Quaid's First Address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan | Speech Every Pakistani Must Listen
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- QUAID DAY SPECIAL
Listen to the Narration of an excerpt from Muhammad Ali Jinnah's First Presidential Address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan (11 August 1947). This Piece Encapsulates the Idea of 'Pakistan' that Quaid-E-Azam had envisioned and the Steps that he believed will bring Glory and Ultimate Success to Pakistan.
Undoubtedly, This is a Speech that Every Citizen of Pakistan Should Listen to and Understand.
پاکستان کی دستور ساز اسمبلی سے محمد علی جناح کے پہلے صدارتی خطاب (11 اگست 1947) کا ایک اقتباس سنیں۔ یہ ٹکڑا 'پاکستان' کے اس نظریے کو سمیٹتا ہے جس کا تصور قائداعظم نے کیا تھا اور وہ اقدامات جن پر ان کا یقین تھا کہ وہ پاکستان کی شان و شوکت اور حتمی کامیابیاں لائے گا۔
بلاشبہ یہ ایک ایسی تقریر ہے جسے پاکستان کے ہر شہری کو سننا اور سمجھنا چاہیے۔
------------------------------------------------------
Source:
Official Archive Article of the National Assembly of Pakistan:
na.gov.pk/en/c...
Excerpt from [6] to [8]:
www.columbia.ed...
------------------------------------------------------
Follow Dr. Taimur Rahman on Social Media:
Instagram:
/ taimur_laal
Twitter:
/ taimur_laal
#quaidday #Jinnah #25december #indiapakistan #britishindia #history #pakistan #quaidspeech #jinnahspeech #Speech #urduspeech
As a Pakistani I feel that experiment of divison is proved terribly wrong.
It has devastating effects on World and Subcontinent .
May Allah give us wisdom to live like good neighbours like USA and Canada.
heading towards reunion like European Union .
Also like both Koreas where there are Réunion Ministries, there should be at least so reconciliation ministry to mitigate misconceptions on both sides, which should have regular meetings irrespective of border situations.
It wasn't an experiment in my opinion. It had to happen.
Getting impressed from west is similar to looking for copper when you already have gold (islam).
Agree and respect for Tayyab Tahir and Umer Kazmi Sahib
Canada and eu don't discriminate on basis of religion , u were made on the basis of religious discrimination and more importantly they are secular states
@@SACRED_HITMAN Agree
But more then 70 years has been passed after division .
It is more then enough time to learn and become mature enough to take bold steps .
United Subcontinent is my dream.
In 1995 I moved to Europe for better future then I started to think about it.
As a Pakistani Muslim I love all religions and espacialy hindus , my ancestors.
🤞🤞🤞🌹🌹🌹🌹
Quaide Azam zindabad
Goosebumps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quaid is the personification of perspicaciousness.
He wasn't Quaid the real maker of Pakistan were the British , jinnah was just a agent of them just as imran khan was agent of other
Perspicaciousness?
یوں دی آزادی ہمیں کہ یہ دنیا ہوئی حیران ، اے قائد اعظم تیرا احسان ہے احسان ۔
❤️🇵🇰
The world wasn't surprised infact jinnah was agent of the British and u didn't gain independence u were created on that day
@@SACRED_HITMAN We were born with Adam A.S.
@@pakkhakii5595 mention word Pakistan in quaran or hadees
@@SACRED_HITMAN Quran and Hadees came long time after Prophet Adam A.S..
Everyone is born as a Muslim but the environment around them changes their beliefs and thoughts..
And Pakistan was built for special Purposes which will be disclosed when we will witness the last War between India and Pakistan.
@@pakkhakii5595 "every one is born Muslim " it is just a claim , yes it is written in Qur'an and hadees doesn't make it necessarily true
Similar claims are made by other religions it is also written in their sacred books
When will be the last war i assume you mean Qayamat, when is Qayamat going to come and should there be war
Thank you for opening our eyes sir
Priceless daring effort Dr Sb.
Wah.
Kmal
Thanks for sharing this sir ♥️
This video is a Eye Opener
hats off to our beloved Jinnah....❤❤
Bangladesh comes knocking. Bengali is better than urdu
@@Myanmartiger921 mere khyal Mai hr language hi bohat achi h... Yes my national language is Urdu but I really like Bengali too .. even though I really like Hindi transcripts too .
@@alihaider-nz8hs beautiful answer.
@@umair_qazmi thankiuuu🥰
@@alihaider-nz8hs do u know anything about direct action day???
Very informative video to share the ideas and thoughts of our country founder.
