New Tier 10 German Destroyer For Steel - Z-42 First Impressions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ก.ค. 2024
  • Second Channel for full games and Stream Highlights: / @pqlive228
    Watch me live on Twitch: / potatoquality_
    Join the Discord! / discord
    If you want to know how I mod my game to look the way it does here is a video: • How To Install Mods Fo...
    I'm PQ. Hopefully, on this channel, I can teach you a bit about how I play the game. Thanks for watching.
    WoWs NA Invite: warships.us/Potato_Quality
    WoWs RU Invite: flot.ru/Potato_Quality
    Business inquiries only: potatoquality.business@gmail.com
    Carry, Pushing, How To Win, How To Carry, Pro, Unicum, Tutorial, Guide, World of Warships, Fun, Funny, Captain Skills, Changes, Build, CC, Community Contributor, OP, DPM, Z52, Z-52, Z-44, Z-42, 42, German, DD, Destroyer, Steel, Premium, Armory, Harugumo, Hydro, Daring, Smoke,
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 150

  • @heyloranium9337
    @heyloranium9337 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    When turning the ship is almost as quick as turning the turrets. 🤣

  • @MrTrool323
    @MrTrool323 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    To be honest Z-42 kinda got overnerfed last time,it was pretty damn strong but a tweak would have been enough instead of a pretty signifficant nerf
    It was a German Harugumo which is something interesting but with hydro and very special smoke
    Similar style of game to Cossack

    • @M4DM4X
      @M4DM4X ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Best definition "

    • @GodOfWaaar
      @GodOfWaaar ปีที่แล้ว +9

      but who wants a Harugumo with british smoke and hydro in the game?

    • @MrTrool323
      @MrTrool323 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@GodOfWaaar Considering the normal Haru has pretty good torps and legendary upgrade which takes the farming to another level...
      Smoke was fine,hydro could have been changed from 6 to 5 km and it would solve the "can spot before gets spotted" without obliterating the rest
      What Steel ship is a weak one when you have the likes of Stalingrad
      And considering what stuff is about to come into the game *European Style of Radar Smoke DD's with Gdansk as the top of the line...*

    • @kagakai7729
      @kagakai7729 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MrTrool323 "what steel ship is weak when you have a big hunkashit that bursts into flames like a Californian gender reveal party, can't take skills to augument its tankiness, gets spotted from space, and gets devstriked if a single Bismarck has your side"

    • @forge16hanadamaintenancedr43
      @forge16hanadamaintenancedr43 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The nerf probably came in mind of Lutjens. With Lutjens active, Z-42 has about 10k higher AP DPM than harugumo even post nerf, and that seems to be what they are aiming for. A gimmicky harugumo with the weakness against torpedoes removed. IMO this is a reasonably strong steel ship, something like shikishima if you want a comparison - as strong as the tech-tree one, but with some gimmicks and some weakness mitigated.
      As for the new european DD branch - I'd say don't worry about it, there's no way such a jack-of-all-trade with such absurd strength makes it into the game. One way or another they will be nerfed into oblivion, the only question is how.

  • @Beep2bleep
    @Beep2bleep ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I think you really want to get grease the gears esp. with Lutjens. You've got so many things boosting your gun DPM, but that doesn't matter if you whenever your guns are off target due to traverse. Lutjens gives you 20% for 1 point I think that makes are more sense then some of the other commander skills you took.

    • @tmGrunty
      @tmGrunty ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You can also switch out the Aiming System mod for Turret Traverse mod.

  • @RySLz
    @RySLz ปีที่แล้ว +43

    These german steel ships are a good example of new content without power creep - too bad that doesn't apply to CVs, subs or anything russian!

    • @derrickstorm6976
      @derrickstorm6976 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And too bad all other new content is always power creeping...

