Simple HTTPs for Docker! // Traefik Tutorial (updated)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 206

  • @mithubopensourcelab482
    @mithubopensourcelab482 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Probably this is best video on Traefik.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much! :)

  • @msnowman
    @msnowman หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This was fantastic. I tried to setup traefik a few months ago but didn't ever get it to work. It works now and I switched all my containers to it. Thank you!

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Awesome! Glad it helped you :)

  • @plasticpippo201
    @plasticpippo201 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    this video about trafik is much better than the first one you made

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much! Appreciate it :)

  • @flwyd
    @flwyd หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love your video, I was having a hard time understanding traefik via their docs, and now everything makes sense thanks to you.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh I'm glad you say this! Thank you :)

  • @JorgeRamirez01
    @JorgeRamirez01 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What a journey, but thanks to your video I was able to configure traefik, portainer and pihole... so far, so good with my new adventure setting up my home lab. Thanks!

  • @ghangj
    @ghangj หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the best video on Traefik. I have Traefik running on Tailscale with nextDNS as my DNS. Loving the fact that i can deply Traefik in mins with all my configs.

  • @cl_0ud470
    @cl_0ud470 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This solves my problem with reverse proxying to a bunch of services defined in a different docker compose. Thank you so much!

  • @romayojr
    @romayojr หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I was using NPM as my reverse proxy when I started my homelab journey over two years ago. I switched to Traefik because it challenged me to understand how it works. Now I have all my services running on it with Pihole as internal DNS and Cloudflare for external. I appreciate you updating your Traefik tutorial 🤝

    • @ManelRodero
      @ManelRodero หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can you explain a little more about PiHole and Cloudflare? Can you give an example of a service and how you define it in each of them? Thanks.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome! Yeah, NPM is honestly not a great project imo, it's a good idea to migrate :)

    • @gocygo01
      @gocygo01 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christianlempaWhat makes it a subpar option?

  • @xbelthesarx
    @xbelthesarx หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Fantastic video, Christian. Something I've discovered over time is that I can reduce the verbosity of my config by providing some sane defaults in my provider config to do things like specifying the docker network to use, as well as the ability to use custom rules when all of my services are deployed to a domain with a wildcard record like you outlined. I took the opportunity to write these up on my blog, and if it's okay, I can share it in the comments here for you and others to take advantage of.

    • @joshs2022
      @joshs2022 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would be interested in this write up

    • @ManelRodero
      @ManelRodero หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshs2022 Me too ;-)

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the kind words, feel free to share it ;)

    • @its_dhazardous
      @its_dhazardous หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd be interested as well

  • @maikelboom5764
    @maikelboom5764 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you Christian, very helpful as always!

  • @DigiDoc101
    @DigiDoc101 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Perfect timing. Thank you.

  • @SnorreSelmer
    @SnorreSelmer หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic work! Your "old" Traefik video got me up and running with Traefik in Docker, and I love it! Can't wait for your video on Traefik in k8s, since I'm transitioning to k8s in my homelab these days.

  • @MichaelRinghusGertz
    @MichaelRinghusGertz หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for a great video. I have been using Traefik 2.9 untill now, and have for some time now, wanted to move to latest version. I haven't had the time to look into it. This video, made me switch from 2.9 to 3.1 in about on hour. Thanks again.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome! Glad it was helpful :)

  • @BenjaminBenStein
    @BenjaminBenStein 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Best Traefik Video ever

  • @JohnLovell-FTW
    @JohnLovell-FTW หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Lempa to Implementation (Lempamentation) is what I always say. No need to set the speed of the video to 1.5... CL changed his configuration to speak in 1.5 speed :)

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha thank you so much! Appreciate it :D

  • @Seba11PL
    @Seba11PL หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video and it was a pleasure to see updated traefik tutotial. Hope to see more advance tutorial about middlewares etc 😊

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great suggestions! I'll include a basic tutorial about middlewares in my video about authentik + traefik

  • @hectorrios1432
    @hectorrios1432 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Holy smokes! It works! Thank you so much for this great tutorial.

