Finally I found Latin mass in my city just few weeks ago n I can attend it w my daughter ty Lord💜 but looks like they still kind of secretive in doing it🙁
Imagine if the current Pope spoke like this priest, the World would be renewed. O come O Holy Spirit this feast of Pentecost and renew the face of the earth.
Thank for reiterating the SSPX position on exposing the contradictions and errors of Vatican II compared to what the Church has always taught. There are many new parishioners to SSPX Chapels that do not know much about these issues. Many treat the SSPX as another option for a reverent Mass but also attend other Masses (FSSP, etc or even Novus Ordo) because they are not taught this from the pulpit or Catechism after Mass. Especially in mission Chapels, many people do not understand that the Priest drives sometimes many hours to bring the Mass and Faith of all time so that they may be spared the errors and novelties of the modern Church, because they are not taught and preached to. Thank you.
TS. Even though I do not attend the Novus Ordo, I trust that it is valid. Only a few percent of all Catholics attend the Latin Mass. I pray that others can also be saved.
If Vatican ll does not teach what the church has always taught, then those who introduced these false teachings cannot possibly represent the authority of Our Lord,but represent a new religion.
The Aristotelian principle of Non-contradiction , which, when I learned it I immediately saw the contradictions in V2 . This is why I assist at Holy Mass with the SSPX because I know that I'm going to receive the Traditional Catholic ordinary universal magisterial teaching of the Church. 🙏➕
Very encouraging, now I know that Prayer for persons involved in the Magisterium is wehat is to be done on my part. That all things of Truth and of God are to prevail, in spite of man’s mechanizations. Lord, I Trust In You! And look to the tradition of the Church, it is to be protected by the faithful bishops and Priests that continue to uphold the Truth of God’s Revelation to them.
Thank you for the wonderful thoughts. As an Indian priest, who believes that there is no other way to salvation than Jesus Christ and the Church which he founded, I hold that religious freedom is a fundamental life. To deny one one's right to exercise the freedom to chose his beliefs is to deny the right of 'free will' which God has confirmed on one. Although there is only "one way" to Salvation, human beings need to be given the freedom and patience to journey and arrive to that truth which God will reveal to him. To deny this freedom is not the will of God.
When it comes to movies and programs, it was a sad day when the Legion of Decency ceased to exist. The Church had a strong voice when it came to decency. But then Vatican ll came in to marry the Church to the world. The SSPX may not be infallible, but the Society is right 99.99 % as compared to Modernism which is almost always 99.99% in error.
If only the protestants who hate on the church could discover the one true church as preserved in the SSPX. Except I guess they have adopted so many Heresies they remain in schism?? In any case praying for the conversion of all sinners. Praying for the triumph of the Immaculate heart of Mary.
The whole thing is an error. Thank God for SSPX. I go to a diocesan parish where we have a brave priest who does the Tridentine (real) Mass. He also does the NO but with kneeling, no eucharistic ministers, no altar girls. But you can tell he dislikes doing it. Hopefully, the Church will return to her former glory.
Lest anyone doubt that Vatican II and the promulgation of the Novus Ordo altered Church teaching, they should read the Ottoviani Intervention, which breaks your heart.
I ask this with utmost sincerity: does the believing in what the Church has always taught mean that priests must absolutely have their faculties granted by a jurisdictional authority, i.e. the bishop?
Fr Gregory Baum work the draft of the Vactian ll document he wrote e book in 1969 about that experience which when I attended kings college in 1975 77 we had as required reading in one if my ☯️ clases. He was surprised by the oppission early on .. Especially in his view it was the same doctrines just explained in more modern language . The title of the book is Faith and Doctrine.
The same thing that he has done with the sacred council can be also done with Holy Scripture. By a superficial reading of two seeming conflicted textos. For example: "But knowing that man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ; we also believe in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: because by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified." Galatians 2:16 And the verse that seems to conflict with that One: "Do you see that by works a man is justified; and not by faith only?." James 2:24 Then are we going to concluye that there Is no harmony between these two apostolic writings? Or rather to see that there Is perfect harmony and that the conflict is with us and not with Scripture... Or the Council? Don't listen to schismatic priest, they are going to lead you astray. Rather listen well to Scripture, tradition (not the lefebvrist spin on this) and the magisterium, and trust the Holy Spirit that, indeed, he has lead the Church wherever he wills. And that Is the case with Vatican Council II. Be obedient to his Vicar, Holy Father Francis. God bless.
