No 3rd Aircraft Carrier for the Indian Navy! | हिंदी में
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
- This is a video on No 3rd Aircraft Carrier for the Indian Navy!
Website: thedefencematr...
Discord Link: / discord
Instagram Link: / defence_matrix
Twitter: / defencematrix1
Music : Background- Icelandic Arpeggios - DivKid (TH-cam Audio Library)
Intro Music : Skylines - Anno Domini Beats (TH-cam Audio Library)
*FAIR USE*
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
I think it's a good decision! We first need to focus on nuclear submarines and TEDF first ...then on aircraft carriers
Shame on BJPIGS 🖕🏻
Shame on Modi. You have money for every stupid things but not for the Defence of Country. Don't teach Navy what they want. It's SHAMEFUL that they FORCED Navy to go away from Aircraft Carrier. 😢
Right now we need to focus on how to use the existing equipment to the best of it’s ability in case of a full blown war. Every other projects are atleast 10-15 years away realistically.
TEDBF is gone now most likely, as there is no third carrier, so no need of more planes if we have sufficient rafale M.
@@p.npandey3371 the problem is we are not getting neither aircraft carrier not submarine. We are talking much and working less
No.
India first needs to focus on replacing outdated 1960s era aircraft and building up a coastal/border defence force with large numbers of advanced missiles. TEDBF is a dead duck - no sane country would initiate a new aircraft development for 100ish aircraft. The fact India is doing this highlights how little it understands about the enormity of developing a modern combat aircraft.
The future is one where China will arm Pakistan and its newly acquired allies either side on India with large numbers of modern weapons so that it can focus on the US and the West whilst using the regional countries to keep India in check.
Indian navy needs more distroyers, friget, Cruise.
Only US Navy operate cruisers.
We too had operated cruisers in past. @@Jaishivshakti05
Battle Cruisers are obsolete
@SumitMagar-067 thats the reason why US navy isn't building more cruisers and ticandaroga cruisers will be replaced by new upcoming DDG(X) destroyer.
Aircraft Carriers are like a Portable Airbase which can go anywhere and extends our reach....Its a Superppwer defining Thing....we should have 4 Carriers ✅️💯
Of course but right now our priority should be induct atleast 35 subs
whenever india's war happens it will confined at upper indian ocean , so why we need carries especially when we have lakshwadeep and andman the unsinkable aircraft carries , but yes , after 20-25 years down the line we can have it
in modern warfare they are also big achievement for enemies and sitting ducks for hypersonic missiles
@@avinashbhargav exactly.
@avinashbhargav no, actually because for every new tech an new counter tech also arrives, and to counter hypersonic cruise missiles, aircraft carriers will have short range laser defence system and an aircraft carrier should have enough power to operate 3-4 laser defence system , which will be able to atleast destroy a dozen or more hypersonic missiles at once, but the reason why IN is going to hold more carriers , because they have an limited budget and also because we are lacking in no. Of surface vessels subs, but to say aircraft carriers are sitting ducks it's actually quite wrong.
Rajnath Singh: We will operate 5 Aircraft Carrier 🤡
Biggest bluff minister
No wonder indian military is in dire state
The funny part is nobody got bluffed, since nobody cares about India.
Budget is constrain because our economy is small as compared to our size and population! We have to develop the economy fast ! In the world of AI there will be many challenges in economy!
The government has to increase tax collection
By covering high income Farmers
And small businesses who evade tax
In most medium and small cities.
@mradu30singh, we have to double down on manufacturing , agricultural shift towards more valuable crops, and msmes .
It is sad.. for a country like India having the largest coastline along indian ocean ee must have atleast 3 ac multiple nuclear submarine and destroyers to takle the rising problems in indian ocean but unfortunately we couldn't have it for our current situation
Bhai tum ne video dekhi ya nahi?
@@RahuluddinGandhyyes..why?
We already have Andaman and Lakshadweep as 2 unsinkable carriers plus in Bay of Bengal and Arabian sea our Aircrafts can easily operate from land based Airbases .
