Ever considered being a lecturer? You’re much better orator & a teacher than my Civil Lit tutors for my BPTC! This was very well organised using simple language, thank you!
Thank you :) It's this sort of encouragement that keeps me going, it really does. I would love to lecture, one day, as staring at myself in a camera in a coffee shop can feel a bit strange sometimes! ;)
@@RedwoodLegal What happens if a claimant increases the value of their claim before they make a part 36 offer? Would that justify making an offer at a later stage.
Hi Alex, its fabtasctic people like you who make me want to study law. Incidentally, i have in my posession your 2020 edition, Flying Solo. Introduction - Life in the skies... perfectly brilliant!
Excellent video, clear and concise whilst also being balanced. I loaned £100k with 20k facility fee - the conveyancer who mediated and received funds between us and respondent made significant mistakes and being SRA regulated their insurers have been placed on notice. Your math was spot on, presentation professional and we wish you well for this investment in demonstrating the prowess of yourselves. Thank you
CPR PART36 is designed to encourage each side to settle for less than their claim (to avoid lengthy costly litigation). PART36 only applies to fast track and multi-track (not small claims track) If C offers D under part36 then If C wins at trial (D loses) Then C wins normal amount +D pays an extra penalty (for not settling early when they had chance) If C loses at trial (D wins) then D wins normal amount
What about costs claims under section 52 of the Courts Act 1971 when a case is withdrawn? And the previous defendant then becomes the applicant in the subsequent costs action Also can an offer be a “section 36 offer” if it is not explicitly named as such and has a 14 day expiry date rather than a 21 day expiry date?
So in effect, where C wins at trial: C successful with their p36= massive fees for them D successful with their p36= massive savings on fees payable to C So there’s isn’t really a situation where C would have to pay D’s cost in the above unless D won at court?
Perhaps not massive but substantial enough to make a difference. Defendant Part 36 offers cane even more substantial. I go into the topic in more detail in my new book, "Flying Solo": www.lulu.com/en/gb/shop/alex-woods-and-nate-fakes-and-kinga-stabryla-and-kinga-stabryla/flying-solo/paperback/product-m5yqjq.html?page=1&pageSize=4
I claimed for £5000 and last week I received a DQ form from my defendant and he mentioned mediation service. Please , Can you tell me is it sign of positive?
Yes, it's positive because they are open to trying to resolve the issue. During mediation, you can put your point of view and they can put theirs, so at least you understand each other. You probably won't agree with them, but you have information about how they will try to argue their case.
@@borhanuddin3779 DQ means Directions Questionnaire. If this is not a questionnaire that you have completed, then it is one that has been filed (sent to the court) by the other party in the case. You should have received a questionnaire to complete yourself and should be sent a copy of the one that has been filed by the other party so you can see what they think. Have a look at the DQ by searching the Internet for Court Form N180.
I have been disputing a bill from my solicitors firm and pointing out there mistakes they made which cost me substantial amount of money, they issued court proceedings and made ‘ not part 36 offer’ I need some advice on that.
Ever considered being a lecturer? You’re much better orator & a teacher than my Civil Lit tutors for my BPTC!
This was very well organised using simple language, thank you!
Thank you :) It's this sort of encouragement that keeps me going, it really does. I would love to lecture, one day, as staring at myself in a camera in a coffee shop can feel a bit strange sometimes! ;)
Instablaster
Well explained in layman's terms and also useful for my civil litigation exam on Tuesday! Thank You.
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much. Those examples helped massively.
Earned a new subscriber.
That's explained it much better then my Solicitor did. Thany you.
Glad to be of assistance :) Thanks, RL Team
Learned more From this chap in 3 videos than I have in 3 years with everyone else I see dropping information bombs All over the place
Phenomenally concise and clear explanation. Thank you so much!
You are very welcome. :)
@@RedwoodLegal What happens if a claimant increases the value of their claim before they make a part 36 offer? Would that justify making an offer at a later stage.
Hi Alex, its fabtasctic people like you who make me want to study law. Incidentally, i have in my posession your 2020 edition, Flying Solo. Introduction - Life in the skies... perfectly brilliant!
Excellent video, clear and concise whilst also being balanced.
I loaned £100k with 20k facility fee - the conveyancer who mediated and received funds between us and respondent made significant mistakes and being SRA regulated their insurers have been placed on notice.
Your math was spot on, presentation professional and we wish you well for this investment in demonstrating the prowess of yourselves. Thank you
Thanks for sharing!
CPR PART36 is designed to encourage each side to settle for less than their claim (to avoid lengthy costly litigation).
PART36 only applies to fast track and multi-track (not small claims track)
If C offers D under part36 then
If C wins at trial (D loses) Then C wins normal amount +D pays an extra penalty (for not settling early when they had chance)
If C loses at trial (D wins) then D wins normal amount
I thought I was meant to be the expert! I have a contender...
You have made my day.
You're welcome!
Great explanation. Thx :)
great video
Very useful and informative :)
Glad it was helpful!
much appreciated!
This man excellent 👌
Thank you kindly!
Minute 2:20 still nothing about part36 other than spilling cereals once you see p36.
Thanks for your time
It is a nearly 20 minute video and I like to talk with my viewers too.
What about costs claims under section 52 of the Courts Act 1971 when a case is withdrawn? And the previous defendant then becomes the applicant in the subsequent costs action
Also can an offer be a “section 36 offer” if it is not explicitly named as such and has a 14 day expiry date rather than a 21 day expiry date?
informative video thanks :)
Glad it was helpful!
So in effect, where C wins at trial:
C successful with their p36= massive fees for them
D successful with their p36= massive savings on fees payable to C
So there’s isn’t really a situation where C would have to pay D’s cost in the above unless D won at court?
Perhaps not massive but substantial enough to make a difference. Defendant Part 36 offers cane even more substantial. I go into the topic in more detail in my new book, "Flying Solo":
www.lulu.com/en/gb/shop/alex-woods-and-nate-fakes-and-kinga-stabryla-and-kinga-stabryla/flying-solo/paperback/product-m5yqjq.html?page=1&pageSize=4
@@RedwoodLegal much appreciated for the reply !
I claimed for £5000 and last week I received a DQ form from my defendant and he mentioned mediation service. Please , Can you tell me is it sign of positive?
Yes, it's positive because they are open to trying to resolve the issue. During mediation, you can put your point of view and they can put theirs, so at least you understand each other. You probably won't agree with them, but you have information about how they will try to argue their case.
@@tlangdon12 Thank you so much 🙏🏻.
Now it says DQ filed on 14/02/2024.
What does it mean?
@@borhanuddin3779 DQ means Directions Questionnaire. If this is not a questionnaire that you have completed, then it is one that has been filed (sent to the court) by the other party in the case. You should have received a questionnaire to complete yourself and should be sent a copy of the one that has been filed by the other party so you can see what they think. Have a look at the DQ by searching the Internet for Court Form N180.
I have been disputing a bill from my solicitors firm and pointing out there mistakes they made which cost me substantial amount of money, they issued court proceedings and made ‘ not part 36 offer’ I need some advice on that.
By all means - you can email us on info@redwoodlegal.co.uk
Some segments in the video are stamped not adjacent to each other
Thanks for letting us know.
Isn’t it up to 10?%? On top of the base rate I mean...
If you mean the amount of a no win no fee success fee - no. It is up to 100% of base rate. Not quite clear on your question, though.
Confusing
It is not the easiest thing to wrap your head around. It's probably better explained in the "Flying Solo: How to Represent Yourself in Court" book.
Thanks sexy
I’m not to sure weather to take my part 36 offer .. it’s through the MiB .. I’ve got till 19th