I honestly feel that this sermon is comparing God with the humanly run church. God is never ever wrong, whilst the church, traditonal or otherwise can be wronged.
Superficial analysis. You proclaimed after the schism of 1054 that the Roman Church will never err. Now it's erring. Are you going to admit it was a false doctrine and return to orthodoxy? Kyrie eleison ☦️
"Piety is the virtue by which one gives honor to those who are above oneself as well as care of those who are entrusted to a person. Refusal to follow the tradition or rejection of the tradition, as we saw in how the monuments of the Church were stripped with impunity in the last two generations, is rooted in impiety. It is against piety to constantly change everything, because it is a rejection of the work of our forefathers. They labored to build the monuments, to gain greater doctrinal clarity, to perfect the discipline of the Church as well as a whole host of other things. They passed on the tradition intact which was given to them and then they added to the tradition things which would make it easier for us to understand the tradition, accept it and practice it. By the rejection and extensive overhauling of what was passed to them, the last two generations have in effect rejected their forefathers and what they bequeathed to them. It shows an unwillingness to submit one’s will to what is passed on to him." Chad A. Ripperger, The Binding Force of Tradition
God bless the SSPX!!!
I have recently begun attending SSPX Chapel. Glory to God for these priests!
Christ is King!
We are desperately in need of a Traditional Catholic Pope.
Nothing is absolutely right than what you've stated! 😔
Or just a Catholic pope would be good…
Rome is far away. Be Holy in your own place. So grateful for SSPX Priests.
Thank you,l was born in 1964 and a lover of Christ forever.l needed to hear this!
Thanks!
Very well said. God bless you Father and the SSPX.
Finally I found Latin mass in my city just few weeks ago n I can attend it w my daughter ty Lord💜 but looks like they still kind of secretive in doing it🙁
Imagine if the current Pope spoke like this priest, the World would be renewed. O come O Holy Spirit this feast of Pentecost and renew the face of the earth.
Thank for reiterating the SSPX position on exposing the contradictions and errors of Vatican II compared to what the Church has always taught.
There are many new parishioners to SSPX Chapels that do not know much about these issues. Many treat the SSPX as another option for a reverent Mass but also attend other Masses (FSSP, etc or even Novus Ordo) because they are not taught this from the pulpit or Catechism after Mass. Especially in mission Chapels, many people do not understand that the Priest drives sometimes many hours to bring the Mass and Faith of all time so that they may be spared the errors and novelties of the modern Church, because they are not taught and preached to.
Thank you.
TS. Even though I do not attend the Novus Ordo, I trust that it is valid. Only a few percent of all Catholics attend the Latin Mass. I pray that others can also be saved.
Thank you, Father. Praying for all in the Vatican.
I wish the priest had given the references for his quotes. At least in the notes. It would be very helpful.
Thank you. Beautiful. Truth is beautiful.
If Vatican ll does not teach what the church has always taught, then those who introduced these false teachings cannot possibly represent the authority of Our Lord,but represent a new religion.
Amen❤Three Hail Marys for the priest.🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼God bless you, Mary keep you.✝️
Excellent sermon! Thank you!
Excellent! Thank you.
If there are two conflicting ideas...
Either they are both wrong,
or one is right and one is wrong,
but they both can't be right.
The Aristotelian principle of Non-contradiction , which, when I learned it I immediately saw the contradictions in V2 . This is why I assist at Holy Mass with the SSPX because I know that I'm going to receive the Traditional Catholic ordinary universal magisterial teaching of the Church. 🙏➕
Some hard truths and sacred wisdom here.
Very good sermon. Thank you.
Very encouraging, now I know that Prayer for persons involved in the Magisterium is wehat is to be done on my part. That all things of Truth and of God are to prevail, in spite of man’s mechanizations.
Lord, I Trust In You!
And look to the tradition of the Church, it is to be protected by the faithful bishops and Priests that continue to uphold the Truth of God’s Revelation to them.
These side-by-side comparisons of statements both before the Council and after are devastating.
Thank you for the wonderful thoughts. As an Indian priest, who believes that there is no other way to salvation than Jesus Christ and the Church which he founded, I hold that religious freedom is a fundamental life. To deny one one's right to exercise the freedom to chose his beliefs is to deny the right of 'free will' which God has confirmed on one. Although there is only "one way" to Salvation, human beings need to be given the freedom and patience to journey and arrive to that truth which God will reveal to him. To deny this freedom is not the will of God.
Excellent!
