Another thing about that verse in Mark is that it mentions one man and one woman and takes about the two becoming 1. Two. Not three four five or a thousand. Yet David was permitted 700 wives and 300 concubines. And NOWHERE in the gospels is their plural marriage ever condemned despite marks words.
Judaism did not forbid polygamy. That was a Greco-Roman belief adopted by Christians and eventually by Jews living in the Greco-Roman world. However, Jews living in areas not in areas where the Roman Empire held sway, Jews continued to have more than one wife. This was an issue in the 1950s when Yemeni Jews started immigrating to Israel and often included families where there were multiple wives.
Because man and the enemy has stepped in with private interpretation and philosophical understanding to define An unfathomable and infinite GOD YHWH; who’s ways are higher than our ways and who’s thoughts are higher than our thoughts. Which it’s why, our relationship with Jesus is what will be judged by GOD not man.
Case closed. This rule is guided by homophobia. It's not even wrong to get a divorce anymore? When it's *clearly,* yes, CLEARLY stated to be wrong in the Bible? Sin is not sin when you're a heterosexual apparently.
Actually, we have no idea what Jesus taught his Jewish followers. All we have is what some anonymous authors of the late 1st/early 2nd century told their Greek speaking audiences he taught. That's it.
Someone please show me where JESUS condemned gay folk. Or was it all from the mouth of men, claiming Jesus said it. King James rewrote the bible, or had his contemporaries write it to say what he wanted it to say. That's history. In King James history. Man not God wrote the bible. Try even threw out books of the bible they didn't agree with.look all of it up.
0:30 I think a better comparison is to say there's a picture that says "it's great to be a dog owner," while below these words shows a dead cat. That's a more appropriate comparison to the term: "Black Lives Matter," to let's say a poor white person or the feminist movement to let's say a dad who can't see his kids.
I've understood your reasoning... but I want to specify that if a lot of people believe that feminism is against men is because most of feminists actually hate men. Moreover, feminism, as MRAs, uses a divisive language, thinks by categories: if they think that women are oppressed ignore that PEOPLE are generally oppressed by SOMEONE, instead feminism, as the anti-racist movement, thinks that specific categories of people are oppressed. Marx explane this concept well in his book about the Jews issues.
Unfortunately I don't agree with you. The bible is emphatic about same sex Union in Leveticus 18:22; 20:13. By extension gay marriage would lead to sexual consumation between the two and that would be wrong according to the bible - nothing could be clearer. Let's not insinuate what the Bible has not said but is very clear about. Man is free to make their choices but let's not partner with God in this. I am afraid you are wrong.
Of course, by your logic, Jesus didn't condemn polygamy either. After all, supporting marriage between 1 man and 1 woman does not expressly condemn marriages between more than 1 man and/or more than 1 woman.
In honor of Rosh hashanah 💕 Man and Woman (ish and isha) are already One. We always have been. GOD created / fashioned man and then woman from man’s rib; Oneness. 👁 “So YHWH GOD created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Gen 1:27” “And YHWH GOD caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam (ish), and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the YHWH GOD had taken from the man, made He a woman (isha), and brought her unto the man. Gen 2:21-22” ✨ Marriage / Union affirms the soul covenant, tie, contract before Jesus. Jonathan and David proclaimed three covenants in GOD; be equipped. ✨ Leaving the fathers and mothers house symbolizes the transition from the covering of dependence to independence (adulthood). Shalom in Jesus 🪔 YHWH Breathes
The divorce thing works against you: if Jesus approved gay marriage, wouldn't gay divorce need to follow the same rules? That is, the more this passage looks like part of an exhaustive study of marriage, the less likely it is that he simply forgot to mention gay marriage. Normally, you'd want to prove that his reference to marriage here was fleeting - not that he was discussing marriage at length because it makes his failure to mention gay marriage appear deliberate (rather than inadvertent). In other words, I might not think of gay marriage & thus I might not mention it but that's less likely if I'm talking about marriage at length.
Its christ (aka god) if he didnt mention it, its because it was not a question that the sanhedrin asked. If christ was worried about it he whould had mentioned it. I doubt god "simply forgot"
@Beastbombshell what bible verse do you have then that both mentions same sex marriages as well as condemns them because if u have no bible verse to back this view up then you are making up stuff, and whats worse you do it in Gods name.
