman who decides to do this has a great responsibility before the Lord. They should think carefully before deciding to do so. It is only a human rule made by people and not God's rule. . God's is certainly not and differs surely from our human thinking. She would rather be without communion than take Holy Communion like that. I only took it like that two or three times, not from a layman but a nun, and I also felt in my heart that I should have gone to the side where the priest is. I also know about the rule of mortal danger, lay people can give a blessing or baptize a person or bless him in a mortal situation. But these are exceptional and rare situations. This and the little girl ministers go as if it were normal. It is not normal while there are priests in that church and boys for ministers. It is better to be without a minister than to see girls on the altar. And then people are surprised that women want to be priests. With God, things don't work the way we humans think and imagine... God bless your Holy Apostolic Church so that they remain faithful to you and love you with all their heart and soul all who are within the Church and bless that the Holy Spirit blesses young people to decide on spiritual vocations. Jesus, I trust in you! Holy Mary, mediators of God's Mercy, pray for us! Jesus my GOD and all mine!
Go Pope !!!
God reveals in Leviticus how to worship. Jesus reveals the new way to worship him at the last supper, the Eucharist. Seems pretty clear the Catholics are following Jesus’ message on worship with the Mass.
I don’t think the problem is with the Eucharist itself it’s usually about the interpretation
This is theology of the real presence of those who never repent or easily forget the commandments but still role play Christianity: Say that the bread completes what you missed to do and automatically receive merit from eating the body. Instead of changing the ways, they promote a piece of bread to the level of transfiguration which they only need to eat. But do these people ever fulfill Christ's calling for repentance?
Of course they do, all the time - Catholics repent of their sins through the sacrament of reconciliation (confession), including venial sins, although these are repented during mass and need not be repented in confession. Most importantly all Catholics know that they cannot partake of holy communion if they have committed mortal sins and must go to confession before doing so.
@@Vigula Barron only preaches to his own. He holds Good News Conferences, which the cost to get in is 2k - Billy Graham the evangelist charged zero to get into his Crusades. He gave away his materials and books. Barron can't just preach and teach to Catholics - and then someone say Protestants should listen to this - Protestants aren't Barron's target
... Catholics firmly believe partaking in Communiom without first repenting (First partaking in the Sacrament of Confession which includes self reflection and confessing of sins with the resolution to never commit those same sins again) would be a great condemnation on one's soul. To consume Holy Communion while in a state of sin, and non repentance is a huge sin in itself. This is scriptual aswell.
I think no one can truly fulfill the call for repentance - Romans 3, Because all people have sinned, they have fallen short of God's glory
Clown boy once consecrated its no longer bread but the actual body of Christ.
Duh....not very Christian or smart are you...heretic.
Paul also teach that in 1Co 11:23-29 or just read all chapter to understand it.
I notice in Roman Catholic church. Correct me if I am wrong.
Only the priest drink. why?
Jesus gave it to all.
Partaking of Holy Communion in remembrance of Jesus does not mean it is not still trully His body and His blood. As Jesus said it was in John 6. Specifically John 6:48-70. Notice His followers turned away from Him when He said this, even then.
The communion host are both the blood and flesh of Christ, and therefore consuming only the bread, or only the wine would be sufficicent and valid.
In most churches the wine can be recieved by the laity during Christmas and Easter.
The biggest reasons why the wine is not available for the laity during most celebrations of the Mass are; there are too many people to give wine to in adition to communion hosts, and because of the recent pandemic.
Here is an answer on Quora that gives a better answer to your question :
"There is no theological justification for only the priest(s) receiving the cup during the Eucharist (the mass).
Theologically, it is sufficient for anyone to receive only one element or the other - the consecrated bread and wine are both fully the Body and Blood of Christ. This is, however, never a sufficient excuse to deny the assembly both species.
It is a liturgically deficient sign to receive only one or the other if both are possible (obviously for alcoholics or celiac sufferers, only one is the best option). The command of Christ was to take both, and this command was not limited to any one office, ministry, or order.
There may occasionally be pastoral or practical reasons which justify the restriction, however:
If you have an excessively large assembly. Try imagining serving the cup at a papal mass in St. Peter’s Square, for example!
If there is significant and immediate threat of a communicable disease in the community - an outbreak of avian flu or some such - is a good reason not to share the cup for a while. As a precaution.
If a parish or community is too poor to afford wine. It does not cost much to get enough wine for communion, but in extremely poor places or where the cost of wine is prohibitively expensive, it might be practically necessary to limit its use. This would never be justifiable in a place like Italy, for example, but maybe in Tristan da Cunha or Little Diomede it might be cost-prohibitive to import wine.
A prejudice against using ‘extraordinary’ ministers of communion to ensure an adequate number of ministers is not a theologically justified excuse, either. It’s just clericalism."
@@tedeibeakawaii I know the bread and wine is only symbol of the flesh and blood of Jesus.
But not an excuse the many people why they can't drink also. Because it's need to bread and wine. Not only bread. That is why don't make excuses for your wrong doing.
@@jomerorobia4140 It is not just a symbol. It is truly the body and blood of Jesus. He is truly present in The Eucharist.
@@tedeibeakawaii don't deceive yourself. Bread and wine is only a symbol of the flesh and blood of Jesus. Yes it is the flesh and blood of Jesus but in truth also that is bread and wine.
And yet, if you take consecrated elements to a chemical laboratory, they'll turn out to be bread and wine. So how does transubstantiaton occur? What is it really?
One answer is consubstantiation, but that seems like weaseling a bit. And the "symbolic" answer seems to deny the words of Christ.
