Why Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Hiding Their Children Archie and Lili

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @dennislucas8745
    @dennislucas8745 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I think they don't have any children .

  • @BettyBooper-z1i
    @BettyBooper-z1i ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I think if she had kids, she would want the attention of parading them around in cute outfits and merching them. Unless they didn’t meet her standards.

  • @zarajhudiel
    @zarajhudiel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +201

    I remember seeing Catherine disciplining her kids during her sister's wedding. That's how you know she's a hands-on parent.

    • @pameladigaetano8119
      @pameladigaetano8119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Yes! Totally remember that. She and the children are beautiful.

    • @morabrookes1972
      @morabrookes1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pameladigaetano8119-n Moo my

    • @shirleyminassian1547
      @shirleyminassian1547 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea....n like all normal parents we can actually SEE their children are REAL....there's no secrets, it's natural to protect your kids from the public when yr well known but this is rediculous....NO ONE has said they've seen them...Eugene has clearly been told by them to say she saw the harkles invisible kids.

    • @anajian-e7u
      @anajian-e7u 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kenapa haary dilahirkan dari seorang lady Diana biar dia bisa melihat kenyataan dunia bukan kehidupan dalam dongeng putri sinderela semua kenyataan bulsheet

  • @roxanne3959
    @roxanne3959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +374

    I'm so impressed with Kate. Kate and William seem to be the best parents interacting with their children in such loving manners. Kate talked to the young boy at the train station. She's obviously loves kids

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      She’s really fantastic with children! Thanks for watching!!

    • @annaassk7138
      @annaassk7138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Balancing act,that PW wife photo, they do it well&they seem real happy with their life. Not fake made up, as public figuresPW Charlotte did well days ago. To Georgs sports what sport get into mum rowing dad polo,sport will he take on,Charlotte aDiana more of dancer,in her would find fun.So normal PW is,with posh, jH.gave up it all for the abnormal.

    • @Denise_Warwick
      @Denise_Warwick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All show and tell to impress the masses.
      You do not know them-
      .

    • @lorrainearmstrong7587
      @lorrainearmstrong7587 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Denise_Warwick nor do you. WE know 'the type'

    • @MarieAntoinetteandherlittlesis
      @MarieAntoinetteandherlittlesis ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m American, and not necessarily an avid “Royal” fan. But I am a mother, right. I saw this clip of Catherine talking to this random boy at an event. He tried to do a backflip and didn’t pull it off. He looked kinda disappointed that he didn’t do it and she was SO patient. Instead of smiling and moving on, she actually said “would you like to try it again?” And she convinced him to do it again and he did it and landed it! From one mother to another, I can tell she’s probably a good mom. Only a mom would pick up on his disappointed face, and know that the way to make him feel better was to make him persevere. So that he didn’t leave with regret, feeling like he blew it. I was so impressed. I have 3 little sons. It’s little things like that that make a mommy out of a mother. Catherine is a Mommy.

  • @lindaodd9681
    @lindaodd9681 2 ปีที่แล้ว +547

    Here in the UK we have lost interest in the ghost children. This couple are so vile how the hell would she interact with their children? I’m very suspicious about the whole subject. Something very weird going on. 🥶

    • @manofernando9918
      @manofernando9918 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      RF knows the truth but they are also hiding it cause they don't want to hurt their man-child.

    • @Bbeff.Baby.
      @Bbeff.Baby. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      Yeah I’m American and I’m very suspicious 🤨 as well .

    • @suemcdermott2947
      @suemcdermott2947 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Best they and their father are removed from the line of succession. They need not come here ever again. We have wasted far too much taxpayers money on this nasty family.

    • @Breeanna73
      @Breeanna73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      So has us in Australia. They're so badly mocked here😂😂😂

    • @lindaodd9681
      @lindaodd9681 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@thehiltongirl yes it is strange. Especially when she gave her patients no warning. She would have known she was going to interact with the Harkles though 🤔maybe they threatened her in some way , in a nice way! 🥶 Allegedly 🙄 I think whatever their aim was/is not letting us see the children , has now backfired on them. Now we see the two of them as even more arrogant and deluded people who are maybe planning to merch those children by which time none of us will be interested. Their behaviour is disgusting. Long live our beloved Queen 💕🇬🇧

  • @carollynnberwindscheffler398
    @carollynnberwindscheffler398 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They have no children

  • @susangunn5866
    @susangunn5866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +416

    From experience, narcissists are terrible parents. Pray for these children. If they do not do exactly what the parents want, they will be condemned and humiliated.

    • @afreeman63
      @afreeman63 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      I agree, narcissists see thrir children as appliances and use them accordingly.

    • @Dizfan
      @Dizfan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its going to back fire on MM once they know the Truth. She has No idea what's coming.

    • @Tomtaylor7337
      @Tomtaylor7337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Just wait a few more years , merchie and lilibucks will come out with their own memoir 🤣

    • @Rumkitty2000
      @Rumkitty2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      I don't believe these children exist, or else someone, some Paparazzo would have gotten a photo of them. Surely they leave their home sometimes. They have to.

    • @helgahaslinger3236
      @helgahaslinger3236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Meine Mutter hatte eine narzistische Persönlichkeitsstörung. Ich bin 60 ich leide heute noch unter ihren psychischen Grausamkeiten. Sie starb vor 3 Jahren und mir träumt mindestens 2x die Woche von ihren Taten. Soviel macht hat sie jetzt noch über mich

  • @LISA75_
    @LISA75_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +369

    When Meghan did the story time with Archie, the thing that hit me was , he had no connection with her , it was like she was someone he was dropped off with, he paid no attention to her or anything she was doing or saying , and you are correct when you said she just looked annoyed that he was not hitting his mark .

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      It was so contrived and she was not happy with his wiggling. Thanks for watching!!

    • @sandyno1089
      @sandyno1089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Let's hope his nannies love him.

    • @suemcdermott2947
      @suemcdermott2947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      She looks like she's never had read time with him.

    • @LizzieDripping67
      @LizzieDripping67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Totally agree it certainly looked like it wasn’t something they were comfortable doing , he wasn’t reacting to his mummy

    • @sueoetting2973
      @sueoetting2973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      The other thing about that story time was the way he was ( or actually wasn’t) dressed: onesie and soggy diaper. For the big birthday reveal , wouldn’t a proud mother have her child dressed in something cute ( something she could have later merched). It’s almost like she didn’t want him taking the spotlight from her. Then there were those exasperated looks when he wouldn’t sit still and listen to the utterly boring book she was reading

  • @lesleywarron7118
    @lesleywarron7118 2 ปีที่แล้ว +361

    As they want their kids to be 'private citizens' they should not become a Prince or Princess.

