Chartek 2218 vs. Cementitious Passive Fire Protection

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @bond00000071
    @bond00000071 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much time does it take to apply jetfire requirement

  • @bond00000071
    @bond00000071 ปีที่แล้ว

    And also what is the thickness of one coat

  • @tatlibebekler3405
    @tatlibebekler3405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. I am doing this job in Azerbaijan. how can i join you i would like to work with you

  • @IPProtectiveCoatings
    @IPProtectiveCoatings  7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Introducing the fastest and most efficient epoxy passive fire protection for onshore projects - Chartek 2218 offers simplified reinforcement installation and unique rapid cure enabling fast application, improved production rates and reduced overall costs. AkzoNobel Protective Coatings demonstrate the benefits of using Chartek 2218 vs. cementitious fire proofing. www.chartek.com info.protectivecoatingsme@akzonobel.com

    • @turguttturgutt6139
      @turguttturgutt6139 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to compare it on site under construction when scaffolding erected for fireproofing, I agree if work shop application Chartek is easy but at site and for cost wise Cementitious is far cheaper than chartek.