Libel is a "false statement damaging to reputation". Kung chinachallenge siya ni trillanes with certain claims then it is indeed libel. Very invasive yung waiver waiver na yan and the whole quad comm hearing resulted in nothing anyway kasi it's insufficient para sa kaso based on the NBI. If the statement is false then Trillanes has damaged his reputation kasi nasisira ang pangalan niya. There is a systematic process when it comes to legal battles so "hearsay" such as this is absurd and does indeed lead to "libel". People can make long paragraphs of theories that make people look bad and it would be considered "libel".
![24 Oras Express: November 18, 2024 [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5RSdNJWnt7s/mqdefault.jpg)
Show your account to debunk it..
Mabuti nalaman nyo siguro ganon din ang ginagawa ng time ninyo.😢😮😢
You better stop Digong buking ka na
Still pretending to be strong despite weakness..... Too old to be true
Thinker is the doer, go to court puro palusot
My president prrd is correct. This martin romualdez is the orchestrator pbbm did nothing. Pbbm is just playin dumb.
Huh?
Thats ur thought
Dapat ma clean ni PRrD and pangalan niya if not mawawala tiwala ng taong bayan sa kanya ng tayung bayan.
file na yan... at ng malaman.
DUTERTE 👊🏻🇵🇭
Yes, palace and trilyones is hallucinating 😄
Pag si duterte nagsampa ng kaso eh siya ang respobsible to prove na sinungaling si trillanes. Abogado ba talaga yang si digong? 😂😂😂
the accuser must have the burden of proof, lalo sya d mag-si-sign ng waiver kasi ginagawa syang uto-uto
halata naman na sinungaling si trillanes ang proof is wla syang ebidensya
@ DDS ang ginagawang uto uto. or uto uto talaga sila sinasamantala lang ni duterte?
as a gay, nakikita ko sa aking gay radar na may something itong si Khonkun HAHAHAH parang ka federasyon namin
bakit ginamit ng quadcom si trililing?
Why cant Duterte sign the waiver to show his innocence. Although we all know, even the paid trolls how malicious Duterte is.
Libel is a "false statement damaging to reputation". Kung chinachallenge siya ni trillanes with certain claims then it is indeed libel. Very invasive yung waiver waiver na yan and the whole quad comm hearing resulted in nothing anyway kasi it's insufficient para sa kaso based on the NBI. If the statement is false then Trillanes has damaged his reputation kasi nasisira ang pangalan niya. There is a systematic process when it comes to legal battles so "hearsay" such as this is absurd and does indeed lead to "libel". People can make long paragraphs of theories that make people look bad and it would be considered "libel".