I can only come out where the church does--it's a mystery. I won't understand it but I can still act on it.
the theology of "the presence" is "christ in you", temples of God, the body of christ/the church.
i am the bread of life. not like the manna that came down from heaven that they ate in the wilderness and died. not something you hold in your hand and put in your mouth.
not like the pagans who make cakes to their gods and then eat them as their flesh and blood.
the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking but righteousness, peace and joy in the holy spirit. go figure. the "mystery" of the church, according to paul, is "christ in you".
no longer a mystery. if you do not have the spirit of christ, you do not belong to him.
Sorry for the spelling mistakes, I just get all upset with the Catholic Church LIES.
This is pretty much what Martin Luther was proclaiming 500 years ago.
The problem is the hyper focus on the metaphysical and not remembrance through the action. The bread and wine IS Christ. Scripture just never clarifies how and in what sense directly because the point is not the substance but the action. Rome has become obsessed with the substance and has forgotten the action. And worse, this has created several generations of fallen away Catholics who focus on their faith in their faith rather than keeping their eyes directly on Jesus. You don’t do that by internalizing the idea of consuming him literally but rather by taking in the truth of his father which is his word.
@@HillbillyBlack So are you saying that focusing on receiving Jesus body and blood daily, is NOT keeping the eyes on Jesus? I am confused.
@@ToubaYouness receiving it thinking about the purpose of what he achieved is keeping your eyes on Jesus not thinking about the idea that you’re actually consuming him. That’s like having faith in your faith versus keeping your eyes directly on Christ in every aspect of life including the Eucharist. It’s his redemption for our sin we must keep in mind.
@@HillbillyBlackclown boy we focus on Jesus as we have the true catholic faith he gave us.
We ADORE him as he lives in our churches physically presant " Body, Blood, Soul & Divinty" in the Holy Sacramental , Consecrated Eucharist.
You satanic heretics with your false gospel, false protestant denominations & false churches DO NOT HAVE Jesus living in your churches to visit & be with/ talk to Adore face to face.
Your a heretic.
Apostles were Catholic....duh.
@@HillbillyBlackClown boy we see Jesus being sacrificed & offered up in our Holy Sacramental Masses every hour of every day...just like he did himself on Holy Thursday ( offering up.his own body & blood to the Father in sacrifice in the Holy Mass ~ before he offered himself up.on the crucifix on good Friday).
We see Holy Thursday & Good Friday & every sacrificial sacramental Holy Mass since St.Peter offered up the 1st one after Christ ...as they are THE SAME REDEMPTIVE HOLY SACRIFICE OF Christ.
You are an uneducated brainwashed protestant heretic...you know ZERO about the true religion.
No in Indiana
Indianapolis
Constantly putting pictures of celebrities in your videos as click bait stops me from wanting to watch your posts. As a fellow catholic I don’t feel that you need to be dishonest to get more views. Just go back to posting quality videos with interesting content.
Do "THIS" . . .? I was raised by Catholic parents. And NEVER, even once, did the Catholic Church hold a PASSOVER SEDER. And I have never heard that they ever do or ever have.
Totally failing to follow the words of Jesus.
The priest acting in "persona Christi?" Where is that in the Bible? 1 Timothy 2:5 "For there is one God, and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus:". Mark 7:6-8 He said to them, “Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written, ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.’ You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.”
Christ already came in judgment upon the house of Israel. The Lords Supper has already been fulfilled.
1 Corinthians 11 :20-34
When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.
For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken.
What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? what shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not.
For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:
After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.
Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another.
And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.
The Sacrifice of God is past, present and future! It is eternal because it is outside of space and time. The sacrifice by Christ dying and suffering was done in space and time 2000 years ago, when Christ (God) chose to became man (incarnate), this is when He went inside space and time. The holy sacrifice of the Mass is a "sacrifice" being presented to us again on a daily basis, and this sacrifice is outside space and time in a mystical and spiritual way because God is not limited in space and time, EVERYTHING TO HIM is an eternal event, and this is the only sacrifice pleasing to God The Father.
Why do you think St. Paul was instructing the Corinthians about The Eucharist if it is not an eternal sacrifice or just a mere "symbol".
(1 Corinthians 11:27), Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.
- And this was after Christ's Ascension.
The early believers broke bread daily from house to house Acts 2 41-46. They participated in the Lords Supper daily from house to house. We need the bread and the wine and participate in Jesus body and blood. The bread from the Lords Table is for our health and the blood for forgiveness of sins and protection.
The problem is the hyper focus on the metaphysical and not remembrance through the action. The bread and wine IS Christ. Scripture just never clarifies how and in what sense directly because the point is not the substance but the action. Rome has become obsessed with the substance and has forgotten the action. And worse, this has created several generations of fallen away Catholics who focus on their faith in their faith rather than keeping their eyes directly on Jesus. You don’t do that by internalizing the idea of consuming him literally but rather by taking in the truth of his father which is his word.
Sadly still do not beleive. If you were on the same table. God is in front of you who created everthing and say “ take this this is my body and and my blood “ would you resist and not believe him. He did not say this bread and this wine is my body and blood. He said this is my blood and my body. And why did Christ repeat this in the road to emeus if this is symbolic.
@@ernestosarmiento1273 but see here’s what you’re doing, you’re proving my point. The message was not the hyper inflated focus on any transformation but rather what it meant and every time I harp on this people keep going back to the very thing I’m calling out. As believers and followers in our savior your focusing on the carnality of the transformation versus what it actually represents I never once said symbolism of the bread and wine I said it’s remembrance of what he did on the cross. And that is what Rome continually over and over and over again Misses.
As a follower of Christ I see it as Christ not literally, not spiritually just as is because my focus is not on the DNA substructure metaphysical transformation materialism yada yada yada but rather what he did for us and I keep my eyes on Christ that way versus some miracle that may or may not be happening. I have no issues leaving it a mystery whereas Catholics can’t let it go and they focus on what’s in their mouth versus understanding why this was instituted in the first place.
