Secret Weapons DO NOT Exist!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024
- Subscribe to the main channel / millennium7historytech
Go Fund Me for my first book! gofund.me/11d5...
Join this channel to support it:
/ @millennium7historytech
Support me on Patreon / millennium7
One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com....
Join the Discord server / discord
AFFILIATE LINK:
Buy an Aircraft Model at Air Models! airmodels.net/...
----------------------------
Ask me anything!
Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below!
forms.office.c...
--------------------
Visit the subreddit!
/ millennium7lounge
---------------------
All images and additional video segments contained in the Thumbnails and/or B-roll segments are used in strict compliance with the appropriate permissions and licenses required from the source and in accordance with the TH-cam Partner Program, Community guidelines & TH-cam terms of service.
----------------------------
Ask me anything!
Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below!
tinyurl.com/y4...
--------------------
Visit the subreddit!
/ millennium7lounge
---------------------
All images and additional video segments contained in the Thumbnails and/or B-roll segments are used in strict compliance with the appropriate permissions and licenses required from the source and in accordance with the TH-cam Partner Program, Community guidelines & TH-cam terms of service.
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
*Secret weapon: NO*
*Secret capabilities: YES*
^this^
Yea I agree with that. Who tf knows what the F35 can REALLY do. I’m sure we only know a portion of the capabilities.
@@joeybulford5266 We know more than DARPA would like us to know... because they had to go public with a fair amount of it's capabilities in order to counter media hackery. But there's still some things which either remain undisclosed, or are public, but not broadly understood. At the end of the day though, it IS an export product, which means "somewhat" less secrecy.
@@kathrynck the problem with this video is that it’s completely impossible to counter argue for several reasons. The most fundamental one is this:
- There are no secret weapons
- yes there are
- prove it
- how?
- show me one
- eerrrr….?
Define what “secret” means? Something that no one knows ever? That’s impossible.
Something YOU don’t know? Something most people don’t know?
For example for quite some time no one knew about the rq180. We still have no pictures of it.
Are you so absolutely certain there’s nothing you are not aware of?
It was easy to hide some new weapons in pre internet era. But nowadays it's impossible to keep something completely secret.
Even then... you can build some prototypes and play with them at groom lake, and possibly keep the circle of people as small as 5000 or so.
But when you go to large scale production, that would grow to about 50,000 in the production line, plus dozens of subcontractors, and then tens of thousands of military personnel who'll receive production units, maintenance depots, janitors, people who simply live across the street from air force bases. You rapidly go from 5000 people which you can realistically keep high-clearance, to 150,000 people which you can't possibly keep high clearance.
And that's before camera phones and internets ;)
Nothing is ever completely secret, this is a nonsense standard and by yours and the video creator's criteria there has never been a secret anything ever.
Israel had fielded the Tamuz (Spike NLOS) long-range ATGM back in the early 80s and kept it, along with its launch platforms, secret for three decades. The Pereh missile carrier was only declassified right before retirement.
@@kathrynck Not everything needs to be in large scale production to be effective. The F-117A was very effective but was only produced in small numbers.
@@camt8804 Yeah, it was also VERY abnormally cheap to make. It's an outlier in this topic.
I wonder if the opposite exists - the weapons that they know don’t work, but they hype them anyway as a deterrent because to admit they don’t work would encourage an attack.
Very risky strategy. One example was the Reagan's Star Wars in the '80s
Isn't it normal hold the uber weapon in reserve like yamato
Not exactly.. it's even worse that way in fact.. you only encourage your adversaries to work harder than you to beat you ..And it ALWAYS works for your adversary... The USSR lived everyday with the assumption of military inferiority to the West in the initial years of the cold war and they found out much later that their tanks were superior to early western designs..the T62 , 64 and 72 all introduced armor tech with composite filling and ERA wedged in the armour capable of stopping Western HEAT rounds head on from the front whilst Western tanks were just thick steel that Soviet tank guns melted through.. That was the result of over hyping your tech to your enemy. Your enemy leapfrogs you by decades. Had a large scale conventional war been fought between the USSR and NATO, T72s were going to slaughter Leopard 1s, M60s, Chieftains etc.....
