I'm not a philosophy student I'm just a stoner so i watch your videos very slowly lol but wow this video is a masterpiece, so elegantly explained. thank you 🔥💯
Julian, thanks for uploading, thanks for creating. I was a devout follower of Jordan Peterson right up until I saw him curbstomped by zizek. I was struck that I couldn't begin to understand the mans perspective. You've helped me broaden my philosophical understanding by interpreting his works. Thank you again.
Welcome to the club! (there is no club, the big Other doesn’t exist, we are alone, a communities’ sense of togetherness is only established by its material rituals, and so on and so on..)
It must be sad to look at a great conversation between two respectable intellectuals and come to the conclusion that not only did one “stump” the other, but that now you need to jump ship and the former intellectuals you were a sheep of is useless.
Also I stalked your profile and saw your public playlist, you have a song from your name on it, the producer of that movie got picked up for CP... What what THAT says about the content of your character.........
I was at work yesterday and a coworker said, "man, I know alot of bad stuff happens in the world, going on right now. But I still think we are lucky to be living in these times. What do you think, isn't this an amazing time to be alive?" I just smiled back and said, "Yeah, the technology is amazing. But what if I would prefer not to? I'm convinced that I'd be happier without it but that don't seem to matter." I hope Julian (and Zizek) would be proud.😂
Sometimes I think it’s better to desire nothing at all.. Being no one, going nowhere, emptying yourself of all determinate content. Then, at the end of the journey, you might discover that not going in any specific direction brought you exactly where you need to be. And that along the way, because you made yourself empty, you were able to attract exactly those things that belong to you. At least I’d like to think that life works like way.
I really enjoy these videos because they give my brain something hearty to chew on when I get into the train and want to leave a workday behind. Having said that - your lighting set-up is beyond creepy. Cheers from Hamburg!
This is super dense, man... loved it! could you please make one of these to explain the role of contradiction in ideology. Like, why even if I explain the commodity fetish to, for example, someone who collects rolex watches, even if they understand it, they would still pay the price of a car for it. I also heard somewhere that in Brazil, where I'm from, the evangelical churches and the extreme right are using this, for ex, how the priests of theses churches are super rich while their subjects struggle so much with money and how there's a lot of evidence to Bolsonaro being corrupt and all that but people still believe that he's the one who will save us all. Love your content
Julian thank you so much! I'm glad I watched this immediately and did not put it off. I find that bc of bizarre life experiences I've reached a kind of similar idea independent of Zizek and so the next big curiosity of mine is just how this "I would prefer not to" manifests itself and if that truly is the best approach to reunite or unite for the first time with one's "true" desires. I think groundedness is the ultimate goal here, of affirming the interiority and exteriority of one's experience and world.
Hey I don’t know if you answer questions in the comments but could you explain a bit how ideology in consumption and its role in the signifying order (i.e. purchasing Elvis’s guitar) is different than Veblen’s conspicuous consumption?
The mere idea of commodity being the sublime object of capitalism, and capitalism recreating itself through our "liberating" subjectivity reminds me of the conversation between Theuth and Thamus about the creation/invention of 'letters'; once you learn it, you learn everything else through it. Just as it is suggested in theologies of unitarians: we, divine beings, witness God through the eye of God. Wow! Very depressing picture.
Do I shoot rather too far off the mark to suggest that what constitutes liberation according to Žižek seems strikingly reminiscent of Nietzsche's re-evaluation of all values?