In Passover the Israelites did not focus on the lamb in their mouth but rather the bloodshed that protected them from the angel of death in Egypt. That is the remembrance factor. Deliverance
And until people realize the ones for all sacrifice of Christ and the reason for everything, they will continually be stuck in a silent unknowingly ignorant apostasy
@@HillbillyBlack It is our Lord Christ who instructed us to do it more often in remembrance of Him. Just after resurrection He repeat it for the 2 disciples on the road to emeus to remind us to follow His intention. Even the disciples at first find it hard to accept it. As a catholic and in obidience to our Lord Jesus Christ the eucharist is the central of our faith becouse our Lord wanted it that way. Without the eucharist the catholic religion cease to exist. We should not get tired of it and make some justification.
@@ernestosarmiento1273 there you go, that’s an accurate depiction of it but what you did before was not. The Lord supper is something to practice every time we meet yes, it is a partial centrality for the practice of the Saints. Not something an unbeliever should partake just because they’re called Catholic. You’re not under just because you’re Catholic. the readings, the homily, sermons are primary because the work of a priest and pastor is not primarily the Eucharist but the proclamation of the gospel
The First Protestant= John 6:66.
The First Catholic= John 6:68--69.
I do have a problem with catholics only taking the body and not the blood. I understand that it's understood that the body contains both. But that isn't what scripture says...
As an Eastern Orthodox I did too - something that DID initially stop me - before I checked up on the Catholic eucharistic miracles. Do check it out. I think it will do it for you. In any event it's not always so that they give out only one species. Local priest dips the host in the wine. I will convert soon to the CC. This is no more an issue /problem for me who comes from an Eastern Orthodox background. Re
Remember to check Eucharistic miracles out.
@locksmith9498 thanks but dipping it in the wine makes me think of when Jesus dips the sop into the wine and gives it to Judas.
@@ryanteuscher7996 Trust the authority of the Church that Jesus gave authority. Proverbs 3:5-6 /'Trust wholeheartedly in the Lord
rather than relying on your own intelligence.
In everything you do, acknowledge him,
and he will see that your paths are straight.'
@locksmith9498 I recently converted to catholicism. I would say that I kinda just jumped into the deep end. Knew this would have to be something experienced rather than learned. My journey through revelation of the mysteries brought me to the church. Logic and reason are apologetic tools used by catholic answers and even Aquinas himself. Yet when I give logic and reason back, I'm trusting in my own understanding. Are we not placing our trust in others understanding and reason within the body of Christ? I understand the collective mind when it comes to church teaching. Site that only instead of a Saint or church father that supports the idea. Peter even being the head was caught up in people pleasing. Why do you avoid my reason and logic. Or should Paul have come to Peter with a rod instead of words?
So diping the sop and receiving that vs. Thaking the sacraments how they were originally administered. The church does a very good job on explaining everything but this one not yet. I'll have to reread the catechism on this one.
@@ryanteuscher7996 You HAVE to go talk to a priest. You shouldn't have to feel like this.
Well, he says to do it in REMEMBRANCE of me. In remembrance of his one perfect sacrifice for ALL your sin. You can’t add to perfection, complete forgiveness, complete atonement for sin.
Before he died he said “it is finished”.
The Father poured out his wrath on the son and Jesus asked why he had forsaken him.
The Father separated himself from the Son because he cannot abide with sin.
Through the miracle of THE CROSS, Jesus bore or sins and paid the penalty for them.
ALL the sins of his chosen ones were forgiven at THE CROSS.
We have a cross as our symbol because it is THERE that we were forgiven and transferred into the Kingdom of His beloved Son.
If his atonement wasn’t complete it wasn’t perfect.
Only the perfect, sinless God /man can atone for sin.
We can’t possibly add anything to his one perfect atonement.
Scripture does not say anything even remotely that Christ’s one time sacrifice was not complete or that anything else would be added to it.
You receive Gods perfect imputed righteousness, and by this, salvation, only through his one atonement for sin.
What in the world can you add to his imputed righteousness given to you?
If you are born again you have the indwelling Holy Spirit and your name is written in the Lambs Book Of Life.
The Bible says “Christ died ONCE to atone for sin”
Of course we cannot add to perfection. Unless the One and Perfect so wishes. And his command is clear: he wills that we participate to our own redemption through faith, prayer, exercise of vertues, fasting, confession, communion, and all other sacrament that he instituted for us.
Protestants always seem to miss the idea that Jesus wants us to take part of salvation, not because his sacrifice was not enough but because he loves us to the point of making us like gods.
What's with Jennifer Aniston 😅
Th e gates of hell shall not prevail against His church the Catholic church that is not 1 that came along some 1500 or so years later do some research you'll find the answers in the early church fathers
The New Catholic Encyclopedia cautions: “We should not rely too heavily on the literalness of the words ‘This IS my body’ or ‘This IS my blood.’ For in phrases such as ‘the harvest IS the end of the world’ or ‘I AM the true vine’ the [verb “to be”] means only to signify or represent.” Even this authoritative encyclopedia admits that the wording of Matthew 26:26-28 does not prove that the bread and wine were changed into Jesus’ literal body and blood at the Last Supper!
If the encyclopedia indicates that we are not to literally believe 'This is my body' or 'This is my blood,' then it goes against a main tenet of the Catholic Church and would not be valid. At the minimum, it has no doctrinal authority over any scripture, sacred tradition, council doctrine, catechism, or Church Fathers' teachings. When trying to understand something, it is always best to go to the source of official Doctrine/Church teachings/Canon.
The Catholic Church teaches that the words of Jesus Christ at the Last Supper-'This is my body' and 'This is my blood'-are to be understood literally, signifying the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist [Matthew 26:26-28, Mark 14:22-24, Luke 22:19-20, and 1 Corinthians 11:23-26; Council of Trent (Session 13, Chapter 4, Canons 1-4); The Catechism (CCC 1413)].
