ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Dr. Colin Wright is an evolutionary biology Ph.D., Manhattan Institute Fellow, Academic Advisor for the Society for Evidence Based Gender Medicine, and a member of Genspect’s new think tank, The Killarney Group. Wright began writing publicly about issues of sex and gender in 2018. His articles have been published in the Wall Street Journal, The Times, New York Post,
Newsweek, City Journal, Quillette, and other major news outlets, as well as peer-reviewed journals and book chapters. He has been a guest on many popular TV shows and podcasts, such as The Joe Rogan Experience, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Triggernometry, and others.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this video are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Genspect or its affiliates. While Genspect advocates for free speech and open dialogue, the content here represents individual perspectives. For more information on Genspect's position, please visit our website at genspect.org/o....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please subscribe, comment, like and share!
Support our work: genspect.org/d...
Follow us on Social Media:
X: / genspect
Facebook: / genspect
Instagram: / genspectinternational
TH-cam: / @genspect
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#genspectbiggerpicture #timesupwpath #GenspectDenver
The new sex/gender thing is madness, it's mass hysteria of some sort.
Nope, it's scientific discovery. Like germs, and gas, and atoms there is always a few that just don't have the capacity to understand it. That's OK cuz all that stuff still functions despite your lack of awareness and knowledge, just like gender
I think it's more of a population physiological response. We may be approaching critical mass terms of population and thus our minds are reacting by going down paths that will lead to less population growth or more population decline. The biggest question is whether this is natural or engineered?
@asandax6 my guy I swear to God you're in another post whining about migrants and how we can't afford to take care of Americans how can we take care of migrants but then you're also here complaining about "low population"? We have so much land and so much resources being stolen and hidden away by the rich elites and instead you're focusing on someone wanting to wear a dress more often or be treated slightly differently than everybody else (something we do anyway) I wonder if THAT is intentional (it is) keep the low IQ people busy hating the ones they don't understand so the rich can keep harvesting you like a crop. It's not "new" you're just uneducated 🤷♀️ gender and sex aren't even the same thing and never were yall just are too embarrassed to say "sex" for fear God will smite you down where you stand. Don't believe me? Cuz you never bothered to even look the definitions up here they are
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time.
Sex is the trait that determines whether a sexually reproducing organism produces male or female gametes.
Now tell me why they have 2 different definitions if they are the same things? Because they aren't 🤷♀️ identifying as female, doesn't mean you can't have kids, identifying as non binary, doesn't mean your genitals fall off. Which logically would mean? Yes,they can still all have children. What's more insane is how YOU can be allowed to have children but lack the ability to understand basic word definitions that take about 10 seconds total for both to find with today's technology
@@asandax6 Yes, it's political now. Before it was just about "acceptance". Now you have to kowtow to the pronoun people in order to force acknowledgement of something that isn't true. A man CANNOT become a woman, no matter how much makeup he puts on.
@@asandax6 Gay people have always been with us. Throughout most of history they were asking for "equal rights". Now they want "special privileges.
I'm an academic biologist nearing retirement. We've been here before, many times. Every few years a subset of scientists, doctors, therapists, and academics goes nuts for a while, thinking they are the new civil rights or gay rights movement. This time it's harder to have them see how mad they are, due to the internet, the corruption of schools of education, and the sinister emotional blackmail played especially on trans parents (parents of "trans") with the hideous suicide narrative. Also, now, academic journals are corrupt (money grabbing) and have sold out. It takes ordinary people, "contrarian" journalists, and a gathering groundswell to dowse the conflagration.
count this ordinary person in. Thanks for this.
The normalisation of the abnormal, see gay, was also part of this nuts past.
Colins mentioned females producing gamete eggs and males producing gamete sperm one of the biggest rebuttal to binary is not all females produce eggs and not all males produce sperm. Therefore, how are they placed as binary male or female if they don’t produce gametes.
@@mystic22g4in biology it is difficult to find much that is black and white, but it is reasonable and useful to define the bell curves and define “normal.” At some point, you can bring it to evolutionary terms when thinking about normal such as asking the questions, what helps the critter survive and what allows the species to successfully propagate? Oddities occur all the time for whatever disorder in whatever species. Cats and dogs get epilepsy too. At what point does it prevent the critter from surviving into reproductive years and at what point does it reduce the chances for reproductive success? We can define normal using the negative criteria or failure to survive and reproduce. Of course, in humans this is a little more complex. We can fail to reproduce but non-reproducing humans continue to play important roles in human societies and aid others in reproducing and helping to raise, protect, or simply inspire the young of other parents. While intersex people exist, that doesn’t mean that they will reproduce (chances are they will not), nor does it even mean they will survive (e.g., Turner’s syndrome).
What you are referring to is the myth of essentialism, that somehow there is a Platonic essence built into us that is either male or female. Many times, this essentialism is driven by religious dogma. That is another discussion to have, but that is not a biological discussion.
@@NicoleTedesco I understand that when it comes to humans there is not always genetic or biological conformity which is why birth defects and disorders of sex development exists. However if male and female is strictly based gametes how do we define those who don’t produce gametes yet they primarily develop as male or female .
I don’t believe there exists a spectrum of sexes and consider Swyer individuals as not true males chromosomes due to having a mutated or missing SRY gene .
Remember "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."Voltaire? Cutting up your children for no good reason, seems to me an atrocity.
Transitioning children should be classified as a criminal offense punishable by a lengthy prison term because it is severe child abuse.
Flat earthers think it is absurd to believe the world turns on its axis and goes round the sun. After all common sense would tell you that that is clearly not true! Damn, we let so many people convince us of absurdities. The fact that so many people can't see a reactionary fascistic conspiracy when it is shoved in their face makes me fear for the human race.
Oh it is
Excellent point
@@conillet Excellent point? Misusing a quote to stir up hatred toward a vulnerable community? There is a passage in Mein Kampf that does this exact same thing, only they are talking about the "J*wish Media". It is shameful bog standard reactionary moral panic.
It's like saying that if one in a billion is born with one arm, it's not clear whether or not having two arms is normal. "Armed-ness" is a spectrum.
LOL😂
That's true. The whole movement is about normalizing the outliers. Everybody want to be identically significant, no matter how much reality you have to ignore to get there.
The spectrum you speak of is called “ the ArmY “
@@jerrylev59 I've heard such pathetic arguments over and over again! In which statistical anomalies and outliers becomes the "norm", while the norms are "invalidated" by the anomalies...
Just another abuse of statistics in order to push an argument who's foundations are incredibly weak! Anyway, this is doomed to fail! So long as people keep themselves intellectually rigorous, by maintaining critical thinking and NOT allowing people to emotionally manipulate them!
Around the age of 4 I wanted to be a boy. It made sense, I was constantly told,girls don't play with cars, don't fight( although I needed to protect myself from bullies) , had to wear dresses even though I was cold all the time, can't climb trees or monkey bars, etc, hated the smells in the hair salon and wanted to get my hair cut in the barber shop( that had a cool horse chair for kids). I told everyone I was a boy. Today I would have been transitioned.
I grew up playing with both boys and girls, with dolls and legos, running, jumping, fighting, wearing pants when going outside to play. I never realized there are people stuck in the 60s, where you can't do this or that because of your sex/gender until I grew up.
Until you were 11 or so, “being transitioned” would just have meant being allowed to do the things you mention doing or wanting to do in your comment, and going by a different name and pronouns if you wanted. Going further than those reversible steps would have required your ongoing desire to do so, along with the approval of a mental health professional and a doctor.
@@altruisticflower9627I know at least one person who just got hormones from Planned Parenthood so the whole gatekeeping by professionals is no longer a true statement
@@dustinmartin2369 The comment I responded to was about pediatric transition; what is Planned Parenthood’s minimum age for informed-consent HRT?