Jinnah was a hinduphobe and yet said he will live in India after partition same as imran khan u turn Jinnah
@@SACRED_HITMAN bhosreekay tumhe yahi tension lgi rhe ge k hum tumhe ganda samjhte hen. bhai apna kam kro or humay ap kaam krne de. tum indian ki har kisi gand me ghusay baghair roti hazam nhi hoti
@@WaqarMuneer i didn't meant Pakistani hate Hindus but jinnah hated hindu ( two nation theory) the video and my comment are both about jinnah and not comman Pakistani
@@SACRED_HITMAN you need to study abc of polotics first.
Two nation theory is not about hating hindus
@@danimalik7078 it is discriminatory towards Hindus is that right? Because jinnah specifically mentioned Hindus not chistians , Buddhist , Jews Sikhs but Hindus
Great Sir
Splendid 💓❤️❤️
Best speech sir
Sir excellent
Loved it production 👌
Dr. Taimur Rehman Sahib, Asalamo o Alakum , thanks for present the speach of Quaid e Azam after his achievement of Separation of some part of of India on religious basis and used the emotions of hate of muslims against Hindu faith peoples on religious basis. Quaid e Azam was the first leader of India whoes used religion as a tool to his politics. Quaid e Azam was deny the conception of national state on religious basis and efforts to create a state country on secular basis purely on national conception. The leader whose whole political struggle was based on anti secular national state and gives a massage to peoples of new country Pakistan which was created to divide the India on religious base to become secular because he had achieved his goal and become the Governor General of Pakistan of newly created state which is created by religious basis. The great leader asked the peoples you are free to practice their own faith without any fear the peoples alse free for their religious practice in united India and there were no restriction on any one to do their religious practice it was India not a any communist country. The all India muslim League gave a conception of peoples of Indian muslims a separate nation on basis of religion and gave a conception of supremacy on basis of their religion and undermine the peoples of other religion which are in majority in population Hindus faith and used the emotions of Indian muslims against only hindu faith peoples but he was not against any other religious faith peoples like Christian's and Parsi and he was not say any single word against the peoples of these religious faith peoples he loved Parsi religious faith peoples and his daughter was also loved with Parsi faith person and Dina Jinnah married with Parsi faith person and lived in India and never came to Pakistan. The great leader how expected that a peoples suddenly changed their mind and become secular to listen the speach of that leader whoes all speaches were against Hindu faith peoples and whoes himself and his party used the emotions if hate and they were created deliberately hate against the peoples on religious basis . The great leader suddenly changed his mind and become a secular from religious extremist and he gives massage to those peoples which he gave a anti nationalism to become in favour of national state on the principals of secular. This speach is the proof that All India Muslim Leaghue and his leader ship used religion for their political achievement only. Thanks.
You truly should be ashamed of yourself.
The Dream that we had. But it never happened. 😞 We just went from one colonial class (Britishers) to another (You know who).
To kia
Hum waqai kabi AZAAD huye.
Shayad nahi.
Heheheheheheh lage raho munna bhai
Your dreams shouldn't come true if it is two nation theory
hope, Pakistan follow these words of Jinnah . Thanks for sharing
Hehehehehehehehehehehe
To be continued........
Jinnah was hinduphobe that's what u want people to follow
@@SACRED_HITMAN possible you talking in air , without listening to his speech
@@SanjayChauhanMumbai so u think two nation theory is not hinduphobia
@@SACRED_HITMAN first listen to speech
Thank you for this. So conclusive and so necessary for every Pakistani to understand.
Quaid pointed out two main things here. 1. We can't survive under united Hindustan because matters were politicized at that time and Muslims were in minority. 2. This Hindu Muslim divide was just for the basis of getting a separate country. He wasn't the advocate of hindu Muslim rivalry.
then why muslims left in india??? aren't they minority now but more in mainstream than the minorities of Pakistan...
1. No jinnah didn't said the politics is responsible but the Hindus are the problem which makes him hinduphobe
2. So you mean Pakistan is temporary and it was at that time those conditions
so what is the purpose of getting a separate country as we have seen the results....why did he not configure the divide and rule policy of british..... i am just asking 🤔 as gandhi offered him the whole prime minister ship of india
An eye opener for those who propagate the agenda of religious extremism and caste based division system.
For the matter of fact, if it would have been said in today's Pakistan, he would have been declared a secularist, seditionist and an abrogator to the constitution (Article 6). Jinnah never wanted to create a religious extremist state instead he was determined to create a state of equality working for the benefit of people, debate withstands whether a capitalist or socialist state..
Loved the musical score. Also like that about your other videos. If history can be taught as entertainment . Even TH-cam short clips that would be amazing for the next generation
Qaid ❣️
Jinah was hinduphobe
Sir Mae Jes din sy aap ki videos daik Raha houn aap ny Mera sochny samajny ka dimension hi badal diya.
LUMS University Mae admission leyae bagher TH-cam ki University Ky zareyae parha rahy ho.