  • @joshuasheppard5952
    @joshuasheppard5952 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Unsurprisingly, the Midway got the combat scout achievement in the first game. Z42 looks fun-ish

  • @derrickstorm6976
    @derrickstorm6976 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    A German fun ship in development = neutered

  • @MMNDrDre
    @MMNDrDre ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Like the review. I'm interested in this style of ship, I will be getting it.

  • @gstormcz
    @gstormcz ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Damage numbers performed here look very good, maybe I am wrong, but it seems to me, that DDs main goal is not dealing damage, but rather more goals, incl spotting (damage), capping and dealing with enemy light armor alot.
    I think it is finally reflected by different damage achievements for each class.
    Nobody really wants Harugumo DPM copy with extra german hydro and brittish fast smoke, that would make it DD undertaker.
    I am bit dissapointed by its torpedo set, either quintuples or 12km would be ok for steel ship, but this just seems you gonna have troubles when radar ship stay there and gun traverse speed won't help much. But it's more gunboat, so bit weaker on torps is ok.
    That unusual combo of fast smokes and german hydro seems the thing what makes it worthy of consideration finally (sorry if I am repeating your words, SLM).

  • @gaborferenc2276
    @gaborferenc2276 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    and to the sub: LOL [the laughter is fake, but the tears are real]: a bunch of HE hits + 8 depth charge hits, yet the sub will sink you. WG at its best

  • @old_guard2431
    @old_guard2431 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good call, WG. A lot of Bismarcks laid up in ordinary waiting for main battery guns that shoot straight. Might as well get some mileage out of their secondaries.

  • @Medic427
    @Medic427 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you do a beginner help series? There’s so much I want to get into with this, but it’s been so many years since I played before this past time getting in. It may help just to know basic stuff. How do you slide the camera over in the bino view?

  • @pcsproshop8972
    @pcsproshop8972 ปีที่แล้ว

    TY PQ!
    Shared with clan :)
    she's the talk of the patch~

  • @waffle3632
    @waffle3632 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm not too impressed, it got way over nerfed. To take advantage of the smoke hydro combo it has to push in, but the slow turret Traverse makes that difficult. I think the harugumo does it better. If I pick this up it will be for my last steel ship

  • @sknoppers217
    @sknoppers217 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love the z52 line to have this kind of smoke too, it would make them a lot more playable than the current german smoke

  • @Careoran
    @Careoran ปีที่แล้ว

    nice, looking forward to it

  • @Asianese
    @Asianese ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reminds me of the Fen Yang kinda, strong AP, weak HE (low pen but high fire chance), and situational torpedoes. No hydro tho, but defensive fire and torpio reload booster.

  • @maperuva8995
    @maperuva8995 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello thanks for your video and all the content. I wanted to ask you where you found the crosshair you're using, I have searched both the vanilla selection and Aslain's and couldn't find it, thanks. Also how do you display the radar/hydro radii on the minimap ? Have a great one

  • @charleslynch340
    @charleslynch340 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AP Harugumo with crazy hydro and bursty smoke, expect to see this one in competitive

  • @mamibufi
    @mamibufi ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you make the player count visible in the top left corner? and how are you tracking these dditional resources like coal and steel?

  • @heatherrockwell9012
    @heatherrockwell9012 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "And that's fair, it takes a while to learn this game"
    Longer for some of us than others...

  • @hond654
    @hond654 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    27:21 this is why you NEVER try to hunt a sub in DD!

    • @Skerra-kk6sm
      @Skerra-kk6sm ปีที่แล้ว

      They really need to model dds on the WWII class of ships specifically designed to hunt Subs.......

    • @hond654
      @hond654 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Skerra-kk6sm An easy fix would be to adjust DDs detectability to 1-2km by sub, and usual 5-9km for everything else.

    • @scotblair3717
      @scotblair3717 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you kidding? I LOVE hunting subs in DDs--totally fun, and a unique niche role, and a good DC drop is death to subs, but you do have to be careful of the sub's stern tubes when passing one.