I can give other examples... What you describe happens a lot... It's usually done by clueless politicians. The people that actually work with the hardware never over hype it. F22 and F35 pilots don't believe they're invisible and invincible in their jets... They exercise caution and adhere to training strictly.. The over hyping will be done by an idiot president who knows nothing about the machine..
That's every Russian and Chinese weapon lol.
The problem is that any "secret programme" by definition isn't going to be in mass production and therefore not available in enough quantity to actually make a difference in a protracted conflict against a near peer enemy.
Stealth blackhawk is probably real but also can't hurt you unless your high up on someone's sh*t list.
F-117A?
@@camt8804 No, the things they hit OBL's compound with.
@@memeticist No I'm saying the F-117A had initial operational capacity in 1983, was revealed to the public in 1988 and flew 1,300 sorties in the gulf war in 1991. A platform people knew nothing about 3 years before.
@@camt8804 Fair enough, but that is not likely to be replicated today in the internet era and in conflict with a peer opponent.
Keeping an operational weapon system a secret is becoming much harder. Also, the 59 F-117A likely had a significant effect on the small state of Iraq, with a relatively primitive air defence network. The effect would be substantially mitigated against a peer.
@@camt8804there were sightings of "weird objects".
Nowadays it's going to be online straight away
haha i have always found the "usa has secret alien technology super weapons" individuals so hilarious
Secret weapons are not suitable for deterrence nor power projection. But once. They can't be trained to the troops in large scale either.
Perhaps the real NGADs are the B21's that are fitted with AIM-174's along the way.🤣
Seriously, as a kid who was in awe of the so called secret aircraft detailed in pop.science and pop mechanics (i.e. XB70 like satellite launcher, Aurora Hypersonic etc.) , these rumored airplanes have been around since somebody knew about "Area 51". If it is too good to be true, it probably isn't.
Talked to a Northrop guy 2 years ago about ngad he said the requirements where crazy and that they really might just go with a missile armed b21 for ngad 😂
There _are_ exotic prototypes :) those do exist.
It's just impossible to go to large scale production & deployment in secret.
I actually heard somewhere that this may be the plan for ngad.
the b21 has the means for the datalink network already. it has hella range without relying on external tanks and whatnot. it can't carry (launch) missiles I heard but I don't think that would be too hard of a change to make.
@@kavinbala8885 I read that on Warzone.
Issue also is, modern drone surveilliance. What apparently isn't feasible for the US military, is to make its bases, including remote ones, drone-safe.
Something small and reasonably simple, from winged drones to multicopers to balloons, is impossible to keep out 100%.
Perhaps the area where some wonder weapon is needed the most, is air defense
Drones can't see through walls... There are secret stealth blackhawks that have been used that still really aren't known about by most people.
@@thomgizziz if they're always indoors, they don't fly. If they don't fly, they can't be tested. If they aren't tested, they don't work. If they're outdoors, they'll be seen eventually.
Stealth Black Hawks were buit long ago, and there's like five of them. It's a modification that is useful for some rare spec ops insertions, apparently not for wide use. So hardly a game changer like a mass produced hypersonic plane would have been.
Secret weather balloons invading US airspace.
And even when level of secrecy is extreme, there are still leaks.
And especially in regards to performance, there's lots of people capable of doing very sophisticated guesstimates, which together with leaks and actual footage, tends to get you a LOT of reasonably reliable information.
Never forget what happened back in the 80s. When a computer game company created a game for the F-117, and this caused the US security services to kneejerk react, because their simulation almost perfectly nailed down the performance of the plane.
And yet there was zero espionage or even leaks. The company simply hired a veteran pilot with a degree in aeronautic engineering and an aerodynamics expert. And then they looked at the by then almost nonexistant information that existed about the plane, and GUESSED.
And again, they literally nailed it within low single-digit percentages in every way.
This was just a game company just hiring the first 2 experts on the subject they could find.
"tends to happen with the americans"
Because many yanks simply cannot handle even the concept that they may not be the masterrace and rulers of the world.