Allah aap ko kamyabi dy
جناح صاحب بہت سی باتیں ایسے ہی وثوق سے کہتے تھے پھر بعد میں نتیجہ الٹ نکلا، انہوں نے کہاتھا کہ مشرقی پاکستان کی زبان صرف اردو ہوگی پھر نتیجہ الٹ نکلا، بات یہ ہے کہ پاکستان بننے کے نتیجے میں ہندو طاقت ور ہوگئے اور مسلمان کمزور، ہندستان کا مزید ٹکڑے ہونا چاھئے تھا اور ایک اور ملک ہونا چاھئے تھا ہندستانی مسلمانوں کیلئے، اور ہندو اور مسلمانوں کے درمیان طاقت توازن ہونا چاھئے تھا،جبکہ تقسیم کے نتیجے میں وہ بگڑگیا، مولانا ابوالکلام آزاد سمجھتے تھے کہ تقسیم برصغیر کے مسئلے کا حل نہیں کیونکہ تقسیم کے بعد ہندو اور مسلمانوں کے درمیان موجود اختلافات قانونی شکل اختیار کرے گا بعد میں یہی ہوا یہ اختلاف دو ریاستوں کے درمیان ٹکراؤ کی شکل اختیار کرلی، ابھی بی جے پی کی موجودگی میں ٹکراؤ اور بڑھے گا۔پھر یہ بات بھی ہے ہندووں سے مسئلہ موجودہ ہندستان میں رہنے والے مسلمانوں کے لئے تھا جبکہ سرحد، پنجاب اور سندھ اور موجودہ بنگلہ دیش کے علاقوں میں پہلے ہی مسلمان غالب اکثریت میں تھے انکو ہندووں سے کیا خطرہ تھا؟اسی لئے سب سے زیادہ علحیدہ گی کی تحریک علی گڑھ میں چلی۔
🖤🖤🖤
Thank you for sharing this. Jinnah would be embarrassed in the current situation of Pakistan. Kia thay ham, kahan pohanch gaye ham.
Oho bhai kaha pohnch gaye ? Please tell me kaha? I am scared to death,........
he should be embarrassed of direct action day....
@@samarth5991 he felt really embarassed, coz his target was direct action night not the direct action day
Jinnah was not quad e azam but confuse e azam
@@silentroar8264
And then Ayub khan killed his sister fathima jinnah in direct action night or day...hahahaha
Jinnah the Great
He was hinduphobe
Whats the source of speech text and you translated it yourself?
Thanks anyway 👍🏿
Yes , I myself am looking for the source. Hope Mr.Taimor provides it.
(He should have linked it in description)
No dobut , he was a jolly good fellow. Infact thr best dark comedian of 20th century. ( ofcouse i am talking about film star RANGEELA)
Sounds like Jinnah wanted Pakistan to be secular.
First he claimed that Hindu and Muslims are two separate nations because their religions are different and started a movement for a separate country.
After the creation of Pakistan he claimed that religion is a personal matter and everyone has equal rights. If that's the case there's no need for a separate country.
Jinnah said different things at different times to achieve his objectives. He's a typical politician.
Nope ..Mane Inka lecture suna usme ye Qur'an ki bat krte hain..
Aur akhir ma farmaya ki "every Pakistani must be ready to sacrifice everything for pakistan to make it a bull work of Islam
Go watch why Pakistanis represent the whole ummah? By syed muzammil official
@@zulfizakarya5703 yes americau akbar america is allah for pakistan
Yes, lykin woh Wala secular nahi Jo humain bataya jata hy balky asli Wala secular. Jo equal rights ki bat krta hy.
Religion rayasat se alag hoga ya nahi ye decide karne ka right bhi Pakistani citizens ko hi hai. Jo political system wo chahty hain yahan wohi implement hona chahoye. Agar koi secularism ke khilaaf hai to us ko bhi ye right hai kun ke wo bhi Pakistani citizen hai.
A nation based upon the ideology of islam cannot put sole power in the hands of the citizens. As per sharia, all power comes from Allah and only his system (islamic political system) should be allowed to form.
This I personally believe should be the belief of every muslim. It is so unfortunate that even some muslims label themselves as "liberal" and "secular".
As an Indian I agree with u
Yeah Pakistan Muhammad Ali Jinnah kaey vision per chaleyga nakaey mullah kaey vision per. 🔥
@@mirzakumait1333 islam ke vision pr chlein more specifically
@@umair_qazmi yes exactly remember one thing "Muhammad S.A.W Ka Deen aur hai mullah Ka din aur hai" Hazrat Muhammad S.A.W Allah ki Taraf Tamam Alam e duniya ke liye Amaan aur insaaniyat Ka paegham lekar aey tabhi rehmat UL alameen kahaa Gaya. Nakaey in mullaoun jou sirf Deen o Islam kaey naam per aek dusray mein nafratein taqseem kartey aur Islam Ka naam use karkaey firqa wariyat Kou hawaa detay..
