I've been working on a case as a Pro Se for a while now. My hubby can always tell when I've been writing briefs in my emails because of how my writing is. It's too funny, though luckily, not as bad as your email. Im just more direct and blunt. This of course has changed over time as I've learned more how to write for legal purposes.
It has always been the goal of legalese (another language) to make the text non-understandable to the layman, same for medical gibberish, it is call a con, more precisely a con game...
@@synergeticseducation Having no content and no subscribers is not necessarily a bad thing. We must analyse his words. Here, they have no attempt to use evidence in their accusation, thus making it entirely unfounded and frivoulos.
I could listen to this guy all day long I like his style of delivery.
Exactly what I was thinking. He is clear.
So basically non-lawyers have been doing it right all along....🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 Thank you for this presentation.
Thanks for this.
You've helped me rethink my vocational email style (I am considered a combative know-it-all by my managers 😅).
Thanks again 🙏🙂
from "there" locations? Priceless!
I've been working on a case as a Pro Se for a while now. My hubby can always tell when I've been writing briefs in my emails because of how my writing is. It's too funny, though luckily, not as bad as your email. Im just more direct and blunt. This of course has changed over time as I've learned more how to write for legal purposes.
putting the strategy together in the right content
Biggest challenge in writing ?
Being succinct yet comprehensible.
You're right, and We address that! Check out our "Style" videos
getting started.
The speaker mentioned the book about the legal writing skills. Can you please tell me the name of the book, please.
Legal Writing Coach by Chris Jensen
legal writing coach by chris jensen
Ty
Oohhh, this is the public defenders, workshop for inner city youth. Sorry, I'm in the wrong class room. 😹
I see these kind of legal writing each and every time and honestly I love how they chose their sentences
In 2023, I'm curious if the instructor and participants have switched to using ChatGPT instead.
No because it’s been proven to not be reliable in legal writing.
It has always been the goal of legalese (another language) to make the text non-understandable to the layman, same for medical gibberish, it is call a con, more precisely a con game...
Anyone who attended this presentation and learned something should find a new profession.
Did I hear him say “…once they put theirselves…?” (3:30) Um…
This guy is a complete doofus!
LMAOOOO
comment from a fake channel with no content or subscribers
@@synergeticseducation Having no content and no subscribers is not necessarily a bad thing. We must analyse his words.
Here, they have no attempt to use evidence in their accusation, thus making it entirely unfounded and frivoulos.
@@56independent the world's top law firm would probably not hire a doofus to teach them the main skill they need to make money - legal writing.
@@synergeticseducation Yes but in the investment world keeping your secrets is important so maybe they're misleading people just to make more money
What a cringy presenter lol
Show us what you've got then!