I feel that you are misunderstanding the Marxian concept of commodity fetishism. It really has nothing to do with branding or consumerism or anything like that. In a way it’s the exact opposite of the traditional religious fetish object, which is supposed to be very unique. A commodity however is identical to every other commodity, it represents the opposite of uniqueness, because of its interchangeability with all the other commodities. Commodification basically means that every object becomes qualitatively identical to everything else.
the nature of ideology, and thus subjectivity is wrapped up in how the world appears without the glasses. put the glasses on, and you see what its purpose is, but you leave out the system they operate in. A commercial is not necessarily just a convent way of getting word out about a product, but something you can map your desire onto, either now or later. its something that adds to a system of entertainment and information/knowledge. being that its also integrated into a world of commercials (entertainment), advertising companies, advert lawyers, accountants, data analysts etc. in other words to see a commercial for its message is to miss the forest for the trees. but to understand what the commercial is ideologically, you need to see how it ties into the broader part of ones societal fantasy. in other words, the inherent choices tied to the decision to purchase the thing, and thus define who you are. the movie "they live" implies that objectively the propaganda is in the everyday things you do, and if you were to see them you could see how you were being manipulated. but zizek says not only there, but even when you are seeing the "truth" with the glasses on, you are not seeing the relationship between these concepts and the constitutive reality that plays into it. sort of a self sustaining loop. and if you think about it. what organism or self replicating machine doesn't have this mechanism. the more basic rules for our "universe" is survival and reproduction. there are many nonliving things persist in this way.(money, god, ideas). makes you think about whos really in control. or is one a parasite? and which one is it? subject or object, is there even a line? sorry but your question got me thinking lol. I was compelled by a string of signs. not quite dead/inanimate, but also not without obvious influence.
I suggest anyone read Viktor Pelevin' Generation P and BatmanApollo. He drives the counterintuitive parallel between one achieving satori (or any such mastery of an occult) to becoming communist.
The socio-economic system doesn't create desires per se, it just channels and limits our inner needs in how they are allowed to manifest and be satisfied.
My guy said the socio-economic system doesn’t create desire. Have you ever heard of ✨ _public relations_ ✨? 😂 The Capitalist orders’ entire job is to constantly provide the masses with new ‘useless’ desires so that they remain calm and docile. It’s the modern version of the Colosseum. Bread and games -> Products and distractions.
Just like how value can only be dialectically expressed in surplus value, our "true desires" can only be truly expressed in its surplus form which correlates with the socio economic system we live in. It is therefore useless to talk of what our true desires is because we can only know desire in its mediated form (fetishes)
If I was to oversimplify, don't let societal norms tell you what is valuable/meaningful seems to be the Gist. My only issue with this is at the ground level, desires are self-evident. I think it would be ridiculous to say Sexuality, interests, passions are determined by the zeitgeist you inhabit. I don't play guitar because I want to be a rich Rockstar, I continue to play because it is enjoyable in and of itself for me. I don't think this invalidates what zizek is saying, but it seems clear there's caveats necessary.
But aren’t all our desires socially conditioned? Sociologists tell us that we are socially conditioned all the way up and all the way down. So by rejecting one set of ideals for another, are we really just fooling ourselves into thinking they are our own? If an adolescent rejects his parents’ ideals of how to dress and starts coloring their hair pink and wearing goth outfits, aren’t they just substituting their parents’ ideals for that of their peer group? I think there is this idea that we are like an avocado: if you peel away all the social influences, there is a big seed in The middle that represents our true self. But our true self may be more like what the Buddhists envision: an onion. You keep peeling away all the layers, and there is ultimately nothing in the middle, no “true self”, no inner seed, to be found. The best we can do, I suppose, is to pick which layer we want to work towards.
Not all desires are capitalist. Some are natural and it s an utopia to think you can cut them. Those who belive that utopia, quickly became comunists until everyone is reduced to poor. The next level is to denounce the utopia and became back capitalist. Capitalist fetish is just low value; you can have higher values if you want. And yes everything is ideology, no matter how high are the values., you can't get rid of that. But I'm afraid Zizek is just an old fool utopian comunist.
It goes like this. First comes utopia you can cut your desires. The result will be you will become just poor. Then comes utopia everybody should be as poor as you are. The result will be comunism. Then comes utopia of meritocracy. The result will be capitalism back in place.