@@altruisticflower9627 The problem is that it doesn't go away. I can attest as a tomboy myself, I can tell you that it doesn't go away. You like what you like. I didn't grow out of my tomboy phase until I was 18 or 19 years old. I still haven't completely gone away from it, and I'm now 40.
If you add autism to the mix, then on top of being a tomboy, you also now have social issues relating to peers. And you're prone to suggestion.
Good on you mate for standing up to this madness. It`s in Australia too. Simply crap
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz Does to me matey
The Australian government forces gender theory into primary schools under the guise of anti bullying programs. Kids are forced to engage and sit through it for 2 hours a week from prep to Yr 10
Yea, because anything that falls outside of your own limited view of how reality works has got to be madness hasn't it? We are presented with a phenomenon here - is it actually smart just to dismiss it as so much nonsense? Is that the scientific approach? Or is it what reactionary bigots do in the name of their twisted notion of what constitutes the moral order? What does history tell us?
There isn't a spectrum of gametes, so there isn't a spectrum of sexes. The fact that we have the term 'intersex' means that it's between the defined sexes. If sex is a spectrum then there is no such thing as intersex. Great talk, thank you 💯💯
People with "Intersex conditions" AREN'T"between the sexes". EVERY person with EVERY one of the various "intersex conditions" (which is a loose, subjective umbrella-term; Ask different doctors, and you'll get a diferent specific list of what is/isn't "an intersex condition") is either a female, or a male, just like every person, hell every MAMMAL, is either female, or male. No "in between". No "third option".
People with "intersex conditions" (or more accurately, "DSDs", "Disorders of sexual development"), are just ATYPICAL females, or ATYPICAL males, with maybe a genital deformity, or hormonal, or chromosomal abnormality... But NONE of these make that person "less female/male", any more than missing a toe makes you "less bipedal".
The way sexual reproduction works, sex CAN ONLY be a binary; a strict, universal binary. EVERY person (also individual mammal, every bird, most vertebrates, most insects, even many plants) have exactly ONE large gamete-having female parent, and ONE small gamete-having male parent. No exceptions.
"Intersex condition" or not, no male is "more male" than any other male. No female is "more female" than any other female.
We are ALL just either 100% female. Or 100% female. (Regardless of whether or not we have an intersex condition, or any other medical issue)
The proponents say that gender is on a spectrum. The word gender has been hijacked and redefined as something akin to a "feeling" or "personality", a social construct. How they get to the stage of dangerous hormones and surgeries is a mystery to me. It's all a bunch of codswallop.
Weird, that in the Torah (a book over 2 thousand years old) confirms that trans people existed and even then they comprehended this very simple topic
Good to know. It’s funny to see Matt Walsh on the subject. He literally seethes in contempt at the idea of a man in panties. @@hhlptf
@hhlptf Interesting. I've seen videos talking about cultures falling in the past when the people on a large scale start obsessing about sex. Douglas Murray mentions this as does well a known femenist.
Dr. Wright is an outstanding biologist. Thank you for hosting him and posting this presentation.
🙏
The most revered scientists are those who were just brave enough to state the truth in the face of popular lies.
@@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6tt Alright, how about her?
th-cam.com/video/5SVbN6tIySc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=o01__5xwTqokHE1L
@@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6tt This is the problem with religion: no evidence will ever be good enough to dissuade the true believer.
@@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6tt Please give some substance behind your accusations, otherwise it's hard to take you seriously
THANK YOU FOR THIS CRUCIAL TALK ! WE NEED SO MUCH MORE, URGENTLY !
This was an excellent presentation but at the same time I feel like I watched a presentation on why the Earth isn't flat or only 6000 yrs old.
What other basic information will we need to defend next?
😂😂😂😂😂 best comment I’ve read so far! 🏆
I thought of this the other day ....🤷🏼♀️😳😬😉🤷🏼♀️
The fact that it's wrong to have sex with children is the one that is raising its hideous monstrosity of a head right now. We are being told that we must accept that pedophilia is simply what some people's sexuality is, & we must affirm it, or we're being mean to the poor chomos.
Personally, I believe in the wood chipper approach.
@@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6ttok groomer
Food. You don't need food, just light and the right breathing method. Breatharians or whatever they are called.
Don't laugh, someone believing in this already died.
Such a clear explanation. Thank you. I now have what I need to explain this to my children.
"Sperg or a spegg." 🤣 🐿
The bottom is, there is a ton of money to be made off of confused children and mentally distressed adults. $100,000 for surgeries, plus life long dependence on powerful drug, typically a $million over a lifetime, if they start with a child.
Health insurance, notably “Obamacare” in the U.S. is what’s driving this.
This is what happens when the medical community follows politics instead of science.
Absolutely blows my mind we're having this conversation.
No this is what happens when the medical community follows science and ignores politics and religious dogma
The medical doctor recognizes that this is a hermaphrodite They are intersex They are neither male nor female historically the doctor would either mutilate or kill them
This is doctors being doctors this is doctors doing their job
This biologist is a disgrace he has violated his oath to science in order to support his religious dogma that makes him a bad scientist not a good one you just think he's a good one because you believe you're really just dogma and he supports you.
Loved the "Sperg" and "Spegg"hypothetical gamete examples! Very funny, and clearly debunks the notion of "intersex" actually constituting a real category of sex in humans.
Lol, sperg, I thought that was a slur. Well, still fits.
Weird that sex and gender are different yall are just patting yourselves on the back for misunderstanding the argument to begin with and it's actually hilarious
@@hhlptfGender and sex are the same thing.
@smithsmith1956 Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men, and gender diverse people.
You aren't just wrong, you're lazy for not taking 5 seconds to google words definitions.
@@hhlptf Nope. That's the new age definition. The social engineering. And it was started by a journalist of all people. Gender=sex. Period. Spit out the Kool aid.
I've been thinking about Occam's razor and the earth centered model with this madness. Excellent presentation and a wonderful call for sanity!
You wouldn't understand sanity or Occam's razor if it smacked you in the face
Great Work ♥
sex redefined is actually a pretty accurate description of what they are doing, so the title of the article was honest, probably not much of the rest, though.
Sounds like they are bringing in a lot of things that used to be secondary characteristics or part of what they were calling gender, like someone's identity or how they behave. Gender and sex are no longer referring to different aspects of a person, they've combined the two. Anything to make their ideas more convoluted.
Conference organisers. Next time LET THE SPEAKER CONTROL THE SLIDE PROGRESSION!!!
One word: DEPOPULATION. 👿🌍💔
yep!
This is why I say, if someone is after this excellent explanation still on that wagon of craziness, their are not going to get well any time soon. Just leave them on that wagon of non-binary nonsense.
Noone wants to break anything.
That sex is bimodal...is simply a reality
The 130 million intersex people looking at your comment and going huh I read this idiot's comment but somehow I still exist
Sex is NOT “Assigned” at birth……. PERIOD. SEX is a physiological trait. Anything else is psychological and needs to be treated as such.
Which “Heather” is he talking about and where is her video? Thanks!
Probably Heather Heying, wife to Bret Weinstein. She too is an evolutionary Biologist. 🐿
Probably Heather Heying
Thanks! When I looked around I saw it was probably her!
28:33 28:36
Heather Heying. Her lecture is on this channel.
I'm glad you explained why sex determination systems like chromosomes cannot be used as arguments for binary sex.
12 sexes! Like the hours on the dial 😂 !
- "What are you?"
- Half past three...
😂😂
In the Torah (the oldest written book in Judaism that's been around for 2000 years) they recognize trans people, imagine not getting something that people using clay bowls understood
@@hhlptf not everyone is religious. You keep commenting about a religion. This is science, not religion.