    • @justcallmeD90
      @justcallmeD90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Agree

    • @Rumkitty2000
      @Rumkitty2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      They can't have it both ways

    • @catherineannelockman3805
      @catherineannelockman3805 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      If they are real.......

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Agreed!! But Harry and Meghan don’t believe that! Thanks for watching!!

    • @drayner2517
      @drayner2517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Remember how they wanted to be live 'normal' lives and not be in the press? Yeah, right. Every opportunity they get there are photos, speeches made, inappropriate visits to tragedy sites and they still use the titles of Duke and Duchess! Yep, completely normal H and M.

  • @irenehannan4731
    @irenehannan4731 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Don't believe they exist!
    It's all a mess and she lies so much !
    She's not a young mother and would have been in the at high risk !

  • @daydreamerlk69
    @daydreamerlk69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Harry bashed his father's parenting and said he needed to break the cycle and yet they spend absolutely no time with their children... yet nobody calls Harry out on the fact that he spends more time away from his children than he does with them so before he calls his own father a bad parent he should evaluate his own parenting

    • @diane4488
      @diane4488 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Every time I see MeGain with the children she seems to be so awkward, like she doesn't know how to deal with them, and how to hold them.
      They surely lied about the miscarriage. They said they took the body home from the hospital, and buried it beneath a tree in the garden. Harry said he dug the grave with his bare hands!
      Do they seriously think the public is that dim?
      First of all, who would do that?
      And secondly, it's illegal. The hospital and authorities would not permit it.
      Why don't more news outlets publicise the outright lies these two tell?

    • @shirleyminassian1547
      @shirleyminassian1547 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@diane4488The news outlets are being paid by Hitlery Clinton n a Biden member because Biden the pretend President is not really here, they should let the man rest....correction, OBAMA should let Biden Snr rest, he's unfit n unwell...total elder abuse. These ppl are supporting Maggot Ragland, ppl aren't stupid that's why Ragland hates Trump so much, if Trump supported her filthy ways she would have kissed his ass, shes good at that cause just like Amber Heard she uses men to get what she wants that's why it's quite funny how she thinks she's supporting n liberating women 🤦🤦

    • @bobbiejones9266
      @bobbiejones9266 ปีที่แล้ว

      Harry is a loser in everything he attempts!!

  • @redreaper2752
    @redreaper2752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    In her recent Me Me Me speech, she paused for (demanded) applause for becoming a mother, and I now realize why the polite applause was so hollow. You’re right, it’s because we’ve never really seen her actually MOTHER. But since she knows her kids would take all the attention away from her, we most likely never will.

    • @BlackStump172
      @BlackStump172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Most of the women at the function were probably mothers .

    • @sandyno1089
      @sandyno1089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@BlackStump172 Most women are. 🥰

    • @davidmckibben1931
      @davidmckibben1931 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They don't want to be seen with a black mother

    • @jackiehammack-og4uq
      @jackiehammack-og4uq ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidmckibben1931 meghan is biracial you nut

    • @alibi509
      @alibi509 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@davidmckibben1931
      That's right 😂

  • @marjoriejohnston3038
    @marjoriejohnston3038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    Instinctively I know there is something fishy about the story about the kids. I've had 3 kids and when they spin you a yarn you know they aren't telling you the truth

  • @standstrongforus8399
    @standstrongforus8399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    She went way overdue with "her" first child. They had to wait to see when the baby was born before they announced anything. I am shocked that they really couldn't give a due date and it kept changing. In all honesty she looked more pregnant when they presented the baby than the last months of the pregnancy. Strange.

  • @gnas3390
    @gnas3390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +287

    If those children really do exist, I pity them. I couldn't imagine having those two for parents.

    • @annaassk7138
      @annaassk7138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Its a interesting community doco saw while back. He helps keep&educate old skills welding blacksmithing to fencing farming animal care to restoring buildings. Important toPC how it going PW George spending more time there,learning how it works. Invisible suxxs so over it the photo between knees did it for me,theres no kids by her she looks looked too old have, to no kids near them,no way they could cope or responsible enough. They constant ready to explode.Poor dog once in the way what really went down wiith that.

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kendraroth1276 Meghan’s father Thomas Markle said in some interview that Meghan has always wanted children. And what do you mean Meghan is the main problem? She’s their mother. Harry and Meghan as a couple were the ones who planned and decided to have children. They literally said in their engagement interview that they hoped to start a family in the future. If Meghan’s such a problem for her children then what do you want to be done about it?

    • @brendadickson1755
      @brendadickson1755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Megan has never wanted kids, when she married 1st time she was expecting, she had a baby girl, the parents of joe and when they found out they had got married the parents of joe had the marriage annulled, again due to her age, then went on to have twin boys which she had adopted, after that she became a yacht girl, her 2nd marriage to Trevor she thought he would get her into films, she did a few, some not very nice, and she told him she was barren, she got into Suits and sent Trevor his wedding rings back to him by post, then having affairs with Co stars then a rich chef which she was cheating on while seeing Harry,then her closest friend Marcus Anderson introduced her to Soho House, and her friend said Harry would be there, she could not wait, sidled up to him, and that man eater knew how to seduce him,the rest we all know, no children from them, I think she told him in Botswana she was pregnant and that was why the wedding was quick,BLACKMAIL why have she not sued people for saying she has never had kids,at her time of life,have paid money to her family 🐀🇺🇸

    • @trawlins396
      @trawlins396 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Khemani_RL how much are you paid to come online and defend that selfish nothing? She's a 🐝. She doesn't want to ge a mother. Those two ADOPTED kids are nothing but PROPS.

    • @trawlins396
      @trawlins396 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@annaassk7138 nothing you wrote made sense.

  • @cheryldrury3165
    @cheryldrury3165 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Their kids don't exist!!

  • @julesl4525
    @julesl4525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I don't believe those kids exist.

  • @dawn8843
    @dawn8843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    I’m convinced if there were children she would have made money off baby clothes books food etc. She would never have passed up this money making opportunities

    • @writeonbetty7835
      @writeonbetty7835 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Exactly. Thank You. I just expressed the same thing before I read your comment. NO WAY would money-hungry, greedy MEghan not want in on that.

    • @dawn8843
      @dawn8843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@writeonbetty7835 yes also pregnancy lines. This is the biggest red flag 🚩 for me always was.