  • @BrianPhillipsSKS
    @BrianPhillipsSKS หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm for that SWAG life. It's so simple and comes integrated with Crowdsec and Fail2Ban

  • @jeucedahn
    @jeucedahn หลายเดือนก่อน

    I always enjoy watching your amazing tutorials. Thanks for sharing.

  • @mal-avcisi9783
    @mal-avcisi9783 หลายเดือนก่อน

    probably the most chaotic video on traefik.

  • @walideshtiwi6303
    @walideshtiwi6303 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you i love the way you explain everything in details

  • @yeastdonkey846
    @yeastdonkey846 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Would love a follow-up that goes through more advanced configuration (such as using Cloudflare origin certs) and label usage.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thank you! I'm planning to add these config steps into other videos where it's needed. For example, if we discuss authentik using middlewares and outposts, stay tuned for this topic coming out next year :)

    • @yeastdonkey846
      @yeastdonkey846 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ awesome, keep up the great work!!

  • @テパチェ
    @テパチェ หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing tutorial, easy to follow. Thank you for sharing.

  • @etherxi
    @etherxi 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for this awesome and easy tutorial. I have just learned from this video after searching more on youtube and google. I am able to setup multiple domain in the same vps using docker. It would be better if you make a load balancer video with docker and traefik

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Glad it was helpful! What would you like to see in a future video?

    • @etherxi
      @etherxi 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @christianlempa thank you for the reply. I would love to learn about setting up the load balancer for multiple vps using traefik and docker.

  • @mateuszkozera9443
    @mateuszkozera9443 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Christian!

  • @kareemschultz
    @kareemschultz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve been using nginx proxy manager for years, but Traefik is very tempting. I just wish it had a nice GUI to make changes instead of editing a bunch of config files.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You just have to get used to the config labels, but if you got your templates I think it's even much faster and easier to configure than in a UI.

  • @mithubopensourcelab482
    @mithubopensourcelab482 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Caddy looks very promising as compared to Traefik.

    • @jameslucas583
      @jameslucas583 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Traefik and Caddy are both excellent and have pros and cons for different situations. Check out Zaroxy as well which is a new kid on the block that I think will be a good option for a lot of home-labbers

    • @danko95bgd
      @danko95bgd หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only annoying thing is that they don't have a k8s gateway api provider unlike traefik. There is something on github but its probably some beta

    • @lucanori97
      @lucanori97 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Out of curiosity, why is it promising compared to traefik? (Asking for a friend which is trying to implement traefik in every single stack 😅)

    • @playeronthebeat
      @playeronthebeat หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I do like Zoraxy! :D
      Currently, for someone like me the best option.
      Maybe I'll give Traefik another try after this video.

    • @MelroyvandenBerg
      @MelroyvandenBerg หลายเดือนก่อน

      Caddy is too slow.

  • @drbyte2009
    @drbyte2009 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great and clear video on traefik !! Thnx

  • @gacjezv
    @gacjezv หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    excellent as always Christian. Question: What if I have multiple servers running docker containers? Do I run a traefik server per server or do I have one and the containers are managed across the network from a single server?
    Thanks

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much! :) I run traefik on each server, since I don't have a better way to transfer the requests from one server to another. Maybe a Docker Swarm setup would be better in this scenario, but that's a topic I might have to look into at some point.

  • @holygod8440
    @holygod8440 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just awesome tutorial

  • @LazyPanda-p9n
    @LazyPanda-p9n หลายเดือนก่อน

    You sir are a legend! Thank you for this brilliant tutorial. I finally learnt what Traefik is and most importantly, got it up and running.. do you have a video on how to setup Authelia with Traefik? that's next for me :)

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you so much!! :) No, there's no Authelia video planned, but I've done a video about authentik, in future videos, I will expand the Traefik + Authentik setup.

