I watched a news feed of dead people laying 3 feet apart placed on a mound as the camera panned by, one of the dead, looked up and around and then was dead again this was years ago I've tried and tried to find that video change is a coming, but it won't be without consequences let's meet up then, and rejoice
@@melisentiapheiffer3034 exactly.. plus his kids were being outcasted in school because of his friendship with OJ... Btw please say hi to Michelle Pheifer for me
His facial expressions are a testimony in itself. This crucial to a juror trying to determine if the witness can be believed. Bailey’s face says believe them not.
In his book oj simpson says: "He would have taken a bullet or stood in front of a train for nicole". Man I'm tell you that's some bad luck that one guy who would die for you, kills you! -Norm MacDonald, 1994
LOL! I JUST watched that video "35 Minutes of Why Norm Macdonald Got Fired on Weekend Update" where Norm is just ragging on OJ nonstop. Then I decided that I wanted to watch a real life documentary on the murders, and wound up clicking this video first. What are the odds?!?!?!
@@nobodyknows3180 That Exactly what I did :) Watching norm ripping of o.j is a lot of fun. Considering that in 1990s o.j's trial was a hot topic and a lot of pepole avoid talking about it.
Norma my favorite comedian. I don’t think oh did it after looking at 20 years later. Anyways. I saw this ok interview from indont know at least 10 years ago. And he’s talking about his good friend “Norm”. It was cracking me up
It doesnt make sense for them to want to notify OJ because under California law he was not the next of kin, plus why did it need 4 detectives' to OJ's.
F. Lee Bailey asks the officer how is it possible to leave the scene without leaving more shoe prints? Well, poor officer…He should have told him straight away that cutting Nicole’s throat caused the biggest pool of blood at the front entrence, not the smaller ones on her head or hands. It had to be the last cut after Goldman was dead in the corner of the garden, so he couldn’t protect her anymore. Nicole was killed by that biggest cut, so the killer surely didn’t stand around to wait for her the bleed out to walk through it many times, especially if he left at the back door. The problem with this case is that the police was not smart enough to explain the scene. They should have had all the answers correctly for a lawyer, who is questioning their job
@@szilviaaradi1911 Actually what he should have done is say he couldn't testify as to the "how" of that at all. It would be pure speculation. And in fact, the Prosecution should have objected to the question on those grounds.
@@szilviaaradi1911 or the killer could’ve had bags around their feet and before walking off from the scene, they took the bags off, which would’ve left no footprints
I honestly feel O.J didn't do it. I feel it was his son and O.J took the heat. Here is why I think this: His son had serious anger issues and was not fond of Nicole. When they found a black Male's hair in the knitted cap, O.J's son immediately shaved his hair
The fact that all crime scenes are contaminated scares me for all the people who’s been convicted since beginning of time and those who’s been beating trials that are guilty !!
The only way to avoid it is for anti-gravity devices to be invented that would allow criminalists to float above the crime scene. Or better yet: something like a tricorder (off of Star Trek) that will allow data recording at distances.
Contaminated? Just stop! It’s not like they brought in buckets of blood and poured it everywhere. Don’t believe the contamination theory. DNA 🧬 is DNA 🧬! Wasn’t manufactured or placed there by anybody but the killler, OJ and his VICTIMS
I forget the title of the documentary, but one of the jurors was being interviewed for it. At the time of the interview, she was in her late 60's to early 70's. So at the time of the trial, she was in her late 40's to early 50's. She was asked by the interviewer if it (finding O.J. innocent of the murderers) was because the officers who beat Rodney King were acquitted, (?) She nodded her head and said "yes". The jurors wanted revenge, and they got it. Unfortunately it was at the expense of Nicole Brown, Ron Goldman and their family and friends.
The poor goldmans and browns got 9 years and $35 million out of oj. Too bad they’ll never see a penny and the 9 years was from his own stupidity trying to get his memorabilia back 😂
@@caroleason5394 they said publicly confess on all platforms and they don't want the money. What's OJ do? Hypothetical interview on TH-cam and writes IF I DID IT. What a creep.
i would like to see how Mr. Cochran would have managed this incredibly bloody crime scene, with scores of cops and investigators, notifying / checking in on Mr Simpson given his past record of abuse of the diseased, calling the coroner, and coordinating everyone. its so easy to be a critic or a monday morning quarterback....
Of course he did it. This wasn't about if he did it. It was to get a black man off to piss off the people for Rodney king. Did that set us blacks back? Fuck yeah. That verdict didn't sit well with the higher ups. Prosecutors botched this very bad
May I say as a ex court employee, If they want you guilty, your gonna be found guilty. If you dont have the money for a dream team. The Prosecutor has deep pockets and lots of friends. They all work together, know each other, and know that your innocent, and sleep like babies while an innocent man sits in prison. Theres a thing called perjury. This only applies to the defendant, not the witnesses, or police. They can change their story, and make up lies and its fine. You know why they do this? Cause what are you gonna do about it? Their friends with the press, you ever notice on every house raid, they always find kiddie porn on the comp? Thats to turn the public against them, They know how to do it, and they been doing it so long their great at it. A poor black or minority or hell, even poor white folks today. Get no justice, they get plea deals, plea deals bring in money. Good luck you all and be careful. They will ruin your life. cause they can.
This. Everyone focuses on OJ, and yes, I think he did it (and that he had help), but you can't frame anyone, even a guilty man just because you want a conviction. The cops lost this case for the prosecution.
@@applejuicejunkie316 the prosecution lost this case, because they chose to defend the police instead of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Allan Park told them everything they needed to know, but Ms Clark wouldn't listen. Who was the shadowy figure that walked into that house it sure as hell wasn't OJ. Allan park told them the dark figure in dark clothing entered the and immediate OJ answers tha phone there's no way he could have cleaned up all that blood in seven minutes 10 53 Allan Park at 11:00 sees OJ dressed and ready to go, luggage down stairs and the front door is open. The DAs Office never wanted to go after two suspects.. ....# .
@@applejuicejunkie316 Most of all, the prosecution lost this case for the prosecution. The cops did contribute, yes, but the state were so incompetent that it would take a notebook to list all their errors. They selected jurors who didn't see a strong link between abuse escalation & murder. They tried to hide Furhman's racist views and conduct, then threw him under the bus when they could no longer deny his ways. They assumed DNA was enough all by itself. They chose NOT to introduce LOTS of incriminating evidence that was left out. They let OJ 'try on the gloves' when they should have had an officer of the court apply them to his hands. And they overtried the DNA, which was not established enough yet it convoluted the issues. They even said in summation "No one wants to convict this man." They got an F minus grade by Bugliosi, and rightly so (a man who was a former prosecutor and wanted to see justice done).
Due to the fact that the LAPD and the DAs office were A complete disaster. They clearly manufactured evidence to secure the conviction because that was standard for them at the time of crime. Look at what we know now about the LAPD and how corrupt it was during 70s 80s and 90s. It was the The most corrupt police force in the country by a large margin. They finally ran up against someone who had the financial ability to hire the best lawyers and chew up their corruption. On top of all that The most ignorant attempt prosecuting a criminal ever attempted by Marsha Clark and her crew. They were outmatched mentally and tactically. They got beaten soundly at every turn. Put all that together and there is too much reasonable doubt to convict. Not one person here would be OK with their child being convicted in this case with all the irregularities that occurred. OJ most likely did it however dumb lawyers and a corrupt police force allowed him a chance to go free and he did.
@@papajoeman23 yeah and remember people with no money get convicted for shit they didnt do...so you people are only concerned because he could afford good lawyers...
F. Lee Bailey is the Tom Brady of Lawyers he assesses his competition and than proceeds to verbally dismantle them to the point that even they become confused if they told the truth...pure perfection
@@felixG83 that was only because of what happened with some big French drug dealer(Claude something or other) Bailey was representing after, he got disbarred due to him taking stocks from the dealer as payment for his services(or something like that) Bailey claimed it was perfectly legal but the bar disagreed, so i'd argue it was kind of a gray area.
@@RedLeo-pf9yo people get raped in County to whoever told you that has some bad information also the idea that people are just getting raped left and right in prison is not accurate
Whether he did it or not, the defense did their job. It’s crazy that only if you have enough money, you can get the best defense. Once a case goes to trial, truth and innocence doesn’t matter. It’s what can be proven, and who tells or shows the best version of what happened. If OJ killed 2 people, he got away with it and we will never know unless on his death bed, he admits it. If he did do it, yes. It’s frustrating and heartbreaking, but it’s better that he didn’t get found guilty of something he didn’t do. Our two different systems of law is if your rich and guilty, you can win. If you are poor and innocent, you lose.
True but I mean what is seen in court is considered the facts in the court case and it’s up to the state to provide the facts so he is proving guilty if they don’t the jury has no way of know additional info not provided in court
@@Booknowlakealmonor And that was the issue. The prosecution felt they had enough with the DNA, but DNA was in its infancy then. Not many could understand it. The prosecution held back a lot of evidence thinking all they needed was dna etc.