    • @hond654
      @hond654 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scotblair3717 He had 8 hits, no kill. If sub has competent teammates then you are shot into pieces. You can kill overextended subs, but try this against a good one. I think it is not worth at the beginning of the game. I agree, in the endgame, if your DD survived, yes, you can have fun and take risk - DD was still killed by the sub, so you don't do this at the start. Generally, BBs are much better for that, unless they are A/H line campers, but then you lost already.

    • @Ett.Gammalt.Bergtroll
      @Ett.Gammalt.Bergtroll ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Skerra-kk6sm The entire Swedish line of DDs are actually dedicated sub-hunters IRL. Those scaffold-looking structures on the turrets are actually launch ramps for *anti-submarine missiles.*

  • @travelwell8098
    @travelwell8098 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the combination of low alpha torps and the slow turret traverse is enough for me to pass.... especially since I'm a pretty bad player anyway.
    Thanks for the video!

  • @katherinesilens2994
    @katherinesilens2994 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My theory build for this is Preventative Maintenance, Last Stand, Survivability Expert, Concealment Expert, Adrenaline Rush, Grease the Gears, Extra-Heavy Ammunition, Main Battery & AA Specialist, Demolition Expert.
    Basically same build but drop SI for Demolition Expert + Grease the Gears. SI isn't that valuable because no heal and high smoke count. Grease the Gears is great because of the traverse, and the Demolition Expert has an oversized impact on Z-42 because it helps out the weaker HE and boosts your firestarting much more in proportion to any other ship because the base fire chance per shell is so low (5%). Bringing it up to 6% with DE is 20% more fires. Combined with quarter-pen and the extremely high shells per minute, the HE isn't really that bad once you add DE into the mix. I use the same build on Z-35 which feels similar. Another option is finishing with Consumables Expert instead for +10% on the hydro; with the hydro coal mod, you can bring it up to 156 seconds which makes loss of SI hurt even less.

    • @tmGrunty
      @tmGrunty ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd also drop the SI but instead of Demolition Expert I will probanly pick up Consumables Enhancement for longer Hydro and Speed Boost duration.
      I don't think the extra 1% fire chance will make a difference so I'd rather have longer consumables, espcially considering you lose 1 charge of them due to not having Superintendent.

    • @ReDiR20
      @ReDiR20 ปีที่แล้ว

      DE is a must. I use it on Takahashi too, the more guns on the Ship the more useful is DE

  • @sozetsukokai9327
    @sozetsukokai9327 ปีที่แล้ว

    aren't those the same torps as the t-22 has?

  • @saintzero9044
    @saintzero9044 ปีที่แล้ว

    It will be harder than z52 or softer?

  • @theaffiliate4208
    @theaffiliate4208 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you had the choice between the Z-42 or the Ragnar for your next steel ship, which would you choose?

  • @MechFrankaTLieu
    @MechFrankaTLieu ปีที่แล้ว +3

    how often one really not seeing RADAR at these high tier games today , more like the exception than the norm and add on top CC, and SS

  • @AdalbertSchneider_
    @AdalbertSchneider_ ปีที่แล้ว +10

    10:25 PQ... if you only would check the ship stats on some of the stat webs, you would know that you have standard 10ms short fuse and 18mm only fuse arming treshold. So literaly zero chance to owerpen on DD hulls, only if you hit some thinner superstructures.
    Other questions - why not IFHE ? You would pen 32, just like your ( mentioned ) german 105mm secondaries, which you know what that mean - all the 27, 30, and 32mm things being not shatters but pen dmg. Well, we will see us later... PS EDIT: 1st game 3,3k fire dmg btw... so yeah, IFHE...

    • @NoName-wi8xz
      @NoName-wi8xz ปีที่แล้ว

      IFHE makes sense to me as well, but on the other hand, u would have to sacrifice one of the other 3 point perks and all of them seem quite usefull. PQ was mainly using AP so idk if ifhe is worth it in that case

    • @AdalbertSchneider_
      @AdalbertSchneider_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NoName-wi8xz ofc it is, you can live without superintendant, you have already 6 smokes. and there will be many situations where HE ( with 32mm pen ) will be much more usefull.