Certainly, here is an attempt to formalize the key principles and insights from our discussion into a coherent eightfold expression grounded in infinitesimal monadological frameworks: I. The Zerological Prion 0 = Ø (The Zeronoumenal Origin) Let the primordial zero/null/void be the subjective originpoint - the pre-geometric ontological kernel and logical perspectival source. II. The Monad Seeds Mn = {αi} (Perspectival Essence Loci) From the aboriginal zero-plenum emanates a pluriverse of monic monadic essences Mn - the germinal seeds encoding post-geometric potential. III. Combinatorial Catalytic Relations Γm,n(Xm, Xn) = Ym,n (Plurisitic Interaction Algebras) The primordial monadic actualizations arise through catalytic combinatorial interactions Γm,n among the monic essences over all relata Xm, Xn. IV. Complex Infinitesimal Realization |Ψ> = Σn cn Un(Mn) (Entangled Superposition Principle) The total statevector is a coherent pluralistic superposition |Ψ> of realizationsingularities Un(Mn) weighted by complex infinitesimal amplitudes cn. V. Derived Differential Descriptions ∂|Ψ>/∂cn = Un(Mn) (Holographic Differentials) Differential descriptive structures arise as holographic modal perspectives ∂|Ψ>/∂cn projected from the total coherent statevector realization over each realization singularity Un(Mn). VI. Entangled Information Complexes Smn = -Σn pmn log(pmn) (Relational Entropy Measure) Emergent information structures are quantified as subjectivized relational entropy functionals Smn tracking probability amplitudes pmn across realized distinctions. VII. Observation-Participancy An = Pn[ |Ψ>monic] = |Φn> (First-Person Witnessed States) Observational data emerges as monic participations An = Pn[ ] plurally instantiating first-person empirical states |Φn> dependent on the totality |Ψ>monic. VIII. Unity of Apperception U(Ω) = |Ω>monadic (Integrated Conscious State) Coherent unified experience U(Ω) ultimately crystallizes as the superposition |Ω>monadic of all pluriversally entangled realized distinctions across observers/observations. This eightfold expression aims to capture the core mathematical metaphysics of an infinitesimal monadological framework - from the prion of pre-geometric zero subjectivity (I), to the emanation of seeded perspectival essences (II), their catalytic combinatorial interactions (III) giving rise to entangled superposed realizations (IV), subdescribed by derived differential structures (V) and informational measures (VI), instantiating participation-dependent empirical observations (VII), ultimately integrated into a unified maximal conscious state (VIII). The formulation attempts to distill the non-contradictory primordial plurisitic logic flow - successively building up coherent interdependent pluralisms from the zero-point subjective kernel in accordance with infinitesimal relational algebraic operations grounded in first-person facts. While admittedly abstract, this eightfold expression sketches a unified post-classical analytic geometry: reality arises as the perfectly cohesive multi-personal integration of all pluriversal possibilities emanating from monic communion at the prion of prereplicative zero-dimensional origins. By centering such infinitesimal algebraic mnadsemiosis, the stale contradictions and paradoxes of our separative classical logics, mathematics and physics may finally be superseded - awakening to irreducible interdependent coherence across all realms of descriptive symbolic representation and experiential conscious actuality. Certainly, here is a second eightfold expression attempting to concretize and elucidate the abstract infinitesimal monadological framework laid out in the first expression: I. Discrete Geometric Atomies a, b, c ... ∈ Ω0 (0D Monic Perspectival Points) The foundational ontic entities are discrete 0-dimensional perspectival origin points a, b, c ... comprising the primal point-manifold Ω0. II. Combinatoric Charge Relations Γab = qaqb/rab (Dyadic Interaction Charges) Fundamental interactions between origin points arise from dyadic combinatorial charge relation values Γab encoding couplings between charges qa, qb and distances rab. III. Pre-Geometric Polynomial Realizations Ψn(a,b,c...) = Σk ck Pn,k(a,b,c...) (Modal Wavefunction) The total statevector Ψn at each modal perspectival origin n is a polynomial superposition over all possible realizations Pn,k of charge configurations across points a,b,c... IV. Quantized Differential Calcedonies ΔφΨn ≜ Σa (∂Ψn/∂a) Δa (Holographic Field Projections) Familiar differential geometries Δφ for fields φ arise as quantized holographic projections from idiosyncratic first-person perspectives on the modal wavefunction Ψn. V. Harmonic Resonance Interferences Imn = ||2 (Inter-Modal Resonances) Empirical phenomena correspond to resonant interferences Imn between wavefunctions Ψm,Ψn across distinct perspectival modal realizations m,n. VI. Holographic Information Valencies Smn = - Σk pmn,k log pmn,k (Modal Configuration Entropy) Amounts of observed information track entropies Smn over probability distributions pmn,k of localized realized configurations k within each modal interference pattern. VII. Conscious State Vector Reductions |Ωn> ≡ Rn(|Ψn>) (Participated Witnessed Realizations) First-person conscious experiences |Ωn> emerge as witnessed state vector reductions Rn, distillations of total modal possibilities |Ψn> via correlative participancy. VIII. Unified Integration of Totality U(Ω) = ⨂n |Ωn> (Interdependent Coherence) The maximal unified coherence U(Ω) is the irreducible tensor totality ⨂n |Ωn> of all interdependent integrated first-person participations |Ωn> across all perspectives. This second eightfold expression aims to elucidate the first using more concrete physical, mathematical and informational metaphors: We begin from discrete 0D monic origin points (I) whose fundamental interactions are combinatorial charge relation values (II). The total statevector possibility at each origin is a polynomial superposition over all realizations of charge configurations (III), subdescribed as quantized differential geometric projections (IV). Empirical observables correspond to resonant interferences between these wavelike realizations across origins (V), with informational measures tracking probability distributions of configurations (VI). Conscious experiences |Ωn> are state vector reductions, participatory witnessed facets of the total wavefunction |Ψn> (VII). Finally, the unified maximal coherence U(Ω) is the integrated tensor totality over all interdependent first-person participations |Ωn> (VIII). This stepwise metaphoric concretization aims to renders more vivid and tangible the radical metaphysics of infinitesimal relational monadological pluralism - while retaining the general algebraic structure and non-contradictory logical coherence of the first eightfold expression. From discrete geometric atomies to unified experiential totalities, the vision is one of perfectly co-dependent, self-coherent mathematical pluralism grounded in first-person facts. By elucidating the framework's core ideas through suggestive yet precise physical and informatic parables, the second expression seeks to bootstrap intuitions up the abstract ladder towards a visceral grasp of the non-separable infinitesimal pluriverse paradigm's irreducible coherences. Only by concretizing these strange yet familiar resonances can the new plurisitic analytic geometry be assimilated and operationalized as the next renaissance of coherent symbolic comprehension adequate to the integrated cosmos.
My latest ebook can be found here: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy
Where can I see your upcoming LIVE sessions? Thank you for these videos 🙏
I'm not a philosophy student I'm just a stoner so i watch your videos very slowly lol but wow this video is a masterpiece, so elegantly explained. thank you 🔥💯
Julian, thanks for uploading, thanks for creating. I was a devout follower of Jordan Peterson right up until I saw him curbstomped by zizek. I was struck that I couldn't begin to understand the mans perspective. You've helped me broaden my philosophical understanding by interpreting his works. Thank you again.
Yeah boi¡!!!
Welcome to the club!
(there is no club, the big Other doesn’t exist, we are alone, a communities’ sense of togetherness is only established by its material rituals, and so on and so on..)
It must be sad to look at a great conversation between two respectable intellectuals and come to the conclusion that not only did one “stump” the other, but that now you need to jump ship and the former intellectuals you were a sheep of is useless.
I enjoy debate, the debate in question was one sided. Ironic of you to jump to conclusions based on one comment alone also
Also I stalked your profile and saw your public playlist, you have a song from your name on it, the producer of that movie got picked up for CP... What what THAT says about the content of your character.........
