**PRE-ARRIVAL** Truck and Minivan Fully Involved after Crash, Lower Macungie, Pennsylvania - 1.22.24

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • On location of a crash with vehicle fire on Schantz Rd between Hamilton and Cetronia in Lower Macungie Twp. Crews arrived to a minivan vs truck with both vehicles fully involved. No injuries were reported Schantz Rd will be closed an extended area of time…

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @LakesRegionEmergencyPhoto
    @LakesRegionEmergencyPhoto 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Drone footage is on point as usual. Nice job!

  • @robbates5910
    @robbates5910 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hope Everyone Got Out Safely !

  • @novdt
    @novdt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    drone only footage disconnects one from the experience, you need the sound. thats what ears are for, excluding some situations which this is not.

    • @NVPMedia
      @NVPMedia  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We actually are going to be working on adding radio traffic to calls for those that don’t like the quietness however the recordings from this incident were very bad

  • @marymastromauro8164
    @marymastromauro8164 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What the heck is going on lately? Soany fires, even here in Queens, NY

  • @herberthallum2078
    @herberthallum2078 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks like they are having a very difficult time putting it out.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's because they used the wrong size hose...and the wrong tactics.

    • @hihfty
      @hihfty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ffjsb They're using class B foam which is generally only piped into 1 3/4 quarters discharges. Additionally class B is typically 5 gallons on board as more departments would prefer a bigger class A tank. You can see constant reignition of flammable liquids and crews carrying more class B foam buckets to the scene. Please tell me how they used wrong tactics.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hihfty First off, read the label on most any kind of foam, it's not effective under about 35 degrees. Also, foam isn't useful for 3 dimensional fires, ie where fuel is actively flowing or spilling. They also should've been using those lines together, not bouncing around all over the place like they're playing Whach A Mole. They should use dry chem for the fuel fire under the car, straight streams will never put out that fire, it will burn out for lack of fuel first.
      And BTW, the smallest on board foam tank I've ever seen is 20-25 gallons. And you can also pump both lines into a gated wye to one 21/2" line. But Pa. firefighters are among the lowest trained in the country, so I'm not surprised.

    • @hihfty
      @hihfty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ffjsbSo every ARFF unit in the entire world is completely useless in the winter? Idk what kind of foam you're accustom to but that statement is flat out wrong and it can be used in actively flowing fires all though high rates of applications are needed. Generally i agree with you on most videos but this one isnt that bad. Not enough dry chem on every truck in the city to even touch this fire.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hihfty Don't get mad at me, read the label on the product. It's NOT wrong on many types of foam, because that's what it says. And I don't know where you learned this, but foam DOES NOT WORK on three dimensional fire, ie: flowing and spilling fuel. The BASIC mechanism of how it works is to form a layer that denies oxygen to the fuel, and that CANNOT be done on spilling fuel.
      I only had a major in Fire Science.

  • @jimgriffin9924
    @jimgriffin9924 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Too much drone, not enough ground level footage

    • @RLTtizME
      @RLTtizME 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LOL...get your own camera.

  • @boatbound3300
    @boatbound3300 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a freakin mess

  • @andrewp7509
    @andrewp7509 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Silent drone coverage**

  • @littlehoneybumsdollnurse4298
    @littlehoneybumsdollnurse4298 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh my God! I hope the people were able to escape! 😞

    • @Dumielle3
      @Dumielle3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They did

  • @garygeorge9648
    @garygeorge9648 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about putting the ladder up and just using it instead of a hose. You could get a lot more water on it a lot quicker.

    • @brandonseyfried1251
      @brandonseyfried1251 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      With that much fire on arrival and no exposures, there's nothing to save, so you're just containing the incident. And, with vehicle fires, you still need hoselines to move around and get the hard-to-reach spots from different angles.

    • @stevenpivornik9982
      @stevenpivornik9982 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I understand what was trying to be asked about the aerial being set up above the scene and drowning it out. I had that same thought too. Just get the bucket over the fire, face the nozzle downward and open up. Still can have operating lines to go along with it. That's keeping it contained.@@brandonseyfried1251

  • @steveg5576
    @steveg5576 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    J.C.......!

  • @rexmayn3171
    @rexmayn3171 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know a lot about vehicles. In my estimation, both vehicles might be totaled.