I'm not a Mythomagician nor a Folosopher, but thank-you for sharing! Sir! I have some questions and I'd be honored if you answered, as I find that you are far more well-versed in the his-story than most that I've come into contact with. I like Geometry. Pure Geometry. And I LOVE Physics, which has etymology meaning that it pertains to nature.... while the new definition of bifurcation is just Descartes' Mind-Body Dualism which was regrettably adopted by Science. (Even thought his Mechanistic Gravity wasn't which is a laugh!) And I finally decided to redefine Mathematics as not an all encompassing field like the mainstream does.... but as Abstract Geometry with respect to Time. Aka Dynamical Abstract Geometry. Which is basically what Calculus is. Newton wanted Absolute Time, so he concepted Absolute Acceleration and Absolute Space... but he failed which is why we have Poincare's Time Dilation. Apparently Physics can't "physic" without a Limit for the Speed of Light 'c' but then John Gabriel (Google his name with Limit Theory) says that Calculus doesn't require Limits.... Have you ever looked into how we applied Dynamical Abstract Geometry to the Natural World!? (You might have if you know of Noether and her contributions to Abstract Algebra) I'd love to hear your thoughts! Especially your complaints - if you have any - for outdated applications of ill-formed mythomatics! 🙏📿 Oh! Also! Have you looked into Vedic Mathematics!? (I can't believe how much we stole from India dude! As an White Australian I am shocked an appalled by my British Ancestors!) (Oh and now I have just remembered a few other questions I have) Do you agree that 0 belongs on the Number Line? (My teacher said "Counting begins at 1, but Measurement begins at 0. Take 0 off the number line!") Do you agree with the current definition of the Rule of Signs which is inconsistent as -a*-b=ab while a*b=ab? (Mythomagicians tell me that they need it "to make math work" but thats just like saying, Logic doesn't Logic unless we use Illogic!) Oh! And have you seen Terrance Howards complaints against the Multiplicative Identity Property!? (I sought closure on my own... and redefined Groups as Wholes and Sets as Piles.... But I'm confused on how to represent a Whole Pile and a Pile of Wholes! The habitually online tell me I'm wrong but never tell me why so I think they are bluffing sir!) But back to Terrance Howard! He says 1*1=2 which is wrong according to our current axiomatic system.... but Math is suppose to represent Nature no? So.... if I have 1 bubble and another 1 bubble, and collide them... if they merge then 1+1 now =1 and if they don't merge but form a double bubble then one can say 1+1=2 This is the same for 1*1=1 and 1*1=2 as if I have 1 gold coin in my left hand and 1 gold coin in my right. And instead of ADDITION I instead use MULTIPLICATION - which is currently defined as repeated addition of whole numbers - then why does one of the gold coins disappear? These questions have plagued me for a long time and I patiently seek your answer! 🙂
T Howard is referencing the flower of life. It’s a fascinating geometric structure. Sir Penrose’s contributed a lot and you might start there and not bubbles
@brendawilliams8062 it is! I love the vesica Pisces and spirals as well. But in reality bubbles create planes in-between each other so it's an idealistic form for spiritual purposes rather than actually representing a physical form. It's still great for inspiration though! 😍
@@jaydenwilson9522 I study curves and number theory. I admire both astrology and astronomy. But you know twisters have numerical values. So it produces a rich field of study
@@brendawilliams8062 I like physical spirals like vortexes and twisters! But i don't even know what a twister in mythomagics is! And you better!! We got mathematics from the Indians who derived it from studying the stars! 😍🙄
@@jaydenwilson9522 I think I am correct in saying that many ancient advanced civilizations studied the stars. Curved space and straight lines like triangles are will make up two birds of the same feather with a gap that makes for a deeper study
1:26:00 Is this why Physicists struggle so much with Boundary Layers!? I think this is why some of them have gone on to create Spintronics!? th-cam.com/video/HB1EUoiWYBg/w-d-xo.html
I'm not a Mythomagician nor a Folosopher, but thank-you for sharing!
