We are glade the Dauphin is so pleasant with us....his presents and your pains we thank you.....for I shall keep my state and will show my sail of greatness when I do rouse me in my throne of France....
I felt like I should be laughing during this scene but I found myself entirely unable to even find joy in it. It was pathetic, I just felt uncomfortable watching such a miserable man stumble around in the mud, and the score amplified that feeling. Such an amazing scene
@@GareGix I wouldn't say it was masquerading as a very realistic film. Every time movies respect history you can tell. They are always very very specific about names and dates. This was very Shakespearean and it came across in the tone of the film. I mean even the end with the betrayal, and daggers! Come on.
Pattinson is fearless in his acting. It makes him a chameleon. He's undoubtedly one of the very most talented actors with the greatest range working today. Truly remarkable.
The Dauphin waits until Harold is exhausted before challenging him, which is cowardly but after overseeing the battle and how his armoured knights were mired in the mud, he still keeps his armor on, its the height of stupidity!
Nothing like that. He rejected Hal's challenge of 1on1 battle, believing his army will win. When they didn't, then he re-issued the challenge. Had Hal desired he could have rejected the challenge then and still kept his honor, unlike the Dauphin
@@nomadjensen8276 well it never really happened historically because he was not there...also henry sat on his horse and watched the battle he did not participate lmao
When he swings her perfectly clean sword around to look cool and Henry just looks and picks one of the many old muddy ones from the floor, that in its self was an illustration of the reason of his victory
Yes but Henry had already done his fancy sword swing at the first one-on-one with Percy Hotspur. And then he did it again with the war hammer just before he lead the charge.
Why? Why would that be the reason for his victory? It makes no sense. So the wanting to look cool dude looses because he's "fake cool" unlike the other who's casual and thus "real". TF are you blabbering about??
@@flybeep1661 It's a metaphor, not the literal reason. The dauphin is trying to be intimidating but his armor is spotless, he stayed at the back of the battle and only entered after his men were losing. Henry led the charge and fought the whole battle. He's dirty, muddy and probably exhausted. He grabs his sword out of the mud prepared to finish the job without all of the unnecessary showmanship. Henry has also shed most of his armor because it does nothing but slow him down in the mud. The dauphin is less battle tested and is oblivious to the fact that his armor will hurt him more than it helps him.
I don't think Dauphin was completely incompetent like people are saying. When you look at his opening sword swing and stance you tell see he is very well trained in sword fighting, perhaps better than Henry. His real issue is that he has never been in mud and slop before, and does not know that the flat-bottomed sabatons he is wearing will render him immobile in the mud. He therefore loses due to the massive oversight this inexperience on a real battlefield brings, even though he may very well be more technically competent than Henry in sword fighting.
dauphin probably received formal sword training his entire life in a cushy and safe environment where he wouldn’t be harmed. Henry had first hand experience on the battlefield. To me I think it’s a matter of knowledge vs experience
Lmao so because he does a goofy sword swing and stands with a normal fighting posture you somehow think that points to him being a better fighter? Lmao any child play fighting with a stick could do the exact same thing.
Jeez that would be so terrifying. Once he realized he really wasn't going to be able to get up, he must have been filled with horror, knowing he was going to die
I thought the same thing; "Oh, Shizzle, here it comes!" Then he slips in the mud, slips again, and again...then I thought "Uh oh, that's not good. It's not going to go well for the King of France in his new, clean armour."
It's historically inaccurate, but it's a great piece of symbolism. Henry offered to fight the Dauphin one on one, but because he refused, lots of French and English blood was shed for no reason. It was Henry's men who were dying in his place and the Dauphin's men who were dying in his. That's why Henry looked so disgusted when the Dauphin trounced up in his shiny new armour: hundreds of lives lost because of an arrogant coward who didn't have the courage to spare the men he was leading. So when the ultimate moment comes, Henry just washes his hands of his opponent. The Dauphin wanted his army to fight in his stead, so Henry lets his fight in his. Blood for blood.
But who really was the villain in the story? It was Henry, under false pretenses, who invaded France. Dauphin first comes across as a arrogant scoundrel, but all he was doing was defending his homeland. Ultimately, he was just a victim of English aggression. He didn't ask for this fight.
@@geraldobrien7323 but think about what the French have done before. In the reign of Henry II the king acted in bad faith and tried to help Henry the Young King steal the throne. In the reign of Richard I the king of France urged John to steal the throne, and then stole Normandy from John which was rightfully his. Then, in the reign of Henry III they tried to take England entirely with no blood claim. Then they fought for one-hundred years. At least Henry V had a blood claim.
@@tebo9334 John Lackland died in 1216, literally 200 years before the battle of Agincourt so i don't really see your point here. The 100 years war started in 1337 so more than a century after the death of John Lackland. Btw, it was originally english barons who offered the crown to the french Louis before John Lackland died, and he had a blood claim through his wife as she was the grand-daugther of Henry II.
Basically he refused the one on one combat most likely because he know he’s unexperienced as henry does, since he have more army and henry’s force is outnumbered so he thought that the battle will be won easily
He forgot he had to slow down in Difficult Terrain - especially if you're wearing Heavy Armour. They sent in the Fighter when they should've sent in a Monk or a Rogue.
Right away Henry knew that he didn't deserved to be killed by his sword. He wasn't worthy to fight a king. The way he nods to his men, to take him, that's power.
