Matthew Arnold - The Function of Criticism at The Present Time.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2024
- Matthew Arnold as a Victorian Poet and Critic made a significant contribution to the body of Poetry and Criticism. The above said essay was written in 1865 and was the first to identify the role of Critic in elevating literature. It also affirms that Criticism is a vital component which adds to creative for dissemination of ideas in an impartial way. The essay is illuminating both as a new thought and new perspective. This Video details:
1. Arnold’s - The Function of Criticism at The Present Time
2. Structure of an Essay
3. Arnold: View on Criticism
4. Qualities of a Literary Critic
5. Threefold function of the Critic
6. Difference between Creative Faculty and Critical Faculty
7. Ideas of Disinterestedness
Thank You
Happy Birthday Ma'am!
Superb !!
Along with the knowledge of the subject matter, your lectures are excellent source to learn how to speak effectively...!!! A million thanks to you dear madam for making video lecture series...!!!
Thanks Dear for this appreciation
Do ask me for a subject of your choice
Mam please Cover MA English Previous Syllabus
The best video concerning this subject.
Many thanks Madam 🥰💕
Hello maam.Can you tell me that what are his views on Byron and Goethe.?
You deserve more subscribers
अद्भुत है ऐसे टीचर ।।। कवर करिये मैंम पूरा सिलेबस
Sure
Thankyou so much ma'am. Ma'am if possible kindly make videos on T.S. Eliot Tradition and Individual Talent, Hamlet, The metaphysical Poets
Certainly I shall soon do the needful
Jotted down every dot and comma..
Love from jharkhand.. ❤
mam any MEG 5 TUitions ????
Also could you elaborate on why his idea of disinterestedness is fallacious? Does it have anything to do with his touchstone method being historically influenced?
Can I answer it?
@@SecondsMarathonEnglishLAsifaIs please...be my guest
@@lyadhkhorcyclechalai69 thank you ❤️
@@lyadhkhorcyclechalai69 at first Arnold mentioned Historical Estimate as false estimate,we should not follow that but when he says about "disinterestedness": Being an impartial and just reader. And then he mentions some canon writer's works ....The problem is the name of the works that he mentioned that is also based on historical estimate...So his ideas become contradict...Got it??
Thank you Madam.
Thankyou ma'am for making this video i request you to make on the intentional fallacy by w.k wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley
You said that arnold considers criticism to be an art form...but doesnt he explicitly put criticism beneath creativity?...he says that criticism is nescessary for creativity, particularly for producing an environment conducive for creativity...however you did elaborate on the topic in a later section under the differences between creative and critical faculty....so why this statement earlier?
Thanks
❤❤