On the contrary if what you say is true then why since the OJ Simpson trial many a wrongful convictions and death penalties have been overturned, because the defendants couldn't afford adequate concealing to represent their case. Look what happened to the Harlem boy's who were convicted of a rape that was done by a white man and they were sentenced to prison, just because they were seen around the Park, and tried and sent to prison all five, because they were poor and defenseless with a public defender who lacked the basic resources to defend their clients. Had OJ Simpson not had money to pay DNA scientist, forensic scientists private investors, eight lawyers who were specifically fired for their expertise in law he would have been convicted of murder. You'd have to be a pretty naive person to think that there's equal justice under the law. There's the rich and the poor. The bail system should be explanatory in its self as to why money pays an important part in the criminal justice system. You cannot be that ignorant and live in America. That's why Barry Scheck and Peter Newfill started the innocents project and since the OJ trial they have freed hundreds of men mostly Black Men who were falsify accused of crimes they didn't commit. Sorry to bust your dream world about equal justice, but that's not the real world. You think Donald J Trump would be running around free as a bird if he didn't have money his @$$ would be in prison right now.
I can't believe the investigator's stupid answer to Bailey's question of what happened to the footprints when there was so much blood. First, OJ could've taken his shoes off not to leave any footprints. Even if he was still wearing the shoes there won't be any footprints with blood after several steps. Imagine the shoes were rubber stamps. Ink will run out after stamping several times. That's why you need an ink pad. The final nail in the coffin for the prosecution was when they brought up the bloody gloves. I was shocked when those fuckhead DA's let the defense use the shrunk leather gloves and say "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit" The leather gloves were already shrunk due to so much blood on them. All the scientists and witnesses testified for the defense didn't know when leather gets wet it shrinks? This is just laughable. The prosecution should've had the same size, brand-new leather gloves ready for OJ the murderer to try on. That would've made the defense panic. The prosecution deserves to lose this case. But then again, the verdict had already been made as nobody wanted another L.A. riot. Enjoy the rest of your earthly life OJ as you'll have to face the true judgment.
The jurors in my opinion had made up their mind, no amount of logic, reason, or evidence could have changed their minds. This is the greatest tragedy in the American courtroom. The jury system failed in my opinion.
It's not the jury's fault. It was the prosecution. This case ended when Mark Fuhrman asserted his fifth amendment privilege when asked if he planted or manufactured any evidence in the case. Once that was established, the People's case was dead in the water. Every bit of evident after that could be said to have been planted by the police. No matter if the defendant did it or not, you can't frame people!
Like most people, we can all agree that the crime was just horrific and that OJ was suspected of the murders right from the start. The blood evidence alone would have gotten the average person convicted of the murders of both Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, but the behavior of law enforcement officers cannot be overlooked and their handling of this case, criminalist Mr Fung changing the initials on Ms Mazzola's collection of blood evidence and the taking of OJs blood by Detective Vanatter to the crime scene and handing it to Mr Fung was a absolute suspicious act that can't be overlooked or ignored by a Jury. These people are responsible for the collection and control over critical evidence that came into question not to mention Mark Fuhrman's involvement and the ignorance and arrogance of every law enforcement officers who was a witness for the state. Instead of acting like law enforcement officers they took the position as if they were the law and was proven to know less about their own policies and police manual, let alone the law. Ms Clark was forced to defend the detectives and LAs police department the focus went from OJ to defending LAs law enforcement agencies and decades of bad practice and now their being challenged at every level on every piece of evidence from who collected it to where it was found. Video footage was critical to the defense case of sloppy investigators and lying about things that were caught on video footage walking through blood evidence and Vanatter handing Ojs blood over at a crime scene to Mr Fung 20 miles away from a place four doors down where he could have secured the blood evidence instead he chose to carry it around for hours and that EDTA in OJs blood was never explained how it got on that sock! Ms Clark trying to explain DNA was a disaster in closing arguments and Darden's domestic violence case in closing arguments was just terrible and having Ms Clark rip Mark Fuhrman to pieces and admitting that he's a racist and shouldn't have been a police officer was a disaster worst then the glove debacle. If there wasn't enough reasonable doubt, there was enough now because they refused to accept the facts that were just to little, but was enough to convict OJ Simpson. The falsifying of evidence to convict a guilty man backfired putting the LA criminal Justice system on trial. Had they listened to Allan Park's testimony any rational person would have come to the conclusion that there was more than one person involved in this murder case and if OJ Simpson would have cut his hand at that crime scene, he would have cut his finger off, not some zigzag little cut. The force used to kill Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman was brutal; blood everywhere the killer was covered in blood. Allan Park seen whoever that dark figure entering OJ Simpson house wasn't OJ. There's no way he overslept took a shower and got dressed in 6 minutes, luggage outside ready to go. Why the District Attorney's Office chose not to listen to Allan Park's testimony, we'll never know. The timeline was there everything except being able to identify who that was that entered OJs house at 10:53 while he was on the phone talking to his boss. Instead they chose to play around with freeloader Brian Kalan and his bimbo girlfriend he dated for three months. It wasn't the jury fault that the prosecution team put on a host of witnesses and expert witnesses that just didn't come across as knowledgeable about what they were talking about. And one more factor that was overlooked, "Ten of the Original Jurors were replaced by alternates. I've never seen a trial where the prosecution was pushing for a mistrial!!!! They #u@k up big time.
Whatever. If that is true, it is no worse than the many juries, or vigilanty arbiters of injustice rendered death sentences to innocent Black men and boys.
@Thunder Cloud even if they were all white they would have had no choice but to have reasonable doubt due to the fact mark Furhman forced entrance to a residency he shouldn't have been at then proven to be a racist against interracial relationships combined with the fact the blood was transported improperly unlike it is in every other murder case in history.
No, that's definitely not why the case was lost. It was lost because of jury manipulation, plain and simple. The jury was played. Furman jumped the fence because there was no suspect and he was concerned that whoever killed Nicole may be harming Simpson as well, especially because there was no answer at Simpson's mansion. He had no idea Simpson was on a plane to Chicago (that was his alibi of course). Furman acted logically. He did everything right.
@@stacyg585 no they were not "played" dumb nazi troll, fact is the prosecution really screwed the pooch by relying so much on Fuhrman when they didn't even need to(he wasn't part of the chain of custody of the gloves as he only pointed out where they were while Vannater was the one that collected and bagged them).
Fuhrman, was the sacrificial lamb in this case. Funny thing, Cochran had been Ito's supervisor in the DA's office. They knew about Mark Fuhrman's tough guy vocabulary (common in the LAPD). So they set him up after they screwed the two DA prosecutors with the shrunk glove...after the trial F Lee Bailey went to FedPris for tax evasion, Kardashian died of cancer, Cochran died of cancer, Shapiro is purging his soul after his son died of drug overdose, OJ eventually went to prison(A convicted thief) Divine Justice??? Who knows?☹
That's a way to look at it.. but somehow Ron's injury on his fist and fingers while no swelling or bruises on OJ still bothers me... How did he get 2 people to remain quiet enough to not cry for help...
***Fatso Not*** 1. Nicole’s head was nearly decapitated, so she couldn’t cry out, even if she had tried to do so. 2. Ron was assertively fighting back (counterattacking), so I doubt that it would have even have occurred to Ron to call out for help in the heat of the moment. 3. Even if they had called for help, would anyone actually run to appear at a murder scene to get actively involved?
@@dianecollins8122 a person testified in court, i forget name, he heard "Hey Hey Hey" from their house.. it' seems normal reaction to shout.. it's not like Ron witnesses a knife attack on someone and sees neck slit open and still remain calm to fight back.. he wasn't Black OPs.. anyway, i don't doubt OJs guilt but I'm unable to understand how it went down that no one could be alarmed.. kids were sleeping upstairs.. houses are very close to each other.. the front yard has barely any space
So, a policeman calls and informs you the mother of your children has been found murdered. Who wouldn't ask how or why or if the killer is in custody ?
OJ asked Detective Phillips “What do you mean she’s been killed?” when he was informed of Nicole’s murder. Detective Phillips ignored his question as he didn’t have enough information at the moment. th-cam.com/video/F03W0oMHciI/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/F03W0oMHciI/w-d-xo.html OJ asked Detective Phillips “What do you mean she’s been killed?” when he was informed of Nicole’s murder. Detective Phillips ignored his question as he didn’t have enough information at the moment.
I lived this trial every single day and for all the countless days Barry Scheck spent attempting to explain DNA charts that bored & confused the jurors & public was a waste of time. To this day his only memorable moment was his cross of crime evidence collector Dennis Fung putting a spin on contamination of evidence & says How bout that Mr. Fung?
Bailey: Did you ever exist, or if you did, can you prove to me when you started to exist? Witness: Uh no. Bailey: Then it's a fact, is it not, that you don't know, if you actually exist? Isn't that right. Witness: Well I wouldn't go that far, I mean, we are conversing. Bailey: Just because we are conversing, could actually mean, you don't exist, and I'm talking to myself. Witness: I suppose. Bailey: Then it can be very true, I just proved, that you don't actually exist. Witness: I don't know. Bailey: You do know, you don't exist!