    • @LazyPanda-p9n
      @LazyPanda-p9n หลายเดือนก่อน

      @christianlempa that would be wonderful... Thanks for your reply, and will wait for the video

  •  หลายเดือนก่อน

    Danke für das Video. Habe es nun verstanden denk ich.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Das freut mich! 😊👏

  • @mrbend
    @mrbend หลายเดือนก่อน

    Useful, concise. Especially with the boilerplates. Would it be possible you do a video about wildcard certs in traefik with cloudflare?
    You already saved me so much research time with this, and I am really grateful!

  • @ManelRodero
    @ManelRodero หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As always, a very interesting video.
    Now, I would like you to use configurations that are valid in production even if it is for a HomeLab. For example, the UI exposure of port 8080 should be protected. How would this be done?
    Another question you have not addressed is the number of Traefik you have. Do you install one on each server? If so, how do you route to the Dockers that are on other machines? (and that are obviously not on the same network).
    Or how do you route to non-Docker applications?
    I hope you can explain this in the comments or in a new video.
    Thanks for everything you post.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Protecting the UI is a topic for another video. :) Regarding the other questions, I deploy Traefik on each server and I don't route any external services, yet.

  • @mra2202
    @mra2202 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would really love to see the video on deploying and configuring Traefik with TLS certs on Kubernetes.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's coming soon ;)

    • @mra2202
      @mra2202 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @christianlempa Will you be using an Ingress or IngressRoute? I prefer IngressRoute as it's easier to configure.

  • @snopz
    @snopz 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is fantastic! I finally understood Traefik 😅.
    I do have a question, though: In the video, you showed how to configure the Nginx server which is using port 80 for its web interface. How would we set it up for applications that use other ports for their web interface?
    Thank you for your hard work!

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Awesome! You have to modify the labels for the service objects, e.g. traefik.http.services.service.loadbalancer.server.port=3000

  • @SB-qm5wg
    @SB-qm5wg 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    great tutorial.

  • @andrelademannvergissberlin8263
    @andrelademannvergissberlin8263 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A link to your mentioned boilerplate repository in the description would be nice

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's in my docs link

  • @scottmielke4071
    @scottmielke4071 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is incredible

  • @lele-tz1uz
    @lele-tz1uz หลายเดือนก่อน

    love your videos, thanks very helpfull!

  • @magnusnelenius649
    @magnusnelenius649 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very nice! You have a video some months ago showing how to use selfhosted netbird with quick start guide but it would be very interesting putting it behind Traefik and use Authentik instead of Zitadel. Maybe a video on that?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you, great suggestions, but currently I don't have time for it, maybe I need to follow-up on it next year

    • @magnusnelenius649
      @magnusnelenius649 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christianlempa That would be nice!

  • @jeskamstrup
    @jeskamstrup หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Lets Encrypt certificates are usually valid for 90 days. Does Traefik automatically renew the expired certificates that it has created as needed?

    • @sanvi4236
      @sanvi4236 หลายเดือนก่อน

      as of ~2 months ago mine was able to renew them automatically without any extra config. i think letsencrypt also sent an email warning me that they were near expiry so i could keep an eye on it.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep indeed! it does it automatic

  • @miecz8316
    @miecz8316 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Id love to see a guide on setting up a separate mac address and local ip for every container

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's a video: th-cam.com/video/5grbXvV_DSk/w-d-xo.html

    • @miecz8316
      @miecz8316 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christianlempa Thank you very much, just hope its not outdated at this point, but definitely gonna watch it.

  • @praetorxyn
    @praetorxyn 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    One thing that's probably worth at least considering is that if you use CLI arguments for the static config in the Docker Compose, this lets you pull from environment variables (or a .env file), Docker secrets, etc., and I am not sure using the traefik.yml can do this. But I am not that far yet, I am in the planning phase. Hell, you might say I'm in the pre-planning phase, as I've had Proxmox installed on a MS-01 for 5-6 months and still haven't decided what distribution I want to use for my Docker host :D

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hm, you're right, that's an advantage! Just the formatting and size of the CLI arguments are a bit annoying, so I still prefer the config file.