If someone chooses not to believe these teachings, they are free to make that choice, as God grants each person free will. However, deliberately rejecting the Church’s teachings places oneself outside the full communion of the Catholic Church and its faith. The truth of these teachings does not depend on individual belief. The doctrines of the Church remain true regardless of personal acceptance, and the Church's teachings stand as they are.
If you're a Catholic and have observed an exorcism you can definitely see that when the priest put the consecrated host to the victim, the demon would cry out in pain and terror. It's Jesus Christ himself casting him out.
@@sunnyjohnson992 You need to verify the Catholic Church’s ‘Imprimatur’ on that thing you’re reading. That which you claim here to have read there is in direct conflict with Church teaching and the words in the Holy Scriptures.
Jeniffer Aniston?!
For those who want to offer their talents the very best way is to join the Legion of Mary🙏
This is Our Lady’s army set up in 1921 and now on every continent with millions of members.
Please join and let’s set the world alight🙏
Legion of Mary, Army of the Immaculate Heart... We pray this prayer every day, I pray it multiple times a day... O MARY, WITHOUT SIN, CONCEIVED, PRAY FOR US WHO INFLUENCE YOU AND FOR ALL THOSE WHO DO NOT INFLUENCE YOU, ESPECIALLY FOR THE ENEMIES OF THE HOLY CHURCH AND FOR ALL THOSE WHO ARE RECOMMENDED TO YOU. QUEEN OF PEACE PRAY FOR US! 🙏❤️🇭🇷
If you’re taking the literal blood of Christ I’m pretty sure you’re going against OT law which prohibits the drinking of blood, and he followed that to the letter, also, if he truly did want his blood drank why not cut himself? Why hold up wine? Same for flesh, if he really meant it literally wouldn’t he have just given them blood and flesh?
Didn t He say in John 6:51 'I am the Living Bread that came down from heaven... and the bread I will give is my flesh. He promised, 'the bread I WILL GIVE is my flesh'. Jesus always keeps His promise. At the Last Supper He blessed bread and said, 'eat this IS MY FLESH'. in verse 63 'it is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken are spirit and life. Our flesh, our fallen human carnal nature will only perceive mangled body parts and dripping blood. The Spirit of God will help you with the truth of Jesus giving us Himself in the bread which He turned into His flesh thus LIVING Bread. 'the words I have spoken are Spirit and life' v63. 'The Spirit is the One that testifies and the Spirit is truth'
1John 5:6. Jesus was speaking the truth not figuratively
@@AHeyer13 Jesus also said to cut-off that part of your body that causes you to sin....how are you still able to actually type silly comments on a keyboard???
@@AHeyer13 he also said an lot of other things such as “I am the door” the vine, etc. was he any of those things? No the disciples understood what he was illustrating, there isn’t anything wrong with Christ speaking figuratively. Secondly when he said the bread he will give is his flesh he was referring to his sacrifice on the cross.! And in the last supper if we go by your understanding he’d have given his actual flesh, if he meant his flesh why would he hold up bread? He was obviously trying to illustrate something to the disciples, so that they would link the last supper to the crucifixion, Christ explains a lot of things in parables too to allow the biblical message to be easily understood.
@@zoelong6021 silly comments lol! When Jesus said to cut off that part of the body which causes you to sin He was talking in hyperbole. He did NOT say 'UNLESS you cut off that body part which is causing you to sin you will be lost'
But He did say UNLESS you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink His blood you will not have life in you. He made a CONDITION! UNLESS you eat...you WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU. definitely not a condition to disregard.
He said IF a body part causes you to sin cut it off. Better to enter Heaven with one eye than to lose your whole body in gehenna, which means get rid of anything that causes you to sin.
Of course this can be taken literally too! I know many people who developed cancer in some part of their body and were glad to have that body part removed just to gain a few more years on earth. Now if you knew FOR SURE a body part was going to land you in hell wouldn't you get rid of that part? Fact is, fortunately if anything is causing us to sin we can always eliminate it from our lives without having to resort to removing any body parts.
To conclude that because of the hyperbole in Matthew 5:29 then the whole Bread of Life Discourse in John 6 was merely symbolic is the without doubt silly eisigesis.
@@spdomingoo No! taking the actual body and blood of Jesus is not going against the OT. In Leviticus 17 we read that blood of 'any creature' could not be ingested. Now we know Jesus is not just 'any creature' whose blood could not wash out sins is He? The blood of Jesus, true God, true man in His Divinity was enough to wash away the sins of the world with His once for all time sacrifice. He stands apart from any creature. The Jews found it a hard teaching because they had not yet accepted He was truly the Son of God. Had they known even they would have understood that the blood of the God man had nothing to do with any other mortal's blood.
If Jesus Christ was a sinless Jew who fulfilled the Law of Moses, then he most likely never instructed his disciples to eat his body and drink his blood.
Jews DO NOT eat human flesh and drink human blood.
Why would Jesus tell his followers, even thinking about adultery is a sin, and then tell them it is okay to eat human flesh and to drink human blood?
It makes no sense.
The pagans tried to sneak and smuggle their own rituals into Messianic Judaism.
It is so obvious.
Read John chapter 6.
That's why many Jewish disciples turned away after Jesus' gave this sermon - they were obsessed in the physical and literal sense with what they consume is what causes evil and could not accept that they would physically need to eat His flesh and drink His blood.
Then we have the Catholics that believe they physically need to eat and drink flesh and blood.
Only when you consider that Judaism and Catholics are the same in that they profess salvation to be rooted in ancestry, rules and traditions can you then realise that ONLY FAITH IN CHRIST is the only true salvation.
You are missing the fact that Jesus is GOD.
So it's not some random human who was somewhat Holy saying eat my body and you'll totally live.