@lornocford6482 and I'm showing you that despite the common drivel spouted by everyone trans people have existed. Great, doesn't matter that the religion isn't real the Talmud was written and inside it contains trans people. Now we've established that yes, trans people are real and have existed for thousands of years this isn't a "new trad". Now add in the science that sex and gender are different. Proof you're asking for? If the NUMEROUS scientists (and the endless amounts of explanation on google) won't do it for you. Ask yourself how many things you do day to day that are directly because you have a specific set of genitals between your legs. Then ask yourself how any of what you do is different than what the opposite genetic sex does? That establishes that there is no difference in 99% of bodily function and daily activities that's directly related to the specific XX and XY chromosomes. So if 99% of everything you do isn't controlled by your DNA and sex, then what do you get your personality from? Does having a specific set of genitals mean the person will always act the same way? No, we find that culture, nature,school, media all influence you and each person differently. So your behaviour is now established as not having anything to do with your genitals, and we've established trans people exist and have existed for thousands of years. Now here comes the part yall can't seem to get. We've established that behaviour ("manly" or "feminine") have no actual description, because every society is completely different. That establishes that what is decided as "manly" and "feminine" (pink used to be for boys and blue for girls now it's reversed perfect example) is completely made up. So just stop forcing your ideals of what men and women should or shouldn't do on everyone and realize that every single person is a combination of different "manly" and "feminine" behaviours. Now if only there was a way to narrow down which behaviours you identify with most.... that's gender. The reason there are so many genders is literally just how specific do you want to get. You could say "male" because in your mind you do alot of male things. You could say "genderfluid" because you like both "male" and "female" things. But the key thing to note here is that society tells us what "male" and "female" behaviors are. And since society changes.... that means no behaviour is truly male or female as both can do both. Hope that helps. Next time just Google it and read the descriptions of actual scientists who study this, and not me because they'll go into alot more detail than what I can remember from the hundreds of studies I've read concerning this very topic. You should try to read at least 2 before you pretend you know anything about it though
@@hhlptf No, they don't. The earliest parts of the Torah are closer to 4000 years old, and says nothing about trans people or other gender diverse people. The Rabbinic writings that discuss those we would now call intersex people as well as those through violence or accident have their genitals cut off or otherwise mutilated is about 2000 years old based on fragments we have though the oldest complete version we have is around 1800 years old. The writings specifically discusses them as to their obligation to the law and community, and within that ruled that the four other groups mentioned were not distinct sexes, but variations of male and female. There is nothing about the cultural concept of gender identity in any of the texts classical Jewish texts, the concept of personal identity as an innate constant just didn't culturally exist and the gender systems of the time were about responsibility, not personal perceptions.
It's been less than 20 years since the first Reform Rabbi in California said these Rabbinic writings are gender identities and transgender people. It's not a scholarly nor typical Jewish view on it and as the Reform denomination neither hold the Rabbinical writings like the Talmud as sacred nor binding on anyone - they've fought for over a century to have those texts abolished from the faith - so while some people like this reading, it has little relevancy to Judaism or the understanding of those texts.
If they could just show me the third gamete, I'd believe them
I still can’t get over the fact that Alex Jones was right about this-“turning the frogs gay”, LOL. I never looked down on Alex Jones like so many others did, but I DID think his claim about the frogs was hyperbolic, at best. I thought he was just being bombastic. But no…not so much.
Sanity affirmation is a lovely way to put it. It is frightening that we need such a thing in government, considering.
I’ve been encountering this anti-scientific nonsense since the Great Awokening of 2015. Thank you, Colin for debunking it.
I am studying the reality of sex spectrum and the reality of speggs (i use amicroscope and the science of speggstroscopy)
Anything with the word "deconstruction" in the title is probably anti-scientific.
I wrote a lot and then decided to shorten it to this: go have a listen to what "they" are actually saying - it's not what Dr Colin Wright is telling you.
Thank you for your very clear, and obvious explanations!! I really liked it. I feel empowered. So I am not😊😊 crazy....
Personality is a spectrum, gender is not. Such a basic principle.
This talk provides a fascinating exploration into the concept of biological sex and its fundamental binary nature. The speaker delves into the intricate details of sex determination, highlighting the distinct reproductive strategies of males and females based on gamete production. By elucidating the role of chromosomes and secondary sex characteristics, the talk sheds light on why the binary classification of sex remains a cornerstone in biological sciences.
people don't like to fight about it
I wonder if there is a link between people who develop gender dysphoria and kids who play role playing games where they can customise their characters and essentially choose their identities.
If ANYONE looked more like "he'd" transitioned, we couldn't have got better from central casting.
Don't doubt your sanity. There are 2. Only 2..
Okay, I'm trying to learn more about this topic and am discussing with a guy that is bringing up a person with xx chromosomes and male genitalia. The experts say this individual is infertile, how does this equate into identifying sex by gametes or the ability to either produce sperm or eggs?
The ethics around how to treat intersex people have progressed in recent years. There was a time when children were operated on to make their genitalia look the nearest to male or female. That didn't necessarily match with how they felt as they grew up. It also caused them pain and loss of sexual sensitivity. Nowadays, intersex people are left with body autonomy. They decided when they're adults if they want any body modifications. Often, they choose to accept their body as it is and only address anomalies that cause health problems. Your friend's child will decide for themselves if they are male or female.
@@lornocford6482yes and the intersex are the only people who can truly decide that. No one else can.
31:41 follow the money. Start with the Pritsger family. Jennifer Bilec has studied this very question. Btw both of those names are intentionally spelled wrong.
I think you could argue a trinary: you produce eggs, you produce sperm, or you produce neither.
I love Colin and I loved his talk. Simple, eloquent, entertaining common sense! More of this please! Thank you genspect for all the work you’re doing.
Thanks
Sex is established shortly after conception , is visualized at birth or sooner w ultrasound. It is not assigned. You can’t assign (choose for) a gender. “Brain sex” is mental and that’s fine but that falls into gender dysmorphia which is a mental issue. I can think I’m a cat all
I want but the reality is I’m still a human being. I can’t wear ears and a tail and expect people to accept me as an actual cat.
I suspect for most of us this is like wandering around a lunatic asylum and finally hearing someone talking rationally. The more voices the better. Strength in numbers.
Look what happened to Jordan Peterson.
@@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6tt And what would those be ?
@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6tt you believe in compelled speach. That's just pure lunacy. Peterson is correct on this.
@@dalebaker3799What about him he seems to be doing fine.
@@PoliticalTheatreTV-eu6ttIdiotic? common sense you mean.
Remember, we're all here because of that binary. Let them try to refute that.
Exactly!
Who..is trying to refute that? That isn't a point made by anyone, you just made a point and said it is something "they" are against.
You sound stupid. Make an actually intelligent argument.
Typical "breeder" rationalization! 😆(I'm joking)
Yah, that them. Weirdly, that dopey attempt at profundity doesn't account for biological reality however.
Did youtube delete my comment? Also no one refutes that, why are you making up an argument that is obviously dumb to argue against...that's sad.
The idea that sex is a spectrum is absolute nonsense, (and they know it). Yet this needs to be repeated and repeated and repeated........It's the only thing we can do to fight this lunacy.
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz Sexual preference perhaps, but not gender, male or female that's it
@@pluijm2 Sex or gender? Why slide between the two as if there were the same? Yet everyone does this! Male and female are the adjectives that describe sex. Those that describe gender are masculine and feminine. Ask yourself what nouns attach to those adjectives.
@@fredneecher1746 That's great and all, but that doesn't mean that one can pick and choose gender the way woke wants it to be. Gender is not a spectrum either. Basicly it's the same thing as sex,
"repeated and repeated and repeated"
Yep. This is how cults operate. Instead of actually rationalising their positions, they repeat them over and over again, until everyone inside the group believes it and those who don't have been shunned. This is how they keep you from questioning the doctrine. It's a thought-stopping technique; they're used by nearly every high-control group to some extent.