Thank you Father. The errors of Vatican II have destroyed the world.
WE ACCUSING THE COUNCIL WITH THIS ONE 🗣️💯🔥
When it comes to movies and programs, it was a sad day when the Legion of Decency ceased to exist. The Church had a strong voice when it came to decency. But then Vatican ll came in to marry the Church to the world. The SSPX may not be infallible, but the Society is right 99.99 % as compared to Modernism which is almost always 99.99% in error.
The sermon is long overdue.
If only the protestants who hate on the church could discover the one true church as preserved in the SSPX. Except I guess they have adopted so many Heresies they remain in schism?? In any case praying for the conversion of all sinners. Praying for the triumph of the Immaculate heart of Mary.
No Comments Are Needed. 🔥✝️🙏
Thank you for your research and sharing it with us. Could you also share what councils you are quoting from please?
The whole thing is an error. Thank God for SSPX. I go to a diocesan parish where we have a brave priest who does the Tridentine (real) Mass. He also does the NO but with kneeling, no eucharistic ministers, no altar girls. But you can tell he dislikes doing it. Hopefully, the Church will return to her former glory.
AWAY WITH TRADITION -- Battle cry of AntiChrist
Nice
Lest anyone doubt that Vatican II and the promulgation of the Novus Ordo altered Church teaching, they should read the Ottoviani Intervention, which breaks your heart.
Sounds kinda like Fr Haynos
I never supported Vatican ll.
Sounds like Freemasonry and Syncretism! I am pretty shocked, as a new-found Catholic.
You have a lot to learn, apparently.
I ask this with utmost sincerity: does the believing in what the Church has always taught mean that priests must absolutely have their faculties granted by a jurisdictional authority, i.e. the bishop?
The orthodox Church is relevant.
We see the contradictions.
The main one is 'the Roman Church will never err'...
☦️
Probably a Jeweler behind the treachery as always.
So this is what you call full communion?
Partial communion is a Novus Ordo construct and contrivance. Like so much of it happens to be.
Fr Gregory Baum work the draft of the Vactian ll document he wrote e book in 1969 about that experience which when I attended kings college in 1975 77 we had as required reading in one if my ☯️ clases. He was surprised by the oppission early on .. Especially in his view it was the same doctrines just explained in more modern language . The title of the book is Faith and Doctrine.
The same thing that he has done with the sacred council can be also done with Holy Scripture. By a superficial reading of two seeming conflicted textos. For example: "But knowing that man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ; we also believe in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: because by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified."
Galatians 2:16
And the verse that seems to conflict with that One: "Do you see that by works a man is justified; and not by faith only?."
James 2:24
Then are we going to concluye that there Is no harmony between these two apostolic writings? Or rather to see that there Is perfect harmony and that the conflict is with us and not with Scripture... Or the Council?
Don't listen to schismatic priest, they are going to lead you astray. Rather listen well to Scripture, tradition (not the lefebvrist spin on this) and the magisterium, and trust the Holy Spirit that, indeed, he has lead the Church wherever he wills. And that Is the case with Vatican Council II. Be obedient to his Vicar, Holy Father Francis. God bless.
I honestly feel that this sermon is comparing God with the humanly run church. God is never ever wrong, whilst the church, traditonal or otherwise can be wronged.
Superficial analysis. You proclaimed after the schism of 1054 that the Roman Church will never err.
Now it's erring.
Are you going to admit it was a false doctrine and return to orthodoxy?
Kyrie eleison ☦️
No. The tradition cannot be wrong because it was given to the Church by Jesus Christ Himself.
"Piety is the virtue by which one gives honor to those who are above oneself as well as care of those who are entrusted to a person. Refusal to follow the tradition or rejection of the tradition, as we saw in how the monuments of the Church were stripped with impunity in the last two generations, is rooted in impiety. It is against piety to constantly change everything, because it is a rejection of the work of our forefathers. They labored to build the monuments, to gain greater doctrinal clarity, to perfect the discipline of the Church as well as a whole host of other things. They passed on the tradition intact which was given to them and then they added to the tradition things which would make it easier for us to understand the tradition, accept it and practice it. By the rejection and extensive overhauling of what was passed to them, the last two generations have in effect rejected their forefathers and what they bequeathed to them. It shows an unwillingness to submit one’s will to what is passed on to him."
Chad A. Ripperger, The Binding Force of Tradition
Luther strikes again (In the person of Lefebvre).
Ignorance and stupidity are not valid religions.
Thanks!