Alfred Hitchcock: The Difference Between Mystery & Suspense

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
  • Alfred Hitchcock explains the differences between mystery and suspense at an AFI Seminar in 1970.
    Subscribe to this channel for more exclusive videos from the AFI Archive: bit.ly/Subscrib...
    Follow AFI:
    / americanfilminstitute
    / americanfilm
    / americanfilminstitute
    www.afi.com

ความคิดเห็น • 113

  • @heatherferreira4225
    @heatherferreira4225 8 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    I learn more about film in 60 seconds of listening to Alfred Hitchcock than I learned my entire time at NYU film school. Not to knock the school, it was fantastic. But this man was the absolute cinematic genius of all time.

  • @lynnturman8157
    @lynnturman8157 10 ปีที่แล้ว +323

    Suspense is created by giving information to the audience. Mystery is created by withholding information from the audience.

    • @heatherferreira4225
      @heatherferreira4225 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      SPOT ON.

    • @edp3202
      @edp3202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I actually like both. I do like mysteries too.

    • @ASMRASCENDING
      @ASMRASCENDING 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yaaa

    • @corrinflakes9659
      @corrinflakes9659 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@edp3202 That’s why you mix them, withhold key details for mystery, give vital details for suspense.

    • @oliverford5367
      @oliverford5367 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So a mystery is like a whodunit. You're trying to figure out who the murderer is. Suspense is when you know who the murderer is and you are waiting to see who he'll kill

  • @rievans57
    @rievans57 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mystery is an intellectual process and suspense is an emotional one. Fascinating.

  • @GNoodle
    @GNoodle 14 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Both Mystery and Suspense when done properly can be an absolutely amazing experience.

  • @Mirrorgirl492
    @Mirrorgirl492 14 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    He says so much with so few words...brilliant

    • @Hritik9000
      @Hritik9000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How are you after 10 years?

  • @Sheesh123
    @Sheesh123 13 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Listening to Hitchcock speak, it makes me a film student and aspiring director/screenwriter realize just how much i have to learn.

    • @rockingtundra2830
      @rockingtundra2830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey! How are you doing with your progress towards Directing/Screenwriting one decade later? I hope it’s going in a good direction!

  • @tomatoherb
    @tomatoherb 14 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It's like he knows how much of a genius he is, and I ain't even mad.

  • @theviolinoob
    @theviolinoob 10 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    . "Mystery is an intellectual process, like in a whodunit. But suspense is essentially an emotional process".. :D

  • @apontutul
    @apontutul 6 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    9 mysterious people disliked this, which keeps me in suspense, why?

  • @Alectricify
    @Alectricify 13 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I find him mysterious... And yet watching him speak is just full of suspense.

  • @LeconsdAnalyse
    @LeconsdAnalyse 11 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    A brilliant man.

  • @GetToDaChoppa-k5r
    @GetToDaChoppa-k5r 14 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Good to know the differences, but you can mix mystery with suspense. This can make a story doubly exciting.

  • @landofthesilverpath5823
    @landofthesilverpath5823 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Greatest filmaker of all time. His films are timeless.

    • @rievans57
      @rievans57 ปีที่แล้ว

      If someone believes Hitchock to be the greatest filmmaker of all-time I can understand why.

  • @mrshadows738
    @mrshadows738 13 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i love alfred hitchcock :D most kids dont know who he is. my teachers freak out when i talk about him. they just tell me "your only 16 how do you know him." therefor i tell them "i dont know him, i know about him."

    • @n0on343
      @n0on343 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your 25

    • @mrshadows738
      @mrshadows738 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@n0on343 bruh

    • @n0on343
      @n0on343 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow a 25 year old!

  • @hjeriz
    @hjeriz 11 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    The "whodunit" that Hitchcock mention is the film "The Sabotage" (1936).

  • @pod9363
    @pod9363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Mystery is "what happened" and Suspense is "what's going to happen".

    • @pod9363
      @pod9363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is intrigue in what happened, but there is only anxiety in what's going to happen. The only time you feel anxiety is when it effects what's going to happen.
      Like in Mystic River. The suspense isn't in "who killed the boy", it's in what's gonna happen once they find out who killed him.

  • @pyrrho314
    @pyrrho314 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    one of the best philosophers of authorship ever, not to mention perhaps america's best filmaker (among another dozen artistic geniuses).