"sorry for"
No no, please keep doing "walkie-talkies". Gets you out and about as per doctors orders and gets us another video, usually on some intersting subject like this that is otherwise too minor to make a full-length video about.
I learned to love walky-talky videos thanks to Alex Christoforou, as he travels a lot and thanks to that, we get a lot of sunny beaches on Cyprus, but also plenty of walks through cities all over Asia and eastern Europe, often very beautiful or interesting places, and several people have taken up the format in the last few years.
imd gre gessing😂😂😂😂😂😂
Typical Amerikkk 🕊️🪓
In the 1950s, toy manufacturer Renwal produced a model of the USS George Washington SSBN based on open data and speculation, which end up to be correct and inadvertently leaking its structure, inspiring the design of China's first nuclear submarine.
Well, there are an abnormally large amount of "black projects" in the US.
And some of them have prototyping, or technology exploration vehicles.
But any procurement of significant scale, pretty much has to be public. Going from prototyping to production, and then deployment, maintenance, etc. Just increases the number of personnel involved exponentially, as well as making at least a visual look at the hardware impossible to avoid. On top of that, any major production involves such expense that it outreaches the funds of black projects. The USAF would _LOVE_ to keep something like the B-21 secret. But they need a few hundred billion dollars to buy them, which means they gotta hold out the tips jar to congress, and congress is about as airtight as a spaghetti strainer.
There _are_ secret "capabilities" though. Either in the form of completely unmentioned functionality, or in the form of misrepresented performance metrics, or in the form of deliberately obfuscated purposes/methods, etc. Sometimes the timeline of deployment is publicly inaccurate as well. Deploying systems or "versions" before the publicly listed deployment dates. Once in a while, the other way around. There are even items which are made public, but then downplayed as being very minor and unimportant while procured (openly), when nothing could be further from the truth (for example "skeet" munitions).
The most glaring exception was the F-117A. Of which 64 were manufactured in secret. That's the record holder, numerically. Those were made without a proper production line, more or less by hand, and about 50% from off the shelf parts. They may not even have complete parts interchangeability, due to their "handmade" production (one might have 2 panels where another has one larger panel, etc). There are many secret prototypes over the years. And a few other secret production/procurements, but none as numerous as the F-117. And the only reason the F-117 was as numerous as it was, is that it's actually a relatively low-tech aircraft. Apart from it's shape and coating, the rest of it's components are more akin to an A-10 in tech level. That made it somewhat easier to build a limited number of them in secret. They were made because it was believed, at that time, that a small number of secret-asset ground-attack stealth aircraft could have a disproportionately large impact in a major conflict. And they became public knowledge as soon as the were destined to be deployed to desert storm, where they would become much more visible to wandering eyes. But truly, the F-117A is an outlier. If they had cost more than $60m per unit (and most super-secret items do), they couldn't have made 64 of them quietly at groom lake.
There were some operational aircraft which hid in the publicly-visible shadow of the SR-71, and looked extremely similar, but not a great many, and they ultimately ended up becoming cannibalized for parts for the SR-71. There's a few other examples, but there aren't any "fully secret aircraft" in any significant numbers. Building 64 F-117A's in secret was very much an anomaly.
We have historic examples: _the bomb_ of the Manhattan project that was not secret to the Soviets and produced only in few numbers before being proliferated, and the F-117A, You mentioned which was revealed shortly before it's first mission - which like all aircraft was only devastating if armed nuclear (still one of the best - or possibly - 'peak procurement' programs in the US, considering technological concept and execution - all without spending billions of USD).
@@christophmahler The F-12 really drove home the difficulty (expense) of an entirely secret deployment in the early 1960's. And even then, would have been impossible without a recon version which looked almost identical, to eliminate the risk of visual exposure. I can't think of much which actually went "operational" (even in very limited numbers) between that and the F-117A. Although, it's a bit simpler with anything nuclear, as you need a lot of high clearance personnel around that no matter what, it's kind of an unavoidably included expense for nuclear items.
@@kathrynck
"The F-12 (...)"
The CIA operated A-12 reconnaissance craft, yes.