What I don’t understand about this case is if Ron Goldman is a karate black belt and his fists were all scuffed up indicating he put up a fight why didn’t oh have any marks on him other than the cut finger
OJ Simpson was a big, very strong man. He wasn't that old when he murdered Nicole and Ron. Ron wouldn't stand much of a chance against him, because Simpson was also armed with a knife, and cornered Ron into a tight space. Have you ever seen OJ when he was a running back in the NFL? He ran right over opposing players like they were nothing. Karate isn't going to help you much when you're facing a bigger stronger opponent who's armed with a knife, especially if you're backed into a tight corner.
love when the guy says,"This would never happen today"..Well sir,It should have never happened one,It does still happen 2,And 3,your very well aware of all that as well.
When Lange says Vanatter would have to go take the victims’ blood from the crime lab…no. Vanatter admitted that he personally delivered samples of the victims’ blood to the crime lab. So, he had access to all three blood samples - Nicole, Ron and OJ. Lange does a great job in this series convincing people that their sloppy and perhaps even dirty behavior was perfectly fine. It’s not. The cops had every opportunity to corrupt that evidence and in a couple of cases (the blood on the back gate and the socks), it really looks like someone did.
Exactly! He made it seem as if they had NO WAY of getting the samples, but they had every access to. It was obvious the “specs” spread to the gate, bronco, and sock were planted. Two adults butchered from 2 feet away, but he only had specs in his car/home. Lol laughable to think he committed these crimes
@@mackdaddy798 There IS NO "Mountain Of Evidence". I always ask people this and I'll ask you Name 5 pieces of "Evidence". Not, he didn't get answer the Limo driver quick enough...NAME EVIDENCE.
Johnnie Cochran was also Todd Bridges' lawyer. Bridges and O.J. Simpson were both in the 1977 TV movie *A Killing Affair* also starring Elizabeth Montgomery, who vaguely resembled Nicole Brown Simpson.
What’s most interesting to me is when Fuhrman makes the comment that his boss and friend, Ron Phillips, was untruthful about his testimony, and that is the reason Phillips has never made himself available for any interview, since the trial…I realized that he’s right, it’s like Phillips has disappeared from the memory of the case. The fact that Fuhrman cryptically says there’s a selfish reason for that, really makes my mind wonder what he’s talking about. Since Fuhrman himself has never shied away from an interview and was the trial’s “bad guy,” it makes me wonder what exactly, Phillips has to hide that would compromise his integrity…
Yeah that was very suspicious indeed. Another weird thing not talked about much is that other waiters at the same restaurant got killed in similar ways that Ron was, including Michael Nigg who Kim Goldman actually dated, someone mentioned that to Kim on Twitter and she was all "how did you know this"? and blocked him rather then denying it and explaining it, she sure seems like she knows more about this case then she's letting on, same with Fred who suspiciously did not mention Marvin Glass by name in his book, only referring to him as a "lawyer" and "family friend" and conveniently leaving out all of the corrupt shit he did in Cook County.
Extremely interesting indeed. I had to watch Fuhrman's bit at 25:00 twice to register that he has some misgivings about the whole notification excursion they embarked on, and he totally makes sense.
FYI: Francis Lee Bailey was a lawyer who was DISBARRED by the state of Florida & Massachusetts for misconduct in 2001/2003. In Maine they wouldn't even allow him to practice law.
One of the worst juries in the history of jurisprudence. An absolutely disgraceful, shameful group of people. RIP Nicole and Ron, those rotten humans let you down and set free a violent double murderer.
@@Playaflydre The evidence of OJ Simpson's guilt of this tragic double murder is overwhelming. If you have proof of investigative malfeasance that disputes the mountain of evidence against OJ please cite it here. Be specific or forever shut your pie hole.
Those jurors were sequestered for ONE year. This case was OVER-TRIED. The Prosecution took 7 months, the Defense had 2 months, then rebuttal. Human beings are still human beings.
OJ was a very handsome very likeable man “on the surface.” Also, he did his utmost to ruin Nicole’s reputation in his famous passive aggressive way. The jury and the public were STAR STRUCK 🤩. They were ready to accept innocence as much as guilt.
We will never agree on the murders - - what we can agree on is that twelve of the dumbest jurors don't realize that leather shrinks after it is soaked in blood and then dries.
I've seen these trial episodes 5 or 6 times.every time I watch them I notice that its undeniable. Judge Ito is doodling , sketching, drawing. Forrealz... lol
I listened to the entire trial on the radio as it happened. The prosecution did a terrible job and OJ’s team tore them apart at every turn. Cochran won this trial with his “if it doesn’t fit you must acquit.” The whole thing was a dump truck driving through a nitroglycerin plant and it’s no wonder he got away with it. I always park my Bronco haphazardly so that everyone knows I didn’t just park it like that once.
The trip for jurors during breaks for leisurely outings went badly at one venue as they were treated to a Skybox at a LA lakers game , the crowd got wind of the guest , slowly chanting “free the juice “! They were rushed back to the transports , leaving the stadium .
OJ had of been stocking Nicole every day/night just waiting for her to come out side and when she did he was there. During the attack it was very dark OJ lost his beanie/gloves at the crime scene.
@@johnleonard6878 Your assertions were debunked at trial in 1995.by defense counsel. Instead of repeating falsehoods long debunked at trial you ought to watch the relevant footage of that portion of the trial so you can stop playing the part of ill informed boob.
They had recordings of OJ saying he was going to her house and stopping whatever was going on over there and he was always stalking her and kicking her door in beating her smh
Tom Lange adds nothing of substance into this series. He can’t defend what’s been proven. So he just dismisses any wrongdoing without telling you . He’s naive at best. Vannater and Fuhrman are crooks
It's worth noting what Shapiro said after the trial with regards to stacking the cards with the aces [race card] at the bottom of the deck (Baileys construct) : - "I will never talk to Bailey again" And to my knowledge, he has kept that promise. Shapiro was the only one of the defense lawyers who wanted to play by the book. The rest of that lousy bunch of media whores wanted money and fame. And they were going over dead bodies to get it - Nicole's and Ron's dead bodies, in front of their parents. Orenthal James Simpson is a murderer and anyone who believes anything else is either completely delusional or BLM fanbois or both. This trial was a scandal on behalf of the prosecution who fell for the cheap tricks served by the defense. Chris Darden should never have been allowed to play his lousy hand with the glove - that was a serious mistake. And Ito must be the worst judge in American court history. Scandalous! 👿
And, your assessment is exactly why I don’t like jurors. Because people like you don’t uphold the law. I am a black man, and I am a lawyer. In fact, this case happened my senior year of undergrad, and I wrote a paper on it, as well as others in my class. The term “it’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove” SHOULD be true. The reasonable doubt in this case is astounding, IF you’re truly unbiased and willing to uphold the law. A racist cop who didn’t follow protocol. Admitted mistakes in handling evidence. No filming of the crime scene until hours later. The prosecution trial lawyers speaking as if it’s their first time; meaning too much emotion instead of confidence in their findings and tactics. They were thoroughly and profoundly outclassed.
I remember this and watched it as it happened with the bronco chase. He was soo guilty in this n probably had his friend help. Such a shame n so sad. Can't believe he got away with this. I feel if the majority of the jury wasn't black he never would have gotta off!!!!!
Where were the two young children during this MURDER? DID OJ QUESTION OUT OF CONSERN FOR HIS TWO YOUNG CHILDREN ESPECIALLY BEING ADVISED WHILE SUPPOSEDLY IN CHICAGO?
Ron Goldman was at the location as just a friendly drop off of Nicole’s sunglasses she left at the restaurant earlier that evening . The employer sent him on this delivery of lost property , the reason it is well documented of timeline . His dreams of being a restaurant owner dashed ,Nicole was flourishing in her new position in life , a mother with all to give to her kids . A defense lawyer has certain leather for skin to disregard a true reality of evidence. A Caesar’s death case would be defended by his own doing , unfortunately falling over a bag of knives of observation ,if the bag was the trip you must equit
I watched the entire thing LIVE as it happened From the Bronco chase to the verdict.But I saw this channel while looking for something to watch so I thought what the heck let's relive this $h*t show. With hindsight you start to notice things and so far that's been the case. The BIGGEST thing I see so far is how much leniency and gimmes the defense is given by the court.Now I have to figure out WHAT'S causing Ito to obviously lean towards the defense and pummel and keep down the prosecution. Why is he compelled to favor the defense Nearly ever single call he gives the defense the win. First time around when living thru it and watching it LIVE as it happens I don't think I noticed the huge discrepancies I'm seeing now. It's very clear so far but I must watch all the episodes to see if this runs thru the entire trial to the end because Ito isn't looking very good so far.
Ito is a minority and never should've been the judge because his wife had actually did some work on the case. She signed a form under perjury that she had not worked on that case. Should've been a mistrial.
YOU NEVER HEAR MENTION OF THE WHERE ABOUTS REGARDING THE TWO YOUNG CHILDREN 🤔 NOR OJ ASKING THE WHERE ABOUTS OF THE LOCATION OF NICOLE? HMMMMMM! HELLO? THOSE TWO QUESTIONS BEING A FATHER WOULD HAVE BEEN THE ABSOLUTELY FIRST QUESTIONS OF CONCERN 😟 😨 🙄 😑
Oj's attorneys: "I have bad news, and I have good news." OJ: Whats the bad news ? Attorney " It doesn't look good, OJ. Ron and Nicole's blood on the drveway. In the car...its everywhere. " Oj : Yeah, I know...what's the good news ? Attorney: You cholesterol is only 180...
