I had my mtDNA tested in hopes of finding information about my matrilineal "alien" 2nd great-grandmother (thank you for trying to help me with her, by the way). I shouldn't have been surprised when the mtDNA haplogroup turned out to be a rare one. 23andMe says my haplogroup is U6 and rare on their site. There is only one other person on my match list has it (aside from my daughter). FTDNA is where I had the full sequence mtDNA done and they said it is U6b2. One of the other websites (maybe mitoydna, but I can't remember) says that I am now in the new haplogroup U6b2a, which I suppose is even more rare than U6b2. No matter where I turn, there are obstacles in regards to finding the parents of that great-great grandmother. At least it's not boring! Have a blessed weekend.
Thank you for this video. I'm only now beginning to jump in and figure out all of this DNA stuff. It's so confusing. Basic question for "Dummies" = What causes the 'mutations' you referred to as each group migrated? Thanks!
It's recombination of our genes when a zygote is created at the cellular level. Check out my explanation using Legos to demonstrate the changes th-cam.com/video/1Cikj7FI6YM/w-d-xo.html
Any idea what would cause no subclaves showing on a dna test? I tested Haplogroup R but no subclaves as they stated there are no mutations that would cause subclaves so I'm only R. I'm so confused lol.
@@FamilyHistoryFanatics Thank you. How long does it take for a mutation to happen? Also, is the J that's found in Dagestan in the Caucasus the same as the J that's found on the Arabian Peninsula? Are the two related? Sorry for asking so many questions. Just trying to understand how this works.
Hi there U have this haplogroup because of the first ancestor having the mutation subclades T2a1b and this origin is widely spread to different countries this haplogroup is mostly common in western Europe/iberia but it could represent other countries too as the first person of that mutation was living in iberia between africa
Great series-- thank you for the map. I much prefer to do my genealogical research from sources that are least likely to be biased-- not that that's prevalent in this line of research. Are haplotypes determined by the sheer number of mutations, or is it a function of the severity of the phenotype shift and impact on survival?
I noticed that C started so close to ADAM and after three mutations stayed the same all the way to North America. Quite different from Q though which was more complex.
Thank you for the presentation. It’s useful. I only have a question: can we witness a mutation from one haplogroup to another? For instance, someone’s haplogroup is A-m32, can he or his great offspring one day shift to B or any other downstream haplogroups? Does being on a haplogroup mean you’re permanently on that haplogroup? I’m not here asking about branching under the same haplogroup
No. You inherit your Y-DNA haplogroup from your father. Another haplogroup would be someone else's father, and you can't inherit it from anyone other than your father, even if they are an ancestor. Maternal haplogroups are the same through your mother. On the other hand, haplogroups do change over time, and, for example R1b-P297 changed in the Bronze Age or earlier to R1b-L51. But it didn't or couldn't change to an R1a haplogroup, or something like that. That would be the equivalent to a dog having a baby that was a horse.
My mtDna is J2b1a2 however my mom and aunt are J2b1a I've looked around online and I dont understand why I have a 2 on the end of mine but my mom doesn't. Also mtDna J2 and Ydna J2 are not the same correct? Why have the same name?
It is because they tested your haplogroup in more detail. Your mother also has a 2 in the end but the testing company didn't go into that much detail. I assume you used two different services? And yes mt dna is different from Y dna mt dna is maternal lineage while y dna is paternal lineage you share with your father
Question my haplogroup is L1c3b google says it’s highest concentration is among pygmies so would that mean I could be directly related to some pygmies in Africa ?
If u aren't currently from pigmy(hunter gatherers)most of whom aren't on digital media That haplogroup was formed before modern pigmy and ur tribe or race
@ivryparadise1488 How tall are You, Your father and mother, brothers and sisters and your children ? I know a television star namer Petitjean ( shortjohn), a typical medieval sobriquet. And he is effectively 1 .47 m tall !
Hello! I really enjoyed your video.. Could I ask a question though? I have recieved my father's haplogroup which is I-L38. Does this mean that the earliest family origins of my family go back to the time of this mutation? So say ' I' goes back to the last glacial Maximum before this I was J, does this mean that my family tree could go back to after the mutation but no further? Thanking you
The haplogroup and mutations give you rough ideas of the paths of migrations for your genetic ancestors. Your family tree will only extend as far as you can build it using genetic relatives (through cousin matching) and genealogical records. However, I would caution against doing deep ancestral research until you've validated your 16 great-granparental lines.