I dismissed Pattinson as just another wanna be when he was in the Twilight movies. Just watched Tenet on DVD. He did a great job in that movie and a much better actor than I have given credit. He's a major star in the making. He could be the Peter O'Toole of his generation
Both Pattinson and Timothy are major rising stars who may end up owning 2021. (Dune and Batman). Here's hoping so they do. No hate on any other actors but these actors also, deserve the spotlight very much.
The younger sibling wasn’t fit to run the throne. It was the slacker who wanted to be nothing like his father until the younger sibling got killed in combat. It was thus then that a call to action was born in Henry. He always had the leadership.
This scene is great! I like the little cues throughout. The dead knight to the right as the king slips around, in the mud... foreshadowing. The pristine armor the king wears, reflects both his insecurity and inexperience. Genius.
Nah mate, doubt it's foreshadowing. I rather liked there being dead bodies strewn around, as it was the spot of a chaotic battle. It would be unrealistic if they were in a pristine piece. And generally it's wise to not have your commander in the middle of the battle. One wrong move and you'll have a dead king.
Ah but that's life. A bunch of misunderstandings that make your life a whole lot worse when it didn't fuckin have to be. But I understand what you mean. I hate that so much
I don’t think he's completely unskilled. The contrast here is how pristine his armor is compared to Henry's muddy attire. The Dauphin was probably a skilled enough swordsman, but he had only ever fought in courts with marble floor, and never in the mud and grime like Henry has. A king that fights his own battles.
Nah he's definitely not unskilled, he strategically waited for him to be worn out before challenging one on one. He was also outside of battle just like the king is in chess. He was only caught off guard by the ridiculous playing field of a battlefield. His sword skills weren't even shown so how could we know how skilled he was in that department also
There’s a quote from Henry V, the play this is based off: We are but warriors for the working day. It’s just a job. Dophin swags up there doing his swirly shit, Henry picks a random sword from the mud.
Robert Pattinson showed himself to be an all around actor in this movie imo. He has shown supporting character in Harry Potter, main character from Twilight, and with this he shows he can play a villain character. I haven't seen Twilight but I'm sure it proves the point even if it isn't good according to a lot of people.
I don't think this movie lacks in any point everything was on point from acting to soundtrack everything . The scene where the church crowns him and the soundtrack that was goosbumbs moment.
@@Kahanitimes0 The actual history is even better than what happens in the movie. The siege of Harfleur is so lame in the film compared to the real one, so is the battle of Azincourt (seriously, 3-4 arrow volleys into the French and that's it, the real battle is so much more fascinating). The way they depicted Henry is also a lost opportunity, he was already very charismatic and bad-ass, instead they turn him into some sort of Jon Snow archetype. I get why you liked the movie, but I really don't think it's without flaws. I can only appreciate the cinematography, even if it's too dull and gray for the medieval period, and the soundtrack. The plot twist at the end is pretty cool too.
This metaphor rings true, through my experiences working in government. Many of those with the ego and ambitions to lead have those proclivities because they are not smart enough to understand the complexity of the roles they wish to have. This causes the incredible dysfunctions we see in public sector work forces.
man this movie was really good. its the movie that convinced me that pattisons a legit actor. after this and tenet, ive got no issue with him being batman.
I'd like to request that Robert and Timothee star in another film together, because I loved this. I loved them, and even if this film was WILDLY inaccurate, which it totally was - it was a good film
Do you mean inaccurate in terms of historical events? Because I found the world building to otherwise be very accurate - the duels, the way court was held, the politics, etc. All very on point. The inaccuracies I noticed all had to do with changing what happened in real history. For example, this "duel" straight didn't happen in real life, the dauphin refused.
Soldiers around the moment he stepped into the mud and slid : *The heck.......?* Signals for some stabby wabby Soldiers : *um... okay?... Sure i guess*
Imagine being in the middle of a muddy grapple fest for your life right when Dauphin showed up lmao. "AY BRO CHILL, THEY'RE BLOWING THE HORN. TIMEOUT TIMEOUT"
70 year old movie buff checking in. Timothee Chalamet has serious acting chops. However, I humbly believe Pattinson will surpass even Chalamet in the coming years.
I mean, mud was an actual big part of the figts at that time and could be an desiding factor in such fights. So even though the guy is weak and stuff, it is still a bit odd to see this happen to him just becuase he slips and falls in the mud.
0:37 it’s so cool how Henry changes his facial expression at the same time as standing up straight. One minute he’s on the ground with his face strained from battle exhaustion but as soon as he stands up his expression switches back to his stern no-nonsense king face.
Just so you know, anytime you can’t see an actor’s face, and their character is doing anything physical, it is not the actor performing that action; it is what is known as a “stuntman”
@@JFLOJUDO That's not accurate at all. I'll acknowledge that many will use their 'stuntman' but there's still plenty examples of actors doing the physical work themselves.
Yet another moron who doesn’t know the difference between a historical drama and a film adaptation of Shakespeare. It is loosely based on Shakespeare’s Henry IV 1 and 2 and Henry V.
@@aaronmcnally5816 look at it this way: every character in the movie was an actual person. Who played an actual part in actual historical events ....which are the source material. If you consider that , it would appear that both Shakespeare and the makers of this movie only bullshitted , I mean , misrepresented history.
