Distances to the sun and moon | Famous Math Problems 9 | NJ Wildberger

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @neilanderson6508
    @neilanderson6508 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I worked through this presentation slowly to present the material to high school maths students and found the section on calculating the circumference of the earth very accessible, but would be good if you explained how Aristarchus calculated the diameter of the moon through trigonometry.

  • @l1mmg0t
    @l1mmg0t 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    excellent excellent presentation

  • @AlpaOmega-nb5jm
    @AlpaOmega-nb5jm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done

  • @cgefkens4065
    @cgefkens4065 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for these great lectures

  • @binjm3a
    @binjm3a 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your great math teacher god bless you

  • @danielburke5917
    @danielburke5917 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much! I will purchase your PDFs!

  • @Achrononmaster
    @Achrononmaster 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For Plutophiles you might mention Pluto is still more than a rock, it is a Dwarf Planet, since it has not cleared the debris in its orbit, but this means in future it could become reclassified as a planet.

  • @tfxchronotfx2488
    @tfxchronotfx2488 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This should have more views,.. great lecture

  • @chiccocalleri
    @chiccocalleri 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautyfull lesson ! Thank' s Nornan
    About Platone residence in Siracusa we know that he was invited by the Dionisio and after a conversation about Virtue the tyrant was so irritated by the philosopher to sell him as a slave, Then the story goes on....

  • @pimwiersinga8822
    @pimwiersinga8822 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear explanation -- thank you, mr. Wildberger.

  • @sahhaf1234
    @sahhaf1234 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    dear mr. wildberger,
    is it also possible to make a video about how kepler discovered that the orbits are not circles but ellipses? I have never seen that explained clearly.
    also, there is a paper by curtis wilson, "the great inequality of jupiter and saturn from kepler to laplace". maybe it may give an idea about a future famousmathprobs :-).
    anyways, thanks for the extremely beautiful presentation.

    • @SpottedSharks
      @SpottedSharks 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carl Sagan's 1980 "Cosmos" series has a whole episode on this.

  • @SpottedSharks
    @SpottedSharks 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Takes me back to my university astronomy classes.

    • @relaxedpsycho4747
      @relaxedpsycho4747 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow so ur an astronomer?

    • @SpottedSharks
      @SpottedSharks 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@relaxedpsycho4747 amateur, not professional

  • @Reliquancy
    @Reliquancy 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    During the true total solar eclipse I saw in the middle of it it got pretty dark and all the crickets started in like they would at nighttime and the birds and everything it was great.

  • @shahineali5858
    @shahineali5858 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is one observable problem. Shadows do not act like perspective. From a single light source( the sun, for example) any object in the light will block the area that is the 2-dimensional shape and size of that object. The "tunnel" of shadow will continue through space until an object intercepts it. The area this shadow covers will be exactly the same size and shape as the object blocking the light. Perspective, on the other hand, is the apparent reduction in size of an object as the distance increases. Thus, it is due to perspective that the moon, though much smaller than the sun can eclipse the sun. This would be easy to verify. The totality of a solar eclipse can be seen over a very small area compared to Earth. If a group of observers photographed the eclipse from locations at the edges of the shadow they could calculate the exact size of the moon. This would let them find the true distance to the moon, knowing it's apparent size is a half degree. It will be found to be less than 4000miles(6436km) away. You can see my example on you tube "math challenges the moon landings". Also see www.crystalcodex.com for more stuff.

    • @YAWTon
      @YAWTon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You've got it all wrong: www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/umbra-shadow.html

  • @Goldspotter
    @Goldspotter 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But the Greeks did not know planets revolve around the Sun ...

    • @njwildberger
      @njwildberger  10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Goldspotter The Greeks had different views. Aristarchus proposed the heliocentric theory around 200 BC, but it was not widely accepted. But definitely the idea was around then.

    • @Alysm-Aviation
      @Alysm-Aviation 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Watapon, Religion and due to the fact that tools such as the telescope were not yet existent.