  • @harsh90731
    @harsh90731 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Please give us the link of the source code, your description link is not working.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      github.com/christianlempa/boilerplates

  • @Oakey76uk
    @Oakey76uk หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yet another fantastic video that turns something complicated into something easy to understand.
    Just one question that you didn't cover and that is how do you add a docker host on another machine?
    I have the docker host that I have installed Traefik on and another that I have docker-proxy on. How would I add that to providers as everything I try prevents Traefik from starting.

    • @Oakey76uk
      @Oakey76uk หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just as an update. I have been unable to find a way directly in traefik but used a docker container called traefik-kop, which solved the issue, and I now have two docker machines using one traefik instance

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! Glad you could solve the issue :)

  • @nivaddoniv8363
    @nivaddoniv8363 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm actually just starting out and was stuck one part, i run the lxc proxmox container and the .env file that doesn't seem to work does it for just yml configuration? So how do you feed the token properly?

  • @darknessblades
    @darknessblades 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do you know if there is any way to use wireguard as a VPN tunnel for something like home-assistant
    with wireguard running in proxmox, and home-assistant on its own PC/RPI
    Where only approved devices can access the HA-server from outside the network trough wireguard.

  • @martinx2922
    @martinx2922 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why do we need a backend in your boilerplate setup if the frontend already handles the requests directly? And why do you include a backend in the setup without explaining its purpose?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I need to update the template, gonna do it the next days ;)

  • @NikConwell
    @NikConwell หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, thanks. Any reason why you didn't use the HTTP challenge instead? I was thinking that would be simpler?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The HTTP challenge requires an external connection from the letsencrypt server to traefik

  • @MelroyvandenBerg
    @MelroyvandenBerg หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No. No cloudflare. The whole world and internet is depending already too much on the centralized cloudflare services. Just no.

  • @mauriziogiorgino3450
    @mauriziogiorgino3450 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi! this work wonderfully but i want to use traefik (on my OMV VM) on another docker container on my proxmox server, what would be the best way to achieve that? a docker swarm?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      There are multiple ways to do this, you could deploy multiple instances of traefik, use external host configs in traefik, or docker swarm would also be a good idea. It depends a bit on your setup and what you want to achieve, why not join our community on discord and raise it as a question.

    • @mauriziogiorgino3450
      @mauriziogiorgino3450 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@christianlempa Thanks for the answer, didn't knew you have a discord server, doing a jump there right now!

  • @BrantScalan
    @BrantScalan หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you have time to update your DNS Bind9 video? Its a bit old. When it runs there are tons of errors around rndc and keys and config to manage the platform as well as maybe include some zone transfer and other basic settings that would be required to make sure DNS is available? Thank you for the great content.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I don't think the content is outdated, maybe there's something wrong with your config, perhaps we should follow up on discord

  • @daro_
    @daro_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you use for slides & presentation ?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm using Excalidraw+ which has a presentation mode

    • @daro_
      @daro_ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christianlempa I didn't know ExcaliDraw has a "+" version :D For a long time I was wondering how to use the frames etc :D Thanks

  • @mostrealtutu
    @mostrealtutu หลายเดือนก่อน

    re the ad: the world really needs more scrapers -,-

  • @borasmax
    @borasmax หลายเดือนก่อน

    hello is there any way to expose my home server to the world. assuming that my Internet provider blocks changing ports in the router, the IP address is not public and dynamic and I cannot connect an external router. and buying a domain costs a bit

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out Cloudflare Tunnels

  • @MelroyvandenBerg
    @MelroyvandenBerg หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You do know that you can define and specify the docker network directly into the docker compose file. Right? 😮

    • @MelroyvandenBerg
      @MelroyvandenBerg หลายเดือนก่อน

      So no need to create it manually via cli..