@@Afza1husain who cares if they misrepresented history? They never claimed otherwise, you could say the same for the titanic, or any pirate movie. Entertainment edits history constantly for the sake of entertainment. In history, Dauphin dies of dysentery, that's not a very satisfying end to give a character. Also, lots of characters in this never existed. Shakespeare made Falstaff up entirely. This is a story based on Henry V, not a documentary
A lot of people crapped on this movie for many (understandable) reasons. but goddamn it had a lot to like. This scene is great, that head nod is gangster af. the scene with chalamet and the french king is great. the scene with chalamet and lilly-rose depp is great. people need to ease up a bit I think....though they could have put just a little bit more effort in to historical accuracy...
@@michaelgould3433 Nah man actual armor won't make you sink and slip in mud like that any more than no armor would. It was well made and fitted, and not that heavy (the best armor at least, which the French knights would have been wearing). At Azincourt the mud slowed the French advance long enough to give many opportunities to the English archers, and once they reached the English line, many of them were wounded and exhausted. They initially planned to send the cavalry on the flanks to take care of the archers, but couldn't because Henry was smart enough to place his archers around the muddy battlefield protected by the tree line.
@@haaxeu6501 I grew up on a farm in England where the ground is often heavy and clay. It can be difficult to walk in even in light clothes.. God knows what it would be like in armour.
When the people leading the armies actually fought. Now they sit behind a desk and collect medals while tossing their soldiers lives away like garbage.
I am sure most of you realize that this never happened. I am continually shocked of how history is completely changed in movies. The true history is so breathtaking why change it?
Also they would never have killed him like that, he would be worth an unbelievable amount of ransom money, your basically stabbing a sack full of blank check's.
This scene is actually historically accurate in its own way. The Dauphin died of dysentery, which meant he was full of shit... In the film he dies... Full of shit.
@@camiloordonez4906 Shakespear would have known as well as anyone that killing the Dauphine like that is the equivalent of throwing a giant sack of gold into the sea. Only 90 years earlier the British Captured the French King, and nearly bankrupted all of France from the ransom they got for his return (Which incidentally is where the title Dauphine came from, since France was missing its king for a long time, they had to invent a steward position) The British were eager to repeat a similar feat through the 100 years war, and the capture of the Dauphine would have been just that.
There were many important factors at play, the terrain, the weather, impetuous French advancement, the woods on both flanks, the funnel shape of the battlefield which basically caused a crowd disaster. The Longbowman were definitely a great asset, but their arrows would have been used up fairly quickly. Most of the actual fighting was melee.
If this is Agincourt, there is an extraordinary link to today. At the Coronation of King Charles III, Charles wore two crowns. He was actually crowned with St Edward's Crown, but at the end of the service, in the procession and balcony appearance, he wore the lighter Imperial State Crown. This Crown dates from 1838, but many of its jewels are older. About 1910, a giant diamond ( Star of Africa No 2) was onto the front, but that diamond is pleasantly contrasted with a large uncut red stone above it. Our heir to the throne, Edward of Woodstock, Prince of Wales, fought the Battle of Najera in Spain in 1367 on behalf of Pedro the Cruel, King of Castile. But Pedro didn't pay him! All Edward got was a few jewels, including this red spinel. Because Edward once wore black armour at a tournament, this stone is referred to as the 'Black Prince's Ruby'. (Which technically it isn't) Anyway, Henry V had a battle-helm, obviously rather splendid with a coronet round it. In the coronet was this 'ruby'. So what his men - and the French - saw at Agincourt, we saw the other day.
I wonder why everyone hates Daulphin and insults him. In the end it was just a lie by Henry's advisor that he wanted to insult him with the gift, and so on. I feel more sorry for him and for france in general.
The Dolphin had his chance at single combat but refused. He only accepted because the battle was lost. Henry was entirely correct in letting his men butcher him instead.
It was not that the killing of Dauphin was beneath him....Henry had showed he was true too his word ...he was one of them...covered in the same mud /blood.....his nod too his men was almost a gift....
I think this whole scene is a metaphor for the battle that just took place - nobility, technical proficiency and 'honorable' battle vs. praticality, strategy and the sheer nastiness of war. Though it's a strong scene it's a bit cringe for me with how the French prince is portrayed here, reminds me of the vomiting, crawling English prince in Robert De Bruce, bit heavy handed even disrespectful.
This movie is a shame, a shit launch on the history face. In reality, the Dauphin never was at this battle and never met Henry V... he died really young (18 years old) and was sick all his life. This movie is a lie all the long
@@GareGix It's called dramatic license! Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. I think you'll find most historical movies deviate from the 'actual happening'. They don't want to bore their audience :) I disagree with it 'being one long lie' though. Much is actual factual.
I wore a full plated armor once, chainmail, quilt underneath. Everything. None of you know what terror is being out of breath and the "helmet fear" kicking in. Every second is agony, for anyone who knows what that is, imagine being under 4-5 people all fully plated crushing you and the fear kicks in, I'm getting a cold sweat just imagining it.
Me, ten years ago: "Robert Pattison is a great actor" Everyone else: 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Me, today: 'Robert Pattison is... " Everyone else: " Alright Alright... you win... we were completely wrong... he definitely deserves an oscar!" 🙄
Honestly i feel like a sword is pointless. It will simply glide along the armor and chainmail. Use a Warpick or Hammer instead. The pick would smash through the armor like a can opener. And the hammer side would give the guy a concussion and then you can just keep bashing.
@@FaithfulOfBrigantia Its for sure the best weapon for this time period. Unless the enemy is a leather armored archer or a peasant with nothing, THEN a sword would be fine. But with super heavy armor like that, a sword is useless unless you can magically get it up into their armpit or groin or eye slits.