    • @writeonbetty7835
      @writeonbetty7835 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dawn8843 I agree. I think this was the biggest HOAX ever perpetrated on the British taxpayers. Fake baby showers, one maternity dress cost $100,000!! She's a complete fraud, and there should be consequences for what she's done. The kid in Africa? Borrowed! The constant holding of the bump? Holding it in place. Is she capable of doing something like this?? INDEED SHE IS!!

    • @AXCat-kh6vg
      @AXCat-kh6vg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Give it a minute, it's coming

    • @dawn8843
      @dawn8843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@writeonbetty7835 sloppy lazy journalists and media turning a blind eye while H and M mocked everyone A few of us were not fooled though

  • @denb695
    @denb695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    At the polo match she hardly looked at the baby and when reading the book Archie didn't turn and look at his mother. Mothers are always looking at their babies and as babies grow they turn towards their mother,I never see it with Archie.

    • @judytreischl6899
      @judytreischl6899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Meghan seemed irritated by the baby and later the child. Very detached.

    • @nickimillennium
      @nickimillennium 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@judytreischl6899 I’ve always noticed that Meghan and Doria seem detached from each other in all of their pictures. They act like cordial strangers on an elevator. I’m not at all surprised that Meghan seems indifferent to her own children

  • @lynetteedwards9865
    @lynetteedwards9865 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Strange how Charles didn't mention them in his speech. All he said was Harry and Meagan 🤔

  • @mariapelayo6276
    @mariapelayo6276 2 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    I for one don’t think they had any children together. They may have two children but they are not theirs! When I saw that photo with her baby bump down to her knees, that convinced me! I’m from a family of 10 and have observed many pregnant women and never in almost 80 years have I seen that before!!

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      The bumps are weird. They never match her gestational time! Look at the Nottinghill photo announcing Lily's pregnancy. She is supposed to be barely pregnant and she looks ready to bear twins. Lily is an easy pregnancy to fake in the US with HIPPA laws! She had Archie on top of the huge bump. Archie was too big to ride on such a big bump. Harry looks so miserable 😭 it makes you think where are the kids and that joy and contact high you carry into other situations because you are so in love with your baby. And you want to talk about them. It's hard to stop. Nothing tracks when it comes to their "children!"

    • @voneychiu2828
      @voneychiu2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@robinsmarts yes, if the babies were real, H would have looked happier .. noone can contain baby happiness ... i have male friend who owns persia cat, gave birth to 6 kitties, he sent me pics and videos ... the kitty munching his hair at 2 am, things like that
      Baby fever can't be tamed, parents surely want to share ..

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yet if you saw a picture of Archie’s face right now with him resembling either Meghan or Harry you’d still refuse to believe it.

    • @voneychiu2828
      @voneychiu2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Khemani_RL photoshop exists ... beside harry himself been told resembled Hewitt, some said his close eyes resembled P Charles, some said he looked like P Phillip when he was young and some claimed he looked like the Spencer clan ...
      There!! Myself went to campus and people thought I'm a sister of one of the teacher cos I look like her .. went to buy street food and the seller thought I'm the sister of the florist behind her stall ..
      Besides photoshopped, unreseanable things can make someone appear alike ..
      If Tom Cruise says Iain Armitage (Young Sheldon) is his son I believe him cos that's how I picture Cruise as a 6 year old boy even tho they have no DNA relation ...
      The tough one to believe it's her son cos she wasn't pregnant but faking it .. if she came clean about surrogate maybe easier to believed tho it's still hard to see her son with no black traits at all ... Doria is full black, not biracial like some sugars like to preach ... google it you can find doria ragland family tree

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@voneychiu2828 It’s obvious that Archie would be lighter than Meghan because he’s only 25% black. And think in your right mind for a second. Do you think it’s possible to fake an entire pregnancy and an entire child’s existence when you are in an institution like the royal family where real documents must be used in everything that happens surrounding your life? And Meghan’s weight gain speaks volumes. The fat distribution in her face and body looked like a woman who just gave birth. And you can’t just say that Archie doesn’t look like Meghan when we haven’t really had any head on photos of his face

  • @AngelaEatsMusic
    @AngelaEatsMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I recall Markle saying that they wouldn't be having nannies, as they wanted to be 'hands-on parents' with their child. Obvious shade thrown at Catherine (and William, but in my opinion that was for Catherine). Yet, we can now see them traveling to events and visiting, both close to home *and* other countries without the children in sight. So, either these children are constantly with nannies or taking care of themselves. Ugh! Her hypocrisy and vindictiveness is so transparent, appalling and an insult to the intelligence of the people to whom they preach.
    *Edit: I mean, they didn't even take Archie to pick out a Christmas tree for their PR stunt that year! Who does that? Disgusting.*

  • @canadiangirl7439
    @canadiangirl7439 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Never seen him at all with the kids and she is Awkward with any child as there is no maternal instinct

  • @kathykautz3425
    @kathykautz3425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They botch everything they attempt to do. They are clueless.

  • @barbarahanratty4174
    @barbarahanratty4174 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Personally, I don't think their children should have titles and if they decide to come back to the UK, I'm moving to Montecito!

  • @iamneverwrong1
    @iamneverwrong1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Want to know WHY William and Catherine don’t have problems like lies, rumors and scandal surrounding their children? Cause they don’t do S**T like this. Period.

  • @kathrynelam6860
    @kathrynelam6860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Archie was Prince George's security name. Meghan Markle stole that to.

    • @heatherallison6960
      @heatherallison6960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      As well as the dead cat she fed frozen grapes to and Harrison after a pair of slippers on sale at Soho House

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Narc revenge through innocent children. Look how she treated Charlotte during the bridesmaid fitting

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      She really is not original. Also, she apparently liked the Archie comics series. Thanks for watching!!

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But what if they just wanted to name their son Archie because they like the name? Any parent can name their son Archie if they want to. George doesn’t own it, and it’s not like Meghan stole the name. There are thousands of people named “Archie” in this world

    • @ajrwilde14
      @ajrwilde14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Khemani_RL she is known for her plagiarism

  • @lynn8487
    @lynn8487 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Uncle Andrew is the problem here again - as a 'spare' he is the only one of the Queen's children whose children got Princess titles, he campaigned for them, but it leaves a bad precedent. Anne and Edward, as 'spares' did not seek prince/princess titles for their kids. Even Princess Margaret, the Queen's sister, did not seek prince/Princess titles for her children back in those days. Only those in the direct line of succession - Charles' kids and now William's kids, should have prince/Princess titles nowadays.