  • @lbrtvlldr
    @lbrtvlldr 12 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Great lesson. Always give priority to the heart over the brain. Mystery = a brain process. Suspense = a heart process.

    • @petrfrizen6078
      @petrfrizen6078 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Like in Japan's medical regulations, as far as I remember...

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's not what he said. He wasn't bashing mysteries. Jeesh.

  • @gunnerysgthartman6124
    @gunnerysgthartman6124 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A brilliant man

  • @madahad9
    @madahad9 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Probably a good example of his "suspense" would be (in my opinion one of his best films) Frenzy where we know who the killer is so there is no mysetery as to whom is guilty and who is innocent but the unfortunate series of events which befall the main character causes the light of suspicion to fall upon him. It has one of my favorite end scenes. It at first has a disturbing moment, an "oh, no" moment, and then a line that has just the slightest touch of humor but does not sabotage the moment.

  • @SalamiKing7
    @SalamiKing7 15 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gotta love Hitch!

  • @STONECOLD1987
    @STONECOLD1987 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Master of Suspense

  • @dondoyle8474
    @dondoyle8474 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WOW such a Genius

  • @rajendrabiswas
    @rajendrabiswas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Vertigo was mysterious

  • @PlayIt4MeAgainSam
    @PlayIt4MeAgainSam 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very wise man! Well many have knowledge, Hitchcock has wisdom.

  • @robonez
    @robonez 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great point from Hitchcock there!

  • @petrfrizen6078
    @petrfrizen6078 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clearly explained.

  • @MTFDarkEagle
    @MTFDarkEagle 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this guy is a genius!

  • @more_tezza
    @more_tezza 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow, totally agree with him!!!

  • @nexttimewelove51
    @nexttimewelove51 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alfred "Genius" Hitchcock

  • @coachfb18
    @coachfb18 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Man!

  • @GeorgeVreelandHill
    @GeorgeVreelandHill 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    He knew his stuff.
    No wonder why Hitchcock is the legend he is.
    George Vreeland Hill

  • @CYBERSURF88
    @CYBERSURF88 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hitchcock is my favorite. However, in this clip, H is stating the obvious. Simply put, "Mystery" is a noun. When applied to film, it is a catagory / genre of film. In a Mystery, there is a puzzle that must be solved. In contrast, "Suspense" is an adjective. It is an action word which evokes emotion. Holding your breath in anticipation is an act of Suspense. As I've earlier said, H's earliest films were his greatest. The suspense thrillers of the 30's. JAMAICA INN is one of the best.

  • @madahad9
    @madahad9 11 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The only hope for modern movies is to look back at it's history. What made movies great seems to be a thing of the past now. Today it is all just pandering to the audience instead of taking them on a ride that has an absurd predictable outcome. A good student of film will look to the very beginning of cinema to the silents. Stanley Kubrick stated that to make a silent is a great education. It is pure cinema--the image. Study the German expressionists. Europeans saw film as a true artform.

  • @Karaokuma
    @Karaokuma 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Case in point: Psycho.
    Essentially, it's a mystery because we aren't told who's committing the murders until the final ten minutes of the film. However, Hitchcock makes sure that the film isn't just a whodunnit because we get emotionally invested in Marion Crane's story and after she's murdered, we get emotionally invested in Norman and Lila and Sam's story. We're on the edge of our seats because WE know there's a psycho running around with a knife hacking people to bits, but the characters don't. The suspense is what fuels the film, not the curiosity of who's killing people.

  • @MindlessInvalid
    @MindlessInvalid 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @film23790 You're overthinking it. Suspense requires a person to connect with a film on an intuitive level. They have to enjoy a scenario enough to want to know more. Suspense is essentially wanting to know what happens next. Mystery on the other hand, is a process of trying to intellectualize the possible outcomes of a given scenario. Emotion and Thought are fundamentally different. Suspense and Mystery are the respective results of a informational vacuum in a work. Feeling and Thinking.

  • @EmperorsNewWardrobe
    @EmperorsNewWardrobe 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @cheeriosinabowl In a way, you're right, there is mystery in suspense, but it is possible to have no suspense in mystery. For instance, working out the 'w' questions of a scene (who, what, where, why etc) is not emotive alone, but when these directly effect the emotional stakes towards the character, that's when it become suspense. Hitch is distinguishing the two to cease the common confusion that mystery alone is as emotionally effective as suspense. I'd love to know what you think!