@@TheDarkWiiPlayer I had the exact same thought as you! Repeating things over and over again until everyone believes it is brainwashing.
Sex is observed at birth, not assigned.
It's a Intersex term after an infant's genital mutation.
Yeah that's true, good thing it's gender they are changing not sex. Google definitions of words 5 seconds before replying
I was assigned female at birth. By God.
@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole God came down and told everyone you were female? That's wild my guy, did your parents take pictures or just too awestruck by gods presence?
Wild that there's a difference between genetics and gender. Almost like dna is totally different than how humans perceive reality
I must be a genius. I figured out there were 2 sexes when I was just 3 or 4 years old
Imagine how much more difficult it would have been if everyone around you was taking weird hormones, though.
Me too, from a fellow genius.
My son is four, yeah he pretty much has that one figured out.
@@brittybee6615or get a date with a "woman" to learn its a male....... really its an "abomination"!
No, that only shows you were not ivy league educated. 😂
Trans idealogy is a secular religion/cult
The transphobic hate cult is a religious-based western Talibanic form of theofascism.
Too right. Its a cult worse than Scientology!!!
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz it's a fact.
Not really, Christian god is non-binary, after all. In fact, god has multiple personalities, sometimes he thinks he's Jesus, sometimes Mary and sometimes "god". Sounds trans to me.
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz Which one?
‘The Issue’ is never really ‘The Issue’.
‘The Issue’ is always the Revolution.
Less Marxist sympathizers in this comments section then in James'. Lol... 🐿
Thank you, understanding this is foundational. To dismiss the arguments for multisex as delusional is to miss the point; to miss the purpose. They gladly sacrifice reason for the Revolution. This is why they can say nonsense with a straight face. Exhibit one, the “scientific study” that ends with a “call to arms” in a scientific journal. Nature!
Exhibit 2 is What is reasonable end state of a multisex-spectrum world? For human society, this is extinction. How could such a society reach a 2.1 offspring per binary woman ratio which is minimum to sustain a population. The math doesn’t work if 1/2? Of the biological woman are too much on the male spectrum side y
To have children.
Took the words out of my mouth.
Amen. Too many people get caught up in the emotion of this tryannnical thinking and not enough about who gains from all this rubbish. People quickly say it's about money. Well, aren't there easier ways to make money? I'm with you. This is about a complete upending of society for the purposes of mass control. A revolution.
so all this anti-trans and maga chud frenzy is just a smoke screen for a theocratic revolution? Makes sense.
I come here seeking sanity. Thanks Colin.
No you don't you come here seeking confirmation of your religious insanity of your religious delusions you want confirmation of what you believe and that's it that's what you want.
I’m a physiologist, my entire life has been based on using the bedrock of scientific inquiry for answering questions, even seemingly mundane ones because it’s the most reliable method we have. Now that bedrock has been infiltrated with clay and that part has turned from data focus to emotional focus. I hope I’m wrong in my opinion that there is an insidious plan to burn down everything out of spite simply because they imagine they feel powerless in the current paradigm. And while science has often informed political decisions in history, I can’t find a time when a fake version of it has been forged and then used as a political dragnet. I’m pushing sixty and it breaks my heart to see our species come so far with science, human/animal rights and enlightenment in general only to see the West stand to lose it all by the time I’m Im ash. Thank you for standing up for science. Heather and Brett are heroes in my opinion.
Fake science was often used in the civil war, against the idea of evolution, and of course in Nazi Germany.
In many cases, this fake science was used to oppress others. I'm not sure exactly how expanding our definitions in science is particularly harmful to anyone. For example, the geocentric model is harmful because it obfuscates a relatively simple idea. It's not explicitly wrong, as it's all a reference plane. The Bohr model of the atom is the opposite: it's very incorrect, but it simplifies a much more complex situation.
Sex as defined by Dr. Wright can't be 1 bit though. It has to be 2 bits (at least, for each type of gamete). It is functionally the same as blood type. In blood, you produce A or B antigens or neither, resulting in 4 fundamental blood types (ignore RH). This is really basic math.
I think it's more important socially and culturally to observe phenotypes rather than genotypes. Science (and its usefulness to society) needs to look at both genotypes and phenotypes wholistically rather than focusing entirely genotypically like it seems Dr. Wright is suggesting.
Amen - this is a much larger thing than just this gender inversion. This is a human global spiritual attack that only will have a spiritual solution to it. This is all described in te Bible - revelation and other prophetic sections. There are a few who understand and are reporting about this - but the masses are asleep, distracted and deceived.
Its about the narrative and agenda of the globalists that want absolute control to serve their own needs at the detriment of the majority.
You are full of crap. This isn't standing up for science. It is standard reactionary moral panic and has nothing to do with the actual practice scientific inquiry. What questions have you asked about the trans experience. I too am in my 60s! Thank god I didn't carry all that was worst about the times I grew up in.
Wouldn't a psychologist know this has been happening for thousands of years. Look at indigenous culture for example. I'm no psychologists, though have an interest and took psych 101 and criminal psychology for kicks but I am aware of my indigenous past stories of two spirited people too. Just because we can medically do something doesn't mean we should. Seem a lot of this could more about making money off this in drugs and surgeries in many cases. I'd just want to know for sure that people are talked into going meds and getting surgeries to increase profits. If that's the case someone wants do that I consider the same and other body modifications people do for what ever reason they do it.
It’s hard to believe that delusional has become so widespread throughout society today. How on earth did this happed to get so bad in less than a decade?
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz It’s the other way around, your delusional ramblings are the ones that don’t count.
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz Hahaha that’s hilarious, “current research” done by ideologically captured organisations. Absolutely no research needs to be done whatsoever, it’s so obviously ridiculous that all I do now is laugh at all this nonsense. It’s hard to even comprehend how detached from reality this entire movement is.
Gender identity research ist 0% science and 100% ideology.
@trinitybassguitar-ru6dz Stop bullying people through the whole comment section.
Because normal people are busy with real work and taking care of their babies and elderly family members. There is a lot of funds being taken ba ygenerdaga in some western universities, and some queer men want early sexual emancipation of the children of other people, many same-sex couples who want children and cannot together have biological children need other people's babies and demand any man can be a mother to justify taking a baby from his or her mother...
I’m Gen Z, 22, and Male. If you would’ve told me 10 years ago that in some parts of the world my generation was being indoctrinated with pseudoscientific theories about the “reality” of Sex/Gender, I would’ve never believed you. Hell, I wouldn’t have even understood you! Even as a child, it was apparent to me that there can only be two sexes, but yet here we are. I sincerely hope that one day we are able to extinguish the identity politic lunacy that has been perpetrated by our governments and academia in the last decade. If we don’t fight and stand for the truth now, I don’t see a world where my children will be able to distinguish what is real versus what is fake!
Gen z 25 male and in the same boat. It's a clown show but I believe we'll have the last laugh.
I think once governments wake up to the general economic collapse, due to population decline, all these crazy things will go away in a great hurry. I just can't see voters voting for a politician who supports closing a soup kitchen, or homeless shelter, because a few kids need gender affirming care.
So trans people don't exist?
How about this is the actual goal?
All that fake "progressive" BS we see now comes straight from these powercenters.
@@Pugh.Pugh.BarneyMcGrew
I keep telling people to stop worrying about your generation. I see a lot of young folks getting pissed off. It warms the cockles of my heart.
I always laugh at the gender ideologues and ask them to tell me the name of the scientist who won the Nobel Prize in science for discovering that sex is a spectrum. Nobody has ever been able to give me a name. They never will either.
Don't bet too much. If i remember correctly, the Nobel prize for medicine recently went to the developers of a deadly bioweapon.