They had to cheat because they knew he didnt do it. You all love to ignore the complete lack of evidence in a case where there should have been tons of it.
OJ has basically, in a round about way, admitted to these murders on more than one occasion. OJ knows he did it and probably laughs to himself that there are people out there that still think he is innocent.
Ive never seen a graphic explaining how OJ parked and walked behind guest house and into his house. Anyone linking that to me has good karma for a day for their effort
He was acquitted, because of F Lee Bailey and Johnny Cochran, the prosecutor spoke at the jurors, Johnny spoke with the jurors. They got beat on every exchange.
How can that guy say Kato didn't have any future. He said he didn't have any money didn't have any future. That's bs, Kato has done well and he would have even if this didn't happen im sure. Bloody disrespectful.
This is purely a question of fact: Was the conduct of the police in going over the wall on Simpson's property fully defensible in terms of legality? I see this often raised in terms of its being suspicious as it relates to reasonable doubt (and it relating to the police planting evidence, etc.), but was it legal?
@@theflyingdutchman_01 you clearly haven’t researched the case if you believe it was a hate crime on whites. He killed out of rage and jealous. Lots of rich white people actually testified in his defense and were the reason he got off. If you think these cops are not racial biased idk what to tell you the lead detective said I’m not gonna say I’m not racist that would disingenuous like wtf lol
@@madelainemadelaine2934 ok so he was sexist too that’s evident from his disrespect of her in the video. I grew up raised by strong woman so I agree he should have been addressing her respectfully as well.
So drops of blood in the bronco but not a bloody footprint from his shoe? And bloody socks in the bedroom but again not the shoes? Also no murder weapon… I truly always thought he did it but even if he did I’m suspicious that the cops wanted to guarantee a conviction and ruined the shocks case
OJ took off his clothes and shoes before he got into the bronco. He bundled it all in his clothes. Including the knife. He stopped his bloody foot prints when he took his shoes off
@@MrAVGNdude explain how the socks got on the carpet when they had a video hours before showing no socks there. How did OJ manage to kill 2 people with only a small scar on his finger?
@@Dan-zw3pdThe room was videotaped AFTER the socks were collected into evidence, which was verified.Did you watch the trial? Youd also know that a DEFENSE witness testified he saw the socks on the floor when they first entered the bedroom. As far as killing people with only a cut, lets you and I test that in a small and dark area where I have a knife, you may not even know about, and see what happens. ONE stab wound can not only kill a person, but AT THE VERY LEAST, can debilitate someone. You must play too many video games where people shoot or stab you multiple times, and are still able to fight back lol. The real world doesnt work that way. Have you ever had a deep stab wound to the torso? I have, AND TRUST ME, afterwards, youre not spry and able to fight someone when youre bleeding and possibly have organs or arteries affected. Wake up dude.
After being so popular in his career and a much loved celebrity I can't believe how OJ could throw his life away killing two innocent ppl....surely he could have spoken to a professional in the whole of America to control his anger/jealousy.....this way he destroyed his life and reputation while his kids grew up without their mother and poor Ron gone at such a young age.. .its just not fair !!!!!
Yep but don't u find it kinda strange Kato heard a bump outside his room that night where they flund the glove ?? and Allen Park the limo driver seen a 200 lb male in black clothing walk into the house those 2 thongs show me o.j. is guilty alone
@@slabbusterrtr7690 This! I watched the whole trial while home with a newborn, but even though you knew he was guilty by the evidence, the defense did such a stellar job countering the evidence. You could tell by Marcia Clark’s expression while speaking to the jurors that she knew she had already lost the case.
![[TH] 2024 PMWC x EWC Group Stage Day 2 | PUBG MOBILE WORLD CUP x ESPORTS WORLD CUP](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vwIQyCmNIBU/mqdefault.jpg)
This was the beginning of the end for cable news coverage!..now look what we have!
I watched a news feed of dead people laying 3 feet apart placed on a mound
as the camera panned by, one of the dead, looked up and around and then was dead again
this was years ago
I've tried and tried to find that video
change is a coming, but it won't be without consequences
let's meet up then, and rejoice
Tmz boss started off this case he fallowed every one around and filmed it sold it for huge money and got an idea and started TMZ
FAKE NEWS! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
thanks for posting them...in order.... :)
In truth, this case was settled on race and not facts. When his best friend Rob decided to distance himself, it is a good warning to all.
He got death threats and his career was suffering, that is why ge distanced himself...laugh
@@melisentiapheiffer3034 exactly.. plus his kids were being outcasted in school because of his friendship with OJ... Btw please say hi to Michelle Pheifer for me
So there was no proof of racism ?
@@melisentiapheiffer3034 he knew he was guilty. He denied a visit from him on his death bed. he knew he was a murderer.
nah it was settled on facts lying nazi troll and fact was the prosecution was pretty inept.
His facial expressions are a testimony in itself. This crucial to a juror trying to determine if the witness can be believed. Bailey’s face says believe them not.
In his book oj simpson says:
"He would have taken a bullet or stood in front of a train for nicole".
Man I'm tell you that's some bad luck that one guy who would die for you, kills you!
-Norm MacDonald, 1994
well of course he would lie to cover his worthless murdering ass wouldnt he
@@tonytrott6318 Exactly, That is What The Joke Is About.
LOL! I JUST watched that video "35 Minutes of Why Norm Macdonald Got Fired on Weekend Update" where Norm is just ragging on OJ nonstop. Then I decided that I wanted to watch a real life documentary on the murders, and wound up clicking this video first. What are the odds?!?!?!
@@nobodyknows3180
That Exactly what I did :)
Watching norm ripping of o.j is a lot of fun. Considering that in 1990s o.j's trial was a hot topic and a lot of pepole avoid talking about it.
Norma my favorite comedian. I don’t think oh did it after looking at 20 years later.
Anyways. I saw this ok interview from indont know at least 10 years ago. And he’s talking about his good friend “Norm”. It was cracking me up
F. lee Bailey: "Can you imagine" ... where was Camille Vasquez to object on speculation!!
Chris Darden couldn't control his emotions
To leave the crime scene unattended is ludicrous
It doesnt make sense for them to want to notify OJ because under California law he was not the next of kin, plus why did it need 4 detectives' to OJ's.
Absolutely
F. Lee Bailey is an incredible interrogator!
yup i'd never want to be up against him.
F. Lee Bailey asks the officer how is it possible to leave the scene without leaving more shoe prints? Well, poor officer…He should have told him straight away that cutting Nicole’s throat caused the biggest pool of blood at the front entrence, not the smaller ones on her head or hands. It had to be the last cut after Goldman was dead in the corner of the garden, so he couldn’t protect her anymore. Nicole was killed by that biggest cut, so the killer surely didn’t stand around to wait for her the bleed out to walk through it many times, especially if he left at the back door. The problem with this case is that the police was not smart enough to explain the scene. They should have had all the answers correctly for a lawyer, who is questioning their job
@@szilviaaradi1911 Actually what he should have done is say he couldn't testify as to the "how" of that at all. It would be pure speculation. And in fact, the Prosecution should have objected to the question on those grounds.
@@szilviaaradi1911 or the killer could’ve had bags around their feet and before walking off from the scene, they took the bags off, which would’ve left no footprints
Yes f . Lee Bailey was very talented and it’s incredible that he was a fighter pilot dude had many accomplishments
All this work for the jurors to make the wrong decision
Exactly. And the fact they could have watched OJ on video at Bundy and they’d still find him innocent. Such a joke!
it was the right decision based on the evidence nazi troll
I honestly feel O.J didn't do it. I feel it was his son and O.J took the heat. Here is why I think this: His son had serious anger issues and was not fond of Nicole. When they found a black Male's hair in the knitted cap, O.J's son immediately shaved his hair
@@NichOlsonSmooth I think it was Glen Rogers as he was active in the area at the time.
@@NichOlsonSmooth and years later OJ got arrested again... Do you know why?
The fact that all crime scenes are contaminated scares me for all the people who’s been convicted since beginning of time and those who’s been beating trials that are guilty !!
The only way to avoid it is for anti-gravity devices to be invented that would allow criminalists to float above the crime scene.
Or better yet: something like a tricorder (off of Star Trek) that will allow data recording at distances.
Contaminated? Just stop! It’s not like they brought in buckets of blood and poured it everywhere. Don’t believe the contamination theory. DNA 🧬 is DNA 🧬! Wasn’t manufactured or placed there by anybody but the killler, OJ and his VICTIMS
I forget the title of the documentary, but one of the jurors was being interviewed for it. At the time of the interview, she was in her late 60's to early 70's. So at the time of the trial, she was in her late 40's to early 50's. She was asked by the interviewer if it (finding O.J. innocent of the murderers) was because the officers who beat Rodney King were acquitted, (?) She nodded her head and said "yes". The jurors wanted revenge, and they got it. Unfortunately it was at the expense of Nicole Brown, Ron Goldman and their family and friends.