No, this is GOD saying I am the new sacrificial lamb, calling back to the Jews who ate an unblemished lamb in Egypt shortly before they were freed from slavery.
So to do we eat this lamb of GOD who takes away our sins and frees us from the slavery to sin and death.
Remember "GOD is love, GOD is life" when we eat the bread that's been consecrated by a priest we participate in GODs life, death and resurrection.
But don't take my word for it, go look into what The Church actually teaches about the Eucharist. Start with The Catechism of the Catholic Church, and go from there.
Symbolism? If so,Church wouldn't have existed after Apostles' death and her author would have been a liar! Not so?
Have a look around ST Augustines time ...a real symbol ...as the body is a symbol of the person / soul.
Did not Jesus say to Peter what ever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Peter was the first pope
Peace be with you.
Yes I agree the command of the Father and the teaching of Jesus are disobey by the people.
LIke Jesus said: Joh 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
Now who is the only true God? The Trinity.
Trinity is not the teaching of Jesus and the apostles. That is not also the word of God.
Matthew 6:24 KJV Bible - Follow God. Not man.
“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”
Yes protestant heretic stop following your lord & Master the excommunicated heretic martin luther & the false satanic man made protestant religion & false gospel.
Christ started & gave the Catholic church to the world.
We follow Jesus via the Catholic Apostles.
You follow false apostate protestant profits through martin luther.
Heretic with your false man made doctrines ( bible only from luther ).
Has anyone looked at it under a microscope. If it is actual blood there will be corpuscles in abundance.
Yes they have- check out Eucharistic miracles around the world. Exhibit created by Carlos Acutis
That does not reflect the belief ...the dimensions of bread remain. The bread is not meat/bone etc
Cursed is he that hangs on a tree. Jesus was referring to his physical sacrifice, and the new priesthood and covenent. He is the true high priest after the order of Melchizedek. He alone is our high priest of our confession and bishop of our souls.
The quote by Pope John Paul II ( The Church draws Her life from the Eucharist ) is a very troubling statement. The life of the Church should be in the one time sacrifice and resurrection of Jesus Christ who is seated at the right hand of God. Not in a man made wafer that has no mouth, no eyes, no ears and no body. John 4:24 says God is a spirit and they that worship Him, must worship Him in spirit and in truth. Not in a piece of bread. When Jesus offered up the bread and wine at the last supper, 100 % of His body and blood were sitting right in front of his disciples. The bread and wine were symbols of His body and blood that were to be offered very soon. Mathew 26:29 is Chrystal clear that He was not talking about literal blood when He says 29 But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this FRUIT OF THE VINE until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom. The problem I have is that the RCC seems to put more emphasis on worshipping a man made piece of bread than they do the actual risen living Almighty Son of God. One question I have to ask. Is your faith for your salvation in the man made wafer of the Catholic Church or is your faith for your salvation in the actual living Son of God, who died, rose and is seated at the right hand of God Almighty.
For Puritan Protestants, it's a memorial, a remembrance.
@@mr.angelosonassis3069 Anglicans too.
Nevertheless, since Jesus instituted transubstantiation the Eucharist is true.
God's great gift, ... protested and denied by Protestants.
@@Videx19 Some Anglicans.
Jesus was ALIVE when he instituted the Memorial of his impending death. The wine and bread symbolised his blood and body.
Besides, only those in a chosen Covenant relationship with Jesus could partake. And that too at each anniversary of Jesus' death.
Jesus' literal blood and body have been disposed of. Never to be used again.
That Jesus was alive when He instituted the memorial of his impending death does not contradict the fact that some disciples left Jesus because He asked them to (literally) eat His body and drink His blood (John 6:66). They thought Jesus was advocating cannibalism. And Jesus didn't correct them for thinking that way. Now, Jesus not going after the disciples to clarify His words about eating His flesh is significant. And this is why I stay in the bosom of holy mother Church. And I hope the same for others.
@@eric.loves.to.fish1 : Some disciples left because they misunderstood Jesus' words.
So logically, Jesus wasn't talking about literally eating his flesh and drinking his blood.
What flesh and blood had Jesus after he died?
The correct sense was Jesus saying:
Matthew 26:26 As they continued eating, Jesus took a loaf, and after saying a blessing, he broke it, and giving it to the disciples, he said: “Take, eat. THIS MEANS MY BODY.” 27 And taking a cup, he offered thanks and gave it to them, saying: “Drink out of it, all of you, 28 for THIS MEANS MY 'BLOOD of the covenant,’ which IS TO BE POURED OUT in behalf of many for forgiveness of sins.
If Jesus said, 'This IS my blood" why would he say that he was going to pour it out later?
Only those in the New Covenant are eligible to partake of these emblems ONCE a year at the anniversary of Jesus' death.
There are only a few still remaining of these chosen ones. They can be found amongst JWs. Compare Matthew 24:31.
No need for him to explain it to the protestants. We're the only ones who have it right!
Vatican II has been a confusing disaster.
Since Jose DH has invited others especially, Protestants to watch his video about his church's Bishop Barron, Jose DH should also watch other Protestant views about the Holy Communion.
we already know they mostly say it is a symbol.
@@fre7717 If that's the case, he is free to watch and engage them in a debate ! He should watch their TH-cam videos to present his views !
@@LeonLKCNo point in debating Truth deniers who disobey Jesus’ teachings!
If no point in debating with them, then it is no point for Jose DH in inviting other Christians to watch and hear what your Bishop's sermon about your communion as well, right?
@@LeonLKCprotestants worry about Catholics , Catholics don't worry about Protestants, why? Because their conscience troubles them
I'm a Protestant, and I totally disagree with RCC interpretation of the Scriptures. If it looks like bread, taste like bread, it is bread. You can scientifically prove it never becomes blood or flesh. Cheers 🍻
Your faith is questionable because your words do not align with the instruction and or command(s) of Jesus Christ. Enjoy your bread and drink. I am taking mine in communion with Jesus Christ.
