Understanding Aircraft Electrical Systems - Part 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
  • Join us in Part 1 of our educational series on aircraft electrical systems, where we simplify complex concepts using water analogies. This innovative approach makes understanding the fundamentals of aircraft electrics accessible and engaging. Whether you're a budding pilot, aviation enthusiast, or just curious about how planes work, this video is a great starting point. Stay tuned for more in this series as we dive deeper into the world of aircraft electrical systems.

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @Waldo-01
    @Waldo-01 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I’m definitely going to be getting my Multi Entine add on at Captain Seth Lake’s school. This is high quality teaching.

  • @nutrientdensepermaculture9391
    @nutrientdensepermaculture9391 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I have so much respect for Seth Lake, even if I were guaranteed a checkride failure I’d still pay for the pleasure 😂

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂 that's some high praise, thank you.

  • @NathanBallardSaferFlying
    @NathanBallardSaferFlying 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is terrific - and your content is must-watch for anyone that wants to be a safer, smarter pilot 💪

  • @sebasto6791
    @sebasto6791 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is gold

  • @Carltheproducer
    @Carltheproducer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great presentation!

  • @Rance120
    @Rance120 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for taking the time to put the video together…..enjoyed it!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @shanelymullikin9062
    @shanelymullikin9062 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great to see you back, Seth. Great video.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More to come!

  • @NorthwestAeronaut
    @NorthwestAeronaut 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great video, Seth! Keep them coming!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @anthonyb4913
    @anthonyb4913 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was amazing!!! Love the visual aids and the clarity of information.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @BillOsborn-us1eq
    @BillOsborn-us1eq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Loved the example. Never heard it explained that way before. Even thought I know it this still held my attention.
    Great job

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad to hear it!

  • @kyleball2217
    @kyleball2217 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve watched a ton of your videos! Especially from the beginning. Great stuff Seth!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome! Thank you!

  • @fredirecko
    @fredirecko 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Did you make part 2? thanks

  • @alexjacobellis8664
    @alexjacobellis8664 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome video, need more of these

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! More to come.

  • @shockerthreeone
    @shockerthreeone 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content, clear explanations. Thanks, Seth!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My pleasure!

  • @winnie6672
    @winnie6672 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THANK YOU!

  • @Tatumthornton
    @Tatumthornton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you!!!

  • @wadelovell9236
    @wadelovell9236 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video Seth thank you!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My pleasure!

  • @EvanKelly391
    @EvanKelly391 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Seth, great video.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it!

  • @paperplate674
    @paperplate674 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent analogy and great visual demo

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @kylecrumpton1048
    @kylecrumpton1048 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are awesome. I know these videos to a lot of time. Please keep them coming 🎉

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! Will do!

  • @gregorywhite4573
    @gregorywhite4573 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brother, you’ve got this thing on lock. I’m watching these in receive mode now😎

  • @JoshPiland
    @JoshPiland 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was stoked to see there’s another series. Thank you Seth! #Props As for an⚡️ electrical system lesson request: You’d mentioned “shedding” draw from the battery. I’m assuming there’s a universal sequence and emergency checklist. What’s your personal approach to this?

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Later in the series we will discuss load shedding and best techniques. Thanks for watching!

  • @Aliveinthesky
    @Aliveinthesky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video thank you

  • @Alex-vm2ne
    @Alex-vm2ne 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perfect content!

  • @estefaniavillaririberri3412
    @estefaniavillaririberri3412 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much 👏🏽

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome!

  • @MichaelLGriffin
    @MichaelLGriffin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely loved your water analogy for electricity! Going to use it with my Cub Scouts if you don't mind!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely!

  • @mathieusan
    @mathieusan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the analogy with water. Thanks for doing this video. One question I was asked during my PPL checkride was about circuit breaker failure, and how many times should one try to reset it and why. Essentially how a fire can start from a circuit breaker perspective (for example, if the pilot reset it too many times, or hold it shut too long making the circuit breaker weld shut or sparks.. which would have high likelihood of starting a fire). Perhaps reviewing different circuit breaker design itself (I am sure they've improved over the years) and why a pilot should not try to reset a breaker in flight that is not critical to the flight, like the beacon light.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great question! I will be doing a video on circuit breakers very soon!

  • @kasm10
    @kasm10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Seth!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome!

  • @user-kx9im1oo1i
    @user-kx9im1oo1i 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Perfect explanation for those who is twice lawyer decided to become a CPL 😂😊

  • @frankiefrank4853
    @frankiefrank4853 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great work. I run a Low Voltage company and I might use this in a class room for a career day. Depending on the location that they give us.

  • @bobcfi1306
    @bobcfi1306 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done demo

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you.

  • @piloto2412
    @piloto2412 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the most basic explanation and its made perfect for everyone to understand it. Thanks man. Id like to learn how to better read the schematics in easy and some complex examples such as a cessna and a 737 or maybe a c130😊. Thanks

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Schematics will be coming up soon. They are difficult to read but fortunately, most pilots don’t need to be electrical engineers to be effective. The modern line diagrams and system diagrams are much easier to read. I’ll see what I can do about showing some more advanced systems. Good idea.

  • @draggerdriver
    @draggerdriver 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice Taylorcraft!