  • @kevinhu196
    @kevinhu196 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm planning on deploying Traefik on Proxmox, how would you handle traefik labels for between LXC containers, since people say LXC can separate services and also some services like Jellyfin requires a LXC for iGPU

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not using LXC, so unfortunately I can't be sure, but I don't think LXC has labels. It's really just for Docker (which is the reason why I don't use LXC)

    • @kevinhu196
      @kevinhu196 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christianlempa oh thank you helping. I guess only way to take advantage of traefik label make it more convenient is using a single VM for Docker related services and put Traefik there.

  • @TheEmperorXavier
    @TheEmperorXavier หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you soo much for this video, it really helped. Query, do you play that white piano on the back ground. If yes we need to see a video of you doing so please. Putting in a special request

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much! :D Maybe I'm gonna record something in the coming weeks and put it on social media or maybe a second private channel... but I can't promise, long time I didn't play

  • @ryanbuzar5392
    @ryanbuzar5392 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video @Christian Lempa! Thanks for the refreshed content! This was helpful!
    I've been banging my head against the keyboard for the last week or so getting Wazuh to be accessible to my domain behind Traefik. Does anyone have any insight? Thanks!

  • @JGNiDK
    @JGNiDK หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Any reason for Traefik if you’re already having NGINX??

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nginx is just an example, this could be any other application, also non HTTP and TCP/UDP

  • @RiffyDevine
    @RiffyDevine หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about using it across machines, did you ever find a way besides traefik kop?

  • @wstrater
    @wstrater หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have definitely in the party of not using the version of Traefik automatically installed by K3S but now I am wondering why!
    Have you explored using installed version. It is installed using a Helm Custom Resource and dropping a file in `/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/manifests` that contains a couple of HelmChart resources. You should be able to update that file and have it automatically updated with your changes.
    What is the real benefit of removing all of the resources installed automatically by Helm and then reinstalling a custom version? It has to be more than just changing namespace.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like to manage the config using the Helm Values instead of modifications I have to put into the configmap

    • @wstrater
      @wstrater หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ You can drop a file with a HelmChartConfig in the same directory and it overrides the values in the HelmChart.

  • @Dr.Dkbt_JD-PhD-MD-MBA
    @Dr.Dkbt_JD-PhD-MD-MBA 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Would you have time to do the same video but for Nginx Proxy Manager? Thanks and you videos are super helpful, very well done, and highly informative!

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      thank you :) I avoid using nginx proxy manager, because I don't believe it's a good project. I've made one video at some point explaining it: th-cam.com/video/uaixCKTaqY0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=KSSPWqEn_WpX3bQw

    • @Dr.Dkbt_JD-PhD-MD-MBA
      @Dr.Dkbt_JD-PhD-MD-MBA 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @christianlempa oh wow I guess I missed this video. I never realized NPM had that many issues and the dev team was so small. I just checked and they currently have 718 open bugs. Thanks again for another insightful video!

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @ no problem, thanks for watching :)

  • @matemeszaros4127
    @matemeszaros4127 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I like your videos very helpful. Maybe you can show traefik with multi-node setup

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you! Currently, I'm using for each server a separate Traefik instance, but maybe I'm going to rethink that setup next year with using Docker Swarm... we'll see ;)

  • @magran17
    @magran17 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much.

  • @jovyalchoussi4268
    @jovyalchoussi4268 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for video Christian !! Please can you make a video to handle /static/, /media/ files for custom website (like a website on django) with nginx proxy manager, thanks !!

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're welcome! :) I'm not using nginx proxy manager anymore, I think you can use traefik for any static website as well.

    • @jovyalchoussi4268
      @jovyalchoussi4268 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christianlempa Ok thank you

  • @Glitch_860
    @Glitch_860 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So If I am running game servers that use UDP and or TCP ports. I should use routes for traefik to prevent breaking connectivity once traefik is online ?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can use UDP or TCP routers too!