India doesn't need AC.. India don't want to deploy AC to Europe, china etc.
@@mahanammajumder3877 bhai simply we will remain a regional power unlike China who will becme blue water navy ..
India should make an artificial island in bay of bengal and make it a huge naval base, so that after andaman we can have a second line before the mainline defence
By not building the 3rd aircraft carrier, we are limiting our capabilities of an airstrike. If we want to be a Global power, we need atleast 5 aircraft carriers with aircrafts stationed at its bay so that we have better striking capabilities.
Gone are tha days of aircraft carrier, one missile ( Chinese) from pakistan or bangladesh can vipe out billions. Better to make engines of all kind, ssn submarines and other deffensive assets. We are not going to africa or south America or solomon island to intimidate small countrys. Chine has failed in making carrier forces, ends up on making coastal cariiers which cannot operate.
@Rakesh4809 Do you think the navy is fool when they were demanding for additional aircraft carriers? Aircraft carriers have different purposes and you can carry an entire aircraft fleet and make your striking capabilities even more potent. It's a wrong decision. If today one aircraft carrier goes for repair, we will have only one aircraft carrier and considering we are surrounded by oceans on all sides, it doesn't make sense to not have more aircraft carriers.
Shame on BJPIGS 🖕🏻
Shame on Modi. You have money for every stupid things but not for the Defence of Country. Don't teach Navy what they want. It's SHAMEFUL that they FORCED Navy to go away from Aircraft Carrier. 😢
Pese dede 20 aircraft carrier bana denge. Aukat bhi honi chahiye itne ac operate karne ki
@@seaker9206 Tum log kyon comment karne aate ho bhai? Paise de de ? Yaha be thoda serious discussion ho raha hai. Chapri group nhi hai.
In another words, we want to spend money on freebies, we have no ambition of becoming a super power in next 100 years at least.
no it means make for subs lol
India's focus is on integrating the masses into the mainstream, not blindly pursuing superpower status. With a per capita income less than half the global average and a very low Human Development Index ranking, the government's priority should be improving quality of life. Defending itself and ensuring citizen well-being is key, not chasing superpower status.
@@unknown_5107 mostly defensive secure interests and all, not all a super power, frankly dont need to, powerful like CHINA is enough 17+trillion economy that's all
@@unknown_5107don't cry when china annexes Indian lands ok .Stay developing
@@unknown_5107agree with you but freebies are not the way to achieve human and economic development
Kis ne to kaha tha ki hum 6 aircraft carrier operate karenge 😂😂 meanwhile CSL shares
Mujhe humesha se Pata tha itne carriers hum operate kar hi nhi payenge
I was looking for this comment 😅😂 .
Mr Ninda Singh 🤣🤣
@@_Parmatma_dr Sharminda Singh
Woh 2050 ki baat kar rahe the
Great decision 👍 aircraft carriers has no use is actually war (unless war is very far from our mainland ) and becomes soft target for enemies
Shame on BJPIGS 🖕🏻
Shame on Modi. You have money for every stupid things but not for the Defence of Country. Don't teach Navy what they want. It's SHAMEFUL that they FORCED Navy to go away from Aircraft Carrier. 😢
future is in massed unmanned under water fleet, not useless targets like aircraft carriers
very good decision to not waste money
We need atleast 12 nuclear attack subs and 18 conventional subs for navy
Indian Navy planning 27 conventional and 6 nuclear attack ssn
@@srfsongs3041 dont need any SSKs. Just SSNs.
@parthsna ssk has own advantage
Finally good sense prevails. India has around 534 uninhabited islands and many of them can be converted to unsinkable aircraft carriers with very low cost and Indian Navy can fulfill it's dream . Can India afford to lose an aircraft carrier with all it's assets during conflict where one hyper sonic carrier killer missile can do it ? We have to build defence infrastructure first. We need more stealthy submarines with long range punch. Failed to understand why IN top brass always think status first. We can't go 6000 km with carrier battle group undetected and undamaged to delivery the punch.
exactly if at all needed we can build smaller heli carrier from which UAVs can be lauched for recon missions........without having a single nuclear attack submarines and having obsolete conventional submarines its foolish to dream of an aircraft carrier
This decision should not delay the R & D in this field. If we decide to build a modern aircraft later, we may find that we lack the vital technologies being developed all around the world.