It was OJ: Made in America... I watched that one before watching this one
The poor goldmans and browns got 9 years and $35 million out of oj. Too bad they’ll never see a penny and the 9 years was from his own stupidity trying to get his memorabilia back 😂
@@caroleason5394 they said publicly confess on all platforms and they don't want the money. What's OJ do? Hypothetical interview on TH-cam and writes IF I DID IT. What a creep.
@@stupidmgincredible documentary.
OJ did it of course.
i would like to see how Mr. Cochran would have managed this incredibly bloody crime scene, with scores of cops and investigators, notifying / checking in on Mr Simpson given his past record of abuse of the diseased, calling the coroner, and coordinating everyone. its so easy to be a critic or a monday morning quarterback....
not that damn hard, you don't leave Bundy unattended, stop making excuses for lousy cops.
@@jadedheartsz
Bundy wasn’t left unattended genius.
@@bigdaddycool4242 yes it was moron
I still believe OJ did it.
U would have to be a complete moron and totally stupid if u believe he didn't do it
Of course he did it. This wasn't about if he did it. It was to get a black man off to piss off the people for Rodney king. Did that set us blacks back? Fuck yeah. That verdict didn't sit well with the higher ups. Prosecutors botched this very bad
No it was COVID-19 with a comorbidity of partial decapitation. Is what people would believe today.
I think we all believe he did,regardless of race. I'm black and I say he guilty
@@justanotherguy469 lol
May I say as a ex court employee, If they want you guilty, your gonna be found guilty. If you dont have the money for a dream team. The Prosecutor has deep pockets and lots of friends. They all work together, know each other, and know that your innocent, and sleep like babies while an innocent man sits in prison. Theres a thing called perjury. This only applies to the defendant, not the witnesses, or police. They can change their story, and make up lies and its fine. You know why they do this? Cause what are you gonna do about it? Their friends with the press, you ever notice on every house raid, they always find kiddie porn on the comp? Thats to turn the public against them, They know how to do it, and they been doing it so long their great at it. A poor black or minority or hell, even poor white folks today. Get no justice, they get plea deals, plea deals bring in money. Good luck you all and be careful. They will ruin your life. cause they can.
Perjury existed for Mark Furhman.
Right, 💯, they do it everyday
You left out the fact that can kill you and it's called "justifiable" homicide.
what a load of 💩
Sooooo true comparing this case to Cameron Willingham case
🤯 disgusting world
You can't make that many mistakes and expect a guilty verdict. When police lie about their reason for going to OJs house it doesn't look good.
This. Everyone focuses on OJ, and yes, I think he did it (and that he had help), but you can't frame anyone, even a guilty man just because you want a conviction. The cops lost this case for the prosecution.
@@applejuicejunkie316 the prosecution lost this case, because they chose to defend the police instead of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Allan Park told them everything they needed to know, but Ms Clark wouldn't listen. Who was the shadowy figure that walked into that house it sure as hell wasn't OJ. Allan park told them the dark figure in dark clothing entered the and immediate OJ answers tha phone there's no way he could have cleaned up all that blood in seven minutes 10 53 Allan Park at 11:00 sees OJ dressed and ready to go, luggage down stairs and the front door is open. The DAs Office never wanted to go after two suspects.. ....# .
@@kennethcharles1386 Very logical...
@@kennethcharles1386 they lost because the prosecution fucked up.
@@applejuicejunkie316 Most of all, the prosecution lost this case for the prosecution. The cops did contribute, yes, but the state were so incompetent that it would take a notebook to list all their errors. They selected jurors who didn't see a strong link between abuse escalation & murder. They tried to hide Furhman's racist views and conduct, then threw him under the bus when they could no longer deny his ways. They assumed DNA was enough all by itself. They chose NOT to introduce LOTS of incriminating evidence that was left out. They let OJ 'try on the gloves' when they should have had an officer of the court apply them to his hands. And they overtried the DNA, which was not established enough yet it convoluted the issues. They even said in summation "No one wants to convict this man." They got an F minus grade by Bugliosi, and rightly so (a man who was a former prosecutor and wanted to see justice done).
A guilty man walked free, bottom line!
Due to the fact that the LAPD and the DAs office were A complete disaster. They clearly manufactured evidence to secure the conviction because that was standard for them at the time of crime. Look at what we know now about the LAPD and how corrupt it was during 70s 80s and 90s. It was the The most corrupt police force in the country by a large margin. They finally ran up against someone who had the financial ability to hire the best lawyers and chew up their corruption. On top of all that The most ignorant attempt prosecuting a criminal ever attempted by Marsha Clark and her crew. They were outmatched mentally and tactically. They got beaten soundly at every turn. Put all that together and there is too much reasonable doubt to convict. Not one person here would be OK with their child being convicted in this case with all the irregularities that occurred. OJ most likely did it however dumb lawyers and a corrupt police force allowed him a chance to go free and he did.
Money can do amazing things
Meanwhile a bunch of innocent men went to jail because of a certain crime bill passed that year.
Can I just point out nicolw was a druggy who had hookers and dealers.round their kids all the time.
@@papajoeman23 yeah and remember people with no money get convicted for shit they didnt do...so you people are only concerned because he could afford good lawyers...
It’s odd that OJ didn’t ask if his young children were ok, when he was informed that his ex-wife was murdered.
F. Lee Bailey is the Tom Brady of Lawyers he assesses his competition and than proceeds to verbally dismantle them to the point that even they become confused if they told the truth...pure perfection
RIP F Lee
@@dioragates2887 aw he died? Damn I didn't know that.
More like Lebron. Do anything to win
he was so good he was disbarred
@@felixG83 that was only because of what happened with some big French drug dealer(Claude something or other) Bailey was representing after, he got disbarred due to him taking stocks from the dealer as payment for his services(or something like that) Bailey claimed it was perfectly legal but the bar disagreed, so i'd argue it was kind of a gray area.
OJ was not in prison for this case he was at the county jail it always irks me that people don’t know the difference between jail and prison
Maybe you have more experience with that distinction than most people.
@@GetMeThere1 or maybe a program that has paid reporters shouldn’t spread false information
@@GregoryKeller Well....both then.
Yep, one u get raped in , and the other u don’t.
@@RedLeo-pf9yo people get raped in County to whoever told you that has some bad information also the idea that people are just getting raped left and right in prison is not accurate
Whether he did it or not, the defense did their job. It’s crazy that only if you have enough money, you can get the best defense. Once a case goes to trial, truth and innocence doesn’t matter. It’s what can be proven, and who tells or shows the best version of what happened. If OJ killed 2 people, he got away with it and we will never know unless on his death bed, he admits it. If he did do it, yes. It’s frustrating and heartbreaking, but it’s better that he didn’t get found guilty of something he didn’t do. Our two different systems of law is if your rich and guilty, you can win. If you are poor and innocent, you lose.
)))0
True but I mean what is seen in court is considered the facts in the court case and it’s up to the state to provide the facts so he is proving guilty if they don’t the jury has no way of know additional info not provided in court
@@Booknowlakealmonor
And that was the issue. The prosecution felt they had enough with the DNA, but DNA was in its infancy then. Not many could understand it.
The prosecution held back a lot of evidence thinking all they needed was dna etc.
A 9 black 3 non black jury in a community that’s majority white? Complete nonsense
On the contrary if what you say is true then why since the OJ Simpson trial many a wrongful convictions and death penalties have been overturned, because the defendants couldn't afford adequate concealing to represent their case. Look what happened to the Harlem boy's who were convicted of a rape that was done by a white man and they were sentenced to prison, just because they were seen around the Park, and tried and sent to prison all five, because they were poor and defenseless with a public defender who lacked the basic resources to defend their clients. Had OJ Simpson not had money to pay DNA scientist, forensic scientists
private investors, eight lawyers who were specifically fired for their expertise in law he would have been convicted of murder. You'd have to be a pretty naive person to think that there's equal justice under the law.
There's the rich and the poor.
The bail system should be explanatory in its self as to why money pays an important part in the criminal justice system. You cannot be that ignorant and live in America. That's why Barry Scheck and Peter Newfill started the innocents project and since the OJ trial they have freed hundreds of men mostly Black Men who were falsify accused of crimes they didn't commit. Sorry to bust your dream world about equal justice, but that's not the real world. You think Donald J Trump would be running around free as a bird if he didn't have money his @$$ would be in prison right now.
He did it.
The defense proved otherwise
@@rondalemoore2690 If you say so.
@@19211926 The verdict was not guilty.
No question.
I can't believe the investigator's stupid answer to Bailey's question of what happened to the footprints when there was so much blood. First, OJ could've taken his shoes off not to leave any footprints. Even if he was still wearing the shoes there won't be any footprints with blood after several steps. Imagine the shoes were rubber stamps. Ink will run out after stamping several times. That's why you need an ink pad.
The final nail in the coffin for the prosecution was when they brought up the bloody gloves. I was shocked when those fuckhead DA's let the defense use the shrunk leather gloves and say "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit" The leather gloves were already shrunk due to so much blood on them. All the scientists and witnesses testified for the defense didn't know when leather gets wet it shrinks? This is just laughable. The prosecution should've had the same size, brand-new leather gloves ready for OJ the murderer to try on. That would've made the defense panic.
