CAA: Why is it worrying? | Faye D'souza | Sanjay Hegde
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มี.ค. 2024
- The government notified rules for the Citizen Amendment Act this week, causing much celebration amongst few and much discontent amongst others. What does the CAA change in the country? Senior Supreme Court Advocate Sanjay Hegde speaks to Faye D'souza.
For more news and updates, download the Beatroot News App:
www.beatrootnews.com/download
Follow Faye D’Souza on Social Media
Instagram: / fayedsouza
Twitter: / fayedsouza
Facebook: / fayedsouzaofficial
#caa #fayedsouza #citizenshipammendmentact #news #bjp #india #indianews
It must be very difficult for Mr. Hegde!
Thank you for the show
CAA would effect most in the N.E. states, for instance Tripura 70% in general occupied by Bangladesh Bengali, the land, Assembly, top to bottom occupied. So where would the native go ? The southern part of Assam,East Assam are mostly occupied by Bangladesh Bangali where the Britishers without the consent of the native. In short CAA should be drafted seperately for different regions, then CAA would be meaningful.
What the Gujarat Mafia decides is the law of the land irrespective of the Constitutional validity 😮
tin foil hat
Thank you , Mr Hedge for your last comment .
The 400 par thing is to ensure that the particular people can do anything, without any objection or protest....
This needs to understood by people😢😢..
They don't have to bring NRC and all that, that will complicate the situation for minorities in india , Just give FC citizenship for local Hindus and SC Citizenship for expats( other religion ethnicity also LGBTQ people) along with equal rights to VOTE thatsall.
They should bring this rule in all politically Divided countries.
It is quite all right to talk about foundational identity of India. But partition of India on basis of religion is a reality, as is the persecution of people of non-majority religion is also a reality. So lets be realistic and not invoke great ideas from past now. Lets be practical.
Article 14, equality before law is not absolute. “Positive discrimination “ for a certain class is legal, otherwise reservation to SC/ST would not be legal. CAA is one such positive discrimination to certain class i.e; minorities in Islamic countries, hence perfectly legal. Please do not fall pray to fear mongering .
😂So we will have positive discrimination for Rohingyas and Tamilians from Sri Lanka and all persecuted Non-Hindus from Nepal?😂
😂 By extension of the CAA logic soon we will have positive discrimination in favor of UpperCastes (like EWS😂) against all other LowerCastesOBCsSCsSTsDalits for citizenship too apart fromSikhsChrisitiansTribals/evenBased on regions like south Indians(North Easterners etc) in case if we have no positive discrimination for Tamilians/Non Hindus Nepalis/Rohingyas…😜😉
Why not, if it fulfils the criterion of “ intelligible differentia” as articulated in article 14 and the government of the day in their wisdom deem it fit and is carried by majority in both the Houses of Parliament. However,
It is not obligatory on the part of government to carry the burden of the entire world on their shoulders.
@@kvsahas I am glad that you openly agree and that you are so excited to have the so called “intelligible differentia” to reject citizenship forTheLowCastes/SC/STs/OBCs/Shudras/Sikhs/Christians etc too and somehow suggesting that the Central government led by the UpperCaste/BaniyaBrahmins Don’t necessarily have to take care of the rest…And of course once you do that you would ALWAYS have Putin/Chinese Communist Party type full majority all the time.
Special treatment for a certain class of people does not mean rejection of the rest.
Usually, these debates are logical and reasonable, but this was a completely C class debate. It looked liked the lawyer was only trying to manipulate facts to suit a certain narrative. Very unintelligible.
Why?
@@Uff1234because he is from ideology problem is anything which this govt do these lefy ideology will link it with muslims
You cannot condemn an Act merely because of fear in people's mind. The day discrimination is done to insiders people should approach the SC with their grievance. I would support that definitely. But CAA can discriminate outsiders and that is not unconstitutional.
I agree . We need to look at the law carefully . The Government would do well to define what documents that would define citizenship .
What do the developed world do,in such case ?
@@Sangita_hotty The notification of rules does exactly that.
@@jaihind11 They should look at themselves and try and improve their country.