This was awful, from every angle you look at it, historical, adaption of Shakespeare to entertainment it failed on those metrics the majority of the time, the only bit i quite liked was when Henry met the French King and some of the armour is pretty good but that's about it.
I like how the daulphins armor is in perfect condition as if unused. Really illustrates how inexperienced and incompetent he is.
@Mitch Ddhfacetyy ur mom
@Mitch Ddhfacetyy U can’t talk to JUSTIN BIEBER like that
@@antzzors126 Actually we can.
We are glade the Dauphin is so pleasant with us....his presents and your pains we thank you.....for I shall keep my state and will show my sail of greatness when I do rouse me in my throne of France....
@@justinbieber8028 Eww Justin Bieber 🤮
I felt like I should be laughing during this scene but I found myself entirely unable to even find joy in it. It was pathetic, I just felt uncomfortable watching such a miserable man stumble around in the mud, and the score amplified that feeling. Such an amazing scene
I must be evil then because I laughed my ass off and had to rewind it
yeah, it was unpleasant, but more unpleasant was how inaccurate it really was.
Since it's based on an English play I'd take the accuracy of this moment with a grain of salt.
Yeah it made me feel uncomfortable as well
@@DngrDan Not evil. Immature is more like it.
I love how Timothee throws down his sword, and nods to his people. “He’s all yours.”
It’s as if killing the dauphin himself is beneath him.
Would have done the same to that child murderer.
In reality, the dauphin was never at this battle and never meet Henry V.... typical absurd french bashing...
@@GareGix What do you expect, its Netflix.
@@Nikeel_A.W yes but i dislike a lot when a film pretends to be historic and propagates lies inspired by Shakespear fictions
@@GareGix I wouldn't say it was masquerading as a very realistic film. Every time movies respect history you can tell. They are always very very specific about names and dates.
This was very Shakespearean and it came across in the tone of the film. I mean even the end with the betrayal, and daggers! Come on.
Pattinson is fearless in his acting. It makes him a chameleon. He's undoubtedly one of the very most talented actors with the greatest range working today. Truly remarkable.
Yeah he played his character amazingly
You are god damn right! I dont understand ppl comment here like "haha pathetic Edward in mud." He is talented actor.
@KD6-3. 7 Very constructive.
@@epikoperfectnoob6408 I've seen almost everything he's acted in... Can't wait for Batman!
We will see after the new Batman comes out. I really think he has stepped his game up a lot and has come along way since Harry Potter and twilight...
The Dauphin waits until Harold is exhausted before challenging him, which is cowardly but after overseeing the battle and how his armoured knights were mired in the mud, he still keeps his armor on, its the height of stupidity!
Nothing like that. He rejected Hal's challenge of 1on1 battle, believing his army will win. When they didn't, then he re-issued the challenge. Had Hal desired he could have rejected the challenge then and still kept his honor, unlike the Dauphin
Still he lost 😂😂. If not for Robert Pattinson the charectrr has no other redeeming qualities.
just goes to show you that despite the training that he got in swordsmanship, he knew nothing about real battle.
@@nomadjensen8276 well it never really happened historically because he was not there...also henry sat on his horse and watched the battle he did not participate lmao
@@jacobbridges8900 that's not true.
When he swings her perfectly clean sword around to look cool and Henry just looks and picks one of the many old muddy ones from the floor, that in its self was an illustration of the reason of his victory
Yes but Henry had already done his fancy sword swing at the first one-on-one with Percy Hotspur. And then he did it again with the war hammer just before he lead the charge.
Why? Why would that be the reason for his victory? It makes no sense. So the wanting to look cool dude looses because he's "fake cool" unlike the other who's casual and thus "real". TF are you blabbering about??
@@flybeep1661 It’s a metaphor for the type of men they are, not literal
@@flybeep1661 It's a metaphor, not the literal reason. The dauphin is trying to be intimidating but his armor is spotless, he stayed at the back of the battle and only entered after his men were losing. Henry led the charge and fought the whole battle. He's dirty, muddy and probably exhausted. He grabs his sword out of the mud prepared to finish the job without all of the unnecessary showmanship. Henry has also shed most of his armor because it does nothing but slow him down in the mud. The dauphin is less battle tested and is oblivious to the fact that his armor will hurt him more than it helps him.
i like how the french guy plays the english king and the english guy the french prince
Iiin West Montpellier born and raised, in the vinyards is where I spent most of my da-...wait
Yes, Chalamet has French citizenship - but he was born in NYC, USA...
@@CaptainSeato so? he’s still french and speaks french... He also constantly visits france.
I immediately read that last sentence as, "Fresh Prince." 🤣
@@britt5348 You're absolutely right, he's still American by birth.
The way he buried his sword on the ground, backs up, and gives his men the nod is so gangster.
I don't think Dauphin was completely incompetent like people are saying. When you look at his opening sword swing and stance you tell see he is very well trained in sword fighting, perhaps better than Henry. His real issue is that he has never been in mud and slop before, and does not know that the flat-bottomed sabatons he is wearing will render him immobile in the mud. He therefore loses due to the massive oversight this inexperience on a real battlefield brings, even though he may very well be more technically competent than Henry in sword fighting.
dauphin probably received formal sword training his entire life in a cushy and safe environment where he wouldn’t be harmed. Henry had first hand experience on the battlefield. To me I think it’s a matter of knowledge vs experience
@@theunsmartasian1087 Well said!