    • @tmGrunty
      @tmGrunty ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You really cripple your fire chance if you take it and considering how much higher the AP damage is it makes sense to focus in that instead.
      The He damage is just pityful and you really don't want to shoot HE.

  • @Skerra-kk6sm
    @Skerra-kk6sm ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If only Lutjens could be used in Clan Battles. WG balancing ships based entirely on specialty captains is kind of BS imo.

  • @paddington1670
    @paddington1670 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    gasp! so I didnt buy Plymouth yet but I watch your video on it and I love my Minotard and I did love the Z52 when it came out. Jeez I only have enough to choose any one steel ship. hmmm, thanks for the videos anyway!

    • @tahiribnmohammad5410
      @tahiribnmohammad5410 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dont buy plymouth, mimo is much better

    • @kagakai7729
      @kagakai7729 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Plymouth is a good ship. It trades a bit of DPM for straight up alpha, which actually is a VERY good trade when you consider that one of the biggest problems that makes radar mino absolutely dented is that DDs with a brain just angle to you the moment you radar them, so you only really get one good salvo of damage. I'd rather do a good Plymouth salvo than a good Minotaur salvo. Furthermore, Minotaur has to choose between smoke and radar. Plymouth just gets both. So you can smoke up near a cap circle and anyone who tries to approach you will get radared and farmed. You're a complete no-go zone for DDs, and unlike Mino, they can't even see you.

  • @finalchapter24k
    @finalchapter24k ปีที่แล้ว

    What screen resolution is you monitor? You have a lot more real estate that my 1920x1080.

  • @Alex-hy9cw
    @Alex-hy9cw ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ah yh , the quite op dd that they gutted in a single patch afterwards

  • @phantomklepht7675
    @phantomklepht7675 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this ship comparable with Daring?

  • @Skerra-kk6sm
    @Skerra-kk6sm ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Call me crazy but making dds immune to pings might work to help balance them against subs.

  • @KiltenthTV
    @KiltenthTV ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I don't think It's worth the steel, especially for those who are in clans that doesn't do that much battles, those who doesn't get to rank 1 every season (because not everybody has that much patience to garbage players). It could've been an awesome gimmicky coal ship tho. Looking at other steel ships, they have a lot more gimmicks than this. One has Satsuma guns with harugumo secondaries, one is basically a cruiser with 508mm guns, other one has literally everything but only the caliber is small (which doesn't matter that much unless you are firing ap to angled target, but why would you), one is alsace but gazillion times better, no need to talk about fdr, sap psycho austin, etc etc. This ship feels a bit meh compared to these.

  • @old_guard2431
    @old_guard2431 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Seems like a well-balanced ship, especially for a recent design. They used the number from a cancelled 1936b hull, which allowed them to work with the Tier VIII Z-35 hull. Swapping out the standard 128mm surface-only single mounts for dual-purpose 105mm twin mounts would be a logical choice for work in the English Channel in the mid to late war as the Allies gained air superiority.
    In short, enough gimmicks to keep a Tier VIII hull viable in the gimmick-rich Tier X environment, but not overpowered. A minor disappointment in getting the conventional depth charge rails rather than the depth charge throwers of the real 1936b destroyers. It would be nice to be able to land depth charges on subs without having to run right over them. But both AA and ASW upgrades are kissing-your-sister perks anyway. Not like you are ever going to be able to actually counter skilled players in WG’s favorite ship classes.
    That’s a lot of steel, though. An expensive commodity.