The lawyer says, "the finest victory was 1971 because we didn't discriminate who came into our country as refugees, hindus or Muslims". He considers this mass exodus as a victory to suit a certain narrative. 1971 was a tragedy, a year of bloodshed and almost a world war starting from the subcontinent. This lawyer's statements are outrageous and unacceptable. Refugees staying back as regular citizens is a major threat to demography... Does this incapable lawyer understand the repercussions of all those decisions in 71? Did he even check how non Muslims are treated in our neighborhood? People with such intelligence should not be invited for a debate. Disappointed.
Why only 3 countries are selected.Why not Myanmar,Tibet,Nepal,Srilanka,China.In what way is Afghanistan is connected to India.Why only 6 religions were only included,why Muslims were left out.
Why islamic countries dont accept them?? They very well know the consequences 😜
Because why would they come to a country where Muslims are suppressed and scared.
Looks like you just started following CAA recently. If you were following the debate from the begining, you would have know everyone's argument.
Especially the Afghanistan Question, its very famous, the question was answered by Amit Shah in response to the same question asked by Adhiranjan Chaudhary in the Parliament.
Found the ret--d whose daily source of news is whatsapp
Poor audio
This is rich class mentality. They don't understand how poor and middle class people live their lives in a day.
For example: Ola and zomato drivers don't even come through Muslim areas at night for fear of being murdered, beaten or picked on for a fight! Imagine car drivers are not safe in bangalore, this is because of huge influx of rowdy elements from Bangladesh... We can't change bangalore now, but atleast assam which is far worse than Bangalore.
I challenge this crappy lawyer to lose his car and security. Walk in Shivaji nagar for 5 minutes.
I'm a centrist, but certain narratives created by left leaning parties are just preposterous. Can't everyone use brains and avoid stupid emotions of religion, caste and region to make decisions? Oh well.
Pakistan should also bring CAA for the Indian Muslims because BJP and RSS are constantly persecuting Muslims here. We Indians will fully support that bill.
Why is cunning modi doing all this stuff???
For the good of the country. Try your luck with islamic countries 😉😉
Invite Harish Salve on your channel if you have guts.
He is a nut like u
For what joy?
@@mohammedmurtaza3257 The joy of seeing him speak facts and truths
Highly disingenuous.. you should try to steal man the position you’re opposing before justifying the made up fears of people.
I think Hegde was not clear about CAA or he was completely biased towards opposition parties.
It's you who is ignorant or biased about the matter.
Does USA follow this system ?
CAA does not apply to citizens of Bharat.. it applies to prosecuted religious minorities of the broader civilisation state of Bharat, to the parts which are under islamist oppression.. Hegdes, Chandrachuds are heavily biased.. however the law is very clear.. article 14 applies only to citizens within current boundaries of India, not to asylum seekers!!
14 is actually available to any persons except enemy alien. Bangladesh is not an enemy nation though.
@@aakansha353 constitution applies to citizens of Bharat!
Constitution is the law of the land. It even has provisions for implementation of international treaties. A nation is a far wider concept than citizenship.
Constitution under part III provides for fundamental rights. Under part III, Article 14, 20, 21, 21A, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 are available to all persons whether citizens or foreigners. Remaining fundamental rights are available only to citizens. Article 14 is among those rights that are available to any person.
@@aakansha353 constitution is not applicable to people outside of Bharat! Secularism socialism are illegal additions to the preamble!
@@aakansha353 Bangladeshi attitude toward India with India out campaign by BNP part & Jamat-e-Islam party is not showing that they are very friendly nation of India.
Basically, in a nutshell, you are ALL bothered about people who have illegally migrated to India and is a vote bank of non BJP allied parties.
The so called secularists are worried!! Vote matters!! 😉😉 Their hatred for modi is the prime reason . CAA is here to stay. Cry as much as possible😂😂😂
Yes CAA will stay because it passed by the government. Just because a bill is passed doesn't mean it's good for the people. It will change the demography of Assam. Why don't Modi invite all non Indian Hindus to live in Gujarat?
Try saying that to the BJP supporters and party members in Assam kiddo. 😂
Oh my bad I missed, someone from Assam did give you a slap already 😂
Person is temporary and the Country is permanent.
@@lupabiswal6038 the most useless sentences ive read in a while
@@sainianand5930 Great. Did you feel good about yourself? 👏. 860 young Assamese lost their life fighting for this one cause and now everything went in vain. Great. Feel good about yourself.