Ladies And Gentlemen! How Do You Feel? | NETWORK (1976) | Movie Reaction

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ค. 2024
  • First time watching and reacting to NETWORK (1976) movie.
    🤗 Thanks for tuning in! Leave a LIKE so our community can grow! 🤗
    SUBSCRIBE BY CLICKING HERE ⬇️
    / @henryellow
    👇 My Reactions to other Sidney Lumet Movies! 👇
    • Sidney Lumet
    Support me on Patreon! Full Reaction available (watch along with me~)
    / henryellow 👈
    ✨ Movie Reactions Playlist ✨
    • Movie Reacts
    Intro 0:00
    React 0:34
    Thoughts 29:21
    #moviereaction #moviereactions #moviereview #moviereviews #firsttimewatching #network #sidneylumet
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 52

  • @waynesimpson4081
    @waynesimpson4081 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Side note : the "Ecumenical Liberation Army" is a parody of the Symbionese Liberation Army who kidnapped Patty Hearst (heiress of the Hearst media empire) in 1974.

  • @jamesalexander5623
    @jamesalexander5623 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Look at the Release Date! This is the Most Prophetic Film of All Time!

  • @TTM9691
    @TTM9691 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great thumbnail, and I'm watching this right now! I've been very busy and far behind on your reactions, but I cannot let this one pass!!! You've been doing great stuff! Starting this now!

  • @zvimur
    @zvimur หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    0:59, Wow!! You're 3 for 3 for excellent movies featuring William Holden.
    Formerly of Stalag 17 and Sabrina.

  • @donkfail1
    @donkfail1 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Oh, YES! A favourite on a level of it's own. So excited to see what you think.
    Just had to say something before even watching your reaction.
    Midsummer greetings from Sweden!

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Awesome, I hope you enjoyed my reaction! 😊

  • @Dej24601
    @Dej24601 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The film that shot Faye Dunaway to superstardom is Bonnie and Clyde (1967.) Chinatown makes a reference/homage to that, and in this film she says a few lines that also refer (very subtly) to Bonnie and Clyde.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Awesome, I have that movie on my list 😉
      Not sure when I'll get to it, but I will 👍🏻

  • @perrymalcolm3802
    @perrymalcolm3802 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Paddy Chayefsky was a genius writer who knew exactly what he was doing. He’d been involved for a time with network television.
    He could see what had already been happening and how things were then going. For someone that clued-in, he could intuitively see the writing on the wall.
    “Vietnam” and all it included was the rift that led to many shifts n schisms depicted here, which have gone unaddressed at the root, and we have only degenerated as a country from there

  • @vincentsaia6545
    @vincentsaia6545 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a veteran newsman I'm sure he had many sources of information.

  • @vincentsaia6545
    @vincentsaia6545 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    William Holden, Peter Finch, Faye Dunaway, Beatrice Straight, and Ned Beatty all got Oscar nominations from this movie. Dunaway and Straight won Oscars and Finch won his posthumously, having died of a heart attack weeks before the ceremony.

  • @Scsibut
    @Scsibut หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great movie and great reaction

  • @juandesalgado
    @juandesalgado หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great choice of movie! Thanks for the reaction.

  • @TTM9691
    @TTM9691 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Henry, I wrote a big long comment that I accidentally deleted. All I can say is: fantastic commentary! I know you said that you thought you might not catch all the satire, but I can promise you that you got the movie 100%! Brilliant analysis, both during the film and afterwards. I agreed with every single thing you mentioned. You are completely correct: in 1976, it felt much more satirical than prophetic. It really has become true. The edit was great, this is one of my favorite commentaries you've ever done! THANK YOU!

