$249 vs $59 Variable ND Filter Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- $249 vs $59 Variable ND Filter Comparison
I've been using the Variable ND filter from JJC for the entire length of my career and was really eager to see how it performed against PolarPro Peter McKinnon variable ND.
This is just my personal opinion and experience and i hope you'll find the video useful.
JJC VARIABLE ND: geni.us/a6KXKD
POLARPRO VARIABLE ND: geni.us/QAAlWyZ
Hope you'll enjoy!
MY LUTS: www.plindgren....
MY INSTAGRAM: / peterlindgren1
MY TIK TOK: / peterlindgren1
THE PODCAST: peterandtom.buz...
MY ESSENTIALS
TUBEBUDDY: geni.us/gettub...
THE CALL OUTS I USE: geni.us/mhud3
BEST FCPX PLUGINS: geni.us/bestpl...
COLOR FINALE: geni.us/colorf...
CINEMA GRADE: geni.us/cinema...
BEST SFX LIBRARY: geni.us/awesom...
2 MONTHS OF FREE MUSIC: geni.us/bestmusic
JOIN ME ON INSTAGRAM: / peterlindgren1
MY LUTS: www.plindgren....
MAIN GEAR
SONY A7SIII: geni.us/theson...
SLIDER 10% OFF: rhino.camera/P...
LENS: geni.us/mymain...
RGB TUBE LIGHTS: geni.us/nanlit...
KEY LIGHT: geni.us/forza300
RGB PANEL LIGHT: geni.us/nanlit...
SD CARDS: geni.us/sdcard...
DRONE: geni.us/mavica...
GIMBAL: geni.us/dji-rs...
MICROPHONE: geni.us/sonysh...
B ROLL LENS: geni.us/sony24gm
EDITING SSD: geni.us/editin...
DESK GEAR
MY MONITOR: geni.us/ultraw...
NAS: geni.us/asustor10
NAS DISKS: geni.us/nasdisks
KEYBOARD: geni.us/mxkeys...
MOUSE: geni.us/mxmast...
SPEAKERS: geni.us/z407
USB HUB: geni.us/brydge...
IPAD: geni.us/2020ip...
APPLE PEN: geni.us/applepen
IPAD STAND: geni.us/satech...
OTHER GEAR I USE
MY TELE ZOOM: geni.us/sigma1...
BATIS 40MM: geni.us/batis40mm
BATIS 85MM: geni.us/zeissb...
MY MOST VERSATILE LENS: geni.us/tamron...
www.plindgren.com
LINKS USED IN THE DESCRIPTION MAY OR MAY NOT BE AFFILIATE LINKS
By using the affiliate links i earn a small fee of your purchase, it does not cost you anything extra to use them. They help me to be able to create more videos for you. Thank you for the support!
JOIN THE PL ARMY:
/ @peterlindgren1
This video is not ment in ANY WAY to criticize Peter's work or skills. It is a product review like any other where I compare features between two products. This product just happen to have his name on it.
I love Peter and what he's doing and gladly support him in his endeavours.
Peter Lindgren you didn’t need to say this bro. That said there is no way that this product doesn’t have a markup on it so that he gets paid...
Hi Peter ! I really love your vids ! I have the same problem you encounter at the beginning of the video, with the black shadows around.. I use the Tamron 17-28mm at 2.8 with a good variable ND filter (brand Gobe). Any solution to avoid this problem ? Thanks for your help :-)
I think k&f is better
Peter please!! can i contact with you? i send a fwe mails on your mail!!!
Please do Kase filters Kit Sir !
Basically the extra $189 gets you a fancy box with a signature on.
LOL, pretty much. Which proves packaging is important.
It's time for a Mr. Beast filter. More subs, more filter 😄
Peter mckinnon is overrated
@@Samvisualarts No he's not. His delivery is consistent with his market. And don't make disparages without support.
Well, no it gets you better image quality and no X when you rotate the filter -which for professionals working outside in changing light conditions is pretty damn important...
Ever since Peter McKinnon released that I wanted to buy it and everybody was using and the footage looks incredible . Now after watching this I don't think I need it . It's way too much overpriced.