    • @bobbwc7011
      @bobbwc7011 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yeah, very interesting, a "well-balanced ship". Funny how only the German ships get "well-balanced" and literally every other nice looking idea gets OP or super OP properties to make it fun, engaging and lasting in the game. The only exception is the recent line of Japanese cruisers, which are mostly dogshit.
      Z-42 appears to be one of the weakest Steel ships - I would even prefer the Somers because it still has got the torpedo power. For a gunboat the Z-42 is not good enough. I have checked my today's games again before commenting here: 11 games so far, games with NO radar cruiser in the enemy team: ZERO. Games with radar cruisers having 10 km or 12 km radar range: 8 out of 11. The other 3 games were Salem's, Plymouth's and so on.
      So how viable is such a ship when only unicums or super-unicums can really enjoy it.
      Why waste the Steel when at the same time Ragnar is available, or when new smoke-radar tech tree DD's are released etc. etc. Why playing the Z-42 when the Daring is a well-proven tech tree ship? Even the Black in Tier 9 makes more sense because it has the long range torpedoes which hit hard. The torp speed of 45 kn is irrelevant. Smoke and radar is so nice that even normal players can obtain great results in ships like the Black.
      To me, Z-42 is dead on arrival, because for some reason they decide to "balance" the ship. And don't get me wrong, I wish they would return to a more traditional rock-paper-scissors approach and make all ships have significant downsides...but that's not what WG is doing. They continuously release bullshit stronK ships with a million consumables and gimmicks, so that - in comparison - German ships make no sense in 9 out or 10 cases. They are too balanced to be competitive for more than 75% of the player base. Think about bullshit like Friedrich, Pommern, etc. including the Meta morphing into more and more passive, stale gameplay, punishing brawling.

    • @arifulhoque9558
      @arifulhoque9558 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobbwc7011 german dds were supposed to be gun boat initially in the game but they turned into weak boat instead in the current meta with all these balanced ships.

  • @user-bl1sg5sh8j
    @user-bl1sg5sh8j ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate to bring this up but the whole 15 slavos it took to do anemic damage to that sub at 26:22 was hilarious game design while all the sub had to do was line up 2 torps to remove most of the DDs health... oof maybe AP would have faired better?

  • @franz265
    @franz265 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Might be an ok ship for the current meta. But no improved ricochet angles is a big downside and once people know the ship wil be much worse in combat.

  • @jean-philippemorin1176
    @jean-philippemorin1176 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why play this over daring?

  • @bobbwc7011
    @bobbwc7011 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    10 km torps are almost useless these days. It works on an OP blob like Benham, but even the Benham (2019) struggles against the many radars.
    I think they made a German ship which is more viable than normal German ships but it still has so many downsides for normal players.
    Most of the player base is not unicum or super-unicum.

  • @avimin
    @avimin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The real question is which one is the better pick for steel for the first time if you wanted a steel DD - this or Ragnar?

    • @Skerra-kk6sm
      @Skerra-kk6sm ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends, are you a brawler or a long range sniper?

  • @borislohmeyer3695
    @borislohmeyer3695 ปีที่แล้ว

    dont get it why ppl compare this boat with harugumo. its more like a german t10 cossack. whats the unmodified gunrange? for me back in my active days 12-12.5 km was the magic number so u could invest mods or captain skills in other departments than gunrange

  • @thepaperbagmask
    @thepaperbagmask ปีที่แล้ว

    Good matches! Sad to see the sub doing sub things but hey, shotgunning is rare, right? :D

  • @TK-fk4po
    @TK-fk4po ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Omg that turret traverse looks painful. Otherwise though seems pretty good.

    • @zane660
      @zane660 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just skill grease the gears and if its still to slow put the module on. Its like Klebers traverse

    • @TK-fk4po
      @TK-fk4po ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zane660 Yep. No way I could live with that traverse as it is

  • @Chucky925
    @Chucky925 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm just curious since this is a T10 ship why! Isn't it named Z58 or Z60 or higher??

    • @tmGrunty
      @tmGrunty ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s based on a Zerstörer 1936B hull.
      The Z-46 (ingame) already is based on its successor the Zerstörer 1936C and the Z-52 is even more advanced.
      So with Z-42 using the 1936B hull the number had to be lower for this ship and Z-42 makes sense.