A remarkable development - yet proving that a serial produced F-12 interceptor was unfeasible while the Air Force eventually took the covert A-12 in as their overt SR-71.
The programs being reminiscent of flying cars - technically in reach, and yet practically elusive... likely the reason why people wish there were a retro program of manned hypersonic flight, much like the Artemis Moon program that must exist to maintain prestige...
@@christophmahler Well, 'officially' anyway.
Unofficially, about 20 YF-12's, but with the SR-style forward chine shape, were found by accident in a hangar in the 1980's. To be fair, from the photo, some of them might have been SR's. Only a few are clearly visible, the rest is just a tailfin count. All seemed to be in a partially cannibalized condition (parts for the SR's no doubt). These would all be outside of "official" airframes, which isn't hard to figure out given how few archangel aircraft were "officially" built. It was photographed, and published. But was subsequently ghosted/scrubbed.
Basically new base commander wanted to refurbish a large unused hangar, cut the padlock and got a surprise. And the people involved didn't have any real security training or any debriefing on what to say or not say, so 'stuff happened'. I do think taking a pic for the local paper was perhaps overtly silly though.
With partial disassembly, there was a really good look at the RAM geometry inside the wing perimeter too. Which in the 1980's would have been somewhat sensitive info. But not outside of the range of things you could read about in "future fighters" type literature then.
I find it incredibly unlikely that it went unnoticed by near peers though. Compromised is compromised. And the tech is 1950's vintage, and there aren't any archangels still in service in over 2 decades now, so... it's kinda hard to think of it as a state secret.
I only bring it up as an example that you can have "a few" "operational" assets which remain under the black projects umbrella. But it's very expensive and very hard to do. The F-117A's were made in a considerably larger quantity though. And didn't enjoy the "easy deniability" of looking extremely similar to a publicly known aircraft.
I guess another example (not of an aircraft though) might be the AIM-174B. It went public recently, but interestingly it's status was "already in service" at the time when it went public.
There's "a bit" of secret planes (and such) in the US, historically. But broadly speaking, I agree with M7's overall point. The black projects umbrella only stretches so far.
Now "secret prototypes", gees, there's a lot of that. ;)
Thanks for this video … been arguing this point for years!
🦆👩🚀📆🧲🦞🐧🦆
"Russia wants to over claim". I thought it was the opposite. It starts with business needs i.e. advertising. And of course continuing with "our stuff is the best". Has always been like that.
ALL of the manufacturers want to over-claim.
In Russia, they largely allow this, as it makes a nice feather in their hat in projecting "implied' military strength in the international political scene. But to be fair, over-stating capabilies is a valid approach to misdirection. It's over-used in Russia, but it has it's uses.
In the US... the DoD forbids it ...FOR any really potent and important item. If it's a really important system, they want things grossly under-stated. Meanwhile, the DoD doesn't care if manufacturers brag about lower-tech lesser items. Ironically, this leads many americans to believe that their worst hardware is their best hardware, and vice versa. Which is a form of misdirection. Once in a while it comes back to haunt the DoD though, for example, when they _want_ to retire an obsolete plane with a big gun, but congress won't let them because of the inverse-hype they've allowed to proliferate.
@@kathrynck Oh, I remember how the USA were pushing F-104, I've been following the JSF programme from it's very beginning. And I can say the level of over statement the US has achieved is enormous. Russia is like 100 years behind in this technology 😅
@@olexp9017 Delusional. Now tell me about the felon...
@@olexp9017 yes, or that "Russia is fighting with shovels" "missiles are left for 2-3 days" "they take microchips out of washing machines" After that a sane person would never believe the media, but americans have a short memory and they do not learn
@@thomgizziz What exactly is delusional? The over claims about the F-104 or F-35? And what should I tell you about the Su-57? What kind of over claims the Sukhoi bureau has made?
"Has the SR-72 finally entered production??" by Sandboxx. Little bit different approach than here.
haha that channel is so obviously just pr0 pag anda
@@leight420 yes, us propaganda. Like this one is russian propaganda. Its useful to check both sides. And facts mentioned here and there are verifiable.