  • @zl3965
    @zl3965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    Something that has triggered me is that after Lilibet was born Meghan almost completely stopped mentioning Archie. It was all just Lilibet in the context of Meghan's feminist narrative.

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      That’s a topic for another video, but I’ve thought the same. The focus clearly shifted to Lili. Thanks for watching!!

    • @gailobrien9380
      @gailobrien9380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yeah, I’ve found this quite disturbing!

    • @patsimpson7834
      @patsimpson7834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yes, they even had pics of them at polo on Archie's birthday. He was not with them.

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But when they were in Wyoming, they only took Archie though. They were primarily spending time with Archie specifically

    • @maryshaffer8557
      @maryshaffer8557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Khemani_RL That was not Archie. I don't believe that they were in Wyoming at all. I am getting sick of all the photoshopping and false narratives .

  • @SRowan-fr1nl
    @SRowan-fr1nl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    They really don’t act like they have children. It’s all so strange. She’s not maternal and he’s not paternal. She did say that the pandemic gave them time to be with their children ; otherwise, they’d be traveling all over the world promoting their causes. I would think their greater cause would be their children. The world does not need them to save it. Why have children when this is your agenda? They are so pathetic.

  • @truffles2721
    @truffles2721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    Sneaking and hiding are what dishonest people do.

    • @feefiisaifon7131
      @feefiisaifon7131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Your comment just explains everything.

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But it’s their children. As parents they have every right to protect the privacy of their children. There are a lot of parents on social media who aren’t even famous who still choose to not show their children online. And Eugenie and Beatrice never show their children yet it doesn’t seem to be a problem to you. We’ve never seen Sienna before

    • @feefiisaifon7131
      @feefiisaifon7131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Khemani_RL Not showing and hiding is different meaning HERE.

    • @janetshemaryahu5529
      @janetshemaryahu5529 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, narcissists confuse, create chaos, gaslight, manipulate reality, obfuscate, I could go on. These behaviors are employed as tools of emotional/psychological abuse but also to give cover to their tricks and deceit. Bower’s book gives such a good description of the chaos, confusion, and inexplicable contradictions H&M demonstrated around the pregnancy, birth, and after birth of Archie that there can’t be any doubt this was done by abnormal people to cover up subterfuge. No normal, straightforward couple behaves like this.

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@janetshemaryahu5529 But as parents what if they want to protect the privacy of their children?

  • @afreeman63
    @afreeman63 2 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    I am British and a monarchist, for different reasons. While I really have no interest in the invisible children, any child in the line of succession should be shown to the public. I am sure you know about the warming pan baby scandal!
    I have to admit I loathe the gruesome twosome.
    I enjoy your channel so keep up the good work!

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Aww, thank you so much! If they want to retain titles for their children, they need to show them otherwise no one will care. They miscalculated for sure. Thanks for watching!!

    • @sandyno1089
      @sandyno1089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The two American kids should be removed from the line of succession immediately, it's an insult to the people of Britain. I'm anti monarchy now, once the queen passes so should the monarchy. Just my opinion.

    • @sandyno1089
      @sandyno1089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@thehiltongirl And Archie looked enormous on his first birthday, like a toddler.

    • @susankeating8678
      @susankeating8678 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hear hear, personally I too have absolutely no interest in those invisible kids whatsoever & there is no doubt that vile woman did not give birth. The photos of the baby bump proved that, forever changing size & even slipping down to her knees on one occasion. What I care about is the fact that they are on the Monarchy website as being in the line of succession. That is outrageous in my opinion. I’m convinced that the Queen hasn’t even met them despite the photo of her & Prince Philip looking at Archie. That is photoshopped & neither child was with them at the Jubilee either.
      Are they really so stupid to think we’re all taken in by their childish games? And how are they going to explain everything when those kids grow up & can speak for themselves? It beggars belief & I’m sick of the whole charade. I wish they would just disappear off the face of the Earth.

    • @Candy-O1776
      @Candy-O1776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes, I read about that just yesterday, plots going back centuries.

  • @kayvoigt1735
    @kayvoigt1735 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Being an American I tend to believe there are no children. Every photo you see is a different child. If you're going to issue two photos on one day you need to make sure they're the same kid as little bit as two different babies posted of her. Then maybe take some photos of their faces instead of their backs, filter in animation. They've carried it so to the extremes nobody really cares anymore. If they aren't excited about their kids then we aren't. God help those children if they really are real as I don't think they ever see the light of day. And I wish the royal family would insist upon a DNA before they list them on the succession table. I'm curious as to how Harry and Megan are going to weasel their way out of this when kids are supposed to grow up and take on their mature looks they will carry through life with them. It'll certainly be interesting.

    • @bb89670
      @bb89670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Photos were from catalogs and photoshopped.

    • @valkyriesardo278
      @valkyriesardo278 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I want Harry and his offspring removed from the LOS, particularly those children. The children are blameless of course, but their ascension would be a disaster. They are being raised outside the Commonwealth in complete ignorance of their heritage and by parents who have no sense of duty, loyalty, or integrity. There are others in the LOS who have proven themselves and are far more qualified, Princess Anne to name just one. Regards from the USA.

    • @walterbolter4320
      @walterbolter4320 ปีที่แล้ว

      Worse parenting skills than Michael Jackson.

    • @walterbolter4320
      @walterbolter4320 ปีที่แล้ว

      Prince Andrew has been queue-jumped by these mysterious ‘children.’ If they are royally illegitimate, then this is Treason. Easy to determine one-way or another.

    • @mchapman132
      @mchapman132 ปีที่แล้ว

      They will be at private school, somewhere far away in some country. They want their privacy. Lol lol lol
      Then one day there will be a press release that they perished in a school fire. RIP make believe children.

  • @stellaburnell7947
    @stellaburnell7947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    It was great to see how natural the other Royals were with their children, during the Platinum Jubilee. Watching Louis climb on Prince Charles' lap , seeing him making faces at Kate when he was bored, seeing the other older children interacting with each other ...just normal family stuff. Meantime Harry and Meghan had already jumped ship and headed back to California in a huff. They just make mistake after mistake . Two silly people.

    • @raymcdonald6734
      @raymcdonald6734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I totally agree. IF the children really do exist then why didn’t they come with Harry and Me-gain bring them to the Jubilee?