The prosecution deserves to lose this case. But then again, the verdict had already been made as nobody wanted another L.A. riot.
Enjoy the rest of your earthly life OJ as you'll have to face the true judgment.
The jurors in my opinion had made up their mind, no amount of logic, reason, or evidence could have changed their minds. This is the greatest tragedy in the American courtroom. The jury system failed in my opinion.
It's not the jury's fault. It was the prosecution. This case ended when Mark Fuhrman asserted his fifth amendment privilege when asked if he planted or manufactured any evidence in the case. Once that was established, the People's case was dead in the water. Every bit of evident after that could be said to have been planted by the police. No matter if the defendant did it or not, you can't frame people!
He definitely did it and if the LAPD wasn’t so corrupt and crooked he would’ve been convicted but Mark Fuhrman and the LAPD were the cause of this
Like most people, we can all agree that the crime was just horrific and that OJ was suspected of the murders right from the start. The blood evidence alone would have gotten the average person convicted of the murders of both Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, but the behavior of law enforcement officers cannot be overlooked and their handling of this case, criminalist Mr Fung changing the initials on Ms Mazzola's collection of blood evidence and the taking of OJs blood by Detective Vanatter to the crime scene and handing it to Mr Fung was a absolute suspicious act that can't be overlooked or ignored by a Jury. These people are responsible for the collection and control over critical evidence that came into question not to mention Mark Fuhrman's involvement and the ignorance and arrogance of every law enforcement officers who was a witness for the state. Instead of acting like law enforcement officers they took the position as if they were the law and was proven to know less about their own policies and police manual, let alone the law. Ms Clark was forced to defend the detectives and LAs police department the focus went from OJ to defending LAs law enforcement agencies and decades of bad practice and now their being challenged at every level on every piece of evidence from who collected it to where it was found. Video footage was critical to the defense case of sloppy investigators and lying about things that were caught on video footage walking through blood evidence and Vanatter handing Ojs blood over at a crime scene to Mr Fung 20 miles away from a place four doors down where he could have secured the blood evidence instead he chose to carry it around for hours and that EDTA in OJs blood was never explained how it got on that sock! Ms Clark trying to explain DNA was a disaster in closing arguments and Darden's domestic violence case in closing arguments was just terrible and having Ms Clark rip Mark Fuhrman to pieces and admitting that he's a racist and shouldn't have been a police officer was a disaster worst then the glove debacle. If there wasn't enough reasonable doubt, there was enough now because they refused to accept the facts that were just to little, but was enough to convict OJ Simpson. The falsifying of evidence to convict a guilty man backfired putting the LA criminal Justice system on trial. Had they listened to Allan Park's testimony any rational person would have come to the conclusion that there was more than one person involved in this murder case and if OJ Simpson would have cut his hand at that crime scene, he would have cut his finger off, not some zigzag little cut. The force used to kill Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman was brutal; blood everywhere the killer was covered in blood. Allan Park seen whoever that dark figure entering OJ Simpson house wasn't OJ. There's no way he overslept took a shower and got dressed in 6 minutes, luggage outside ready to go. Why the District Attorney's Office chose not to listen to Allan Park's testimony, we'll never know. The timeline was there everything except being able to identify who that was that entered OJs house at 10:53 while he was on the phone talking to his boss.
Instead they chose to play around with freeloader Brian Kalan and his bimbo girlfriend he dated for three months. It wasn't the jury fault that the prosecution team put on a host of witnesses and expert witnesses that just didn't come across as knowledgeable about what they were talking about. And one more factor that was overlooked, "Ten of the Original Jurors were replaced by alternates. I've never seen a trial where the prosecution was pushing for a mistrial!!!!
They #u@k up big time.
Agree 100%.
Whatever. If that is true, it is no worse than the many juries, or vigilanty arbiters of injustice rendered death sentences to innocent Black men and boys.
Case was lost the second furman jumped the gate and let himself in without OJ being deemed a suspect.
@Thunder Cloud even if they were all white they would have had no choice but to have reasonable doubt due to the fact mark Furhman forced entrance to a residency he shouldn't have been at then proven to be a racist against interracial relationships combined with the fact the blood was transported improperly unlike it is in every other murder case in history.
No, that's definitely not why the case was lost. It was lost because of jury manipulation, plain and simple. The jury was played. Furman jumped the fence because there was no suspect and he was concerned that whoever killed Nicole may be harming Simpson as well, especially because there was no answer at Simpson's mansion. He had no idea Simpson was on a plane to Chicago (that was his alibi of course). Furman acted logically. He did everything right.
@IG Farben 9 black jurors you racist moron.
@@stacyg585 no they were not "played" dumb nazi troll, fact is the prosecution really screwed the pooch by relying so much on Fuhrman when they didn't even need to(he wasn't part of the chain of custody of the gloves as he only pointed out where they were while Vannater was the one that collected and bagged them).
@@stacyg585
Exigent circumstances.
Fuhrman, was the sacrificial lamb in this case. Funny thing, Cochran had been Ito's supervisor in the DA's office. They knew about Mark Fuhrman's tough guy vocabulary (common in the LAPD). So they set him up after they screwed the two DA prosecutors with the shrunk glove...after the trial F Lee Bailey went to FedPris for tax evasion, Kardashian died of cancer, Cochran died of cancer, Shapiro is purging his soul after his son died of drug overdose, OJ eventually went to prison(A convicted thief)
Divine Justice??? Who knows?☹
That's a way to look at it.. but somehow Ron's injury on his fist and fingers while no swelling or bruises on OJ still bothers me... How did he get 2 people to remain quiet enough to not cry for help...
@@fatsonot181 l agree it's odd - very strange!
***Fatso Not*** 1. Nicole’s head was nearly decapitated, so she couldn’t cry out, even if she had tried to do so. 2. Ron was assertively fighting back (counterattacking), so I doubt that it would have even have occurred to Ron to call out for help in the heat of the moment. 3. Even if they had called for help, would anyone actually run to appear at a murder scene to get actively involved?
What about Barry scheck and Allan Dershowitz
@@dianecollins8122 a person testified in court, i forget name, he heard "Hey Hey Hey" from their house.. it' seems normal reaction to shout.. it's not like Ron witnesses a knife attack on someone and sees neck slit open and still remain calm to fight back.. he wasn't Black OPs.. anyway, i don't doubt OJs guilt but I'm unable to understand how it went down that no one could be alarmed.. kids were sleeping upstairs.. houses are very close to each other.. the front yard has barely any space
I like the soundtrack of this.
Is this available on DVD?
Afraid not. It’s also not streaming anywhere.
So, a policeman calls and informs you the mother of your children has been found murdered. Who wouldn't ask how or why or if the killer is in custody ?
Right? Why not ask? We know why he forgot to ask, he already knew the answers. He forgot to play a worried and concerned innocent person at the time.
OJ asked Detective Phillips “What do you mean she’s been killed?” when he was informed of Nicole’s murder. Detective Phillips ignored his question as he didn’t have enough information at the moment.
th-cam.com/video/F03W0oMHciI/w-d-xo.html
@@thetrialofthecentury so OJ didn't do it after all?
@@joecook5689 🤦♂️
Nobody should receive any special treatment because of their wealth or fame. Sickening!
th-cam.com/video/F03W0oMHciI/w-d-xo.html
OJ asked Detective Phillips “What do you mean she’s been killed?” when he was informed of Nicole’s murder. Detective Phillips ignored his question as he didn’t have enough information at the moment.
Why would a person need at least 9 lawyers to defend him.?
Because of racists cops whom planted false evidence!!! Even if he did it, he gets representation.
F. Lee Bailey loved dropping the N 💣
I lived this trial every single day and for all the countless days Barry Scheck spent attempting to explain DNA charts that bored & confused the jurors & public was a waste of time. To this day his only memorable moment was his cross of crime evidence collector Dennis Fung putting a spin on contamination of evidence & says How bout that Mr. Fung?
Attorney Carl Douglas: Did Yoooòoouuuuuu have a drinking problem? Whhhhhhhhennnnnnn waa the laaaaàaaaaast time you got Drunk!
F Lee Bailey could make you believe you not even yourself. He badass
Bailey: Did you ever exist, or if you did, can you prove to me when you started to exist?
Witness: Uh no.
Bailey: Then it's a fact, is it not, that you don't know, if you actually exist? Isn't that right.
Witness: Well I wouldn't go that far, I mean, we are conversing.
Bailey: Just because we are conversing, could actually mean, you don't exist, and I'm talking to myself.
Witness: I suppose.
Bailey: Then it can be very true, I just proved, that you don't actually exist.
Witness: I don't know.
Bailey: You do know, you don't exist!
What I don’t understand about this case is if Ron Goldman is a karate black belt and his fists were all scuffed up indicating he put up a fight why didn’t oh have any marks on him other than the cut finger
OJ Simpson was a big, very strong man. He wasn't that old when he murdered Nicole and Ron. Ron wouldn't stand much of a chance against him, because Simpson was also armed with a knife, and cornered Ron into a tight space. Have you ever seen OJ when he was a running back in the NFL? He ran right over opposing players like they were nothing.