@@rjcork 😂🤦🤦
Secret weapons?
The reality is that West is looking for 155 mm shells everywhere :)
ha ha! ++++++++++
Oh wow, 155mm shells. The thing Ukraine really needs but is second to air power in US doctrine. Saying shit like this just indicates you don't know what you are talking about
@@hresvelgr7193 I hope that was a sarcasm post? 🤣
@@hresvelgr7193 Well, he's right, so far as western europe is concerned.
The US has barely scratched the surface of their stockpiles in sending aid to Ukraine. But the rest of europe has had abysmal stockpiling of ordinance for many decades. Even though the US has sent more aid than the the rest of NATO combined, it's had almost zero impact on US stockpiles. There's still 3,600 "spare" M-1's parked in the desert, for example, of which 64 have been sent to Ukraine.
Mostly the US is treating Ukrainian aid as a cheaper alternative to scrapping old stock. Sending expired missiles to ukraine for them to 'use' is actually cheaper than careful disassembly of old explosives. Most european countries though... terribly under-equipped for any sort of serious warfighting, and they really are very depleted by sending aid to Ukraine. Some western european countries are truly worried about running out of shells to send to Ukraine. The US is only concerned with not sending more than their "spare production capacity", without allowing it to have any measurable affect on US stockpiles.
@@preludeh22a57 I hope you understand that the West prioritises air power over artillery. It's the real reason Russia produces more standard 155mm shells
Something like the SR-72 isn't a weapon. You only need 3 or 4 to be useful operationally. It could be operational now.
NGAS, fully agree. It takes hundreds or thousands to change a battlefield... same as a rail gun or attack laser.
The problem is that nobody asks the question, how a hypersonic vehicle is to transmit broadband reconnaissance data...
There is a reason why the SR-71 was retired despite a last ditch effort to implement 'near real time' data-links in a few units.
The actual SR-72 is likely related to the Waverider research - that is being reduced to a hypersonic missile, rather than any sort of manned aircraft.
Lasers are useless as weapons, due to Earth curvature and severe degradation of the beam in Earth atmosphere, and if you add in the equation the huge amounts of energy necessary to maintain a high rate of fire and high power, and relatively cheap ways to counter and defend against, is obvious not a great weapon at least, not now or in the near future, except to burn small and slow drones - and even there a ww2 era old AA gun outperform them !
And do not even mention the RailGunCrap ! Rail Guns were exposed as the most stupid and biggest blunder of US DoD, once exposed are inferior to missiles on all aspects ( warhead, range, manoeuvrability, accuracy, RoF, etc).
no sr72 or hyper jet in the US as they barely could run the sr71 a fail in its self ....all hype as US propaganda BS
@@christophmahler It's weird that you would choose now to say this "how a hypersonic vehicle is to transmit broadband reconnaissance data" when we get to watch Starship reentry in real time from Mach 25 all the way to splashdown for the past couple of years. It's pretty obvious that data communication in the hypersonic envelope is a solved problem.
@@JoelKleppinger
"It's pretty obvious that data communication in the hypersonic envelope is a solved problem."
I'm not a physicist, so I can't present the math (see e.g. the article 'The Physics and Hype of Hypersonic Weapons' by the Scientific American Magazine in 2021 - EDIT: see also the 'Hypersonic Systems Initiative' at the University of Notre Dame which addresses the physics of radio communication through ionized plasma) - but in orbit there is no atmospheric drag that creates high temperatures, and there is clear sight to thousands of STARLINK satellites.
The SR-71 didn't fly that high (100 km as the arguably lower boundary of space), against which operation a main argument was the very advance of satellite sensors and communication.
Take satellites away in a major war and the reason why there was advocacy at all to reactivate the SR-71 in the 1990s becomes evident (see the respective Congress debates).
All broadband data-links - like that of the JSF are subsonic/trans-sonic - explaining why to hold on to the JSF, instead of just shooting a network of supersonic unmanned drones over contested airspace, when needed.
So, apologies if my mastering of physics is elementary at best (thus listening to this channel e.g. when it comes to aerodynamics), but in my impression from discourse in literature, the differences between atmospheric and orbital flight is crucial when it comes to the technical challenges of hypersonic aircraft (including missiles).