Great analysis!
He was too high-class. Wanted the glory but not to get his hands dirty
Lmao so because he does a goofy sword swing and stands with a normal fighting posture you somehow think that points to him being a better fighter? Lmao any child play fighting with a stick could do the exact same thing.
Jeez that would be so terrifying. Once he realized he really wasn't going to be able to get up, he must have been filled with horror, knowing he was going to die
Idk, I'd be laughing my ass off even at my imminent death. What a stupid place to fight a battle on.
When I watched this scene for the first time I genuinely thought an epic final battle would go down lol
I was kinda expecting him to fail miserably since he was acting way too cocky but not like this lmao!
Yeah, after he closed his helmet he swing his sword like a pro couple of times. With such an epic sound.
Seems knights of that time underestimated the power of mud.
@@mannylugz5872 This thing between the Dauphin and Henry is a fiction... The Dauphan even didn't there at Agincourt in reality...
I thought the same thing; "Oh, Shizzle, here it comes!" Then he slips in the mud, slips again, and again...then I thought "Uh oh, that's not good. It's not going to go well for the King of France in his new, clean armour."
It's historically inaccurate, but it's a great piece of symbolism. Henry offered to fight the Dauphin one on one, but because he refused, lots of French and English blood was shed for no reason.
It was Henry's men who were dying in his place and the Dauphin's men who were dying in his. That's why Henry looked so disgusted when the Dauphin trounced up in his shiny new armour: hundreds of lives lost because of an arrogant coward who didn't have the courage to spare the men he was leading.
So when the ultimate moment comes, Henry just washes his hands of his opponent. The Dauphin wanted his army to fight in his stead, so Henry lets his fight in his. Blood for blood.
But who really was the villain in the story? It was Henry, under false pretenses, who invaded France. Dauphin first comes across as a arrogant scoundrel, but all he was doing was defending his homeland. Ultimately, he was just a victim of English aggression. He didn't ask for this fight.
@@geraldobrien7323 but think about what the French have done before. In the reign of Henry II the king acted in bad faith and tried to help Henry the Young King steal the throne. In the reign of Richard I the king of France urged John to steal the throne, and then stole Normandy from John which was rightfully his. Then, in the reign of Henry III they tried to take England entirely with no blood claim. Then they fought for one-hundred years.
At least Henry V had a blood claim.
@@tebo9334 John Lackland died in 1216, literally 200 years before the battle of Agincourt so i don't really see your point here. The 100 years war started in 1337 so more than a century after the death of John Lackland. Btw, it was originally english barons who offered the crown to the french Louis before John Lackland died, and he had a blood claim through his wife as she was the grand-daugther of Henry II.
Basically he refused the one on one combat most likely because he know he’s unexperienced as henry does, since he have more army and henry’s force is outnumbered so he thought that the battle will be won easily
E olha que o Delfim era uma pessoa bem tímida e normal e não esse babaca monstro 😕
When he maxxed agility but still fails his check and you maxxed charisma
Maxed agility, but not one damn point to handed weapon yielding.
This is not a place I expected a Fate reference...
He forgot he had to slow down in Difficult Terrain - especially if you're wearing Heavy Armour. They sent in the Fighter when they should've sent in a Monk or a Rogue.
Right away Henry knew that he didn't deserved to be killed by his sword. He wasn't worthy to fight a king. The way he nods to his men, to take him, that's power.
Really enjoyed this film- great little gem on Netflix
Süper Netflix
raboninco.com/vbOJ
Süper Netflix Altyazılar
raboninco.com/vcE3
This movie is an historic shame, all details are lies, please learn real facts
@@GareGix I didn't watch it as a source of education, but for entertainment.
Me too. Really enjoyed it
@@GareGix sit down frenchie
I love that when daulphin falls in the mud, nobody laughs at him, they are too tired for this shit.
I dismissed Pattinson as just another wanna be when he was in the Twilight movies. Just watched Tenet on DVD. He did a great job in that movie and a much better actor than I have given credit. He's a major star in the making. He could be the Peter O'Toole of his generation
Watch Good Time
Both Pattinson and Timothy are major rising stars who may end up owning 2021. (Dune and Batman).
Here's hoping so they do. No hate on any other actors but these actors also, deserve the spotlight very much.
hes 1 of those talented actors whos big breakthrough ended up being a movie like Twilight unfortunately
He was the best character in Tenet. That’s taking nothing from John David Washington. Robbie is just good.
The Lighthouse as well.
The head nod is just too good.
Probably the only realistic medieval fighting scene in popular cinema
The younger sibling wasn’t fit to run the throne. It was the slacker who wanted to be nothing like his father until the younger sibling got killed in combat. It was thus then that a call to action was born in Henry. He always had the leadership.
Soundtrack in this movie is just something else.
This film made me love Nicholas Britell as a composer. I think he's up and coming and he did the astounding soundtrack for Andor as well.
I did not expect that. Honestly thought Pattinson would of one-shot him. I can say I was pleasantly surprised.
What EXACTLY does WOULD OF mean? Of what?
@@Cukito4 would have*^ I’m only human
I love Timmy, I love how he acted, give us more Timmy's movies
This scene is great! I like the little cues throughout. The dead knight to the right as the king slips around, in the mud... foreshadowing. The pristine armor the king wears, reflects both his insecurity and inexperience. Genius.