Research the scriptures. Jesus let many walk away because they saw what He said and what it meant. He did not back-peddle. He stood fast and kept only the 12.
Pray hard and learn in the presence if the Holy Spirit and hold your man-teachers at bay while you do your deeper dive into belief and communion with Christ. It’s not what men think bread and wine are, it’s what Christ told us it is. ❤🙏🏼
@MrDoyle07 My faith is genuine, and my words may not align with the teachings of Rome.
I do enjoy bread and wine, and I don't pretend it's something else.
You may as well eat pizza and drink beer and tell everyone that's ice cream and Coke. What's real is real, and what's imagination is not.
I take my communication seriously and respectfully, but not literally. Jesus is not a literal door, hinges, shepherd, way, lion, lamb, or bread. Obviously, we disagree on interpretation. Please prove me wrong.
Please educate me where in the scriptures Jesus literally cut his literal body and pour his literal blood, and gave it to eat and drink.
You rely on man-teaching as much as I do, no matter how much you deny it.
Cheers 🍻
@@nightowl7066Jesus said it and His physical reality is entirely different than ours. His miracles defied our perceptions too. Shall we dismiss those too?
@MrDoyle07 this doesn't prove anything. Jesus knows our physical reality and His own. If he wants to communicate with us, he knows what we're capable of understanding.
😅 It's the flesh and blood of God, not just flesh and blood. God is who he is, and his Word creates our world. It's the Word of Christ, and I believe Jesuschrist is Lord.
Where is the cup? Jesus said. “Take and drink”……and the Latin church has cancelled the cup for the faithful
I hold that cup every single Sunday at my Catholic Church, and I drink from it in sovereign reverence for Jesus Christ.
I go to the churches that offer wine not the ones that don’t. As a Catholic, who can go to any mass around the world.
The Latin Church is the Catholic Church . The seat of Peter is in that. Church. The Eucharist on it’s own is the complete body , blood , soul and divinity of Christ. The blood which He said: Drink of it all of you for this is my blood of the covenant ….is also the completeness of Jesus.
The consacrated Eucharist and the consacrated wine are both Christ completely. This was stipulated at the Council of Trent.
@@doremimusichonolulu6854yes that is fine, but if you have either the eucharist or the wine you are just fine.
The cup was for the Covenant. The cup alone is still all of Christ and the bread is all of Christ.
The RCC doesn’t offer the cup to the congregation. The Episcopal Church does. Big difference.
Flesh or blood naturally contains blood & most Catholic parishes have offered the cup in recent decades
@@geoffjs That’s why I left the RCC. Always a nebulous answer for everything that’s questioned. At least the Episcopal Church is more soundly grounded in Scripture. No church is perfect being managed by imperfect men.
The "Epicopal" has nothing but bread and wine
@@richardounjian9270 Nothing special about the Roman church that burned people alive for not conforming.
The episcopal church is based on a king that wanted a divorce and beheaded 2 wives. He killed many innocent people, but Henry's church is pretty. The eucharist contains both body and blood fully in both bread and wine.
Jesus spoke to the Jews in John 6. Teaching them about salvatioin through faith. Not worshipping a wafer or chalice. Jesus sits at the right hand of the Father.
So it’s not symbolic cannibalism, it’s actual cannibalism? Yuck!!
You raise a very good point ....but it is not cannibalism ...it is consuming a sacrament designed to be eaten...the presence is believed to be real ..under the appearance of bread.
“Every Protestant should watch this video”. This is just click bait, because JD and Bishop Baron use only subjective opinions, plus no Christians charity is shown by these two.
They didnt worship the Eucharist in the bible
crawl back into the swamp tim
And your point is? OT Jesus hadn’t been born yet, but it had foretelling of Eucharist.
@@Teralw195 Only in the mind of a Catholic...but NOT in the practice of the NT Church which began at Pentecost
@@bibleman8010 Is such insulting communication really appropriate?
@@TimSpangler-rd6vs when it comes to a troll like you it isnt insulting its truth
Is the celebration of mass and eucharist for the forgiveness of sins? So like, a replacement of yom kippur? We no longer have to be Jewish and attend yom kippur with a Jewish high priest in Jerusalem temple and slaughter lambs for the forgiveness of sins. We get the best sacrifice/worship in any mass any place on the planet? It's now made available to every nation, tribe and tongue?
If someone rejects the mass, are they not also rejecting the forgiveness that it provides? Matthew 26:27-28 NRSV-CI [27] Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you; [28] for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins."
Drink from this cup of my blood for the forgiveness of sins! Plus John 6 commands that directly link eating His Flesh and drinking His Blood to eternal life!
In the Old Covenant Jews would have to bring an animal for sacrifice to the temple priest to shed blood and cover sins. In the New Covenant Jesus is the priest and offering by combining his self as the pascal lamb and the bread and wine of the Melchizedechian order at the Christian altar. So how do we participate in that cup of the blood of the New Covenant ? How do we get it applied to us to cover sin? Just believe thinking about it in our minds? Or John 6 and Last Supper commands?
1 Corinthians 11 :20-34
When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.
For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken.
What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? what shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not.
For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:
After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.
Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another.
And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.
The Sacrifice of God is past, present and future! It is eternal because it is outside of space and time. The sacrifice by Christ dying and suffering was done in space and time 2000 years ago, when Christ (God) chose to became man (incarnate), this is when He went inside space and time. The holy sacrifice of the Mass is a "sacrifice" being presented to us again on a daily basis, and this sacrifice is outside space and time in a mystical and spiritual way because God is not limited in space and time, EVERYTHING TO HIM is an eternal event, and this is the only sacrifice pleasing to God The Father.