Peter Mckinnon is a big brand ambassador. He's a well-known Photographer/filmmaker everything he says get valued literally
Love to see a comparison, though you did not test the filters in enough use cases. Especially when used agains direct light, cheaper filters tend to show a significant drop in contrast as well as ghosting and flaring. Another factor - difficult to test though - is the durability of the coating and if it has certain properties like being antistatic. I'm personally using the B+W variable ND, which isn't cheap either but works great in nearly every scenario.
Disclaimer: There are just two ways of making a variable ND filter: stacking two polarized filters, so depending on the rotation angle against each other they cut out light. Second option is similiar to having an LC Display and decreasing the transparancy by applying voltage, as it is done internally in the Sony FX9. So with any mechanical variable ND you will get a polarizing function, as well as the cross effect close to the maximum angle. If you need more stops, there is no way of getting around of combing two polarizers with fixed ND values, like they did in the other PolarPro PM filter.
Still a decent test that shows that you can actually save a lot of money depending on your use case, thank you Peter :)
JJC was the first ND-filter I bought mainly because it was affordable. I have tested much more expensive filters since but always come to the conclusion that the JJC is the best. Peter recommended the JJC 1,5 years ago after I got it and I still agree with his opinion on this filter. Will buy another one for convenience so I don’t have to change everytime I change camera. I also had to raise the shutter speed on my second camera when doing a two camera interview because i sold the other way more expensive filters I had since they were not as good as the JJC. This test confirms my impression of the JJC!
Really like the colors in this clip itself. Beautiful color grading.
Yess!! Got all the guesses right! Such a detailed comparison on those two ND filters by the way!
I hate to say it, but i am using a 10 eur variable ND from China, works fine. Been meaning to buy a more expensive one, just to compare. So far I have been happy with the colors. Thanks for the video.
I said I was going to subscribe from my NEW videography channel & here I am. You are the first channel I subscribed to with the new one. All the best & thank you for ALL the amazing tips.
Finally seeing a real review of that PM filter ...everyone is only posiitive because it's a PM filter, no comparisons whatever. So good to see that that PM filter is quite overrated. Yeah it's better for correct colors, but not that good looking at its pricetag.
But you gotta admit the gold looks sweet :)
I just received a JJC filter to try out and quite honestly, for the price, it’s terrific. I usually have a Hoya filter on the front but to be honest, I think this might be better!
Thanks for the comparison.
I bought the PM one before seeing this. I may have bought the other one if I'd seen this beforehand, but I don't regret my purchase. I recognize the quality inherent in the PM one. I like that there's pure neutrality of color, and the filter is super tough. I use it almost as a lens protector because it's so resistant to everything. It's a very convenient filter that comes with a ton of convenient, premium items like the hard case, the extra lens cloth, lens cap and the soft case with the built-in lens cloth. Is that worth over $100 more? That's up to you. The PM filter has literally no problems that I or many other reviewers can find. Whatever it promises, it delivers on. The 2-400 is certainly more versatile, but has a few issues here and there. It's hard to justify the price on the PM one though with the alternative being so much cheaper. I love quality, and the PM one does all it promises to do. I'll probably not by the 6-9 though because of what I spent on the 2-5.
I was able to tell on all after the first one. The cheaper one just looked a bit worse - the colors were more dirty in the background blurs that made it quite easy to spot.
Like always, super helpful!! Have been planing to buy the Polarpro. Now I’m saving a lot of money 💰 thanks man! 🙌🏼
Great video. Love that you are showing this. I was think of buying new nd filter for my outdoors tent movies.
Looks like i have to look up jjc. Liked the warmth color Its give 👍
I have a Tiffen ND filter and the Peter McKinnon 2-5 Stop. The quality of the PM is good but when it's too bright, you should take the 6-9 stop ... sorry, it's too expensive 🤷♂️
The cross is cause you turn it beyond the stops that it can... the two fields of the filter overlap in the X pattern instead of an II pattern
After getting the first one wrong, I got them all correct. JJC had more contrast. I like it better than polar pro.