Nah mate, doubt it's foreshadowing. I rather liked there being dead bodies strewn around, as it was the spot of a chaotic battle. It would be unrealistic if they were in a pristine piece. And generally it's wise to not have your commander in the middle of the battle. One wrong move and you'll have a dead king.
you cannot forshadow things that happen in the same scene lol
you guys are right, sure, but if Michael had to write an english essay on this scene he'd be the one getting full marks.
Les imbecile.
That was effing funny! A fortune in armor and training and it's the mud that fells him.
always mind your surroundings - henri ducard/ra's al ghul
That sword flourish by the Dauphin gets funnier when he slips and falls in the mud
It's sad knowing all this could've been avoided if they found out the traitor
Ah but that's life. A bunch of misunderstandings that make your life a whole lot worse when it didn't fuckin have to be. But I understand what you mean. I hate that so much
@@ismeneedecaste3592 Based realist.
Ce la vie
Yes but that the whole point of the movie, even his sister warned him so he dont trust nobody
And then there would be no story.
The dark knight
Süper Netflix
raboninco.com/vbOJ
Süper Netflix Altyazılar
raboninco.com/vcE3
The Dark Knight -Rises-
this kid timothee-wow,what an actor
I don’t think he's completely unskilled. The contrast here is how pristine his armor is compared to Henry's muddy attire. The Dauphin was probably a skilled enough swordsman, but he had only ever fought in courts with marble floor, and never in the mud and grime like Henry has. A king that fights his own battles.
Nah he's definitely not unskilled, he strategically waited for him to be worn out before challenging one on one. He was also outside of battle just like the king is in chess. He was only caught off guard by the ridiculous playing field of a battlefield. His sword skills weren't even shown so how could we know how skilled he was in that department also
French guy would've won the fight because my ass would've died from laughing so hard.
French guy did win lol
What movie you watch?
@@eutropius2699 Robert Pattinson was the French guy and he definitely didn't win lol
@@kelise001 Yes but the king is a french actor xD
So its all ironic
There’s a quote from Henry V, the play this is based off:
We are but warriors for the working day.
It’s just a job. Dophin swags up there doing his swirly shit, Henry picks a random sword from the mud.
Thank you for being one of the few ppl here who know this is based on a play. So tired of the "this isn't factual" whining. It's not supposed to be!
What a fantastic scene. I don't get tired of watching it
It just proves again that some bullies talk better than they fight.
Damn Neil REALLY went far back in time
lmao exactly what I thought
Robert Pattinson showed himself to be an all around actor in this movie imo. He has shown supporting character in Harry Potter, main character from Twilight, and with this he shows he can play a villain character. I haven't seen Twilight but I'm sure it proves the point even if it isn't good according to a lot of people.
check out "good time"
@@conchitacaparroz The Lighthouse, Lost City of Z, Tenet too.
I don't think this movie lacks in any point everything was on point from acting to soundtrack everything . The scene where the church crowns him and the soundtrack that was goosbumbs moment.
the sound design and cinematography in the scene where they siege the first castle they encounter in France is phenomenal.
the only think lacking is actual historical accuracy instead of plain french bashing
@@Sullian_dF I mean they gotta alter the history so that it can fit into the movie . It was about the king and how well he handled his crown .
@@Kahanitimes0 The actual history is even better than what happens in the movie. The siege of Harfleur is so lame in the film compared to the real one, so is the battle of Azincourt (seriously, 3-4 arrow volleys into the French and that's it, the real battle is so much more fascinating).
The way they depicted Henry is also a lost opportunity, he was already very charismatic and bad-ass, instead they turn him into some sort of Jon Snow archetype. I get why you liked the movie, but I really don't think it's without flaws. I can only appreciate the cinematography, even if it's too dull and gray for the medieval period, and the soundtrack.
The plot twist at the end is pretty cool too.
Beginning was slow af
This metaphor rings true, through my experiences working in government. Many of those with the ego and ambitions to lead have those proclivities because they are not smart enough to understand the complexity of the roles they wish to have. This causes the incredible dysfunctions we see in public sector work forces.
This is just a great movie and deserves many Oscars
man this movie was really good. its the movie that convinced me that pattisons a legit actor. after this and tenet, ive got no issue with him being batman.
I thought I'd hate Batman, but goddamn, what a great movie.
😂😂😂 didn’t see that coming
I'd like to request that Robert and Timothee star in another film together, because I loved this. I loved them, and even if this film was WILDLY inaccurate, which it totally was - it was a good film
Pattinson would be a choice pick for Feyd Rautha in the Dune sequel.
Do you mean inaccurate in terms of historical events? Because I found the world building to otherwise be very accurate - the duels, the way court was held, the politics, etc. All very on point. The inaccuracies I noticed all had to do with changing what happened in real history. For example, this "duel" straight didn't happen in real life, the dauphin refused.
@@SilentTree12 I wouldnt know. I dont like Dune, but if you say he is then he must be
Soldiers around the moment he stepped into the mud and slid : *The heck.......?*
Signals for some stabby wabby
Soldiers : *um... okay?... Sure i guess*
Definitely one of my top Netflix Original films.
Definitely
cause englih won one battle ? lol if you need a fiction for trip your ego
"It's just a flesh wound"
"YOUR ARM'S OFF!"
I love that little nod.
This is really one of the fights of all time in the movie history.
Imagine being in the middle of a muddy grapple fest for your life right when Dauphin showed up lmao.