Karate isn't going to help you much when you're facing a bigger stronger opponent who's armed with a knife, especially if you're backed into a tight corner.
he did it.
love when the guy says,"This would never happen today"..Well sir,It should have never happened one,It does still happen 2,And 3,your very well aware of all that as well.
Yup
*you’re
Today, people are not in tune with reality. The cop was just telling what it is truly all about.
That F lee bailey is a hell of a lawyer
*F U Bailey
@@connormckenna3407 😂😂😂
Apparently the pos still says oj is innocent.
more like a snake oil salesman
He can sell a ketchup popsicle to a lady wearing white gloves.
When Lange says Vanatter would have to go take the victims’ blood from the crime lab…no. Vanatter admitted that he personally delivered samples of the victims’ blood to the crime lab. So, he had access to all three blood samples - Nicole, Ron and OJ. Lange does a great job in this series convincing people that their sloppy and perhaps even dirty behavior was perfectly fine. It’s not. The cops had every opportunity to corrupt that evidence and in a couple of cases (the blood on the back gate and the socks), it really looks like someone did.
Exactly! He made it seem as if they had NO WAY of getting the samples, but they had every access to. It was obvious the “specs” spread to the gate, bronco, and sock were planted. Two adults butchered from 2 feet away, but he only had specs in his car/home. Lol laughable to think he committed these crimes
Except he didn’t.
@@mackdaddy798 There IS NO "Mountain Of Evidence". I always ask people this and I'll ask you Name 5 pieces of "Evidence". Not, he didn't get answer the Limo driver quick enough...NAME EVIDENCE.
Almost feels like the judge was bribed
You did it
Johnnie Cochran was also Todd Bridges' lawyer.
Bridges and O.J. Simpson were both in the 1977 TV movie *A Killing Affair* also starring Elizabeth Montgomery, who vaguely resembled Nicole Brown Simpson.
i appreciate how they have people from each side commenting in the documentary.
What’s most interesting to me is when Fuhrman makes the comment that his boss and friend, Ron Phillips, was untruthful about his testimony, and that is the reason Phillips has never made himself available for any interview, since the trial…I realized that he’s right, it’s like Phillips has disappeared from the memory of the case. The fact that Fuhrman cryptically says there’s a selfish reason for that, really makes my mind wonder what he’s talking about. Since Fuhrman himself has never shied away from an interview and was the trial’s “bad guy,” it makes me wonder what exactly, Phillips has to hide that would compromise his integrity…
Yeah that was very suspicious indeed.
Another weird thing not talked about much is that other waiters at the same restaurant got killed in similar ways that Ron was, including Michael Nigg who Kim Goldman actually dated, someone mentioned that to Kim on Twitter and she was all "how did you know this"? and blocked him rather then denying it and explaining it, she sure seems like she knows more about this case then she's letting on, same with Fred who suspiciously did not mention Marvin Glass by name in his book, only referring to him as a "lawyer" and "family friend" and conveniently leaving out all of the corrupt shit he did in Cook County.
Extremely interesting indeed. I had to watch Fuhrman's bit at 25:00 twice to register that he has some misgivings about the whole notification excursion they embarked on, and he totally makes sense.
This stuff is good
There will never be another Dream Team like what OJ had ever.
FYI: Francis Lee Bailey was a lawyer who was DISBARRED by the state of Florida & Massachusetts for misconduct in 2001/2003. In Maine they wouldn't even allow him to practice law.
He also successfully represented several high profile clients during his career.
@@QuatMan Yeah..ok. lol
@@roxxylala26 Winning against the powerful too many makes you a target...lol...
He was one of the goat lawyers though and he did do a good job you have to admit
One of the worst juries in the history of jurisprudence. An absolutely disgraceful, shameful group of people. RIP Nicole and Ron, those rotten humans let you down and set free a violent double murderer.
The jurors were brilliant,they knew a frame up when they see one.
@@philipwilliams1754 Zero evidence of a "frame up", overwhelming evidence to convict OJ of double murder.
@@ChuckRosseel lol hilarious. Evidence was planted an tampered with. Stop the nonsense
@@Playaflydre The evidence of OJ Simpson's guilt of this tragic double murder is overwhelming. If you have proof of investigative malfeasance that disputes the mountain of evidence against OJ please cite it here. Be specific or forever shut your pie hole.
Those jurors were sequestered for ONE year. This case was OVER-TRIED. The Prosecution took 7 months, the Defense had 2 months, then rebuttal. Human beings are still human beings.
OJ was a very handsome very likeable man “on the surface.” Also, he did his utmost to ruin Nicole’s reputation in his famous passive aggressive way. The jury and the public were STAR STRUCK 🤩. They were ready to accept innocence as much as guilt.
We will never agree on the murders - - what we can agree on is that twelve of the dumbest jurors don't realize that leather shrinks after it is soaked in blood and then dries.
Lèather gloves do not shrink when they are wet and then dry.
@@QuatManYou’re wrong about that. It takes the natural moisture out of the leather and can cause it to crack and shrink up.
It’s documented that van added had all the blood from all 3 people it’s fact
Say what you want F Lee Bailey kick ass!
Why was the Sargeant there at all if he wasn't going to make sure the investigation was being investigated correctly?
He didnt give thought as to his 2 sleeping children
I've seen these trial episodes 5 or 6 times.every time I watch them I notice that its undeniable.
Judge Ito is doodling , sketching, drawing. Forrealz... lol
So, does that speak to Lance Ito's level of competence?
@@NkrumahTure doodling...? Uuuh.. sort of. I said doodling (like drawing cartoons) ... no??
I listened to the entire trial on the radio as it happened. The prosecution did a terrible job and OJ’s team tore them apart at every turn. Cochran won this trial with his “if it doesn’t fit you must acquit.” The whole thing was a dump truck driving through a nitroglycerin plant and it’s no wonder he got away with it. I always park my Bronco haphazardly so that everyone knows I didn’t just park it like that once.
Oh wow, it was on the radio?
@@dewilew2137 yep in Phoenix all day every day.
Oj did it period.
The trip for jurors during breaks for leisurely outings went badly at one venue as they were treated to a Skybox at a LA lakers game , the crowd got wind of the guest , slowly chanting “free the juice “! They were rushed back to the transports , leaving the stadium .
OJ had of been stocking Nicole every day/night just waiting for her to come out side and when she did he was there. During the attack it was very dark OJ lost his beanie/gloves at the crime scene.
There is no proof of that just like there was never any proof he killed those two people.
@@Jim_Harwood Blood at Bundy is same type as Simpson. Hair in cap matches Simpson. Blood in bronco matches blood in Simpsons home
@@johnleonard6878 Your assertions were debunked at trial in 1995.by defense counsel. Instead of repeating falsehoods long debunked at trial you ought to watch the relevant footage of that portion of the trial so you can stop playing the part of ill informed boob.
Did you see him yourself?
@@Jim_Harwood The evidence was there to convict, the jury was incompetent
They had recordings of OJ saying he was going to her house and stopping whatever was going on over there and he was always stalking her and kicking her door in beating her smh
What recoding are you referring to? Recorded by who, which year? Who was he speaking to?
@@fatsonot181 there are tons of the recordings and interviews on TH-cam.
@@jlorde8838 i have seen tons of them but not come across what original commentator said.
Lange’s inability to admit LAPD damage mistakes is fucking disgusting and scary
Tom Lange adds nothing of substance into this series. He can’t defend what’s been proven. So he just dismisses any wrongdoing without telling you . He’s naive at best. Vannater and Fuhrman are crooks
Ship said, "Do I think the LAPD did their job and messed up, absolutely not". Haha
It's worth noting what Shapiro said after the trial with regards to stacking the cards with the aces [race card] at the bottom of the deck (Baileys construct) :
- "I will never talk to Bailey again"
And to my knowledge, he has kept that promise.
Shapiro was the only one of the defense lawyers who wanted to play by the book. The rest of that lousy bunch of media whores wanted money and fame. And they were going over dead bodies to get it - Nicole's and Ron's dead bodies, in front of their parents.
Orenthal James Simpson is a murderer and anyone who believes anything else is either completely delusional or BLM fanbois or both.
This trial was a scandal on behalf of the prosecution who fell for the cheap tricks served by the defense.
Chris Darden should never have been allowed to play his lousy hand with the glove - that was a serious mistake. And Ito must be the worst judge in American court history. Scandalous!
👿
And, your assessment is exactly why I don’t like jurors. Because people like you don’t uphold the law.
I am a black man, and I am a lawyer. In fact, this case happened my senior year of undergrad, and I wrote a paper on it, as well as others in my class.
The term “it’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove” SHOULD be true. The reasonable doubt in this case is astounding, IF you’re truly unbiased and willing to uphold the law.
A racist cop who didn’t follow protocol. Admitted mistakes in handling evidence. No filming of the crime scene until hours later. The prosecution trial lawyers speaking as if it’s their first time; meaning too much emotion instead of confidence in their findings and tactics. They were thoroughly and profoundly outclassed.
