Construction Basics: Roles and Relationships

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @daniolumuyiwa
    @daniolumuyiwa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been working as a consultant engineer for almost two years now and this is by far the best explanation of how a construction project works.

  • @NasonVSRG
    @NasonVSRG 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Thanks for the simplicity. I am a studying safety management trying to learn more about construction. This was a great start.

  • @TheGuitarNewby
    @TheGuitarNewby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The moment I saw the first frame of the video I immediately knew this is what I was looking for. Excellent video, my friend! Thank you very much.

  • @shantelaiona
    @shantelaiona 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’ve been in construction on the specialty subcontractor side for over 6 years. Your explanation is amazing! Everyone should watch this video that is in construction.

  • @youngaxe6725
    @youngaxe6725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing video! explicit like ever! Thank you so much. You are a great teacher!

  • @feliperomero-garduza6320
    @feliperomero-garduza6320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just starting off my career as a Project Manager and I found this so very helpful. Thanks a lot!

  • @darbypea2223
    @darbypea2223 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you I found this very informative. I've never worked in construction so it's a load off to learn some stuff ahead of time before my pre-apprenticeship

    • @karterdraven3336
      @karterdraven3336 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you all prolly dont give a damn but does anyone know a method to get back into an instagram account??
      I somehow lost my password. I love any help you can give me.

  • @AnDrewKrech
    @AnDrewKrech 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow, great simple content. Great simple presentation. I sped up the play time to 1.5 speed and was thoroughly educated very fast. Saved into my continuing education channel. Blessings

  • @hongganglai3758
    @hongganglai3758 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video illustrating the complex relationships involved in a construction site!

  • @giladwasheretravel3553
    @giladwasheretravel3553 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great and clear explanations. Well produced too. Thank you.

  • @dwipakumeang9023
    @dwipakumeang9023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    really appreciate this video in a way how simply enriching it is. Thanks

  • @storiesforlittlek9944
    @storiesforlittlek9944 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank You! Very helpful!

  • @alexmozmtl
    @alexmozmtl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great info, thanks. Been looking for this kind of video/explanation for a few months.

  • @caliyoopz3293
    @caliyoopz3293 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!! Time well spent

  • @garyrydel5143
    @garyrydel5143 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very easy to understand....Nice job!

  • @Bmywudt2
    @Bmywudt2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the information. It's very helpful. 13:05 example on RFI was just funny

  • @erickmarchand552
    @erickmarchand552 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for explaining this so clear and simply.

  • @MegaMachineboy
    @MegaMachineboy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This lecture is a blessing..

  • @stevejenkins8380
    @stevejenkins8380 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    EXCELLENT explanations!

  • @Drumbum501234
    @Drumbum501234 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thanks

  • @MsCold35
    @MsCold35 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay Minnesota. I enjoyed your lesson. I to am a minnesotan...

  • @RealEyes.Realize.RealLies
    @RealEyes.Realize.RealLies 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx for the very informative video!

  • @devsimiyu
    @devsimiyu ปีที่แล้ว

    Best explanation Sir. Thank you for making it simple

  • @ConstructGTA
    @ConstructGTA ปีที่แล้ว

    Really found this helpful. Thank you very much.

  • @toddthomas751
    @toddthomas751 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rocked it! Great Presentation

  • @dechubasco830
    @dechubasco830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the information !

  • @tcjensenjr
    @tcjensenjr ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thank you!

  • @mightycanuck7762
    @mightycanuck7762 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does Minnesota actually require 6 ft footings? You had stated that was the frost line? Exaggeration or code?

  • @andresgonzalez2064
    @andresgonzalez2064 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful for beginning to understand the construction process. Thanks

  • @sfain7273
    @sfain7273 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is great information !

  • @hadjuntame35
    @hadjuntame35 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing Video. you should keep posting video lectures of construction management.

  • @fadidabban
    @fadidabban 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day sir,
    Would it be ok to approach the architect/ design office after a contract is awarded to present interior fitout accessory products ?

  • @jfjgjghcbvbv6520
    @jfjgjghcbvbv6520 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Helpful‼️

  • @jesusisthetruth8297
    @jesusisthetruth8297 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, this video really really helped, God bless you and Jesus loves you😃

  • @pabli4750
    @pabli4750 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @BillyG869
    @BillyG869 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    RE: Punch Lists, you first make it incumbent on the Installer/Sub/Builder that they need to first send a letter stating that other than the following items the product/Installed work, etc. is completed with exception to the following list...

  • @Africa154
    @Africa154 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video man (:

  • @johnmcmahon1041
    @johnmcmahon1041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great. Business. Program.

  • @Africa154
    @Africa154 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    And thank you!!!

  • @danielkrajnik3817
    @danielkrajnik3817 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    16:46 how many builders does it take to

  • @mohamedsenesienabay1887
    @mohamedsenesienabay1887 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really want to learn this job, please help me,

  • @flyinlo1474
    @flyinlo1474 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!! Very helpful for me beginning to understand the construction process. Only suggestion is toss the gum :)

  • @barankarakose
    @barankarakose 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video!

  • @victoriapearson5321
    @victoriapearson5321 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope that you can assist me. I need to buy software that compares bids side by side and identifies pricing and scope discrepancies, etc.. All suggestions would be appreciated. I only work with contractors who break down their bids. Does Procore have a module that will do this?
    It is overwhelming to analyze bids from 4-5 contractors with 200+ line items in each bid. I am not a construction professional; although, I have hired several contractors in the past few years for both small projects and major residential renovations. So, I am not a newbie and I am very capable using software with a steep learning curve. Thank you.