I would go with the JJC. I personally preferred the colour of it👍
Dude...PolarPro is the cleanest even if it is overpriced.. There is no comparison in this field. It's better to have a clean image without colourcast rather than having to "clean" it in post. I think the combo pack from PolarPro and Peter McKinnon is the one to go. And by the way I missed only one shot in the comparison (the third one). Keep up the good work.
Great comparison, possible to get a size bigger ND or a small thread lens and use step up rings. I wonder if that X will disappears.
i love my peter mckinnon filter - no crossing or vignetting, no color cast, even at 16mm.
It's a great filter! The vignetting is there at 16mm but you don't get the cross vignette though!
Thank you for doing this video! It absolutely helped me make a decision on which one to buy
My guess would be that you'd see a more noticeable difference in high-res photos, between the two filters. Video is relatively low res, but when you shoot for National Geographic (I don't!), every little helps. Great video!
I got all of them correct. I can see a slight blue tint to the PolarPro. I like the look of the JJC filter more.
I personally think people are overpaying just because of Peter McKinnon's name.... I would definitely go for JJC.... Thanks, Peter Lindgren
Oh man! I picked the JJC for the overall look for every shot. Your videos alrock man! Thank you!
Your reaction after dropping Peter's filter is priceless haha. Great video boss.
Here's my breakdown on the price of polar pro VND filter.
You pay $250 for :
$90 for the packaging,
$90 for the brass ring and
$70 for the vnd glass.. Lol
Got them all right! JJC has more warm colors and the Polar Pro feels like you raise the shadows somehow which I find pretty weird
I did notice that the Peter Mckinnon ND was more neutral. From the other reviews Ive seen it doesn't do the X pattern as bad. But when you are in a budget, like I am, i would go for the more price friendly ND 😁😁😁 Still this is a great video.
The JJC does a good job! But PM Polar Pro also is top notch. I'd recommend checking Moment ND filter. A bit cheaper that Peter's and has such a good quality.
Once you pointed out the blown out HLs on the polar... i couldnt un-see it. For that price point, yikes.
I was only wrong on the last one =)
I like the PolarPro more than the JJC, but of course it's kinda nice that you can make it so dark with the JJC.
Nice comparsion thanks!
I got the PM VERSION. Simply the best
SOLD! Just in the market for an ND filter and polariser. Cheers Peter!!
Thanks for the honest review man! 👍
Nice test. I love all your videos so much.
❤
I got 5 out of 5 right, only the third picture was a little hard to see, but saw right away that the Polar Pro was more blue in it.
And I agree with you, I also like the colors with JJC.
🤷♂️
By the way, got a huge shock when you were about to drop the expensive filter.
And then you end up doing it!
🤦♂️😂😂😂
Best regards from Denmark 😉
I'm only got it wrong in the first image. Because the left wall is kinda darker, I thought, "Oh, that must be a vignetting from JJC" but no, LOL. But all the others I knew, which is the McKinnon cause it looked way sharper.
The Peter version is the Beats headphones of filters, overpriced brand name and you’re paying mostly for the packaging. It’s an ND filter, no one cares about presentation.
@Maxim Rusu The presentation is a *bonus*. The results show the quality more, in my humble opinion. I think it's safe to say no one carries around the box it came in.
@Maxim Rusu You actually pay more for a box that you will throw away
I guess all of them right
I like the JJC way way better it’s warm and nice
I bought the Freewell 2-5, 6-9 set. Seems ok. 👍
It's important for anyone considering the JJC filter also acts as a polarizing filter and in the sample images that have reflective surfaces (windows) you can see the difference very easily. I don't shoot video that much, but can see where that would be desirable in a lot of work. For still photographers, it becomes a matter of whether you want to reduce reflections all of the time. Many photographers want to keep reflections for certain types of images, so a ND filter that does not include polarization would be preferable. In selecting filters (and reviewing them), it would be a good idea to discuss whether the filter keeps the color accurate or modifies it to some extent. Again, the importance of this will vary with the photographer.
Thanks for making the review.