    • @thepatchlady2009
      @thepatchlady2009 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Quid Pro Quo a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something. They expect quid lots of quid more and more pounds, cents dollars cash lots of it a give nothing In return. Who cares about those kids no one,including their parents, the families may care but can't do anything about it. Now we know how they have used those kids. They are sad when mom and dad are there. They are never there..

  • @heatherallison6960
    @heatherallison6960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Invisible children shouldn't be in the LOS

    • @sueannnatter5295
      @sueannnatter5295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes and in my opinion the Queen wanted a correct birth certificate or DNA test and then M got the heck out of dodge and didn't even bring Archie back from Canada when they 'stepped back' was probably afraid to.

    • @alangknowles
      @alangknowles 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The announcement on the Palace gate was NOT signed by doctors. The first time this happened. She used surrogates for both births and they wouldn't hand them over.

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The royal family isn’t dumb. They don’t just put random children in the line of succession. Obviously before adding them, they would check all legal documents of the children before adding them. Just because you choose not to release a public photo doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be in Line of Succession. They may have shared photos and videos privately within the family

  • @malishmalishovic8844
    @malishmalishovic8844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    She will stage that poor little Lilibet when she runs out of PR ideas.

  • @rosalynmoyle3766
    @rosalynmoyle3766 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Agree on the name choices. The children are at risk and maybe child services should look into as they will be subjected to emotional and psychological abuse

    • @stephanieeverson102
      @stephanieeverson102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Montecito child protection services was called. They said that there's no children living there. Tyler perry's staff admitted that there's no kids living there. The reason why Megan & Harry were thrown out of his home is because Megan was very rude to perry's staff. Hence why there were moving vans.

  • @cathyann1601
    @cathyann1601 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My understanding is that both babies are adopted.

  • @frankibelt8447
    @frankibelt8447 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    they don't exist or have children in their custody

  • @annecurrence7746
    @annecurrence7746 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    If these kids are real, I'm the Queen of England.

  • @RT-dk7yv
    @RT-dk7yv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    In the same sense that it’s rude to talk about a party with a friend who was not invited, I feel like it’s in bad taste to talk about your children publicly when you hide them from the public.

    • @jenj6202
      @jenj6202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @R T Wow!! Excellent way to express that!!

  • @Westpark16
    @Westpark16 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Prince and Princess titles should go to grandkids in direct line only . Given how much time passed Charles has every right to update the letters of patent to modernize as other monarchies have .

    • @janetwebb2701
      @janetwebb2701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Charles isn't King. Letters patent are up to the ruling monarch.

    • @Westpark16
      @Westpark16 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@janetwebb2701 I know that .,when he does he can.

    • @M50568
      @M50568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yep, it definitely would make more sense. Hope Prince Charles will go for it despite the fact that Harkles would again push the race card.

    • @grumpyowl66
      @grumpyowl66 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      King Charles is the only person who CAN give titles to those children, but I'd personally want absolute proof of their true parentage, DNA undoctored birth certificates with conformation by a royal doctor of meghan having given birth to both. If not thats criminal offence and must be removed from succession with the Prince Harry. I call that treasonous, fraud, and every other despicable thing those 2 have said and done.

  • @Loki-ko2mq
    @Loki-ko2mq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    The whole thing reminds me of that movie Flowers in the Attic…the kids are hidden in the house and just not allowed to come out if they exist!

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hope Archie and Lily don't end up getting together as a couple like the end of the Flower in the Attics series books!!! Ewwwww

    • @petsnaturetv1690
      @petsnaturetv1690 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robinsmarts lol

    • @pameladigaetano8119
      @pameladigaetano8119 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ohhh.. remember that book!

    • @lindamcnellis6768
      @lindamcnellis6768 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right, Children's Protective Services need to do a welfare check. The kids, if they exist, should not be isolated. They need to be outside playing and engaging with other children. If they stay completely isolated, it is going to affect their child development.

  • @tennesseenana4838
    @tennesseenana4838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would add children of WORKING ROYALS who live in the UK to be able to receive any titles. For wanting to live under the radar, so to speak, they sure are doing a lot of PR. Private life = out of sight - both H&M. Definitely not happening! Several heart-breaking stories from Nannies coming out now about the kids' treatments from M. ???

  • @tammy7724
    @tammy7724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Did you see in the video of Meghan reading to Archie where Archie at the end starts to say dada and Megan looks at the camera and says, “duck rabbit”! She couldn’t stand the fact that Archie called for his daddy while sitting in her lap! It was so awkward

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It was a pretty awkward video! I included clips of it in my video, so I can avoid possible copyright issues. Thanks for watching!!

    • @sueirving5348
      @sueirving5348 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup...probably the same thing he said when they said that he said "crocodile"

  • @susanmorgan8833
    @susanmorgan8833 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    It would be surprising if the Harkles could now do anything to garner much interest in their supposed children. There have been so many games played around the children that it's difficult to be sure the Harkles actually have any children, other than the ones they borrow for the few instances they have 'Archie" out for a photo shoot.

  • @helenmontgomery5357
    @helenmontgomery5357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    You said we hardly ever see Archie and Lili. Correction: we have never seen Archie and Lili. all we have seen are fake pictures of Archie and Lili.

  • @lauraragazzi464
    @lauraragazzi464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I think she was not pregnant, her behaviors and her belly are against all the laws of physics. I think the confusion about her labor was created to cover up something. I think that when they introduced Archie it was a reborn doll. The resemblance is striking, the baby doesn't move at all, doesn't cry at all, and Harry said he was weeks old. Lilibet's pregnancy was hidden. They don't behave like parents.

    • @peepkagirl1
      @peepkagirl1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Was also a doll she was carrying when she was walking the dogs in Canada. "Sue Me" has a video in which she proves, without question, it was a doll!

    • @nancylowens9842
      @nancylowens9842 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I have wondered about the same thing. I think when Harry was holding Archie at Windsor Palace he deliberately didn't carry the baby so his head and face wouldn't be shown. Even after someone in the press asked Harry to show more of Archie, Harry really didn't move the blankets so Archie face could be seen.

    • @ajrwilde14
      @ajrwilde14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nancylowens9842 he has never been seen in Britain IMO

    • @bb89670
      @bb89670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It was a reborn doll, her bump fell to her feet and on video it deflated. There were videos and photos.

  • @valeriebarber4325
    @valeriebarber4325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    They should not become prince or princess. As they grow I can imagine them being really angry at their parents for the choices they made.

  • @barbarachristian5062
    @barbarachristian5062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    They missed that window if she thought the kids were her next meal ticket, people loose interest!