The word 'marriage' is not in this text...what does this mean? That a sexual contact between a man and woman counts as a marriage already, or better, only when both are in Christ (can this be in doing what Christ teaches or also explicitly believing in Christ?)..? God bless, in the name and blood of Jesus Christ, with evil put under the feet of Jesus Christ, amen.
According to the bible it only talks about heterosexual marriage it does not exclude gay marriage .. in Matthew 19 it says because there are people who are unable to get str8 married because they are made into eunuchs by others or they are born that way, meaning gay .. A third group choose to forgo str8 marriage for the kingdom of God ..
I enjoyed the Harry Potter books and universe a bit more than the Judeo-Christian universe. But I live in the real universe, which encompasses both, and to which both are subordinate. I think sometimes people get a bit carried away with these fact-based-fictional ideas. I’m more of a fact-based-nonfiction reader.
Unfortunately, the bible does clearly condemn homosexuality as sin. If this is taken into account, there is obviously no support of gay marriage. Sorry. Just because a sinner wants to sin, should he/she? To take this to a very clear extreme to make the point, just because a serial killer wants to kill someone should he/she? Just because someone wants to have sex with another of the same gender should he/she?
Hi there! It seems like you hold the belief that the Bible condemns homosexuality as a sin and that it consequently doesn't support gay marriage. While it's true that certain interpretations of religious texts may view homosexuality as sinful, it's important to remember that perspectives on this issue have varied among scholars and religious denominations. Regarding your analogy, it's important to differentiate consensual same-sex relationships from criminal acts. Engaging in a loving relationship with someone of the same gender is a matter of personal choice and doesn't cause harm to others, whereas acts like murder are universally recognized as infringing upon the rights and well-being of others.
Pointing out a logical fallacy is good I guess. Pointing out a hypyocracy by the Catholic church at the end doesnt do much to support the topic, which I thought was about what Jesus taught about marriage, but I think more time was spent on the BLM thing. Also, assuming the argument that supporting one thing does not mean you reject the other thing is a great argument white nationalists use. How do you feel about it used in that context?
The New Testament says: 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 New King James Version (NKJV) 9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor [a]homosexuals, nor [b]sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
so NKJV says that God will reject people who are merely attracted to the same secs? and he will reject a husband and wife for having oral secs? I don't think the original Greek New Testament said anything like that. Sounds like a mistranslation to me.
One of my biggest pet peeves: When LGBT activists pull the argument from ignorance fallacy. Essentially, we can excuse anything we want because supposedly "Jesus didn't directly oppose it." Also, "same-sex marriage" is an offshoot of marriage.
@@josephthompson5440 he is not right I really encourage you to pray about it and really look at the scripture for example Romans 1:22:28 1 corinthians 6:9:11 also it does Address it when Jesus was asked about marriage he said have you not read that he who made them in the being made them male and female basically he said that only between a man and a woman does he approve marriage so what this guy is saying it is sadly not biblical not only that but Jesus would have gone against his world and nature he would be contradicting himself for it is written I the lord I change not it does say it is a sin however it can be forgiven like any other sin and the person being made into a new creation 2 Corinthians 5:17:18
@@Empty_Robot he is not right I really encourage you to pray about it and really look at the scripture for example Romans 1:22:28 1 corinthians 6:9:11 also it does Address it when Jesus was asked about marriage he said have you not read that he who made them in the being made them male and female basically he said that only between a man and a woman does he approve marriage so what this guy is saying it is sadly not biblical not only that but Jesus would have gone against his world and nature he would be contradicting himself for it is written I the lord I change not it does say it is a sin however it can be forgiven like any other sin and the person being made into a new creation 2 Corinthians 5:17:18
I WAS A HOMOSEXUAL TRYING TO JUSTIFY JESUS TO ACCEPT ME THE WAY I AM BUT THE TRUTH IS GOD WANTS US TO CHANGE. I can happily say that through commit to to him he has CHANGED ME and I now aspire to have a family instead of marry another woman and live a lesbian lifestyle. Even when you have a child you expect them to change mentally physically etc so God definitely wants the same thing for us. If everyone were Gay no one could have children and life is a gift from God so imagine us being the last of our bloodline because we selfishly wanted to put our wants and need over Gods wants and needs. Jesus Christ is more fulfilling than anyone on earth that I ever dated loved or was involved with and he can be that for anyone who accepts him in their heart. 💜💜🥹🎉🙏🏽‼️ GOD BLESS
Do you even realize how many gay couples have married and most of them have children. Someone went forth and multiplied. Yet you say its scriptural to have babies. Are adoptions of the devil?? All these heterosexual people didn't have children so they adopted. Are they going to be sent away from God in the end???
