You can't tell me that taking that much oil from the ground is going to be okay for the environment. I understand that the drilling is 600 meters below the ground, but just because you can't see the effects of it doesn't mean that there are no effects. You can try to sugar-coat it, but it is still a fossil fuel that will be extracted (bad for the environment) and burned (even worse for the environment) and is non-renewable (arguably takes millions of years to form fossil fuels like oil). That's great that something is being done to mitigate the damage of extracting the resource, I will say. But we ultimately need alternatives, not executives sugarcoating the real damage they are causing to the environment, and to people. This is still bad. And I hope people aren't convinced that this is really the "future" of energy production.
So you can provide us with your good alternative for environmentally safe drilling or you just shut up for the experts to say what they can do to mitigate the effects if you don’t have any idea?
I am totaly Impressed with the Whole Concept of Carmon Creek !!!!! It shows all the Critical thinking Has Been Done !!!!!
Angelica Hale
Singer
Good energy educational piece.
pretty good planning. the people will know you were there, as they jet around the world to preach carbon free
Shell, the international integrated energy behemoth that brought you duct taped wooden handrails for splinter safety. Diversity is our lameness.
CRUDE OFFICIAL
sounds nice, but ima call BS now instead of in hindsight.
big oil
Cancelled!
+godq3 whats cancelled?
to bad alberta and the ndp that was in power killed shell in peace river
You can't tell me that taking that much oil from the ground is going to be okay for the environment. I understand that the drilling is 600 meters below the ground, but just because you can't see the effects of it doesn't mean that there are no effects. You can try to sugar-coat it, but it is still a fossil fuel that will be extracted (bad for the environment) and burned (even worse for the environment) and is non-renewable (arguably takes millions of years to form fossil fuels like oil). That's great that something is being done to mitigate the damage of extracting the resource, I will say. But we ultimately need alternatives, not executives sugarcoating the real damage they are causing to the environment, and to people.
This is still bad. And I hope people aren't convinced that this is really the "future" of energy production.
so what is the bad effect please?
Hbin
So you can provide us with your good alternative for environmentally safe drilling or you just shut up for the experts to say what they can do to mitigate the effects if you don’t have any idea?
Why i am i seeing Seaboard Transport as the delivery truck for Shell Gas instead of a Shell Branded Truck?
Great video!
What about the Ogoni people?