The dream that never was
When Jinnah was building Pakistan. Then he said these words to unite the people of different strata of the society, nothing about the death of Jinnah was shown by the government of Pakistan or the army of Pakistan. On the other hand big bangladesh massacred hindus and then told to stop riots in punjab and east bengal but pakistan govt didn't do anything. pakistan was created with muslims in mind, some hindu lower leaders supported pakistan because they thought the problems of lower and lower people are only upper hindus. At the same time they can live together in the same state, not with the Muslims, so some Hindu lower caste leaders supported this Pakistan proposal. Educated Muslim society thought that if the new Pakistan is real, then Muslims will get jobs instead of the jobs that Hindus are getting, thereby reducing the unemployment of the boys of the Muslim society. The farmers thought that if it was Pakistan then they would be able to take land from these landlords, so they supported it, which did not happen.Hence the creation of Pakistan was a complete failure.
And for those who wonder and ask if partition was a good or a bad thing, I would answer, that it was an after effect of colonialism. The divide and rule game. Similar analogies exist in Morocco and Algeria. Both have the same people, Arabs and Amazighs (Berbers), colonized by France. But these two have very strong rivalries due to land disputes. The nation states in the Middle East, that were split due to the Sykes Picot agreement, and the split of Korea. Colonialism, imperialism, divide and rule. These are the factors that gave rise to modern nation states.
This speech has 2 aspects. one is the secular nature of the state that Quaid thought about Pakistan and the 2nd is the deep realisation that partition on the religious lines might not work.
I am sorry brother , but jinnah made nation on basis of religious discrimination
The man was definitely high on something really potent.
Lovely. Sir being a philosophy teacher do you have any thoughts on dreams? Please share.
but right now pakistan is 100% different from then ?
Agree
ہر بات سولہ آنےbut
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The professor should share his thoughts with us as a result of which Pak project couldn't work.
اگر قائد اعظم سب کے لیے پاکستان چاہتے تھے تو انہوں نے عوام کی ووٹ سے منتخب NWFP موجودہ پختون خواہ کی جمہوری حکومت ختم کرکے وہاں گورنر راج کیوں نافذ کیا؟ کیوں سانحہ بابڑہ کروایا گیا؟ کیوں سانحہ بابڑہ کے زمہ داران کے خلاف کاروائی نہیں کی گئی ؟
یہ داغ داغ اجالا یہ شب گزیدہ سحر
وہ انتظار تھا جس کا یہ وہ سحر تو نہیں
May b the situation compelled Jinnah to give birth to a new nation but whatever West Pakistan did with East Pakistan was absolutely unacceptable.if West Pakistan genuinely considered the Bengali Muslims in East Pakistan to b their fellow citizens then they wouldn't have denied to accept the election result wherein the Awami League emerged victorious.Bhutto was the man behind Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's arrest.the muslim population in East Pakistan was more than that in the West,still govt.spendings were more for West.the West shouldn't have tried to impose Urdu on Bengali speaking Muslims.this step created bitterness between the Bangla speaking Bengali Muslims & the Urdu speaking Bihari Muslims who migrated to the East during partition.Sk.Mujibur always said that Bangladesh shouldn't be built on the basis of Religion.
I guess if Jinnah would have been alive,he wouldn't have allowed the Socio-cultural & Economic oppression the West carried out on the East.
قو م مذہب سے نہیں بنتے اور قوم سے بنتے ہیں جیسا کہ پاکستان نے میں مختلف مذاہب کہ لوگ رہتے ہیں سوال ہیں اپ سے
Sir plz make a video on , rich and poor separate electorate in Pakistan future .
In my honest opinion, I find Jinnah’s personality very obscure and mysterious. It’s hard to truly understand what he was thinking. One one hand he made the speech Aug 11th telling the public that they may belong to any religion caste or creed. This raises the question “can a non Muslim be the head of Pakistan?”, and then on the other hand, he is creating a country on the basis of religion, and slogans such as “If you are a Muslim, join the Muslim League”, “What does Pakistan mean? There is no God but Allah”, “the kalima in the mouth, the sword in the hand, but we will fight for Pakistan”.
In Maulana Azads book “India wins freedom, apparently before Jinnah departed for Karachi, he gave the message to the Indian Muslims that they should stay and remain loyal citizens of India. These words were said by the Muslims who came in tears to Azad complaining that they had been deceived.