  • @RailinX
    @RailinX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    haha keeping your kid in just a onesie is definitely not "California casual". We, too, put actual clothes on our children, especially when taking pictures meant for the public! :D
    You're right, she didn't seem connected with Archie during that weird book reading video.

    • @cathycampbell8928
      @cathycampbell8928 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Connected? He didn't know who she was!

    • @gbarnett9470
      @gbarnett9470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As a fashion person I could such a different video with designer labels. Trying to walk between H & M holding his hands Playing with rescue dogs in backyard. A good cake smash video. Or copy photo style of Prince George or Prince Louie. Favorite sneak into England and have a photo with Queen of Elisabeth II or even Granddaddy Charles (even if they had to quarantine)

    • @RailinX
      @RailinX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gbarnett9470 right!! So many missed photo opportunities …

    • @lindamcnellis6768
      @lindamcnellis6768 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cathycampbell8928 That is the way it looked to me. Regarding weight gain. Actors do it all the time for various roles.

  • @jessicabrewer1720
    @jessicabrewer1720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    They turned down titles for Archie already. Why should he just get the titles they want?

    • @justcallmeD90
      @justcallmeD90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      To make money off the children

    • @AXCat-kh6vg
      @AXCat-kh6vg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because they don't want him to be an Earl, they want the Prince title

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They turned them down because, at the time, he would have been the Earl of Dumbarton, and they didn’t like “dumb” in his name. They’re waiting for the “prince” title to kick in when Charles becomes king, but I think they’ve miscalculated. Thanks for watching!!

    • @jessicabrewer1720
      @jessicabrewer1720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@RoyalNewsNetwork that's such a ridiculous reason. Love your videos!

    • @lemoncrash1814
      @lemoncrash1814 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They didn’t turn down the prince title, they, as usual were lying, knowing that the palace wouldn’t say anything. Only the children and grandchildren of the sovereign can be made a prince or princess.

  • @renekirebornrenekireborn4777
    @renekirebornrenekireborn4777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    As M's mother said 'Don't give the milk away for free' That's how she sees her kids IMO. Saving them for the highest bidder.

    • @acb5245
      @acb5245 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep. Meghan Markle is an operator and a calculator. She´s a malignant narcissist and Prince Harry is a covert narcissist. They are both mentally ill. The children are just an investment for Meghan Markle. There is a disconnect between Archie and MM. There is no emotionel attachment. The child doesnt look at her once. Being a narcissist, the attention has to be on MM.

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yep, I think that’s the case. Thanks for watching!

    • @maryshaffer8557
      @maryshaffer8557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@RoyalNewsNetwork I don't agree. Too much time has gone by for that to be the case. I do not believe there are children living in Moneycito$$$$$.

    • @rachael8796
      @rachael8796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup, Doria. There is a mystery. Still waters run deep.

    • @rebagaudet9944
      @rebagaudet9944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I don't think there are kids

  • @vivienlawson7256
    @vivienlawson7256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am not interested in seeing these ghosts kids I am a grandma and I never stop talking about my kids and grandchildren these 2 never mentioned there children unless someone asked about them

  • @vickimcdonald4912
    @vickimcdonald4912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Yes u r right, only if children were brought up in UK would they be able to be PRINCE and PRINCESS IMO and I don’t believe they even exist and only wants to monetise those so called children

  • @Rando15
    @Rando15 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    It is a fact that there were no children on the private jet that flew them back to the US after the jubilee. The supposed picture of Nutmeg holding Lili at the supposed bday party was a photo taken years ago when she was much slimmer.

  • @feefiisaifon7131
    @feefiisaifon7131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    The way they keep reminding people that they have children makes me believe that they do not actually have any kids of their own. I feel nervous for the RF in case of something bad happen to those kids, this evil couple will blame the palace like people do with the death of Diana. I do not wish anyone harm but something very weird & very wrong is going on.

    • @judybrown7601
      @judybrown7601 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Scares me too...even the children

  • @sissy9393
    @sissy9393 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think it’s very, very strange. I mean are they not going to even take them to Disney Land? So the children must live behind walls and not see and play in the outside world. Strange

  • @amywright3124
    @amywright3124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They come off as snobs. They need the public to buy their books and watch their shows, but they don't think they have to share anything in return.

  • @maryscott2332
    @maryscott2332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some one from the USA should go to the home and investigate if there is children there while the parents are in UK

  • @justcallmeD90
    @justcallmeD90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    I don't think the children actually exist at all they're fake and the children in the pics aren't their children

    • @paulmorris3669
      @paulmorris3669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I agree.

    • @kellykelly2938
      @kellykelly2938 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I also agree, not their kids, just props they rent in my opinion. 🤮

    • @justcallmeD90
      @justcallmeD90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kellykelly2938 🤣😂

  • @Loki-ko2mq
    @Loki-ko2mq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    What happened to the doctor that delivered the baby? Why did she close her office and I assume stopped practicing medicine?

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That is strange, but people do have family and personal issues that cause them to leave a job. Thanks for watching!!

  • @melviadinsmore38
    @melviadinsmore38 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If she had kids, she would want them to be close to the king, but has Charles even met them? There are no kids.

  • @joannahampton5979
    @joannahampton5979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    "awkward" is the perfect word to describe Meghan with any children including her own

  • @ferociousgumby
    @ferociousgumby 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    That very strange photo of "Lilibet" which she released around her birthday just looked extremely odd. Many noticed that she did not appear to have legs. A one-year-old can't fold their legs under them and still balance enough to pose for a shot. Plus we did not see even a hint of knee - she seemed to leave off at the hem of her dress, as if she was levitating! Someone else said she was "sitting on a hedge", but even if that was true, where where her knees? feet? Everything was "off" about this, as is the case with everything to do with their kids. They just don't seem to be parents, and it feels very forced when they wedge in comments about the "children", as if Sunshine Sachs sits down with them every morning and tells them, "OK, folks, it's been a while since you talked about Archie/Lilibet. Think of something to drop in there today to throw people off." Any interactions with Archie are creepy because she seems to be carrying around an inanimate object, a sack of potatoes. WHEN will all this nonsense finally come out? Can they keep this up when they go to school (PRIVATE TUTORING to keep them "safe", of course!). I feel very sorry for kids raised in an aura of suspicion, paranoia and constantly feeling unsafe. A recipe for an anxious, unhappy child who will likely develop serious emotional issues. Worst of all, MM is isolating them the same way she has isolated H and taken him away from everything and everyone he loved. The polo playing seemed like Sunshine Sachs saying: "OK folks, people are starting to say H has no life now. How can we make it look as if he DOES have a life and actually enjoys something?" EVERYTHING is so very contrived and forced, like her nasty white crescent that passes for a smile

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Light as a feather ... stiff as a board.. that's poor Lily levitating like in a fake seance. This is really child abuse for these poor kids if they do exist.