Why do you think St. Paul was instructing the Corinthians about The Eucharist if it is not an eternal sacrifice or just a mere "symbol".
(1 Corinthians 11:27), Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.
- And this was after Christ's Ascension.
@@bibleman8010 I don't think it's symbolic
@@bibleman8010 how do we apply the New Covenant? How do we get "covered" atoned under His blood?
@@macbride33 Him God hath proposed as a propitiator, through faith in His blood (Rom., iii, 25), for our sins, and not for our sins only, but also for those of the whole world (I John, ii, 2).proclaimed in the words of the Nicene Creed, “who for us men and for our salvation, came down, took flesh, was made man; and suffered.” And all that is thus taught in the decrees of the councils may be read in the pages of the New Testament
@@bibleman8010 so just by saying I believe in it? ?
Yes jesus said remembrance, not reinactment, christ died once on the cross, gave his life as a ransom for sin, the sacrifice was finished on the cross, the eucharist is blasphemy , it is an insult to the work of christ jesus on the cross , the scriptures the catholic church use for the eucharist is taken completely out of context, the wrath of God against sin was satisfied on the cross with jesus sacrifice, nothing to be added, it's a finished work, redemption was secured by jesus on the cross, full payment for sin , see it's all about jesus nothing to do with us, our salvation is in jesus christ alone, salvation is in a person not in a religion, not in a bunch of works that we should do, this bishop barron is preaching this and will tell Catholics the importance of the eucharist, yet protestants are wrong because they believe that christ paid full price on the cross, and yet when he was interviewed by Ben shapiro he said that people like Ben shapiro could be saved in an indirect way, and an atheist with a conscience could be saved, what hypocrisy, they are full of rubbish, only way to be saved is in christ alone for salvation, trusting in jesus work on the cross, complete redemption, 100% of God, no human effort, salvation is a work of God , nothing to do with mankind, is totally by grace which is undeserved favour,
The Apostle Paul wrote the word 'anamnesis' and not 'thusia' in his Epistle to the Gentiles of Corinth. It is a proclamation of the Lord's suffering and death till He comes, and we do this in an act of remembrance of Him. Whoever do this will be bless by God. In fact my church practices regularly the breaking of bread and drinking of the cup.
Gary you missed the part where Jesus said “DO THIS in remembrance of me”. It is clearly a command to continue this act into to the future.
You misunderstand what Catholics believe. We do not re-crucify Jesus, we actually join Him at the ONE crucifixion. At every Mass every Christian is united with all the angels worshipping His once for all work on the cross. We believe it is a complete act of Grace to receive His salvation. But* we are given our free will and consequently our free action to respond to His grace and join Him, to do His works, to complete His kingdom...when we respond to the Holy Spirit with our obedience, our study of His Word, our spiritual and corporal works of mercy- we are participating with Christ in our salvation and perfection. We understand the movement is ALL His and without Him none of our works mean anything but He still wants us to move. Just like a parent waits for the child to stand up to pick them up and carry them- it is the effort that counts. Or a parent waits for the child to calm their tempestous emotions then they scoop them up and sooth them with the words they need...or when the parent rewards a child after they've been obedient in all that was asked...by ourselves we accomplish nothing but with Christ we can and are expected to make an effort. So no we are not doing a sacrifice- we are joining the ONE sacrifice. And yes we mean that literally. Just like we cannot detect a change in bread and wine, we still seem to be sitting comfortably in our church building but really we are at the foot of the cross receiving Him and it is our obligation to obey and participate, and also to remind ourselves constantly of that fact. Every protestant DOES things, even if it's the meagerest prayer. What kind of Christian would someone be if they didn't even do that? If they don't celebrate Eucharist? Or read the Bible ever? Or if they never change one dang thing about their sinful life? They never do any charity? They never share the Gospel even once? What kind of "Christian " is that? Would you ever call them one? Just having some glimmer of belief deep down in your brain does not make one a Christian- except in the most extreme cases of ignorance or death when our dear Lord may have pity on the man who receives the spark of faith at his dying breath. That's definitely possible. But is that how we are asked to live? No, we are to actively pursue Christ in our life. Just as a physical pursuit requires DOING things like putting one foot in front of the other to go to the Lover. You obviously feel a deep need to DO things for Christ since you constantly are responding in thr chats of these kinds of videos...I've seen you. Well it's because you know you have an obligation to respond, to DO! Now instead of stewing in hate criticizing Christian practices you don't fully understand, why don't you use your time to do the actual research and learn what they do mean? And then respond to the tugging in your heart that is obviously there since you feel so strongly about Catholics. Christ is beckoning you to go deeper!
Remembrance not reinactment. It's like married couple remembering their wedding day, they dont get married again and again, 1 Corinthians 11, 26, For as often as you eat this bread drink the cup , you proclaim the lords death until he comes, christ used the bread and wine as symbolic of His body and blood which he would sacrifice,
Wrong because the catholic church believe the mass is a sacrifice for the sins of the people, which is contrary to scripture which says one sacrifice for all time , hebrews 10, 12, but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God,
Bishop Barron wrote in one of his books, that only Catholics have the Eucharist. Which is not what his ecclesial community teaches. So why would I listen to him if he can't get that right?
Can those who are not in the succession of the Fathers consecrate the bread and wine? When a Baptist Preacher tells us “this is not anything but a symbol” he is telling the truth. He has no authority from the succession beginning with Christ through the Apostles to consecrate the host or the wine. I always said/thought. “Then why are you doing it”? A symbol means nothing. The truth is, the only “symbol” in our Church that is the real presence is, as Christ spoke it would be, is the Eucharist and the Blood. The rest of the “symbols”, such as statues and pictures, are just that, they are placemarkers.