Just wait they'll probably do it soon
Wait till a few of the loons get on the Nobel Prize board!!
What does it say about our society/culture, that there need to be expert lectures explaining what is the sex binary?🙈🤔🤷♀️
Love your monkey emoji! 😂😂😂 How many of our ape cousins approach each other with, “Uh, are you male or female or something else?” Or any other mammals, for that matter. 🤦🏻♀️ Some people have just gone… 😂😂😂😂😂
@@pamelaroyce5285 I was literally explaining to someone yesterday that 6-month-olds have been proven to begin to differentiate male and female faces. (As part of the old, you can never ever spot a trans identified male, silliness)
Ppl always get annoyed at my source for that because it's actually about how they can differentiate different ape faces at an incredibly young age and then specialize in humans and as adults we can't differentiate ape faces well. It's also 22 years old.
Their response is always, I'm not reading that it's too long, therefore I disagree with you. I feel like the correct response should be, well obviously they can differentiate a bit between male and female, we all can but what's this curious stuff about monkeys? What's that, they can hear sounds we can't too?
I find these ideologues to be characterized by a distinct lack of curiosity, an inability to sit down, focus and read and a preference to live in a childish make believe bubble rather than leave the comfort zone of their keyboard.
@@robertmarshall2502 I’d be interested in that study, if you care to post the title, author and journal or publisher here. I will acknowledge having made a note of it so that you can delete it if you want to in order to fend off spurious attacks.
@@pamelaroyce5285
Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?
Olivier Pascalis et al. Science. 2002.
Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants
It's one of these two. I've forgotten which because the trans ideologues never read anything you give them so I could make up titles and they'd never know
@@robertmarshall2502 thank you. I might do a deep dive on this, but I have no doubts about its validity. I also suspect that we humans do detect different pheromones even though we are not conscious of doing so. I once entered a women’s restroom for the actors at a studio before the taping of a show and immediately noticed a man in a wig standing at the counter, using a curling iron on his long golden tresses. I stuffed down my feelings and went into a stall because I really could not have waited. Came out and had to stand next to him to wash my hands. I felt awkward because I couldn’t help looking at his reflection to take in the reality of a man in a women’s space. So I commented, truthfully, that I never could get the hang of curling irons. He said he’s a hairdresser, which explained his skillfulness. I’m not sure it was his physique that tipped me off when I first walked in. I think men simply smell different. But it isn’t a strong *odor*; not that kind of smell. I suspect it is subtle, like pheromones, and men have a high note of testosterone. I could be wrong, but I think it’s worth exploring. I have made a screenshot of the titles you provided, so if you want to delete your comment to avoid endless naysayers attacking you, feel free to do so. Of course, you can also simply turn off notifications for this thread. Thanks again for the info.
Thank you Dr. Wright, excellent presentation 👏👏👏
The craziness has been going on for a while, and it's probably heading to such an extreme that hopefully the pendulum will soon start to swing towards a more sensible reality.
I remember about ten years ago talking to a gay person who also was an administrator in a Facebook group for vegetarians. I don't know how we got to talking about sex and gender identity, but I did mention that some people regret transitioning their bodies, just as a matter of fact. I was not being the slightest disrespectful or impolite, but that statement was enough for this person to call me a transphobic and block me from this group that had a focus on a completely different subject. At that point I realised that there were some serious mental imbalances going on in some people. Nobody dared to publically contradict what the person did, but some people contacted me privately and mentioned how unfair it was.
They can't stand to hear facts. You can see it in everything they do
@@daviru02 Hes not a typical gay person. The marjority are as fed up with this nonsense as everyone else
Because you are a transphobe what are the reason could you have to bring that up to a gay person some people regret the changes they made? The obvious implication of you mentioning that is that they never should have changed to begin with but the idea of changing is wrong and they learn their lesson because they now regret it how else would you expect a person like that to interpret that statement?
No one ever talks about the hormone disrupting chemicals that are being ingested in huge amounts via processed foods and skin care/hygiene products. It’s no wonder people feel they are in the wrong body.
Pesticides, toxic chemicals castrating pests, grow toxic food in toxic soil, ingest, and viola...no one knows their sex.
In everyone's municipal drinking water there's a ton of hormones from contraceptive pills
And now there are BPAs in our leggings. If you let those tight pants touch your junk, your genitalia get messed with.
It doesn't matter what the cause is. Our sexual makeup is determined by our chemical evolution. We are the same human being playing different sexual roles.
People talk about it all the time. You sleeping?
Excellent talk. Sad that we need this talk.
Calling what they do “gender affirming care” is like calling binocular enucleation “vision affirming care.”
Here's how we can easily show you have 0 clue what you're talking about. Explain "what they do" with gender affirming care. Be detailed
Chemically or surgically neutering children. It's mutilation, not "care."@@hhlptf
@@thesisypheanjournal1271 I would call it "blind affirming care", as you're not really assisting or changing vision by removing someone's eyes. Additionally, gender affirming care can be done on any age individual, not just on children. Gender affirming care attempts to match a phenotypical sex, which is only observable and is not the same thing as genotypical sex.
Gender affirming care does not always remove the ability to procreate, but does typically end in inadvertent sterilization (sort of like how most people born with XY chromosomes are phenotypically male).
I'm a paid subscriber to CW's Substack, and proud to say so. This gender jihad is bonkers, and we need more people fighting it.
🙏
Why so concerned about other have w people live their lives? Are you really that fragile?😂
@@jeffsmith5787 I'm not sure what the reality of biological sex has to do with how people live their lives, other than the obvious. Can you explain what you are asking?
@@jeffsmith5787 People living their lives isn't the same as making everyone believe gender ideology nonsense
@@jeffsmith5787 "Why so concerned about other have w people live their lives?"
Because they are forcing me to live in their little fantasy world, and I don't feel like playing.
Thank you for the great talk, and explicitly addressing (using the solar system analogy) why sex is define based on gamete size. Good science is based on developing predictive, efficient, and coherent models - this is the case with the heliocentric astronomical model AND the gamete size based sex binary model.
I'd agree that personalities are on a spectrum, there are strong, skilled hardworking women in the construction fields, and warm, compassionate men in the nursing fields, that's their personalities, not their genders.
100% this madness has overtaken us because people who have kids are so busy raising them, while people without kids have time to disrupt them.
We have to begin by not saying we live in this confusing world but just bring back into balance. Let’s bring back sanity and fight the insanity.
I am just not complying in this insanity, male and female are real and everyone needs to get their children out of school, i feel so blessed that my children are grown up and I feel very sorry for parents now days 😔 your children are being brainwashed and confused it's so sad 😭
Schools: "btw. some people are trans"
Normal parents: "oh look, my kids are learning provable facts about reality that will help them navigate society without unnecessary friction"
Brain-dead fundamentalists: "YOU'RE LITERALLY MUTILATING MY CHILD BY SAYING THAT YOU ARE THE ANTICHRIST THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Not being in school is no guarantee of protection. We home educate our two boys and always have, yet they've been captured by this cult too. No parent can completely shield their child (without sinking into abusive practices). Once they are teens and are on social media you lose them.
@@TheDarkWiiPlayer Meanwhile back in reality, there's no evidence for the state of being 'cis' or 'trans'. It's an ideological concept based in sex stereotyping, which is sexism. That's why thinking, progressive parents don't want it taught to their children. And why it's being removed from the curriculum as we speak.
We've been brainwashing our children for thousands of years we call it religion that's exactly where this fictional binary nature of sex and binary nature of gender attached to sex which literally doesn't exist in nature came from it's delusional insanity created by religions which were created to control the masses rulers make religions and they use those religions to control people the more you can reduce people down to a finite set the easier it is to manipulate brainwashing control them
That's why religions exist do as I tell you to do oh wait no I'm sorry do as God tells you to do that's it yes do as God tells you to do wink wink
@@nerys71 Religion didn't invent sex. Evolution did. Patriarchy - of which religion is a fundamental part - invented 'gender'. So why are you buying into 'gender' by defining yourselves and everyone else in terms of it? If you oppose patriarchal religion why are you supporting it's dogma? Doesn't make sense.