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ferocious Gumby nothing tracks with them as parents. No joy! No outings. All of Santa Barbara has signed NDAs so there's 0 sightings or mentions of the Queen's only grandchildren living in the US for the first time in world history? No IPhone shots? Uh uh. Something's off

  • @morgansimpier7744
    @morgansimpier7744 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Those two kids are going to be bummed when they get older and find out what their parents gave up-they did not think of the kids!! those two raising kids?? yikes!!

  • @mariakyriacou3597
    @mariakyriacou3597 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    As a Brit I don’t care whether they exist or not imo they are not Royal material thanks to their Mother and father keep them in monteshitshow 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧💜💜💜

  • @whitelotus1960
    @whitelotus1960 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Of all the pictures I have seen of them with 'their' children, it looks like neither parent wants to touch or interact with them. Very strange. Looks like posing in a Sears catalogue.

  • @mordeys
    @mordeys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Im still trying to figure out her wearing white/cream dress hours after giving birth. Any one who has giving birth knows that you have essentially a 10-14 day "period" after that. She wouldnt have been able to use a tampon. It had to be a pad or special panties...but i wouldnt risk going in front of millions if ppl in white if i had just given birth....

  • @mariawhite1328
    @mariawhite1328 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They never even tell kid anecdotes.very strange.

  • @sidneybales9062
    @sidneybales9062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes had Suri, they waited nearly 6 weeks to sell a Suri story to People Magazine. It was a HUGE hit. After that photo shoot, Suri was seen out all the time. This is where MM and PH have calculated wrong. They SHOULD have sold each of their children to People (or what ever magazine). They could then trot the kids out every once in a while and call it a day. Now it is just strange as hell and nobody cares. People love seeing kids grow up and it keeps us engaged.

  • @debrjackson7431
    @debrjackson7431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't believe they exsist either. I believe they are either surrogates w/mum's in u.k. where the birth mothers have much more say in custody. So they are borrowed from their surrogate mum's ., or they are not theirs in anyway, just borrowed. Or they are dolls. Or Photoshopped. 1 picture in the reality show was she was carrying Archie who was completely limp. And Lili was sitting above Harry's collar. How is that possible? Plus the weirdest baby bumps ever. Square, flat then falls out if her dress later in the day. Ànd the pics of the beach ball that was supposedly Lili? And the pillow looking bump?
    Too bizarre and unbelievable. She may have gained weight, but she has to keep up the charade to monetize and exploit these invisakids.

  • @carolinenorman6141
    @carolinenorman6141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    They behave so precious and diva like. Apparently their neighbor's were told not to speak to them or look them in the eyes . Shocking pretentious behaviour.

  • @margaretcooper797
    @margaretcooper797 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They are private with their own children but are quite happy to exploit other people’s children,without permission,for their publicity and financial gain.

  • @bramsrockhopper3377
    @bramsrockhopper3377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Weight gain and loss can happen for a hundred reasons, and both can be deliberate or accidental. By itself it is absolutely NO ‘proof’ of pregnancy. Funny how her weight gain never affected her ankles and legs…
    There’s far more evidence that they don’t exist than that they do. Your reliance on the weight gain is a bit odd.
    Just my thoughts and opinions

    • @RomayPM
      @RomayPM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I agree

    • @fionabromby4546
      @fionabromby4546 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      She always gained weight after the babies odd. The weeks after my 3 children’s birth. I started to lose baby weight after my first child I was 22 and went out of hospital in my ordinary size10 dress

    • @annewilkinson9611
      @annewilkinson9611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@fionabromby4546 That's the reason I don't believe it was "baby weight". That picture of her carrying Archie while pregnant she looks slim with a huge bizarrely shaped bump. She also looked slim in the 40x40 video but then she turns up in NY much heavier. I think she did it on purpose to crush the rumours she used a surrogate and probably fishing for sympathy.

    • @robinhall420
      @robinhall420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look at that Christmas card they put out….look how thick Meghan’s legs are….they were never that heavy. Total photoshop..IMO

    • @annewilkinson9611
      @annewilkinson9611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@robinhall420 You're right. Even at her heaviest Meghan doesn't have thick legs. Photoshop.

  • @nothereorthere8686
    @nothereorthere8686 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We've never seen the children, don't think they exist.

  • @ThePHYL
    @ThePHYL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What mother doesn’t want to show off their children….back when Louie was on the balcony with the Queen, holding his ears, Catherine was laughing…it was adorable.

  • @ninagreen1109
    @ninagreen1109 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Their invisible children are holidayig with their invisible mother n grandmother 😡😠

  • @hollyl9151
    @hollyl9151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Bingo!!!! Parent without seeing them as a parent. You are so spot on

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much!! It drives me nuts!

  • @Canuck13
    @Canuck13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Line of success children MUST be seen. Period. Hello from Canada. Love your channel!

  • @M50568
    @M50568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The video of MM and the child struck me. They both are so disconnected, and obviously she is not used to do that reading thing, an every gesture is so awkward. If it's really their child, she doesn't spend decent time with her son. So fake.

  • @susannecurtis9724
    @susannecurtis9724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If King Charles told them that the kids had to live in the UK to be called Prince and Princess, I could see Megain demanding that they pack up and go live there.

  • @DianeV585
    @DianeV585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Those pictures of Lillibet are suspect at best!🇨🇦

  • @Ginag9232
    @Ginag9232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Ginger and Mad Meg are abusive parents keeping them locked up away from family. That's a form of abuse

  • @Katrina-mi2gm
    @Katrina-mi2gm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    The Harkle 's reputation is so low, that even bringing out ' the kids' won't be a magic pill to save it. The general public is much more savvy to their lies and merching shenanigans so results could be either total indifference or even more disdain for them. They shot themselves in a foot with this one, but this is not surprising, considering how often they do it with everything else- pardon the pun, but by now they have no feet to stand on.

    • @RoyalNewsNetwork
      @RoyalNewsNetwork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So true!! They’re saving the children for some sort of payout. Thanks for watching!!