EDIT: to the very contrary of Your statement, I would go as far as claiming that the entire SpaceX set up - including the flimsy ARTEMIS program and the exploration of Mars blablabla is merely a front for the military capability of orbital reconnaissance in the moment of satellite losses (out-sourced from federal NASA) - explaining as well the seemingly close political networking (involvement in US foreign policy operations in Ukraine).
That's what secret weapons _want_ you to think.
If secret weapons don't exist, what was the Manhattan Project?
the way he snarled when he the "ThE FrEnCh" hahahahaha
Ho Ho Ho, jingle bells, uh, s
And there was Dr Strangelove's doomsday machine of cobalt warheads that did not work so well as a deterrent.
Wouldn't have mattered. They were all completely insane in that movie anyway ;)
Combat aircraft made in large numbers are impossible to hide. On the other hand low quantity of highly specialized planes are possible to keep secret. Not likely, but possible. I can imagine some kind of black program... Skunk works has long tradition in this. Something like succesor to X-37 for example
Energy cells. Our government has energy cells that are hundreds of times as power-dense as batteries. The problem is that if their design gets out, then electricity theft and geopolitical instability will occur at a rapid pace.
The problem is energy conversion rates and life cycle costs.
I can name several of these power cells "with higher energy density than [Lithium Ion] batteries."
~ Lithium-Sulfur
~ Lithium-Air
~ Aluminium-Air
~ Magnesium ion
~ Sodium ion
~ Hydrogen fuel cells
The only recent historic examples I can think of were the F-117 and the first atomic bomb. At least the latter one certainly qualifies. The deterrence there was to intimate that there were more than two bombs, which there weren’t. Don’t think something similar to the Manhattan Project could happen these days, perhaps only on the very small scale.
We need nuclear powered Otis
i wondered about the idea of high altitude or orbital lasers, after the photos of the aftermath of the massive fire in Hawaii. With various unburnt objects that where blue in color. Recently i saw photos of some of the damage Iran received from Israels airstrike. What stood out to me. Was the number of blue roofed buildings in an area that received tactical military airstrike.
It definitely used to be true at a time.
Courius here… the F117 has been a secret weapon in a certain sense for some time, or not?
There were rumours etc. thing with today is everyone has a Camera, everyone can share information instantly.
I doubtful but won’t rule out there’s some laser gun somewhere
Well, b2 started as a secret program even if its initial production plant was kept secret
I believe they publicised it as a Ford facility
Mhmm, that depends.
An example for me of a secret weapon would be F 117 circa desert storm. That was a secret weapon.
The question is whether there is a current one.
The answer is maybe, maybe not. Its a matter timing.
To defeat China you only need Virginia's, Seawolf, Ohio SSGN in the straits if Malaca.
Precision strikes anywhere in the world has been around since the '60's. I believe the term is ICBM.
Also a super potent weapon can prevent the opponent from fighting. If they know not the cause but only the effect, that is geometrically effective.
SEA- Crate (ship) English concrete hulls❤
The amount of secrecy that has to be kept intact in todays digital world makes it highly highly unlikely.
It was easier during then1940's, with the manhatten project.
Wait… are you telling me that the Stargate isn’t real?!?!
😄
Perhaps, rumors about such secret weapon can be a pre war psyop?
If the Americans are the people who believe it, then the term is *"Cope"*
The people that shout secret weapons are 12 or 13 year olds, so don't waste too much of your time addressing them. As you said, secret programs are a thing, but even those are difficult to keep under wraps.
The US secret weapon is the DJI Drones from China XDDDDD
Why don't you take Otis with you when you go on a walk?
He is not designed for country footpaths...
Im recalling dr strangelove and the doomsday 💣
Thank you. these people always comment bomb me if i DARE to speak either bad about "insert western weapon system" or good thing about "insert eastern weapon system". For these people they dont care about any kind of objectivity , most often their sources are some media trash talk into nothing. In acctual discussion of matter their lack of knowledge usually becomes very apparent fast. Though some blame is also to be put on the mass of TH-camrs who dont have any real idea what they are talking about teaching them stuff...