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh no... It'll be safer to write it in your notes next time, then copy it to the comments 😂
      I'm happy to hear you enjoyed my video! 😊

  • @BigGator5
    @BigGator5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"
    Fun Fact: Theatrical movie debut of Stanley Grover, Arthur Burghardt, and Sasha Von Scherler.
    Casting Notes Fact: Robert Duvall and Faye Dunaway would also appear as husband-wife in The Handmaid's Tale (1990). Ned Beatty was brought in as a last-minute replacement.
    Location Location Fact: The UBS Washington, D.C. offices shown are set in the office building located at 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, and the interior offices shown are on the second floor, overlooking Pennsylvania Avenue, and across the street from the old Post Office Building.
    Hot Take Fact: According to Sidney Lumet, the "Mad As Hell" speech was filmed in one and a half takes. Midway through the second take, Peter Finch abruptly stopped in exhaustion. Lumet was unaware of Finch's failing heart at the time, but in any case, did not ask for a third take. The complete film features the second half of the first take and the first half of the second take.
    Awards And Accolades Fact: Beatrice Straight is only on-screen for five minutes and two seconds. Hers was the briefest performance ever to win an Oscar. Peter Finch died before the Academy Awards were to take place, where he was nominated for Best Actor. He won, making him the first performer ever to receive a posthumous award at the Oscars. The second winner was fellow Australian Heath Ledger for The Dark Knight (2008).

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You even know where the office is located 😂
      Oh no 😥 Peter Finch had a heart problem and yet he still played the role? The roles in this movie were intense. Anyone's blood pressure would've increased when acting out those shouting scenes.
      Beatrice Straight only had a five minute screen time?! I thought it was longer than that 😂. During that 5 minutes, she made quite an impact. I took her side of the argument, anyway.
      Thanks for sharing the fun facts as usual! 😊

    • @BigGator5
      @BigGator5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're welcome!
      Go in Peace and Walk with God. 😎 👍

  • @astroworfcraig9164
    @astroworfcraig9164 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I thought there was a lot of truth in this when it came out. Still is. Now you can add social media to the mix.

  • @michaelbuhl4250
    @michaelbuhl4250 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of my favorite characters in this movie is Laureen Hobbs. It's funny, and also tragic whether one agrees with her ideology or not, that her beliefs and principles go out the window and it all becomes about the media itself. To that same point, Howard Beale is the opposite of this in that he remains true to the message, whether that message is what he preaches after he learns he is to be fired or the message he preaches after his conversion to Jensen's "corporate cosmology." Of course, his devotion to that second message gets him killed.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, I agree. It was sadly funny when Laureen Hobbs went from "I'm going to make you a star" to "I'm not giving this ***.... a piece of my show!“
      Thanks for sharing your thoughts 😊

  • @im-gi2pg
    @im-gi2pg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Broadcast News is the other movie like this, but funny. 1987. Holly Hunter, William hurt, Albert brooks.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'll add it to my list. Thanks for the suggestion 😊

  • @kevind4850
    @kevind4850 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nice cast of great actors and was well-received at its release. Yes, this was a warning about a few broadcast networks at that time were turning their news departments into arms of their "entertainment" divisions (and a sensationalistic tabloid ethos, rather than true journalism with its rigorous guidelines and ethic). Unfortunately, people like Rupert Murdoch seem to have turned angry sensationalism into profit centers and dispensed with the ethics and nearly everywhere, we are all much poorer (except for the billionaires and corporations peddling the garbage) and less informed as a result. Even worse, anger and rage are prime fuel for the manipulations of demagogues, and we're seeing that worldwide, too. Dangerous, as you said, and ever much more in today's social media environment being mistaken for news or even reality.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Indeed. Many things on social media are believed to be "true news", but it is in fact misinformation.
      Another thing is "shorts". A lot of people take long videos (a news report, for example), then cut out a very small section to post as a video. This provides little to no context and can cause a big misunderstanding.
      A lot of platforms encourage us creators to make these short videos because it gets views easily. Why does it get views easily? It's because attention span is getting shorter, and a short video is the perfect "snack" for our brains.
      Don't get me wrong, short videos are absolutely great for certain content, and I like it too. But when it's abused, it causes many problems.

  • @davidfox5383
    @davidfox5383 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree with some of the others that this movie is more relevant now than it was in 1976. Prophetic, if you will, and stunningly powerful. I really miss this kind of filmmaking from this era. Another super powerful film from a few years later is The China Syndrome... I highly recommend it and I don't think anybody's reacted to it.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'll add The China Syndrome to my list. Thanks for suggesting it! 😊

  • @edmundherrera3055
    @edmundherrera3055 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a documentary

  • @DEWwords
    @DEWwords หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was pretty futuristic in 1976--- it's old hat now, old school the reality of it. --- Can I get a click? Do I hear an amen?