  • @shockingpinks
    @shockingpinks 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bomb ticking. He makes a great point...then loses it in the end when he says mystery results in curiosity which is an emotion. Suspense is created by set-ups. BOOM!

  • @Double-R-Nothing
    @Double-R-Nothing 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This genius explains why A Quiet Place is such a brilliant movie decades before it even existed.

  • @MrFacundo7
    @MrFacundo7 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Jtp101z I agree,he was the best,he is the best and he will be the best.He was a real artist and a genius.Alfred Hitchcock,We salute you!

  • @aoodi6
    @aoodi6 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Gramatik

  • @dwinklet
    @dwinklet 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hmmmm. I don't know about this answer here. HIs reply seemed a bit contradictory, though I think I understand the gist of what he's trying to say. I mean, one can't say that a mystery has no emotion, except the emotion of curiosity. And one can't say, I've never made a mystery, but I've made a whodunit, when he defines a mystery as a whodunit.

    • @petrfrizen6078
      @petrfrizen6078 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, mysteries are very emotional. But less informative compared with suspense.

  • @LIFEGUARD805
    @LIFEGUARD805 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Master if suspense, indeed! He also is the master of manipulating, soliciting emotions from the audience. Same as Steven Spielberg and his ability to manipulate the audiences emotions. Amazing guys!

  • @13Orcun
    @13Orcun 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @film23790 indeed David Lynch gives a very limited things you to not have any chance to think about possibilities. He only gives unconnected visuals to see. Then he said '' meaning depends on people ''. There is no any suspense and mystery.

  • @NotRegret
    @NotRegret 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    in video games suspender is nonexistent and the plot is designed to hold as many '5 second revalations' as possible. since the player is supposed to feel like he is a character the player is frustrated when he must knowingly guide his character into a trap and not act on his knowledge of the plot. surprises have more of an impact on the audience in game environment however because the player has an emotional investment in the playable character and doesn't want to see bad things happen to him

  • @breaksystembse
    @breaksystembse 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He's gotta a point about the differences, but I like to think mystery and suspense are the Ebony and Ivory of literature.

  • @deljefe
    @deljefe 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    what a fucking genius so much to learn here

  • @PlayIt4MeAgainSam
    @PlayIt4MeAgainSam 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd say: "To Catch a Thief" (1955)

  • @Stratword_
    @Stratword_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Curious to know what his 'whodunit' will is.

  • @jewellmiket
    @jewellmiket 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    I pay FULL TRIBUTE to HITCHCOCK and BERNARD HERRMANN with my movie, WE ALL DO DUMB THINGS (posted above). This is a suspense-filled little movie I made with these two names in mind when I set out to make it.

  • @cheeriosinabowl
    @cheeriosinabowl 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    To me, mystery and suspense go hand in hand.

  • @phaedrabacker2004
    @phaedrabacker2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A wonderful accent.

  • @johnpaulpierrot
    @johnpaulpierrot 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Which film is the 'whodunit' that he refers too?... I'm thinking maybe The Lodger?

  • @027220
    @027220 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mystery - Who done it?
    Suspense - Emotion.

  • @lassesolbu1360
    @lassesolbu1360 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think suspense and mystery are not so easily separated. For example, you can get a good deal of suspense going by having characters being in danger. Such as in Agatha Christies "And then there were none". It is a whodunit, but you also know the victims are together on an island with a mad killer, and that creates suspense (not merely an intellectual curiosity). Also suspense and mystery can be combined to great effect, such as Hitchcock himself did on numerous occations, such as n Psycho. We are curious to what is really going on in that old house (mystery), and we also know that 'mother' is hiding in the fruit cellar (suspense). Also I don't think suspense is "better" than mystery, just affecting us in different ways..

  • @madpeace1764
    @madpeace1764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THE YODA OF FILMMAKING...

  • @SerlingPictures
    @SerlingPictures 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @seth5220 ummm... did u mean north by northwest?

  • @smithhedgehog
    @smithhedgehog 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    In "the lady vanishes" dosen't the main character go missing; and therefore it's a mystery because we don't know where, why, or how she dissapeared...?