  • @raymondpang645
    @raymondpang645 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy looks like Procore itself; clean cut hair, simple outfit and colors. Hell, his orange hair is Procore's logo

  • @rolandomcintosh7444
    @rolandomcintosh7444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to get into construction management but I’m from a third world country, Jamaica. If i get a bachelors degree in my country would it still be valid in other countries? Like USA for example

    • @finesse9892
      @finesse9892 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you looked it up yet

  • @fadidabban
    @fadidabban 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also where is the consultant role in this ?

  • @BillyG869
    @BillyG869 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy covers all the variables from experience

  • @i.j.liberty8487
    @i.j.liberty8487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great

  • @DeePreace
    @DeePreace 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sé que tienes hambre, pero voy a comercializar y completar los fondos. Ten un poco de paciencia conmigo, esta es la primera vez que hago esta transacción.

  • @alekajunior
    @alekajunior ปีที่แล้ว

    cool

  • @mashafedorchuk4374
    @mashafedorchuk4374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you explain please the difference between construction company and contractor company. If the company that builds (or it’s better to say construct) real properties also provide contracting services will it be right to call the company CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING COMPANY? And when company should be named only as construction company? Thanks in advance 😊

  • @ratlord667
    @ratlord667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am commenting to say hello

  • @sandracade6965
    @sandracade6965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Okay

  • @thomaschildress911
    @thomaschildress911 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would disagree on the Short Steel analogy. Someone will pay for the crew efficiency decrease. Analyse the schedule impact and pass the cost on with either a claim or change order. No reason for the contractor using contingency with out utilizing the process in place.

  • @gothicskeleton7324
    @gothicskeleton7324 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i’m 15 and i want to start a construction Business

  • @TR-ms9zy
    @TR-ms9zy ปีที่แล้ว

    To clarify… the architect will without a doubt hold up progress

  • @Cheetobob
    @Cheetobob 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i sure hope you don't have plumbers and finishers working at the same time lol.. that would be some poor scheduling

  • @jeg812ify
    @jeg812ify 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does the architect lead over the head engineer. You would think it would be the other way around.

    • @TheGuitarNewby
      @TheGuitarNewby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The Head Engineer would be in charge of all facets of engineering(structural/mechanical design) pertaining to a project. They are more adept at addressing the technical aspects of the project, and delegating the various engineers effectively -- whereas the Architect would be more equipped to assume the role of a Leader, mediating between all the various facets(Contractors, sub-contractors, Local Authority, Regional Administration, Quantity Surveyors) of the construction process.
      From what I gathered in the industry, the Architect articulates the preliminary design of the project to the Employer/Property Owner, along with the Quantity Surveyor's guiding hand, as to ensure optimal fiscal, environmental, and sustainable outcomes for the Property Owner. The Head Engineer would only report to the Architect, Quantity Surveyor, and the Contractors, as to ensure that they are following the overall design, and are completing the works in accordance with the variables set out in the Prime Contract... The Property Owner has little utility for the Structural/Mechanical reports of the Head Engineer, thus they would report to the Architect and the Quantity Surveyor. This line of command would dictate that the Architect assumes a Leadership role, preferably, over a Head Engineer.
      Also, Architects complete modules during the course of their tuition which equips them to manage and mediate between the facets of construction inter-and-intra-personally. This leadership should not be mistaken for a rung among the competency hierarchy, I believe both the Architect and Head Engineer are equally invaluable to a successful project!
      My knowledge on this is admittedly pretty elementary, but that's how I have it. Correct me if I'm wrong!

    • @kittymcpaws4862
      @kittymcpaws4862 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      because the engineer is busy

    • @jasonderby7635
      @jasonderby7635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In simple terms, the architect designs the building so they are responsible for it. The architect is the “professional of record” and is legally responsible for the health, safety, and welfare of a building. As he stated in the video the architect has a contract with the owner, and the general contractor has a contract with the owner. The architect hires structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing engineers as consultants for a project. Technically they work for the architect and not the owner, so that is why they report to the architect. Engineers don’t design buildings, they design components of a building.

    • @cadsux
      @cadsux ปีที่แล้ว

      In California, Contractors need 4 years Journeyman experience, and pass a 2-part test to get GC licensed.
      Engineers need a relevant college degree, min. 4 years experience, and pass 1 test to get PE licensed.
      Architects need a relevant college degree, min. 8 years experience tracked nationally by NCARB, and pass 5 tests to get licensed. Gee, who has the most (legal) responsibility here?

  • @albertoricordi
    @albertoricordi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way engineers and architects are represented in the first 2 minutes of this video is not correct. Architects and landscape architects are indeed responsible for technical aspects of the construction, not design only. Likewise, engineers are very important in the design process. The author of this video probably has no clue of what construction documents and technical specifications are, which are part of every serious construction projects.

    • @finesse9892
      @finesse9892 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What no he just understands that this is for the smoll brain folks who dont want to be engineers but still want construction money 💰

  • @hindisongslover2123
    @hindisongslover2123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Irrelevent video about construction

    • @ramonmoreno3341
      @ramonmoreno3341 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Hindi Songs Lover you are mistaken baby. I am a license contractor. This video is gold.

    • @TheGuitarNewby
      @TheGuitarNewby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I'm a student and I've obtained invaluable guidance from this video... Idk how one could state this is irrelevant, if you've watched the whole video...

  • @solomonmiller563
    @solomonmiller563 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video. I'm a construction management student at my local community college and this helped put things into perspective with a nice flow