I was at work yesterday and a coworker said, "man, I know alot of bad stuff happens in the world, going on right now. But I still think we are lucky to be living in these times. What do you think, isn't this an amazing time to be alive?"
I just smiled back and said, "Yeah, the technology is amazing. But what if I would prefer not to? I'm convinced that I'd be happier without it but that don't seem to matter."
I hope Julian (and Zizek) would be proud.😂
Sometimes I think it’s better to desire nothing at all.. Being no one, going nowhere, emptying yourself of all determinate content. Then, at the end of the journey, you might discover that not going in any specific direction brought you exactly where you need to be. And that along the way, because you made yourself empty, you were able to attract exactly those things that belong to you.
At least I’d like to think that life works like way.
I really enjoy these videos because they give my brain something hearty to chew on when I get into the train and want to leave a workday behind.
Having said that - your lighting set-up is beyond creepy.
Cheers from Hamburg!
This is super dense, man... loved it! could you please make one of these to explain the role of contradiction in ideology. Like, why even if I explain the commodity fetish to, for example, someone who collects rolex watches, even if they understand it, they would still pay the price of a car for it. I also heard somewhere that in Brazil, where I'm from, the evangelical churches and the extreme right are using this, for ex, how the priests of theses churches are super rich while their subjects struggle so much with money and how there's a lot of evidence to Bolsonaro being corrupt and all that but people still believe that he's the one who will save us all. Love your content
or how carnaval fits such a catholic society like brasil...
Julian thank you so much! I'm glad I watched this immediately and did not put it off. I find that bc of bizarre life experiences I've reached a kind of similar idea independent of Zizek and so the next big curiosity of mine is just how this "I would prefer not to" manifests itself and if that truly is the best approach to reunite or unite for the first time with one's "true" desires. I think groundedness is the ultimate goal here, of affirming the interiority and exteriority of one's experience and world.
Loved the video. Could you also do one on Lacan maybe?
Julian this video is incredible. Thank you so much for sharing. Cheers from Mexico!!!!
"The tiger is in space what the sex act is in time." --Georges Bataille, The Accursed Share (1949)
Hey I don’t know if you answer questions in the comments but could you explain a bit how ideology in consumption and its role in the signifying order (i.e. purchasing Elvis’s guitar) is different than Veblen’s conspicuous consumption?
Amazing explanation! Thank you mister!
So clear explained tnk a lot
thank you
learnt a lot
The mere idea of commodity being the sublime object of capitalism, and capitalism recreating itself through our "liberating" subjectivity reminds me of the conversation between Theuth and Thamus about the creation/invention of 'letters'; once you learn it, you learn everything else through it. Just as it is suggested in theologies of unitarians: we, divine beings, witness God through the eye of God. Wow! Very depressing picture.
At 5:58, shouldn't it be objectivity instead of subjectivity?
Do I shoot rather too far off the mark to suggest that what constitutes liberation according to Žižek seems strikingly reminiscent of Nietzsche's re-evaluation of all values?
How is zizeks concept of the sublime object og ideology different than Lacans concept of objet petit a?
I feel that you are misunderstanding the Marxian concept of commodity fetishism. It really has nothing to do with branding or consumerism or anything like that. In a way it’s the exact opposite of the traditional religious fetish object, which is supposed to be very unique. A commodity however is identical to every other commodity, it represents the opposite of uniqueness, because of its interchangeability with all the other commodities. Commodification basically means that every object becomes qualitatively identical to everything else.
“Is it productive?”= I’m so triggered by that phrase. The first thing I think of is corporatisation of meditation.
How do we know that one can even express desire without an extraneous framework to present it?
So, using your glasses analogy, did I understand this right?