  • @bonitaburroughs8673
    @bonitaburroughs8673 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you like Faye Dunaway, you should watch "Mommie Dearest". She was amazing in the role of Joan Crawford.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll add it to my list. Thanks for your suggestion! 😊

  • @stephenclarke2206
    @stephenclarke2206 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Howard Beale would have his own social media channel now, he's actually a more intelligent & less swivel eyed version of Alex Jones

  • @JeffGes
    @JeffGes หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see satiric lines but I see a more imaginative "Is this what lays ahead?" and also that's the underlying theme for end-of-his[career William Holden. And Robert Duvall HAS to look up on Dragon Lady Faye Dunaway as that, too.

    • @JeffGes
      @JeffGes หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chasing Faye Dunaway... BONNIE & CLYDE is obligatory but I can't recommend it. She's part of the two THOMAS CROWN AFFAIRS. And the two THREE then FOUR MUSKETEERS. THREE DAYS OF THE CONDOR has her in a strong performance. EYES OF LAURA MARS.

    • @JeffGes
      @JeffGes หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pure Rupert Murdoch, too.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cool, I'll add some of those movies. Thanks for your suggestions! 😊

  • @vincentsaia6545
    @vincentsaia6545 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Paddy Cheyefsky and Sidney Lumet insisted that the movie was NOT a satire but where they felt television was going. In fact, the story was based on an actual incident: A Florida newswoman committed suicide on the air because she was nearly 30 and not yet married.

    • @user-kv2tj4du8p
      @user-kv2tj4du8p หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      the movie CHRISTINE (not be confused with the 80's horror movie about the car which is also titled CHRISTINE) starring Rebecca Hall is about that very real case down in Florida. it is pretty shocking story back when it happened, and still today. it is also an excellent film.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Because she was nearly 30 and not yet married"? I think the reason should be more than just that 🤔.
      I might check out this movie later on. Christine (2016), got it. Thanks for providing the movie name! 😊

    • @vincentsaia6545
      @vincentsaia6545 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@henryellow Perhaps there was but back then it was a big deal if a woman wasn't married by a certain age. There's even a joke about it in the movie AIRPLANE.

    • @user-kv2tj4du8p
      @user-kv2tj4du8p หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@vincentsaia6545 that was a real issue for women at that time very much so-the not being married thing. we were still in that time where women needed a husband and children to be thought of as complete by society. and yes, I love that part of AIRPLANE. which I just rewatched again a few days ago, ironically.
      but regarding the woman down in Florida, Christine Chubbuck, it is not thought not being married was the only reason she killed herself. she had a lot of other mental illness issues which the movie explores. there was a lot of troubling stuff going on for her to do something so extreme besides not being married. but that was a huge thing for women at this time in history.

    • @vincentsaia6545
      @vincentsaia6545 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In any case, the movie is not a satire.

  • @mikeduplessis8069
    @mikeduplessis8069 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In 1976 this film was satire. I don't think this is satire anymore. Its highly likely that Roger Ailes dreamed up Fox News after watching this film. It fits the timeline.

  • @FrancisXLord
    @FrancisXLord หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I would say there's a lot in this film that is more relevant today than it was in 1976. Replace the people in the boardroom with people trying to grow their own TH-cam channels. Playing pranks that could get themselves or others killed, or climbing to dangerous heights for the clicks. Only its not as simple as everyone trying to get rich, like the news company in this film. Everybody wants to be popular, as a way of distinguishing themselves from the 8,117,194,199 other people on Earth (at this writing) in order to qualify their existence in their own minds. It's quite sick actually, when you think about it.

    • @henryellow
      @henryellow  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed.
      In fact, the same thing is happening now. People are trying to grow their own YT channels, yes. As of now, there are over 60 million YT creators. Imagine that!
      But think about it. Who's the top player that gets a cut of profit from these millions of channels? YT itself. So it's still "a company" in charge of all this.
      BUT... and this is a big BUT...
      YT is also providing a platform and opportunity for each individual to share their content and ideas online. Without platforms like YT, people will find it tough to connect with a global audience and grow their virtual business. It's a low barrier of entry because you don't need a huge capital to start. That's the good side of it.
      There's a good and bad to everything. I suppose that's unavoidable. Let's make sure the good outweighs the bad 😊