Steven Strogatz’s Secrets of Math Communication

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @QuantaScienceChannel
    @QuantaScienceChannel  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Subscribe to "The Joy of Why," a new podcast from Quanta Magazine and Steven Strogatz: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why-youtube

    • @ridasadam1919
      @ridasadam1919 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Our

    • @farhanaf832
      @farhanaf832 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can u make video about Boinc distributed computing software?

  • @leontedumitru
    @leontedumitru 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    This channel is just on another level. Great content

  • @othmanelkaddioui4364
    @othmanelkaddioui4364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I admire how honest this man is and i would like to thank quanta magazine for this content

  • @davyroger3773
    @davyroger3773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This guy is spot on about loving a topic! Unfortunately too many teachers actually make students not only feel dumb but hate a subject. Once curiosity is engaged and the student starts to derive pleasure from the problems it self, the job of the teacher is completed

  • @maxtsivourakis137
    @maxtsivourakis137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Steven is an amazing human being.

    • @energyeve2152
      @energyeve2152 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I had applied to the program in Cornell and I somehow got in contact with him and had a phone call with him. He’s very generous and great to speak to. I feel blessed and lucky to have gotten a moment to speak to such a great teacher.

  • @bendavis2234
    @bendavis2234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wish I had a teacher like Steven for my calculus class. It’s so important that the teacher actually loves their subject!

  • @abhijitpradhan9831
    @abhijitpradhan9831 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Beautiful talk by Steven strogatz .

  • @avinkon
    @avinkon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Humble and a great story teller

  • @prelude2752
    @prelude2752 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Steven for your honest and inspiring words.Thanks to the interviewer for his well chosen questions.

  • @belalsherif553
    @belalsherif553 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Infinite powers: best intro to calculus ever.
    Strogatz is a great man

  • @energyeve2152
    @energyeve2152 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The dictation function for writing sounds like such a great idea for people that struggle to write like myself. Thank you for sharing that!

  • @anirbanc88
    @anirbanc88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i have tried to learn math in so many ways, and this session gave me a porfound change, thank you! loved this!

  • @loranelizabeth9148
    @loranelizabeth9148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a terrific, engaging, FUN, interview! Thank you so much, Steven!

  • @lucytkmts
    @lucytkmts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are not many people who can talk genuinely honestly out of his or her own heart and Steven is the one

  • @dylanparker130
    @dylanparker130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Really enjoyed this & love the channel!

  • @lucytkmts
    @lucytkmts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    More and more I realize that EACH people is different in everything, in any aspect of human actions and thinking. So what is most challenging is how to describe or simply talk what each wants to have understood. In this internet world knowlege is not a big challenge but HOW to describe is, which is as he says to intrigue his or her love on what we want to share. It should start with one simple sentence: What is it that you feel you would dream to have right now?

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank Steven's Wife and Daughter for Sync, it's good to read along with Professor Susskind's lectures that tend toward Holographic Principle Perspective Imagery. GD&P Actuality here-now-forever helps.

  • @sweetbluealien
    @sweetbluealien 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant interview! ♾️❤️

  • @bpolat
    @bpolat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great content. Thank you.

  • @myhumblebeginnings
    @myhumblebeginnings 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Steven Strogatz is a humble guy.

  • @KaiseruSoze
    @KaiseruSoze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I do hope to see "the joy of why" on youtube.

    • @QuantaScienceChannel
      @QuantaScienceChannel  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      We don't plan to release episodes of the podcast on TH-cam, but you can find them here: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why-youtube

    • @MarcosBitachi
      @MarcosBitachi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@QuantaScienceChannel Thank you very much

    • @voroldrwarfff8858
      @voroldrwarfff8858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its on spotify too !

  • @uasserkamal2002
    @uasserkamal2002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this magazine gives me a different look to science

  • @voroldrwarfff8858
    @voroldrwarfff8858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a man

  • @mustbegross
    @mustbegross 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can relate to him on how you would gradually fall in love with something difficult in the first place.

  • @jurgenstephanopolus5095
    @jurgenstephanopolus5095 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "help the student fall in love with the question"
    That's it.