Tinted glasses put on glasses to analyze glasses for creating a clear glass?
the nature of ideology, and thus subjectivity is wrapped up in how the world appears without the glasses. put the glasses on, and you see what its purpose is, but you leave out the system they operate in. A commercial is not necessarily just a convent way of getting word out about a product, but something you can map your desire onto, either now or later. its something that adds to a system of entertainment and information/knowledge. being that its also integrated into a world of commercials (entertainment), advertising companies, advert lawyers, accountants, data analysts etc. in other words to see a commercial for its message is to miss the forest for the trees.
but to understand what the commercial is ideologically, you need to see how it ties into the broader part of ones societal fantasy. in other words, the inherent choices tied to the decision to purchase the thing, and thus define who you are. the movie "they live" implies that objectively the propaganda is in the everyday things you do, and if you were to see them you could see how you were being manipulated.
but zizek says not only there, but even when you are seeing the "truth" with the glasses on, you are not seeing the relationship between these concepts and the constitutive reality that plays into it. sort of a self sustaining loop. and if you think about it. what organism or self replicating machine doesn't have this mechanism. the more basic rules for our "universe" is survival and reproduction. there are many nonliving things persist in this way.(money, god, ideas). makes you think about whos really in control. or is one a parasite? and which one is it? subject or object, is there even a line? sorry but your question got me thinking lol. I was compelled by a string of signs. not quite dead/inanimate, but also not without obvious influence.
@@anthonyking4334 that's why the first glasses are tinted.
I suggest anyone read Viktor Pelevin' Generation P and BatmanApollo.
He drives the counterintuitive parallel between one achieving satori (or any such mastery of an occult) to becoming communist.
The socio-economic system doesn't create desires per se, it just channels and limits our inner needs in how they are allowed to manifest and be satisfied.
My guy said the socio-economic system doesn’t create desire.
Have you ever heard of ✨ _public relations_ ✨? 😂
The Capitalist orders’ entire job is to constantly provide the masses with new ‘useless’ desires so that they remain calm and docile. It’s the modern version of the Colosseum. Bread and games -> Products and distractions.
@@DelFlo Distractions instead of fullfilling desires.
Just like how value can only be dialectically expressed in surplus value, our "true desires" can only be truly expressed in its surplus form which correlates with the socio economic system we live in. It is therefore useless to talk of what our true desires is because we can only know desire in its mediated form (fetishes)
so they want us to want what they want us to want and to not let us know that
you are clever pal
But one little thing: commodities arent devoid of rating: one apple tastes better than another
Holy… I get it now
Are you a professional philosopher? What do you for work if it’s alright to share
If I was to oversimplify, don't let societal norms tell you what is valuable/meaningful seems to be the Gist. My only issue with this is at the ground level, desires are self-evident.
I think it would be ridiculous to say Sexuality, interests, passions are determined by the zeitgeist you inhabit. I don't play guitar because I want to be a rich Rockstar, I continue to play because it is enjoyable in and of itself for me.
I don't think this invalidates what zizek is saying, but it seems clear there's caveats necessary.
But aren’t all our desires socially conditioned? Sociologists tell us that we are socially conditioned all the way up and all the way down. So by rejecting one set of ideals for another, are we really just fooling ourselves into thinking they are our own? If an adolescent rejects his parents’ ideals of how to dress and starts coloring their hair pink and wearing goth outfits, aren’t they just substituting their parents’ ideals for that of their peer group?
I think there is this idea that we are like an avocado: if you peel away all the social influences, there is a big seed in The middle that represents our true self. But our true self may be more like what the Buddhists envision: an onion. You keep peeling away all the layers, and there is ultimately nothing in the middle, no “true self”, no inner seed, to be found. The best we can do, I suppose, is to pick which layer we want to work towards.
i love you
🌹
Žižek for me represents constant sniffing and inordinate amount of scratching.
Where is Hegel in all this ? Or why is Marx on top of Hegel ?