Furthermore, Jinnah was known to have authoritarian tendencies. He didn’t like to work under anyone but was known to be short tempered to his subordinates. In an interview, Dr Ishitiaq Ahmed, a Pakistani professor from Sweden, who wrote a large book on Jinnah, acknowledges that Jinnah was very arrogant and aloof. He used to scold Liaquat Ali khan too. I suppose that’s why many Muslim Leaguers were eager for Jinnah to die soon (the way Jinnah died also appears pre mediated - the way his ambulance was deliberately stopped and delayed- also no one came to receive him and Fatima from the airport in Karachi on his last day).
When Jinnah became governor General, he eliminated all opposition parties. In NWFP, there was this party called Khudai Khitmatgars who was lead by Bacha Khan. Khudai Khitmatgars was forcibly dismissed and Bacha Khan along with his brothers languished in jail for many years without a trial.
Also it is asserted but hidden in Pakistan that Jinnah on his deathbed regretted creating Pakistan (I wouldn’t be surprised if he did, given how Muslim League were trying to isolate him by sending him to Ziarat - you are supposed to see a doctor and get treatment for tuberculosis, not go to the hills). The book Fatima Jinnah wrote My brother was banned from publications and when it finally came out, excerpts were missing from it, not to mention that she was totally kept invisible from public after her brothers passing.
Jinnah was a lawyer, not a leader. A very charismatic, witty, smart and shrewd indeed. But a leader makes the vision for his country very clear, writes it on paper and clarifies in clear certain terms where he wants the country to go. Ataturk did, Lenin did, Kim Ill Sung did, Nasser did, Arafat did. Yes they were dictators but they made their visions clear as to where they want to lead their countries. It is also not clear why Jinnah left the Congress. Very vague reasons are given. If Congress was truly a Hindu serving organization, Maualana Azad was the President twice, and many other Muslim leaders and parties were aligned with it.
Muslim League unlike the Congress wanted to keep and maintain the feudal system alive, whereas Congress wanted to abolish it as soon as independence came.
That is why I say that Muslim League wouldn’t have been fans of Marxism nor Socialism.
Quaid used to scold Muslim league leaders because they were feudal lords nawabs.they were not capable enough
Great 👌
Sab ulat ho gya jo Qaid ne kaha tha😔
Acha ulay hua hay ? Oh thnx for letting us know.
In Pakistan, some people disagree with this concept of Jinnah. And also if we saw the history of Pakistan, Jinnah preffer bureacrats over elected political member that trend is still in Pakistan. Is political parties are ressponsible for this situation?
Not the poloitical parties but the renowned folk singer ALLAH DITA LUNE WALA is the sole reason behind this entire post partition mess.
Jinnah never wanted partition but he was leading a party whose majority members wanted it. Jinnah was advocate of equal rights to Muslims. Jinnah was forced to accept partition by Congress and Muslim league leaders especially from Bengal. Jinnah always tried to unify India but Congress betrayed him. Jinnah accepted Cabinet Mission plan A which was about two dominions under one federation. But Congress rejected it. On rejection of Cabinet mission, Jinnah again felt betrayed and then was also forced by Muslim league leaders to accept partition. Congress also accepted partition except Gandhi who was sidelined by other leaders of Congress. Jinnah was a secular person who admired Mustafa kamal. There is much left to disclose as Pakistans former leaders hid it from public and portrayed Pakistan existence with religion whereas long rule of Congress in India erased their involvement in partition from history and hid this aspect from general public. Congress leaders like valabahai patel, Nehru etc are equally responsible for partition. They sidelined Gandhi who was supporter of united India. Jinnah was the symbol of Hindu-Muslim unity. He was part of both Muslim league and Congress till 1920. Muslim league was formed in 1906 as a group of elite Muslims who were loyal to British.
Jinnah initially was siding with a united india but he later on clung to a simple idea that it was not possible. In the late 1930s and in 1940 he showed his courage regarding the partition. This is similar to changing his point of view or ideology with time and it is fine , as the same happened with Iqbal.
For your statement regarding "quaid was secular" I personally wouldn't agree with that. He showed his love and passion for a muslim nation. And he succeeded in that by achieving the first nation to be born in name of islam. He whilst having a high platform said that "islam is the complete code of life" (economically, socially, intellect wise, politically etc) which unfortunately now is not being paid heed to. Moreover, this statement is rather relative regarding his belief towards religion, many differ.