I got 4 right! and I like the JJC most!
I liked JJC as well, man you saved me $200
Honest comparison.
JJC produces more chromatic aberration specially in 2:52 on the edge line of the house roofing.
I usually hate it specially filming establishing shot, the Polar Pro however will look good by just adjusting a bit of Aperture to compensate that extra exposure, I think Polar Pro gives more a neutral look without punching in artifacts.
JJC looks good considering the price, Polar Pro on the other hand is a toy for a bit of knowledgeable videographers that know what they are doing considering it only has a 5 stops of light vs. the 400 stops of JJC.
So they have pros and cons but for the price no one can argue about JJC its remarkable. But for more professional stuff I'd go to Polar Pro, its more accurate, also that natural look, extra sharpness, and the set of 5 stops make it more engaging as you need to use them effectively in any situation and thus leveling up your videography skills.
🖤 I’m gonna buy jjc ND filter great comparison u saved my pockets man
I got 5 for 5 on the guessing. JJC warmth is better. PMcK I don't support, so it would be an easy choice for me. BTW, I've been watching your videos for a while now and have not ever felt the need to zoom into anything. :-)
The reason it works like a polarizer is because variable nds are basically two polarized filters on top of each other.
Very Good video, i got the same jjc ! i have chosen the better looking video and was always at the JJC ;)
Through this review I’m buying JJC filter hope I made the right decision 😅
I guessed everything! Polar Pro Variable ND was brighter/overexposed on all photos.
The stills out of JJC are definitely nicer. Video from JJC seems oversaturated (PM is spot on for skin tones). However that isn't worth the price tag. I currently have a variable K&F for long exposures and I do notice some quality loss (minor but I'm nit picky). Might give JJC a try!
Hey Peter! I agree the JJC is warmer and I would buy it over the PM filter. I give him high marks on branding and packaging as well as how cool the filer itself looks. But I think it's overpriced as well. But, could having a more neutral color be best for color grading? Sayin' hey.... Greg
I use Gobe filters. They are great as well.
Very easy see the difference. I actually prefer the look of the JJC.
This did help. I have been searching for "essential" gear and the ND filter has come up a lot in other YT suggestions.
It is not the most "essential", but it does help you to be able to use the 180º shutter rule. That way you can have smooth motion blur
First time here and enjoyed it 🤙 About the filter...well love Peter and as you said I'm sure very good filter but no way I will pay this price even with the autographed case 😜
Thank you Peter!
I like Peter McKinnon, but I would take the JJC filter over the Polar Pro all day long.
I really like the protective rubber cover you get with the polar pro. My camera feels like tank when I have it on. It is very smooth to turn and i would be suprised if the case it came with ever broke.
Surprised the PolarPro had such a noticeable color cast over the JJC, got all right 👍
The versatility of the jjc wins for me. Great review Peter!
I’m going with JJc .
Question: Would an 82mm lens cap work with the 77mm size because the lens cap (77mm) won't fit on front of this filter
I am very happy with k & f vnd
Unpopular opinion - I could tell which one was the polar pro each time and thought it looked substantially better.
I am with the JJC personally
in the blind test, i kept finding the jcc sharper
JJC by far 5/5
U didn't show result at 16mm with polar pro as u show with jjc
Thank you so much for making me save 190$
just bought the jjc filter
I got all right. 😊
Saved me some money. Nice 👍🏽
I rather the magnetic Freewell nd variable filters over the Polar Pro, and it's a third of the price
I guessed all of them right coz the other one you been using has a very slight greenish tint
I am proud of myself. I guessed them all correctly! I definitely like the warmer cast of the JJC the blues looked a little distracting on the polar pro when comparing them
The only downside to the JJCis that they don't make them for 86mm filter thread size
Would it have been better if you got the 6-9 stop?
I’d buy the freewell but that because of the magnetic filter thread
Finally someone actually spoke their mind about the over priced filter!! Well done Peter!!
Yea because have P McKinnon's signature on it really makes the image better .. For F%^$# sake.
Man, that JJC filter looked way better! More comparison videos like this 👍🏻
Oh hello there.
