Commutators and Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors of Operators

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2017
  • In this video, I introduce the concept of commutators and eigenvalues/eigenvectors in Quantum Mechanics. After stating some properties (my apologies for inundating you with a bunch of statements), I then move on to discussing the 2nd Postulate of Quantum Mechanics.
    This should all be a nice build-up to the video where I finally prove the Generalized Uncertainty Principle!
    Questions? Ask in the comments!
    Prereqs: The videos in my Quantum Mechanics playlist before this one - • Quantum Mechanics: Mat...
    Lecture Notes: drive.google.com/open?id=1CKK...
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=4354534
    Twitter: FacultyOfKhan?lan...
    Special Thanks to my Patrons!
    - Jennifer Helfman
    - Justin Hill
    - Jacob Soares
    - Yenyo Pal

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @austinnguyen9107
    @austinnguyen9107 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    wow this always seemed so complicated to me. Ur explanations were very concise n to the point :)

  • @pip119
    @pip119 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent summary. Looking forward to the uncertainty principle (hopefully more discussion on compatible observables?).
    Would also like to see ones on the correspondence principle & The Ehrenfest theorem (perhaps after you've covered time dependence?).

  • @oguzhankoksal9444
    @oguzhankoksal9444 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please dont stop. I am learnig new complex thing. Thank you. By the way you deserve more follower but this topics are very high to many people

  • @Garen1
    @Garen1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Amazing job on presentation and explanation. Everything is well organized, clear, and broken down with the quality off the roof. Thank you for making this series!

  • @monissiddiqui6559
    @monissiddiqui6559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this amazing video. I a studying QM and coming from a math background I get pretty amazed at how many different math concepts are involved. It is nice to go over this video series that goes over all the math concepts involved in a fairly short amount of time.
    On a side note, I wonder where the jacobi identity for commutators is used in QM.

  • @jackdeago3639
    @jackdeago3639 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best so far, it's unique of its kind. Keep going

  • @eagleclaw8497
    @eagleclaw8497 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u for your effort bro, wish u a good luck

  • @youssefbenmoussa6050
    @youssefbenmoussa6050 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can't thank you enough you're amazing

  • @abhijeetmishra5408
    @abhijeetmishra5408 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    beautiful explanation! Thumbs up.

  • @estanislaomarquez8374
    @estanislaomarquez8374 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, As usual, your lectures are nice. Buy I think that the 4 property of opperators shows that B produces a subspace of the space of A operator. What do u think?

  • @kankaiahk7197
    @kankaiahk7197 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent sir please upload more videos about commutator problems

  • @pabloweigandt4884
    @pabloweigandt4884 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The specific form of the operators (position and momentum in this case) depends on the basis you choose. The example in the video is in the position basis. 😃

  • @StefSubZero270
    @StefSubZero270 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn' t the momentum operator (at least in position representation) be - i hbar times partial derivate? Why do you write it as hbar/i ?

  • @jacobflores8666
    @jacobflores8666 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because of the anti-symmetry and Jacobi identity, that means that the commutator is a Lie Bracket correct?

  • @quantumsoul3495
    @quantumsoul3495 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Lie bracket the same as commutator ?

  • @valor36az
    @valor36az ปีที่แล้ว

    Are measurable quantities real life estimates like blood pressure, height….etc

  • @pabloweigandt4884
    @pabloweigandt4884 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can you say that an operator commute with a scalar? Do you mean the scalar multiplied by the identity operator?

  • @ostensiblyquerulous
    @ostensiblyquerulous 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know you stipulate a certain donation level on patreon to recommend videos, but I would love a formal break down of the Poisson bracket in use with the classical Hamiltonian to define the equations of motion. Like if you could work through an example from parametrizing coordinates and defining the Hamiltonian to finding the equations of motion, that would be much appreciated.

    • @FacultyofKhan
      @FacultyofKhan  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That donation level is only if you want videos in the next 2 weeks. I'll still take requests regardless (though I might get to them later)! In your case, I'll put it on my to-do list :)

    • @ostensiblyquerulous
      @ostensiblyquerulous 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you chap!

  • @ntvonline9480
    @ntvonline9480 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m doing eigenvalues and eigenfunctions (PDE). Darn!

    • @FacultyofKhan
      @FacultyofKhan  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interesting. I kind of touched on eigenvalues/eigenfunctions in my Sturm-Liouville video and my Eigenfunction Expansion (PDE) video. But is that something you would like to see me do?

    • @ntvonline9480
      @ntvonline9480 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Faculty of Khan Thanks! I will check out your S-L video.

  • @anjankumarpati784
    @anjankumarpati784 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is Eigenstate

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a state of a quantummechanical system for a particular operator. For example, when the energy-operator works on (a wavefunction describing) an electron in a hydrogen-atom it produces specific energystates (remember the shells electrons can be in?). These specific states are eigenstates for that the energy-operator. The position- and momentum-operator have their own eigenstates (depending on the system).

  • @asirintesartushar4256
    @asirintesartushar4256 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are an UnderGrad Student ?

  • @qamerkhattak4908
    @qamerkhattak4908 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    please eplain the property of completness

    • @FacultyofKhan
      @FacultyofKhan  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've explained it in my Hilbert space video (4:15 for the relevant timestamp):
      th-cam.com/video/7zx3MT9FgT0/w-d-xo.html

  • @Eloss69
    @Eloss69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sacripant de pub de Lancôme au milieu d’un explication, otherwise very cool video 😎

  • @ellenetdesign
    @ellenetdesign 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Actually, the eigenvalue lambda is a real number, not a complex number. Yes? Oh that is only true if the operator is Hermitian.

    • @FacultyofKhan
      @FacultyofKhan  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For specific operators (e.g. Hermitian operators, which is one of the more famous QM operator types), the eigenvalue is real, but in general, it's complex. Hope that helps!
      Also, are you actually Estelle Asmodelle? I'm just curious because I didn't expect a well-known scientific writer to be hanging around on my channel, let alone TH-cam.

    • @ellenetdesign
      @ellenetdesign 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, I am her. Brushing up on my QM maths for my PhD. This is review for me and your lectures are actually quite succinct !

    • @FacultyofKhan
      @FacultyofKhan  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad I can help! Good luck on your thesis!

    • @ellenetdesign
      @ellenetdesign 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, and keep the good work going.

  • @kamusiimeazaria5161
    @kamusiimeazaria5161 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    😪😪 looks like rocket science

  • @pondoknira117
    @pondoknira117 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess it's exaggerating..
    Oh really

  • @englishforfunandcompetitio248
    @englishforfunandcompetitio248 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    He isn't teaching at all. He is just reading out from some book or notes. Disappointed by such approach. Definitely pressed dislike button.

  • @user-sm1tn2cj6q
    @user-sm1tn2cj6q 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Given an operator 𝐴
    ̂ = (𝑥
    ̂
    𝑑
    𝑑𝑥
    + 2). Calculate
    (a) [𝐴
    ̂, 𝑥
    (b)
    ̂]
    [𝐴
    ̂,
    𝑑
    𝑑𝑥
    ]
    . Some help