    • @lyth1um
      @lyth1um หลายเดือนก่อน

      would be interesting if this can replace wireguard for this usecase.

  • @trrjecto4459
    @trrjecto4459 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haven't seen it yet, but i always have some issues with traefik 😂. There for i even started to use/learn iptable rules, virtual network interfaces, certbot and ufw. At the end its the same as Treafik

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, that's not true. What you use is a firewall solution working on the TCP/IP layer, but Traefik is a reverse proxy, meaning it hooks into the HTTP requests, can do some modifications to the requests and forward it.

  • @playeronthebeat
    @playeronthebeat หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi!
    I haven't watched the video, yet, but skipped over the timeline/chapters.
    Are you talking about redirecting requests from one traefik to another to a service, too, or would you like to make a tutorial for that?
    For example, I, currently, am running a immich in my homelab. However, I'd like to expose /share/* to the outside. Since you usually do not have a stable IP address, I thought of going through a VPS of mine which. So, any request to /share/* coming from the outside will be directed at my VPS and from there, traefik should route it via my VPN connection to my local traefik which will forward it to immich itself.
    I have never really gotten it to work with traefik. Can you do a tutorial like that? Do you have any other ideas (except for Cloudflare tunnels) regarding that? Any clues on what might have gone wrong? :D

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's not part of this video, maybe I'll include it in another.

    • @playeronthebeat
      @playeronthebeat หลายเดือนก่อน

      @christianlempa that'd be so cool!
      It might be a 'niche' case, but I think a lot of people could benefit from something like this as it secures services and your home network down, and you can use static IPs (if you don't have one)!

  • @mattiavadala7870
    @mattiavadala7870 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really need to manage TLS for local webapp, I can´t understand why the majority of reverse proxy doesn't support that. I just found Caddy useful for that kind of scenario, but I prefer something with a nice UI. :(

    • @newaira333
      @newaira333 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nginx Proxy Manager is probably as good as it gets if you want to manage the proxy via a decent GUI

    • @mattiavadala7870
      @mattiavadala7870 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @newaira333 i know it but he doesn't handle local TLS. I don't expose service on internet so I don't want to have a internet domain just for having cert from let's encrypt. Caddy handle this very well but I don't like the way to use it.

    • @68misty50
      @68misty50 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mattiavadala7870 You can self-host your certificate authority / manager with "Smallstep". And for the domain name, self-host your DNS.
      If this information can help you

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @68misty50 is absolutely right! hopefully I have time next year to finally get smallstep up and running ;)

  • @atrocitus777
    @atrocitus777 หลายเดือนก่อน

    would love a video on openziti as an alternative to something like twingate.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe at some point, currently I'm happy with Twingate.

  • @mjsmith1242
    @mjsmith1242 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow wollte dir gerade schreiben Christian weil du mal ein Video über Kubernetes gemachthattest für TrueNas Scale. Da diese nun bei Docker sind kann ich das Video als passende Anleitung nehmen oder fehlt etwasspezifisches?

    • @mjsmith1242
      @mjsmith1242 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kein edit unter iOS hm. Mir gings dabei nebst reverse proxy auch etwas um den Vergleich mit dem cloudflare DNS Tunnel Proxy Teil. Wollte nur Nextcloud Publisher und überlege nun ob Proxy oder einfach den Tunnel zu nehmen. Oder macht eine Kombination Sinn?

    • @mjsmith1242
      @mjsmith1242 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Damit dürfte es nun soweit klar sein =). Muss nur schauen ob ich ein docker Manager nehme oder truenas intern irgendwas gebastelt hat. Acme läuft ja schon in truenas aber ja so würde es mir schon besser gefallen mit configs.