    • @brendadickson1755
      @brendadickson1755 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well they will be looking for actors to play the children, where in America is people that check on children, they are nobodies in USA so start checking, he his not royal, we all know who his Harry’s father, so for goodness sake USA check on them, and do not tell them you are arriving,😈🔥🤮🐍🐀🇨🇦

  • @Chryslers1
    @Chryslers1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They exist but we're just not going to see them until they're ready. Protecting them is fine, the King just needs to do something about it - stop them from being paid. I'm from a Commonwealth country & l don't want to put my money on these two.

  • @gailobrien9380
    @gailobrien9380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    These are two Royal children that I have zero interest in! Meghan and Harry have played so many silly games regarding these kids, that people no longer care!

  • @robinsmarts
    @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    I'm not a photoshop mastermind , but it's so clear the picture of Lily was doctored. No legs or feet and a very odd, unnaturally long arm protruding from her. And that child is an 18 month old at the youngest. Also, the Canadian snap of Archie with her walking and smiling and then suing, is clearly a doll. Walking your dogs, you need your baby in a stroller. If that was a real kid, he'd be screaming bloody murder because babies have no center of gravity and instinctually cry out when they might fall. Furthermore, that pseudo- birthday party at Frogmore never took place IMO. They were long gone back to Cali after the boos. It was just a PR stunt to make Will and Kate look like they snubbed the Sussex tots on Jubilee weekend when no one has time to scratch their noses. Harry knows better. Or does he?

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Oh dear feel a sniffle!!! Sniff 😿.... Sniffle 😢 ... Sniff...my nose was starting to itch.

    • @WMeier-kd8hz
      @WMeier-kd8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      How about no pregnany by M ?

    • @dotregan1506
      @dotregan1506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      No, Harry just does what he's told. There are no children, and the only Lilybet was the one on the balcony.

    • @Susan-vl8ts
      @Susan-vl8ts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Never understood the baby in the carrier WHILE she had two dogs on a leash (which was also strange because my dogs pull me a little to sniff the grass/ground - and those dogs were just walking) - there were 2 bodyguards behind her, why would she chance a dog pulling at her while she has a baby in a carrier?

    • @dotregan1506
      @dotregan1506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Susan-vl8ts Me neither, and I used to carry each of my boys round in a baby carrier, but not when I was out and about with them. Then they were in their respective prams and I certainly would never have taken the risk of walking dogs while carrying them, my motherly instinct would not have taken the risk of being pulled over. Something she obviously doesn't have, because that was not a real baby.

  • @betmo
    @betmo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    folks are even less invested because of the slap in the face to the queen 🤷‍♀️ should not have named her lilibet...i refuse to call her that

    • @Kfox50
      @Kfox50 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why in the world would Meghan want to name her daughter Lilibet if her experience being a member of the royal family made her feel suicidal? Obviously, she only did it to torment the Queen and make money. Terrible people.

  • @malishmalishovic8844
    @malishmalishovic8844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Growing up under a narcissistic mother comes with many unique issues that are hard to explain and even more difficult for kids to navigate through.

  • @bschultz7390
    @bschultz7390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    You’re a delightful presenter of common sense. Thanks for the interesting and upbeat videos.🌻

  • @marm8523
    @marm8523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Producing two redheaded children from a biracial and Ginger is an oddity in itself. Oh we don't want titles for the children, but then she's annoyed because the children don't have titles LOL Pinocchio will never let those children become more important than herself. Gosh forbid they should steal her Limelight.

  • @dianemacfie-loucks6392
    @dianemacfie-loucks6392 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Didn’t MM’s brother sayin a letter to not let her near children… or something like that? She doesn’t look like a good mother, I bet the Nannie’s are looking after them. I’m actually surprised that Harry isn’t all over the kids he seemed to always love kids. Maybe they take the attention away from her. I don’t think they should have titles and Lilly wasn’t even born in the UK.

  • @lucyroberts9226
    @lucyroberts9226 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm loving the way you have highlighted both sets of royals and there parenting

  • @janekelly8778
    @janekelly8778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    It’s like the “ boy in the bubble “ 🤣🤣. Watching now

  • @maryevelyncoker5917
    @maryevelyncoker5917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You have to wonder why! Their faces will not change security issues?

  • @jeanabercrombie5065
    @jeanabercrombie5065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Love your posts, but please stop referring to the invisible daughter, as Lilibet, it is wrong what they did by using that very special name given to the Queen, by her father, and only her father and her late husband used that term of endearment to her.
    So can you please just call her lili, and not Lilibet Diana.

    • @lindaodd9681
      @lindaodd9681 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Absolutely my sentiments spot on ! It was a disgusting trick they played on the Queen. To use her most intimate private personal name. Yes call her Lili - if she even exists. Nothing would surprise me with this duplicitous vile couple. 😡 Long live our beloved Queen 💕🇬🇧

    • @robinsmarts
      @robinsmarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Jean is right. Lilibet was supposed to be Lily. Calling her Lilibet plays into the narc revenge and disrespecting HM. Betty Di is cute, right???

    • @PS_testing321...
      @PS_testing321... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I have to say, I agree with RNN on the names. They chose to go rouge with the names and they are silly. Princes and Princesses should have traditional names connected to the family. And an upbringing connected to the family, not fueled by a woman who hates the royal family. She has done her children in with poor decisions on their part.

    • @AXCat-kh6vg
      @AXCat-kh6vg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Or better yet, just refer to her as the daughter.

    • @afreeman63
      @afreeman63 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      By her grandfather and I agree it really sticks in my craw.

  • @JudyMenzel7
    @JudyMenzel7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where are MM and PH since they returned to the US after the Queens funeral?

  • @HIGHLANDER_ONLY_ONE
    @HIGHLANDER_ONLY_ONE 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    ❌If Harry and his wife are complaining about their bad parents, wait until their kids grow up, and tell us ALL about how ISOLATED they grew up to be, and how SCEWY FBT parents were. There's NOTHING Harry and his wife could do about it!!! I hope I live that long to see it...❌

    • @Khemani_RL
      @Khemani_RL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol how do you know they are isolated? Just because they chose to protect the privacy of their children by rarely releasing photos doesn’t mean they are isolated. You don’t know wether or not Archie has friends from nursery/kindergarten. Harry and Meghan moved to California to start a new life as a family with their children. Starting a new life doesn’t make your children isolated

  • @jeandesouza5377
    @jeandesouza5377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When they said...they don't want the public to know, the birth day or whatever is because....HMM knew that the baby is not theirs. It's not about keeping the "kids" away from the public..."kids" don't exists