Yes unless the company messed it up. Take a second test to be sure. Also keep in mind haplogroups are found almost all over the world. G is not exclusive to Sardinia, It has even been found in Egypt close to you, so it is not far fetched
Do u know if Y haplogroup e1b1a mutated to give birth to e1b1b?because the kushitic have e1b1b and bantu have e1b1a And e1b1b is found in east Africa somalia Did e1b1a originate in east Africa or mutation happened after they arrived in cameroun west africa
According to haplogroup.org/, the current origin is unknown. However, you can see some really great graphics about haplogroup 'family trees' on Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mitochondrial_DNA_haplogroup
Can the same mutation occur in different parts of the world in different periods of time? 😅 does it mean that this group of people are (or were) more prone to have mutations?))
I understand the hablogroups but not sure to how it’s important to your dna? I Guess Im confused because even though we migrate from certain areas we have different dna from a different ethnic background. Just confusing
No one has "pure blood" people moved ,mixed and slavery was normal so slave women got pregnant and also after rape in wars , genetic mutation so an ethnic group is never 100% the same genetically.
QUEŠTIONS: What does the mutation do ? What does it transmit ? susceptibility to say "diabetes" or " green eyes" , "stature" ? telligence/ intelligence ? " skills ? character ? THAT is what we are interested to ! I descend 23 times from Charlemagne, Ludwig der Fromme, down to Karl Martel, the Musulslayer. Should I worry about going to be a musulslayer ? And if this were the case, could a CRISPR intervention on my mutation knock it out ? THAT is WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW !!! Which genes are affected by those mutations : autosomal, mitochondrial, X or Y ? The CRISPR gene repair method could allow a homogeneisation of jumanity into patient, easy, social, happy dudes. OR NOT ?
i found a website describing the heritage of local lastnames in a region between montenegro and serbia. The website says that the people tested in montenegro (with my lastname) have the haplogroup G-Z2026, and the ones in turkey (also with the same lastname as mine) have the haplogoup R-Y13891. But looking up haplogroups in the internet i only find shorter ones. I dont know how i can use the information i found for further research. Can someone help me out?
The haplogroup G is andemic to the region, the first agricultors of Anatolia had it and G-Z2026 must be a subclade of G (Subclade meaning mutation). Regarding R it has origins in Eurasia. There is other mutations of R who also migrated massively in Europe wich are R1a and R1b. Most important thing, haplogroup on Y-Dna doesn't define your genom but only your lineage from your father
They are likely descended from two different men with the same name. For example many Englishmen have the surname Smith despite not being related. So naturally they would have different lineages
Can you share the name of these studies that led to the creation of haplogroups. I have some reservations about the directions of these studies. It seems the people who are conducting these studies aren't aware of some migrations that took place in the 1400s and the 1500s. Starting with Columbus he took as many Arawak Indians as he could to Europe and Africa to sell as slaves'. The Portuguese did the same in the 1500s to tribes in Canada. Many Brazilians were taken to Angola and other locations in west africa. Somehow this is never considered when they create these haplogroups. These American Indians have descendants alive today in africa. Some are in the political arena. You wouldn't be able to look at them and differentiate them from other Africans. However their grandparents or great grandparents were Brazilians or sometimes described as Portuguese since that's who they came with. Known as Luso Africans. The DNA data does not match the historical records of migration and this needs to be corrected. This is not to be scoffed at. DNA research took off in the 80s whereas these migrations of American Indians to Africa and Europe began in the 1400s and lasted for hundreds of years. The database on the slave trade attest to the fact that there were more American Indians taken to African than there were Africans brought to America. DNA testing needs to be reassessed because it doesn't match the historical record
There is this rejection of the idea that Humanity started in America, even though the presence of A was there. Adam was did not start in Africa at all according haplogroup.
