Thanks for making this fantastic video! Great playing, and great explanation. I expect that model could sound better. If you're open to it, I'd love to check out your reamp and see if there's anything I can tweak to squeeze more juice out of the training for everyone. Get in touch!
🙏🏼 Yes! I definitely feel like I messed something up along the way here. I am in the FB group now, so I'll message you there. Thanks for offering to help, and GREAT work on NAM! (also, great playing on your channel too 🤘🏻🤘🏻)
Hey dude very nice content. Just saying, your channel has that high quality that it is set up to attract more and more viewers in the long run:) Keep doing what your doing, good stuff!
Nice work! I wonder if your NAM capture has 2 IRs applied as it sounds a bit strange and not as open and direct as your FM9 tones. In my tests with the Kemper It was spot on.
Thanks! It’s good to hear you had better results, that makes me want to keep digging and figure what I probably did wrong here. Did you re-amp analog or via usb? Did you tweak the levels of the test signal? Did you train for 100 epochs or longer? Sorry too many questions. :)
New Subscriber here. I like what you are doing and enjoyed your presentation and how you communicate. God bless. I look forward to hearing more from you. I am a Quad Cortex user and play at church most weekends through the PA system.
Great video!Could you test also the new plug in called AIDA-X? Also free and they have the option to add it in the MOD Dwarf pedal. It is a game changer for me!
I am recording via usb on the FM9. I can record the raw input and main outs simultaneously, and then switch to using one of the usb inputs for re-amping.
I feel the opposite about the hi gain tones being hard to clone thing. There are tons of great and convincing sounding high gain amp profiles everywhere on the internet and less clean to edge of breakup stuff that does a good job in capturing the nuances of say a Dumble or a Vox or a Bassman
So am I right to think that to use it you need to first have some amps of your own?Or you need a friend in music store and his amps to be able to use it?
You have to model something, yes! I think the consensus of the NAM community is, out of courtesy, to only model stuff you own. I think that's a great policy, personally. The models are fair game to share though, once modeled. There's a sort of official Facebook group where users are sharing their models, if you want to try something out!
Thanks for making this fantastic video! Great playing, and great explanation.
I expect that model could sound better. If you're open to it, I'd love to check out your reamp and see if there's anything I can tweak to squeeze more juice out of the training for everyone. Get in touch!
🙏🏼 Yes! I definitely feel like I messed something up along the way here. I am in the FB group now, so I'll message you there. Thanks for offering to help, and GREAT work on NAM! (also, great playing on your channel too 🤘🏻🤘🏻)
Hey dude very nice content. Just saying, your channel has that high quality that it is set up to attract more and more viewers in the long run:) Keep doing what your doing, good stuff!
I appreciate that! 🙏🏼 🤘🏻
Nice work! I wonder if your NAM capture has 2 IRs applied as it sounds a bit strange and not as open and direct as your FM9 tones. In my tests with the Kemper It was spot on.
Thanks! It’s good to hear you had better results, that makes me want to keep digging and figure what I probably did wrong here. Did you re-amp analog or via usb? Did you tweak the levels of the test signal? Did you train for 100 epochs or longer? Sorry too many questions. :)
@@bradspaulding there is a reamping checklist in that group :) I used spdif with my Kemper 😂
New Subscriber here. I like what you are doing and enjoyed your presentation and how you communicate. God bless. I look forward to hearing more from you. I am a Quad Cortex user and play at church most weekends through the PA system.
🤘🏼🙏🏼 Thanks, I appreciate it!
3:00 sounds exactly like the kind of music I play! :)
😂😂😂🤘🏼
The high end peaks are in different frequencies.
Great video!Could you test also the new plug in called AIDA-X? Also free and they have the option to add it in the MOD Dwarf pedal. It is a game changer for me!
Thanks! I’ll check it out, I hadn’t heard about that one yet!
will you be sharing the .nam file you used in the video? that sounded really good
Yes! Sorry it took so long, link in description.
@@bradspaulding awesome! Thanks
Is there a way you can explain how you record the amp? Are you plugging it in directly to interface? Sorry I'm very new to this.
I am recording via usb on the FM9. I can record the raw input and main outs simultaneously, and then switch to using one of the usb inputs for re-amping.
Maybe adding an aural exciter on Nam Version, but make it with a real amp and hi gain stuff, clean is easy to clone.
I dig that, I'm not into high gain stuff as much myself, but I can see how a Vox style thing would be boring if you weren't into that. :)
I feel the opposite about the hi gain tones being hard to clone thing. There are tons of great and convincing sounding high gain amp profiles everywhere on the internet and less clean to edge of breakup stuff that does a good job in capturing the nuances of say a Dumble or a Vox or a Bassman
@@ethagr8162 I see, but I complete disagree, try the Tone King Imperial MKII from Neural DSP and let me know, Cheers!
So am I right to think that to use it you need to first have some amps of your own?Or you need a friend in music store and his amps to be able to use it?
You have to model something, yes! I think the consensus of the NAM community is, out of courtesy, to only model stuff you own. I think that's a great policy, personally. The models are fair game to share though, once modeled. There's a sort of official Facebook group where users are sharing their models, if you want to try something out!
Amazing! Thanks for a great video. Liked & Subbed 👍😃
🙏🏼 Much appreciated! 🤘🏻
Anyone point me to IRs that work with NAM?
I think anything 48k wav format should work? I didn’t see any docs on that though.
It's a bit weird that the result was so different. NAM can achieve better results than any paid stuff to date.
I am glad to hear you had better results! I will keep trying, something in my setup here must be off.