@MrDoyle07 Your own ecclesial community teaches that the Orthodox, the Copts, the Old Catholics, the PNCC and possibly others, maintain apostolic succession and valid sacraments. When a Catholic person, even a bishop, says otherwise, they're going against Catholic teaching.
@danielobrien189 yes the Catholic church teaches that they have apostolic succession it is a real sacrament. Western Catholics have permission to take communion at Orthodox churches. We largely don't because we respect that the Orthodox do not want us to and have asked us to abstain. So from a western catholic perspective I am not sinning going to those services or anything.. so I don't understand what you're upset about. You are mistaken that we say they aren't apostolic. There are different issues in all these churches that I won't go into but that isnt one.
@@danielobrien189 Barron is not denying that those with valid apostolic succession have valid sacraments.
@Vigula He certainly shouldn't. He knows better. But when he says that only Catholics have the Eucharist, that's what he's saying. Why do you think he says that?
It is the body and blood of your jesus painted on the wall who was a criminal chosen by davince to be his model for your jesus
What are you rambling on about? Pictures, depictions of Christ are not Christ so whether or not any particular person involved in making an image is a sinner (as we all are) is irrelevant. No one cares who the model was. It's the content of the image, what it is trying to convey that matters. Some art does this better than others. I won't argue the relative merits of various artistic movements. Pick one that inspires devotion and brings you closer to the Lord. Maybe icons, maybe the Renaissance paintings, maybe (Lord help us) 20th century works😅
@@j.h.9376 you said the image has content, what is the content of the image in accordance to the words of God? What does the image convey to you? How does the image made you closer to God? Or maybe to demons? What did God said to the images?
@@reylambarte5615 I'm sorry your English is confusing- what are you asking? What is your issue? Christians do not have an issue with depictions. It is not idolatrous since we do not worship images- we can make an icon, an image of Christ since He was Himself the living icon of God and God at once. But no matter what the image we know that the image or statue isn't Christ Himself, it's an inanimate object. We can kiss His image as you would a picture of your beloved, but you know it isn't them in the flesh. Catholics don't think their images ARE alive or are Christ. I don't understand what the issue is. Even an image that is truly His face, like the shroud of Turin or Veronica's veil , isn't worshipped as if it contains Christ in anyway. It is revered as a very special icon especially as they touched our Lord and He chose to leave His face for us to meditate on, but they aren't Him. They are objects. All images, statues, relics etc are reminders to draw us to love and meditation but aren't in themselves containing Christ or His saints. So why would it matter if someone models it wrong? Why would I care if the model was a sinner- he most assuredly was and so was the artist. As for content I was speaking generally. Whatever image is being portrayed is the content. If it is Jesus you think about Jesus, if Peter or Paul you might think about them and thei life. So you are using the image to meditate on an aspect of the Faith either Christ Himself or history or people and their contributions to thr faith, their strengths we venerate. Venerate is to remember and respect their memory and how they continue to intercede for us.... it is not worshipping them as deity. Of course relics or images of Christ are images of the One we worship, God the son. But they are not Him Himself so we aren't being idolatrous just for holding it or kissing it or anything cuz its an act of devotion not required and also we fully realize its just an image...Again we can either like that style or not like it. Find one you do like if Da Vinci is not what you like. The paintings in the Vatican aren't doctrine, you don't have to like them. There is art there I absolutely DO NOT like. But the church having it doesn't mean I have to like it. It's what it is showing you're supposed to think about, not fixated on the ascetics. But again find some you like.
@@j.h.9376 you are funny, so your church teaching, that it is alright to use inanimate object as a tool to meditate or pray or to show your love by kissing the object that represent your god? I tried to look for any verse that will justify your teaching and i found nothing instead exodus 32 wherein israel made a golden calf to represent ther god and were punished to death. So if i accept your reason as true then God was unjust when He punished them to die.
About praying to the saints for intercession is sinful because all of them are still dead including mary and in the bible this sinful act is called necromancy. God has given only one intercessor and that is Jesus who is alive and in the right hand of the Father.
Ther is no need to use objects or tools as help in meditating or praying to Him because He is God. What you and your church doing are idolatry
@reylambarte5615 well two millenia of Christians disagree with you. There's way too much wrong wirh what you wrote to get into different arguments but I'll pray that you stop attacking God's Bride and learn the Truth.
Regeneration precedes Faith. The imputation of the active obedience of Christ,by Faith alone ,in Christ alone is denied by the “ works “ based cult of the Roman Catholic Church ( Council of Trent for reference)Vicar of Christ,immaculate conception of Mary,purgatory are all un biblical. The covenant of Grace needs to be understood, against the broken covenant of Works,but denying the imputation of the active obedience of Christ by faith alone in Christ alone is proof of a heretical Church and a false Gospel.
Funny you talk about unbiblical then repeat faith alone which is never mentioned.
@@Ajas0810 ..I’ll start off with, blessed are those whose transgressions are forgiven,whose sins are covered.Blessed is the one whose sin the Lord will never count against them.
@@chrismachin2166 why do you try to say Catholics are unbiblical but then share an unbiblical doctrine?
@@Ajas0810 who is the “Blessed man “in Romans chapter 4?
If faith alone is salvation, then why on first Corinthians 13:13 it clearly says Love is greater than faith! By the way, The Bible is a Catholic book even if a protestant without apostolic authority takes six books from it like Lutheran did. Still is a Catholic book. The Catholic church is the only christian church that can defent her self with the Bible alone. You brother have an incomplete christian faith. That's a fact not my opinión.
Cults; islam, catholics, orthodox, SDA, mormons, Judaism, jw’s, hindus, buddhist, etc.etc.
Cannibalism. A game the whole family play.
It’s His SPIRITUAL BODY AND BLOOD. Although remaining Physical in appearance. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE For GOD.
Don’t be ignorant. Educate yourself bro.
Amen