Suppose the sperm whales were the beginning of human origin, and suppose the earth was warm 6000 years ago and there were sperm whales in the Arctic Ocean.🐳Then please reanalyze the migration routes of the haplogroups.🧬 Can mutations create black skin? 👩🏻🤝👨🏿
With Haplogroups, you have one that branches off from a evolutionary starting point. If you want to learn what is the best DNA test for those with African heritage, check out this video: th-cam.com/video/SFx_AHU__Tw/w-d-xo.html
How do you know L came first? What if it is just dominant gene? What if U was actually first but is recessive? For example, what if U existed long before L. But when people from L married into U, their gene was dominant and that’s what stayed? What if we all come from different species of human who intermixed with forms of L but not that we all come from L? That would make more sense wouldn’t it? And instead of “adaptations” it is showing mixtures of coding that happens when two groups meet and intermarriage happens. Because we’ve unearthed humans from Greece who predate humans from Africa. So that makes this L theory wrong.
I'm pretty sure you're talking about the remains of Apidama1 and 2 found in greece. It doesn't Make the L theory wrong it just pushes the timeline up. The Scientist believed that human migration left africa 200,000 years after it began. The finding of the skulls show that it would have been 10,000 years earlier IF that dna is homosapien. But the African skulls are 300,000 years old. Still the oldest. The greek remains of (Apidama1) are still 290,000 years younger than the remains found in Africa And they were also found beside Neanderthal remains which most likely they are both neanderthal meaning not homosapien. So conclusion 1 is that if a group left for greece earlier than they had thought. Those remains still link back to africa. All oldest remains are still on the African Continent. Conclusion 2 The remains are 100% Neanderthal species and not related to homosapiens. We know The other species of humans Are extinct being Neanderthals and Denisovans. They Know we all came from africa because our species of DNA all comes back Homo-sapiens and we have Neanderthal and Denisovan dna remains to compare. Just like the the one possibly 2 found in greece. There are also traces of Neanderthal and Denisovan dna found in some people today. So they have that for comparison as well and would be able to determine The Greek Anthropologist who found the remains and many other achievements Katerina Harvati states a lot of this stuff in her books. There was very little to no admixture from other species Denisovan and Neanderthal. Some believe we killed most of them.
Who says that they predate humans from Africa? That would be a scientific sensation and history is sometimes politizied for nationalistic purposes and no one is genically pure people mixed there was slavery and the first stone age farmers in Europe were from the middle east ,people moved all over and mixed and even if a old skeleton is found in an area today that does not mean that all people in that country or area are the same or that the person the skeleton belongs to was from that area ,that person could have come from far away but died were the skeleton was found.
@@aramisone7198 lots of research and archeology is proving that humans, as we know them now, come from Southern Europe. Not Africa. The Africa theory is the false narrative being supported by Uninversities. Bones from Greece are older and DNA testing reveals that they’re Caucasian. Many red haired. But we can’t be certain we know the origin because this planet is so old. We could’ve had, theoretically, several evolutions, human species emerge and then are killed off and a new one emerges. And the continents have all shifted over time. Some say universities are hiding or downplaying a human race of giants (who had red hair) that predate us. And while it seems mythical, we find evidence that almost everything from paleo times was larger, from reptiles to elephants and tigers. Even ants. If humanity emerged then, the bodies were also gigantic. But they all died off or, as the climate and food shifted, they got shorter and shorter. In any case, my point is, this is making the assumption that we know which gene came first just off an assumption. I want to know how to prove it. And I don’t think we can. We can’t prove, by DNA, which gene came first. But if we combine it with these old bones and findings from southern Europe, it seems to suggest that humans as we know them now, originated in southern Europe and later went to Africa and adapted to that climate by going darker, because UV is more intense in the southern hemisphere. And that becomes dominant. For the body to produce more melanin for sun protection becomes dominant. But the recessive gene came first.
I can't take this guy seriously when he thinks that America is the newest people. He's so behind. America has the oldest societies. The Olmecs, Aztecs, Mayans and the oldest pyramids and mound cities. We didn't migrate from Africa. I came here for an answer to what is a haplogroup but I will have to look elsewhere!!
