An Interview with Filmmaker John Little -

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 58

  • @SiavashSaadlou
    @SiavashSaadlou ปีที่แล้ว +25

    John Little is amazing. I wish people like Joe Rogan would give him the opportunity to set the record straight on many Bruce Lee stories.

    • @zibtihaj3213
      @zibtihaj3213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines care to explain

    • @dendanskehelt4296
      @dendanskehelt4296 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zibtihaj3213 He doesn't explain anything. Nor does he prove anything or back anything up. He shows up everywhere where Mike Mentzer is mentioned and spews nonsense and lies. He's a jew basically.

    • @MrDravenLee
      @MrDravenLee ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Highly unlikely considering he had access to all Bruce Lee's notes day timers etc It seems to me that some people are dead set on disbelieving Bruce's abilities. Jealousy or ignorance are obviously the factors.

    • @MrDravenLee
      @MrDravenLee ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Fair enough but he had access to Bruce Lee material as well as witnesses. I don't know what evidence if indeed he had any with Steve Reeves.

    • @axelstone3131
      @axelstone3131 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rogan lives in an echo chamber regarding martial arts. He only knows about combat sports. He’s clueless about self defence/warfare/military applications of martial art aka what they were originally intended to be and how Bruce Lee practiced and taught. He’s clueless, like most people about what Bruce Lee was actually doing.

  • @ThomasMarxJKD
    @ThomasMarxJKD ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love Supernatural! Cheers to Mark!!

  • @DaleOct23
    @DaleOct23 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:50 into this video & WOW! Way to go John, that's cool. We can clearly see how integrity can pay off

  • @axelstone3131
    @axelstone3131 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    57:20 for Bruce Lee info

  • @nakotaapache4674
    @nakotaapache4674 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks to john little for his energy to open and describing spirits and make them visible for us so we can learn and integrate it to our life for living a fullfilled ourselfes.

    • @axelstone3131
      @axelstone3131 ปีที่แล้ว

      What the fuck are you talking about

  • @jessieodawa
    @jessieodawa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great interview guys!

  • @ElaijahModarro
    @ElaijahModarro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really fascinating

  • @jonathancross781
    @jonathancross781 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks. Enjoyed the content, Keep it up.

  • @ericstew5086
    @ericstew5086 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great stuff

  • @ElaijahModarro
    @ElaijahModarro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    th-cam.com/users/fredneets
    John Little's channel for convenience

  • @johncarroll772
    @johncarroll772 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still dont get this , in my experience l lose strength if l only bench once every 7 days .

    • @RayceJacobson
      @RayceJacobson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      weekly PRs are for intermediate lifters. novices need to train 2 or 3 times a week.

  • @EvaK7
    @EvaK7 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍🏻

  • @craigbrown4414
    @craigbrown4414 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's easy for guys like chuck norris and bob wall to talk smack about Bruce lee, when he's not here to defend himself!!😡

    • @cuzz63
      @cuzz63 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not as if he would have done anything.

  • @ken2000X
    @ken2000X 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rucka Rucka Ali?

  • @johncarroll772
    @johncarroll772 ปีที่แล้ว

    HlT is preferable for older guys 🤔 l only see more injuries 😢

    • @WizzdummHeadley
      @WizzdummHeadley ปีที่แล้ว

      It absolutely is without question as it's low force/no or very low momentum training utilizing slow paces with statics & such .

    • @RayceJacobson
      @RayceJacobson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      because training to failure is anathema to older populations. training to failure is hard to recover from even for young bucks. without steroids, you can't recover from that easily.

  • @WizzdummHeadley
    @WizzdummHeadley ปีที่แล้ว

    Really enjoy JL & have listened/read much of his work on exercise but when the subject of BL comes up it seems to me that he may in fact be caught up in idolism!!!??? BL may have in fact been a powerful/athletic man HOWEVER none of these tall tales have any evidence but A LOT of hearsay & very interestingly Bruce's Aunt was a Ho-Tung one of the wealthiest clans in China, along with his father being of similar stock from an acting/theater family so that seriously calls into question the rags to riches narrative we've all been told!!???