It seems there are some disability syndromes being incorrectly categorized as separate sexes. The presenter made a compelling case that sex is a binary trait defined by gamete production, with only two categories - male (producing sperm) and female (producing ova). Any conditions affecting sexual development or secondary characteristics don't create additional sexes beyond male and female.
Correct! The problem then is to realign how society treats and puts expectations upon intersex individuals and others from the LGBTQ community. Most of this is based upon religious dogma of the past about how males and females are to be in society and what we are seeing is an over-correction. All we as a society need to do is allow for male and female categories to be on a spectrum of how they can be socially and mentally in that society without bullying them or categorizing them as having mental disorders because they don't follow how their particular sky wizard supposedly created Adam and Eve. So it is a real shame that the conservative religious right has it correct about binary sex but completely wrong in how they treat and categorize these people. If they would allow for such people to exist, for ex., as a male who likes to wear dresses and hates sports and can't grow a beard we would not see so much backlash and desire to try and conform their body to their mind or their mind to their body. They could just be that type of male. Society does not operate on male and female being reduced to sperm and egg. It operates on the other levels more so. Thus, we need to change how we see male and female and what their roles can be in society.
Biological sex is binary, determined by chromosomes at birth, while gender exists on a spectrum, shaped by social constructs and personal identity. Each plays a distinct role - biology in the physical aspects of reproduction, and gender in how we express ourselves within society.
@@I-Dophler Did you watch the video - it was determined by sperm and egg not chromosomes. Otherwise, how do you have an XX male when the SRY gene is transferred to one of the X chromosomes? This comment by you contradicts your initial comment which said: "The presenter made a compelling case that sex is a binary trait defined by gamete production..."
@veridicusmaximus6010 You couldn't be more correct! Sex is undeniably a binary concept. The production of either sperm or ova - those fundamental gametes - definitively determines an individual's sex. Any attempts to blur this biological reality are misguided.
I wondered and had the same questions like that lady 🧐 it is hard to understand, like how did it come to this? Why aren’t more of us pushing back?
Because people are starting to wake up and realize they've been lied to throughout human history.
90% of the world is literally delusional They believe in fairy tale fictional deities in the sky and those deities decree that they must be one of these two in a false dichotomy that doesn't actually exist in nature.
This guy here is a sad example of a scientist doesn't even deserve the title because he insists on really mixing his religious dogma with his science and allowing his religious dogma to dictate his science even in the face of obvious objective observable fact to the contrary
What people like him do is they realize oh crap I might actually be wrong but I don't want to admit I'm wrong because God says so so I'll simply move the goal posts and change the conversation so that I can try to declare myself right
The problem is the people who violate his idea of right exist as real flesh and blood breathing living human beings They don't simply disappear because he moved the goalpost
I mean seriously gametes? did you even know what that meant before videos like this? Have you even ever heard of that word before videos like this? 99.9% of you probably never even heard of that word before watching some video similar to this
Because that's not how people define sex sex has multiple definitions depending on who you are and why you need to know it average lay people do not care about chromosomes gametes or genetics we define sex in a very simplistic manner what is your silhouette appearance meaning what does your body look like and what genitalia do you have dangling between your legs
That's it it's that simple That's how we define sex
A doctor needs to get a little more detailed because he has a job to do and that job requires that detail A biologist requires different details in more details that doesn't make any of these definitions wrong it just makes them different and scrutiny and purpose for the job function they have.
The problem is when the scientists ignore reality in order to proselytize their religious dogma. That's when they've become bad scientists.
The human species has four physical sexes I don't care what their gametes say or what their chromosomes say They don't say what you think they say They actually make this even more complex not simpler oh people are XX or XY right? No some people are x some people are XXX some people are XXY and some people are XYY Yes all those exist and yes those chromosomes create some very confusing people to look at if you care about religious dogma and binary sex which literally doesn't exist except as religious dogma.
Hermaphrodite is a real person They live they breathe they exist and evolutionary biologist doesn't care about the hermaphrodite because they can't procreate so from an evolutionary perspective there are terminated line They can't propagate further.
These people are not normal they're less than 2% of the population but that's still 130 million people and just because they're not normal doesn't mean they don't exist we're not talking about normal we're talking about do they exist yes or no when you start trying to talk about normal and you start trying to talk about gametes that's you attempting to move the goal post to maintain your proselytization of religious dogma
That hermaphrodite exists They are both male and female and therefore neither They are a third sex that is indisputable fact you just don't like it because it violates the truth that's been beaten to you by your religion.
Bravo! 👏🏻
Thank you for continuing this fight! I have been fighting on a grass roots level as a BS degree holder for years about this delutional thinking, and it is so great to see you and others speaking out and being heard.
The problem is you're the delusional one Yes 90% of the world is delusional That's what religion has done brainwashed 90% of the world to believe in fictional deities in the sky under threat of death these people just want to live their lives and you won't let them because they challenge your religious delusions
what defines sex ? Eggs or sperm do. All of those combinations are either eggs or sperm phenotypes ( or infertile ) ; there’s no third type . Sex is of course only two complementary opposite types in sexually reproducing species. One of each required for fertile sex. No third type required or able to be part of reproduction. Anthropology includes human evolution, biology. I _teach_ biology .
take10charles.blogspot.com/2024/01/what-defines-sex-eggs-or-sperm-do.html
Wednesday, December 27, 2017
Female/Male : essential complements What's good for the goose is good for the gander; if women aren't happy , men won't be happy , because we are complementary opposites of a natural animal species; part of Mother Nature.
Thursday, December 21, 2017 Gender is determined by objective physiological characteristics , not how an individual "feels." With respect to this section of psychiatry , the inmates have taken over the asylum.
For 2.5 million years , humans have assigned gender based on objective physiological characteristics . Suddenly, in the last 20 years some people creep up on you are what you "feel" like you are.
Pre-puberty children do not have an inborn sexuality expressed yet . Any sexuality expressed pre-puberty is learned , nurture not nature .
Percentage of humans who express hetero-sexuality at puberty , if not taught otherwise pre-puberty , is likely to be very high because Heterosexual instinct (genetically based) is statistically NORMAL in Homo sapiens ; because we are a sexually reproducing species.
Heterosexual instinct is very heavily selected for in sexually reproducing species .
Clearly our primate ancestors had heterosexual instinct; and there is nothing in the evolution from Australopithecus to Homo Sapiens that would select against heterosexual instinct ; or for homosexual instinct. Therefore living Homo sapiens have normally heterosexual instinct expressed at puberty if not taught otherwise prepuberty .
So, "trans" deluded children are actually homosexual , unless they have been taught it .
Children are not permitted by law to decide for themselves to smoke cigarettes , drink alcohol , drive a car, runaway from home ; have sex ! how may they be permitted to decide for themselves to take cross-hormones or mutilate their gentalia ?
Problem with lgbt gender school curriculum is that it is wrong about origin and development of human individual gender and sexuality ! Kids need to be protected from the falsehoods in lgbt ideology ; post-modernism, Foucault and Butlerism.
So the hermaphrodite who has both a penis and a vagina what sex are they The eunuch was neither a penis or a vagina what sex are they oh wait you want to move the goal posts cuz you don't like the fact that my inconvenient facts just destroyed your religious dogma
Well do they make sperm or eggs how about the people who make neither what sex are they I mean they exist they're not male They don't make sperm they're not female They don't make eggs oh wow yeah they're a third option :-) they're abnormalities I don't care they exist their aberrations I don't care they exist they're outliers I don't care They exist just because there's only 130 million of them doesn't mean they don't exist you know those intersex people watching this video and reading your comment didn't suddenly poof out of existence because the religious truth that you've decreed upon us must be right.....