  • @bygabop9368
    @bygabop9368 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most striking feature of exp(at) is that it is the eigenfunction of the linear operator, I believe.

    • @j.p.mccarthy9713
      @j.p.mccarthy9713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of "a" linear operator. Which one?

    • @bygabop9368
      @bygabop9368 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of any linear operator, I mean all of them.

    • @bygabop9368
      @bygabop9368 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Any order derivative or any order integral….

    • @j.p.mccarthy9713
      @j.p.mccarthy9713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are linear operators that are not differentiation.

    • @bygabop9368
      @bygabop9368 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@j.p.mccarthy9713 choose a generic one, for instance T{x} = a x
      If T is any linear operator than x is a comple exponential.

  • @austingonzalez1148
    @austingonzalez1148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    9:27. We're overproducing and failing at distribution? Sounds like he's a mathematics Karl Marx! haha. Proofs from each according to their ability, to each according to their proof need.

  • @dipmadk.b5774
    @dipmadk.b5774 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    777👍 bring more content on mathematics

  • @mahkhi7154
    @mahkhi7154 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your Math does Not have the CONSTRUCTS to describe Complicated Software Involving 100's of Variables.
    Your Math can do: Y=2X - A 2D Graph. Y=2X+3Z - a 3D Graph.
    If you develop that math for Complex Software you'll Get UML and Programming Languages such as ADA, C++ and Visual Basic. A programming Language is Formal. if it was Informal, the Computer wouldn't Know how to Run it.

  • @teslasam2713
    @teslasam2713 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello 🥰guyzs

  • @chief-men-no1186
    @chief-men-no1186 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    .124500+.542100=.6666
    Forwards+backward^values=values^backwards+forwards
    Forwards and backwards truth read makes truth read backwards and forward.
    (F+B)read^truth=truth^read(B+F)
    All rights reserved. No rights waived for creative material with comments.

  • @Rigel_nz
    @Rigel_nz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hallo

  • @ScottDBowen
    @ScottDBowen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Test

  • @gmaf79
    @gmaf79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Math is the only thing that can't be copyrighted or patented. This fact greatly reduces the number of people researching math to only mathematicians, who get paid handsomely to do math.
    Creativity will very rarely blossom from this structure making mathematics greatly handicapped.

    • @Flaystray
      @Flaystray 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Math can't be patented, making the only people who do it those who like it, therefore it's greatly handicapped. Got it 👍

    • @gmaf79
      @gmaf79 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Flaystray Wrong. Making only people who get paid do it.

    • @adityakhanna113
      @adityakhanna113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh math can very well be patented. Algorithms are patented all the time. Theorems can probably come under Intellectual property and if mathematicians wanted the y could patent their findings. But math people are too nice to do that

  • @chief-men-no1186
    @chief-men-no1186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grammatically-correct-sentence-expression
    5+5=10=5+5.
    complete-sentence-showing-fact-showing-sentence-complete.
    1+1=2=1+1=2
    Complete-sentence-showing+complete-sentence-showing+complete-sentence-showing=fact showing sentences complete
    Be to-show must-show-to-be
    1=1. 👈complete sentence
    Complete sentence shows cause=cause shows sentence complete.
    Complete sentence shows facts
    10=10. 👈 does that show to-be Complete sentence
    Verb shows-&-says what noun says-&-does.
    Verb-speaks-&-says what-noun-say-&-does=(=)make/equal/show/says/amount-to-value-to-amount/fact=correct-expression-grammar
    Subject(fact)-verb(does)-what ?
    Does(what)what(shows)does
    Does(when)
    Does(how)
    ---(line(string)from/for cause)storyline
    Conjunction=+=connection🪢(connects-&-makes-connection-for)
    5🪢5=10
    Subject-verb-connection(conjunction)-
    1--fact(value)noun(subject)
    +=conjunction-to-preposition=+
    1--value(fact)subject(noun)
    =(=)2 values of 1 value of 2 value
    Shows/declares/states/storyline
    All rights reserved. No rights waived for creative material from comments.