    • @chrisbach1533
      @chrisbach1533 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That thing with Bruce s connection to the Bosman family is very questionable.
      In October 2020, the chinese-canadian Lee-Biographer Yingbiao Feng stated this claim by Matt Polly is simply wrong. According to Matt, Bruce and his family were connected to a Mr. Charles Bosman, a dutch man with german roots who moved later to China.
      Bruce's mother Grace Ho had a father named Komtong Ho. And this guy was the brother of a guy named "Robert Hotung". Robert Tung Ho-Bosman (Robert is his western given name, Tung his chinese given name, Ho his chinese family name, Bosman his western family name), who was the son of Moses "Charles" Henry Maurice Bosman.
      Problem is: Yingbiao Feng pointed out Robert and Komtong were half brothers but not full brothers, they had different fathers.
      If this is true, then Komtong, his daughter Grace, and his grandson Bruce arent connected with the dutch Bosman family, only his half brother Robert would be.
      Of course to me its not possible for me to check out if Robert and Komtong were only half brothers or full brothers.
      But at least as you can see here, the Wikipedia article of Robert Hotung aka Robert Tung Ho-Bosman says he and Komtong were indeed only half brothers, "maternal half-brother", which means they had the same mother but a different father:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hotung#Family
      Robert had a full brother named Fook, but Komtong was as it seems only his half brother, and they had a different father. And if this is true, Komtong and his grandson Bruce have zero connection to the jewish Mr. Bosman, only Komtong's half brother Robert has.
      Name: Robert Tung Ho-Bosman, known as Robert Hotung:
      Father: Charles Henry Maurice Bosman
      Mother: Tai Sze
      Name: Komtong Ho (Bruce's grandfather, Grace's father):
      Father: Unknown
      Mother: Tai Sze
      Thats how it seems to be. Of course i cant prove it 100%.
      But this underlines Bruce Junfan Lee's connection to this Ho-Bosman clan (Ho-Tung is wrong, Tung was the chinese given name of Robert Tung Ho-Bosman, and Ho was his chinese family name) is most probably untrue.

    • @WizzdummHeadley
      @WizzdummHeadley 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrisbach1533Well it wouldn't surprise me one bit if BL did in fact come from wealth regardless if the names are perhaps mixed up here & there, Linda Cadwell-Lee herself comes from a similar background as well.

    • @chrisbach1533
      @chrisbach1533 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WizzdummHeadley Sure his family wasnt poor. But most probably he had nothing to do with the Ho-Bosman family.

    • @WizzdummHeadley
      @WizzdummHeadley 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrisbach1533Very interestingly the Jewish Sassoon family also has very DEEP ties into Chinese "nobility" as well, so once again taking nepotism into account & the very significant role it plays in the world it would seem highly unlikely that Bruce came from humble beginnings!!!???

    • @WizzdummHeadley
      @WizzdummHeadley 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrisbach1533Are you sure about that???!!!

  • @abanger
    @abanger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd be skeptical of anybody promoting Mentzer as a reputable source. He claimed to be an Objectivist, but his methodology was entirely rationalistic. Better to follow evidence-based practitioners like Lyle McDonald, who properly use an inductive approach.

    • @GungFuIsGungFu
      @GungFuIsGungFu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Can you elaborate on how/why Mike Mentzer was not evidence-based in his research and approach to productive weight-training for muscle growth - compared to Lyle McDonald ?

    • @abanger
      @abanger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GungFuIsGungFu Bryan Haycock of HST fame said it best:
      "I used HIT-type training principles before I began to analyze muscle-cell research. It should be understood that HIT and Heavy Duty are not based on muscle-cell physiology. HIT and HD are actually based on Selye's GAS (General Adaptation Syndrome) more than anything. Jones and Mentzer loved to talk about philosophy and logic, but seldom ever mentioned a sarcolemma, MAPk, myogenic stem cells, or even such obvious things as intracellular IGF-1. The reasons they chose to ignore such basic principles of muscle cell physiology remain with them."

    • @stevecunningham8889
      @stevecunningham8889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. Does the same apply to Doug McGuff in your experience?

    • @abanger
      @abanger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stevecunningham8889 I only saw his presentation on the Objective Standard Institute channel, but he similarly recommends Mentzer. Most of the general health advice I've heard from fellow Objectivists has been utterly ignorant.

    • @WizzdummHeadley
      @WizzdummHeadley ปีที่แล้ว

      Well as far as Mentzer's approach to bodybuilding/strength training it is valid without question in the root principles intensity/duration/frequency as far as Rand/objectivism well that's an entirely other matter !?