"AY BRO CHILL, THEY'RE BLOWING THE HORN. TIMEOUT TIMEOUT"
*starts tapping out* BRO YOU DIDNT HEAR THE HORN?!?
When Batman fought Paul Atreides
2:12 - Footage of me playing Dark Souls
Killing a man who can't even stand on his feet his beneath him
I hope nobody thinks this is actually how Agincourt happened....
Don't worry, i don't.
Some people definitely do
1:19 i really like the sword flip
It's like when a martial artist with no pressure testing fights a real street fighter.
Me too man bros dangerous
70 year old movie buff checking in. Timothee Chalamet has serious acting chops. However, I humbly believe Pattinson will surpass even Chalamet in the coming years.
This scene is so tuff the way he’s just standing over him like “Yeah you ain’t really out in these trenches boy I DO THIS” 🗣️🗣️
I mean, mud was an actual big part of the figts at that time and could be an desiding factor in such fights. So even though the guy is weak and stuff, it is still a bit odd to see this happen to him just becuase he slips and falls in the mud.
The best fighting scene in cinematic history! TWIST! 🤣
0:37 it’s so cool how Henry changes his facial expression at the same time as standing up straight. One minute he’s on the ground with his face strained from battle exhaustion but as soon as he stands up his expression switches back to his stern no-nonsense king face.
"Get up, Prince of France. Get up ! I won't let a mud take my glory."
Dead😂😂
Yes! Just yes!
@Sir Drewgood one cap 😁
This whole movie felt like an audition reel for Dune
I know it’s not meant to be funny but I always laugh at 1:20 when big Pats swings his sword.
Dude just sighs like, "Alright. Guess I still have one more ass left to kick before I can actually sit mine down for five minutes."
Just so you know, anytime you can’t see an actor’s face, and their character is doing anything physical, it is not the actor performing that action; it is what is known as a “stuntman”
@@JFLOJUDO That's not accurate at all. I'll acknowledge that many will use their 'stuntman' but there's still plenty examples of actors doing the physical work themselves.
@@TeamLNE yes that is when the actor’s face is visible
@@JFLOJUDO Again, no. Not always.
1:40 "Always mind your surroundings!"
you haven't beaten me... you've sacrificed sure footing for a killing strike.
He didn’t fight Timothee though so..
Ah . A glorious historical event. That never happened.
Good movie though
It's Shakespeare
Yet another moron who doesn’t know the difference between a historical drama and a film adaptation of Shakespeare. It is loosely based on Shakespeare’s Henry IV 1 and 2 and Henry V.
@@aaronmcnally5816 look at it this way: every character in the movie was an actual person. Who played an actual part in actual historical events ....which are the source material. If you consider that , it would appear that both Shakespeare and the makers of this movie only bullshitted , I mean , misrepresented history.
@@Afza1husain who cares if they misrepresented history? They never claimed otherwise, you could say the same for the titanic, or any pirate movie. Entertainment edits history constantly for the sake of entertainment.
In history, Dauphin dies of dysentery, that's not a very satisfying end to give a character. Also, lots of characters in this never existed. Shakespeare made Falstaff up entirely.
This is a story based on Henry V, not a documentary
@@Afza1husain you are very confused. This movie is based on a work of FICTION!
His body guards didn’t even try to save him
How Batman in medieval died lol
I am vengeance.
French prince didn't die in the battle of Agincourt
A lot of people crapped on this movie for many (understandable) reasons. but goddamn it had a lot to like. This scene is great, that head nod is gangster af. the scene with chalamet and the french king is great. the scene with chalamet and lilly-rose depp is great. people need to ease up a bit I think....though they could have put just a little bit more effort in to historical accuracy...
It was just a Netflix film,not a lesson in history class. That is the thing most people here forget.
@@Londongirl666 people are dumb
@@Londongirl666 Yeah I agree people shouldn’t completely trash it. However, it wouldn’t hurt to be at least a bit accurate.
Well this is new too me, I never thought that mud could save your life from a juggernaut
You weren't at Agincourt.
@@michaelgould3433 Nah man actual armor won't make you sink and slip in mud like that any more than no armor would. It was well made and fitted, and not that heavy (the best armor at least, which the French knights would have been wearing).
At Azincourt the mud slowed the French advance long enough to give many opportunities to the English archers, and once they reached the English line, many of them were wounded and exhausted.
They initially planned to send the cavalry on the flanks to take care of the archers, but couldn't because Henry was smart enough to place his archers around the muddy battlefield protected by the tree line.
@@haaxeu6501
I grew up on a farm in England where the ground is often heavy and clay. It can be difficult to walk in even in light clothes.. God knows what it would be like in armour.
When the people leading the armies actually fought. Now they sit behind a desk and collect medals while tossing their soldiers lives away like garbage.
Wow.
They did the same shit back then, don't let Hollywood cloud yourself lol
There are people who fight along those they lead and people who sit behind desks and through lives away in all eras.
I am sure most of you realize that this never happened. I am continually shocked of how history is completely changed in movies. The true history is so breathtaking why change it?
Cool scene... too bad it never happened. The Dauphin (Louis, Duke of Guyenne) was not at the battle. He died of dysentery later in the year.
Also they would never have killed him like that, he would be worth an unbelievable amount of ransom money, your basically stabbing a sack full of blank check's.
This scene is actually historically accurate in its own way. The Dauphin died of dysentery, which meant he was full of shit... In the film he dies... Full of shit.