    • @Chucky925
      @Chucky925 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tmGrunty ok thanks for clarifying that for me I was curious how that worked....

  • @tehalexy
    @tehalexy ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Underwhelming for a Steel Ship imho.
    Wouldn't play it even if i've got it with a container.

  • @hazand3514
    @hazand3514 ปีที่แล้ว

    So now we make a jinan again with sa zhenbing skill:D

  • @foreverpsycotic
    @foreverpsycotic ปีที่แล้ว

    So its just a more sophisticated z35?

  • @Billswiftgti
    @Billswiftgti ปีที่แล้ว

    I get combat scout a fair amount of times, is it hard?

  • @admiral2430
    @admiral2430 ปีที่แล้ว

    dang, i want McBurger and this Ship
    but i dont play rank or CB 🤣😂

  • @MartyInLa
    @MartyInLa ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm waiting for the MZ-42.

    • @bobbwc7011
      @bobbwc7011 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that a motorcycle made in Saxony?

  • @CHILE_TZ
    @CHILE_TZ ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like you will need RL if you don't want to be surprised by a DD

  • @waynelawrence5220
    @waynelawrence5220 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So If you don't have Ragnar, would you take Ragnar or Z-42 first?

    • @rowinglove4ever
      @rowinglove4ever ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had the same thought! I had the steel for the z42! I didn't had any steel ship! Because I had småland I was waiting for that z42 to be my first steel, but after that nerf I get Ragnar! Maybe I will get z42 next year! Keep in mind that Ragnar is 1.5 year out ,, so they might remove her! No! I don't think z42 is better! It would be better before the nerf! 160.000 base He dpm no heal no armor no radar no! Akizuki have something like 190.000base dpm! Wow just can't stand to release a good German ship! Since German invasion xd

    • @j_taylor
      @j_taylor ปีที่แล้ว

      Ragnar is a fun gunboat. It has the problem that captain skills are very different from other European DDs, except Friesland which is close.
      If you like gunboating and can dedicate a captain, you will probably enjoy Ragnar.

    • @waynelawrence5220
      @waynelawrence5220 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@j_taylor I have Friesland which is one of my fav DD's and a 21pt commander I play on her. So I have been leaning toward Ragnar but have been waiting for Z42 to see how she came out in her final state.

    • @rowinglove4ever
      @rowinglove4ever ปีที่แล้ว

      @@waynelawrence5220 I have Groningen with 21 skill commander and she is one of my fav dds! If you have Friesland you're familiar with no torp gun boat dds! I love that play style! I like so much gun boat dds that I play them in a row something like Ragnar then Groningen then Smaland and when I play småland I forget to torp! Z42 have different play style than Ragnar tho! Z42 is more like Daring. I'm completely disappointed with that z42! They destroy her dpm for that British smokes + 6km hydro! There is a lot better dds with much higher he dpm that in 1 vs 1 fight will melt z42! And that is Ragnar too! Ragnar can win in 1vs1 with all dds! Even with småland!

  • @JOELJWINSONMoe
    @JOELJWINSONMoe ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Maybe adding another turet can fix it ??

    • @wojtek4p4
      @wojtek4p4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The american solution

    • @Ketzoooorrr
      @Ketzoooorrr ปีที่แล้ว

      Just another turret bro, trust me!

  • @aRaNarB
    @aRaNarB ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I honestly don't understand why this ship even exists, the Z-49 and Z-52 do the job better than the Z-42 by a mile. They offer better torps, concealment, speed, and guns, when I first heard of this ship I was hoping for something interesting but no, sadly not

  • @eragonrank5303
    @eragonrank5303 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's Zed PQ! ZED! XD

    • @bobbwc7011
      @bobbwc7011 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nein! Es heißt Zett! Zett! Zett zweiundvierzig!!! (z = ts)

  • @Brettcroese
    @Brettcroese ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Too bad this ship was nerfed into the ground

  • @LilyTheCat151
    @LilyTheCat151 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Z42 had the makings of a very exciting ship. WG: Hold my beer. Can't have that. Nerf into oblivion and make useless. I really wanted this ship until WG started to hurt it. Rather than tweaking it a little, they batter it.