@@devanplays3509 when you have a scar that is no longer noticeable doesn't mean it was suppressed. It means it was healed. Jesus fixed my problems and he can do the same for you. God bless you 💜✊🏽
Getting theology from Forest Gump…Gods word says For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
sorry, rom 1 has nothing to do with forest gump. you've probably commented on the wrong video by mistake. and fyi this video is about marriage, not "shameless acts" that rom 1 is talking about.
Another thing about that verse in Mark is that it mentions one man and one woman and takes about the two becoming 1. Two. Not three four five or a thousand. Yet David was permitted 700 wives and 300 concubines. And NOWHERE in the gospels is their plural marriage ever condemned despite marks words.
Judaism did not forbid polygamy. That was a Greco-Roman belief adopted by Christians and eventually by Jews living in the Greco-Roman world. However, Jews living in areas not in areas where the Roman Empire held sway, Jews continued to have more than one wife. This was an issue in the 1950s when Yemeni Jews started immigrating to Israel and often included families where there were multiple wives.
WHY IS THERE SO MUCH HATE IN RELIGION?
Because ignorance breeds hate. That's why religious studies is so important.
@@ThatTheologyTeacher true but it does breed hate so well.
Maybe for the same reason non religion brings hate? Its a people problem?
Because man and the enemy has stepped in with private interpretation and philosophical understanding to define An unfathomable and infinite GOD YHWH; who’s ways are higher than our ways and who’s thoughts are higher than our thoughts. Which it’s why, our relationship with Jesus is what will be judged by GOD not man.
There is hate where ever there is people.
Case closed. This rule is guided by homophobia. It's not even wrong to get a divorce anymore? When it's *clearly,* yes, CLEARLY stated to be wrong in the Bible? Sin is not sin when you're a heterosexual apparently.
Its only wrong in Catholicism.
Do you provide Bible studies? I want to learn from you! Bless you for teaching the truth in the manner in which you do. Love you!
Actually, we have no idea what Jesus taught his Jewish followers. All we have is what some anonymous authors of the late 1st/early 2nd century told their Greek speaking audiences he taught. That's it.
That Bud Light hat aged like fine... bud light.
Someone please show me where JESUS condemned gay folk. Or was it all from the mouth of men, claiming Jesus said it. King James rewrote the bible, or had his contemporaries write it to say what he wanted it to say. That's history. In King James history. Man not God wrote the bible. Try even threw out books of the bible they didn't agree with.look all of it up.
Jesus never outright talked about homosexuality at all, especially not how we conceive it
0:30 I think a better comparison is to say there's a picture that says "it's great to be a dog owner," while below these words shows a dead cat.
That's a more appropriate comparison to the term: "Black Lives Matter," to let's say a poor white person or the feminist movement to let's say a dad who can't see his kids.
I've understood your reasoning... but I want to specify that if a lot of people believe that feminism is against men is because most of feminists actually hate men. Moreover, feminism, as MRAs, uses a divisive language, thinks by categories: if they think that women are oppressed ignore that PEOPLE are generally oppressed by SOMEONE, instead feminism, as the anti-racist movement, thinks that specific categories of people are oppressed.
Marx explane this concept well in his book about the Jews issues.
I love this man
Unfortunately I don't agree with you. The bible is emphatic about same sex Union in Leveticus 18:22; 20:13. By extension gay marriage would lead to sexual consumation between the two and that would be wrong according to the bible - nothing could be clearer.
Let's not insinuate what the Bible has not said but is very clear about. Man is free to make their choices but let's not partner with God in this. I am afraid you are wrong.
Of course, by your logic, Jesus didn't condemn polygamy either. After all, supporting marriage between 1 man and 1 woman does not expressly condemn marriages between more than 1 man and/or more than 1 woman.
That is, I'm not sure why the 1 thing is definitive, but the man & woman thing is meaningless.
