Pujya Acharyaru atyanta knowledgeable person. Yavade vichara pravachana madidaru deep understanding iratte. Mukhyavagi tumba practical. He is most needed guru for modern times. I have heard more than 1000 hrs of his pravachana, in various topics and none of them have a single fault. He is a real guru.
Sexosophy, Philosophy without sex and sex without philosophy has no meaning, then his thoughts clashes with life syles of great spiritual personalities like Ramana, Ramakrishna paramahamsa, Shankarachaarya....
@girish with all due respect your blind comments have no meaning. Sex here refers to practicality, every person's needs. It doesn't refer to involve in sex all the time. Every gods have partners and have children which proves that they never barred sex. Once the man's sexual need is satisfied he moves on to pursue other areas. Sex is the basic dharma (ofcourse being faithful to partner). Having said that Sages like Shankaracharya are devoid of sex because they have come to earth solely to be gurus and impart spirituality and hence exception. This is Dharma of Saints and sages to be devoid of sex and for that matter devoid of any other worldly pleasures. No where in sahastra it says you should avoid sex, it says to be limited with sex and dont overdo it. It is in this meaning acharya has explained. What is wrong in this? There is no problem in saying "sex without philosophy really has no meaning". Other philosophers are not bold enough to say this in confidence in public. That's the only difference.
Bannanje Govindacharya philosophy is very practical real and he is courageous to speak what is real and truth Sexosophy. We have to overcome sexual aspiration by knowing it's limitation. He achieved God realisation through sva-adhyaya pravavhan. More and more we listen to his pravachan we get the clarity. Well explained by Pramod sir
Pujya Acharyaru atyanta knowledgeable person. Yavade vichara pravachana madidaru deep understanding iratte. Mukhyavagi tumba practical.
He is most needed guru for modern times. I have heard more than 1000 hrs of his pravachana, in various topics and none of them have a single fault. He is a real guru.
ಬನ್ನಂಜೆ ಎಂಬ ಅದ್ಭುತ ಅದ್ಭುತ ಅದ್ಭುತ. ಸಾಕ್ಷಾತ್ ಸರಸ್ವತೀ ಪುತ್ರ.
Gurudeeva Bannanje
Bannajeyavara nenapu kaduttide thanks
Super thanks for posting
Very nice.
Nice one
Sexosophy, Philosophy without sex and sex without philosophy has no meaning, then his thoughts clashes with life syles of great spiritual personalities like Ramana, Ramakrishna paramahamsa, Shankarachaarya....
@girish with all due respect your blind comments have no meaning. Sex here refers to practicality, every person's needs. It doesn't refer to involve in sex all the time. Every gods have partners and have children which proves that they never barred sex. Once the man's sexual need is satisfied he moves on to pursue other areas. Sex is the basic dharma (ofcourse being faithful to partner). Having said that Sages like Shankaracharya are devoid of sex because they have come to earth solely to be gurus and impart spirituality and hence exception. This is Dharma of Saints and sages to be devoid of sex and for that matter devoid of any other worldly pleasures.
No where in sahastra it says you should avoid sex, it says to be limited with sex and dont overdo it.
It is in this meaning acharya has explained. What is wrong in this? There is no problem in saying "sex without philosophy really has no meaning".
Other philosophers are not bold enough to say this in confidence in public. That's the only difference.
Bannanje Govindacharya philosophy is very practical real and he is courageous to speak what is real and truth Sexosophy. We have to overcome sexual aspiration by knowing it's limitation. He achieved God realisation through sva-adhyaya pravavhan. More and more we listen to his pravachan we get the clarity. Well explained by Pramod sir
Girish he is tel truee
Answer to your doubt is in this conversation only...Please listen attentively..
@@vpmanoharvp9897 kg k ki kmjjh uh hu hu hu
U can yupll