  • @RocketLR
    @RocketLR หลายเดือนก่อน

    Traefik is great when it works but tbh.. i've had to tinker so much to get it to work with my sonarr and radarr containers..
    Not to mention i still havent gotten my own react applications to work behind traefik.

  • @erikslevin
    @erikslevin หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wie heißt die Font/schriftart für deine Visualisierungen Meister? Sieht jedesmal sehr anschaulich aus!

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Das ist die Standardschrift von Excalidraw, super tool! :)

    • @erikslevin
      @erikslevin หลายเดือนก่อน

      @christianlempa alleine das Tool ist ein kurzes Video wert 😅 direkt als Favorit gespeichert 😁

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ Danke! Hatte ich mal überlegt aber ich werde wahrscheinlich mal ein video generell über Tools machen die ich oft verwende

  • @marianarlt
    @marianarlt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can somebody please explain to me why we need web applications now to do what a few lines of config file of the major webservers have been doing for decades? What timeline is this? This is just more stuff to maintain on top of all the stuff thats going on...WHY? Just expose a port, point reverse proxy to port, be done. Load balancing is also not a new concept. Am I getting old here? Am I being naive? Honestly idk why we need all of this...
    Is this simply a new webserver/balancer/proxy contender with a GUI and tons of buzz words?

    • @stephenzedalis4012
      @stephenzedalis4012 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most webservers won't have the smarts to go out and get the SSL certificate using DNS challenge, nor intelligently parse the backend docker or kubernetes. This is a smart layer 7 protocol router/reverse proxy that is separate from whatever web server or application you want to use. You could use this to frontend the web gui of IoT applications where you may not have control of the web server. Nginx web proxy can do similar, or Caddy, or HAProxy. Think of this as a single proxy for a farm of servers or applications. Doing it in webserver typically does it for that single server and you would have to configure it for every server you had in play. This can be in front of apache and nginx at the same time if both happen to be in separate containers or separate servers/nodes.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can't say anything about getting old 😆, but just a few ideas why this is useful. Imagine you don't have to worry about managing config lines on your web server / proxy, or use additional services to manage TLS certificates. You can all do it with just 4 lines in your docker-compose files, which you use for application deployment. Also, when it comes to Kubernetes, it has so many advantages.

  • @crow3291
    @crow3291 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What's the advantage of Traefik over NPM for reverse proxying?

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I've made a video on NPM, in my opinion, it's not a reliable project.

    • @crow3291
      @crow3291 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@christianlempa Thanks! I love how you just manage the containers using compose, command line and VS Code connected through SSH. Do you still use Portainer or something like that?

  • @taaest-xek
    @taaest-xek หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wouldn't use traefik for high (really) load

  • @forsaken1776
    @forsaken1776 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    easy he says LOL

  • @pandaoflove7410
    @pandaoflove7410 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi, would you teach me privately? Will pay per hour. Deutscher Azubi, Mir wurde ein Server anvertraut und ich muss Traefik, Authelia und Docker vernetzen. Suche dringend einen Tutor und das wäre das Geld wert.

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hallo, erst mal schön, dass du die Ausbildung machst, klingt nach einem super interessanten Projekt! :) Allerdings habe ich leider keine Zeit für individuelles Coaching, etc. Ich würde dir aber gerne unsere Discord Community empfehlen, bin auch selbst oft da in den Channels aktiv. Und meine Videos über diese Themen helfen natürlich auch! LG

    • @pandaoflove7410
      @pandaoflove7410 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@christianlempa danke für deine Antwort. Wie erreiche ich deinen Discord?

  • @OilPuztelHeaded5678
    @OilPuztelHeaded5678 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know what I'm doing wrong. I keep running into the same problem after I unpack docker compose up.
    docker compose up
    Attaching to traefik-demo-1
    and then nothing happens. I have taken over the docker-compose.yaml and traefik.yaml 1 to 1 as in the video :(

    • @christianlempa
      @christianlempa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe let's follow up on Discord

    • @johnderix1947
      @johnderix1947 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have exactly the same