@@christopherpaige3270 but God called poligomy marriage.
But he didn't though. Many Biblical figures were polygamous or chased more than one woman.
What about Sodom and Gomorrah?
City of rapists.
What about it? 🙃
he has a video about this
King Henry Blue Beard (the XIII ?) began anti pope crusade and established anglican church to be able to divorce and remarry
In honor of Rosh hashanah
💕
Man and Woman (ish and isha) are already One. We always have been. GOD created / fashioned man and then woman from man’s rib; Oneness.
👁
“So YHWH GOD created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Gen 1:27”
“And YHWH GOD caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam (ish), and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the YHWH GOD had taken from the man, made He a woman (isha), and brought her unto the man. Gen 2:21-22”
✨
Marriage / Union affirms the soul covenant, tie, contract before Jesus. Jonathan and David proclaimed three covenants in GOD; be equipped.
✨
Leaving the fathers and mothers house symbolizes the transition from the covering of dependence to independence (adulthood).
Shalom in Jesus 🪔 YHWH Breathes
The divorce thing works against you: if Jesus approved gay marriage, wouldn't gay divorce need to follow the same rules?
That is, the more this passage looks like part of an exhaustive study of marriage, the less likely it is that he simply forgot to mention gay marriage. Normally, you'd want to prove that his reference to marriage here was fleeting - not that he was discussing marriage at length because it makes his failure to mention gay marriage appear deliberate (rather than inadvertent).
In other words, I might not think of gay marriage & thus I might not mention it but that's less likely if I'm talking about marriage at length.
same sex divorse is wrong as hetero ones are.
Its christ (aka god) if he didnt mention it, its because it was not a question that the sanhedrin asked. If christ was worried about it he whould had mentioned it. I doubt god "simply forgot"
@Beastbombshell what bible verse do you have then that both mentions same sex marriages as well as condemns them because if u have no bible verse to back this view up then you are making up stuff, and whats worse you do it in Gods name.
@@tysonvslewis12 clearly it just was not an issue
Makes sense to me
POURQUOI TU ECRIT TOUT EN FRANçAIS ALORS QUE LA VIDEO ET ENTIEREMENT EN ANGLAIS c'est une VRAI question... =-=
The word 'marriage' is not in this text...what does this mean? That a sexual contact between a man and woman counts as a marriage already, or better, only when both are in Christ (can this be in doing what Christ teaches or also explicitly believing in Christ?)..? God bless, in the name and blood of Jesus Christ, with evil put under the feet of Jesus Christ, amen.
According to the bible it only talks about heterosexual marriage it does not exclude gay marriage .. in Matthew 19 it says because there are people who are unable to get str8 married because they are made into eunuchs by others or they are born that way, meaning gay .. A third group choose to forgo str8 marriage for the kingdom of God ..
I enjoyed the Harry Potter books and universe a bit more than the Judeo-Christian universe. But I live in the real universe, which encompasses both, and to which both are subordinate.
I think sometimes people get a bit carried away with these fact-based-fictional ideas.
I’m more of a fact-based-nonfiction reader.
Unfortunately, the bible does clearly condemn homosexuality as sin. If this is taken into account, there is obviously no support of gay marriage. Sorry. Just because a sinner wants to sin, should he/she? To take this to a very clear extreme to make the point, just because a serial killer wants to kill someone should he/she? Just because someone wants to have sex with another of the same gender should he/she?
Hi there! It seems like you hold the belief that the Bible condemns homosexuality as a sin and that it consequently doesn't support gay marriage. While it's true that certain interpretations of religious texts may view homosexuality as sinful, it's important to remember that perspectives on this issue have varied among scholars and religious denominations.
Regarding your analogy, it's important to differentiate consensual same-sex relationships from criminal acts. Engaging in a loving relationship with someone of the same gender is a matter of personal choice and doesn't cause harm to others, whereas acts like murder are universally recognized as infringing upon the rights and well-being of others.
Pointing out a logical fallacy is good I guess. Pointing out a hypyocracy by the Catholic church at the end doesnt do much to support the topic, which I thought was about what Jesus taught about marriage, but I think more time was spent on the BLM thing. Also, assuming the argument that supporting one thing does not mean you reject the other thing is a great argument white nationalists use. How do you feel about it used in that context?
Genesis chapter 2.