Very good point regarding parsimony in theory, otherwise known as “Occam’s Razor”. Yes, this is why gametes matter. THAT said, how we humans conceptualize the whole sex thing about others and about ourselves is complex and goofy. This is significant. We cannot simply dismiss this, which is why Genspect exists-it is human psychology which adds the complexity. We still must account for the psychological aspect. We are nowhere near having a unified, parsimonious model for the human psychology of gender. (I use “gender” to refer to the psychological identity model that includes our sexual characteristics as important components.) Meanwhile, for the sake of everyone’s health, we need to keep our biological theory of sex Copernican-Newtonian. Sure, there are some oddities that occur at edge cases, such as XX males (the SRY gene jumps from Y to X), but that doesn’t make the gamete model of sex wrong, it merely means that it is incomplete by itself. Sure, we need a more nuanced model to account for the oddities, just like Copernicus-Newton had to be extended by Einstein’s General Relativity to account for the precession of Mercury’a orbit. In fact, the old Copernicus-Newton model works just fine for planning probe paths from Earth to Pluto. Similarly, gamete sex models work just fine for diagnosing medical problems such as endometriosis or priapism. We literally couldn’t live through many medical troubles without the gamete sex model. Throwing that out the window is a really, really bad idea. I am sorry, but I don’t see Queer Theory (today’s Lamarckism) saving lives; in fact, I see the opposite.
@@mystic22g4in the Swyer syndrome case, the SRY gene is present but inactivated. Man or woman? Like XY males with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, they fail to develop as men, will appear to be a woman, and will live their lives as women given their biological configuration. Should we force them to live as men because of this technical “gotcha?” Absolutely not. They are still technically male, however. Cases such as these, the genetic configuration for growing up as male are present, but inactive or mitigated by other factors. They have POTENTIAL to grow as male, but all that potential will be left unrealized. They certainly do not have any genetic support for large gamete production, which is important. That is, in both cases their SOX9 gene very likely produced anti-Müllerian hormone, which PRECLUDED female reproductive development. Blocked off. Not possible… well, except when some XY “males” WITH INTACT SRY GENES failed to produce anti-Müllerian hormone (complete gonadal dysgenisis) and end up giving live, unassisted birth! This was a result of mosaicism, with multiple genetic plans in the same body. Man or woman? In the case I mentioned, MOST genetic plans in that woman’s body were XY male while the important parts were XX female. Well, with a live birth involved, and given that she grew up female, female it is. Yes, it can be confusing at times, but some of the confusing situations can be easy if children are involved. Sometimes you have nothing to work with, such as lack of genital development. I knew one such person. She was raised as a woman and will live her life as a woman, but will end up without the sexual benefits of either sex. She is an XX female with deleterious mutations. The last I talked with this young woman, she was very depressed and suicidal. I unfortunately lost track of her. Suffice to say, however, in just about every case save for mosaicism, one can make a technical determination of sex at the genetic level if one understands all the genes involved and not just the karyotype packaging which does NOT tell the whole story.
Of course, we must also ask, how do these people see themselves? I knew a woman with high congenital adrenal hyperplasia. If you looked at her or heard her speak, she looked and sounded like a muscular, bearded man. She saw herself as a woman, however. Her genitals were certainly that way, she produced Müllerian hormone and all that. Unfortunately, her adrenal glands introduced quite a bit of testosterone into her system her entire life. She was raised a girl and continued to see herself as a woman. Psychologically this caused a great deal of distress, certainly. Life wasn’t easy for her.
@@NicoleTedesco Could individuals with Swyer syndrome or XX male syndrome, who do not produce gametes, still be considered male or female based on traditional binary definitions of sex that rely on gamete production? This is what’s confusing to me is not all humans produce gametes would they be a spectrum or sex and how would they fit into binary if they don’t produce gametes?
@@mystic22g4 “male” or “female” depends on context:
* Ego identity
* Social identity
* Sexual interactions
* Procreation options
* Medical implications
GENERALLY speaking, one answer fits well for most people most of the time. For a small minority of people, the answer stars depending on context.
@@NicoleTedesco One thing is for certain, there are currently over 8 billions people on earth and regardless of how one determines male or female based on the context of the examples you gave no one on earth would exist if binary sexes of males or female didn’t exist. The ability to conceive, carry a pregnancy, and give birth is a unique and defining characteristic of the female biological sex. Female-specific reproductive anatomy, including the presence of a uterus, ovaries, and the ability to produce eggs, enables females to gestate and deliver offspring. In contrast, males do not have the physiological capacity to conceive and bear children. This fundamental distinction in reproductive capabilities is a primary factor that differentiates male and female biology.
@@mystic22g4you are correct about propagation of our species. I was attempting to address that in my other comment. What do we do with people who have disorders of sexual development (DSDs), leaving them sexually ambiguous in various ways and infertile? Perhaps we relegate them to an “other” category, neither male nor female since they cannot contribute to the distinct function of propagating our species? Labels matter, right? Where do we draw the line, and why?
Occam's razor. That's what we need.
“Rediscovery” of the sex binary would effectively be like rediscovering gravity… it’s inane that we’re here but we are here for o e reason: the dominance of science funding via government.
Wow, really interesting talk, also, my compliments to the presentation skills of Colin or the person making his presentation. The visuals really supported the story well.
Thank you Dr. Wright.
Finally this topic is being put to rest. :))
He didn't put anything to rest except his credibility as a biologist. I mean the 130 million intersex people that could potentially watch this video they don't just cease to exist because he says so :-)
The amount of ideological capture is terrifying.
The Trevor Project (to whom I used to donate) is not a medical or mental health organization. They are an activist organization.
As is Mr. Wright.
Thank you. Great clarity for us who are being bombarded by activists with so many notions. Why are so many lured to these notions-the activists apply the threat of potential suicide if those with notions are not taken seriously. Now adults are lured out of fear. An unstable product of thought.
Oh you mean like the actual realized threat of murder that your churches have conducted for thousands of years if anybody dares disagree with their religious dogma that literally redefined sex as a binary that doesn't exist and gender which never existed before the church fabricated it and if anybody disagreed you killed them or if they really didn't like you they tortured you and then killed you for thousands of years
That what you're talking about?
The practical reason for two sexes in many species, including humans, is biological reproduction. Two sexes allow for genetic diversity through sexual reproduction, increasing the chances of survival and adaptation to changing environments.
This is all the result of postmodernism. Thank foucault and derrida for this idiocy. It's time for science to go on the offensive. We've been too docile, too nice. Thank you Dr.
I read Scientific American for 30 years. Now you know why I cancelled my subscription some years ago. Propaganda.
The traits that cluster on a bimodal distribution could be described as "gendered", but the anchor of those modes is the gamete binary of sex.
Imagine you stand outside, on a sunny summer day. You feel the warmth of the sun on your face, some light summer breeze is cooling you some, of the suns heat. Suddenly someone comes up next to you and talks about how dark and cold it is. Then more and ever more people come up, claiming the exact same thing. All the while you still feel the suns warmth on your face and you need to squint your eyes because it is so bright...
That is how I feel with many "new knowledge" that comes up nowadays.
For a short time, put one hand in cold water and the other hand in warm water. Then put both hands in a third bowl of water with a thermometer. The thermometer measures the exact temperature, one hand feels the water as cold, the other as warm. In spite of the fact that the water is clearly one temperature, you experience three temperatures. All the measurements are factually true, the construction of perspectives simply varies.
@@tomgunn248 Nice little experiment. I just don't understand what it is you try to say.
