I know people say this a lot but 0:50 might actually be the worst free kick ever paid, and there are some real contenders (including in this video). I would love the umpire to explain why that was a free kick. Not just saying "in the back!". These were the bad old days where the AFL treated a man's back with the same caution you would an infant's still-developing cranium.
Criminal to leave out the Freo v St Kilda one, I think Bradley Hill got pinged for holding the ball after about 1sec of possession but the Freo player before him got off Scot-free for a clear holding the ball call… don’t remember what year that was, just remember it’s about the worst call I’ve ever seen
dissent (while a good point, was handled atrociously) and the 'giving the ball back to the umpire bs from this year have been the worst handled implementation of rules ever... Also, the vic bias is strong in this video
I am a GC suns fan and that Mac Andrew free kick against Ben king was just ridiculous because they were both pushing and pulling each other and the play was about 80 to 100 meters away. Just a stupid decision with the time that was left not worthy of a free shot at goal and proved the difference in the game. So infuriating 😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬
let's be real, it get's paid for "time wasting" right? explain to me how a stopped clock + already set up defense is time wasting. not to mention it's actually quicker cause he likely doesn't know where the ump is but daicos clearly does so he hands it off to him to give to the ump. that stupid rule needs to be altered to where context can actually apply so umpires dont catch fire with horribly written rules.
@@sad_eagles_supporter7186 because by passing it to a teammate that delays the ball getting back to the umpire, which gives himself time to get set up. Here's a really clear question for you, does the rule say you can pass it to a teammate? No? Didn't think so.
@LiamBriggs18 crazy how I said it should be altered. people just don't read nowadays 🤦♂️. also that split second between him giving it to daicos instead of the umpire will not affect his ability to set up nor the play itself in general. had he saw the umpire then give it to daicos or delay the give to daicos I could understand but it was an immediate toss to daicos which is why I believe it's unfair and needs to be changed so this doesn't happen again.
And after that free kick bald headed Nicholls paid for not getting the ball back to him, he’s hasn’t umpired a magpies game since. I’d go even further and blacklist him from the game for life.
Correct he hasn't been near Collingwood since, and he also never got a gig during the finals. I reckon the UA were really pissed off about that decision with Sidebottom and so they should have been
The saints one against the sun's was one of the worst calls ever watch it lived not going for either team made me so mad they need to fire all afl umpires
As an Aussie, I can't be more embarrassed to say that this is our national sport. And that the AFL sets the standard. 😂😂😂 there are many reasons why no other countries adopt the sport. It's a joke the way it's run in Australia
it's crazy cause it's not even time wasting because the clock is stopped and the defense is already flooded. not to mention it's quicker cause he's just got up and has no idea where the ump is but daicos does. it's a ridiculous free and should not have been paid and ultimately cost them the game
Also after receiving the ball off the ground the umpire asks players to nominate… which wastes more time. Absolutely dumb rule that adds nothing but frustration to the game
The AFL needs to fix their umpiring! You know its bad when even the commentators are arguing.
It’s been shit for 20 years, and yet the AFL still keeps hiring clueless people into important positions such as umpiring etc
Haha. I think maybe a four minute video over thousands of hours of play shouldn’t give you that impression
I know people say this a lot but 0:50 might actually be the worst free kick ever paid, and there are some real contenders (including in this video). I would love the umpire to explain why that was a free kick. Not just saying "in the back!".
These were the bad old days where the AFL treated a man's back with the same caution you would an infant's still-developing cranium.
Criminal to leave out the Freo v St Kilda one, I think Bradley Hill got pinged for holding the ball after about 1sec of possession but the Freo player before him got off Scot-free for a clear holding the ball call… don’t remember what year that was, just remember it’s about the worst call I’ve ever seen
notice how most of these involve hawthorn, lol
#freekickhawthorn
do umpires win a team 3 in a row????
@@maddog-vq9pm yes
dissent (while a good point, was handled atrociously) and the 'giving the ball back to the umpire bs from this year have been the worst handled implementation of rules ever...
Also, the vic bias is strong in this video
I am a GC suns fan and that Mac Andrew free kick against Ben king was just ridiculous because they were both pushing and pulling each other and the play was about 80 to 100 meters away. Just a stupid decision with the time that was left not worthy of a free shot at goal and proved the difference in the game. So infuriating 😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬
The bump out of the marking contest at 1:00 is 100% correct.
This is not a soccer Vedeo budd
why don't you show Big O's ruck infringement free that gifted the roos the lead, Big O was just on his revenge arc
Facts
@@harrywillett4714 im in thick of it and everybody knows
Free to Darcy was correct. People can complain that it's called inconsistently, but it doesn't suddenly make the call incorrect.
let's be real, it get's paid for "time wasting" right? explain to me how a stopped clock + already set up defense is time wasting. not to mention it's actually quicker cause he likely doesn't know where the ump is but daicos clearly does so he hands it off to him to give to the ump. that stupid rule needs to be altered to where context can actually apply so umpires dont catch fire with horribly written rules.
@@sad_eagles_supporter7186 because by passing it to a teammate that delays the ball getting back to the umpire, which gives himself time to get set up.
Here's a really clear question for you, does the rule say you can pass it to a teammate? No? Didn't think so.
@LiamBriggs18 crazy how I said it should be altered. people just don't read nowadays 🤦♂️. also that split second between him giving it to daicos instead of the umpire will not affect his ability to set up nor the play itself in general. had he saw the umpire then give it to daicos or delay the give to daicos I could understand but it was an immediate toss to daicos which is why I believe it's unfair and needs to be changed so this doesn't happen again.
U missed the Zurhaar one against Collingwood
And after that free kick bald headed Nicholls paid for not getting the ball back to him, he’s hasn’t umpired a magpies game since.
I’d go even further and blacklist him from the game for life.
Correct he hasn't been near Collingwood since, and he also never got a gig during the finals. I reckon the UA were really pissed off about that decision with Sidebottom and so they should have been
The saints one against the sun's was one of the worst calls ever watch it lived not going for either team made me so mad they need to fire all afl umpires
A whole heap of these are fine...
Surely do a part 2
yes i will get one done as quickly as possible
@@Kaleen_YT my guy.
Just because you didn’t give the ball to the umpire is a stupid free kick
2:39 that rule should be abolished, no logic in it
just further proving that the afl match fix by favouring victorians.
i dont know of a game where they change the rules every year!!!!!!!!
That’s a rule 2:40
Look, I hate Collingwood as much as the next guy, but nah... 2:37 is too much.
it is the rules tho
@@alexjones9038 True, I didn't say it wasn't in the rules..
The umpires favourite the forwards
must be a gollingwood supporter the freo collingwood one is always a free
As an Aussie, I can't be more embarrassed to say that this is our national sport. And that the AFL sets the standard. 😂😂😂 there are many reasons why no other countries adopt the sport. It's a joke the way it's run in Australia
First
2:39 while harsh, is still a free kick
it's crazy cause it's not even time wasting because the clock is stopped and the defense is already flooded. not to mention it's quicker cause he's just got up and has no idea where the ump is but daicos does. it's a ridiculous free and should not have been paid and ultimately cost them the game
Also after receiving the ball off the ground the umpire asks players to nominate… which wastes more time. Absolutely dumb rule that adds nothing but frustration to the game
@christopherryan7780 yeah true i didn't think of that
Half of these aren't even incorrect lol wtf
thats why theyre bad decisions?