@@umair_qazmi agreed 👍
Cabinet mission happened in 1946. Jinnah accepted plan A it which proposed Indian dominion with two groups of Muslim India (presently Pakistan and West Bengal, Assam, Bangladesh etc) and one Hindu Indian group (presently rest of India). These three units were given administration under a central power. Jinnah accepted this plan and rejected plan B which proposed complete division of provinces. But Congress under Nehru rejected it as they wanted majority of seats in Centre from hindu india. Here British and Congress betrayed Jinnah and Nehru was made interim prime minister. Seeing this injustice, Jinnah was forced by Muslim league leaders to do his part and then Jinnah advocated Direct Action Day and openly called for Pakistan which he previously never did. In 1940, Lahore Resolution which is regarded as the milestone in partition of india was not having any of the description of Jinnah. In fact Muslim.leaders from other parties. Like A.K Fazlul who was leader of Krishak Praja Party presented the resolution. History shows that Jinnah used partition as a bargaining chip for attaining more autonomy to Muslims. Today, in Pakistan you'll find very less information regarding Jinnah's personal life and family. All was done to hid the facts and make narratives. Jinnah belonged to Bohra Ismailia community, married to a Parsi, befriended qadiani community, admired Mustafa Kamals Turkiye, and heed support from the local zameendaars. All the religious Muslim groups including major deobandi scholars Jamiat Ulema e Hind, jamiat ahl e hadees, Jamat e islami, Jamat e ahrar, khaksar Movement by Allama mashriqi and many nationalist Muslims and religious maulana rejected Muslim league's idea of partition. Even fatwa were given against division and promotion of Muttahida Quamiyat concept of pan islamism of Jamaluddin afghani was given as a counter to partition. No one can comment on Jinnah's religion but he was a secular inclusive type of person who joined and befriended various socio-religious groups in subcontinent including Ahmadia who considered them Muslims.
Another counter note: Muslim league's first president was the imam of Nizrari ismaili shia community, Agha Khan the Third. He held presidentship from 1906-1912. Jinnah became president in 1913.
sharam kro....read about direct action day...
how bengali hindus were butcherd, killed, tortured and r@ped just after his famous direct action speech....
my nanny told me all the horrors she went through...
he was a man with so much hate
@@samarth5991 what sharam kro. I have my right to express my beliefs and ideas. If Bangali Hindus were butchered so are the Muslims as Muslims were minorities. Communal rights are common throughout Indian history. It is a not a big deal. Jinnah warned Congress not to betray us otherwise I'll launch protest. He said we don't want war but if you want war then we accept your offer of war. He gave Nehru time to rethink but Nehru and congress does not paid heed to it so Jinnah launched Direct action day. He was forced to do it by Congress and Bengal's chief minister Hussain Shaheed Suhrawardi was leading the procession. East bengalis were rebellious throughout the history. They divided Mughal empire. They divided united Bengal in 1905. They divided United India in 1947 as they were the main architects of Pakistan. They divided Pakistan in 1971. There is a long history of East Bengali resistance. Calcutta riots wrote the partition of Bengal and United India in red ink. This made partition of both Bengal and united India inevitable.
Download kar li he Apny gar walo ko sunao ga insha'Allah ab ham badle gy bohat ho gyi gulami
Can you please make a video Quaid e Azam's and Iqbal's vision for Pakistan. How did it begin? How it evolved from Iqbal supporting Hindu Muslim Ittehad to His Allahabad Address demanding for a separate homeland clearly. What was THEIR VISION (in their addresses/ writings etc)?
Jinnah was confused hinduphobe
The words spoken by jinnanh should have been true but he realized that the people were not even after creating a country for them.
Fir bhi to same problem hai hum ab 20% h humko bhi sath le jate na 40% Muslim to yhi chor ke chle gye the 🇮🇳
There are as many visions of Jinnah about Pakistan as there are people who remember what he said
;IshtiaqAhmed xd
#Pakistan #india #partition #Jinnah #QuaideAzam
This are Jinnah's own words. Not mine.
Please link the source in the description or pinned comment. Thanks.
Yes because he was confuse e azam hinduphobe
@@SACRED_HITMAN ok sharma jee xd
Quaid could forsee the problems and addressed them not all but major ones. Alas Pakistank didn't get a loyal and visionary successor after him.
taimur sab ap naa quade azam ki yaa ak taqrer sonany ka maqsad yaa haa kaa quid azam islamic state nii chaty tha .
lkn agr yaa baat nii haa too baqi saari taqrer bee sonay jooo quaid azam naa ki haa.
Here is the full text. Please show me where he speaks about an Islamic state. Thanks.
www.pakistani.org/pakistan/legislation/constituent_address_11aug1947.html
YES quaid azam didn't wanted an islamic state now cry about it XD
@@Taimur_Laal also link Quaid's appreciation towards islam and his word regarding it.
@@Taimur_Laal Esteemed Sir, I am looking forward a reply from you on my above comments, and will oblised you share some academic reference pointing how terrible communal partition was, in anticipation Thanks
What was his struggle for freedom of india?? Can anybody tell??
Religion has nothing to do with state affairs, then why Pakistan get so much polarized? Sad to see generations blindly follow political entities not nation's Father messege
In an islamic nation, islam has the ability to provide guidance to everything and everyone. Be it politics.
