Buffalo nearly all gone, a vector for soil fertility was lacking. Topsoil losses were massive as was testified to by -dust-bowl- events. A blanket of green, whatever could be mustered, was deployed. Along the process of keeping that blanket (and the topsoil) the industry decided to feed only the crop plants and made them resistant to weed killers. You may not agree but you can't rationally state that it's good for nothing inasmuch as topsoil stays where it is. Eroding the acres dedicated to extensive monocultures is good and that's where a critically minded person like yourself can pitch-in; pistaccio works.
I am interested in investing in this business. Has the economics of this type of fishing been proven to be sustainable? What about the regulation aspect?
No one's answered your question. What a pity. It's a way down the timeline but if you're still interested, knowing country & region is key to discussing regulation and a great place to start. With a mere offshore fishfarming licence you'd be in their game at entry level because turnkey systems are available; that means YOU become a specialist in pursuing a licence for a place and a time-frame. Administratively, using a non-tethered system is administratively novel. Even with a mere offshore fishfarming licence (for a given place and timeframe) you'd be in their game at entry level. Feel free to press such like issues.
Could you build 15000 of these within a year and ship them to Australia? I require the capacity to hold 1.78 Million tonnes of Herring for the worlds largest Carbon sequestering project.
As a matter of culture you might want people at or near the facilities not because of security but because of culture. Society has an enormous bias to overcome (terrestrial airbreathing bipedal nature of our species) and a paradigm of offshore maritime governance presidia can create lot's of jobs while leaving more land for frolicking & nature. What do you think about primary productions comming from the seaside as norm?
@@n.g.s1mple29 Green and Blue-Green algea have a protein content between 40-60 percent of their weight. Soy has a lower protein content at about 30-50 percent.
You know the shit that goes into Soy? The phytoestrogen, the plant lectins/acid, pesticides ect. Maybe natural high protein/Omega 3 rich Algae should be a bigger focus.
That's GMO Monsanto soy, not good for Asian who's buying cheap soy (GMO) dump on global market to make Asian soy products... Surely not good for resultant farmed fish product...
it is likely that soy-fed fish have lower scoring parameters related to fertility in reproduction; aside from that you might qualify -surely not good- a bit more.
GMO soy, Land feed, wrong answer. Make bug hatcheries that can drop bugs into the water like sustainable permaculture method and also have some fresh plants for them fish to munch on. How would you like to eat only soy food? Give variety.
Interesting. Why are you even adding land grown feed into the ocean? Soy? Why?
GMO Soy from Monsanto... Nothing good that's why
Buffalo nearly all gone, a vector for soil fertility was lacking. Topsoil losses were massive as was testified to by -dust-bowl- events. A blanket of green, whatever could be mustered, was deployed. Along the process of keeping that blanket (and the topsoil) the industry decided to feed only the crop plants and made them resistant to weed killers. You may not agree but you can't rationally state that it's good for nothing inasmuch as topsoil stays where it is. Eroding the acres dedicated to extensive monocultures is good and that's where a critically minded person like yourself can pitch-in; pistaccio works.
It's high in protein, so they use soy as an alternative to feeding big fish, little fish which is what fishmeal is.
Its better than catching wild fish to fee them, do your research guys.
How do we reach you? If we want to help out with the aquapods and learn more?
I am interested in investing in this business. Has the economics of this type of fishing been proven to be sustainable? What about the regulation aspect?
No one's answered your question. What a pity. It's a way down the timeline but if you're still interested, knowing country & region is key to discussing regulation and a great place to start. With a mere offshore fishfarming licence you'd be in their game at entry level because turnkey systems are available; that means YOU become a specialist in pursuing a licence for a place and a time-frame. Administratively, using a non-tethered system is administratively novel. Even with a mere offshore fishfarming licence (for a given place and timeframe) you'd be in their game at entry level. Feel free to press such like issues.
sfbluestar not environmental impact
where can buy the brass mesh?
Interested in learning about PET mesh similar to brass mesh?
Could you build 15000 of these within a year and ship them to Australia? I require the capacity to hold 1.78 Million tonnes of Herring for the worlds largest Carbon sequestering project.
Cool idea. I can see that into the future a autonomous drone unsinkable solar powered
As a matter of culture you might want people at or near the facilities not because of security but because of culture. Society has an enormous bias to overcome (terrestrial airbreathing bipedal nature of our species) and a paradigm of offshore maritime governance presidia can create lot's of jobs while leaving more land for frolicking & nature. What do you think about primary productions comming from the seaside as norm?
Feed them algae not soy.
There predatory fish dude, thsts why high protein soy is used.
@@n.g.s1mple29 Green and Blue-Green algea have a protein content between 40-60 percent of their weight. Soy has a lower protein content at about 30-50 percent.
@@sedghammer Well, seems ive been schooled, i think theres another reason tho.
@@n.g.s1mple29 I'm betting it's just because that's the cheapest form of protein available.
You know the shit that goes into Soy? The phytoestrogen, the plant lectins/acid, pesticides ect. Maybe natural high protein/Omega 3 rich Algae should be a bigger focus.
Explain further please.
i agree drop the soy idea it might make it cheep but Im against subsidised crops and use cheep solar energy to reposition them
That's GMO Monsanto soy, not good for Asian who's buying cheap soy (GMO) dump on global market to make Asian soy products... Surely not good for resultant farmed fish product...
it is likely that soy-fed fish have lower scoring parameters related to fertility in reproduction; aside from that you might qualify -surely not good- a bit more.
do NOT use soy. Try using NON-farmed Vegetation(sustainable) for the fishes to feed on.
Soy contains High amounts of Estrogenic contents.
GMO soy, Land feed, wrong answer. Make bug hatcheries that can drop bugs into the water like sustainable permaculture method and also have some fresh plants for them fish to munch on. How would you like to eat only soy food? Give variety.
Soy ?