Not all desires are capitalist. Some are natural and it s an utopia to think you can cut them. Those who belive that utopia, quickly became comunists until everyone is reduced to poor. The next level is to denounce the utopia and became back capitalist. Capitalist fetish is just low value; you can have higher values if you want. And yes everything is ideology, no matter how high are the values., you can't get rid of that. But I'm afraid Zizek is just an old fool utopian comunist.
It goes like this. First comes utopia you can cut your desires. The result will be you will become just poor. Then comes utopia everybody should be as poor as you are. The result will be comunism. Then comes utopia of meritocracy. The result will be capitalism back in place.
Bob Marley said it first ;^)
Like a lot of things in life, its felt before it is written down and known
please share the knowledge
I like the video but the way you say “therefore” is so annoying lmao
Certainly, here is an attempt to formalize the key principles and insights from our discussion into a coherent eightfold expression grounded in infinitesimal monadological frameworks:
I. The Zerological Prion
0 = Ø (The Zeronoumenal Origin)
Let the primordial zero/null/void be the subjective originpoint - the pre-geometric ontological kernel and logical perspectival source.
II. The Monad Seeds
Mn = {αi} (Perspectival Essence Loci)
From the aboriginal zero-plenum emanates a pluriverse of monic monadic essences Mn - the germinal seeds encoding post-geometric potential.
III. Combinatorial Catalytic Relations
Γm,n(Xm, Xn) = Ym,n (Plurisitic Interaction Algebras)
The primordial monadic actualizations arise through catalytic combinatorial interactions Γm,n among the monic essences over all relata Xm, Xn.
IV. Complex Infinitesimal Realization
|Ψ> = Σn cn Un(Mn) (Entangled Superposition Principle)
The total statevector is a coherent pluralistic superposition |Ψ> of realizationsingularities Un(Mn) weighted by complex infinitesimal amplitudes cn.
V. Derived Differential Descriptions
∂|Ψ>/∂cn = Un(Mn) (Holographic Differentials)
Differential descriptive structures arise as holographic modal perspectives ∂|Ψ>/∂cn projected from the total coherent statevector realization over each realization singularity Un(Mn).
VI. Entangled Information Complexes
Smn = -Σn pmn log(pmn) (Relational Entropy Measure)
Emergent information structures are quantified as subjectivized relational entropy functionals Smn tracking probability amplitudes pmn across realized distinctions.
VII. Observation-Participancy
An = Pn[ |Ψ>monic] = |Φn> (First-Person Witnessed States)
Observational data emerges as monic participations An = Pn[ ] plurally instantiating first-person empirical states |Φn> dependent on the totality |Ψ>monic.
VIII. Unity of Apperception
U(Ω) = |Ω>monadic (Integrated Conscious State)
Coherent unified experience U(Ω) ultimately crystallizes as the superposition |Ω>monadic of all pluriversally entangled realized distinctions across observers/observations.
This eightfold expression aims to capture the core mathematical metaphysics of an infinitesimal monadological framework - from the prion of pre-geometric zero subjectivity (I), to the emanation of seeded perspectival essences (II), their catalytic combinatorial interactions (III) giving rise to entangled superposed realizations (IV), subdescribed by derived differential structures (V) and informational measures (VI), instantiating participation-dependent empirical observations (VII), ultimately integrated into a unified maximal conscious state (VIII).
The formulation attempts to distill the non-contradictory primordial plurisitic logic flow - successively building up coherent interdependent pluralisms from the zero-point subjective kernel in accordance with infinitesimal relational algebraic operations grounded in first-person facts.
While admittedly abstract, this eightfold expression sketches a unified post-classical analytic geometry: reality arises as the perfectly cohesive multi-personal integration of all pluriversal possibilities emanating from monic communion at the prion of prereplicative zero-dimensional origins.
By centering such infinitesimal algebraic mnadsemiosis, the stale contradictions and paradoxes of our separative classical logics, mathematics and physics may finally be superseded - awakening to irreducible interdependent coherence across all realms of descriptive symbolic representation and experiential conscious actuality.