Pakistan was always the confused state for its functional and democratic ideology.
I mean we were divided on the base of religion and after division we decided to take U-turn which was never happened and still striving.
Sir that is the problem with Pakistan today, a confused nation and they have made Jinnah into a personality cult.
Can anybody tell me the name of background music.
Looking at this speech i can say he was very in favor of a secular democratic nation, but then i think maybe this was the stick he used untill the chickens came home to roost. And then we hit extremes
😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
kash quiad e azam pakistan nai banatay ur hum log puniabi army ur giverment k hatay me nai panstay pakistan hum se lia tex hy ur dia bajwa jesay log
or jo log is divideding main KATAL kr diay gaie owrton ka rape howa gaher k gaher jala diay gaie zulum ki aik history raqam ki gaie os ka hisaab kon dy ga?mohammad ali jinnah?pandat johaer lal naharu?Gandhi shab?ya shaytani TAQAT jo ham sub main hai?
یا خود فریبی تیرا آسرا ۔
Esteemed Prof Taimur, I do follow you and your writings, with agreeing to most still academic disagreements I have.
Here issue is of catastrophic communal division of Indian sub continent.
History proved beyond iota of doubt that communal division failed rather aggravated to the extreme.
The region you and I and world call it Pakistan Bangladesh for time immemorial has fairly Muslim domination numerically while other faith flourished with all their religious identity.
I read almost all prominent post partition writers of Pak, India, English and other and have collection of them.
I fail to understand how Muslim league and Congress agreed for catastrophic anti human division of Indian subcontinent.
Muslims lived in hinterland villages from Peshawar (NWFP) to Keral, and elsewhere in substantial number.
History proved minority in Pak and Bangladesh are far away from glittering Media of 21st century and most migrated to India though it was extremely painful but yet feasible to relocate in India, still utter frustrating.
Issue is that majority Muslims were left with no option but to live in India as it was practically impossible to relocate in pauperized four states of Pakistan and it doesn't happen.
These region engulfed in exceptional nature of communal disharmony.
Muslims in India almost literally lost thier political identity and things doesn't appear promising in another walk of life.
Hardly any representation in Legislature Executive and Judiciary.
Provided this unofficially second class citizen.
One is entitled for thier political view, but I have reached to the conclusion only feasible solution to Indian subcontinent was proportional representation /separate electorate.
Now only solace is that this life is not real and will meet all stakeholders in life hereafter and will discuss in great detail for the reasons and circumstances lead to this catastrophic partition of hearts and land. Amir
@Gamerz Mythology, absurd Analogy, communal division lead to commuting of rape and killed body by train in high number, undivided Indian subcontinent must had proportional representation, partition was failure history proved, and further in Life hereafter one will see how worst reward of it will be...... 😭
This is such a difficult topic as Jinnah himself acknowledged in this speech. Muslims in India becoming second class citizens as a consequence of Pakistan is a fact that cannot be ignored. In this respect the Pakistan experiment has fallen short. On the other hand as Jinnah said Pakistan’s inevitably cannot be ignored.
The best solution was to have 15 independent secular states based on ethnicities and EU style Indian union with joint defence, single currency and freedom of movement of people and goods.
@@braveheart8318 EU example appears not very promising, Europeans boundary is precisely of ethnic and language, while under British India solution was proportional representation in power sharing institutions and strong Federal structure, which didn't happen owing to which this region is bleeding slowly and utter painfully continously. Catastrophic communal division was ploy of UK and Congress, ML, RSS and other pathetically failed to sense, extremely painful..... 😭 😭
@@sammybyatt8390 Yes arguably this is tough subject, yet this affected immensely. It failed to solve communal issue rather aggravated. Highly militarised region, problematic education level, Social development, Economic development, and most importantly minorities across the border left for thier ill fate ........ Things with the passage of time going worse still, prayers.
Every line and each statement is Oximoron.
I also strongly believe that Jinnah has a personality cult in the country. Countries such as North Korea, Syria (Haffez Al Asad), Romania (under Ceucescu), USSR (under Stalin), China (under Mao Zedong). Pakistan is nowhere near as extreme as these countries that I mentioned, but the point I am trying to make is that like these leaders, Jinnah is eulogized to the point that he is seen as a saint, who cannot be questioned nor criticized. His pictures are in all government offices, and although it isn’t a crime to criticize nor question him or his motives or even perform a critical analysis; it is seen as very unpatriotic, ungrateful and very taboo to do so. Journalists who criticize the army, ISI, the two nation theory or even Jinnah are shunned, ostracized or silenced. A progressive country does the opposite. It welcomes a free flow of ideas and encourages one to think out of the box.
how come this was/is not part of Social Studies? 🤔
Jinnah and the Muslim League weren’t Marxists nor Socialists though. Many of the Muslim League founders were aristocrats or from feudal backgrounds. It was Nehru who was more of a Socialist, and friends with the USSR, Gamal Abdel Nasser and Yasser Arafat. From what I understand Muslim League would be greatly opposed to Marxism and Socialism as the latter would threaten their social order.