Worst decision 😞
US, Russia, South Korea, France, Italy, Turkey, UK new aircraft carriers develop kar rahe hai.
For becoming a global power power we need a robust economy first. Then we require a carrier
I think it is a good choice. We don't need to project power beyond the IOR in any case
I mean EMALs jaisi technology par RnD toh krte rhe taaki jab future mai 3rd IAC banana ho toh ingredients ready ho.
Just acquire some land and make a Naval base on Lakshdweep like Andaman & Nicobar
What do you think ?
No need to worry ,Indian Navy should develop a Nuclear Capable Flat deck Aircraft carrier like US and France are only countries to operate them currently,so to replace INS Vikramaditya we have to replace it with big Aircraft Carriers
agree with 2 carrier force. But make CATOBAR version of an upgraded Vikrant and eventually replace existing Vikrant with it. Also, the 4 amphibious assault ships should also be of type 076 in scale with catobar configuration
1. The decision to prioritize subs and other naval assets over aircraft carries makes sense. The Indian navy is lacking in various capabilities, and hence, currently investing huge amounts into aircraft carriers won't make sense.
2. The reduction in the order size of TEDBF can be countered without major issues. IAF should buy 44 Rafales and join ORCA project and acquire around 4 squadrons or 80 ORCA. This will increase the order size to 167 and IAF can get access to ORCA at negligible costs.
The problem is not aircraft carrier
The problem is navy wants to be in attack mode not defensive mode I think so we should give want navy wants
What we need right now is to build more nuclear powered submarines, not aircraft.
this guyn was defending Aircraft carrier for 2 years and niw changed colours faster than hypersonic missile...nice bruhhh
Sir please make a video on future submarine plann, their weapon systems,how much technology gap we have in this.
No need to build super carries, build small ones like Japan has and work on a vertical takeoff fighter jet like F35 B
2:40 100% agree. India ko sabsa pahala apne navy jada sa jada nuclear submarine or havy distroyers add karna chahiya. Bad mai aircraft carrier add hoga. Kiyu ki aircraft carier ki security Mein hi of submarine or Destroyer chahiye.
Go for long range bombers Tu 160 etc equipped with long range anti ship missiles instead
Even as a basic defense enthusiast, i know that Nuclear Submarines offer much better punch for value than any Aircraft Carrier. Why our Establishment waste so much precious time in taking such decisions. Pehle in Babu logo ne MMRCA ko leke time kharab kiya, ab Aircraft Carrier ko leke ullu bana rahe hain.
Haan jab Anil Ambani ko rafale ka theka Dena tha toh sab tezi se ho Gaya aur jab MRFA ki baat aayi toh Babu log zimmedar hai. Wah andhbhakt wah.
@@sayeedakhtar8647 bhai tuje ambanis se dikkat kya hai tuje kya lagta hai congress kisi bhi industrialist ko jayada favor nahi karti thi?
Basically by the end of the decade there will neither be new SSN,s nor a 3rd aircraft carrier. Just arguing, do this do, that and ultimately do nothing.
INS Vishal was first requested by navy way back in 2010. It's remained on paper for 15 years. In 15 years China has almost built 4 aircraft carriers and another 3 or 4 Vikramaditya sized helicopter carriers. So they currently have 7 carriers and over 60 submarines. Not to forget an extremely potent large fleet of destroyers and frigates. Their Coast Guards is probably larger than our Navy. Sooner than later they will exert offensive positions in the Indian Ocean, currently only their Survey and other vessels mainly visit with frontline platforms maintaining a distance from India's exclusive economic zone. But the chinese will come for sure.
And we'll be caught napping. First' build the hype for a 3rd carrier and then like so many plateforms just give up. Forget SSN even conventional Diesel submarines which were to be 24 only 6 inducted.