Thank you for your video.
M7 shorts... 10 minutes kek
Not exactly short. I agree😉
japan had secret weapon in WW2. so secret that their soldiers were not told how to use it. that was brilliant. and im not making this up. it was special shell for yamato battleship. shell was suppose to explode under the enemy ship but nobody was told how it works so they aimed to enemy ship not under it. it did not go well for japan.
Not quite true, it was more a techique. They aimed in front of the ship so the shell would hit the underside. It worked super-good... if that specific scenario ever would have happened(stationary capitalships at just the right distance) they would´ve hit hard;)
The more secret, the less useful...
0:34 Funny. I hear the same thing from the Chinese when I fight them on X. :-)
It sounds like this dude has sour grapes and is coping hard especially with how much the war in Ukraine has show us about the reality of what both the US and russia claimed vs what the systems can do.
So you don't want to talk about the flying saucers? Denying it??? After all Otis looks a bit saucer-like to me. I see now this whole channel has been a coverup from the start
Dont they have secrete germ warfare weapons or potential weapons at Porton Down in UK thats been kept locked away since the war ?
They do look at the T-14 Armata. Nobody has seen them in Combat. But the Russians say that they are, so they must be invisible, because Russians never lay!
Except for the telegram videos showing them in ukraine😂
His main stream media won't show anything positive or just balanced with zero biases@@nemanja162
@@nemanja162 who cares about real Telegram videos? It was never mentioned at CNN- that's what matters for typical US "critical thinker"! 🤣
And the countless video showing them in combat in Ukraine. Americans like you make all Americans look ignorant.
@@nemanja162 - but CNN say so ! 🤣🤣🤣
Steath hawk anyone? Secret for 30 years?
This guy is so full of shit.
What sort of secret weapons do the french have?😂
Hypersonics
top and bottom parts of French flag are detachable! But that's not much of secret =))))
@@millennium7shorts926 So france has magical secret weapons which meet all your arbitrary nonsense qualifications of being widely usable BUT the country that spends the most money on defense in the world doesn't. Wow you are butt hurt about something, did america steal your candy?
@@millennium7shorts926 - hyperfrogs, you mean :p
@@millennium7shorts926actually you would be surprised by the radar technology they have but that’s a secret…😂
WAlk dis Way😂
How would we know if they exist or not lol
The Manhattan Project begs to differ but I see your point.
Those were HIGHLY different times before the Internet, and even then the Soviets managed to find out about it.
eaxactly
@@j4genius961 There's a difference between what states know and what the rest of us know. The Chinese may know all about the SR-72 but they're not making TH-cam videos about it.
BS, educate yourself read some decent History books, Stalin knew about the bomb even before Truman ! Are you aware the soviets had several spies reporting back to Moscow right in the inner circle ?! Who kept the soviets informed since inception ?
The Manhattan Project got a working prototype going, and the entire world knew about it three weeks later.
We Americans remember the F-19. That was the presumptive designation for the rumored "stealth fighter", which turned out to be the F-117, which was a pretty big program (59 airframes), and already operational by the time it was publicly revealed. If I recall correctly, it was to be a "silver bullet" that could penetrate Soviet air defenses and take out critical targets. So it was a "secret weapon" for only a little while, because it simply became impractical to constrain training flights to nighttime only.
too much Hollywood movies 😅
Russia depends on "soon to be ready" wunderwaffen.
According to the MSM and the Western establishment every Western weapon system is a "Wunderwaffe" tbh.
Which one are they 'depending' on ?
The shovel isn't that advanced and it is currently bringing NATO governments to collapse, one after the other.
lil bro is so goofy🤣🤦
After SU-57 "is a masterpiece," its skin closeup shots, I started more critically your videos.
Now, we have an F-117 program, which flew for 10 years covert and introduced like fully functional system "out of the blue".
Stealth Black Hawk was also a surprise.
Also, it was a surprise that you didn't know it.
There were pictures circulating for years before the Gulf War.