    • @wapiti128
      @wapiti128 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What did they do to it?

  • @TheSanco26
    @TheSanco26 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:13 Without the flags we end up at 5% fire chance.

  • @christophersmith9074
    @christophersmith9074 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looks like a germen harugumo lol

  • @Hulivilivoo
    @Hulivilivoo ปีที่แล้ว

    "Shotgunning subs isnt a problem in wows"

  • @keithnelson1014
    @keithnelson1014 ปีที่แล้ว

    Right

  • @shadthompson9297
    @shadthompson9297 ปีที่แล้ว

    I probably don't want this ship. Thanks for the review. That dd is not my playstyle.

  • @dennisa.3035
    @dennisa.3035 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Södermanland? wth is that 😳

  • @Meonium
    @Meonium ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, basically British DD but with German skin

    • @benitoschmidt95
      @benitoschmidt95 ปีที่แล้ว

      Basically Z-35 with 5 --> 6km Hydro, higher DPM and engine boost as well as "better" AA and better topps (6-10 km) traded for less Pen (32-->26 mm) and being T8 --> T10

  • @Omegawerewolfx
    @Omegawerewolfx ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I got it. I have not used it yet. No time with work. Plus I hate subs, superships, and CVs. So t10 games are not a regular thing for me anymore.
    I have the base reload down to 4 seconds. I am running the Hydro module and Grease the Gears. I am considering also using the Turret Rotation module, currently using the -7% dispersion module. Gotta play a few games before deciding. I am using the Adrenaline Rush and the 4pt Brawler skill (detected bonus to reload), trying to get the gun output set up for fighting DDs and closer ranged fights (ie at caps or in the end game).
    Just my initial thought, Vampire II might be the better option. I'll figure it out once I play a good ten or so games. I really enjoy Vampire II.
    On a side note: Submarines are such bullshit it's ruined the game for me. When they're added to ranked I will be down to Clan Battles being the main mode I play.
    If subs get added to CBs I will be leaving the game. WarGaming can kiss my ass.
    EDIT
    After five games I have decided I am not going to try and kill DDs like a DD hunter. The guns hit hard, the AP anyway. The Hydro is nice with the short burst smokes, but the dpm isn't enough to make up for the clumsy maneuverability (for me) and the fact everything has radar or hydro so the smokes were not helping me.
    I'm switching to IFE and Main Battery Specialist. I'll play outside and work my way in.
    I got Cv focused twice and averaged 22 planes a game. Not sure if that's good or bad, but I think I did ok.

  • @leedonghun192
    @leedonghun192 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it would have been better if nerf the torpedo and burf the main gun a little more.
    Current performance is more like a coal ship than a steel ship

  • @rowinglove4ever
    @rowinglove4ever ปีที่แล้ว

    Give up superintendent and try full gun boat build with fearless browler for max dpm and grease the gears maybe!

  • @jonathanbaron-crangle5093
    @jonathanbaron-crangle5093 ปีที่แล้ว

    PQ, I see you have 250 ships: If you played one each for a FULL match in Random, that'd be 5,000 minutes of your life gone (& probably your sanity too)
    Signed:
    A player with not even 100 ships lol

  • @johnweir9447
    @johnweir9447 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So lets review: poor concealment (compared to the tech tree), smaller/worse guns (low fire chance, slow rotation), no heal, low torpedo damage....you played very well, yet a tier 8 tech tree submarine did better....

  •  ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Instead of using real type 39 destroyers...