I remember this and watched it as it happened with the bronco chase. He was soo guilty in this n probably had his friend help. Such a shame n so sad. Can't believe he got away with this. I feel if the majority of the jury wasn't black he never would have gotta off!!!!!
nah he's innocent.
@@jadedheartsz
That’s not what the evidence says.
@@bigdaddycool4242 yes it does troll
@@jadedheartsz
Oh, you wanna call names now?
And , go educate yourself. Your ignorance is showing. I’ll debate you any time you want.
Everyone knew he was guilty. A black jury was never going to convict their hero. Racial tensions were high at the time.
Where were the two young children during this MURDER? DID OJ QUESTION OUT OF CONSERN FOR HIS TWO YOUNG CHILDREN ESPECIALLY BEING ADVISED WHILE SUPPOSEDLY IN CHICAGO?
8:52 “killers” he mentions Charlie
Hearing from Mark Fuhrman in this series was really great!!
The size of that condo is crazy
I never realized how big it is.
Funny how he didn't want to be around his murder scene but sure wanted to walk around his house
Ron Goldman was at the location as just a friendly drop off of Nicole’s sunglasses she left at the restaurant earlier that evening . The employer sent him on this delivery of lost property , the reason it is well documented of timeline . His dreams of being a restaurant owner dashed ,Nicole was flourishing in her new position in life , a mother with all to give to her kids . A defense lawyer has certain leather for skin to disregard a true reality of evidence. A Caesar’s death case would be defended by his own doing , unfortunately falling over a bag of knives of observation ,if the bag was the trip you must equit
“I saw a brown spot” A SPOT??!!! Two people were butchered but there was only a spot on the door. Yea ok
I watched the entire thing LIVE as it happened From the Bronco chase to the verdict.But I saw this channel while looking for something to watch so I thought what the heck let's relive this $h*t show. With hindsight you start to notice things and so far that's been the case. The BIGGEST thing I see so far is how much leniency and gimmes the defense is given by the court.Now I have to figure out WHAT'S causing Ito to obviously lean towards the defense and pummel and keep down the prosecution. Why is he compelled to favor the defense Nearly ever single call he gives the defense the win. First time around when living thru it and watching it LIVE as it happens I don't think I noticed the huge discrepancies I'm seeing now. It's very clear so far but I must watch all the episodes to see if this runs thru the entire trial to the end because Ito isn't looking very good so far.
Ito is a minority and never should've been the judge because his wife had actually did some work on the case. She signed a form under perjury that she had not worked on that case.
Should've been a mistrial.
@@roxannemoser so only a white person should've been the judge? wrong racist troll
Ito did actually admonish the defense though, he even fined them at one point.
@@roxannemoser Cochran was Ito's boss at the DA's office at one time. That should have disqualified Ito.
@@roxannemoser What does the fact that he is a minority have to do with anything???
Marcia Clark has stated before that she believes Kato to be amoral.
YOU NEVER HEAR MENTION OF THE WHERE ABOUTS REGARDING THE TWO YOUNG CHILDREN 🤔 NOR OJ ASKING THE WHERE ABOUTS OF THE LOCATION OF NICOLE? HMMMMMM! HELLO? THOSE TWO QUESTIONS BEING A FATHER WOULD HAVE BEEN THE ABSOLUTELY FIRST QUESTIONS OF CONCERN 😟 😨 🙄 😑
Oj's attorneys: "I have bad news, and I have good news."
OJ: Whats the bad news ?
Attorney " It doesn't look good, OJ. Ron and Nicole's blood on the drveway. In the car...its everywhere. "
Oj : Yeah, I know...what's the good news ?
Attorney: You cholesterol is only 180...
We all know oj did it but LAPD dropped the ball on this 1 by trying to convict him so badly
They had to cheat because they knew he didnt do it. You all love to ignore the complete lack of evidence in a case where there should have been tons of it.
BEST jury in the world... The prosecution fail defense won.... My opinion, OJ did it.
So, how do you flee a bloody scene without leaving footprints? Can’t you just remove the shoes?
Jurors for this trial have to live with the fact they let an animal that murdered two innocent human beings go free.
@Linwood Junior it’s some fantasy dungeons and dragons book.
Its extremely obvious OJ is guilty. Idk how anyone is dumb enough to believe otherwise.
OJ has basically, in a round about way, admitted to these murders on more than one occasion. OJ knows he did it and probably laughs to himself that there are people out there that still think he is innocent.
The police and the prosecutors are the only ones responsible for his freedom. The jury had to work with the case they were presented.
He was a GREAT running back though.
Ojs lawyers are bullys
They are what Jesse Pinkman means when he says "CRIMINAL lawyers".
Ive never seen a graphic explaining how OJ parked and walked behind guest house and into his house. Anyone linking that to me has good karma for a day for their effort
F Lee Bailey owned that courtroom . He was so Powerful!
He was acquitted, because of F Lee Bailey and Johnny Cochran, the prosecutor spoke at the jurors, Johnny spoke with the jurors. They got beat on every exchange.
He was acquitted because of a racist unintelligent moronic jury simple as that
Scheck > everyone else.
Literally invalidated all dna and blood evidence, the strongest evidence in the entire case.
That’s the most ridiculous trial I’ve ever seen
An absolute circus. You need a shower after watching it, because its so disgusting.
How can that guy say Kato didn't have any future. He said he didn't have any money didn't have any future. That's bs, Kato has done well and he would have even if this didn't happen im sure. Bloody disrespectful.
This is purely a question of fact: Was the conduct of the police in going over the wall on Simpson's property fully defensible in terms of legality? I see this often raised in terms of its being suspicious as it relates to reasonable doubt (and it relating to the police planting evidence, etc.), but was it legal?
The fact the cops call the white lawyer sir and doesn’t for the black lawyers is all you need to know about them
the fact that OJ slaughtered 2white people and didn’t do the same to black people is all you need to know about him
@@theflyingdutchman_01 you clearly haven’t researched the case if you believe it was a hate crime on whites. He killed out of rage and jealous. Lots of rich white people actually testified in his defense and were the reason he got off. If you think these cops are not racial biased idk what to tell you the lead detective said I’m not gonna say I’m not racist that would disingenuous like wtf lol
@@madelainemadelaine2934 ok so he was sexist too that’s evident from his disrespect of her in the video. I grew up raised by strong woman so I agree he should have been addressing her respectfully as well.
So drops of blood in the bronco but not a bloody footprint from his shoe? And bloody socks in the bedroom but again not the shoes? Also no murder weapon… I truly always thought he did it but even if he did I’m suspicious that the cops wanted to guarantee a conviction and ruined the shocks case
OJ took off his clothes and shoes before he got into the bronco. He bundled it all in his clothes. Including the knife.
He stopped his bloody foot prints when he took his shoes off
@@MrAVGNdude explain how the socks got on the carpet when they had a video hours before showing no socks there.
How did OJ manage to kill 2 people with only a small scar on his finger?
@@Dan-zw3pdThe room was videotaped AFTER the socks were collected into evidence, which was verified.Did you watch the trial? Youd also know that a DEFENSE witness testified he saw the socks on the floor when they first entered the bedroom.
As far as killing people with only a cut, lets you and I test that in a small and dark area where I have a knife, you may not even know about, and see what happens. ONE stab wound can not only kill a person, but AT THE VERY LEAST, can debilitate someone.
You must play too many video games where people shoot or stab you multiple times, and are still able to fight back lol. The real world doesnt work that way.
Have you ever had a deep stab wound to the torso? I have, AND TRUST ME, afterwards, youre not spry and able to fight someone when youre bleeding and possibly have organs or arteries affected.
Wake up dude.
12:32 right.
Circus
After being so popular in his career and a much loved celebrity I can't believe how OJ could throw his life away killing two innocent ppl....surely he could have spoken to a professional in the whole of America to control his anger/jealousy.....this way he destroyed his life and reputation while his kids grew up without their mother and poor Ron gone at such a young age.. .its just not fair !!!!!
he didn't kill anyone though.
@IWantThe’80’sBack pft yourself fool
@@jadedheartsz lmao
@@jlorde8838 LMAO yourself dumb nazi troll.
Bailey was an amazing cross examiner this was his last great case
Yep but don't u find it kinda strange Kato heard a bump outside his room that night where they flund the glove ?? and Allen Park the limo driver seen a 200 lb male in black clothing walk into the house those 2 thongs show me o.j. is guilty alone
@@slabbusterrtr7690 After Kato heard the noise he thought was an earthquake,he saw OJ and Park simultaneously,OJ was fully dressed with his luggage.
@@slabbusterrtr7690 This! I watched the whole trial while home with a newborn, but even though you knew he was guilty by the evidence, the defense did such a stellar job countering the evidence. You could tell by Marcia Clark’s expression while speaking to the jurors that she knew she had already lost the case.
There would be totally different end if the prosecutor would be Juan Martinez.
Hell yea!!!!
And we now get to watch OJ "If I did it...." hmmm 🤔
Disgusting
@@TammyM36 yes, it is.
I think the egg came before the chicken personally.
Judge Ito was such a lame Judge.
10:28 something just doesn’t smell right in the chitlins.
These guys are street cops, not detectives