  • @Xen_Prime
    @Xen_Prime 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Seth. Have you done a video about protective earthing? How is it designed, isolated and utilized?

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, I haven't. Maybe in the future series I'll get to it.

  • @GlensHangar
    @GlensHangar 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting - but I have questions about what you say at 13:44 ish. 30 minutes of power from an aircraft battery seems pretty short? When I refurbed my 172 with a glass panel, new lights all round, swapped the generator for a 50 amp alternator, etc, etc.
    I tested the battery life with all equipment on, all panels, radios, lights, etc; the ships battery lasted 2.5 hours. That's when the internal back-up batteries cut in and went another 90 minutes to keep the panels and radios working; though I lost the lights at the 2.5 hour mark.
    I guess older six pack equipment sucks more juice, I know that the older incandescent lights certainly do.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, older instruments do tend to draw more battery power. Testing the battery life on the ground isn't a perfect test however. One of the biggest power draws on your battery is the power used to make radio transmissions. Additionally, batteries lose their capacity over time, especially the types used in aviation.

  • @TheAndrewScandal
    @TheAndrewScandal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! It would be great to understand how the ammeter works. I was told some are configured to show the charge to a battery, while other times apparently it's showing the draw from it? Maybe I'm getting that wrong, but in either case, the ammeter is a source of confusion for me during the instrument check!

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great point! I'll make sure I hook up a ammeter and explain how it works in a future episode in this series.

  • @livyiv
    @livyiv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Seth, thank you for the video. I like your metaphors using water but I am confused when I look at the C172N POH at my flight school. The electrical diagram pictured appears to show the battery supplying the starter, but the alternator directly feeding both primary and avionics bus, not feeding the battery which then feeds the busses. At school I had been taught what you said in the video, that the alternator power passes through the battery en route to the busses, but the POH diagram does not look that way to me. Would you be able to clarify this point?

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Send me a picture of the diagram to sethlake@vsl.aero. I'll help you identify where the alternator ties into the battery.

  • @terryboyer1342
    @terryboyer1342 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very informative and in an easy to understand way. Now can you explain life, the universe and everything in a similar manner? Thanks!

    • @johnopalko5223
      @johnopalko5223 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      42. 😃

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha, thanks!

  • @slamandgo
    @slamandgo 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Part 2?

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hopefully I can record it soon!

  • @alk672
    @alk672 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is an interesting analogy, certainly helps non-technical people visualize things better. If you do understand how electricity works though, it's actually quite striking how flawed this analogy is (took me a while to realize). The main problem is that it appears here that water is analogous to electrical charges, but it's not. Electrical battery is perfectly capable of moving charges around the circuit for an extended period of time, so what represents the battery (the EMF it generates) is both gravitational force on the way down and the electric pump on the way up. So it doesn't make sense to call the bucket a battery, and the pump a generator. The correct relationship between the two models would be: battery is gravitational force plus the pump (or even just the pump if you don't rely on gravity and just make everything hydraulic), and generator is the electrical source into which the pump is plugged. But then of course there's no feedback in the system, and the analogy is ruined... kinda funny how similar it looks, but how different it actually is.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great point. Thank you for the feedback.

    • @dubbacremona
      @dubbacremona 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The water analogy is pretty common for electricity. I think I see what you're objecting to in terms of the analogy, but I believe you're trying to substitute the water flow directly for the flow of electrons and the analogy isn't meant to be this literal. You're right, that even though a battery is not being recharged, the electrons are still flowing all the way back to the battery in a closed loop - they aren't being destroyed or removed from the system. Instead of thinking water = electrons, keep it more abstract and think water pressure conceptually is like voltage (potential) and the flow of water is like the flow of electrons (amperage). To your point, the water pressure is literally because of gravity and is directly proportional to the weight of the water column. When you run a battery without recharging it, the voltage decreases (the level and in turn pressure of water in the bucket). So when the battery is running without being recharged by the generator/alternator, this is no pump and the level is constantly dropping. The pump in the analogy isn't the closed loop of the circuit, it is to restore the battery voltage (or potential) to the maximum. So you could think of the water level like the battery icon on your phone (0-100% full) and the pump is the charging cable. Again, this is all meant to be a metaphor to help intuitive understanding, but it doesn't represent or describe the actual underlying physics. The true underlying physics of the battery level is really the electrochemistry to create the voltage potential (not simply returning the electrons in a closed loop), but that's farther down the rabbit hole than needed to have a practical and useful mental model of the electrical system in an aircraft.

    • @dubbacremona
      @dubbacremona 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PS Seth, I think you did a great job in terms of presenting the analogy and helping present a good "model" for how to conceptualize the topic. Also, I just had a really great IFR checkride and can't thank you enough for the IFR content you put out.

    • @alk672
      @alk672 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dubbacremona yeah as a metaphor it works very well. If you somehow drive the pump off of the water stream it would be ever better.

    • @SethLakeDPE
      @SethLakeDPE  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dubbacremona Appreciate your input. The water analogy is a simplified way to get the core concepts across for pilots, not a precise scientific explanation. I agree it has its limits. The idea is to create an accessible mental model for understanding electrical systems in aviation. A deep dive into battery electrochemistry and its implications on system performance could be a good topic for a future video. Thanks for engaging and the suggestion - it’s valuable for making this content as practical as possible for pilots.