  • @goldenheaven110
    @goldenheaven110 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    00:24

  • @RB-mq6em
    @RB-mq6em 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mystery is about the past; suspense is about the future.

  • @gabrielferreira3552
    @gabrielferreira3552 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alfred Hitchcock was a great director, cristhopher nolan should wach this video to learn how to use suspense.

  • @silvpetros
    @silvpetros 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello there

  • @goldenheaven110
    @goldenheaven110 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:05

  • @BjornSvenson
    @BjornSvenson 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    which film does he consider his only "who done it?"

  • @DenkyManner
    @DenkyManner 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    His films often have mystery in them. Vertigo is ostensibly a mystery though he deliberately turns the mystery of the second woman into a suspense when she confesses the truth in a letter she never sends. I don't know if he was right to do that as the suspense didn't work for some reason. The power of Vertigo is from a deeper mysteriousness, a poetic, unconscious dream like disorientation rather a plain "whodunit".

  • @Deathriken
    @Deathriken 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @artformeandyou the creator of Slashers

  • @SharpDesign
    @SharpDesign 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Murder She Wrote- Mystery
    Columbo - Suspense

  • @ohiogremlin87
    @ohiogremlin87 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think strangers on a train

  • @jagdishacharya1438
    @jagdishacharya1438 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mystery# paper currency and Suspence# paperless currency. Cards.

  • @MaxxUS08
    @MaxxUS08 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im not completely sure which film he referred to as the 'Who dunnit". It has to be Under Capricorn, not his best at all.

  • @GregCoxTV
    @GregCoxTV 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Indeed, Hitch was a great filmmaker but don't forget to give credit to the screenwriters, without them there would be no great film.

  • @tobyfjm
    @tobyfjm 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    gramatik brought me here

  • @adelacarmen
    @adelacarmen 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    if he would live now .... i bet was the king of horror movies ..:P

  • @edp3202
    @edp3202 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love that Hitchcock found showing too much of women's body parts boring and offensive which is why his actresses always are pretty covered up and classy.

  • @houserulez2008
    @houserulez2008 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    hitchcock or kubrick?

    • @petrfrizen6078
      @petrfrizen6078 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leonardo da Vinci or Renoir?..

  • @IoEstasCedonta
    @IoEstasCedonta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The irony is, I'm wondering which film he considers his "whodunnit." Murder?

  • @gethsoftware
    @gethsoftware 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    the "horror" aka zombie movies, resident evil, are not really that scary. movies like Alien and games like slender are very suspensfull, sure alien has gore, like chest buster, but alien is so much more then that. lot of the deaths happen off screen. and slender is all about mystery and suspense. the tention grows and grows when you stalked by slender without any breaks.

  • @GOreelz
    @GOreelz 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    why wouldn't psycho be a "whodunit'? Doesn't the audience want to know who killed Janet Leigh's character?

  • @Andreasjacke1
    @Andreasjacke1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vielen Dank - wenn Du magst siehe meinen Vortrag über Hitchcock auf der Seite von meinem Kanal!!!

  • @pyrrho314
    @pyrrho314 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @pyrrho314 : yeah yeah, he was a brit... :) ANYONE CAN BE AMERICAN!
    fine, world's best... grrmamdmfmbmblb

  • @christianespinal1938
    @christianespinal1938 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    ttt

  • @oxymomo
    @oxymomo 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry, but "suspense" is a noun, too.

  • @oliverford5367
    @oliverford5367 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vanilla Sky is the worst example of too much mystery. You can't figure out what's a dream and what's real. After you've seen it you can argue about which bits were real, but that's a cerebral thing. It's not emotional.

  • @m420carbine4
    @m420carbine4 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    we are donating now on youtube? are you kidding me. how about we all donate to reinvest in america. but only if we can vote more than 4 years.

  • @cubanbach
    @cubanbach 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    not really, because we always know "who did it"...

  • @monsieurgolem3392
    @monsieurgolem3392 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hitchcock lies, lol, his presents series was nothing but mystery, which Im finding to be better than his movies.

  • @ofanzivnonestabilan
    @ofanzivnonestabilan 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    you couldn't be more wrong

    • @broc8095
      @broc8095 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Filip d I’d trust the word of Hitchcock more than the word of a Filip d

  • @goldenheaven110
    @goldenheaven110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:38