I am just about to learn this piece and I discovered this video at the perfect time! Thank you very much for your in-depth analysis video and hilarious addition of images!
It's not meant in a serious way. The motif from John Williams' score is conspiciously similar, but it's just as basic of a motif that we can for sure assume that the similarity is mere coincidence.
That EMaj7 at the end is simply wonderful and never gets old 🥰🥰
I love Ravel and his Impressionistic Style especially in his works about water.
Brilliantly done video and analysis. This deserves more views!
I'm learning a lot from your analysis videos! Keep up with the great job!
Thanks, that's so encouraging to hear!
I think something’s off about his C#5. You could always hear it sticking out. At 5:27 It’s got its own rhythm going. That’s so cool.
I am just about to learn this piece and I discovered this video at the perfect time! Thank you very much for your in-depth analysis video and hilarious addition of images!
Thanks so much! All the best for your time with this piece. :-)
This is amazing! I think tetratones really give that ravel-like oriental melody..!
Excellent, I just came across it.Thank you for uploading your analysis.
Thank you!
You're my lifesaver!
Lucky you! 🙂
Thank you for posting this! Great work.
You're welcome, thanks :)
Normalize adding tiny hints of memes and emojis in music analysis.
Brilliant work.
And also, 4:15. that's all.
Appreciated! :-D
thank you so much!!
You're welcome 😊
perfect
thx for posting this
You're welcome.
I would like to ask you why at 1:41 the chords are not C#7-9-13 and B7-9-13.
Thanks in advance for the reply!
👍
I don't understand the "thief" reference at 3:02. Are you implying that John Williams stole from Ravel, or did Ravel plagiarize someone else's music?
It's not meant in a serious way. The motif from John Williams' score is conspiciously similar, but it's just as basic of a motif that we can for sure assume that the similarity is mere coincidence.
1.43 feels like a Debussy quote but can't put my finger on it
its not