Music Theory & Modular Synths // d'Voxx Télégraphe

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @OmriCohen-Music
    @OmriCohen-Music 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was super interesting and inspiring! It's hard to think sometimes about modular and music theory at the same time, but those guys make it sound so natural...

  • @cuba1956
    @cuba1956 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Incredible insights! Thank you so much for this interview.

  • @slaughtrhaus_377
    @slaughtrhaus_377 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for this awesome discussion.

  • @manslaughterinc.9135
    @manslaughterinc.9135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wish there was a modular music theory series i could binge.

  • @BrunoWiebelt
    @BrunoWiebelt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    one of the most interesting insights ... thank you very much for showing; so much craftsman

  • @chemicalBR0
    @chemicalBR0 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great interview Ben
    really enjoyed this one

  • @FelipeTellez
    @FelipeTellez 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very interesting, got me thinking about the creation of tension and release ala Western Classical which drives that sort of music, and how this genre takes those same concepts and applies them to texture....very, very cool

  • @johanwallmark9355
    @johanwallmark9355 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great stuff Ben!

  • @HarryFullerCT
    @HarryFullerCT 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was amazing. Thanks.

  • @apeirogonmusic
    @apeirogonmusic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder if anyone does like death metal bands ( or many other styles of music )
    Tuning in C for example
    And the other half step down to get a chunkier sound and no phase cancellation between the two musicians
    Cheers for all the great Info Ben
    Your a star 🙏🏻

  • @Wheel333
    @Wheel333 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was struggling learning scales for a composer. Weird Indian and Egyptian scales. He realised I was struggling and said to me just learn the notes you shouldn't play. Genius, it all clicked into place with a few coloured dots on the fretboard lol.

  • @bitegoatie
    @bitegoatie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why modes? Choose the right key for the modern scale you’re using and they’re unnecessary. They are anachronisms. Why people get taught theory this way baffles me.
    I mean, whatever works for you, but learning modes in the 21st century (or after the 12th century) is just wasted memorization. We’re just multiplying names to no purpose.

    • @paulborg9239
      @paulborg9239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      bitegoatie that’s just the way we work - if you do it another way, cool, it’s not the law 😌 We’re just answering the question. I personally don’t know a any other approach, and as a professional composer, this system has served me well over the years 👍🏻

    • @evilanorak
      @evilanorak 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I would have agreed with you up until I started watching Rick Beato and others discussing modal theory and I realised learning modes is just the tip of the iceberg. Such a great tool for chord progressions and key changes, although that's not something typically utilised by many electronic musicians. Hopefully more people will use these techniques in the future, trying to get your head round it does make my brain hurt a bit though.

    • @paulborg9239
      @paulborg9239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      evilanorak don’t over think it, just use your ears, sounds like you already do though 👍🏻

    • @bitegoatie
      @bitegoatie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ea - It doesn't help me at all with chord progressions or anything else. Modes are just more scales, renamed to Greek. Scales that exist in classical and contemporary theory, with fewer names to memorize, lower hurdles to understanding, and more flexibility of implementation. I've learned modes, heard explanations from people of how they help, and I find it's all just a question of how people learn. If you learned theory piecemeal from private teachers who themselves learned this way, you learn modes because that's what you were taught. If you learned theory in an organized, textbook-driven way from composers and conductors, it's hard to see why some musicians put themselves through the pain of absorbing this quasi-Greek relic of musical history.
      It seems like a person learning about the motion of planets and the moon and the sun by learning Ptolemy's explanations of their cycles rather than just learning modern astronomical explanations of the same thing. There's no wrong way to learn. As I said above (and I say again for Paul) whatever works for you is good, especially in music. It genuinely mystifies me, all the same, that so many people get taught to use modes - not as history but as a thing they supposedly need to know.
      There is no need to study modes. Better to study harmelodics or Indian classical or any number of other approaches - all of which can be expressed in any form of theory, but which at least bring with them different outlooks on music. The way people use modes, it's just obfuscated standard western theory. Better to keep theory simple, I think.
      But whatever - I just had a wave of astonishment when the theory video waded straight into modes. Had the title just been about how these guys work, I would not have commented. But I prompted a few replies, which helps Ben with the YT algorithm, so there you go.
      No harm intended. Certainly not to the guest duo - though maybe teachers who make kids learn modes are due a bit of a flogging.

    • @paulborg9239
      @paulborg9239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bitegoatie wow!