@@tekelupharsin4426 haha that's certainly an interesting interpretation!!
As far as I know, this isn't based in any historical source but Henry V the Shakespeare play
@@camiloordonez4906 Shakespear would have known as well as anyone that killing the Dauphine like that is the equivalent of throwing a giant sack of gold into the sea. Only 90 years earlier the British Captured the French King, and nearly bankrupted all of France from the ransom they got for his return
(Which incidentally is where the title Dauphine came from, since France was missing its king for a long time, they had to invent a steward position)
The British were eager to repeat a similar feat through the 100 years war, and the capture of the Dauphine would have been just that.
I think Robert Pattinson enjoyed playing the over-the-top villian.
Best fight in the history of cinematography
When you put too many points in charisma and none in weight capacity
In real life both sides wore full plate and the English won mostly due to the strategic use of their archers.
This
Longbow ftw
There were many important factors at play, the terrain, the weather, impetuous French advancement, the woods on both flanks, the funnel shape of the battlefield which basically caused a crowd disaster. The Longbowman were definitely a great asset, but their arrows would have been used up fairly quickly. Most of the actual fighting was melee.
If this is Agincourt, there is an extraordinary link to today. At the Coronation of King Charles III, Charles wore two crowns. He was actually crowned with St Edward's Crown, but at the end of the service, in the procession and balcony appearance, he wore the lighter Imperial State Crown. This Crown dates from 1838, but many of its jewels are older. About 1910, a giant diamond ( Star of Africa No 2) was onto the front, but that diamond is pleasantly contrasted with a large uncut red stone above it.
Our heir to the throne, Edward of Woodstock, Prince of Wales, fought the Battle of Najera in Spain in 1367 on behalf of Pedro the Cruel, King of Castile. But Pedro didn't pay him! All Edward got was a few jewels, including this red spinel. Because Edward once wore black armour at a tournament, this stone is referred to as the 'Black Prince's Ruby'. (Which technically it isn't)
Anyway, Henry V had a battle-helm, obviously rather splendid with a coronet round it. In the coronet was this 'ruby'. So what his men - and the French - saw at Agincourt, we saw the other day.
I wonder why everyone hates Daulphin and insults him. In the end it was just a lie by Henry's advisor that he wanted to insult him with the gift, and so on. I feel more sorry for him and for france in general.
A general chooses his ground wisely.
Yes he does
Yes sir
Very underrated scene and acting
The Dolphin had his chance at single combat but refused. He only accepted because the battle was lost. Henry was entirely correct in letting his men butcher him instead.
Bro fliped that sword hard…
Dang that was awesome. I need to watch this movie.
They keep trying to make Chalamet an action star but he's a stick figure manlet. Cmon man
"Fights" would be an awfully strong word to describe this.
It was not that the killing of Dauphin was beneath him....Henry had showed he was true too his word ...he was one of them...covered in the same mud /blood.....his nod too his men was almost a gift....
I think this whole scene is a metaphor for the battle that just took place - nobility, technical proficiency and 'honorable' battle vs. praticality, strategy and the sheer nastiness of war. Though it's a strong scene it's a bit cringe for me with how the French prince is portrayed here, reminds me of the vomiting, crawling English prince in Robert De Bruce, bit heavy handed even disrespectful.
Love the Henriad. This film is like a treat for me after reading through it.
One of the best film of 2020
This movie is a shame, a shit launch on the history face. In reality, the Dauphin never was at this battle and never met Henry V... he died really young (18 years old) and was sick all his life. This movie is a lie all the long
@@GareGix It's called dramatic license! Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. I think you'll find most historical movies deviate from the 'actual happening'. They don't want to bore their audience :) I disagree with it 'being one long lie' though. Much is actual factual.
This scene was so good.
Well, that was a rather inglorious end! LOL!
When your opponent rolls a 1 on his attack roll.
I wore a full plated armor once, chainmail, quilt underneath. Everything. None of you know what terror is being out of breath and the "helmet fear" kicking in. Every second is agony, for anyone who knows what that is, imagine being under 4-5 people all fully plated crushing you and the fear kicks in, I'm getting a cold sweat just imagining it.
Note to self, add some cleats to armor.
Me, ten years ago: "Robert Pattison is a great actor"
Everyone else: 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Me, today: 'Robert Pattison is... "
Everyone else: " Alright Alright... you win... we were completely wrong... he definitely deserves an oscar!" 🙄
Then they watch Tenet. Damn.. Robert is a good actor.
The king let his men take on the Prince because he feared his drunken master style of combat.
1:24 he just eminates a lot of "bruh" aura here
Honestly i feel like a sword is pointless. It will simply glide along the armor and chainmail. Use a Warpick or Hammer instead. The pick would smash through the armor like a can opener. And the hammer side would give the guy a concussion and then you can just keep bashing.
War Hammers include a pick.
Henry was using a Warhammer earlier in the fight.
@@FaithfulOfBrigantia Its for sure the best weapon for this time period. Unless the enemy is a leather armored archer or a peasant with nothing, THEN a sword would be fine. But with super heavy armor like that, a sword is useless unless you can magically get it up into their armpit or groin or eye slits.
We need more stuff like this netflix!
This was awful, from every angle you look at it, historical, adaption of Shakespeare to entertainment it failed on those metrics the majority of the time, the only bit i quite liked was when Henry met the French King and some of the armour is pretty good but that's about it.
Admit it, Henry V had insane aura.