วีดีโอ

Super helpful 🎉

Thanks so much sir

Thanks so much for this brother

it was very helpful thanks

It was helpful..

Thank you sir , you are a life saver ☺️

That was really helpful, thanks to u!! but I couldn't understand neither the falsity of the 3rd row (the 1st example)🤔nor the whole second example especially with the final answer column. can someone plz explain that for me 😵

great

The second argument could be expressed like this g=> not r and not r therfore g then you could say that the structure of the argument is the same as in a hence argument b is invalid

Hello, I noticed a problem: (it might not be a problem in its usual sense): You were using the diagram to drew the conclusion (in seatwork 8), based on whether the circles have a common intersection or not, but this is problematic. I think there two cases here, how the drawing could be interpreted: 1., If there is an existing intersection of two (or more) groups, then it mush have at least one element. (I think you used this.) 2., An existing intersection of two group does not indicate whether it has an element or not. For shorter writing I named the group of A students "A" students sitting in the first row "B" and attractive students "C". So interpretation 1. cannot be valid, because (since there is a visually existing section) that would also indicate that sections like "(A and C crossection) - (A and B crossection)) " (sorry not sure if this is the correct term, and by this i meant the students who are A students, and also attractive, but not sitting in the front row) would also have at least one element, when this was not indicated in the text format. So using this interpretation gets us to the text and the drawing not matching each other. Interpretation 2. also cannot be valid, since the diagram did not indicate that "A and B and C crossection" (both attractive, front row, and A sudents) has an element, when we know from the text that it has. This also gets us to the text and diagram not matching each other. I think the correct form would be using the 2. interpretation, but with marking whether a section has or not has elements when there is information on that. I think putting somehing like an "E" mark into a section with elements to indicate, or graying out a no element section would be suitable for this purpose.

Thnks a lot . 🙏

Good video ❤ love from blackhole

Thank you alot I appreciate this video it had taken me alot of time to understand but when you worked it out I understood

Thankssss!

Life saver🎉

TRY USE TRUTH TABLES THEY EASY FOR SOMEONE TO UNDERSTAND

bro you fucking suck. get straight to the point damn.

✨️

Hi Kouhai Krew

Was struggling with this concept until I got to this video. Thank you so much for the simple explanation.

THANK YOUUUUUU

Good day! May I ask if you know the answer to this? What is the truth value of this "If today is not monday, then yesterday is sunday" Hypothesis is false and conclusion is true so the truth value is false? Am I right?

Thank bhai

theruna ayye. hodata explain karala dunna. jaya wewa.

😘 thanks man.

Is there a case that these arguments can be valid? Thankyouu

mabuhay

thank you man, you're so helpful

This helps me a lot, our midterm is later na!! Thank you so much for this! ❤🎉

god

what if i have for example 5 variables? do i need to write all 32 rows? is there a way to solve this without the truth table?

Your way of teaching is incredible.

thank you po

What is elementary valid argument form? Prove the validity of the following? (a) p>q .....p.... therefore q (b) p>q....q>r..... therefore p>r (c) P.... therefore P v q. Plis help🙏

Short & clear👏👏👏

Just loved it. Thanks a lot for your easy explanation ❤❤

Thank you so much! I am cramming before my final tomorrow!

ty

Thanks a lot bro,i scored good Marks in maths exam bcoz of u🤝

Woooow thanks muuuchh

What is the 3 dots mean??

These is wonderful and thanks allot.

Thank you sir and God bless. Pde po bang mga-upload p po kayo ng maraming videos n ganito? More on complicated questions po?

Thank you sir!

Check it is valid or invalid?? If the two sides of the triangle are equal then opposite angles are not equal .Therefore opposite angles are not equal

I cant thank you enough! this is the best method I found after watching videos for hours

Thanks Sir

Your explaination is simple and easy to understand

Ga bisa bahasa engress

THANKYOU FOR THE VERY CLEAR EXPLANATION