  • @teemuhasu2302
    @teemuhasu2302 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looking at the encounter with that sub there im glad i left this game for good. It atleast hasnt been going to better since my leaving.

    • @olafmesschendorp147
      @olafmesschendorp147 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who asked

    • @danh7411
      @danh7411 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@olafmesschendorp147 I asked

    • @conradzoo
      @conradzoo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@olafmesschendorp147 so what?

    • @teemuhasu2302
      @teemuhasu2302 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@olafmesschendorp147 I would say your mom but she already knows...ok that was bad one.

  • @gaborferenc2276
    @gaborferenc2276 ปีที่แล้ว

    close encounters, that might be the counter. that turret traverse speed looks atrocious

  • @hagostaeldmann
    @hagostaeldmann ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Z-42 is worse than the Z-52 in every single way except it has 10% better DPM....which is completely negated by having worse shell arcs, much worse turret traverse, and HE not penning 32mm. The audacity to charge steel for a boat that is objectively worse than its tech tree counterpart and offers no playstyle difference is insane.

    • @unshiftedcobra7439
      @unshiftedcobra7439 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're on crack if you think Z-52 is better than Z-42. Z-42's guns can pen 32mm if you take IFHE and the AP shreds DDs due to its low arming threshold of 18mm. Also, Z-42's short burst smoke is WAY better than Z-52's garbage smoke generator because it allows Z-42 to effectively farm ships and reposition quickly if needed.

  • @johnnypatterson7512
    @johnnypatterson7512 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    This ship is a waste of Steel. Just stick with the Z-52.

    • @seanelucero
      @seanelucero ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks

    • @Momofukudoodoowindu
      @Momofukudoodoowindu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I liked the original idea of it. A DD knife fighter that could hold its own with the likes of Smaland/Daring/Vampire but have monsterous AP that makes showing broadside terrifying in a dual. They definitely overnerfed it.

    • @johnday6739
      @johnday6739 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have almost every tier X dd in the game (ragnar) and Z-42 is already one of my favorites. The ONLY thing I fear in her is Smaland. It murders everything else. The Hydro trap, insane ap against DD's and short burst smokes are a VERY powerful combo when utilized correctly.

    • @princeangelobaybayan722
      @princeangelobaybayan722 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fr this was a waste i should have gotten yoshino

  • @ted5782
    @ted5782 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gameplay of this review is useless. Play a few with a couple radar ships and the CV sitting on you all game long.

  • @rowinglove4ever
    @rowinglove4ever ปีที่แล้ว

    The way you deal with this thing is so simple! Just wait for his smoke to be vanished! Wait with your kleber Marceau Daring then z42 don't have the dpm or the hp to keep up! This ship need baff at least 50.000 HE dpm

  • @1338Sunshine
    @1338Sunshine ปีที่แล้ว

    Another bs sub shotgun kill lol

  • @klegolas4088
    @klegolas4088 ปีที่แล้ว

    For steel not worth. Expensive resource

  • @robertshaver4432
    @robertshaver4432 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate slow turrets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @drakegod84
    @drakegod84 ปีที่แล้ว

    This things garbage. Don't waste your steel

  • @VIPvideoMike
    @VIPvideoMike ปีที่แล้ว

    The 2nd match is exactly why subs are such a trash class.

  • @msamyweber
    @msamyweber ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you talk to much

    • @TimTimONE
      @TimTimONE ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ehm why so negative?

    • @spicy_skywalker6155
      @spicy_skywalker6155 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't watch the video then 🤡

    • @msamyweber
      @msamyweber ปีที่แล้ว

      to address the two replies: 1st - why so negative - because I can be. No one will ever change that. 2nd - why watch - for all his carrying on there is still some good info. Just have to click around the video to find info I want and not all the fluff.

    • @NoName-wi8xz
      @NoName-wi8xz ปีที่แล้ว

      I disagree, i like him talking

    • @msamyweber
      @msamyweber ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NoName-wi8xz Ok, thats you