He doesn't say Americans are the "newest people" which is a meaningless concept anyway. Societies don't correlate neatly with patterns of heredity because culture is not transmitted genetically and all societies are constantly changing, merging, diverging, exchanging with other populations. All living humans descend from African groups within the last 100kya or less, but that doesn't mean they all migrated directly from Africa. Indigenous Americans derive from Northeast Asians & indigenous Australians from Southeast Asians, but NOT from the current inhabitants of those regions. Cultures do not retain their identities over such lengths of time.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pZbsSDRrmXA/mqdefault.jpg)
I had my mtDNA tested in hopes of finding information about my matrilineal "alien" 2nd great-grandmother (thank you for trying to help me with her, by the way). I shouldn't have been surprised when the mtDNA haplogroup turned out to be a rare one. 23andMe says my haplogroup is U6 and rare on their site. There is only one other person on my match list has it (aside from my daughter).
FTDNA is where I had the full sequence mtDNA done and they said it is U6b2. One of the other websites (maybe mitoydna, but I can't remember) says that I am now in the new haplogroup U6b2a, which I suppose is even more rare than U6b2.
No matter where I turn, there are obstacles in regards to finding the parents of that great-great grandmother. At least it's not boring!
Have a blessed weekend.
Isn't genetic genealogy fun?!?!? Or fun #@$#Q$QE!!
@@FamilyHistoryFanatics Yes, both fun and aggravating. haha
Hi sir, so what happens to the human dna when inyected with the cv ja b?
Thank you for this video. I'm only now beginning to jump in and figure out all of this DNA stuff. It's so confusing. Basic question for "Dummies" = What causes the 'mutations' you referred to as each group migrated? Thanks!
It's recombination of our genes when a zygote is created at the cellular level. Check out my explanation using Legos to demonstrate the changes th-cam.com/video/1Cikj7FI6YM/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for simplifying things.😁✌
Any idea what would cause no subclaves showing on a dna test? I tested Haplogroup R but no subclaves as they stated there are no mutations that would cause subclaves so I'm only R. I'm so confused lol.
I answered this in a live video. It takes a few minutes to explain. th-cam.com/video/4MbVgJYwVxQ/w-d-xo.html
I have a question. Why do the names of haplogroups keep changing? When and why did J1e begin to be called J1-P58?
As researchers find out mutation points that create new genetic branches, they will add more letters. Notice, that it's still J and even J1.
@@FamilyHistoryFanatics Thank you. How long does it take for a mutation to happen?
Also, is the J that's found in Dagestan in the Caucasus the same as the J that's found on the Arabian Peninsula? Are the two related? Sorry for asking so many questions. Just trying to understand how this works.
@@spreadertruth8238 Yes they are nearly connected
I took a dna test from MyHeritage and I wanted to download my raw dna data, but I’m not able to do it. Can you tell me how I can do so?
Did you watch the video about how to download your RAW DNA? th-cam.com/video/-Z4vyKuSXa4/w-d-xo.html
If you're of different Haplogroup, doesn't that mean then that we're of different subspecies?
It’s more like a pheno type like a Eurasian kestrel vs a North American.
the answer to your question is, no.
You inherit different haplogroups from each parent.
You're not a separate subspecies from each of your parents
My moms Haplogroup is T2a1b,could you please explain why i have this Haplogroup and Where or Which people we came from
Hi there U have this haplogroup because of the first ancestor having the mutation subclades T2a1b and this origin is widely spread to different countries this haplogroup is mostly common in western Europe/iberia but it could represent other countries too as the first person of that mutation was living in iberia between africa
Great series-- thank you for the map. I much prefer to do my genealogical research from sources that are least likely to be biased-- not that that's prevalent in this line of research. Are haplotypes determined by the sheer number of mutations, or is it a function of the severity of the phenotype shift and impact on survival?
I noticed that C started so close to ADAM and after three mutations stayed the same all the way to North America. Quite different from Q though which was more complex.
Thank you for the presentation. It’s useful. I only have a question: can we witness a mutation from one haplogroup to another? For instance, someone’s haplogroup is A-m32, can he or his great offspring one day shift to B or any other downstream haplogroups? Does being on a haplogroup mean you’re permanently on that haplogroup? I’m not here asking about branching under the same haplogroup
No. You inherit your Y-DNA haplogroup from your father. Another haplogroup would be someone else's father, and you can't inherit it from anyone other than your father, even if they are an ancestor. Maternal haplogroups are the same through your mother.
On the other hand, haplogroups do change over time, and, for example R1b-P297 changed in the Bronze Age or earlier to R1b-L51. But it didn't or couldn't change to an R1a haplogroup, or something like that. That would be the equivalent to a dog having a baby that was a horse.