Aur karo meeting meeting...... Bureaucracy and politics jindabad.
We are cursed man
First from Pakistan. You are the most unbiased commentator on indo-pak defence issues in India
Lol buddy you good? Unbiased and him?
@@darkace0387 I really don't understand. Nobody asked you to comment. Why do you even care? If you can't take things with a pinch of salt, might as well go away
@@darkace0387 ain't no way right? 😂
Unbiased? U mean Pakztnys eternal desire to delude themselves into thinking they some parity with India...
If U mean he indulges the eternal Pakztny desire to think there is some parity between India and Pakztn then he doesn't... Should go check out his vids of JF-17.
Ready for again 1000 years under invaders 😢. Everything negative is happening with us. Just like HD209 submarine case in 1990 we will again lost our expertise in aircraft carrier making by losing trained manpower in cochin shipyard.
Modi masterstroke
Tedbf now doesn’t make sense. Just buy Rafale m and put all the money and focus on amca. Why create a new but non stealth jet that will probably take 5 more years just for 87 units?
Okay. I mean this is disheartening. But then invest PROPERLY in other assets. Invest in different submarines, Landing ships, carrier based AWACS, unmanned assets, larger and more powerful destroyers, minesweepers etc.
Ok...... But instead go for 3-4 LHDs with F35 with vertical take of capabilities..... It can surey compensate for 3rd aircraft carrier.
Abe kaun sa mall phook ke comment karte ho. F35 toh tumhare tau ka hai na Jo mil jaega.
I don't understand if one goes for maintenance and repair work. We will only have one to defend our seas. And we want to project our selves are true blue water Navy. 3 would have been perfect
But we will need to be developing cartobar type aircraft carriers which will be our future option. Atleast make it a side project. Yes you are right that we need the ssbn's but still we need to have the r&d dept in place atleast
We need 3 carriers.. if it's not happening havey losses will face in future
Please tell me how ?.
@sanjayhiremath9297 because very soon PLA navy deployed a carrier in indian ocean.. it is directly threat to out coust line and Maritime borders.. 2 carriers ar not enough.. it we have 3rd then we will deployed it at near andaman islands.. it will stop PLA navy to entertain in indian ocean.
@predatorxgameing9232 bro to stop ACC the submarines are better options with hypersonic ballistic missiles. So no worries chinese are not stupid enough to deploy their ACC in indian ocean. Because they know that ACC will be destroyed for sure. Chinese is building ACC to showcase their might as a milatary power. Like hathi k daat dikhany k liye hote hai attack karne nai.
@@sanjayhiremath9297 Shame on BJPIGS 🖕🏻
Shame on Modi. You have money for every stupid things but not for the Defence of Country. Don't teach Navy what they want. It's SHAMEFUL that they FORCED Navy to go away from Aircraft Carrier. 😢
@@predatorxgameing9232andmaan air base with rafale m and su 30 mki can handle pla threat
Phle khte hai ki 5-6 aircraft carrier honge. Baad mein khte hai ki 2 hi thik hai.
The rise of drone warfare is another threat that aircraft carriers have to deal with in the near future. If a swarm of drones manage to slightly damages the flight deck, it will vastly hamper the flight operations. Surface to air missiles are too expensive to take out those drones and they will run out of missiles and lasers are not matured enough to be reliable
We should build the carriers even china is building a new one and we don't even have a helicopter carrier in the navy.
Our govt is acting like that of 1962
I think its a good decision as we already have 4 aircraft carrier [2 portable +lakhdweep and andaman islands whcih can be coverted into unsinkable aircraft carrier ] .
If possible we nned to increase our sub counts to more than 40 [including nuclear and all other types of subs].
And what about the the skill set and expertise we have gained through this journey of making the Vikrant? Problem is not AC or Submarine.... problem is the time we take for decision making...now they decided to go for Submarine, let's see how many years it takes to receive the first one ....