Sir! I have some questions and I'd be honored if you answered, as I find that you are far more well-versed in the his-story than most that I've come into contact with.
I like Geometry. Pure Geometry. And I LOVE Physics, which has etymology meaning that it pertains to nature.... while the new definition of bifurcation is just Descartes' Mind-Body Dualism which was regrettably adopted by Science. (Even thought his Mechanistic Gravity wasn't which is a laugh!)
And I finally decided to redefine Mathematics as not an all encompassing field like the mainstream does.... but as Abstract Geometry with respect to Time. Aka Dynamical Abstract Geometry.
Which is basically what Calculus is.
Newton wanted Absolute Time, so he concepted Absolute Acceleration and Absolute Space... but he failed which is why we have Poincare's Time Dilation.
Apparently Physics can't "physic" without a Limit for the Speed of Light 'c' but then John Gabriel (Google his name with Limit Theory) says that Calculus doesn't require Limits....
Have you ever looked into how we applied Dynamical Abstract Geometry to the Natural World!? (You might have if you know of Noether and her contributions to Abstract Algebra)
I'd love to hear your thoughts! Especially your complaints - if you have any - for outdated applications of ill-formed mythomatics!
🙏📿
Oh! Also! Have you looked into Vedic Mathematics!? (I can't believe how much we stole from India dude! As an White Australian I am shocked an appalled by my British Ancestors!)
(Oh and now I have just remembered a few other questions I have)
Do you agree that 0 belongs on the Number Line?
(My teacher said "Counting begins at 1, but Measurement begins at 0. Take 0 off the number line!")
Do you agree with the current definition of the Rule of Signs which is inconsistent as -a*-b=ab while a*b=ab?
(Mythomagicians tell me that they need it "to make math work" but thats just like saying, Logic doesn't Logic unless we use Illogic!)
Oh! And have you seen Terrance Howards complaints against the Multiplicative Identity Property!?
(I sought closure on my own... and redefined Groups as Wholes and Sets as Piles.... But I'm confused on how to represent a Whole Pile and a Pile of Wholes! The habitually online tell me I'm wrong but never tell me why so I think they are bluffing sir!)
But back to Terrance Howard!
He says 1*1=2 which is wrong according to our current axiomatic system.... but Math is suppose to represent Nature no?
So.... if I have 1 bubble and another 1 bubble, and collide them... if they merge then 1+1 now =1 and if they don't merge but form a double bubble then one can say 1+1=2
This is the same for 1*1=1 and 1*1=2 as if I have 1 gold coin in my left hand and 1 gold coin in my right. And instead of ADDITION I instead use MULTIPLICATION - which is currently defined as repeated addition of whole numbers - then why does one of the gold coins disappear?
These questions have plagued me for a long time and I patiently seek your answer! 🙂
T Howard is referencing the flower of life. It’s a fascinating geometric structure. Sir Penrose’s contributed a lot and you might start there and not bubbles
@brendawilliams8062 it is!
I love the vesica Pisces and spirals as well.
But in reality bubbles create planes in-between each other so it's an idealistic form for spiritual purposes rather than actually representing a physical form.
It's still great for inspiration though! 😍
@@jaydenwilson9522 I study curves and number theory. I admire both astrology and astronomy. But you know twisters have numerical values. So it produces a rich field of study
@@brendawilliams8062 I like physical spirals like vortexes and twisters!
But i don't even know what a twister in mythomagics is!
And you better!! We got mathematics from the Indians who derived it from studying the stars! 😍🙄
@@jaydenwilson9522 I think I am correct in saying that many ancient advanced civilizations studied the stars. Curved space and straight lines like triangles are will make up two birds of the same feather with a gap that makes for a deeper study
1:26:00
Is this why Physicists struggle so much with Boundary Layers!?
I think this is why some of them have gone on to create Spintronics!? th-cam.com/video/HB1EUoiWYBg/w-d-xo.html