Ur haplogroup is inherited and having mutation can change it but that doesn't mean it will change Ur ancestor
It could mutate but this happens over thousands of years. Regardless, B is a specific mutation which is unlikely to be repeated again
@@muhammedal-asiri1944 yes it's unlikely but it can happen
@@muhammedal-asiri1944 also homo sapiens also inherited haplogroups mutations from their parents it's not permanent it can change
My mtDna is J2b1a2 however my mom and aunt are J2b1a I've looked around online and I dont understand why I have a 2 on the end of mine but my mom doesn't. Also mtDna J2 and Ydna J2 are not the same correct? Why have the same name?
It is because they tested your haplogroup in more detail. Your mother also has a 2 in the end but the testing company didn't go into that much detail. I assume you used two different services?
And yes mt dna is different from Y dna
mt dna is maternal lineage while y dna is paternal lineage you share with your father
Question my haplogroup is L1c3b google says it’s highest concentration is among pygmies so would that mean I could be directly related to some pygmies in Africa ?
If u aren't currently from pigmy(hunter gatherers)most of whom aren't on digital media
That haplogroup was formed before modern pigmy and ur tribe or race
@ivryparadise1488
How tall are You, Your father and mother, brothers and sisters and your children ?
I know a television star namer Petitjean
( shortjohn), a typical medieval sobriquet. And he is effectively 1 .47 m tall !
can someone tell me more about paternal haplogroup R-DF101 ?
All that most people know about is on this page haplogroup.org/ystory/r-df101/
You are likely of Celtic western European descend on your father's side
What was the name of the research project with the Native Americans
Great info.
Glad it was helpful!
Hello! I really enjoyed your video.. Could I ask a question though?
I have recieved my father's haplogroup which is I-L38. Does this mean that the earliest family origins of my family go back to the time of this mutation?
So say ' I' goes back to the last glacial Maximum before this I was J, does this mean that my family tree could go back to after the mutation but no further?
Thanking you
The haplogroup and mutations give you rough ideas of the paths of migrations for your genetic ancestors. Your family tree will only extend as far as you can build it using genetic relatives (through cousin matching) and genealogical records. However, I would caution against doing deep ancestral research until you've validated your 16 great-granparental lines.
Can physical environment (locations) cause or result into a haplogroups mutation?
Yes because the environment is basically pressuring some of your workings in body
It says that my paternal haplotype is G-L660 and that my paternal DNA is most commonly found in Sardinia. Will this be my actual paternal lineage?
Yes unless the company messed it up. Take a second test to be sure.
Also keep in mind haplogroups are found almost all over the world. G is not exclusive to Sardinia, It has even been found in Egypt close to you, so it is not far fetched
Do u know if Y haplogroup e1b1a mutated to give birth to e1b1b?because the kushitic have e1b1b and bantu have e1b1a
And e1b1b is found in east Africa somalia
Did e1b1a originate in east Africa or mutation happened after they arrived in cameroun west africa
That is beyond my scope of interest. I would recommend doing a Google search for the questions you have. There are some great resources that way.
Is there a specific area where haplogroup L2b2 comes from? Or is it generally all over Africa? Great video btw!
According to haplogroup.org/, the current origin is unknown. However, you can see some really great graphics about haplogroup 'family trees' on Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mitochondrial_DNA_haplogroup
THANKYOU
You're welcome.
how many haplogroup trees are there?
There's one tree with many branches off of the starting person. Learn more here www.familytreedna.com/public/y-dna-haplotree
Is that only from Y DNA
Haplogroups are Y-DNA and mtDNA
Can the same mutation occur in different parts of the world in different periods of time? 😅 does it mean that this group of people are (or were) more prone to have mutations?))
Hi love yes they are prone because as humans migrated out of Africa environmental pressures changed their haplogroups
I understand the hablogroups but not sure to how it’s important to your dna? I Guess Im confused because even though we migrate from certain areas we have different dna from a different ethnic background. Just confusing
No one has "pure blood" people moved ,mixed and slavery was normal so slave women got pregnant and also after rape in wars , genetic mutation so an ethnic group is never 100% the same genetically.