Polygamy is not a sin in christianity.
@Beastbombshell There is a reference in the bible where God gives Himself credit for giving a man many wives.
This is my veggitales 😤😤😤😤😤😤
Spoiler alert
When Google becomes our bible it's much easier to sin and not feel bad about it. Great advice mate 😉
The New Testament says:
1 Corinthians 6:9-11 New King James Version (NKJV)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor [a]homosexuals, nor [b]sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
so NKJV says that God will reject people who are merely attracted to the same secs? and he will reject a husband and wife for having oral secs? I don't think the original Greek New Testament said anything like that. Sounds like a mistranslation to me.
Homossexual is new word don’t exist before
One of my biggest pet peeves: When LGBT activists pull the argument from ignorance fallacy. Essentially, we can excuse anything we want because supposedly "Jesus didn't directly oppose it." Also, "same-sex marriage" is an offshoot of marriage.
same sex marriage is just marriage
whats fallacy?
@@eliasziad7864 you will have to ask the homophobics
@@pastorbri I am homophobic, dumbass.
Interesting
It says in the Bible homosexuals will not inhearit the kingdom of heaven unless there a new creation
Yeah no It never said that. That was a mistranslation
@@devanplays3509 well I hope your right
@@devanplays3509 what does it say then?
@@josephthompson5440 he is not right I really encourage you to pray about it and really look at the scripture for example Romans 1:22:28 1 corinthians 6:9:11 also it does Address it when Jesus was asked about marriage he said have you not read that he who made them in the being made them male and female basically he said that only between a man and a woman does he approve marriage so what this guy is saying it is sadly not biblical not only that but Jesus would have gone against his world and nature he would be contradicting himself for it is written I the lord I change not it does say it is a sin however it can be forgiven like any other sin and the person being made into a new creation 2 Corinthians 5:17:18
@@Empty_Robot he is not right I really encourage you to pray about it and really look at the scripture for example Romans 1:22:28 1 corinthians 6:9:11 also it does Address it when Jesus was asked about marriage he said have you not read that he who made them in the being made them male and female basically he said that only between a man and a woman does he approve marriage so what this guy is saying it is sadly not biblical not only that but Jesus would have gone against his world and nature he would be contradicting himself for it is written I the lord I change not it does say it is a sin however it can be forgiven like any other sin and the person being made into a new creation 2 Corinthians 5:17:18
I WAS A HOMOSEXUAL TRYING TO JUSTIFY JESUS TO ACCEPT ME THE WAY I AM BUT THE TRUTH IS GOD WANTS US TO CHANGE. I can happily say that through commit to to him he has CHANGED ME and I now aspire to have a family instead of marry another woman and live a lesbian lifestyle. Even when you have a child you expect them to change mentally physically etc so God definitely wants the same thing for us. If everyone were Gay no one could have children and life is a gift from God so imagine us being the last of our bloodline because we selfishly wanted to put our wants and need over Gods wants and needs. Jesus Christ is more fulfilling than anyone on earth that I ever dated loved or was involved with and he can be that for anyone who accepts him in their heart. 💜💜🥹🎉🙏🏽‼️ GOD BLESS
Do you even realize how many gay couples have married and most of them have children. Someone went forth and multiplied. Yet you say its scriptural to have babies. Are adoptions of the devil?? All these heterosexual people didn't have children so they adopted. Are they going to be sent away from God in the end???
Good job at suppressing your feelings
@@devanplays3509 when you have a scar that is no longer noticeable doesn't mean it was suppressed. It means it was healed. Jesus fixed my problems and he can do the same for you. God bless you 💜✊🏽
Reading this just genuinely makes me sad for you unless you are a troll and then in that case go fuck yourself
@@Khiythemusician That's sad that you think this way
Rubbish... You really have a skill with twisting language and context. You should be ashamed. I'm not even a Christian and I see your deception
false
Jesus 3 Eunuchs
False teacher.
Yes you are. Glad you outed yourself.
Getting theology from Forest Gump…Gods word says
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature;
27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
sorry, rom 1 has nothing to do with forest gump. you've probably commented on the wrong video by mistake.
and fyi this video is about marriage, not "shameless acts" that rom 1 is talking about.
Romans2
Where does Romans 1 say it's about marriages?
This is what happens when we let new Christian denominations have access to the internet smh