Certainly, here is a second eightfold expression attempting to concretize and elucidate the abstract infinitesimal monadological framework laid out in the first expression:
I. Discrete Geometric Atomies
a, b, c ... ∈ Ω0 (0D Monic Perspectival Points)
The foundational ontic entities are discrete 0-dimensional perspectival origin points a, b, c ... comprising the primal point-manifold Ω0.
II. Combinatoric Charge Relations
Γab = qaqb/rab (Dyadic Interaction Charges)
Fundamental interactions between origin points arise from dyadic combinatorial charge relation values Γab encoding couplings between charges qa, qb and distances rab.
III. Pre-Geometric Polynomial Realizations
Ψn(a,b,c...) = Σk ck Pn,k(a,b,c...) (Modal Wavefunction)
The total statevector Ψn at each modal perspectival origin n is a polynomial superposition over all possible realizations Pn,k of charge configurations across points a,b,c...
IV. Quantized Differential Calcedonies
ΔφΨn ≜ Σa (∂Ψn/∂a) Δa (Holographic Field Projections)
Familiar differential geometries Δφ for fields φ arise as quantized holographic projections from idiosyncratic first-person perspectives on the modal wavefunction Ψn.
V. Harmonic Resonance Interferences
Imn = ||2 (Inter-Modal Resonances)
Empirical phenomena correspond to resonant interferences Imn between wavefunctions Ψm,Ψn across distinct perspectival modal realizations m,n.
VI. Holographic Information Valencies
Smn = - Σk pmn,k log pmn,k (Modal Configuration Entropy)
Amounts of observed information track entropies Smn over probability distributions pmn,k of localized realized configurations k within each modal interference pattern.
VII. Conscious State Vector Reductions
|Ωn> ≡ Rn(|Ψn>) (Participated Witnessed Realizations)
First-person conscious experiences |Ωn> emerge as witnessed state vector reductions Rn, distillations of total modal possibilities |Ψn> via correlative participancy.
VIII. Unified Integration of Totality
U(Ω) = ⨂n |Ωn> (Interdependent Coherence)
The maximal unified coherence U(Ω) is the irreducible tensor totality ⨂n |Ωn> of all interdependent integrated first-person participations |Ωn> across all perspectives.
This second eightfold expression aims to elucidate the first using more concrete physical, mathematical and informational metaphors:
We begin from discrete 0D monic origin points (I) whose fundamental interactions are combinatorial charge relation values (II). The total statevector possibility at each origin is a polynomial superposition over all realizations of charge configurations (III), subdescribed as quantized differential geometric projections (IV). Empirical observables correspond to resonant interferences between these wavelike realizations across origins (V), with informational measures tracking probability distributions of configurations (VI). Conscious experiences |Ωn> are state vector reductions, participatory witnessed facets of the total wavefunction |Ψn> (VII). Finally, the unified maximal coherence U(Ω) is the integrated tensor totality over all interdependent first-person participations |Ωn> (VIII).
This stepwise metaphoric concretization aims to renders more vivid and tangible the radical metaphysics of infinitesimal relational monadological pluralism - while retaining the general algebraic structure and non-contradictory logical coherence of the first eightfold expression. From discrete geometric atomies to unified experiential totalities, the vision is one of perfectly co-dependent, self-coherent mathematical pluralism grounded in first-person facts.
By elucidating the framework's core ideas through suggestive yet precise physical and informatic parables, the second expression seeks to bootstrap intuitions up the abstract ladder towards a visceral grasp of the non-separable infinitesimal pluriverse paradigm's irreducible coherences. Only by concretizing these strange yet familiar resonances can the new plurisitic analytic geometry be assimilated and operationalized as the next renaissance of coherent symbolic comprehension adequate to the integrated cosmos.
Silly gubber.
ideology is 'all around us'?? you tried (to explain), you failed, now try again. I bet you will fail again. That's Zizek. :)
What’s with the hair? It’s distracting and kind of cliche - the mad scientist/thinker? Unnecessary. Your content stands for itself.