That is mostly because it's polarized so it removes the cold blue reflections. It has a better bokeh tho which is significant. Also in case you are shooting over coated windows or LED displays, the polarized filter is extremely problematic because it makes ghosts over these surfaces.
It was an easy differentiation. It is overpriced.
I personally would go for JJC.
And also, did the filter break??🤣🤣🤣
Haha, it survived 😂
Please DO Kase Filters Kit Sir !!!
I’m betting I can find a filter as good (if not better) than the PMcK for a $100 less. Super cool packaging does not impress me. Where was the money spent, on the filter or the packaging? Simple and sturdy will do.
@@GS-vb3zn You probably can find a set of 3 as good for $200 less...
Thank you so much for the comparison, everybody's buying Peter's filter like is pure gold. I am not saying is bad or anything but you know, it's too pricey for what it is. Thanks a lot!
@@JonackFilm I have a cheap one too and it is fine. I think most filters have pros and cons, not for buying a expensive one you are free of color aberrations or changes on the image quality. Every piece of glass affects the image no matter how expensive. I think they just up the price by adding Peter's name😂
I got all five right, and I have to say, I personally preferred the look of the JJC a bit more on almost every shot, and that was before I even confirmed what filter was used. It was pretty easy to tell due to the slightly warmer tones of the JJC, as you mentioned, but personally I liked the look! This video was super helpful, I definitely know which ND filter I'll be buying!
Me last week : I think I’m gonna get PM PolarPro ND filter
Me today : euh.. Thank you Peter for the comparaison. I’m getting the JJC ☺️😂🤣
Words right off my keyboard.....
Legit Me!!!
Could tell every single one cause of the yellow tint. That’s usually a sign of a cheaper filter in general. It’s easier to add that in post if you like the look rather than remove it.
I would buy the JJC, thanks for the rundown.
I’m definitely buying the JJC Variable ND filters.
When can we get the PL edition of the JJC filter? :-)
Gangster lol
🔥
I’ve been saying they were overpriced since they were released. All the sponsored youtubers jumped on the bandwagon and basically ripped off their viewers. Great vid 👍✌️
I simply chose the best looking image and the JJC won every time! Thank you for this Peter, and I agree with your review. And the fact that your own videos look fantastic, I think you should continue with the JJC! 👍
I liked the JJC footage better by far in every comparison. I use K&F Concepts variable NDs, and after seeing this, I don’t know if it’d worth buying the PolarPro to even compare.
It does comes down to personal taste, but I do prefer the look of the JJC. Was looking to buy one, thanks for the video!
I love PM but I'd have to go with the JJC and 60 buk is still alot a money for a filter let alone 240😱...240 $ could get me so many more useful gear. Like a rode wireless go or something else
5:21 always cracks me up when you're dropping things haha
Also I'm using the JJC for professional use because its cheap and it works
Its easy to drop filters since you handle them by the tips of your fingers. One reason why I always move to soft ground or carpet when changing them.
It's easy to see the difference. PolarPro has a blue hue. I'm personally tried Tiffen and K&F so far. Also, K&F have a CPL as well. In my opinion, K&F wins! If anyone gets a chance, you should take a look at K&F VND+CPL. Hopefully, this helps! Have an amazing day!
what VND of K&F have you used ? I have been take a look about their products and there are so many VND, I dont know which one is the best and does they have the cross X issue or not, I also want to use VND for both portrait photography and landscape
@@lamkyo1203 they doesn't have cross x issue, except you slid more than the max
I hate to be that TH-cam commenter, but I think a couple things need to be said.
Variable ND Filters are 4 layers with 2 CPL filters. The cross pattern occurs due to the overlap of the CPL. If a cross pattern doesn't occur its because there is a range limiter on the filter.
2-400 is the ND Number, the Polar Pro Filter is 2-5 stops. Take the log base 2 of 2 and 400 to get the number of stops: from 1 to 8.64 at the highend. You have 3 extra stops of density. That's really big and is why the one JJC filter is so much darker than the Polar Pro.
Still great value as demonstrated.