QUEŠTIONS:
What does the mutation do ? What does it transmit ?
susceptibility to say "diabetes" or " green eyes" , "stature" ? telligence/ intelligence ? " skills ? character ?
THAT is what we are interested to !
I descend 23 times from Charlemagne, Ludwig der Fromme, down to Karl Martel, the Musulslayer.
Should I worry about going to be a musulslayer ? And if this were the case, could a CRISPR intervention on my mutation knock it out ?
THAT is WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW !!!
Which genes are affected by those mutations : autosomal, mitochondrial, X or Y ?
The CRISPR gene repair method could allow a homogeneisation of jumanity into patient, easy, social, happy dudes.
OR NOT ?
23andMe tells me I’m K1a3a - same as you Andy - and presumably millions of others!
Quite possibly.
Im paternal r1a1 and maternal b2.
i found a website describing the heritage of local lastnames in a region between montenegro and serbia. The website says that the people tested in montenegro (with my lastname) have the haplogroup G-Z2026, and the ones in turkey (also with the same lastname as mine) have the haplogoup R-Y13891. But looking up haplogroups in the internet i only find shorter ones. I dont know how i can use the information i found for further research. Can someone help me out?
The haplogroup G is andemic to the region, the first agricultors of Anatolia had it and G-Z2026 must be a subclade of G (Subclade meaning mutation). Regarding R it has origins in Eurasia. There is other mutations of R who also migrated massively in Europe wich are R1a and R1b. Most important thing, haplogroup on Y-Dna doesn't define your genom but only your lineage from your father
They are likely descended from two different men with the same name.
For example many Englishmen have the surname Smith despite not being related. So naturally they would have different lineages
I have a question that you cannot answer
What happened to Haplogroup J? Never mind, I saw it. 😉
Glad you found your answer.
Can you share the name of these studies that led to the creation of haplogroups. I have some reservations about the directions of these studies. It seems the people who are conducting these studies aren't aware of some migrations that took place in the 1400s and the 1500s. Starting with Columbus he took as many Arawak Indians as he could to Europe and Africa to sell as slaves'. The Portuguese did the same in the 1500s to tribes in Canada. Many Brazilians were taken to Angola and other locations in west africa. Somehow this is never considered when they create these haplogroups. These American Indians have descendants alive today in africa. Some are in the political arena. You wouldn't be able to look at them and differentiate them from other Africans. However their grandparents or great grandparents were Brazilians or sometimes described as Portuguese since that's who they came with. Known as Luso Africans. The DNA data does not match the historical records of migration and this needs to be corrected.
This is not to be scoffed at. DNA research took off in the 80s whereas these migrations of American Indians to Africa and Europe began in the 1400s and lasted for hundreds of years. The database on the slave trade attest to the fact that there were more American Indians taken to African than there were Africans brought to America. DNA testing needs to be reassessed because it doesn't match the historical record
Im somali 75% haplogroups
There is this rejection of the idea that Humanity started in America, even though the presence of A was there. Adam was did not start in Africa at all according haplogroup.
The Americas aren't the last to be inhabited. It goes back to 32k years ago
Suppose the sperm whales were the beginning of human origin, and suppose the earth was warm 6000 years ago and there were sperm whales in the Arctic Ocean.🐳Then please reanalyze the migration routes of the haplogroups.🧬
Can mutations create black skin? 👩🏻🤝👨🏿
Perhaps a review of a biology class, with an emphasize on the evolutionary family tree for living things would be the next videos for you to watch.
You mean I am a mutant? Just kidding, thank you very much!
Why are mine only in Africa… as African American should I show up all over
What test did you take?
With Haplogroups, you have one that branches off from a evolutionary starting point.
If you want to learn what is the best DNA test for those with African heritage, check out this video: th-cam.com/video/SFx_AHU__Tw/w-d-xo.html
Cri genetics
No it's done by design. They don't want us to know our true identity. Science is sorcery.
@Jtve737 So if you don't trust science, I presume that you forego the use of all modern technologies, since they are the product of science.
my y-dna is E1B1B
Awesome.
Are u somali or Ethiopia
@@bentutsibensamale7520 Somali
Шарлатанство.
How do you know L came first? What if it is just dominant gene? What if U was actually first but is recessive?
For example, what if U existed long before L. But when people from L married into U, their gene was dominant and that’s what stayed?