Comrade I keep listening to your online lectures and talks and learn a lot from you. But here I can't agree with you. No doubt this is a nice speech of Jinnah but if we seek guidance from jinnah's speeches, they are conflicting. (We have rely on his speeches as he has not written even a pamphlet). Majority of his speeches are essentially fundamentalist. How can one follow the society of 7th century which he has advocated so many times. He was a staunch anti communist and put Pakistan in US camp. I simply mean that Jinnah is not a leader to be followed by progressives. As an academician you obviously have to teach your students neutrally but it becomes difficult to distinguish ideologically as you are leader of a Marxist party as well.
So in your opinion, Pakistan was created to be an Islamic state?
@@Taimur_Laal Well Taimoor I guess sultan sahib is making some other point here. What’s your take on that.
@@Taimur_Laal "pakistan ka kyaam aik laboratory ki misaal hai jismein hum islam pr azadi-e-dil se amal krsken." Who said that?🥸
Jinnah was wrong Abdul Kalaam Azaad was right
teri dadi ka yaar ha Absul Kalaam
according to his speech Do qomi nazariya tail lene gaya yehi kaam india me reh kar bhi hosakta tha
do not forget to tell the horrors of direct action day please...
have some sympathy for those who are not with us today...
Jan yehi karna tha to Pakistan kyun banaya.
Lekin waha siasat he mazhab k naam par hoti hai isiliye Shia ko ziarat ashoora padhne nahi detay aur aapke mulk mei Dehshat gard tanzeemu ki political part hai wow
Is se secularism kaha se sahit hoti hai
Ye sb to ain islam k mutabiq hai
Islam ne jb hakoomat ki hai to kisi ghair muslim k sath zyadti nahi hui hai
Mind it. Islam ne jb hakoomat ki
Muslaman ne nahi
Iqbal b ne b farnaya tha
جدا ہو دیں سیاست سے تو رہ جاتی ہے چنگیزی
Sir Taimur,Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali jinnah neither wanted a Secular state ,neither a Socialist state,neither a capitalist state or Religion state.
He wanted to create pure Islamic State by implementing Deen from the guidance of Quran e Majid.
This is why Pakistan was created ,otherwise India became secular as well,their Founding Fathers openly used to say they are Socialist,many Mullahs were against the creation of Pakistan.
Then what was the need ,what wss the real cause for thr creation of Pakistan?
Pakistan was demanded because a Muslim cannot live in freedom,dignity,unless they are living under their own system of "Deen"
That is why Muhammad Ali Jinnah RA struggled to make Pakistan.and when it comes to "Deen" A muslim cannot be liberal,Secular, Socialist,Communist or another thing being a Muslim.
That is why a pure Islamic State was demanded in order to safe guard the rights of Muslims.
And I also want to share this ,there is no need to be a Marxist neither we have the choice.
Quran e Majid's economic system is based on "Ishtarakiat" and Hazrat Umar RA never allowed anyone to buy Landownership and he the then Islamic State was against the Feudalism and todays capitalism and neo liberalism.
Whatever he wanted he was hinduphobe
That's your interpretation which is ambiguous.
A pork eater and wine drinker wouldn't strive for a mad theologist nation.
@@abdullahsaif9196 there is nothing ambiguous in my interpretation!
@@abdullahsaif9196 won't say anything about pork or wine but he has strived for more than 35 years in order to achieve the great historical achievement.
Beggers can not be choosers😂😂
Jinnah now :Ye kya bawasir bana diya hai 😂😂😂
Beggaristan 😂🤣
قاید اعظم
یا
جناح صاحب
نے اپنی ساری
زندگی میں صرف
ایک تقریر کی ،
گیارہ اگست ۱۹۴۷ کو
پاکستان بننے سے تین دن پہلے ،
اس کے علاوہ
وہ زندگی بھر گونگے رہے اور یہ تقریر کرتے ہی فوت ہو گئے ۔
اس لیے
سیکولر، لبرل، ملحد لوگوں
کے نزدیک “ جناح صاحب “
نامی بندے کا اس کے علاوہ نہ کوئی وجود تھا اور نہ کوئی مصرف ۔
اور
اس کا کوئی وجود تھا تو وہ ناقابل اعتبار ۔
اس لیے ایسے بد دیانت
دان شوروں
کا کل حدود اربعہ بس یہی ہے