Now imagine these people that come up to you are aliens and they're from a world with a star three times as bright and half the distance to it the average temperature on their world is 200° they're literally freezing to death standing you in 100° weather trying to look around with eyes made for 10 times more light They can hardly see a thing in your dim dwindling starlight.
Suddenly your statement doesn't make as much sense does it? Because these things are relative. But you're not very scientific or very logical at all You're not very intellectual at all so you're easily manipulated and brainwashed let me explain how
It is observable objective fact that the human species exist as four physical sexes male female hermaphrodite and eunuch these people are real there's 130 million of them they're not theoretical or hypothetical They actually exist
You don't know much about them because your religion controls your education to a huge extent and it controls our politics and it controls our corporations and a controls our public figures we've been brainwashing people under religious dogma for thousands of years 90% of the world lives under this delusion
In order to make it easier to control you they want to whittle you down to a smaller subset of choices as possible because intersection individuals are so rare relatively speaking especially thousands of years ago where they probably amounted to a few hundred people worldwide even though they're 130 million people worldwide today
It was easy enough when they're born you either mutilate them to make them one sex to the other or you kill them and dispose of them because they're an inconvenient fact to your religious dogma worldview
And then if by chance you have parents that don't mutilate or murder you they'll try to educate you to stay quiet stay in the closet don't tell anybody what you feel or what you look like or the kind of person you are or they'll kill you or worse torture you then kill you
The church decided it's easier to manipulate people if there's only two sexes and then we have this problem of expression people's personalities that's what gender is after all it's just your personality with a sexual connotation that separation is a fiction it was created by the church The church literally fabricated the very concept of male gender and female gender out of whole cloth They pulled it right out of their butts right up thin air and said we shall decree that men shall behave like this and women shall behave like this and we're going to make it even more confusing by using the same words to describe both sex and gender because we don't want people to know that section gender are different things we want to force them into thinking they're the same thing because that whittles you down to fitting into two boxes and that makes you much much easier to manipulate control and brainwash and we've done this for thousands of years under threat of death which is why most of the world lives under this delusion.
The reality is the church compelled you to believe that son was warm and that it was bright even though the world could be so much warmer and so much brighter those other people realize it You're still hanging on to your religious dogma
This was excellent - thank you for bringing such clarity to this area which has been deliberately obfuscated.
Why am I watching this I already know this 🤔
I'm glad he brought up how sexist this is. As a female who grew up a tomboy, I was often made into a joke at school. My parents wouldn't let me have things because they were for boys. I bought my first game system at 19 although my brother had owed all the other ones. My mom would even constantly ask or accuse me of being gay. I was also quite homey until I was about 17-20 when puberty was evening out. I was an assertive sports player and always involved in sports. And now these kids want to tell me I'm on a spectrum of male? 90s were all about girl power and girls can enjoy the same things. Now kids are like yours about 60%male 🤪😂 I'm so glad I grew up when I did. This generation would have fucked up my mental.
What used to be common knowledge 👏🏻
Didn’t George Orwell predict this stuff?
wow, somebody actually speaking some sense... how shocking
I am so glad to see that Colin has "fallen on his feet" after being hounded out or academia. I am embarrassed to be an academic these days. But more important than my embarrassment is that “we” have trained an entire cohort of middle class entitled jerks to take over all our institutions. I am not clear how we recover from this.
Here ins Australia, Billboard Chris visited us last week. I had the pleasure of meeting him and walking around the University of Melbourne campus. He was attacked by anyone who saw him. But even in the public square in the centre of town, most people under 30 thought he was just beyond the pale. They thought children CAN consent to puberty blockers because they “know” who they are. These people vote. Overwhelmingly they believe this nonsense. The ONLY chance if feminists and lawsuits by regretting transitioners against the doctors who mutilated them.
Very useful thanks
It's always helpful to understand how language is being manipulated so we know what conversation we're having & limit our chances of being caught out. However, the question I have with all this 'new thinking' on established topics is simply, what problem does it solve? What is the benefit, and to who, of this 'new thinking'?
Well control for one, now we don't have forced gender roles, that is freedom. Except for the fact that women are still being oppressed in places like Texas and Alabama if people realized that no, not every single woman is the same and that no, they aren't lesser than men. We might get stuff done instead of wasting countless hours hearing yall whine about how "you don't get it". Do 10 mins of research if you don't understand. Stop being lazy and saying "well I don't get it and I won't try". in the bare minimum if you understand it maybe you could argue your own points better. That being said, we already have the technology to manipulate many characteristics of children while they bare still just an egg. It's not too far off where it won't be surgery to affirm gender it will just be genetically. Then what arguments could be said? They literally WILL be genetically whatever they choose and there won't be any surgery involved at all.
Yes it is interesting it's too bad most of you summarily ignore it.
You know the fact that rulers created religions for the sole purpose of manipulating brainwashing controlling people and we rendered our mental broad scape our mindscape down to a false dichotomy of male and female men and women and we lock those two together so you can't even swap between them because the fewer options you have the easier you are to brainwash manipulate and control and that's the purpose of religion to do that
Let's ignore the fact that we literally have 130 million people alive on this planet who are literally exceptions to your false dichotomy of male and female sex these people are called intersex They are literally many of them neither male nor female some of them are both some of them are neither many of them are a mix of the two
No one is saying they're normal they're 1.7% of the population they're obviously abnormalities That's irrelevant That's what a snake oil says man says when he wants to dismiss inconvenient facts that destroy his truth
The fact is these people exist and the fact is they don't fit in male or female categories which is proof outright objective fact observable fact that the dichotomy of male and female sex is a fiction
And let's not even talk about gender we literally created male and female gender out of thin air we pulled them right out of our ass and decreed they exist and applied them to male and female sex in order to restrict your mental mindscape to make you easier to manipulate control and brainwash.
And if you disagreed openly the church would kill you
Don't think this still happens now? Go try being gay in Russia Go ask Alan turing's family what they did to him when they found out he was gay even though he helped us win world war II literally helped us win world war II they imprisoned and castrated him when they found out he was gay.
This movement isn't new it's existed throughout all of humanity's existence because the false dichotomy of section gender is literally that it's a logical fallacy it doesn't actually exist in reality we made it up because it makes it easier to brainwash you
These people are coming out of the closet so to speak now because we finally live in a time where some of us in some places I don't include myself in the trans community can be open about who they are without the fear of immediate murder or torture.
And God forbid if these people are a little bit confused because they've had to hide in the closet for thousands of years so they don't have a history of discussion talking about and understanding what they are and how they feel because we kept murdering them.
At the 20 min mark: You could add that male body hair is more profuse in Caucasian men than men of other races. This could be socially inconvenient now but it is nevertheless the case, probably because Caucasians largely evolved in colder climates.
And Caucasian women?
What about Arab men? In my experience they are the most hairy though 😂
@@annamariposa6959 They are considered Caucasian ("White") as also in Iran. They also evolved in desert climates with cold nights. Non-Caucasians often evolved in climates that were hot and moist both day and night.
Before Dr Wright was born, a strategy of the intellectual Left was unfolding on campuses in the West---and amongst publishers in the print media. This became very apparent in the emphasis being applied to the substitution of the word "gender" in place of the word "sex." Once that horse was out of the barn it became a lot easier for the social revolutionaries to tear down the tradition and authority that had existed for centuries. Sex was no longer a biological absolute, rather it became a "choice" made by free adults, and ultimately even a choice made by children before they were sufficiently mature in their outlook (and their bodies) to comprehend reality.
The sex binary is something we should all be proud of. Not try to destroy. It's so ingrained in our culture & biology. It's been a part of all life for nearly 2 billion years & has been the sole reason we've evolved. As a mother, it gives me great happiness to participate. 🥰 But.. I also fear for my son with this conflicting ideology being encouraged..