What if we all come from different species of human who intermixed with forms of L but not that we all come from L? That would make more sense wouldn’t it? And instead of “adaptations” it is showing mixtures of coding that happens when two groups meet and intermarriage happens.
Because we’ve unearthed humans from Greece who predate humans from Africa. So that makes this L theory wrong.
I'm pretty sure you're talking about the remains of Apidama1 and 2 found in greece. It doesn't Make the L theory wrong it just pushes the timeline up.
The Scientist believed that human migration left africa 200,000 years after it began. The finding of the skulls show that it would have been 10,000 years earlier IF that dna is homosapien. But the African skulls are 300,000 years old. Still the oldest. The greek remains of (Apidama1) are still 290,000 years younger than the remains found in Africa And they were also found beside Neanderthal remains which most likely they are both neanderthal meaning not homosapien.
So conclusion 1 is that if a group left for greece earlier than they had thought. Those remains still link back to africa. All oldest remains are still on the African Continent.
Conclusion 2 The remains are 100% Neanderthal species and not related to homosapiens.
We know The other species of humans Are extinct being Neanderthals and Denisovans. They Know we all came from africa because our species of DNA all comes back Homo-sapiens and we have Neanderthal and Denisovan dna remains to compare. Just like the the one possibly 2 found in greece. There are also traces of Neanderthal and Denisovan dna found in some people today. So they have that for comparison as well and would be able to determine
The Greek Anthropologist who found the remains and many other achievements Katerina Harvati states a lot of this stuff in her books. There was very little to no admixture from other species Denisovan and Neanderthal. Some believe we killed most of them.
Who says that they predate humans from Africa? That would be a scientific sensation and history is sometimes politizied for nationalistic purposes and no one is genically pure people mixed there was slavery and the first stone age farmers in Europe were from the middle east ,people moved all over and mixed and even if a old skeleton is found in an area today that does not mean that all people in that country or area are the same or that the person the skeleton belongs to was from that area ,that person could have come from far away but died were the skeleton was found.
@@aramisone7198 lots of research and archeology is proving that humans, as we know them now, come from Southern Europe. Not Africa. The Africa theory is the false narrative being supported by Uninversities.
Bones from Greece are older and DNA testing reveals that they’re Caucasian. Many red haired.
But we can’t be certain we know the origin because this planet is so old. We could’ve had, theoretically, several evolutions, human species emerge and then are killed off and a new one emerges. And the continents have all shifted over time.
Some say universities are hiding or downplaying a human race of giants (who had red hair) that predate us. And while it seems mythical, we find evidence that almost everything from paleo times was larger, from reptiles to elephants and tigers. Even ants. If humanity emerged then, the bodies were also gigantic. But they all died off or, as the climate and food shifted, they got shorter and shorter.
In any case, my point is, this is making the assumption that we know which gene came first just off an assumption. I want to know how to prove it. And I don’t think we can. We can’t prove, by DNA, which gene came first. But if we combine it with these old bones and findings from southern Europe, it seems to suggest that humans as we know them now, originated in southern Europe and later went to Africa and adapted to that climate by going darker, because UV is more intense in the southern hemisphere. And that becomes dominant. For the body to produce more melanin for sun protection becomes dominant. But the recessive gene came first.
Stop saying that person. Because its more likely that person's children or grandchildren that migranted to a new area.
It s only a name.
I can't take this guy seriously when he thinks that America is the newest people. He's so behind. America has the oldest societies. The Olmecs, Aztecs, Mayans and the oldest pyramids and mound cities. We didn't migrate from Africa. I came here for an answer to what is a haplogroup but I will have to look elsewhere!!
He doesn't say Americans are the "newest people" which is a meaningless concept anyway. Societies don't correlate neatly with patterns of heredity because culture is not transmitted genetically and all societies are constantly changing, merging, diverging, exchanging with other populations. All living humans descend from African groups within the last 100kya or less, but that doesn't mean they all migrated directly from Africa. Indigenous Americans derive from Northeast Asians & indigenous Australians from Southeast Asians, but NOT from the current inhabitants of those regions. Cultures do not retain their identities over such lengths of time.
America was only populated after the other continents. That's what he is saying. Native Americans came from Siberia which is in Asia