The biggest joke is making submarines
Cause most making time recorded by navy vessel in Indian navy are subs , very slow
If IAC 2 will be replacement for R33 then we should build a carrier that has nuclear propulsion and CATOBAR features as we have time
To operate Aircraft carrier we should include total cost of carries requires Advance planes, Missile system, Huge naval crew. 5-6 support fighter ship, AWACS and much bigger cost. compared to that a nuclear submarine can work as lone shark in deep sea and Sink a Aircraft carrier. having 2 carriers , We should invest much more in nuclear submarine.
Technology will change in the next decade, so I think there is a need for a drone carrier. We need to increase the R&D budget in drones.
We are fked up
Good job sir ❤❤
As usual we never think into future. Always a follower never a leader or pioneer in our actions or thinking.
For offensive you need more subs and destroyer not a sitting duck carriers l. Which is also white elephant 🐘 🤔
Good choice. Rather than a repeat order go for Subs now and later IN should go for a Catobar.
Then the work should be start on project 18 class destroyers and project 17b class frigates
The issue is that the budget can be increased. I agree it may be a good decision for the given budget, but the budget should be atleadt 2.5% if GDP we are in a precarious location we need to spend its a necessity.
It's better to utilise this time in designing a 65k-70k ton flat top nuclear powered Air Carrier.
You cannot substitute an aircraft carriers with subs
India have many island which is natural aircraft carriers so 140 tedbf is necessary on nicobar and lakshdweep
Since the number of TEDBF is now reduced, we should go for AMCA naval to better utilize our resources. J-35 would be operated by China and there would be one aircraft of theirs on our IOR.
Nuclear attack submarine .... there is not even an AIP enabled diesel one.
Then why did we build a 75,000 tonnage dry dock??
lets built heavy tonnage ship there...and learn quick building and modular building process.
What about the talks of procuring older US nuclear aircraft carriers?
It was all the news a couple of years ago and it just went cold.
Where is this idea right now?
Probably won't happen given our experience with the Russians
We can afford not having 3 aircraft carrier if we utilise lakshwadeep and andaman islands properly...the navy should be given seperate defensive and ofensive aircraft as per their experties stationed their.
Good move- hypersonic missiles have made aircraft carriers obsolete. What Navy should consider is refitting old aircraft carrier as a drone carrier, when they replace it. In fact, manned aircraft are also obsolete, other than as mother ships in a Manned Unmanned Teaming System. Just that the world is late in waking up to it.
Does it make sense to develop an intirley new aircraft from scratch when we are only going to produce 87 of them
Bro before saying something just pause and think for a moment, you really sound idiotic. Gain some knowledge before you speak
We need a marine variant twin engined fighter which can operate from Andamans, Lakshadweep, Seychelles and the carriers. 87 will definitely go upto 120 if not more.
We have to find a Experienced Partner or a Friendly Nation who can help us plan and Assess Defense requirements, which are critical to defend ourselves, in accordance with our country's Economical condition.
But rajnath Singh Said we gonna make 5 to 6 aircraft carrier in future
accd to me we don't need third aircraft carrier for next 6 to 7 years as we have two of them also one of base in Andaman can tackle east and one at Lakshadweep can tackle west .The main focus is to improve our submarine and frigates destroyer and also aircrafts .Modern frigates ,destroyers, submarines are need of an hour for our navy
Need of Drone & Helicopter Carrier ☝️
Russian supplied INS Vikramadity will be retired sooner than expected . Third A/C will be a replacement for it .
भाई जब हम दुनिया की तीसरी अर्थव्यवस्था बनने जा रहे हैं तो हम तीसरा एयरक्राफ्ट कैरियर क्यों नहीं बना रहे हैं और हम मुफ्त की अरे बढ़िया बांट रहे हैं इसके बारे में जरूर बताना
This video is a prime example of effect of Freebies 🥲🥲
To point ye h ki bas abhi aircraft carriers priority nhi h lekin baad m rhenge 🎉🎉
Rajnath singh toh kuchh din pahle 5 aircraft carriers ki baat kar rahe the. Gubbara foot gaya kya?