Looking at 4th prototype without a stealth frame made for limited flight tests alone and calling it badly made Su-57... and at the same time calling yourself critycal thinker? What an irony
@millennium7shorts926
"Prior to the official photos, there was no clear photographic evidence available to the public."
What images do you have in mind, please?
I didn't mention the Gulf War.
@@preludeh22a57
th-cam.com/video/SHBNO7exM5U/w-d-xo.htmlsi=OT62FNRe0YlI4uEc
@@atcn3GC 🤣🤣🤣 thanks!
Nice try
Be careful how you brand Americans
What do you mean? Did I do anything wrong?
@ normal I do not reply but I have a lot of respect for you there are a lot of internet nuts out their but also many solid individuals American and other that a listening and not making stupid remarks it’s always bad to categorize by a limited sample
The Long March of Millenium7.... (Get well) .
:)
american cope goes crazy
Well you are actually seeing the non-american creator cope. He is saying that the french have secret weapons but not the americans. That blurry triangle pics of the f-117 means that it wasn't a secret. And the SU-57 felon is a masterpiece. The dude has some serious biases and that is preventing him from speaking from grounded reality and instead makes wild nonsense claims like france has secret weapons but the US doesn't when the US spends way way more... those aren't rooted in reality or logic. This dude is slowly losing it because his internal fantasy doesn't align with reality.
F-117A was a secret weapon for quite some time.
*program
I was wondering if anybody would bring that up. It was in service before it was revealed to the public.
It was. For 10 years, flying covert every night.
Same with SeaShadow
Same with Stealth Black Hawk.
Wrong suspicions about way before i mean look what inspired Tom Clancy's f19 in Red storm rising
If he knew some stuff the soviets knew for sure atleast a bit about it
@@atcn3GC Stealth black hawk is just a modified Blackhawk so not so secret
I worked on a secret weapon a while ago. It's weird because it was announced in the news and there have been stories since but everyone ignores it. It has no deterrent value so I guess it's fine that nobody "sees" it (well you see it but you don't know what you're looking at).
If it was announced can you give us an idea?
@@millennium7shorts926 I can send you an email.
@@millennium7shorts926 I've sent you an email.
@@millennium7shorts926 I've sent you an email.
get a dog if you have to go walking. it makes it heaps better
He has Otis
I am more a parrot person.
@@millennium7shorts926 hmm.. a parrot on your shoulder might suit you.. would certainly look interesting on camera..🤪
@@millennium7shorts926oh. Me too!
It's my bandit on a profile picture 🥰
@@millennium7shorts926 i reckon walking a parrot might get the heart rate above target beats per minute. but seriously dogs do make walking better. i ended up with greyhounds chasing hares, finding out why they call it a dogfigt.
ENIGMA message: _'Nobody expects the Kriegsmarine_ , raiding the Atlantic !!!'
By the way, submarines can strike in much less than 90 minutes - in fact, less than 15 minutes in the case of Washington DC.
Unlike the bomber, 'the submarine always gets through' - even if it were only once.
US NAVY: 'There are friendly UFOs in our exercise areas !!!'
('Time for a song')
th-cam.com/video/enazOqN8K0o/w-d-xo.htmlsi=BX0W_6YXN9GtcMDa&t=2007
In the end, an accomplished walk.
This creator is saying that the french have secret weapons but not the americans. That blurry triangle pics of the f-117 means that it wasn't a secret. And the SU-57 felon is a masterpiece. The dude has some serious biases and that is preventing him from speaking from grounded reality and instead makes wild nonsense claims like france has secret weapons but the US doesn't when the US spends way way more... those aren't rooted in reality or logic. This dude is slowly losing it because his internal fantasy doesn't align with reality.
Both of you need to get over what you wish was true and deal with what is true.
@@thomgizziz
You need to get over Yourself.
Using the word 'dude' equals to outright terrorism.
I am happy to be called "dude", no worries😜
@@millennium7shorts926
It's NAFO code.
Once they realize that _everything_ they were told was a set up, they will lash out unto our loved ones.
It is who they are - hence fate had brought them into their position.
@@thomgizziz You're not used to hearing the truth, are you?