I got it that's why the Indian government told the navy to decrease the number of TEDBF from 100+ to only around 80
But if India is planning to operate only 2 aircraft carriers then the IAC 2 should be a nuclear powered Vikrant with the 190MW nuclear reactor and CATOBAR😅😅😅
I am pretty sure India is going to buy HMS prince of wales
After 24 torpedos and 12 brahmos fired SSN goes to naval base. But a nuclear powered super carrier that carries tedbf will fire brahmos air launched version then come back and reload next missile then flies, fires that missile this will repeat continuously. When stored missiles exhausted a Cargo plane can resupply missiles. Fighter jets can use air to air missiles to intercept incoming missiles. But a visakhapatnam class destroyer will be defence less after firing 32 intercepters. Subs and surface ships exhaust their offensive and defensive capabilities easily, aircraft carrier can relentlessly project power. If a aircraft carrier is Vulnerable considering all the subs and surrounding destroyers and frigates are there, then these ship's itself are vulnerable to any attacks. So no point in making any ship's.
Kuchh innovative karne ki zarurat hai. Half-carriers bana sakte hai jo ki drone+ heli carriers ban sakte hai.
Sensible decision.For the time being we need more submarines. Atleast 35 submarine are needed till 2030. But it's not possible now 😢.
Rajnath Singh ji ne toh shayad 6 ac ki baat ki thi
Aircraft Carrier and vulnerable what a joke bro forgot Aircraft carrier carries an entire air wing to protect along with air defense destroyer and ships
I think we need to secure our maritime borders that includes dominance in Indian Ocean. So submarines and destroyers with small missile boats will be effective. an aircraft carrier will not be that effective in this type of warfare.
itna budget chahiye, utna budget chahiye... pehle jitna milta hai utna to hi kharch kar lo
Why Indian Navy cancel for 3rd Aircraft Carrier because of funds ?
Ek tha minister jo 6 carriers ki naat karta tha 👀
Kadi ninda minister
maine khan sir se suna h ke defence budget ka 80,% salary or pencen m chali jati h to hm kya hi kar payge
Submarine bhi kaha le raha hai, 20 years delay chal raha usme bhi
Why not LHD and f35B
6 एयर क्राफ्ट्स बनाने के रक्षा मंत्री के बयान को सालो खूब प्रचारित किया गया,अब सब घुस गये
India has no enough fighter jets then what will be landed and taken off from these aircraft carriers?
India has 700 fighters what are you saying, meanwhile Pakistan has 300 only. Bhikaristanis should not talk about numbers, aukaat and money. And your double standards 🤡🤡 you are abusing india in comment but your Playlist is full of bollywood songs and Indian educators reel
India has 700 fighters way more than Pakistan so Pakistanis don't need to worry . By the way tere double standards dekhle india ko gaali de raha hai comment mai lekin apni Playlist bollywood songs aur indian educators se bhar Rakhi hai typical Pakistanis
Our country don't run on IMF loan 😂
@@chanakya5480 yes bro even imf director is Indian.
@@Worli19 that is the things is very painful for Pakistan 🤣
Get Catobar in the next aircraft carrier
Indian navy capital budget should be more than 1 lakh crore
Better to focus on LHD/LPD’s & FSS for the time being.
Itne aircraft hai nahi to carriers leke kya karenge. Need more submarine
Dropped aircraft plan and go with submarines do you think anything literally anything complete on time
A few months age our RM was saying we will have 6 AC , what happened to that statement? another jumla !!
today the Forbes for the first time dropped us from the list of the 10 most powerful countries. One of the criteria is having a strong military , I guess the worlds does not see us as strong anymore except a few in India who have been deluding ourselves.
All thanks to BJP
Tuta hua khwab hu may , khud se hi naaraz hu may 😢😢😢😢😢😢🤡🤡🤡
When our govt. supported more aircraft carrier you give reasoning to support govt stand and now when govt is restricting to two aircraft carrier, now you are supporting for two aircraft carrier. Sorry to say, I think you are not clear with your views.
2:42 Alfa defence wins 🎉